DOCSLIB.ORG

FSC-TPL-30-001 Application for a Temporary Derogation to Use a ‘Highly Hazardous’ Pesticide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FSC-TPL-30-001 Application for a Temporary Derogation to Use a ‘Highly Hazardous’ Pesticide FSC-TPL-30-001 Application for a temporary derogation to use a ‘highly hazardous’ pesticide A. General Requirements Application submission date Rain Forest Alliance Name and contact details of certification body submitting the derogation: Anita Neville 0431 913 214 [email protected] Soil Association Soil Association Woodmark South Plaza, Marlborough Street BRISTOL BS1 3NX Tel: + 44 (0)117 9142435 Email: [email protected] Forest Management and Controlled wood John Rogers [email protected] SCS Global Services 2000 Powell St., Suite 600 | Emeryville, CA 94608 USA tel: 510.452.8049 | fax: (510) 452 6882 [email protected] www.SCSglobalservices.com Active ingredient for which a temporary Alphacypermethrin CAS No 67375–30–8 derogation is being requested: Trade name and formulation type of the 4farmers Alpha-Cypermethrin 100 EC Pesticide: Insecticide Fastac Duo Insecticide EC Alpha-Scud Elite Insecticide EC Fastac Xcel Insecticide SC Echem Alpha-Cyp 100 Duo Insecticide EC Cropro Buzzard Insecticide EC Dominex Duo Insecticide EC Prevail Termiticide SC Imtrade Dictate Duo 100 Insecticide EC Kenso Agcare Ken-Tac 100 Insecticide EC Biotis Alpha 100 Insecticide EC Ospray Alpha-Cypermethrin 100 Insecticide EC Trade name and formulation type of the Chemforce Alpha-Cypermethrin 100 Pesticide (continued): Insecticide EC Wsd Alphacyper 100 EC Insecticide Titan Alpha Duo 100 Insecticide EC Country Alpha-Cypermethrin 100 Insecticide EC Grass Valley Alpha-Cypermethrin 100 Insecticide EC Aw Alf 100 EC Insecticide Googly Alpha-Duo 250 SC Insecticide Rygel Alpha-Cyper 100 EC Insecticide Unichoice 100 EC Insecticide Opal Alpha Duo Insecticide EC Rygel Alpha Forte 250 SC Insecticide Acp Alphacyp 100 Insecticide EC Mission Alpha-Cypermethrin 100 EC Insecticide Rainbow Alpha-Cypermethrin 100 Insecticide EC 4farmers Alpha Cypermethrin 250SC Insecticide Chieftain Duo 100EC Insecticide Titan Alpha-Cypermethrin 250 SC Insecticide Astound Duo TASMANIA Ground based application with various vehicles that use boom sprayers to target pests when trees are young and terrain is favourable. Aerial application where trees are older (trees >2m tall) and/or terrain is unsuitable for ground based vehicles 25 g per hectare. Method of application and the application ALL OTHER STATES equipment and intended quantities: Ground based application with various vehicles using boom sprayers when targeting pests at the establishment phase. Ground based application with various vehicles using boom sprayers or misters when targeting pests post establishment. Aerial application by fixed wing or helicopter. 25 g per hectare. A range of herbivorous insects, including, but not limited to: Common or Scientific name of the pest (or Chrysomelid leaf beetles, Cadmus beetles, description of the problem/issue, as applicable) Weevils, Shot hole miner, gum leaf skeletoniser, Cup moth, Sawfly’s, Spring beetles (heteronyx), Christmas beetles, Autumn gum moth Albany Plantation Forest Company Pty Ltd Certificate code SA-FM/COC-001378 License code FSC-C023801 Large Bunbury Fibre Plantations Pty Ltd Certificate CodeSA-FM/COC-001528 License CodeFSC-C014610 Large WAPRES Certificate CodeSCS-FM/COC-004647 License CodeFSC-C117107 Name and FSC certification codes of certificate Large holders1 requesting a temporary derogation. Please indicate scale category and whether it SFM Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd T/A qualifies as a SLIMF. SFM Forest Products Certificate CodeSA-FM/COC-002984 License CodeFSC-C102996 SLIMF PF Olsen (Aus) Pty Ltd Certificate Code SCS-FM/COC-004290 License Code: FSC-C111011 Large Australian BlueGum Plantation Ltd Certificate Code RA-FM/COC-001327 License CodeFSC-C019740 Large 1 In the case of forest management enterprises applying for FSC certification, the FSC certificate holder code can be provided at a later stage, if and when the company achieves certification. Forestry Tasmania Certification Pending. SCS Global Large Forico Certification Pending SCS Global Large Scope for which a temporary derogation is All states Tasmania, Victoria, South Australia, being requested: (Please attach map is Western Australia, Queensland. possible). Type of Forestry, species and expected forest Plantation. Eucalypt species including area where use of the HHP is intended. Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens and Eucalyptus smithii in Western Australia DEMONSTRATED NEED a) Please describe briefly the silvicultural system (methods for site preparation, practices for harvesting, regeneration, time between rotations) in the MU(s) included in the scope of the requested derogation. b) Please describe the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) system in place, including the plan to monitor the distribution and density of the targeted pest organisms in the MU(s). c) Please indicate the thresholds above which, the damages caused by the targeted pest organisms are classified as severe and how they have been established. d) Please indicate the population size of the targeted pest organism in the MU(s). e) (Fill in only if you represent a large-scale MU) Please indicate the conclusions of the comparative Cost/Benefit Analysis of using the requested pesticide versus other non-highly hazardous control alternatives, The cost – benefit analysis shall include, at minimum, the following scenarios: • no action vs. remedial control (short-term) • no action vs. preventive practices (long-term) f) (Fill in only if you represent a large-scale MU) Please provide a review carried out by independent experts of the Cost/Benefit Analysis in e). g) (Fill in only if you represent a medium or small-scale MU) Please describe possible non HHP alternatives to the use of the requested HHP and explain why they are not considered feasible to control the targeted pest organisms. h) Please include an estimate of the amount of area over which the pesticide is to be applied and how much of the pesticide is expected to be used annually. i) (Fill in only if you are applying for the renewal of a derogation) Please attach a report on the implementation of the IPM system during the previous derogation period, covering at minimum: derogation. Quantitative data of the use of ‘highly hazardous’ pesticides per year for the full period of the existing derogation, areas of application and application method. y and test alternatives to the ‘highly hazardous’ pesticide, and the results. Response In Australia, there are a wide range of insect pests that, if left un-managed, have the potential to cause commercially significant damage to tree crops (Elliot et al. 1998). Since they are grown within their natural range, eucalypts in particular are prone to damage from a large suite of native insects (Phillips 1996; Loch & Floyd 2001). Reported impacts from pest damage include tree mortality (e.g. Loch & Floyd 2001; Matthiessen & Bulinski 2001, Jordan et al. 2002), reduced tree growth (e.g. Candy et al. 1992; Elliot et al. 1993; Stone 1993; Elek 1997, 1999; Candy & Zalucki 2002; Collett & Neumann 2002) and reduced timber value/quality (Elliot et al. 1998; Phillips 1996). There is a wealth of literature showing that insect damage can cause substantial growth losses and volume losses to plantations (Loch and Matsuki, 2010; Collett and Neumann, 2002; Elek, 1997; Quentin et al., 2010). The volume losses depend on the amount of damage done and on the frequency with which damage occurs. Despite this, the Australian forestry industry has very few insecticides available that can be legally applied to prevent commercial loss caused by insect pest outbreaks. Based on our collective experience, this is predominantly due to the fact that chemical manufacturers view the forest industry as a commercially insignificant market to them (i.e. forestry is a low-volume user of product) and that it is not commercially viable to go through the rigorous and expensive process of extending label registrations for forestry. Indeed, the few forestry registrations that exist have only come about through a sustained effort from the forest industry to encourage manufacturers to go through the process. Historically, this effort has, in addition to general lobbying efforts, included voluntary contributions of funding, data and intellectual property to manufacturers. Alpha-cypermethrin is the only insecticide that is registered for use on a wide spectrum of pest species (listed above) in forestry situations across all Australian states. A few alternative products are registered for use on a much narrower range of species. An example of these includes fipronil for grasshoppers (although this is also on the FSC Highly Hazardous list) and for Autumn Gum Moth, the biological pesticide Mimic is registered. While these may be employed as part of an integrated management program for select species, there are significant limitations to their widespread adoption. For most species there is no selective insecticide available and consequently, a non-selective insecticide is required. Alpha-cypermethrin is the only non-selective insecticide registered for the purpose of controlling a broad range of insects in plantations. The most important part of the plantation cycle is the establishment process. From direct experience, a number of insects can occur in sufficient numbers to completely eliminate newly planted seedling crops, particularly spring beetles and wingless grasshoppers. Where these insects occur in large numbers and are not controlled, the crop can suffer sufficient mortality to require complete re- establishment, from weed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Morphology of the Female Genitalia and Some Abdominal Structures of Neotropical Cryptocephalini (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 7-19-2006 COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE FEMALE GENITALIA AND SOME ABDOMINAL STRUCTURES OF NEOTROPICAL CRYPTOCEPHALINI (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: CRYPTOCEPHALINAE) M. Lourdes Chamorro-Lacayo University of Minnesota Saint-Paul, [email protected] Alexander S. Konstantinov U.S. Department of Agriculture, c/o Smithsonian Institution, [email protected] Alexey G. Moseyko Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Chamorro-Lacayo, M. Lourdes; Konstantinov, Alexander S.; and Moseyko, Alexey G., "COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE FEMALE GENITALIA AND SOME ABDOMINAL STRUCTURES OF NEOTROPICAL CRYPTOCEPHALINI (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: CRYPTOCEPHALINAE)" (2006). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 2281. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/2281 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 60(2):113–134. 2006. COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE FEMALE GENITALIA AND SOME ABDOMINAL STRUCTURES OF NEOTROPICAL CRYPTOCEPHALINI (COLEOPTERA:CHRYSOMELIDAE:CRYPTOCEPHALINAE) M. LOURDES CHAMORRO-LACAYO Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota Saint-Paul, MN 55108, U.S.A. [email protected] ALEXANDER S. KONSTANTINOV Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature on the Chrysomelidae from CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, Numbers 1-41 October 1979 Through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (Rev
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-41 October 1979 through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (rev. 1)—(2,635 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions and additions are planned and will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. They Adobe Acrobat® 4.0 was used to distill the list into a PDF were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or file, which is searchable using standard search procedures. author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. If you want to add to the literature in this bibliography, Even though great care was taken during the data entering please contact me. All contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata de Gratiana spadicea (Klug, 1829) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, DuPortei, a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomel- Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. idae) with a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman 30(1):105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. Museum Collection. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenology of Eucalyptus Weevil, Gonipterus
    Agricultural and Forest Entomology (2006) 8, 155–165 Phenology of Eucalyptus weevil, Gonipterus scutellatus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), and chrysomelid beetles in Eucalyptus globulus plantations in south-western Australia A . D . Loch CSIRO Entomology, c/ – Department of Conservation and Land Management, Brain St, Manjimup, WA 6258, Australia and National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Locked Bag 588, Charles Sturt University, NSW 2678, Australia Abstract 1 In south-western Australia, Eucalyptus globulus plantations are defoliated by a complex of beetle species, yet only scant information exists on these species under such climatic conditions. To improve management of these defoliating beetles in the region, canopy fogging and shoot clipping were conducted in plan- tations between 1999 and 2002 to identify and document the phenology of the beetle species present. 2 Eucalyptus weevil, Gonipterus scutellatus , was the most common and destruc- tive defoliating beetle. Gonipterus scutellatus undergoes one principal generation each year with a lesser second generation or cohort in some seasons, which con- trasts greatly with reports of two to four annual generations for the species in other regions. This limited reproduction by G. scutellatus may be due to the limi- ted availability from summer onwards of new flushing foliage, which is essential for feeding and oviposition. 3 Several species of chrysomelid beetles were collected in plantations, but these were present in much lower numbers than G. scutellatus and were only a minor concern. However, some species, such as Chrysophtharta variicollis , appear to be capable of developing short-lived outbreaks. 4 A diverse suite of natural enemies was fogged from plantations but they were significantly less abundant than defoliating beetles and are not likely to provide significant control of beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Science Fellowship Report
    Acknowledgements and thanks We would like to thank all of our VOF volunteers who contributed to this project, especially those that made such an intensive field work season possible. Kevin Denham, a dedicated VOF Volunteer, acted as Meredith’s dependable and constant field assistant. Brody Receveur, an undergraduate statistics student at George Mason University, kindly helped with data analyses. We appreciate the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Division of Natural Heritage (DCR-DNH) for all of their previous work done within VOF’s Bull Run Mountains Natural Area Preserve (BRMNAP) and for openly sharing their technical insight, guidance, and expertise in relation to this project. Copperfox Distillery (based in Sperryville, Virginia) selflessly came to our rescue with a notable donation of ethanol preservative. This study project kicked-off just as a global supply shortage and production bottleneck of disinfecting agents was caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Without Copperfox’s generous contribution, our specimens would not have been able to be permanently preserved for further scientific study – and for that we will remain eternally grateful. We are eternally grateful for the research that has guided our previous entomological understanding of the Bull Run Mountains. The significant entomological work completed within the Bull Run Mountains by Dr. Arthur Evans, Dr. Oliver Flint, and Dr. Dave Smith is especially worth mentioning. Finally, we would like to thank all of those who engage with us online, come to our public events, and are taking the time to read this report. We appreciate each of you for opening your hearts and minds to our local six-legged kinfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Chrysomela from 1979 to 2003 Newsletters 1 Through 42
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-42 October 1979 through June 2003 (2,852 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Past Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, Adobe InDesign 2.0 was used to prepare and distill these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. the list into a PDF file, which is searchable using standard They were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or search procedures. If you want to add to the literature in author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. this bibliography, please contact the newsletter editor. All Even though great care was taken during the data entering contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata DuPortei, Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 30(1): a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with 105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman Museum Collec- tion. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1984. Karyotypic Analyses in Four summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera. Dtsch. Species of Hispinae (Col.: Chrysomelidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Do Artificial and Natural Defoliation Have Similar Effects on Physiology of Eucalyptus Globulus Labill
    Do artificial and natural defoliation have similar effects on physiology of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. seedlings? Audrey G. Quentin, Elizabeth A. Pinkard, Christopher L. Beadle, Timothy J. Wardlaw, Anthony P. O’Grady, Stephen Paterson, Caroline L. Mohammed To cite this version: Audrey G. Quentin, Elizabeth A. Pinkard, Christopher L. Beadle, Timothy J. Wardlaw, Anthony P. O’Grady, et al.. Do artificial and natural defoliation have similar effects on physiology of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. seedlings?. Annals of Forest Science, Springer Nature (since 2011)/EDP Science (until 2010), 2010, 67 (2), 10.1051/forest/2009096. hal-00883566 HAL Id: hal-00883566 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00883566 Submitted on 1 Jan 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ann. For. Sci. 67 (2010) 203 Available online at: c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2010 www.afs-journal.org DOI: 10.1051/forest/2009096 Original article Do artificial and natural defoliation have similar effects on physiology of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. seedlings? Audrey G. Quentin1,2*, Elizabeth A. Pinkard1,2,3, Christopher L. Beadle1,2,3, Timothy J. Wardlaw4, Anthony P. O’Grady1,5, Stephen Paterson 1,5, Caroline L.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaf Beetles Are Ant-Nest Beetles: the Curious Life of the Juvenile Stages Of
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 547: 133–164Leaf (2015) beetles are ant-nest beetles: the curious life of the juvenile stages... 133 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.547.6098 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Leaf beetles are ant-nest beetles: the curious life of the juvenile stages of case-bearers (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cryptocephalinae) Federico A. Agrain1, Matthew L. Buffington2, Caroline S. Chaboo3, Maria L. Chamorro4, Matthias Schöller5 1 Laboratorio de Entomología, IADIZA, CCT-CONICET, CC507, 5500, Av. A. Ruiz Leal s/n, Pque. Gral. San Martin, Mendoza, Argentina 2 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS-USDA, MRC 168, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution P.O. Box 37012, Washington, DC, 20013-7012, U.S.A. 3 Division of Entomology, 1501 Crestline Drive, Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, U.S.A. 4 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS-USDA, MRC 168, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution P.O. Box 37012, Washington, DC, 20013-7012, U.S.A. 5 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Faculty of Life Sciences, Lentzeallee 55/57, 14195 Berlin, Germany Corresponding author: Federico A. Agrain ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Schmitt | Received 26 June 2015 | Accepted 12 November 2015 | Published 17 December 2015 http://zoobank.org/2D10C2DB-0F8A-403C-A28E-50E63CC33F42 Citation: Agrain FA, Buffington ML, Chaboo CS, Chamorro ML, Schöller M (2015) Leaf beetles are ant-nest beetles: the curious life of the juvenile stages of case-bearers (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cryptocephalinae). In: Jolivet P, Santiago- Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 5. ZooKeys 547: 133–164.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of the Eucalypt Leaf Beetle, Cadmus Excrementarius Suffrian (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae), in Western Australia
    Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 85:161-164, 2002 Occurrence of the eucalypt leaf beetle, Cadmus excrementarius Suffrian (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae), in Western Australia N dos Anjos1, J D Majer2 & A D Loch3 1 Department of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Av PH Rolfs, s/n, CEP: 36571-000, Viçosa MG Brazil 2 Department of Environmental Biology, Curtin University of Technology, PO Box U1987, Perth WA 6845 3 CSIRO Entomology, 0 Department of Conservation, Brain Street, Manjimup WA 6258 email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Manuscript received April 2002; accepted August 2002) Abstract The chrysomelid beetle Cadmus excrementarius has recently been observed as a pest in south- western Australian blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus ssp globulus) plantations. The insect was first recorded from Western Australia in 1904 and has since been found at over 30 different locations in the State. Seven host species from the genera Eucalyptus and Corymbia have been recorded in Western Australia. Most records of C. excrementarius adults were in the months of January to March. The insect mainly occurs on blue gums in the area bounded by the jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest, where it may persist on flooded gum (Eucalyptus rudis) and to a lesser extent marri (Corymbia calophylla). E. marginata appears to be a less preferred host for C. excrementarius beetles, because its leaves were significantly less consumed than those of E. rudis and C. calophylla. Some observations on the natural history and predators of this beetle are presented. Keywords: Cadmus excrementarius, beetle, Chrysomelidae, Cryptocephalinae, eucalypt, blue gum plantation, pest, jarrah forest Introduction An understanding of the ecology and behaviour of C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.7.5 Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae Gyllenhal 1813
    Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae Gyllenhal 1813 81 New World Cryptocephalini (Coleoptera: Chryso- vas (Col., Chrysomelidae). – Revista Agronomia Noro- melidae: Cryptocephalinae). – Zootaxa 676: 1 – 46. este Argentino (Tucum á n) 2: 25 – 77. Chamorro-Lacayo, M. L., Konstantinov, A. S. – (1958): Notes on Lamprosomatinae (Chryso.). – & Moseyko, A. G. (2006): Comparative morphol- Coleopterists Bulletin 12: 29 – 33. ogy of the female genitalia and some abdominal – (1959): Los generos de Chrysomelidae. – Opera Lil- structures of neotropical Cryptocephalini (Coleop- loana 3: 1 – 337. tera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae). – Coleop- Reid, C. A. M. (1990): Systematics of the Australian terists Bulletin 60: 113 – 134. Cryptocephalinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Crowson, R. A. (1967): The Natural Classifi cation PhD. thesis. Australian National University, Acton. of the Families of Coleoptera. 187 pp. Classey, – (1995): A cladistic analysis of subfamilial relation- Hampton. ships in the Chrysomelidae sensu lato (Chrysom- Duckett, C. N., Gillespie, J. J. & Kjer, K. M. (2004): eloidea). Pp. 559 – 631 in Pakaluk, J. & S´ lipi n´ ski, S. Relationships among the subfamilies of Chrysome- A. (eds.) Biology, Phylogeny and Classifi cation of Cole- lidae inferred from small subunit ribosomal DNA optera: Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Roy A and morphology, with special emphasis on the Crowson, Vol. II . Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, relationship among fl ea beetles and the Galeruci- Warszawa. nae. Pp. 3 – 18 in Jolivet, J. S.-B. P. & Schmitt, M. – (2000): Spilopyrinae Chapuis: a new subfamily in (eds.) New Contributions in Biology of the Chrysomel- the Chrysomelidae and its systematic placement idae. Kugler Publications, The Hague. (Coleoptera). – Invertebrate Taxonomy 14: 837 – 862. Erber, D. (1988): Biology of Camptostomata Schmitt, M.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 60(1): 173–188 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Doi: 10.37520/Aemnp.2020.011
    2020 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 60(1): 173–188 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.37520/aemnp.2020.011 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Review of the genus-level names proposed by Johannes Gistel in Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) Jan BEZDĚK Mendel University, Department of Zoology, Zemědělská 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Accepted: Abstract. The genus-level names proposed by Johannes Gistel in Chrysomelidae are re- 13th February 2020 viewed. The genus Chloemela Gistel, 1856 is designated as a nomen oblitum for Chrysolina Published online: Motschulsky, 1860 (nomen protectum), and Alitene Gistel, 1856 is designated as a nomen 12th March 2020 oblitum for Neophaedon Jacobson, 1901 (nomen protectum). The following new synonymies are established: Donaciinae: Macroplea Samouelle, 1819 = Calamobia Gistel, 1856 syn. nov.; Criocerinae: Crioceris Geoffroy, 1762 = Anthurga Gistel, 1848 syn. nov.; Cassidinae: Hybosa Chevrolat, 1842 = Axis Gistel, 1848 syn. nov.; Botanochara Dejean, 1836 = Epicho- restes Gistel, 1848 syn. nov.; Notosacantha Chevrolat, 1836 = Festa Gistel, 1848 syn. nov.; Omocerus Chevrolat, 1836 = Homocera Gistel, 1848 syn. nov.; Basiprionota Chevrolat, 1836 = Monax Gistel, 1848 syn. nov.; Metazycera Chevrolat, 1836 = Scotias Gistel, 1848 syn. nov.; Cryptocephalinae: Disopus Chevrolat, 1836 = Disops Gistel, 1856 syn. nov.; Pachybrachis Chevrolat, 1836 = Pachybrachia Gistel, 1856 syn. nov.; Lachnaia Chevrolat, 1836 = Vervex Gistel, 1848 syn. nov. = Bucedestes Gistel, 1856 syn. nov.; Coptocephala Chevrolat, 1836 = Ecphorastes Gistel, 1856 syn. nov.; Labidostomis Chevrolat, 1836 = Labidostomus Gistel, 1848 syn. nov.; Eumolpinae: Bromius Chevrolat, 1836 = Chartonia Gistel, 1856 syn. nov.; Pachnephorus Chevrolat, 1836 = Euchthonius Gistel, 1856 syn. nov.; Metaxyonycha Chevrolat, 1836 = Herostrates Gistel, 1848 syn.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae, Lamprosomatinae)
    Comparative morphology of sclerites used by Camptosomatan leaf beetles for formation of the extrachorion (Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae, Lamprosomatinae) SCHÖLLER, M. Reprint from: Jolivet, P., Santiago-Blay, J. & Schmitt, M. (2008): Research on Chrysomelidae, Volume 1. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands, 432 pp., ISBN 978 90 04 15204 5. 2. Morphology and Anatomy Comparative morphology of sclerites used by Campto- somatan leaf beetles for formation of the extrachorion (Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae, Lamprosomatinae) Matthias Schöller1, 2 Abstract. All Camptosomata, i.e. the chrysomelid subfamilies Lamprosomatinae and Cryptocephalinae with its three tribes Clytrini, Cryptocephalini and Chlamisini (formerly ranked as subfamilies), provide their eggs with a case. The anatomical structures for doing so are sclerites embedded in chitinous pads on the female rec- tum, the whole structure is called rectal apparatus or kotpresse. The kotpresse of 86 species representing all tribes and subtribes of Camptosomata were studied and illus- trated, including all subgenera of Cryptocephalus. Based on the similarity of the pat- tern of rectal sclerites, several groups were recognised. The group Clytrini + Acolastus + Mylassa is characterised by two ventral and three dorsal sclerites, one being a cen- tral dorsal plate. Most species of Cryptocephalus studied and Melixanthus bear one ventral and two dorsal sclerites, as well as Coenobius + Isnus + Aprionota with addi- tionally strongly developed branches of the dorsal sclerites. Madacryptus and Stylo- somus bear two ventral and two dorsal sclerites. Another pattern can be found in the species-rich group Cadmus + Melatia + Aporocera + Chlamisini + Lamprosomatinae. A large ventral chitinpolster with or without two ventral sclerites is present, and a large dorsal chitinpolster with or without two dorsal sclerites.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea 165- 176 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;Download: SPIXIANA 18 165-176 München, Ol
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Spixiana, Zeitschrift für Zoologie Jahr/Year: 1995 Band/Volume: 018 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hawkeswood Trevor J., Samuelson G.A. Artikel/Article: Notes on some leaf beetles from the Passam area. Hast Sepik Province, and Port Moresby area. Central Province, Papua New Guinea 165- 176 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;download: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at SPIXIANA 18 165-176 München, Ol. Juli 1995 ISSN 0341-8391 Notes on some leaf beetles from the Passam area. Hast Sepik Province, and Port Moresby area. Central Province, Papua New Guinea (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) By T, J. Hawkeswood and G, A. Samuelson leaf Hawkeswood, T. J. & G. A. Samuelson (1995): Notes on some beetles from the Passam area. Hast Sepik Province, and Port Moresby area. Central Province, Papua New Guinea (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). - Spixiana 18/2: 165-176 A list and notes are provided on 27 species of Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) from primarily the Wewak-Passam area. Hast Sepik Province and secondarily from the Port Moresby area. Central Province, Papua New Guinea. Field observations were made from March to December 1989 by TJH. Host plants are recorded for 20 species or 74 % of all chrysomelids treated. Data on plant hosts are also reported. Resort, Hastings Point, South Trevor J. Hawkeswood, c/- North Star Caravan New Wales 2489, Australia. in Entomology, Bishop G. A. Samuelson, J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Research Museum, P. O. Box 19000-A, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, U.S.A. Introduction Plant host associations and the biology of New Guinean Chrysomelidae remain incompletely knov^n.
    [Show full text]