Screening of Field Bean Genotypes Against Major Pod Borers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Screening of Field Bean Genotypes Against Major Pod Borers Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 3886-3893 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 6 (2020) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Review Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.906.458 Screening of Field Bean Genotypes against Major Pod Borers K.M. Rashmi1, K.N. Muniswamy Gowda2, N. Umashankar Kumar2, B. Tambat2 and L. Vijayakumar1 1College of Agriculture, VC form Mandya, India 2College of Agriculture, Karekere, Hassan-573 225, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT K e yw or ds Among the thirty field bean genotypes screened against pod borers, no Screening, Field single entry was found to be highly resistant and five genotypes were bean, Genotypes, pod borers, Mandya identified as resistant (GL-661, GL-12, GL-418, GL-438 and GL-382). Article Info Whereas, thirteen genotypes were categorized as moderately resistant. Susceptible group of field bean cultivars comprised of seven genotypes and Accepted: 30 May 2020 highly susceptible group contained 5 genotypes (HA-3, Local, GL-10, GL- Available Online: 68 and HA -4). 10 Ju ne 2020 Introduction 55 species of insects and one species of mite feeding on the crop from seedling stage till Lablab purpureus (L.) commonly called as the harvest in Karnataka. field bean is one of the ancient leguminous crops cultivated mainly in southern parts of Among sucking pests lablab bug, Coptosoma India. Though the crop is cultivated in almost cribraria (Fabricius), Riptortus pedestris all regions of Karnataka, it is highly grown as (Fabricius) and Nezara viridula (Linnaeus) a mixed crop with finger millet and sorghum occurred commonly in large numbers and to a smaller extent as a pure crop under throughout the cropping period (Govindan, rainfed as well as irrigated conditions. The 1974). The significant crop damage was damage by insect pests is considered as one of attributed to the pod borer complex including the major drawbacks in achieving the Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Adisura potential yield in field bean. Many number of atkinsoni (Moore), Maruca testulalis (Geyer), pests severely ravage the buds, flowers and Etiella zinckenella (Treitschke), Cydia developing seeds of bean crop resulting in ptychora (Meyrick), Exelastis atomosa crop loss. Govindan (1974) reported around (Walshinghan), Sphenarches caffer (Zeller) 3886 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 3886-3893 and Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus) and During the period of study, incidence of Callosobruchus theobromae (L.) which are of prevalent pod borers were recorded on 5 considerable importance causing 80 per cent randomly tagged plants of each genotype in pod damage (Katagihallimath and Siddappaji, each row from flowering till harvest at 10 1962). The inflorescence is attacked by days interval and cumulative data were several species of borers, of which E. expressed as incidence of insect pests on atomosa, A. atkinsoni and H. armigera have inflorescence and pods. Based on the been considered as major pests. Currently, infestation levels genotypes were selected for spotted borer, M. vitrata is attaining a major further determination of biochemical and pest status on Lablab varieties, blooming parameters of pods. throughout the year. The seed yield loss caused by A. atkinsoni has reported to be At the time of harvest, data on total number of more than 95 per cent (Chakravarthy, 1983) pods and number of damaged pods in five and pod damage, more than 49.43 per cent plants in each genotype was recorded and per (Mallikarjunappa, 1989). cent pod damage was computed by using following formula. By considering the seriousness of damage Percentage pod damage = caused by the pod borers it is felt necessary to find efficient and precise control measures. Total number of damaged pods Since, L. purpureus is a vegetable crop, the ----------------------------------------X 100 eco-friendly suppression methods like the use Total number of pods of resistant varieties and application of need- based pesticides based on information of Further, based on the per cent pod damage insect-pest dynamics should be adopted. inflicted by pod borers, the genotypes were grouped into different categories of resistance Host plant resistance remains the most and susceptibility. The mean and standard effective tool in integrated pest management deviation (SD) of per cent pod damage was which is compatible with other methods of worked out. The classification of genotypes control without any additional cost to growers was done based on mean ± SD as mentioned (Nadeem et al., 2010). Hence the present below (Rudranaik et al., 2009 and research was undertaken to screen field bean Mallikarjuna, 2009). genotypes against major pod borers. Highly resistant: Genotypes with per cent pod Materials and Methods damage less than mean-2(SD). To evaluate the reaction of field bean Resistant: Genotypes with per cent pod genotypes to pod borer complex, 30 damage between mean-2(SD) and meanSD germplasm including popular variety (HA-4 and HA-3) and local cultivar of field bean Moderately resistant: Genotypes with per cent were sown in Rabi season in October 2017. pod damage between mean-SD and mean. Each genotype was sown in two rows of 2 m length with a row to row spacing of 60 cm Susceptible: Genotypes with per cent pod and plant to plant spacing of 20 cm. All the damage between mean and mean+SD. recommended package of practices was followed to raise the crop except for the plant Highly Susceptible: Genotypes with per cent protection measures. pod damage between mean+SD and mean+2(SD) and above. 3887 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 3886-3893 Results and Discussion Also, Umbarkar et al., (2011) reported that among the ten genotypes of green gram The larval population of major pod borers screened for their reaction to gram pod borer, viz., E. atomosa and H. armigera were H. armigera, GM-2K-5, GM- 9926 and GM- recorded only during Rabi since the 2K-3 harboring less number of larvae per population of A. atkinsoni and M. vitrata were plant were found less susceptible than sparsely distributed. The data on mean genotypes, GM-02-13 and GM-04-04 number of larvae of E. atomosa and H. harboring highest number of larvae per plant. armigera per plant (Table 1 and 2, respectively) indicated that none of the Per cent pod damage inflicted by pod borer genotypes / cultivars was found free from complex in different genotypes of field incidence of the pests. bean during Rabi 2017-18 However, the genotype GL-661 that recorded The harvested pods of different genotypes the lowest larval population of E. atomosa were assessed for the damage caused by pod (0.60 larvae/ plant) was considered to be the borers. Data on per cent pod damage was least susceptible. In addition GL-12 (0.79 estimated in all thirty genotypes of field bean larvae/ plant) and GL-418 (0.81 larvae/ plant) and presented in Table 3. were found at par showing less susceptible reactions. The genotypes HA-4, Local, HA-3, The pod damage caused by pod borers among GL-10, GL-68 and GL-66 with highest larval the cultivars was significant and ranged from population of 2.11, 2.04, 1.98, 1.86, 1.86 and 11.67 per cent to 51.4 per cent. The results 1.86 per plant, respectively were considered showed that GL-661 recorded the least as highly susceptible (Table 1). damage (11.67 %) and was found to be superior over other genotypes. It was Similarly, the genotype GL-661 that recorded followed by GL-12 (14.38 %) and this was on the lowest larval population of H. armigera par with the GL-418 (16.17 %), GL-438 (0.05 larvae/ plant) was considered to be the (17.11 %) and GL-382 (17.99 %). least susceptible. In addition GL12 (0.08 larvae/ plant), GL-418 (0.08 larvae/ plant) and Among other cultivars which recorded less GL-658 (0.09 larvae/ plant) were found at par per cent pod damage was GL-331 (20.67 %) showing less susceptible reactions. The and it was found to be on par with GL-658, genotypes HA-4, GL-68, HA-3, GL10, Local GL-464 and GL-391 these cultivars recorded and GL-66 with highest larval population of pod damage of 22.22, 22.88 and 22.94 per 0.37, 0.32, 0.29, 0.27, 0.26 and 0.25 per plant, cent, respectively. respectively were considered as highly susceptible (Table 2). The higher per cent pod damage was observed in HA-4 (51.4 %) which was on par with GL- The present findings are similar to Halder and 68 (51.02 %). The higher per cent pod Srinivasan (2010) who reported that the damage was also observed in GL10, Local genotypes light brown local, HA-3 and HA-1 and HA-3 with 48.21, 47.91 and 46.83 per harboured highest number of spotted pod cent, respectively. The remaining cultivars borer larvae which were highly susceptible. recorded per cent pod damage ranged from Whereas, the resistant genotypes H-3 UAS 24.84 per cent in GL-336 and 35.53 per cent and GP-5 harbored less number of larvae. in GL-376. 3888 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 3886-3893 Table.1 Incidence of plume moth, E. atomosa in different genotypes of field bean Sl. Genotypes Average no. of larvae per plant No. 50 DAS 60 DAS 70 DAS 80 DAS 90 DAS 100 DAS Mean 1 Ha-4 0.30 (0.89) 0.50 (1.00) 0.80 (1.14) 0.40 (0.95) 0.10 (0.77) 0.10 (0.77) 0.37 (0.93) 2 Ha-3 0.30 (0.89) 0.40 (0.95) 0.55 (1.02) 0.40 (0.95) 0.10 (0.77) 0.00 (0.71) 0.29 (0.89) 3 KNR 0.10 (0.77) 0.20 (0.84) 0.30 (0.89) 0.30 (0.89) 0.20 (0.84) 0.00 (0.71) 0.18 (0.82) 4 GL-10 0.10 (0.77) 0.20 (0.84) 0.30 (0.89) 0.50 (1.00) 0.50 (1.00) 0.00 (0.71) 0.27 (0.88) 5 GL-12 0.00 (0.71) 0.00 (0.71) 0.20 (0.84) 0.20 (0.84) 0.10 (0.77) 0.00 (0.71)
Recommended publications
  • Climate-Smart Agriculture Training Manual for Agricultural Extension Agents in Kenya
    In partnership with Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries Climate-Smart Agriculture Training Manual for Agricultural Extension Agents in Kenya Climate-Smart Agriculture | Training Manual for Agricultural Extension Agents in Kenya 1 Climate-Smart Agriculture | Training Manual for Agricultural Extension Agents in Kenya 2 CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE TRAINING MANUAL FOR AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AGENTS IN KENYA Author: BarrackO . Okoba MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE LIVESTOCK AND FISHERIES FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS KENYA, 2018 Climate-Smart Agriculture | Training Manual for Agricultural Extension Agents in Kenya 3i Required Citation: FAO, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, 2018. Climate Smart Agriculture - Train- ing Manual for Extension Agents in Kenya. ISBN 978-92-5-130780-9 © FAO, 2018 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The designations employed and the presentation of material does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area concerning the delimitation of frontiers,. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product.
    [Show full text]
  • Guzman-Et-Al-2018-Various-Papers
    El material consignado en este documento puede ser reproducido por cualquier medio, siempre y cuando no se altere su contenido. El CONIAF agradece a los usuarios incluir el crédito correspondiente en los documentos y actividades en los que se haga referencia a esta publicación. Cita Sugerida: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales (CONIAF). 2018. Socialización de Resultados de Investigación en Manejo Integrado de Plagas. Cepeda Ureña., J. (Ed.). Santo Domingo. DO. 104 p. AGRIS: H01; H10 Descriptores: Batata (Ipomoea); Control de insectos; Enfermedades de las plantas; Gandul (Cajanus); Geminivirus; Genotipos; Manejo Integrado de Plagas. Pimienta (Piper); Vainitas (Vigna); Tomate (Solanum); Rendimiento; Resistencia a agentes dañinos; Virus de las plantas; Yuca (Manihot). Edición/Revisión: Ing. Agrón. José Cepeda Ureña, M. Sc./CONIAF Diseño y Diagramación: Quality Technology Corporation Impresión: Quality Technology Corporation CONIAF 2018 Las investigaciones presentadas en este documento fueron financiadas con fondos del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales (CONIAF) y contrapartidas de las otras instituciones participantes. Mosca asiática, Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) (Diptera: Agromyzidae), sus enemigos naturales y otras plagas asociadas al cultivo del guandul en R.D. Autores: Ing. Agrón. Ramón Guzmán (Q.E.P.D.) Ing. Agrón. Laura Denis López Ing. Rosina Taveras M. Sc. 53 RESUMEN EJECUTIVO La Mosca Asiática, Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) provoca grandes daños a la producción de guandul Cajanus cajan (L.) en fructificación, reduciendo la producción y en consecuencia su exportación. El presente estudio se realizó con los objetivos de evaluar la incidencia y conocer la dinámica poblacional de esta mosca, sus parasitoides y la presencia de otras plagas del guandul, así como evaluar los daños económicos causados por éstas.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulse Crops of the World and Their Important Insect Pests.
    u* ,'Eti:ati brary TJTU OF THESIS/TITRE DE LA TH& "Pulse Crops of the World and their Important Insect pestsw UN~VERS~~/~N~VERSIT~ Simon Fraser University 1 DEGREE FOR WHICH THESIS WAS SENTEW. cnmEpour Mom mm $5 wTPR~SENT~E . *aster of pest ~mag-nt NAME OF WlSOR/NOW DU DIRECTEUR DE THiSE J-M* Permission is hereby grated to the NATI~ALLIBRARY OF Llutwisdtion m,b.r I# prdssnte, wcordde b I~@BUOTH&- CANADA to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell mpin QUE NATIONALF DU C.)NADA ds mi0r dketMss et C of the film. * de prbter w do v'sndio dss sxemplsirrs du film The author lsrsus aha publication rights, ad neither the . f'a& re r4s.m /eg 4utms d. p(rblic8tion: nl h wise mpr&ced without the wthor's mitten permissiar. IMPORTANT INSECT PESTS Carl Edmond Japlin R B.A., Antioch College, 1973 - A PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PEST MANAGEHENT in the Department , of' . - 4 F+ , @ Carl Edmond Joplin Simon F~aaerUniversity -8 -d. - - - - - -- - -- .-- -, 197'4 = _ s -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- - -- % All ,rights reserved. This the848 'may not be reproduced in-whole or in part by photocopy or other'means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL . Name: -Carl Edmond Joplin L Degree: Master of Pest Management Title of Project: Pulse Crops of the World and their Important Insect Pests Examining Committee: , r*. Chairman: John S. Barlow L -- Johii M. Webster Senior Supervisor Thelma 'Finlayson dames E. She * Hubert R. Kwarthy Head, Entomology Section Vancouver gesearch sf at ion Agriculture Canada Date Approved : ! /?74 c .
    [Show full text]
  • 6 GAURAV.Pdf
    Biological Forum — An International Journal, 3(1): 21-26(2011) ISSN : 0975-1130 Studies on Lepidopterous Insects Associated with Vegetables in Aravali Range, Rajasthan, India Gaurav Sharma Zoological Survey of India, Desert Regional Centre, Jhalamand, Jodhpur, (RJ) (Received 23 March, 2011 Accepted 14 April, 2011) ABSTRACT : The extensive studies on Lepidopterous insects associated with vegetables were conducted in different localities of Aravalli Range of Rajasthan i.e. Mount Abu, Udaipur, Rajsamand, Puskar, Ajmer, Jaipur, Sikar, Jhunjhunu, Sariska, Alwar, Dausa and Bharatpur during 2008-11. During present study 38 species of lepidopterous insects associated with vegetables in Aravalli Range of Rajasthan were recorded, out of 152 species of lepidopterous insects recorded from India. The families Crambidae and Noctuidae were the dominant families each represented by 8 species followed by Arctiidae having 4 species; Lycaenidae 3 species; then Nolidae, Pieridae and Sphingidae each having 2 species and least by Cosmopterigidae, Gelechiidae, Geometridae, Hesperiidae, Lymantriidae, Nymphalidae, Plutellidae, Pterophoridae and Saturniidae each having 1 species. On the basis of nature of damage the lepidopterous insects were also categorized as leaf feeders, pod borers, fruit borers, defoliators and leaf rollers, bud borers and leaf webbers, cut worms, leaf miners and stem borers etc. The salient details of their hosts, pest status or otherwise and their updated classification are provided. Keywords : Lepidopterous insects, Vegetables, pest status, Aravalli Range, Rajasthan. INTRODUCTION consequences like destruction of natural enemies fauna, effect on non target organisms, residues in consumable India is the second largest producer of vegetables after products including packed pure and mineral water and China, about 75 million tons.
    [Show full text]
  • D--Accb-IJPP1-IJPP 5 (2)
    Click www.researchjournal.co.in/online/subdetail.html to purchase. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION | VOLUME 5 | ISSUE 2 | OCTOBER, 2012 | 312-314 IJPP RESEARCH ARTICLE Survival of Colletotrichum truncatum in seeds and crop debris of greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] SUNIL KULKARNI1* AND V. I. BENAGI2 1*Department of Plant Pathology, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, [U.A.S.(R.)], BIDAR (KARNATAKA) INDIA 2Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, DHARWAD (KARNATAKA) INDIA ARITCLE INFO ABSTRACT Received : 04.05.2012 The per cent viability of conidia of Colletotrichum truncatum in crop debris was significantly Revised : 31.05.2015 affected by duration of storage as well as different storage conditions. The conidia survived for Accepted : 27.08.2012 a maximum of 360 days under freeze (4 - 50C) conditions and least survivability of 90 days Key Words : under field condition (28 - 300C). In case of infected seeds, the pathogen survived up to the next Greengram, crop season (12 months) but the survivability decreased with lapse of time. However, the Survival, Anthracnose, germination percentage of the seeds increased with storage time. Colletotrichum truncatum, Crop debris How to view point the article : Kulkarni, Sunil and Benagi, V.I. (2012). Survival of Colletotrichum truncatum in seeds and crop debris of greengram [Vigna radiata(L.) Wilczek]. Internat. J. Plant *Corresponding author: Protec., 5(2) : 312-314. [email protected] INTRODUCTION post crop season to observe the role of infected seeds and crop debris in the perpetuation of the pathogen from season Greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] is one of the to season. important pulse crops of India and is cultivated in 32.99 lakh ha with production of 13.74 lakh tonnes with a productivity of 417 kg per ha, while in Karnataka, the area under greengram MATERIALS AND METHODS was 1.77 lakh ha and production of 0.71 lakh tonnes and The present investigation on viability and survival of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lablab Purpureus (L.) Sweet] B.S
    Research Paper : Pests and predators activity on new variety of dolichos bean [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] B.S. RAJENDRA PRASAD, M. BYRE GOWDA , C.S. JAGADEESH BABU, G. N. VEERA KUMAR AND C.K. PRAMILA International Journal of Plant Protection, Vol. 4 No. 2 (October, 2011) : 385-389 See end of the article for authors’ affiliations SUMMARY Correspondence to : A study was carried out to investigate the incidence of different insect pests and predators on new B.S. RAJENDRA variety, HA -4 of dolichos bean. The results of the field study revealed that 15 insect pests belonging to PRASAD nine different families of five orders and five species of predators belonging to five different families AICRP (Pigeonpea) coming under four orders. The sucking pest population was found throughout the year. The peak University of Agricultural Sciences, population of aphids (49.00/3 leaves), pentatomid (5.20/5 plants) and coreid bugs (11.20/5 plants) were G.K.V.K., observed on 60 days after sowing (DAS). Whereas, eurybrachid bugs (5.20/5 plants) recorded at 50 BENGALURU DAS. Among the pod borer complex, higher pod damage due to Helicoverpa armigera , Maruca vitrata (KARNATAKA) and Lampides boeticus was 20.43, 16.66 and 10.20 per cent pod damage, respectively on 80 DAS, INDIA whereas, Callosobruchus theobromae (12.55 %) was observed on 90 DAS. The important predator’s Email : rajendrayadav viz., robber fly, coccinellids, syrphids, green lacewing and dragonfly were prominent ones. The activity [email protected] of predators was high between 40 and 60 DAS and population decline was observed thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidopterous Pests, Biology and Its Effect on Vegetable Crops
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2019; 7(4): 593-597 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Lepidopterous pests, biology and its effect on JEZS 2019; 7(4): 593-597 © 2019 JEZS vegetable crops Received: 16-05-2019 Accepted: 18-06-2019 Sanjay C Maish Sanjay C Maish Associate Professor, Head, Department of Zoology, Ewing Abstract Christian P.G College, Vegetable production is a preferred agricultural practice in India and many south east Asian countries. It Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India is a highly profitable venture but comes with a major drawback of pest infestation. The Insect pests cause major damage to the crop production and are the major limiting factor. Even among the main insects pests, Lepidopteran cause significant damage to the crops. Lepidoptera order of insects includes butterfly and moths. Pests such as diamond-back moth (DBM) on cabbage (Plutella xylostella), fruit borer on tomato (Helicoverpa armigera), pod borer on chilli (Spodoptera litura), shoot and fruit borers on brinjal (Leucinodes orbonalis) and okra (Earias fabia) are among the major lepidopteran pests of vegetables. With the advent of intensive high yielding varities/hybrids, changing cropping patterns, and the shift in pest status along with drastic decline in the climate, habitat and ecosysytem; the vegetable cultivation is facing major challenges. There has been gradual expansion in the horizon of the pests. Chilli gall midge (Asphondylia capparis) in parts of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, solenopsis mealy bug (Phenacoccus solenopsis) in brinjal, tomato, okra and cucurbits; Hadda beetle (Henosepilachna vigitioctopunctata and Epilachna dodecastigma) on cowpea and bitter gourd; plume moth (Sphenaeches caffer) in bottle gourd are some of the examples.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image
    1. PaDIL Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Sphenarches anisodactylus (Walker, 1864) (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) Common Name Geranium Plume Moth Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/maf-border/Pest/Main/142980 Image Library New Zealand Biosecurity Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/maf-border/ Partners for New Zealand Biosecurity image library Landcare Research — Manaaki Whenua http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/ MPI (Ministry for Primary Industries) http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/ 2. Species Information 2.1. Details Specimen Contact: New Zealand Arthropod Collection - [email protected] Author: McCormack, G. & Crosby, T.K Citation: McCormack, G. & Crosby, T.K (2013) Geranium Plume Moth(Sphenarches anisodactylus)Updated on 5/2/2014 Available online: PaDIL - http://www.padil.gov.au Image Use: Free for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY- NC 4.0) 2.2. URL Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/maf-border/Pest/Main/142980 2.3. Facets Commodity Overview: Field Crops and Pastures Commodity Type: Cucurbitaceous produce Distribution: Oceania, Afrotropic, Indo-Malaya, Nearctic Groups: Moths Host Family: Cucurbitaceae Pest Status: 0 Unknown Status: 0 NZ - Unknown 2.4. Other Names Megalorhipida rishwani Makhan, 1994 Oxyptilus anisodactylus Walker, 1864 Pselnophorus dolichos Matsumura, 1931 Pterophorus diffusalis Walker, 1864 Sphenarches caffer auctt Sphenarches croesus Strand, 1913 Sphenarches synophrys Meyrick, 1886 2.5. Diagnostic Notes Stout (1982:239) recorded that the larvae of an indeterminate member of _Sphenarches_ possibly ate the flowers of pumpkin in Tonga. Only one species of the genus was recorded for Tonga by Yano (1963): _Sphenarches anisodactylus_ (Walker). **Description from Walker (1864)** Dull pale ochraceous.
    [Show full text]
  • Leguminous Vegetables
    AESA BASED IPM PACKAGE LEGUMINOUS VEGETABLES , , Tel : 040-2330 3424 Tel Balaji Scan Pvt. Ltd., Important Natural Enemies of Leguminous Vegetables Insect Pests Parasitoids Plants Suitable for Ecological Engineering in Leguminous Vegetables Field Trichogramma spp. Tetrastichus spp. Telenomus spp. Alfalfa Sunflower Ocimum spp. Bracon spp. Campoletis sp Cotesia ruficrus Chrysanthemum spp. Spearmint Mustard Predators Marigold C arrot C astor Robber fly Red ant Ladybird beetle Cowpea Buckwheat Maize Spider Praying mantis Black drongo The AESA based IPM – Leguminous vegetables (cowpea, cluster bean, winged bean), was compiled by the NIPHM working group under the Chairmanship of Dr. Satyagopal Korlapati, IAS, DG, NIPHM, and guidance of Shri. Utpal Kumar Singh, IAS, JS (PP). The package was developed taking into account the advice of experts listed below on various occasions before finalization. NIPHM Working Group: Chairman : Dr. Satyagopal Korlapati, IAS, Director General Vice-Chairmen : Dr. S. N. Sushil, Plant Protection Advisor : Dr. P. Jeyakumar, Director (PHM) Core Members: 1. Er. G. Shankar, Joint Director (PHE), Pesticide Application Techniques Expertise. 2. Dr. O.P. Sharma, Joint Director (A & AM), Agronomy Expertise. 3. Dr. Dhana Raj Boina, Assistant Director (PHM), Entomology Expertise. 4. Dr. Satish Kumar Sain, Assistant Director (PHM), Pathology Expertise. Other Member: 1. Dr. B. S. Sunanda, Assistant Scientific officer (PHM), Nematology Expertise. Contributions by DPPQ & S Experts: 1. Shri. Ram Asre, Additional Plant Protection Advisor (IPM) 2. Shri. R. Murali, Deputy Director (Entomology) 3. Dr. Sanjay Arya, Deputy Director (Plant Pathology) 4. Dr. Subhash Kumar, Deputy Director (Weed Science) Contributions by External Experts: 1. Dr. H.P. Patnik, Prof & Head (Entomology), College of Agriculture, Odisha Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • INSECT PEST COMPLEX of YEAR ROUND COUNTRY BEAN (Lablab Perpureus L.) DURING SUMMER SEASON
    SCIREA Journal of Agriculture http://www.scirea.org/journal/Agriculture January 11, 2017 Volume 1, Issue 2, December 2016 INSECT PEST COMPLEX OF YEAR ROUND COUNTRY BEAN (Lablab perpureus L.) DURING SUMMER SEASON Md. Mahi Imam Mollah1*, Md. Mahbubar Rahman2, Soyema Khatun3, Mukta Mala1 1Department of Entomology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali-8602, Bangladesh 2Department of Entomology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur-1706, Bangladesh 3Plant Physiology Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh *Corresponding Author: Md. Mahi Imam Mollah Department of Entomology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali, Bangladesh Cell: 01728159074 Email: [email protected] 186 Abstract The study was conducted at the experimental field of entomology department, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh during March to July 2009 in order to know the insect pest complex found in heat tolerant year round country bean (IPSA Seem 2) field during summer season. During the study period the insect pests: Aphid (Aphis spp.), Pod borer (Maruca testularis G. & Helicoverpa armigera), Bean bug (Coptosoma cribrarium F), Leaf eating caterpillar (Plusia oricalchea Fb), Hairy caterpillar (Spilarctia obliqua), Green semilooper (Plusia oricalchea Fb.), Coreid bug (Leptoglossus spp.), Hooded hopper (Leptocentrus Taurus Fb.) & Leaf beetle (Madurasia obscurella Jacoby) were found in the year round country bean field. Among the insect pests; Aphid (Aphis spp.), Bean bug (Coptosoma cribrarium F), Leaf eating caterpillar (Plusia oricalchea Fb), Green semilooper (Plusia oricalchea Fb.), Hooded hopper (Leptocentrus Taurus Fb.) & Leaf beetle (Madurasia obscurella Jacoby) were found at the vegetative stage; Aphid (Aphis spp.), Hairy caterpillar (Spilarctia obliqua), Bean bug (Coptosoma cribrarium F), Pod borer (Maruca testularis G.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture No 6 PESTS of PULSES - REDGRAM and CHICKPEA Pest of Redgram Pod Borers, Blue Butterfly, Mites As Vectors Cause Significant Yield Reduction in Redgram
    Lecture No 6 PESTS OF PULSES - REDGRAM AND CHICKPEA Pest of redgram Pod borers, blue butterfly, mites as vectors cause significant yield reduction in redgram. Major pests 1. Gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera Noctuidae Lepidotera 2. Blue butterfly Lampides boeticus Lycaenidae Lepidoptera 3. Grass blue butterfly Euchrysops cnejus Lycaenidae Lepidoptera 4. Plume moth Exelastis atomosa Pterophoridae Lepidoptera 5. Spotted pod borer Maruca testulalis Pyraustidae Lepidoptera 6. Spiny pod borer Etiella zinckenella Phycitidae Lepidoptera 7. Field bean pod borer Adisura atkinsoni Noctuidae Lepidoptera 8. Pod fly Melanagromyza obtusa Agromyzidae Diptera 9. Stem fly Ophiomyia phaseoli Agromyzidae Diptera 10. Eriophyid mite Aceria cajani Eriophyidae Acari Minor pests 10. Blister beetle Mylabris pustulata Meloidae Coleoptera 11. Pod wasp Tanaostigmodes Tanaostigmatidae Hymenoptera cajaninae 12. Flower webber Eublemma hemirrhoda Noctuidae Lepidoptera Major pests 1. Gram pod borer: Helicoverpa armigera (Noctuidae: Lepidotera) Distribution and status: World wide Host range Cotton, sorghum, lablab, pea, chillies, groundnut, tobacco, okra, maize, tomato, soybean, safflower, gram, etc. Damage symptoms It is a polyphagous species and is an important pest on pulses. Caterpillar first feeds on foliage; later bores into pods and feeds on seeds. Larva is seen feeding with the head alone thrust inside the parts and the rest of the body hanging out. Boreholes on pods, absence of seeds on pods and defoliation in early stages are the symptoms of attack. ETL: One larva per five plants in the pod initiation stage Bionomics Adult moth is greenish to brown with a ‘V’ shaped speck on forewings and dull black border on the hind wing. Eggs are laid on the host plants singly.
    [Show full text]
  • KIMANI E. N. Msc. Thesis
    ANALYSIS OF FLAVOUR AND MOLECULAR DIVERSITY OF KENYAN LABLAB BEAN ( Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet) ACCESSIONS By ESTHER NYAMBURA KIMANI A thesis submitted to the Graduate School in partial fulfilment for the requirements of the Master of Science degree in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Egerton University EGERTON UNIVERSITY DECEMBER 2010 ii COPYRIGHT All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without prior permission from the author or by Egerton University. CopyRight © 2010 Kimani Esther iii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my dear parents Joseph Kimani Wanjama (the late) and Esther Wangare Kimani Wanjama. To God, my ever present help in time of need, to You be the glory. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank the Almighty God for seeing me through the challenging times during this study and the life lessons I had to go through. I am greatly indebted to my supervisors, Prof. Francis N. Wachira, Prof Miriam Kinyua, for their encouragement, effort, supervision, insightful criticism and guidance into deep understanding and knowledge of this study and the preparation of this thesis. I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the following institutions for providing support in the course of my study: Kirk House Trust for the financial support, Egerton University and Government Chemist for the laboratory facilities. My gratitude is extended to the Centre Director KARI, Njoro for availing the laboratory facilities, financial support and enabling environment for me to conduct the research. I am grateful to my AWARD mentor- Dr Santie deVillers, for the invaluable advice and effort in scientific writing, and Prof Matasyoh (Chemistry department- Egerton University), who contributed enormously to the analysis of volatile compounds.
    [Show full text]