Going to Extremes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Going to Extremes GOING TO JULY 7, 2016 THE ANTI-GOVERNMENT EXTREMISM BEHIND EXTREMES THE GROWING MOVEMENT TO SEIZE AMERICA’S PUBLIC LANDS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. LAND SEIZURE EFFORTS: A SHORT HISTORY 3. PUBLIC LANDS DRAW ANTI-GOVERNMENT & EXTREMIST GROUPS 4. EXTREMIST GROUPS INVOLVED IN PUBLIC LANDS ISSUES 7. THE EXTREMIST IDEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: POSSE COMITATUS AND COUNTY SUPREMACY 9. EVOLVING PHILOSOPHIES: THE EXTREMIST IDEOLOGICAL ROOTS OF THE LAND SEIZURE MOVEMENT 9. LAND SEIZURE PROPONENTS WITH EXTREMIST TIES 11. THE MALHEUR STANDOFF & THE COALITION OF WESTERN STATES (COWS) 18. THE INFLUENCERS AND ECHO CHAMBER 19. IVORY, FIELDER, & THE AMERICAN LANDS COUNCIL: BRIDGE FROM THE EXTREME TO THE MAINSTREAM 21. CONCLUSION 25. 1EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2016 armed standoff at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon provided the American public with a ringside seat to a disturbing trend on U.S. public lands: extremist and militia groups using America’s national forests, parks, monuments, and wildlife refuges to advance their anti-government beliefs. But these far right-wing organizations are not operating in a vacuum. To the contrary, the armed insurrection in Oregon and Nevada before—led by Ammon Bundy and the Bundy family—share the same foundations as land transfer schemes promoted by some elected leaders in states throughout the West. Both rely upon a philosophy based in vehement anti-government ideologies, both have connections to organizations that espouse armed resistance, both employ pseudo-legal theories to justify their actions, and both use scholarly support from conspiracy theorists and discredited academics. Our nation’s parks and network of public lands are one of our finest democratic achievements. Americans see management of public lands as one of the things our government does best. But over the last four years, politicians and special interest groups in 11 Western states and in Congress have tried to seize many of these places and turn them over to state and private control. The elected officials supporting state seizure of U.S. public lands couch their arguments carefully, but our research shows their close associations to extreme individuals, groups, and ideology characterized by anti- government paranoia and a pseudo-legal approach to the Constitution. Since the beginning of 2015, 54 land seizure bills have been introduced into Western states, including Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.1 At least 22 state legislators with direct connections to anti-government ideologies or extremist groups were the primary sponsors on 29 of those bills. 1. Sitting at the hub of the movement and functioning as the bridge between extremism and the mainstream political debate are Utah Rep. Ken Ivory, Montana Sen. Jennifer Fielder, and their non-profit, the American Lands Council. A close analysis of Rep. Ivory and Sen. Fielder’s activities, and those of other active land seizure proponents at the state level, shows how these efforts are a functional part of an aggressive anti-government movement that will grow more potent if reasonable Americans don’t take action. As The New York Times put it: Many conservatives—Mr. Ivory among them—criticized Mr. [Ammon] Bundy’s gun-toting tactics, but their grievances and goals “” are nearly identical.2 In the end, the crusade to give American public lands away to the states must be seen for what it is: the latest outgrowth of radical anti-government extremism, which mainstream legislators of both political parties should avoid. In this report, an update to the original version we released in August 2015, the Center for Western Priorities examines the extremist origins and foundations of the movement to seize American public lands. We describe how public lands issues attract extremist elements, including members of organizations like the Oath Keepers and the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, who use public lands issues to promote their anti-government ideologies. We show that the anti-government supporters of this movement are growing bolder as some elected officials are becoming more open about their support for extremists. Finally, we show how the underpinnings of the movement are well outside mainstream conservative or federalist thought. Below, we examine three aspects of the land seizure movement: IDEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: The land seizure movement’s ideology is rooted in extreme anti- government beliefs such as Posse Comitatus and County Supremacy, the idea that the federal government has no right to public lands and that the county sheriff is the final arbiter on any issue relating to their use. LEGISLATIVE SUPPORTERS: Legislators in ten out of the eleven Western states whose legisla- tures considered land transfer bills in 2015 and 2016 have direct connections to anti-government ideologies and/ or extremist groups that want to see the federal government unraveled or opposed by force. Western legislators also direct the American Lands Council, the most prominent organization advocating for the land seizure agenda. INFLUENCERS AND ECHO CHAMBER: Those making the case for transferring public lands are a small group of conspiracy theorists and pseudo-academics, including one who wrote the “least credible history book in print.” These so-called thought leaders, who include Alex Jones and Glenn Beck, also function as an echo chamber within the radical right. 2. LAND SEIZURE EFFORTS: 2 A SHORT HISTORY In what has become a “Sagebrush Rebellion” of the modern era, politicians across the U.S. have explored, introduced, and advocated for policies that purport to turn public lands and the valuable minerals under them over to the Western states, local governments, and private landowners. The state of Utah has led the charge by passing a law in 2012 demanding that Congress turn over title to the state’s 31 million acres of national public lands or face a lawsuit.3 Proponents claim that the federal government agreed to turn public lands over to the states upon entering the Union, and argue states could more effectively manage public lands. However, attorneys general in Western states have disagreed, including the Attorney General of Wyoming who wrote that the legal effort is “highly unlikely to succeed in court because its legal theories rest on weak foundations.”4 In 2015 Utah legislators nevertheless appropriated $2 million of taxpayer funds to hire a law firm to explore legal strategies for land seizures.5 In 2016, Utah state lawmakers approved filing a $14 million lawsuit, initially dedicating $4.5 million in taxpayer funds to sue the federal government.6 Supporters have also investigated more incremental approaches to achieve their goal. These have included: studies of the economic viability of giving land to the states,7 interstate compacts to coordinate efforts,8 giving local officials special authority over public lands they deem a “catastrophic public nuisance,”9 and attempts to chip away at federal law enforcement authority on federal public lands by asserting “concurrent jurisdiction.”10 The movement has been a notable presence in state capitols in recent years, although so far it has met with little concrete success. In 2015, a total of 36 land seizure bills were introduced in 11 Western states; only six passed.11 Notably, most of the bills that passed did not demand a transfer, but instead mandated studies of land management. During the 2016 legislative session, public land seizure proponents had even fewer successes, especially outside of Utah, which remains the only state where efforts have picked up any steam. Only one out of 16 public lands seizure bills passed in Western legislatures outside of Utah during 2016 (five out of six passed in the Utah legislature).12 3. MALHEUR NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: SITE OF THE ARMED STANDOFF LED BY AMMON BUNDY JOHN MATTHEWS CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 PUBLIC LANDS DRAW ANTI-GOVERNMENT & EXTREMIST GROUPS 3 Extremist groups have been on the rise during the Obama administration. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) documented approximately 150 extremist groups in 2008, rising to more than 1,000 in 2013.13 In the American West, public lands controversies have been particularly attractive to anti-government advocates. The armed standoff at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon, led by Ammon and Ryan Bundy, is the most prominent, but not the only example. In Burns, Oregon in early January 2016, the Bundy brothers broke off from a peaceful demonstration opposing the jailing of two ranchers who were convicted of arson and poaching on public lands,14 leading an armed group to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Over the course of a 41-day standoff, the Bundys took their crusade further, stating that their overarching goal was to turn over public lands to private entities and get “the ranchers back to ranching and the miners back to mining, [and put] the loggers back to logging.”15 Of the 36 known militants occupying the Malheur, more than half held extreme beliefs about U.S. public lands.16 4. Gage Skidmore CC BY-SA 2.0 NEVADA RANCHER CLIVEN BUNDY GAGE SKIDMORE CC BY-SA 2.0 Before Ammon and Ryan Bundy, it was their father, Cliven Bundy, making headlines for his extreme views on U.S. public lands. Cliven Bundy, who owes U.S. taxpayers $1 million in grazing fees and fines dating back to 1993, garnered significant national media attention in April 2014. After the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) attempted to round up Bundy’s cattle due to his refusal to pay grazing fees, Bundy rallied militia groups that streamed in to defend him at the ranch, causing a standoff that nearly ended in violence.17 As Bundy’s self- described “on-the-ground” militia commander put it: We locked them down…We had counter-sniper positions on their sniper positions. We had at least one guy—sometimes two guys— per BLM agent in there.
Recommended publications
  • Profit and Politics How Public Lands Fare in State Hands a Special Report November 27, 2017 | $5 | Vol
    High Country ForN people whoews care about the West Profit and Politics How public lands fare in state hands A Special Report November 27, 2017 | $5 | Vol. 49 No. 20 | www.hcn.org 49 No. | $5 Vol. 2017 27, November CONTENTS Editor’s note Land’s true worth One of the planks in the Republican platform calls for the transfer of an undisclosed number of acres of federal public lands to Western states. This land transfer, the party argues, would benefit states “and the nation as a whole,” because “residents of state and local communities know best how to protect the land where they work and live.” It is unclear how the transfer of public lands would benefit the entire country, but it seems to me that such a transfer on any scale would change the character of the American West. Given that, and given that the GOP holds the Oval Office and both chambers of Congress, the so-called “land-transfer movement” is worthy The not-so-grand entrance to Little Missouri State Park in North Dakota, where a saltwater disposal facility of a hard look. Over the last nine months, this is a sign of the oil wells that can be seen within the park. ANDREW CULLEN magazine set out to learn what it could about how states treat the lands they already have, in SPECIAL REPORT: Profit and Politics order to see whether the public would benefit from a transfer. Writer and former HCN intern Emily Guerin went to North Dakota to see what 16 Pump Jack Park How the Bakken boom transformed happens to state and federal parks under an oil On the cover one of North Dakota’s most special landscapes By Emily Guerin boom, while Contributing Editor Cally Carswell A well pad complex is constructed 20 Plant Blind in New Mexico Politics, land ownership investigated how rare plants are treated on just outside Little and the protection of imperiled plants By Cally Carswell different lands in New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Oregon's Patriot Movement
    Executive Summary UP IN ARMS: A GUIDE TO OREGON’S PATRIOT MOVEMENT hile the news media focuses on As Spencer Sunshine, PhD and Associate Fel- the prosecution of Patriot movement low at Political Research Associates, documents Wmembers who occupied the Malheur in the guide’s opening study, the Oregon Patriot National Wildlife Refuge outside of Burns, Ore- movement engages in the same political culture gon, in early 2016, Oregonians across the state of violence as the national movement, including continue to deal with the resurgence of armed armed occupations, protests, camps, and march- and aggressive right-wing activists in their es—as well as threats against elected officials, midst. Most of the Malheur occupiers were from community activists, employees of federal agen- out-of-state, but Oregon’s own Patriot movement cies handling public lands, and critics. Press con- laid the groundwork for the occupation, and its ferences, demonstrations, and meetings critical leaders went to Burns to politically profit from of the movement have been disrupted. Those who the confrontation with government authorities speak out against the movement have had their and expand their power at home. home addresses distributed in Patriot movement Up In Arms: A Guide to Oregon’s Patriot Move- circles, were threatened with assault and murder, ment offers a short study of the Patriot movement and have had their vehicles vandalized. and the economic challenges in which it thrives, This political culture of violence creates a chill- along with practical examples of how groups of ing effect on political speech and democratic par- rural Oregonians have successfully challenged it.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmasked Protesters Push Past State Police and Force Their Way Into Capitol : NPR 3/23/21, 912 AM
    Unmasked Protesters Push Past State Police And Force Their Way Into Capitol : NPR 3/23/21, 912 AM HOURLYBoise NEWS State Public Radio News On Air Now LISTEN LIVE PLAYLIST DONATE The Coronavirus Crisis Unmasked Protesters Push Past Police Into Idaho Lawmakers' Session August 25, 2020 · 11:01 AM ET JAMES DAWSON FROM https://www.npr.orG/2020/08/25/905785548/unmasked-protesters-push-past-police-into-idaho-lawmakers-session PaGe 1 of 15 Unmasked Protesters Push Past State Police And Force Their Way Into Capitol : NPR 3/23/21, 912 AM Ammon Bundy (center), who led the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge occupation, joins protesters outside the Idaho Statehouse steps in Boise on Monday. Keith Ridler/AP Updated at 3:52 p.m. ET In Boise, the first day of Idaho's special legislative session erupted into chaos before it began. Dozens of unmasked protesters, some of them armed, shoved their way past state troopers to pack the gallery overlooking the state's House of Representatives. The clash was a manifestation of the anger and frustration from a vocal minority of far-right Idahoans that has been compounding over the last several months as the state has navigated its reopening amid the pandemic. To enforce social distancing, the gallery area above the House chamber was restricted with limited seating. But after the confrontation with state troopers, which resulted in the shattering of a glass door, Republican House Speaker Scott Bedke relented and allowed protesters to fill every seat. The response stands in stark contrast to 2014 when dozens of advocates pressuring lawmakers to pass LGBTQ protections were arrested for standing silently in a hallway, blocking access to the Idaho Senate chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep. John Kavanagh (Vice-Chair) Rep
    House Committees Appropriations Education Rep. Regina Cobb (Chair) Rep. Michelle Udall (Chair) Rep. John Kavanagh (Vice-Chair) Rep. Bevely Pingerelli (Vice-Chair) Rep. César Chávez Rep. Daniel Hernandez Rep. Charlene Fernandez Rep. Joel John Rep. Randy Friese Rep. Quang Nguyen Rep. Jake Hoffman Rep. Jennifer Pawlik Rep. Steve Kaiser Rep. Frank Pratt Rep. Aaron Lieberman Rep. Bret Roberts Rep. Quang Nguyen Rep. Athena Salman Rep. Becky Nutt Rep. Judy Schweibert Rep. Joanne Osborne Rep. Judy Schwiebert Ethics Rep. Michelle Udall Rep. Becky Nutt (Chair) Rep. Frank Pratt (Vice-Chair) Commerce Rep. Domingo DeGrazia Rep. Jeff Weninger (Chair) Rep. Alma Hernandez Rep. Steve Kaiser (Vice-Chair) Rep. Jacqueline Parker Rep. Joseph Chaplik Rep. David Cook Government & Elections Rep. Diego Espinoza Rep. John Kavanagh (Chair) Rep. Charlene Fernandez Rep. Jake Hoffman (Vice-Chair) Rep. Robert Meza Rep. Judy Burges Rep. Becky Nutt Rep. Kelli Butler Rep. Pamela Powers Hannley Rep. Frank Carroll Rep. Justin Wilmeth Rep. John Fillmore Rep. Jennifer Jermaine Criminal Justice Reform Rep. Jennifer Pawlik Rep. Walt Blackman (Chair) Rep. Kevin Payne Rep. Shawnna Bolick (Vice-Chair) Rep. Athena Salman Rep. Reginald Bolding Rep. Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Rep. Alma Hernandez Rep. Raquel Terán Rep. Joel John Rep. Jeff Weninger Rep. Bret Roberts Rep. Diego Rodriguez Health & Human Services Rep. Raquel Terán Rep. Joanne Osborne (Chair) Rep. Ben Toma Rep. Regina Cobb (Vice-Chair) Rep. Kelli Butler Rep. Joseph Chaplik Rep. Randy Friese Rep. Alma Hernandez Rep. Jacqueline Parker Rep. Amish Shah Rep. Justin Wilmeth Judiciary Natural Resources, Energy & Water Rep. Frank Pratt (Chair) Rep. Gail Griffin (Chair) Rep. Jacqueline Parker (Vice-Chair) Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • A Schema of Right-Wing Extremism in the United States
    ICCT Policy Brief October 2019 DOI: 10.19165/2019.2.06 ISSN: 2468-0486 A Schema of Right-Wing Extremism in the United States Author: Sam Jackson Over the past two years, and in the wake of deadly attacks in Charlottesville and Pittsburgh, attention paid to right-wing extremism in the United States has grown. Most of this attention focuses on racist extremism, overlooking other forms of right-wing extremism. This article presents a schema of three main forms of right-wing extremism in the United States in order to more clearly understand the landscape: racist extremism, nativist extremism, and anti-government extremism. Additionally, it describes the two primary subcategories of anti-government extremism: the patriot/militia movement and sovereign citizens. Finally, it discusses whether this schema can be applied to right-wing extremism in non-U.S. contexts. Key words: right-wing extremism, racism, nativism, anti-government A Schema of Right-Wing Extremism in the United States Introduction Since the public emergence of the so-called “alt-right” in the United States—seen most dramatically at the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017—there has been increasing attention paid to right-wing extremism (RWE) in the United States, particularly racist right-wing extremism.1 Violent incidents like Robert Bowers’ attack on the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in October 2018; the mosque shooting in Christchurch, New Zealand in March 2019; and the mass shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas in August
    [Show full text]
  • Az-Rep-20-2921
    December 11, 2020 VIA EMAIL Representative Warren Petersen Arizona State Capitol Complex 1700 W Washington St., Rm. 208 Phoenix, AZ 85007 wpetersen@azleg.gov Re: Public Records Request Dear Representative Petersen, Pursuant to the Arizona Public Records Law, A.R.S. §§ 39-121 et seq., American Oversight makes the following request for records. On November 30, 2020, members of the Arizona State Legislature met with President Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, for an unofficial hearing in which participants aired unsubstantiated allegations regarding the integrity of the presidential election.1 Many of these same legislators have since called for a special session to directly appoint representatives to the Electoral College.2 American Oversight seeks records with the potential to shed light on whether or to what extent Arizona officials are acting at the behest of external political actors. Requested Records American Oversight requests that your office promptly produce the following records: All text message chains/conversations, or message chains/conversations on messaging applications similar in form to text messages (such as Signal, WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Twitter DMs, etc.), between (a) Speaker Warren Petersen or his Chief of Staff, Michael Hunter, and (b) any of the external parties listed below. 1 Ryan Randazzo & Maria Polletta, Arizona GOP Lawmakers Hold Meeting on Election Outcome with Trump Lawyer Rudy Giuliani, Ariz. Republic (updated Nov. 30, 2020, 9:02 PM), https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/30/republican- lawmakers-arizona-hold-meeting-rudy-giuliani/6468171002/. 2 Maria Polletta, ‘Cowardly’ Say Some Arizona Republicans of Leaders Following Closure of Legislature, Ariz.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsa Fy2015 Foia Log 2013-Tsfo-01149 4/27/2015 2014-Tsfo-00434 2/24/2015 2015-Tsfo-00001 10/2/2014 2015-Tsfo-00002 10/2/2014 2015
    TSA FY2015 FOIA LOG Requester Company Request ID Received Date Requester Name Request Description Requested Date Name 2013-TSFO-01149 4/27/2015 ( b6 ) - copy of a video on August 10, 2011 of yourself at Eppley Airport in 9/13/2012 Omaha, NE and any other actions taken in this incident from TSA and airport personnel involved. 2014-TSFO-00434 2/24/2015 Udoye, Henry - USA federal publications including the entire public domain. 7/1/2014 2015-TSFO-00001 10/2/2014 Sandvik, Runa - All briefs, emails, records, and any other documents on, about, 9/30/2014 mentioning, or concerning the creation of the "TSA Randomizer" iOS app. 2015-TSFO-00002 10/2/2014 Seeber, Kristy - A copy of a current contract and winning proposal for Lockheed 9/30/2014 Martin Cooperation HSTS0108DHRM010 under the Freedom of Information Act. 2015-TSFO-00003 10/2/2014 Colley, David - Any and all documents, memoranda, notes or other records, which 9/30/2014 refer to, reflect or indicate how many individuals, if any, were contracted, interviewed or questioned based upon their carry suspicious packages or luggage through TSA security for the time period from 10:00am on September 21, 2013 to 11:59p.m., on September 21, 2013 at the Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport. 2015-TSFO-00004 10/2/2014 McManaman, Maxine - Office of Inspection,Report of Investigation I131029, to include, but 9/30/2014 limited to the entire file, witness statements, any communication about this case, electronic or otherwise. 2015-TSFO-00005 10/2/2014 ( b6 ) - A copy of your background investigation 9/24/2014 TSA FY2015 FOIA LOG Requester Company Request ID Received Date Requester Name Request Description Requested Date Name 2015-TSFO-00007 10/3/2014 Weltin, Dan - Requested Records: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD MEETING PUBLIC NOTICE and AGENDA REGULAR SESSION Tuesday, July 21, 2020 9:00 A.M
    GOLDER RANCH FIRE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD MEETING PUBLIC NOTICE AND AGENDA REGULAR SESSION Tuesday, July 21, 2020 9:00 a.m. 3885 East Golder Ranch Drive, Tucson, Arizona DUE TO COVID-19 AND RELATED PRECAUTIONS IN-PERSON ATTENDANCE IS PROHIBITED VIRTUAL MEETING- PLEASE SEE DETAILS BELOW Pursuant to ARS § 38-431.02, ARS § 38-431.03 and ARS § 38-431.05, the Golder Ranch Fire District Governing Board will meet in Regular Session that begins at approximately 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, July 21, 2020. The meeting will originate at the Fire District Administration Board Room, which is located at 3885 East Golder Ranch Drive, Tucson, Arizona. The order of the Agenda may be altered or changed by direction of the Board. The Board may vote to go into Executive Session, which are not open to the public, on any agenda item pursuant to ARS § 38-431.03(A )(3) for discussion and consultation for legal advice with the Fire District Attorney on the matter(s) as set forth in the agenda item. The following topics and any reasonable variables related thereto will be subject to discussion and possible action. 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL 2. SALUTE AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. FIRE BOARD REPORTS 4. CALL TO THE PUBLIC This is the time for the public to comment. Members of the Board are not permitted to discuss or take action on any item raised in the Call to the Public, which are not on the agenda due to restrictions of the Open Meeting Law; however, individual members of the Board are permitted to respond to criticism directed to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurors 2A–1 Tips for Effective Jury Instructions
    Online CLE From the Bench: Lessons Learned from Handling Jury Issues in High-Profile Cases 1.25 General CLE credits From the Oregon State Bar CLE seminar 26th Annual Litigation Institute and Retreat, presented on March 1 and 2, 2019 © 2019 The Honorable Anna Brown, The Honorable Julie Frantz. All rights reserved. ii Chapter 2A From the Bench: Lessons Learned from Handling Jury Issues in High-Profile Cases THE HONORABLE ANNA BROWN U.S. District Court, District of Oregon Portland, Oregon Contents Tips for Trial Lawyers re What Matters Most to Jurors . 2A–1 Tips for Effective Jury Instructions . 2A–9 Jury Management Documents Used in US v. Bundy . 2A–13 Redacted Jury-Management Order Including Discussion of Partial Sequestration. 2A–13 First Letter to Jurors Sent Together with Their Summonses . 2A–23 Second Letter to Jurors Sent Together with the Juror Questionnaire. 2A–27 Juror Questionnaire with Instructions and Oath, Attachments, and Download Instructions . 2A–29 Order Regarding Peremptory Challenges . 2A–73 Preliminary Order Regarding Media Motion for Disclosure of 9/7/16 Juror Identities, Including Language Addressing Concerns of 2/14/17 Parties Regarding Effect on Then-Upcoming 2/14/17 Jurors . 2A–77 Order Appointing Counsel for 9/7/16 Jurors Together with Letter Sent to Jurors . 2A–79 Chapter 2A—From the Bench: Lessons Learned from Handling Jury Issues in High-Profile Cases 26th Annual Litigation Institute and Retreat 2A–ii Chapter 2A—From the Bench: Lessons Learned from Handling Jury Issues in High-Profile Cases Tips for Trial Lawyers re What Matters Most to Jurors Anna J.
    [Show full text]
  • WAR in the WEST the Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right
    WAR IN THE WEST The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right A Special Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama JULY 2014 southern poverty law center WAR IN THE WEST The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist antigovernment activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok or Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Center is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center about the report Written by Ryan Lenz and Mark Potok Edited by Heidi Beirich Designed by Russell Estes, Shannon Anderson and Sunny Paulk Cover photos by Jim Urquhart/Reuters/Corbis and Ryan Lenz southern poverty law center table of contents Executive Summary 5 Guns of April: The Bundy Standoff 8 Backgrounding Bundy: The Movement 18 Land Use and the ‘Patriots’: A Timeline 22 southern poverty law center After the climbdown: Militiamen and other support- ers of Cliven Bundy head for the corral where govern- ment agents were holding the Nevadan’s cattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Protest Leader: FBI Planning a Raid
    Oregon protest leader: FBI planning a raid By Ralph Ellis, Holly Yan and Sara Sidner, CNN Updated 1910 GMT (0310 HKT) Jan ar! "# $01" % &ideo So rce: )** *o+ Playing-eader o. armed Oregon000 Armed protesters rall! to support Oregon rancher 3acis/ on the ranch and on the (ourt Bodyguard (ontinues )liven Bund! defense ,olitical .allout .rom *e4ada rancher )liven Bundy: Life in the /edia The rise and .all of )liven Bundy Now Playing Leader of armed Oregon protesters took federal loans The histor! of )liven and 1//on Bund! See inside (ontested Oregon .ederal building Armed Oregon protester speaks +ith )** Armed protesters ta6e o4er .ederal +ildli.e refuge Armed protesters rall! to support Oregon rancher 3acis/ on the ranch and on the (ourt Bodyguard (ontinues )liven Bund! defense ,olitical .allout .rom *e4ada rancher )liven Bundy: Life in the /edia The rise and .all of )liven Bundy Leader o. armed Oregon protesters took .ederal loans The histor! of )liven and 1//on Bund! See inside (ontested Oregon .ederal building Armed Oregon protester speaks +ith )** Armed protesters ta6e o4er .ederal +ildli.e refuge Armed protesters rall! to support Oregon rancher 'tor! highlights Protest leader Ammon Bundy +ants all .ederal land transferred to local residents Bund!# citing an nna/ed so rce# sa!s FBI plans raid to arrest protesters But la+ en.orcement appears to 5e +aiting o t t2e armed gro p Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon (CNN)A leader o. t2e armed gro p o(( pying a .ederal 5 ilding in Oregon said 2e's 5een told t2e FBI 2as o5tained 84e arrest +arrants and planned to raid t2e property -- an allegation t2at .ederal or local la+ en.orcement did not confirm.
    [Show full text]
  • Placing the Militia Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Harney County, Oregon
    Placing the Militia Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Harney County, Oregon Carolyn Gallaher School of International Service American University caroleg@american.edu Abstract This intervention examines the recent militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon. There is no consensus on how to place the group. Some commentators suggest the group was white supremacist. Others argue that it was animated by religious fanaticism. Still others emphasize the group’s grievances with the Bureau of Land Management. I argue here that the Malheur occupiers’ politics cannot be understood with reference to a single identity position. Rather, we need to focus on the group’s anti-government rhetoric because it funnels and shapes multiple interests at once. Here I examine how the group’s anti-government rhetoric frames race and class interests. In terms of race, I argue that anti-government rhetoric obscures the white interests behind the occupation. This concealment is based on a selective reading of history that emphasizes the end of settlement, when the government took ownership of land not claimed during the settlement period, instead of the stage leading up to it, when the government seized Indigenous land for white settlement. So construed, the occupiers could claim they were taking the ‘people’s’ land back from the government rather than engaging in a second round of white theft of Indigenous land. In terms of class, I argue that because the occupiers framed their fight as against government tyranny instead of as for privatization, the occupiers did not have to confront the inequities that come with privatization.
    [Show full text]