2011–12 30 June 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2011–12 30 June 2012 National Judicial College of Australia PO Box 8102 ANU ACT 2601 Tel: (02) 6125 6655 Fax: (02) 6125 6651 www.njca.com.au Annual Report 2011–12 30 June 2012 To: The Council of Chief Justices of Australia and New Zealand The Standing Council of Law and Justice I am pleased to send to you, in accordance with clause 17 of the Constitution of the National Judicial College of Australia, a report by the Council of the College on the operations of the College during the financial year 2011-2012. This is the College’s tenth annual report. Yours sincerely Contents Foreword by the Chair of the NJCA Council. .1 College Professional Development Programs 2011/2012. 3 Judgment Writing Program. 3 Phoenix Magistrates Program . .3 Judicial Leadership Program. .4 National Judicial Orientation Program. 4 Facilitation Skills Program. .5 Current Issues in Federal Crime and Sentencing Conference. .5 Managing Discovery Seminar . .6 360 degree feedback program . 6 Solution Focused Judging Program. .6 Witness Assessment Program. 6 Support for court judicial education activities. 7 Indigenous cultural awareness programs. 7 Social and cultural awareness . .7 Plans for professional development programs 2012/2013. .7 International Organisation for Judicial Training. 8 Online Clearinghouse on Judicial Education. .8 Oral Decisions Anthology. .8 Commonwealth Sentencing Database . .9 NJCA website. 9 College Administration 2011/2012. .9 NJCA Council. 9 Programs Advisory Committee . 9 Regional Convenors . .10 Program Planning Committees. 10 Planning Meeting February 2012. 10 The College and the Australian National University . .11 College funding. .11 College Secretariat. .11 Communication with the College. 11 Attachments Foreword by on the subject of case management. A significant component of that programme A Council, Regional Convenors. 12 the Chair of the will be focused upon the management of B Members of Policy Committees. 14 NJCA Council discovery in complex commercial cases. C Members of Program Planning Committees. .15 The curriculum will be informed by the This report catalogues the many D College Secretariat. .19 presentations and discussion during programmes presented and activities the seminar on the subject of managing undertaken by the College during discovery presented in conjunction with another busy year. Viewed as a whole, the Australasian Institute of Judicial the year could be seen as a period of Administration in March 2012. consolidation, building upon the strategic The year has not been without its repositioning undertaken in preceding disappointments. Once again, our years, and realising the benefits of the attempts to attract funding to enable the faculty development and facilitation skills College to play a role in the co ordination programmes delivered in those years. and over sight of the provision of judicial The development of a substantial body education programmes to judges and of trainers skilled and experienced in magistrates of other countries within our the planning and presentation of adult region was unsuccessful. The provision education programmes has enhanced of judicial education by Australian the quality and value of the programmes Judges and Magistrates to the judicial delivered by the College. A number of officers of other countries within our the programmes which we deliver on a region continues to be somewhat ad hoc regular basis, such as the National Judicial and unstructured. It is not specifically Orientation Programme and the Phoenix aligned with Australia’s strategic Magistrates’ Programme, have been interests. The College considers that it reviewed and are undergoing revision is well placed to co ordinate responses utilising the various skills that have been to requests for assistance from courts acquired in the field of adult education. in other countries, and to ensure that appropriate standards are maintained in Those skills have also been invaluable the delivery of programmes in response in the development of new programmes to those requests. However, the College which will be presented in the coming has consistently maintained the view that years. The most advanced of those unless additional funding is provided to programmes is the programme entitled enable the College to undertake that role, “Dialogues on being a Judge”, which is to deployment of our limited resources in be delivered in South Australia in October that field would significantly detract from 2012. The programme is designed to our core business, which is the delivery provide a broader educational programme of programmes to Australian judges and for judges who have been serving for five magistrates. The College will nevertheless or more years. continue to pursue our requests for Another programme at a relatively early funding to enable us to undertake a role in stage of development is a programme this important area. Annual Report 2011 – 2012 1 I am pleased to report that the College’s to the work of the College since its creation College Professional The Programs Advisory Committee of relationship with the Australian National I am very pleased to be leaving the role of Development Programs the College, and individual planning University College of Law remains the Chair of Council in such good hands, committees for programs, routinely review as strong as ever. Another successful and wish John every success in his new 2011/2012 and revise College programs in the light national conference was jointly presented role. I am sure that he will find the role to The College continues to present judicial of feedback from participants. The College by the two Colleges in February 2012, be as interesting and stimulating as I have. professional development programs seeks written feedback from participants and planning for next year’s conference around Australia and to develop in its programs. The responses continue to is underway. indicate that participants have been very The Honourable Wayne Martin AC new programs. satisfied with the programs. The College depends very largely upon Chief Justice of Western Australia Most College programs use structured the generous donation of time and energy The College develops new programs on Chair of the NJCA Council discussion of practical problems in small by many judges and magistrates around groups. This focus on interactive learning the basis of proposals made by judicial Australia, without whom the College 30 June 2012 rather than lectures means that most officers when evaluating programs they would be unable to function. I would like College programs are for groups of no attend, by program planning committees, to again take this opportunity to express more than 25 to 30 participants. The use of and by government agencies. The College my appreciation to all who assisted the these techniques involves presenters and Programs Advisory Committee advises on College during the year under report. College staff in considerably more work and develops new programs and reviews existing programs. Once again the College was also than would be involved in organising a series of lectures. However the Council dependent upon the extraordinary Judgment Writing Program dedication and enthusiasm of a small of the College remains convinced that secretariat. The resources of that presenting a small number of high quality In August 2011 the College presented a secretariat have been augmented by the programs of long term educational three day judgment writing program in addition of expertise in the field of adult value remains the best use of the Glenelg South Australia. The objective of education by the employment of Ms Jenny College’s resources. the program was to enable participants Green as Academic Director. The benefits The College has also presented suitable to improve their judgment writing of Jenny’s expertise in the field of adult topics to larger groups in the traditional skills through analysis, discussion and education are being realised in many of conference style. The Current Issues in rewriting of their judgments in small our programmes. I would like to express Federal Crime and Sentencing Conference groups. The groups were assisted by my appreciation for the contributions presented in Canberra in February 2012, professional writers and senior judges. made by all members of the secretariat is an example of this kind of event which Group work is interspersed with lectures during the year under report. has a multi disciplinary audience of from writers and judicial officers on particular aspects of judgment writing. It has been my very great pleasure to serve judicial officers, academics, government Sixteen judicial officers from Federal and as Chair of the Council of the College officers and others with an interest in State courts attended. Feedback from the for four years. Under the Constitution of learning about the latest research and participants indicates the program was the College, that is the maximum term developments in a field directly relevant to very successful. that can be served by any member of the the work of the courts. Council, and I will be standing down from Judges and magistrates from all courts Phoenix Magistrates the Council on 30 June 2012. I am pleased in Australia are eligible to attend College Program to report that my place as Chair of Council programs. Some programs are limited to will be taken by Justice John Byrne of the particular categories of the judiciary (for The Phoenix Magistrates Program was Supreme Court of Queensland. Justice example orientation programs are limited presented in August 2011 in Broadbeach, Byrne has made an enormous contribution to recent appointees). Queensland. This was the ninth year 2 National Judical College of Australia Annual Report 2011 – 2012 3 the program has been presented. Nine emphasise the sharing of views and Facilitation Skills Program Current Issues in Federal participants were new appointees. The experience by participants. Based on Crime and Sentencing remaining nine participants were more the participants’ evaluation comments, In December 2011 the College conducted experienced magistrates who attended to the program was successful in meeting a Facilitation Skills Program for judicial Conference officers.
Recommended publications
  • 2 Col 05 May 2017 Clarion.Pages
    Below, the lead author is identified for each, though in some CLArion No 1705 – 01 May 2017 cases a number of others (mostly Board Members of CLA), Email newsletter of Civil Liberties Australia (A04043) have contributed to the submission. In the case of our Email: Secretary(at)cla.asn.au Web: http://www.cla.asn.au/ submission on modern slavery, CLA member Felicity Gerry QC ___________________________________ brought world expert status to our contribution. Any member can volunteer to help write a submission, or Parliament must be empowered to decide contribute a sentence, a paragraph or a page to one that interests you. Email the secretary (address above) if you would on Australia going to war like to. Urgent legislation to change the way Australia decides to go to • Human right to freedom of religion and belief: Joint war should be passed this month. Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Currently, the Prime Minister alone is responsible for the Trade (JSCFADT) 170322 – Rajan Venkataraman (RV) decision, which is usually taken in consultation with his or her • Legislation to combat modern slavery: JSCFADT 170413 “kitchen cabinet” of three or four top advisors. Those consulted – Felicity Gerry QC are frequently the Deputy PM, the Attorney-General and the • Need for a national integrity commission: Select Cttee Treasurer, but any of the PM’s close inner circle may also be 170407 – Bill Rowlings involved. • Recognition of Indigenous people in the constitution: With President Donald Trump prepared to commit the US to Referendum Council 170409 – RV unilateral action anywhere in the world, Australia has never • Same-sex Marriage Bill: Select Cttee on Exposure Draft needed an “opt out” capability more than we do today.
    [Show full text]
  • Downunderaliover Developments Around Australia
    REGULARS DownUnderAlIOver Developments around Australia unable to give written permission to be mentally examined'. When it was discovered that Ms Rau was in fact Australian, she was taken to Adelaide and provided with proper medical treatment. As Ms Rau's sister cleverly put it: 'During which 'Don't leave home without your passport' leg of her flight from Baxter to Adelaide did she suddenly gain the basic human right to medical treatment?'. Asylum seekers The recent revelation that an Australian woman, Cornelia experiencing mental illness continue to be denied proper Rau, was wrongfully detained in a Queensland prison and medical treatment while in detention and their cries for help then at Baxter lmmigration Detention Centre for a total often go unnoticed because their status as 'illegals' makes them period of almost I I months certainly embarrassed the Federal invisible and forgotten. The only good thing to come out of Government, though not enough for it to issue an apology to Ms Rau's detention and deplorable treatment is that it throws Ms Rau and her family. some light on the forgotten 'illegals', especially those with The wrongful detention of Ms Rau aptly demonstrates the mental illness. (Sources: Sydney Morning Herald, 7 February 'detain now, ask questions later' approach of police and 2005) immigration authorities. Section 189 of the Migration Act SERA MIRZABEGIAN is a Sydney lawyer. 195 1 (Cth) empowers an officer to detain a person he or she 'knows or reasonably suspects' is an 'unlawful non-citizen'. The Australia's First
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012–13
    DPACAnnual Report 2012–13 Department of Premier and Cabinet © Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania For copies or further information regarding this Report please contact: Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 Hobart TAS 7000 Telephone: 6272 7142 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpac.tas.gov.au ISSN 1448 9023 (print) ISSN 1448 9031 (online) Department of Premier and Cabinet - Annual Report 2012-13 Lara Giddings, MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to Parliament the 2012-13 Annual Report for the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Rhys Edwards Secretary 17 October 2013 Department of Premier and Cabinet - Annual Report 2012-13 Contents Secretary’s report .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Departmental overview ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Financial and human resource summary ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Governance .......................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Magistrates Annual Report 2004/2005 Draft
    MAGISTRATES COURT Tasmania ANNUAL REPORT For the year ended 30 June 2005 Criminal Division Civil Division Tribunals Coronial Phone/Fax: 03 6336 2615 MAGISTRATES CHAMBERS DX: 70121, Launceston PO Box 551 Launceston Website: Tasmania 7250 www.courts.tas.gov.au/magistrate 30 November 2005 The Honourable Judy Jackson MHA Attorney-General Level 10 10 Murray Street HOBART 7000 Dear Attorney, MAGISTRATES COURT ANNUAL REPORTS 2004-2005 I take pleasure in enclosing a volume that contains my Annual Reports with regard to the Magistrates Court as required by the: • Magistrates Court Act 1987, section 17C; and • Coroners Act 1995 section 69 Yours sincerely AG Shott CHIEF MAGISTRATE Contents COURT STATEMENTS .....................................................................................................................1 VISION ....................................................................................................................... 1 VALUES ...................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE .............................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 SAFE AT HOME.............................................................................................................. 1 CRIMES ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing OPCAT in Australia 2020
    Implementing OPCAT in Australia 2020 © Australian Human Rights Commission 2020. We encourage the dissemination and exchange of information presented in this publication and endorse the use of the Australian Governments Open Access and Licensing Framework (AusGOAL). Implementing OPCAT in Australia All material presented in this publication is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 2020 International Licence, with the exception of: • photographs and images • the Commission’s logo, any branding or trademarks • where otherwise indicated. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Australian Human Rights Commission In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the publication, as long as you attribute the Australian Human Rights Commission and abide by the other licence terms. Please give attribution to: © Australian Human Rights Commission. ISBN: 978-1-925917-23-9 Implementing OPCAT in Australia • 2020 For further information about copyright in this publication, please contact: Communications Unit Australian Human Rights Commission GPO Box 5218 SYDNEY NSW 2001 Telephone: (02) 9284 9600 TTY: 1800 620 241 Email: [email protected] Design and layout: Jody Stocovaz Cover image: iStock Internal photography: iStock The Australian Human Rights Commission is Australia’s National Human Rights Institution. It is an independent statutory organisation with responsibility for leading the promotion and protection of human rights in Australia. Further information about the Commission can be found at www.humanrights.gov.au/ about-commission. Authors: Sophie Farthing, John Howell and Edward Santow. Acknowledgements: • President Rosalind Croucher, National Children’s Rights Commissioner Megan Mitchell, Disability Discrimination Commissioner Ben Gauntlett.
    [Show full text]
  • Output Groups Corporate Services
    Output Group 1 Support for executive decision-making The objective of Output Group 1 is to provide services to assist the Premier and Cabinet to make informed decisions and progress high-priority whole-of-government initiatives. This Output Group is delivered through the Policy Division, the Tasmanian Climate Change Office and the Social Inclusion Unit. This group’s Outputs are: - 1.1 Strategic policy and advice - 1.2 Climate change - 1.3 Social inclusion Department of Premier and Cabinet - Annual Report 2013-14 15 Output 1.1 Strategic policy and advice Overview This Output assists the Government to achieve its vision for Tasmania by providing high-quality policy services to the Premier and Cabinet. DPAC’s Policy Division leads and supports the development and implementation of whole-of-government processes and policies. It also manages and co-ordinates intergovernmental relations, including Tasmania's response to: the agendas of the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) and the Council for the Australian Federation; Australian Government Parliamentary Committee inquiries; and international treaties. Key activities The key activities that are delivered under Output 1.1 include: providing high-quality policy services and support to the Premier and Cabinet; leading and supporting the development and implementation of whole-of-government processes and policies; managing and coordinating intergovernmental relations; managing and resolving urgent and immediate priority issues for the Premier; working collaboratively with agencies to
    [Show full text]
  • 2Col 12 Dec 2016 Clarion.Pages
    2. Federal (and state, for that matter) agencies and CLArion No 1612 – 01 December 2016 departments must realise that genuine consultation with people is to their advantage: they ignore or avoid it at their Email newsletter of Civil Liberties Australia (A04043) Email: peril. Secretary(at)cla.asn.au Web: http://www.cla.asn.au/ Just a small reminder: the 2013 election was Census was ‘appallingly’ handled, says also appallingly handled parliamentary committee Remember the December 2013 election? The Australian The supposed “consultation” undertaken by the ABS in the Electoral Commission lost some 1400 ballot papers in WA. lead-up to the 2016 census was appalling. The High Court formally voided the result. The entire Senate The Australian Bureau of Statistics must get rid of its threats election for WA had to be re-run in April 2014. to fine people $180 a day if they don’t complete the census, There’s a clear pattern with the ABS and the AEC: long- consult more and smarten up its management practices. standing institutions are failing due to government under- That’s the view of Senator Chris funding, while Defence and police/security departments are Ketter (ALP, Qld, photo) who is the over-funded in the extreme by comparison. chair of the Senate economics The federal government has lost balance. references committee in its report tabled last month. Trump’s first decison – ‘No TPP’ – is He criticised the ABS for failing to win for Australia consult with the general public Proto-President of the USA, Donald Trump, has delivered for before deciding to keep everyone’s Australia in his first formal decision, to throw out the Trans- names and addresses, instead of Paciic Partnership agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • DPAC Tasmania
    DPAC Annual Report 2013–14 Department of Premier and Cabinet © Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania For copies or further information regarding this Report please contact: Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 Hobart TAS 7000 Telephone: 6232 7142 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpac.tas.gov.au ISSN 1448 9023 (print) ISSN 1448 9031 (online) Department of Premier and Cabinet - Annual Report 2013-14 1 2 Department of Premier and Cabinet - Annual Report 2013-14 Will Hodgman MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to Parliament the 2013-14 Annual Report for the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Greg Johannes Secretary 9 October 2014 Department of Premier and Cabinet - Annual Report 2013-14 3 Contents Secretary’s report .................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Departmental overview ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Financial and human resource summary ................................................................................................................................... 9 Governance ............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 04 April 2017 Clarion.Pages
    CLArion No 1704 – 01 April 2017 Email newsletter of Civil Liberties Australia (A04043) Email: Secretary(at)cla.asn.au Web: http://www.cla.asn.au/ ____________________________________________ Odd alliance stands up for human rights over extradition…at last Good to see now-independent Senator Cory Bernardi and a small number of Liberals in their party room worried about human rights in extradition agreements, particularly in relation to China. That first unlikely alliance joined the Labor Party and others seriously concerned about potential human rights abuses – at last. Civil Liberties Australia has been warning the parliament’s Treaties Committee about serious problems with extradition since early 2008: http://www.cla.asn.au/News/extradition-needs-detailed-consideration/ At that time, we were also warning about the dangers of Australia exporting people to be judged, convicted and sentenced under sharia law. The CLA warning came long before anyone else was warning of the potential problems for people in Australia being given up by our government to punishments that could include the death penalty, amputations or other horrendous outcomes. The problems first became obvious with the Indonesian arrest – prompted by inappropriate Australian Federal Police exchange of information with Denpasar police – of the Bali Nine in April 2005. Two of the nine were executed by Indonesia in April 2015. We also warned that Australia was abandoning its responsibilities by handing people over to other governments…but not following up to see what happened to them, and not checking whether other governments kept their pre-handover promises. To their credit, the Treaties Committee appreciated the dangers, and suggested that the Foreign Affairs and Attorney-General’s departments change their practices, and that the Australian Federal Police guidelines be changed.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Monitoring Project a Baseline Description of How the Australian Media Report and Portray Suicide and Mental Health and Illness
    PA 6568 Media Cover 19/12/01 9:35 AM Page 2 The Media Monitoring Project a baseline description of how the australian media report and portray suicide and mental health and illness Jane Pirkis, R Warwick Blood, Catherine Francis, Peter Putnis, Philip Burgess, Belinda Morley, Andrew Stewart and Trish Payne of the Centre for Health Program Evaluation, University of Melbourne, and the School of Professional Communication, University of Canberra The MediaMonitoring Project A BASELINE DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE AUSTRALIAN MEDIA REPORT AND PORTRAY SUICIDE AND MENTAL HEALTH AND ILLNESS JANE PIRKIS, R WARWICK BLOOD, CATHERINE FRANCIS, PETER PUTNIS, PHILIP BURGESS, BELINDA MORLEY, ANDREW STEWART AND TRISH PAYNE of the Centre for Health Program Evaluation, University of Melbourne, and the School of Professional Communication, University of Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia ISBN: 0 642 50367 2 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Mental Health and Special Programs Branch. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be directed to the Promotion and Prevention Section, Mental Health and Special Programs Branch, Department of Health and Aged Care, GPO Box 9848, Canberra ACT 2601. The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Commonwealth. This document is designed to provide information to assist policy and program development in government and non-government
    [Show full text]