Evaluation of Paramedics Tasks and Equipment to Control the Risk of Musculoskeletal Injury

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of Paramedics Tasks and Equipment to Control the Risk of Musculoskeletal Injury FINDING SOLUTIONS Research at the Workers’ Compensation Board 1150-20 B 1999 (99FS-14) EVALUATION OF PARAMEDICS TASKS AND EQUIPMENT TO CONTROL THE RISK OF MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURY Ambulance Paramedics of British Columbia © 2001 Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia. All rights reserved. The Workers’ Compensation Board of B.C. encourages the copying, reproduction, and distribution of this document to promote health and safety in the workplace, provided that the Workers’ Compensation Board of B.C. is acknowledged. However, no part of this publication may be copied, reproduced, or distributed for profit or other commercial enterprise or may be incorporated into any other publication without written permission of the Workers’ Compensation Board of B.C. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained by contacting: Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia Publications & Videos Department 6711 Elmbridge Way Richmond, BC V7C 4N1 Phone (604) 276-3068 / Fax (604) 279-7406 Toll-free within BC – 1-800-661-2112 1150-20 A1999 (99FS-14 Evaluation of Paramedics Tasks and Equipment to Control the Risk of Musculoskeletal Injury Issue: Reducing the risk of musculoskeletal injury for paramedics. Agency: Ambulance Paramedics of British Columbia CUPE Local 873 Representative: Donald Cragg Funding: $49,500.00 Context: A paramedic’s work environment is often unpredictable. The confined space of the patient compartment, the task requirements, and the configuration of equipment within the patient compartment contribute to the risk of MSI. Currently there is little information regarding design guidance for ambulances and related equipment that is based on prevention of MSI through the application of ergonomic principles. Objective: To evaluate aspects of the main stretcher and patient compartment of the ambulance that contribute to the risk of musculoskeletal injury for paramedics, to priortize issues and suggest possible solutions, and to evaluate two of the suggested solutions. Design: The study had three phases. The initial phase, an evaluation of BC Ambulance Service’s (BCAS) ambulance design specifications and work performed by paramedics within the ambulance, included a questionnaire distributed to all BC paramedics, simulations of composite task scenarios, and simulations of individual task components. During the second phase, focus groups were used to prioritize issues and brainstorm possible solutions to the findings from the initial evaluation. The third phase was an evaluation of two potential solutions, the use of a mechanical lift assist (Antboxx) on the main stretcher and redesign and configurations of the jump kits. Setting: Ambulance stations throughout British Columbia, and the Chilliwack, BC driver-training course. Subjects: 269 BC paramedics responded to the questionnaire. The simulations, focus groups and solution evaluations involved paramedics from various BC locations and stakeholders from the union, Paramedic Academy and BCAS. Main Outcome Measures: The questionnaire analysis provided information on discomfort and injury patterns, and perceptions regarding causation of discomfort and injury and the design of the ambulance and stretcher systems. The simulations are summarized relative to specific awkward postures that were commonly observed and implications for injury. The focus groups prioritized the problem areas and brainstormed solutions. The evaluation the mechanical lift assists examined the changes in load and force required by the paramedics to lift and lower the stretcher and to load and unload from the ambulance. A cost-benefit analysis was also conducted. The evaluation of jump kit features gathered paramedic opinions on the importance of different kit features. Results: The questionnaire analysis identified lowering and lifting, pushing over rough terrain and loading into or out of the ambulance as the perceived most physically demanding aspects of using the stretcher. The most physically demanding aspects associated with transporting patients were conducting CPR, accessing patients, and accessing equipment. Paramedics identified the lower and upper back and neck as causing the greatest discomfort and the end of a typical shift, this was consistent with lost-time injury statistics. The task simulations identified ten activities that presented risk to the lower back and the concurrent risk factors and ten activities that presented risk to the upper back or shoulders and the concurrent risk factors. The focus groups not only gathered information but also raised awareness of musculoskeletal injury prevention. Two priority activities were selected at each focus group to brainstorm solutions. The priority areas differed for focus groups but those selected were: raising and lowering main stretcher, heavy patient on stretcher, load and unload stretcher, sitting in ambulance, bracing during transport, monitoring vitals, ride suspension, accessing cupboards, jump kit too heavy, and changing main oxygen. Evaluation of the Antboxx, a mechanical assistive device for stretchers, indicated that force levels required by paramedics to lift, lower or load the stretcher were lower that those required using an unassisted stretcher. The cost/benefit analysis showed that payback of the initial expenditure to outfit the stretchers currently used by BCAS with the Antboxx would require a 17% reduction in back injuries. Size, weight and placement of jump kits were determined to be the most important features in relation to reducing risk of MSI. Conclusion: The project identified numerous risks and potential solutions for consideration. Several solutions have been considered or were in the process of being implemented during the study. The Antboxx appears to present a viable solution to some of the risks associated with the stretcher. However, it is suggested that a pilot project should be conducted to track its efficacy relative to reducing back injuries and to identify training and logistical issues that will need to be addressed if the system is to be successful. Design and access changes to jump kits must target reducing the weight of the kits and improving the body mechanics while lifting or carrying the kits. Novel or alternative jump kit styles should be tested across regions and stations with varying needs to ensure consensus and to allow regional consideration in the selection of a solution. FINAL REPORT: FINDING SOLUTIONS GRANT 99FS-14 EVALUATION OF PARAMEDICS TASKS AND EQUIPMENT TO CONTROL THE RISK OF MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURY Prepared for: Grants and Awards Coordinator Workers' Compensation Board 8100 Granville Avenue Richmond, BC, V6Y 3T6 Prepared by: Ambulance Paramedics of British Columbia CUPE Local 873 Unit 2270, 21331 Gordon Way Richmond, BC, V6W 1J9 and: Ergonomics and Human Factors Group BC Research Inc. 3650 Wesbrook Mall Vancouver, BC, V6S 2L2 BCR Project No : 6-08-0793 November, 2000 Final Report: Finding Solutions Grant 99FS-14 i Acknowledgements The project was coordinated by Judy Letendre (BCAS paramedic and CUPE 873 member) and Dan Robinson (BC Research Inc./Robinson Ergonomics Inc.), with technical support from the Ergonomics and Human Factors Group at BC Research Inc., including Carmel Murphy, Joanna Zander, Will Jang, and Scott Davis. The following individuals made significant contributions that assisted in the completion of this project: BCAS paramedics and CUPE 873 members throughout the province who completed questionnaires. Stations who generously gave their time to provide task simulation and focus group information- UBC, Surrey, Chilliwack, Langley, Abbotsford, Pentiction, Kelowna, Vernon, Williams Lake, Quesnel, Prince Rupert. Jim Fissel, Manager Fleet Operations, BCAS. Trevor Timpson, Region 2 Safety Representative and Stretcher Maintenance. Tom Breiter, Manager, Safety Programs and Disaster Planning, BCAS. Don Cragg, CUPE 873. Roger Gibson, Unit Chief, BCAS. Wendy Warren, OSH Coordinator, Paramedic Academy. Wes Lowenberg, paramedic, BCAS. Eric McCooeye, Unit Chief, Qualicum Beach, BCAS. Doug Harstrom, Ferno-Washington. Wayne Burdeny, Stryker Corporation. Keith Wyss, Parr Emergency Products. Bill Bailey, Paramedic Academy. Brent Patriquin, Unit Chief, Prince Rupert and the Rupert crew for their continual support and input. Final Report: Finding Solutions Grant 99FS-14 ii Executive Summary The Ambulance Paramedics of BC (CUPE 873) with the support of BC Ambulance Service, and the technical assistance of BC Research Inc. have performed an evaluation of aspects of the main stretcher and patient compartment of the ambulance that contribute to the risk of musculo- skeletal injury for paramedics. This included the administration and analysis of a questionnaire to paramedics throughout the province, which provided valuable information regarding discomfort and injury patterns, as well as perceptions regarding causation of discomfort and injury, and design of the ambulance and stretcher systems. Simulations of composite task scenarios were conducted in a moving ambulance on a driver training range, and individual task components were simulated to evaluate risk factors for musculoskeletal injury that are associated with work in the patient compartment or involving the main stretcher. Focus groups were facilitated throughout the province to present preliminary results from the questionnaire and task simulations, which provided the foundation to prioritize issues and brainstorm possible solutions. Based on the outcome of these analyses, and considering knowledge of concurrent activities at BCAS
Recommended publications
  • EMS Medical Director Guidebook
    Medical Director Guidebook May 2016 Maine Emergency Medical Services Department of Public Safety 152 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333 www.maine.gov/ems Authors Christopher Paré, Paramedic J. Matthew Sholl, M.D., M.P.H. Eric Wellman, Paramedic Contributors Jay Bradshaw Jonnathan Busko, MD Myles Block, Paramedic Emily Carter, Paramedic Marlene Cormier, M.D. Shawn Evans, Paramedic Kevin Kendall, M.D. Rick Petrie, Paramedic Tim Pieh, M.D. Kerry Pomelow, Paramedic Mike Schmitz, D.O. Nate Yerxa, Paramedic Table of Contents Foreword 1 The Maine EMS System Structure 2 Legal Aspects & System Rules 6 EMS Systems 18 Maine EMS Medical Director Qualifications 23 Medical Oversight 31 EMS Personnel & Providers 36 EMS Operations 38 Interfacility Patient Transport 49 EMS Education 51 Grants & System Funding 55 Quality Assurance & System Improvement 57 Maine EMS Protocols & Standing Orders 65 Appendix A: Disaster Planning 70 Appendix B: Wilderness EMS 80 Appendix C: Tactical EMS 82 Appendix D: Death Situations for Medical Responders 83 Appendix E: Maine EMS Scope of Practice by License Level 88 Appendix F: Maine EMS Interfacility Transport: Decision Tree and Scope of Practice for Transfer by 93 License Level Appendix G: Recommended Service Policies 99 Appendix H: Checklist for the new medical director 100 References 101 Glossary of Acronyms 103 Index 104 FOREWORD The Maine EMS Medical Director’s Guidebook was designed to provide physicians and EMS services with direction on how to navigate the Maine EMS system. Our goal with this guidebook is to educate and in- form all users of the system to the role of EMS physician medical direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Paramedic Treatment Protocols
    Paramedic Treatment Protocols West Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services EMS Protocols Paramedic Treatment Protocol TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgments Using the Protocols INITIAL TREATMENT / UNIVERSAL PATIENT CARE TRAUMA 4100 Severe External Bleeding 4101 Selective Spinal Immobilization 4102 Chest Trauma 4104 Abdominal Trauma 4105 Musculoskeletal Trauma 4106 Head Trauma 4107 Hypoperfusion / Shock 4108 Traumatic Arrest 4109 Burns 4110 Eye Injuries 4111 Tranexamic Acid (TXA) 4112 CARDIAC 4200 Chest Pain 4202 Severe Hypertension 4203 Cardiac Arrest 4205 Tachycardia 4208 Symptomatic Bradycardia 4211 Right Ventricular AMI 4213 Return of Spontaneous Circulation - ROSC 4214 RESPIRATORY 4300 Bronchospasm 4302 Pulmonary Edema 4303 Inhalation Injury 4304 Airway Obstruction 4305 PEDIATRIC 4400 Medical Assessment 4401 Hypoperfusion / Shock 4402 Seizures 4403 Child Neglect / Abuse 4404 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome 4405 Cardiac Arrest 4406 West Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services – Statewide Protocols Page 1 of 3 Paramedic Treatment Protocol TABLE OF CONTENTS Cardiac Dysrhythmias 4407 Trauma Assessment 4408 Fever 4409 Newborn Infant Care 4410 Pediatric Diabetic Emergencies 4411 Allergic Reaction / Anaphylaxis 4412 Bronchospasm 4413 ENVIRONMENTAL 4500 Allergic Reaction / Anaphylaxis 4501 Heat Exposure 4502 Cold Exposure 4503 Snake Bite 4504 Near Drowning / Drowning 4505 MEDICAL 4600 Hypoperfusion / Shock 4601 Stroke / TIA 4602 Seizures 4603 Diabetic Emergencies 4604 Unconscious / Altered Mental Status 4605 Overdose / Ingestion
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Paramedic Services
    CAPITAL PROGRAM SUMMARY 2015 – 2024 CAPITAL BUDGET AND PLAN OVERVIEW Toronto Paramedic Services (PS) is responsible for providing 24-hour emergency pre-hospital and out-of- hospital medical care and transportation to individuals experiencing injury or illness. Toronto Paramedic Services currently operates 45 ambulance stations which includes 5 service district centres, and the Toronto Paramedic Services' headquarters that have a total area of just over 289,056 sq. ft. and an Toronto Paramedic Services estimated replacement value of $122.569 million. toronto.ca/budget 2015 The 2015–2024 Capital Budget and Plan of $71.123 million focuses on the lifecycle replacement of major medical and Highlights communications equipment as well as addresses the increase in service demands due to a growing and aging Toronto population Overview & Recommendations by investing in the purchase of additional ambulance vehicles I: 10-Year Capital Plan 6 and construction of 3 new stations that will provide multi- function facilities for staff and vehicles to improve the efficient II: 2015 Capital Budget 16 use of City land/assets and more effective use of paramedic III: Issues for Discussion 20 resources. Appendices: 1. 2014 Performance 24 2. 10-Year Capital Plan Summary 27 3. 2015 Capital Budget; 2016-2024 Capital Plan 28 4. 2015 Cash Flow & Future Year Commitments 29 5. 2015 Capital Projects with Financing Detail 30 6. 2015 Reserve / Reserve Fund Review 31 toronto.ca/budget 2015 Page 2 2015 Capital Budget Toronto Paramedic Services Capital Spending and Financing Where does the money go? The 2015–2024 Capital Budget and Plan totals 2015-2024 Capital Budget and Plan by $71.123 million that will fund the following Expenditures Category major capital projects over the 10-year period: .
    [Show full text]
  • Kern County Sheriff's Office Search and Rescue Policies and Procedures Table of Contents
    KERN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SEARCH AND RESCUE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ______________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________________________________ A -- INTRODUCTION A-100 Introduction-Mission Statement A-110 Manual Revisions A-200 Definitions A-300 Organizational Structure B -- RESPONSIBILITIES OF PERSONNEL B-100 Duties of Search and Rescue Coordinator B-200 Duties of Search and Rescue Members C -- SELECTION OF SEARCH AND RESCUE MEMBERSHIP C-100 Selection of Members C-200 Probationary Period C-300 Leave of Absence C-400 Termination D -- SEARCH AND RESCUE RANK STRUCTURE D-100 Rank Structure and Responsibilities D-200 Rank Insignia E -- SEARCH AND RESCUE TRAINING E-100 Training E-200 Training Forecast E-300 Training Documentation F -- SEARCH AND RESCUE MEETINGS F-100 Meetings Page 1 of 1 _____________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________________________________ G -- ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES G-100 Call-Out Procedures - In County G-200 Call-Out Procedures - Mutual Aid G-300 Aircraft Operations G-400 Incident Command System G-500 Uniforms and Appearance G-600 Donations and Grants G-700 Discipline G-800 Firearms G-900 Injuries G-1000 Media Relations G-1100 Medical Responsibilities G-1200 Member Compensation G-1300 Vehicle Operation G-1400 SAR BLS Policy Page 2 of 2 Page 3 of 3 KERN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SEARCH AND RESCUE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
    [Show full text]
  • CEMS Paramedic Ambulance CFD Rescue Squad Conclusions
    CEMS Paramedic Ambulance CFD Rescue Squad Annual cost with topped out medics: Annual cost with topped out firefighters: $664,082 $1,370,349 Personnel per ambulance: 2 Firefighters per rescue squad: 4 Top out paramedic pay: $60,254 Firefighter top out pay: $63,683 Vehicle Cost 2020: $276,930 Vehicle Cost 2020: $676,943 Dual response with CFD: YES Dual response with CEMS: YES Statistics for 2012 (the last year rescue squads transported) Total ambulances: 15 Total rescue squads: 4 Total patient transports: 63,444 Total patient transports: 649 Average annual transports per unit: 4,229 Average annual transport per unit: 162 Average transports per unit per day: 11.5 Average transports per unit per day: 0.4 Paitents transported by ambulance in 2012 1% 99% CEMS transports Rescue transports Conclusions: While they provide important technical rescue capabilities such as collapse, water, and rope rescue, CFD Rescue Squads are not an efficient means of providing ambulance transport to the hospital. Although the annual cost of each CFD Rescue Squad is double the cost of CEMS ambulance, all 4 rescue squads combined transported only 1% of the patient volume during 2012, the last year that Rescue Squads provided patient transport services. Heavy and Technical Rescue Units across the United States Heavy Rescue or Technical Rescue Units are often elite units where members are specially trained in many disciplines such as rope rescue, scuba, swift water rescue, advanced auto extrication, and collapse rescue. Many are assigned to respond to every working fire and technical rescue incident. There are slight variations on this model, as illustrated by some examples below.
    [Show full text]
  • MASS CASUALTY TRAUMA TRIAGE PARADIGMS and PITFALLS July 2019
    1 Mass Casualty Trauma Triage - Paradigms and Pitfalls EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Emergency medical services (EMS) providers arrive on the scene of a mass casualty incident (MCI) and implement triage, moving green patients to a single area and grouping red and yellow patients using triage tape or tags. Patients are then transported to local hospitals according to their priority group. Tagged patients arrive at the hospital and are assessed and treated according to their priority. Though this triage process may not exactly describe your agency’s system, this traditional approach to MCIs is the model that has been used to train American EMS As a nation, we’ve got a lot providers for decades. Unfortunately—especially in of trailers with backboards mass violence incidents involving patients with time- and colored tape out there critical injuries and ongoing threats to responders and patients—this model may not be feasible and may result and that’s not what the focus in mis-triage and avoidable, outcome-altering delays of mass casualty response is in care. Further, many hospitals have not trained or about anymore. exercised triage or re-triage of exceedingly large numbers of patients, nor practiced a formalized secondary triage Dr. Edward Racht process that prioritizes patients for operative intervention American Medical Response or transfer to other facilities. The focus of this paper is to alert EMS medical directors and EMS systems planners and hospital emergency planners to key differences between “conventional” MCIs and mass violence events when: • the scene is dynamic, • the number of patients far exceeds usual resources; and • usual triage and treatment paradigms may fail.
    [Show full text]
  • Paramedic Physical Demands Analysis
    Paramedic Shysical Gemands Dnalysis Prepared by: %UHQGDQ&RIIH\5HQpH0DF3KHHDQGSteve Fischer Queen’s University 8QLYHUVLW\$YH .LQJVWRQ21 ./1 3:*6&&RQWUDFW1XPEHU&663&' &RQWUDFWScientific Authority: Doug Socha DRDC Centre for Security Science 613-947-1113 The scientific or technical validity of this Contract Report is entirely the responsibility of the Contractor and the contents do not necessarily have the approval or endorsement of the Department of National Defence of Canada. DRDC-RDDC-2014-C JuO\2014 IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS CSSP-2013-CD-1088Paramedic Physical Demands Analysis was supported by the Canadian Safety and Security Program (CSSP) which is led by Defence Research and Development Canada’s Centre for Security Science, in partnership with Public Safety Canada. The project was led by Paramedic Association of Canada in collaboration with Paramedic Chiefs of Canada CSSP is a federally-funded program to strengthen Canada’s ability to anticipate, prevent/mitigate, prepare for, respond to, and recover from natural disasters, serious accidents, crime and terrorism through the convergence of science and technology with policy, operations and intelligence © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2014 © Sa Majesté la Reine (en droit du Canada), telle que représentée par le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2014 Abstract …….. Paramedics must complete many physically demanding activities in order to provide essential emergency medical care. While most paramedic and emergency medical services have an indication of the physical demands faced by their own paramedics, a national physical demands profile does not exist. A national profile would help to identify points of commonality and difference between services that might be useful to know when considering process and practice improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL of Health & Life Sciences
    Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law VOLUME 4, NUMBER 2 FEBRUARY 2011 TABLE OF Meet the Fraud Busters: Program Safeguard Contractors CO N TE N TS and Zone Program Integrity Contractors ................................. 1 by Sara Kay Wheeler, Stephanie L. Fuller, and J. Austin Broussard The Link Between Quality and Medical Management: Physician Tiering and Other Initiatives .................................. 36 by Rakel Meir and Paul W. Shaw Medical Control of Emergency Medical Services .................. 65 by Rick L. Hindmand and W. Ann Maggiore Quality in Action: Paradigm for a Hospital Board- Driven Quality Program .......................................................... 95 by Elisabeth Belmont, Claire Cowart Haltom, Douglas A. Hastings, Robert G. Homchick, Lewis Morris, Robin Locke Nagele, Kathryn C. Peisert, Brian M. Peters, Beth Schermer, and Julie Taitsman NOTES A N D The Employee Exceptions to the Anti-Kickback and COMME N TS Stark Laws After Tuomey: What’s a Physician’s Employer To Do? ..................................................................... 146 by Susan O. Scheutzow and Steven A. Eisenberg PRACTICE Data Privacy Concerns for U.S. Healthcare RESOURCE Enterprises’ Overseas Ventures ............................................. 173 by Vadim Schick Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law 65 Medical Control of Emergency Medical Services Rick L. Hindmand and W. Ann Maggiore ABSTRACT: Effective medical control by medical directors and other medical oversight professionals is an essential element in providing appropri- ate emergency medical services (EMS). Within an EMS system, EMS medical directors have a supervisory rather than agency relationship with the emer- gency medical technicians (EMTs). Contrary to some commentary on the legal framework of this relationship, EMTs do not practice “under the license” of the medical director, but instead practice pursuant to their own state or county licenses, which generally require physician supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccination Toolkit for EMS Medical Directors
    VaccinationVaccination ToolkitToolkit forfor EMSEMS MedicalMedical DirectorsDirectors George Lindbeck, MD Virginia State EMS and Trauma Systems Medical Director HistoricalHistorical PerspectivePerspective In the past, vaccine administration has not been considered part of the routine scope of practice of EMS providers in the Commonwealth EMS providers have generally been held to function within a scope of practice that enables them to provide immediate care in emergencies, not elective or preventive care HistoricalHistorical PerspectivePerspective EMS providers could administer vaccine only in the circumstance of an emergency declared by the Governor and following specific authorization and direction provided by the Commissioner of Health HistoricalHistorical PerspectivePerspective During the recent H1N1 epidemic concerns arose regarding the ability of existing mechanisms and resources to adequately meet the needs for delivery of influenza vaccine both to first responders, including fire/rescue personnel and law enforcement, and to the general public raising the possibility of utilizing EMS providers as vaccinators CurrentCurrent LegalLegal BasisBasis Recent changes in the Code of Virginia amended the previous language of laws pertaining to the administration of vaccines, including language specific to the administration of vaccine to minors, that included certain EMS providers as approved vaccinators CurrentCurrent LegalLegal BasisBasis § 32.1-46.02. Administration of influenza vaccine to minors. The Board shall, together with the Board
    [Show full text]
  • PS COMMITTEE #2 April 29, 2021 Revised Worksession MEMORANDUM April 26, 2021 TO
    PS COMMITTEE #2 April 29, 2021 Revised Worksession M E M O R A N D U M April 26, 2021 TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Susan J. Farag, Legislative Analyst SUBJECT: Worksession: FY22 Operating Budget and FY21-26 CIP Amendments Montgomery County Fire and Rescue Service (MCFRS) PURPOSE: Vote on Recommendations for Council’s Consideration Those expected for this worksession: Chief Scott Goldstein, MCFRS Dominic Del Pozzo, Division Chief, MCFRS Rachel Silberman, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Budget Summary • There are no proposed service cuts in the FY22 Recommended Operating Budget. • There are 10 new Paramedic Training Positions that help address understaffing. • There are one new Paramedic Chase Car and one new Daywork Ambulance to enhance EMS Service Delivery. • The Fire Department audit will be split into two studies, one for operations and one for racial equity and social justice, at a total cost of $200,000. • The Executive’s March 15 amendments to the Capital Improvements Program has minor adjustments to several projects. Overview For FY22, the County Executive recommends total expenditures of $232,685,066 for MCFRS, a 3.5% increase from the FY21 Approved Budget of 224,995,408. FY20 FY21 FY22 CE % Change Actual Approved Recommended FY21-22 Expenditures by fund Fire Tax District $244,508,043 $224,869,427 $232,685,066 3.5% Grant Fund $3,355,713 $125,981 $0 -100.0% TOTAL Expenditures $247,863,756 $224,995,408 $232,685,066 3.4% Positions: Full-time 1317 1318 1,327 0.7% Part-time 0 0 0 -- TOTAL Positions 1317 1318 1327 0.7% TOTAL FTEs 1318.26 1319.26 1,328.26 0.7% The FY20 County Executive’s recommendation is a net increase of $7,815,639.
    [Show full text]
  • NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Public Board Meeting November
    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Public Board Meeting November 2018 Item 19 THIS PAPER IS FOR NOTING CLINICAL GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MINUTES OF 13 SEPTEMBER 2018 AND VERBAL REPORT OF 15 NOVEMBER 2018. Lead Director Martin Togneri, Chair of Clinical Governance Committee Author Lindsey Ralph, Board Secretary Action required The Board is asked to note the minutes and verbal report. Key points In compliance with the Service’s Standing Orders, the approved Committee minutes are submitted to the Board for information and consideration of any recommendations that have been made by the Committee. The minutes of the Clinical Governance Committee held on 13 September 2018 were approved by the Committee on 15 November 2018. A verbal update of the meeting held on 15 November 2018 will be provided by the Chair of the Committee. Timing A verbal update of the most recent Committee meeting will be provided to the Board. Minutes are presented following approval by the Committee. Doc: 2018-11-28 Clinical Governance Committee Page 1 Author: Board Secretary Date: 2018-11-28 Version 1.0 Review Date: N/A MINUTE OF THE SEVENTY SECOND (72nd) CLINICAL GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE AT 10.00 AM ON THURSDAY 13 SEPTEMBER 2018 IN MEETING ROOM 2.12 (19), NHQ Present: Martin Togneri, Non Executive Director (Chair) Irene Oldfather, Non Executive Director Francis Tierney, Non Executive Director In Attendance Keith Colver, Clinical Governance Manager Derek Louttit, Clinical Risk Manager Mark Hannan, Head of Corporate Affairs and Engagement Claire McTaggart, Scott Moncrieff Tom
    [Show full text]
  • Careers in the Ambulance Service Make a Difference Careers in Healthcare Science 2
    Join the team and Careers in the ambulance service make a difference Careers in healthcare science 2 Welcome to the NHS The NHS offers a huge range of exciting and challenging opportunities for people who are passionate about making a difference. With more than 350 different careers on offer, there is a job for you no matter what your interests, skills or qualifications. What’s more, you’ll be given every opportunity to build on your skills and learn new ones as part of the Career Framework – a system that demonstrates our commitment to skills development. See pages 10 and 11 for more information about this. Scientists, accountants, porters, psychologists, nurses, information technologists and estate managers, to name but a few, are all needed to ensure the smooth running of the NHS. These people, and many more, work together as a team to deliver the very best care for our patients. To find out more about becoming a member of the NHS team, call 0345 60 60 655, email [email protected] or visit www.nhscareers.nhs.uk We look forward to hearing from you! Contents 2 The NHS – a rewarding place to work 12 What opportunities are available? Benefits Ambulance care assistants Pay and conditions Assistant practitioners Work-life balance Call handlers Emergency medical dispatchers 6 Your career in the ambulance service Paramedics Patient transport services controllers 10 Career Framework Senior paramedics Developing your career in the NHS 16 Getting started NHS Constitution Entry level/assistant roles Graduate opportunities and approved courses Work placements 19 What’s your next step? Foreword In this booklet you’ll learn about the exciting range Whatever your academic background, preferences of opportunities that today’s ambulance service has and interests, if you would like to help others in a to offer.
    [Show full text]