Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Állatrendszertani És Ökológiai Tanszék Biológia Doktori Iskola Iskolavezetę: Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Állatrendszertani És Ökológiai Tanszék Biológia Doktori Iskola Iskolavezetę: Dr Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Állatrendszertani és Ökológiai Tanszék Biológia Doktori Iskola IskolavezetĘ: Dr. Erdei Anna akadémikus, egyetemi tanár Zootaxonómia, állatökológia, hidrobiológia Doktori Program ProgramvezetĘ: Dr. Dózsa–Farkas Klára egyetemi tanár, az MTA Doktora MAGYARORSZÁG SZÁZLÁBÚINAK (CHILOPODA) FAUNISZTIKAI ÉS TAXONÓMIAI ÁTTEKINTÉSE Doktori értekezés Dányi László Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum TémavezetĘ: Dr. Korsós Zoltán biol. tud. kand. 2008 Bevezetés, célkitĦzés.................................................................................................................................................... 5 Irodalmi áttekintés...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Az irodalmi adatok megbízhatósága.............................................................................................................. 12 IsmeretterjesztĘ munkák.................................................................................................................................... 14 A százlábúak rendszertani helyzete és viszonyai.................................................................................................... 15 A Myriapoda monofiletikus eredetét támogató elméletek, Myriapoda szünapomorfiák................................... 15 A Myriapoda rendszere ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Az Chilopoda osztályon belüli rendszer............................................................................................................ 16 Anyag és módszer...................................................................................................................................................... 21 GyĦjtés, tartósítás .............................................................................................................................................. 21 Vizsgálati módszerek......................................................................................................................................... 21 Illusztrációk....................................................................................................................................................... 23 Adatbank ........................................................................................................................................................... 24 A százlábúak morfológiája, a bélyegeik taxonómiai értékelése ............................................................................ 26 Morfológia............................................................................................................................................................. 27 Habitus............................................................................................................................................................... 27 Színezet ............................................................................................................................................................. 27 Fej...................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Törzs.................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Lábak................................................................................................................................................................. 37 Ivarszervek (genitalia)....................................................................................................................................... 40 Taxonómiai problémák........................................................................................................................................ 40 EgyedfejlĘdési sajátosságok.............................................................................................................................. 40 Egyedi variabilitás............................................................................................................................................. 42 Regeneráció....................................................................................................................................................... 42 Eredmények és megvitatásuk................................................................................................................................... 43 A magyarországi fauna részét képezĘ taxonok.................................................................................................. 43 Scutigeromorpha................................................................................................................................................ 43 Scutigera coleoptrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................................................................ 43 Lithobiomorpha ................................................................................................................................................. 44 Henicopidae.................................................................................................................................................. 44 Lamyctes emarginatus (Newport, 1844)................................................................................................ 44 Lithobiidae.................................................................................................................................................... 45 Eupolybothrus (Mesobothrus) transsylvanicus (Latzel, 1882) .............................................................. 45 Eupolybothrus (Leptopolybothrus) tridentinus (Fanzago, 1874)........................................................... 45 Harpolithobius anodus (Latzel, 1880)................................................................................................... 46 Lithobius (Monotarsobius) aeruginosus L. Koch, 1862........................................................................ 47 Lithobius (Monotarsobius) austriacus (Verhoeff, 1937)....................................................................... 47 Lithobius (Monotarsobius) biunguiculatus Loksa, 1947 ....................................................................... 48 Lithobius (Monotarsobius) crassipes L. Koch, 1862............................................................................. 48 Lithobius (Monotarsobius) curtipes C.L. Koch, 1847........................................................................... 48 Lithobius (Sigibius) burzenlandicus Verhoeff, 1931 ............................................................................. 50 Lithobius (Sigibius) microps Meinert, 1868 .......................................................................................... 50 Lithobius (Lithobius) agilis C.L. Koch, 1847........................................................................................ 51 Lithobius (Lithobius) borealis Meinert, 1868........................................................................................ 52 Lithobius (Lithobius) cyrtopus Latzel, 1880.......................................................................................... 53 Lithobius (Lithobius) dentatus C.L.Koch, 1844 .................................................................................... 54 Lithobius (Lithobius) erythrocephalus C.L. Koch, 1847....................................................................... 54 Lithobius (Lithobius) forficatus (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................................................. 55 Lithobius (Lithobius) lapidicola Meinert, 1872..................................................................................... 56 Lithobius (Lithobius) latro Meinert, 1872 ............................................................................................. 57 2 Lithobius (Lithobius) lucifugus lucifugus L. Koch, 1862 ...................................................................... 57 Lithobius (Lithobius) lucifugus infernus Loksa, 1948 comb. nov. ....................................................... 58 Lithobius (Lithobius) luteus Loksa, 1948 .............................................................................................. 59 Lithobius (Lithobius) macilentus L. Koch, 1862 ................................................................................... 60 Lithobius (Lithobius) melanops Newport, 1845 .................................................................................... 61 Lithobius (Lithobius) mutabilis L. Koch, 1862...................................................................................... 61 Lithobius (Lithobius) muticus C.L. Koch, 1847 .................................................................................... 62 Lithobius (Lithobius) nodulipes Latzel, 1880 ........................................................................................ 63 Lithobius (Lithobius) parietum Verhoeff, 1899..................................................................................... 64 Lithobius (Lithobius) pelidnus Haase, 1880 .......................................................................................... 65 Lithobius (Lithobius) piceus L. Koch, 1862 .......................................................................................... 65 Lithobius
Recommended publications
  • Taxons Dedicated to Grigore Antipa
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62 (1): 137–159 (2019) doi: 10.3897/travaux.62.e38595 RESEARCH ARTICLE Taxons dedicated to Grigore Antipa Ana-Maria Petrescu1, Melania Stan1, Iorgu Petrescu1 1 “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, 1 Şos. Kiseleff, 011341 Bucharest 1, Romania Corresponding author: Ana-Maria Petrescu ([email protected]) Received 18 December 2018 | Accepted 4 March 2019 | Published 31 July 2019 Citation: Petrescu A-M, Stan M, Petrescu I (2019) Taxons dedicated to Grigore Antipa. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62(1): 137–159. https://doi.org/10.3897/travaux.62.e38595 Abstract A comprehensive list of the taxons dedicated to Grigore Antipa by collaborators, science personalities who appreciated his work was constituted from surveying the natural history or science museums or university collections from several countries (Romania, Germany, Australia, Israel and United States). The list consists of 33 taxons, with current nomenclature and position in a collection. Historical as- pects have been discussed, in order to provide a depth to the process of collection dissapearance dur- ing more than one century of Romanian zoological research. Natural calamities, wars and the evictions of the museum’s buildings that followed, and sometimes the neglection of the collections following the decease of their founder, are the major problems that contributed gradually to the transformation of the taxon/specimen into a historical landmark and not as an accessible object of further taxonomical inquiry. Keywords Grigore Antipa, museum, type collection, type specimens, new taxa, natural history, zoological col- lections. Introduction This paper is dedicated to 150 year anniversary of Grigore Antipa’s birth, the great Romanian scientist and the founding father of the modern Romanian zoology.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilopoda; Scolopendridae
    Bijdragen tot dl Dierkunde, 55 (1): 125-130 — 1985 Possible species isolation mechanisms in some scolopendrid centipedes (Chilopoda; Scolopendridae) by J.G.E. Lewis Taunton School, Taunton, Somerset TA2 6AD, England the femur of Abstract are seen on Eupolybothrus spp. Various other lithobiid secondary sexual sexual characters in dis- Secondary centipedes are briefly characters have been reviewed by Lewis (1981). cussed and it is that the the suggested spines on prefemora of the described Differences type above are of the last pair of legs in some scolopendrids are used in presumably associated with mating behaviour specific discrimination prior to mating. The hypothesis is in which male and female head discussed with reference of the come together to Scolopendra spp. eastern Mediterranean,north-east Africa and Arabia. to tail, and the antennae and the last pair of legs Where species of Scolopendra with identical The virtually are tapped. morphological adaptations in spinulation on the last legs are sympatric, a large size dif- the males would serve for the femalesto identify ference exists between them. different and sex. It is that in where the species suggested some genera prefemoral have been inhibited. In spines are absent, speciation may the where be absent genus Otostigmus spines may or spine similar in number of other patterns are very a species DIMORPHISM IN SCOLOPENDRIDAE secondary sexual characters have developed. Sexual is also in dimorphism seen the scolopen- INTRODUCTION dromorph family Scolopendridae. In Scolopendra morsitans Linnaeus the dorsal side of the Centipedes not infrequently exhibit secondary prefemur, femur and sometimes the tibiaof the last of is sexual characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilopoda) from Central and South America Including Mexico
    AMAZONIANA XVI (1/2): 59- 185 Kiel, Dezember 2000 A catalogue of the geophilomorph centipedes (Chilopoda) from Central and South America including Mexico by D. Foddai, L.A. Pereira & A. Minelli Dr. Donatella Foddai and Prof. Dr. Alessandro Minelli, Dipartimento di Biologia, Universita degli Studi di Padova, Via Ugo Bassi 588, I 35131 Padova, Italy. Dr. Luis Alberto Pereira, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s.n., 1900 La Plata, R. Argentina. (Accepted for publication: July. 2000). Abstract This paper is an annotated catalogue of the gcophilomorph centipedes known from Mexico, Central America, West Indies, South America and the adjacent islands. 310 species and 4 subspecies in 91 genera in II fam ilies are listed, not including 6 additional taxa of uncertain generic identity and 4 undescribed species provisionally listed as 'n.sp.' under their respective genera. Sixteen new combinations are proposed: GaJTina pujola (CHAMBERLIN, 1943) and G. vera (CHAM­ BERLIN, 1943), both from Pycnona; Nesidiphilus plusioporus (ATT EMS, 1947). from Mesogeophilus VERHOEFF, 190 I; Po/ycricus bredini (CRABILL, 1960), P. cordobanensis (VERHOEFF. 1934), P. haitiensis (CHAMBERLIN, 1915) and P. nesiotes (CHAMBERLIN. 1915), all fr om Lestophilus; Tuoba baeckstroemi (VERHOEFF, 1924), from Geophilus (Nesogeophilus); T. culebrae (SILVESTRI. 1908), from Geophilus; T. latico/lis (ATTEMS, 1903), from Geophilus (Nesogeophilus); Titanophilus hasei (VERHOEFF, 1938), from Notiphilides (Venezuelides); T. incus (CHAMBERLIN, 1941), from lncorya; Schendylops nealotus (CHAMBERLIN. 1950), from Nesondyla nealota; Diplethmus porosus (ATTEMS, 1947). from Cyclorya porosa; Chomatohius craterus (CHAMBERLIN, 1944) and Ch. orizabae (CHAMBERLIN, 1944), both from Gosiphilus. The new replacement name Schizonampa Iibera is proposed pro Schizonampa prognatha (CRABILL.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Herpetological Journal
    British Herpetological Society Herpetological Journal Volume 31, Number 3, 2021 Contents Full papers Killing them softly: a review on snake translocation and an Australian case study 118-131 Jari Cornelis, Tom Parkin & Philip W. Bateman Potential distribution of the endemic Short-tailed ground agama Calotes minor (Hardwicke & Gray, 132-141 1827) in drylands of the Indian sub-continent Ashish Kumar Jangid, Gandla Chethan Kumar, Chandra Prakash Singh & Monika Böhm Repeated use of high risk nesting areas in the European whip snake, Hierophis viridiflavus 142-150 Xavier Bonnet, Jean-Marie Ballouard, Gopal Billy & Roger Meek The Herpetological Journal is published quarterly by Reproductive characteristics, diet composition and fat reserves of nose-horned vipers (Vipera 151-161 the British Herpetological Society and is issued free to ammodytes) members. Articles are listed in Current Awareness in Marko Anđelković, Sonja Nikolić & Ljiljana Tomović Biological Sciences, Current Contents, Science Citation Index and Zoological Record. Applications to purchase New evidence for distinctiveness of the island-endemic Príncipe giant tree frog (Arthroleptidae: 162-169 copies and/or for details of membership should be made Leptopelis palmatus) to the Hon. Secretary, British Herpetological Society, The Kyle E. Jaynes, Edward A. Myers, Robert C. Drewes & Rayna C. Bell Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK. Instructions to authors are printed inside the Description of the tadpole of Cruziohyla calcarifer (Boulenger, 1902) (Amphibia, Anura, 170-176 back cover. All contributions should be addressed to the Phyllomedusidae) Scientific Editor. Andrew R. Gray, Konstantin Taupp, Loic Denès, Franziska Elsner-Gearing & David Bewick A new species of Bent-toed gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827) from the Garo 177-196 Hills, Meghalaya State, north-east India, and discussion of morphological variation for C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life History and Ecology of the Littoral Centipede Strigamia Maritima (Leach)
    The life history and ecology of the littoral centipede Strigamia maritima (Leach). Lewis, John Gordon Elkan The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/1497 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] I The life histöry and ecology of the littoral centipede Strigarnia maritime (Leach). A thesis submitted in support of an application for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London by John Gordon Elkan Lewis, B. Sc. October 1959 BEST CO" AVAILABLE 2 Abstract Stri The investigation, on the littoral centipede arme 1956 1959 maritima (Leach), was carried out between and largely at Cuckmere Haven, Suesex. The main habitat studied was a shingle bank the structure and environmental conditions of which are described. A description of the eggs and young stages of S Lrigamia is given and it is shown how five post larval instaro may be distinguished by using head width, average number of coxnl glands and structure of the receptaculum seminis in females, and head width and the chaetotaxy of the genital sternite in males. An account of the structure of the reproductive organs and the development of the gametes, and of the succession, moulting, growth rates and length of life and fecundity of the post larval instars is given, and the occurrence of a type of neoteny in the epeciee is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • C.L. Koch, 1835) (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae) in Central Asia
    Ukrainian Journal of Ecology Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2018, 8(4), 252-254 ORIGINAL ARTICLE New data on the distribution of Pachymerium ferrugineum (C.L. Koch, 1835) (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae) in Central Asia Yu.V. Dyachkov Altai State University, pr. Lenina 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: 29.10.2018. Accepted: 03.12.2018 The present work lists the genus Pachymerium C.L. Koch, 1847 and species P. ferrugineum (C.L. Koch, 1835), as well as the family Geophilidae and the order Geophilomorpha, to which they belong, as new to the fauna of the Khovd Aimag in Mongolia. This species is also new to Kyrgyzstan and to the East Kazakhstan and Almaty Regions of Kazakhstan. Distribution map is provided. Key words: centipedes, Geophilidae, Pachymerium, faunistics, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Kazakhstan. Pachymerium ferrugineum (C.L. Koch, 1835) is a Trans-Palaearctic polyzonal species (Europe, N Africa, Russia, western and Central Asia, China) (Sergeeva, 2013; Bukhkalo et al., 2014; Nefediev et al., 2017), also known as anthropochore introductions: North and South America, Japan and Hawaii isl. (Simiakis et al., 2013; Volkova, 2016). In Central Asia, it is known from Uzbekistan (Kessler, 1874), Tajikistan (Verhoeff, 1930), Kazakhstan (Vsevolodova-Perel, 2009) and Mongolia (Ulykpan, 1988) while the considerable part of this large region has never been investigated. Basing on new material from Mongolia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, I provide new data on the distribution of P. ferrugineum in Central Asia. Materials and methods Material was collected in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia in 2015–2018. Specimens were taken by hand and preserved in 70% ethanol.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilopoda) Richness and Diversity in the Bug River Valley (Eastern Poland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 510:Centipede 125–139 (2015) (Chilopoda) richness and diversity in the Bug River valley (Eastern Poland) 125 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.510.8763 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Centipede (Chilopoda) richness and diversity in the Bug River valley (Eastern Poland) Małgorzata Leśniewska1, Piotr Jastrzębski2, Marzena Stańska3, Izabela Hajdamowicz3 1 Department of General Zoology, Adam Mickiewicz University ul. Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland 2 “Natura” Ecology Research Laboratory Marek Wierzba, ul. Kubusia Puchatka 78, Żabokliki 08-110 Siedlce, Poland 3 Siedlce University of Natural Science and Humanities, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Zoology, ul. B. Prusa 12, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland Corresponding author: Małgorzata Leśniewska ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ivan H. Tuf | Received 16 October 2014 | Accepted 20 May 2015 | Published 30 June 2015 http://zoobank.org/FEB80A12-80DE-406B-A270-8D70FCEC32AE Citation: Leśniewska M, Jastrzębski P, Stańska M, Hajdamowicz I (2015) Centipede (Chilopoda) richness and diversity in the Bug River valley (Eastern Poland). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 125–139. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.510.8763 Abstract The main aim of the survey was to describe the diversity and richness of Chilopoda in the selected area of the Bug River valley. The study sites were located in two regions differing in the shape of the valley, the presence of thermophilous habitats and the size of riparian forests. Pitfall traps were used as a sampling method. As a result, 444 specimens belonging to 12 centipede species of two orders – Geophilomor- pha (four species) and Lithobiomorpha (eight species) were caught.
    [Show full text]
  • Scolopendra Antananarivoensis Spec. Nov
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Spixiana, Zeitschrift für Zoologie Jahr/Year: 2010 Band/Volume: 033 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kronmüller Christian Artikel/Article: Scolopendra antananarivoensis spec. nov. - a new species of Scolopendra LINNAEUS, 1758 related to Scolopendra morsitans LINNAEUS, 1758 from Madagascar (Myriapoda, Chilopoda, Scolopendridae) 281-288 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München/Verlag Friedrich Pfeil; download www.pfeil-verlag.de SPIXIANA 33 2 281–288 München, November 2010 ISSN 0341–8391 Scolopendra antananarivoensis spec. nov. – a new species of Scolopendra Linnaeus, 1758 related to Scolopendra morsitans Linnaeus, 1758 from Madagascar (Myriapoda, Chilopoda, Scolopendridae) Christian Kronmüller Kronmüller, C. 2010. Scolopendra antananarivoensis spec. nov. – a new species of Scolopendra Linnaeus, 1758 related to Scolopendra morsitans Linnaeus, 1758 from Madagascar (Myriapoda, Chilopoda, Scolopendridae). Spixiana 33(2): 281-288. Scolopendra antananarivoensis spec. nov., a new species closely related to Scolopen- dra morsitans Linnaeus, 1758, is described from central Madagascar for the first time. Christian Kronmüller, Lüssweg 35, 89233 Neu-Ulm, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction by the b.t.b.e Insektenzucht GmbH incidentally: Cormocephalus ferox Saussure & Zehntner, 1902 According to earlier studies, the genus Scolopendra Scolopendra afer (Meinert, 1886) Linnaeus, 1758 comprises more than 90 valid spe- Scolopendra antananarivoensis spec. nov. cies including the following species described from While C. ferox is a common centipede in the area Madagascar: around Antananarivo, the capital of Madagascar, Scolopendra morsitans Linnaeus, 1758 the species S. afer wasn’t reported for Madagascar Scolopendra madagascariensis Attems, 1910 to date (see http://chilobase.bio.unipd.it). As the Scolopendra cingulata Latreille, 1829 imported specimens are clearly identified as S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of the Geophilomorpha Species (Myriapoda: Chilopoda) of Romania Constanța–Mihaela ION*
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle «Grigore Antipa» Vol. 58 (1–2) pp. 17–32 DOI: 10.1515/travmu-2016-0001 Research paper A Catalogue of the Geophilomorpha Species (Myriapoda: Chilopoda) of Romania Constanța–Mihaela ION* Institute of Biology Bucharest of Romanian Academy 296 Splaiul Independentei, 060031 Bucharest, P.O. Box 56–53, ROMANIA *corresponding author, e–mail: [email protected] Received: February 23, 2015; Accepted: June 24, 2015; Available online: April 15, 2016; Printed: April 25, 2016 Abstract. A commented list of 42 centipede species from order Geophilomorpha present in Romania, is given. This comes to complete the annotated catalogue compiled by Negrea (2006) for the other orders of the class Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha, Lithobiomorpha and Scolopendromorpha. Since 1972, when Matic published the first monograph on epimorphic centipeds from Romania in the series “Fauna României” as the results of his collaboration with his student Cornelia Dărăbanţu, the taxonomical status of many species has been debated and sometimes clarified. Some of the accepted modifications were included by Ilie (2007) in a checklist of centipedes, lacking comments on synonymies. The main goal of this work is, therefore, to update the list of known geophilomorph species from taxonomic and systematic point of view, and to include also records of new species. Key words: Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, Romania, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION Among centipedes, the Geophilomorpha order is the richest in species number, with 40% of all known species, distributed all over the world (with some exceptions, Antartica and Artic regions) (Bonato et al., 2011a). From the approx. 1250 geophilomorph species, a number of 179 valid species in 37 genera were recently acknowledged to be present in Europe, following a much needed critical review of taxonomic literature (Bonato & Minelli, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Taxonomy, Geographical Distribution and Ecology of the Centipedes of Yugoslavia (Myriapoda, Chilopoda)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Berichte des naturwissenschaftlichen-medizinischen Verein Innsbruck Jahr/Year: 1992 Band/Volume: S10 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kos Ivan Artikel/Article: A Review of the Taxonomy, Geographical Distribution and Ecology of the Centipedes of Yugoslavia (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). 353-360 ©Naturwiss. med. Ver. Innsbruck, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ber. nat.-med. Verein Innsbruck Suppl. 10 S. 353 - 360 Innsbruck, April 1992 8lh International Congress of Myriapodology, Innsbruck, Austria, July 15 - 20, 1990 A Review of the Taxonomy, Geographical Distribution and Ecology of the Centipedes of Yugoslavia (Myriapoda, Chilopoda) by Ivan KOS Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, Askerceva 12, p.p. 141. Yu-61000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, Yugoslavia Abstract: Some of the most important problems of taxonomy, distribution and ecology are described. An up to date review of the knowledge of the centipede fauna of Yugoslavia is presented. 1 species of Scutigeromor- pha, 86 species of Lithobiomorpha, 62 species of Geophilomorpha and 10 species of Scolopendromorpha are listed. Subspecies are not listed because of their uncertain status. Taxonomìc problems arise from inaccurate de- scriptions: older descriptions are of questionable validity, while others are made on the basis of a small number of specimens so that there are insufficient data on variability. The age and the taxonomic characters of the post-larval stadia are likewise unknown. Some taxa illustrate the processes of speciation and there are many endemic species. There is little ecological information. • 1. Introduction: The flora and fauna of the Balkan peninsula are very rich. Because of its location, relief and ge- ological history, the Balkan peninsula can be considered as "refuge".
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary History of the Rediscovered Austrian Population of the Giant Centipede Scolopendra Cingulata Latreille 1829 (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha)
    The Evolutionary History of the Rediscovered Austrian Population of the Giant Centipede Scolopendra cingulata Latreille 1829 (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha) Jan Philip Oeyen1*, Sebastian Funke2, Wolfgang Bo¨ hme1, Thomas Wesener1 1 Department Arthropoda, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany, 2 Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany Abstract The thermophilous giant centipede Scolopendra cingulata is a voracious terrestrial predator, which uses its modified first leg pair and potent venom to capture prey. The highly variable species is the most common of the genus in Europe, occurring from Portugal in the west to Iran in the east. The northernmost occurrences are in Hungary and Romania, where it abides in small isolated fringe populations. We report the rediscovery of an isolated Austrian population of Scolopendra cingulata with the first explicit specimen records for more than 80 years and provide insights into the evolutionary history of the northernmost populations utilizing fragments of two mitochondrial genes, COI and 16S, comprising 1,155 base pairs. We test the previously proposed hypothesis of a speciation by distance scenario, which argued for a simple range expansion of the species from the southeast, via Romania, Hungary and finally to Austria, based on a comprehensive taxon sampling from seven countries, including the first European mainland samples. We argue that more complex patterns must have shaped the current distribution of S. cingulata and that the Austrian population should be viewed as an important biogeographical relict in a possible microrefugium. The unique haplotype of the Austrian population could constitute an important part of the species genetic diversity and we hope that this discovery will initiate protective measures not only for S.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Centipede (Scolopendridae) Devoured by a Juvenile Amazon Lancehead, Bothrops Atrox (Viperidae)
    ACTA AMAZONICA http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201601884 Hundred legs good, two fangs better: adult centipede (Scolopendridae) devoured by a juvenile Amazon lancehead, Bothrops atrox (Viperidae) Karina Maria Pereira da SILVA1,2*, Selma Maria de ALMEIDA-SANTOS1, Rogério BERTANI1 1 Instituto Butantan, Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Pós-graduação em Anatomia dos Animais domésticos e Silvestres, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 CEP 05508 270, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, Brazil * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Centipedes are part of the diet of several snake species of the genus Bothrops. However, reports on predation of centipedes by snakes are normally incomplete, and important data for natural history studies as the species identification and size of the prey are rarely published. The aim of this work was to report the presence of the centipedeScolopendra viridicornis in the digestive tract of the Amazon pit viper B. atrox. The snake specimen is an immature female from Aripuanã, state of Mato Grosso, Brazil, having a 623 mm snout-vent length. The centipede is an adult Scolopendra viridicornis, estimated to be 190 mm long, and found in the snake’s stomach. The success in preying on this large and potentially dangerous centipede could be explained by the snake’s dimensions, large enough for overpowering the prey, but still retaining characteristics of youth, such as venom with specific action against specific prey items. KEYWORDS: Diet, ectothermic prey, Scolopendra. Uma centena de pernas é eficaz, mas duas presas são ainda melhores: lacraia adulta (Scolopendridae) devorada por uma jovem serpente amazônica, Bothrops atrox (Viperidae) RESUMO Lacraias fazem parte da dieta de diversas espécies de serpentes do gênero Bothrops.
    [Show full text]