DOCSLIB.ORG

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019 S90 Diabetes Care Volume 42, Supplement 1, January 2019 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to American Diabetes Association Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetesd2019 Diabetes Care 2019;42(Suppl. 1):S90–S102 | https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S009 The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes” includes ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA’s clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC. PHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY FOR TYPE 1 DIABETES Recommendations 9.1 Most people with type 1 diabetes should be treated with multiple daily 9. PHARMACOLOGIC APPROACHES TO GLYCEMIC TREATMENT injections of prandial and basal insulin, or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. A 9.2 Most individuals with type 1 diabetes should use rapid-acting insulin analogs to reduce hypoglycemia risk. A 9.3 Consider educating individuals with type 1 diabetes on matching prandial insulin doses to carbohydrate intake, premeal blood glucose levels, and anticipated physical activity. E 9.4 Individuals with type 1 diabetes who have been successfully using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion should have continued access to this therapy after they turn 65 years of age. E Insulin Therapy Because the hallmark of type 1 diabetes is absent or near-absent b-cell function, in- sulin treatment is essential for individuals with type 1 diabetes. Insufficient provision Suggested citation: American Diabetes Associa- of insulin causes not only hyperglycemia but also systematic metabolic disturbances tion. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glyc- like hypertriglyceridemia and ketoacidosis, as well as tissue catabolism. Over the past emic treatment: Standards of Medical Care in three decades, evidence has accumulated supporting multiple daily injections of Diabetesd2019. Diabetes Care 2019;42(Suppl. insulin or continuous subcutaneous administration through an insulin pump as 1):S90–S102 providing the best combination of effectiveness and safety for people with type 1 © 2018 by the American Diabetes Association. diabetes. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for Generally, insulin requirements can be estimated based on weight, with typical profit, and the work is not altered. More infor- doses ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 units/kg/day. Higher amounts are required during mation is available at http://www.diabetesjournals puberty, pregnancy, and medical illness. The American Diabetes Association/JDRF .org/content/license. care.diabetesjournals.org Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment S91 Type 1 Diabetes Sourcebook notes 0.5 the literature in adolescents and adults complications, and avoidance of intra- units/kg/day as a typical starting dose in with type 1 diabetes (10,11). Intensive muscular (IM) insulin delivery. patients with type 1 diabetes who are diabetes management using CSII and Exogenous-delivered insulin should metabolically stable, with half adminis- continuous glucose monitoring should be injected into subcutaneous tissue, not tered as prandial insulin given to control be considered in selected patients. See intramuscularly. Recommended sites for blood glucose after meals and the other Section 7 “Diabetes Technology” for a full insulin injection include the abdomen, half as basal insulin to control glycemia discussion of insulin delivery devices. thigh, buttock, and upper arm (21). Be- in the periods between meal absorp- The Diabetes Control and Complica- cause insulin absorption from IM sites tion (1); this guideline provides detailed tions Trial (DCCT) demonstrated that differs according to the activity of the information on intensification of ther- intensive therapy with multiple daily muscle, inadvertent IM injection can apy to meet individualized needs. In injections or CSII reduced A1C and was lead to unpredictable insulin absorp- addition, the American Diabetes Associ- associated with improved long-term out- tion and variable effects on glucose, ation position statement “Type 1 Diabe- comes (12–14). The study was carried with IM injection being associated tes Management Through the Life Span” out with short-acting and intermediate- with frequent and unexplained hypo- provides a thorough overview of type 1 acting human insulins. Despite better glycemia in several reports (21–23). diabetes treatment (2). microvascular, macrovascular, and all- Risk for IM insulin delivery is increased in Physiologic insulin secretion varies cause mortality outcomes, intensive ther- younger and lean patients when injecting with glycemia, meal size, and tissue apy was associated with a higher rate into the limbs rather than truncal sites demands for glucose. To approach this of severe hypoglycemia (61 episodes (abdomen and buttocks) and when using variability in people using insulin treat- per 100 patient-years of therapy). Since longer needles (24). Recent evidence ment, strategies have evolved to adjust the DCCT, rapid-acting and long-acting supports the use of short needles prandial doses based on predicted needs. insulin analogs have been developed. (e.g., 4-mm pen needles) as effective and Thus, education of patients on how to These analogs are associated with less well tolerated when compared to longer adjust prandial insulin to account for hypoglycemia, less weight gain, and needles (25,26), including a study per- carbohydrate intake, premeal glucose lower A1C than human insulins in people formed in obese adults (27). Injection levels, and anticipated activity can be with type 1 diabetes (15–17). Longer- site rotation is additionally necessary to effective and should be considered. acting basal analogs (U-300 glargine or avoid lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy Newly available information suggests degludec) may convey a lower hypogly- (21). Lipohypertrophy can contribute that individuals in whom carbohydrate cemia risk compared with U-100 glargine to erratic insulin absorption, increased counting is effective can incorporate es- in patients with type 1 diabetes (18,19). glycemic variability, and unexplained timates of meal fat and protein content Rapid-acting inhaled insulin to be used hypoglycemic episodes (28). Patients into their prandial dosing for added before meals is now available and may and/or caregivers should receive educa- benefit(3–5). reduce rates of hypoglycemia in patients tion about proper injection site rotation Most studies comparing multiple daily with type 1 diabetes (20). and to recognize and avoid areas of injections with continuous subcutane- Postprandial glucose excursions may lipohypertrophy (21). As noted in ous insulin infusion (CSII) have been be better controlled by adjusting the tim- Table 4.1, examination of insulin injec- relatively small and of short duration. ing of prandial insulin dose administration. tion sites for the presence of lipohyper- However, a recent systematic review The optimal time to administer prandial trophy, as well as assessment of injection and meta-analysis concluded that pump insulin varies, based on the type of insulin device use and injection technique, are therapy has modest advantages for used (regular, rapid-acting analog, in- key components of a comprehensive di- lowering A1C (–0.30% [95% CI –0.58 to haled, etc.), measured blood glucose level, abetes medical evaluation and treatment –0.02]) and for reducing severe hypo- timing of meals, and carbohydrate con- plan. As referenced above, there are now glycemia rates in children and adults sumption. Recommendations for prandial numerous evidence-based insulin delivery (6). There is no consensus to guide insulin dose administration should there- recommendations that have been pub- choosing which form of insulin adminis- fore be individualized. lished. Proper insulin injection technique tration is best for a given patient, and may lead to more effective use of this research to guide this decision making is Insulin Injection Technique therapy and, as such, holds the potential needed (7). The arrival of continuous Ensuring that patients and/or caregivers for improved clinical outcomes. glucose monitors to clinical practice understand correct insulin injection tech- has proven beneficial in specific circum- nique is important to optimize glucose Noninsulin Treatments for Type 1 stances. Reduction of nocturnal hypogly- control and insulin use safety. Thus, it is Diabetes cemia in people with type 1 diabetes important that insulin be delivered into Injectable and oral glucose-lowering drugs using insulin pumps with glucose sensors the proper tissue in the right way. Rec- have been studied for their efficacy as is improved by automatic suspension of ommendations have been published adjuncts to insulin treatment of type 1 insulin delivery at a preset glucose level elsewhere outlining best practices for diabetes. Pramlintide is based on the (7–9). The U.S. Food and Drug Adminis- insulin injection (21). Proper insulin naturally occurring b-cell peptide amylin tration (FDA) has also approved the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus
    TREATMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS DIABETES is a condition that affects how the body makes energy from food. Food is broken down into sugar (glucose) in the body and released into the blood. When the blood sugar level rises after a meal, insulin responds to let the sugar into the cells to be used as energy. In diabetes, the body either does not make enough insulin or it stops responding to insulin as well as it should. This results in sugar staying in the blood and leads to serious health problems over time. DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES1 • A1C Test: Lab test measuring average blood sugar over past two to three months • Fasting Blood Sugar Test: Lab test measuring blood sugar after eight hours of no food or drink • Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT): Measures blood sugar before and two hours after drinking a specific sugary liquid • Random Blood Sugar Test: Measures blood sugar at a moment in time, without any kind of preparation (like fasting) FASTING BLOOD ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE RANDOM BLOOD RESULT A1C TEST SUGAR TEST TEST SUGAR TEST Diabetes ≥ 6.5% ≥126 mg/dL ≥ 200 mg/dL ≥ 200 mg/dL Prediabetes 5.7 – 6.4% 100 – 125 mg/dL 140 – 199 mg/dL N/A Normal < 5.7% ≤99 mg/dL < 140 mg/dL N/A NON-DRUG TREATMENTS2 THERAPY COST WHAT TO EXPECT Diet (Mediterranean diet) and exercise (30 minutes a day, five days a week of moderate- Weight loss $-$$ intensity exercise); 7% weight loss decreases risk of diabetes3 Psychological intervention $$-$$$ Psychotherapy may reduce diabetic distress and improve glycemic control4,5 nationalcooperativerx.com PRESCRIPTION TREATMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • 295-304 Research Article Pulsatile Drug Delivery of Chitosan Co
    Available online www.jocpr.com Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2015, 7(12):295-304 ISSN : 0975-7384 Research Article CODEN(USA) : JCPRC5 Pulsatile drug delivery of chitosan coated beads of miglitol with fast dissolving glimepiride tablet Bhise S. H.*, Surve B. S., Aloorkar N. H., Majumdar S. H. and Kulkarni A. S. Department of Pharmaceutics, Satara College of Pharmacy, Satara, Shivaji University, Maharashtra, India _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT : Pulsatile drug delivery system was developed which have three parts fast dissolving tablet of glimepiride, sustained release chitosan coated microbeads of miglitol and plug of HPMC E5 and spray dried lactose. After pre- formulation studies fast dissolving tablets were prepared by direct compression method; which shows instant drug release and % CDR of glimepiride fast dissolving tablet was found to be 70.81%. polymer plug have lag time 2.30 hr, chitosan coated miglitol beads shows sustained release upto 81.66% .this system is evaluated using different physicochemical parameters and in-vitro studies. Result suggests that the system can be applicable for diabetes treatment. Key words: Pulsatile, microbeads, sustained release, miglitol, glimepiride. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Oral controlled drug delivery systems represent the most popular form of controlled drug delivery system which release the drug with constant or variable release rates.[1] Dose of drug, reduced dosage frequency, avoidance of side effects, and improved patient compliance. However, there are certain conditions for which such a release pattern is not suitable. These conditions demand release of drug after a lag time. In other words, it is required that the drug should not be released at all during the initial phase of dosage form administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of the Α-Glucosidase Inhibitor Miglitol on the Glucose Profile in Japanese Type 2 Diabetic Patients Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections
    Endocrine Journal 2012, 59 (4), 345-352 ORIGINAL Effect of the α-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol on the glucose profile in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients receiving multiple daily insulin injections Hiroyuki Kato, Akio Ohta, Suzuko Kobayashi, Satoshi Ishii, Yukiyoshi Sada, Hidetoshi Kobayashi, Shintaro Ohmori, Akihiko Kondo, Takuyuki Katabami, Junro Fuse, Hisashi Fukuda, Yoshio Nagai and Yasushi Tanaka Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan Abstract. Strict postprandial glycemic control may have a preventive effect on atherogenesis in patients with type 2 diabetes. The α-glucosidase inhibitor (α-GI) miglitol is useful for controlling the early postprandial increase of glucose, but the combined effect of miglitol and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) on glucose excursion has not been evaluated. First, we retrospectively compared the daily glucose profile, evaluated by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) at nine times on the day before discharge from hospital, between type 2 diabetic patients receiving MDI (n=81) or MDI plus miglitol at 150 mg daily (n=24). Second, we prospectively examined the effect of adding miglitol to MDI on the daily glucose profile (SMBG) in 19 other type 2 diabetic patients. Although the daily insulin dosage and the glucose level before meals did not differ between the two groups, the 1-h postprandial glucose level after each meal, 2-h glucose level after lunch and dinner, mean and standard deviation of glucose, and amplitude of glucose excursion were significantly lower or smaller in the MDI plus miglitol group than in the MDI group.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypoglycemia in Diabetes: Common, Often Unrecognized
    REVIEW ILAN GABRIELY, MD HARRY SHAMOON, MD CME Diabetes Research Center, Albert Einstein Professor of Medicine, Diabetes Research CREDIT College of Medicine, New York Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York Hypoglycemia in diabetes: Common, often unrecognized ■ ABSTRACT YPOGLYCEMIA poses a major barrier to H diabetes treatment. On one hand, we Hypoglycemic episodes in patients with diabetes often go want to maintain tight glycemic control to unrecognized, and over time, patients may lose the ability prevent the vascular complications of diabetes, to sense hypoglycemia, increasing their risk. Intensive but we also have to ensure the safety and com- diabetes control is beneficial for patients with diabetes, fort of the patient by avoiding hypoglycemia— but it increases their risk of hypoglycemia, underscoring and by recognizing and treating it if it occurs. the complexity of diabetes management. Hypoglycemic events are probably com- mon, especially in patients with type 1 diabetes. ■ KEY POINTS And when patients with type 2 diabetes receive insulin, they may become more prone to hypo- Epinephrine release during hypoglycemia becomes glycemic episodes. Unfortunately, the more progressively defective in type 1 diabetes. This decrease in episodes of hypoglycemia a patient has, the epinephrine response is accompanied by an attenuated more the body’s response is blunted, decreasing autonomic neural response, which results in the clinical the patient’s awareness of an episode. syndrome of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (ie, Thus, we need to be vigilant in monitor- lack of the warning symptoms of prevailing ing patients for increasing episodes of hypo- glycemia, and for events that a patient may not hypoglycemia).
    [Show full text]
  • Steglujan, INN-Ertugliflozin-Sitagliptin
    25 January 2018 EMA/86941/2018 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report Steglujan International non-proprietary name: ertugliflozin / sitagliptin Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/004313/0000 Note Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2018. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 7 1.1. Submission of the dossier ...................................................................................... 7 1.2. Steps taken for the assessment of the product ......................................................... 8 2. Scientific discussion ................................................................................ 9 2.1. Problem statement ............................................................................................... 9 2.1.1. Disease or condition ........................................................................................... 9 2.1.2. Epidemiology .................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3. Clinical presentation ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Products As Lead Compounds for Sodium Glucose Cotransporter (SGLT) Inhibitors
    Reviews Natural Products as Lead Compounds for Sodium Glucose Cotransporter (SGLT) Inhibitors Author ABSTRACT Wolfgang Blaschek Glucose homeostasis is maintained by antagonistic hormones such as insulin and glucagon as well as by regulation of glu- Affiliation cose absorption, gluconeogenesis, biosynthesis and mobiliza- Formerly: Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceu- tion of glycogen, glucose consumption in all tissues and glo- tical Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, merular filtration, and reabsorption of glucose in the kidneys. Germany Glucose enters or leaves cells mainly with the help of two membrane integrated transporters belonging either to the Key words family of facilitative glucose transporters (GLUTs) or to the Malus domestica, Rosaceae, Phlorizin, flavonoids, family of sodium glucose cotransporters (SGLTs). The intesti- ‑ SGLT inhibitors, gliflozins, diabetes nal glucose absorption by endothelial cells is managed by SGLT1, the transfer from them to the blood by GLUT2. In the received February 9, 2017 kidney SGLT2 and SGLT1 are responsible for reabsorption of revised March 3, 2017 filtered glucose from the primary urine, and GLUT2 and accepted March 6, 2017 GLUT1 enable the transport of glucose from epithelial cells Bibliography back into the blood stream. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-106050 The flavonoid phlorizin was isolated from the bark of apple Published online April 10, 2017 | Planta Med 2017; 83: 985– trees and shown to cause glucosuria. Phlorizin is an inhibitor 993 © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York | of SGLT1 and SGLT2. With phlorizin as lead compound, specif- ISSN 0032‑0943 ic inhibitors of SGLT2 were developed in the last decade and some of them have been approved for treatment mainly of Correspondence type 2 diabetes.
    [Show full text]
  • Women with Higher BMI at Lower Risk for Glaucoma
    44 WOMEN'S HEALTH SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 • FAMILY PRACTICE NEWS DRUGS, PREGNANCY, AND LACTATION Use of Antidiabetic Agents During Pregnancy n a previous column, I looked at the abinese), tolazamide (Tolinase), and tolbu- thetic analogue of human amylin given was discovered. No developmental toxi- ways uncontrolled hyperglycemia tamide (Orinase). They can cause marked by subcutaneous injection, but the ani- city was observed in the newborns. Iduring pregnancy causes significant and persistent neonatal hypoglycemia if mal data suggest moderate risk (struc- Pioglitazone (Actos) and rosiglitazone toxicity for the mother, embryo, fetus, taken close to birth. To prevent this toxi- tural anomalies in rats). The drug— (Avandia), thiazolidinediones used as ad- newborn, and adolescent (“Toxicity of city, therapy should be changed to insulin which slows the rate of gastric emptying, juncts to diet and exercise, lower insulin Diabetes in Pregnancy,” December in the third trimester or, at least, several prevents a postprandial rise in plasma resistance but do not promote insulin re- 2009, p. 52). days before birth. glucagon, and promotes satiety—is best lease. Animal reproduction data suggest This column examines the The second-generation sul- avoided in pregnancy. risk, but the human experience is too use of antidiabetic agents, fonylureas glipizide (Glu- Saxagliptin (Onglyza) and sitagliptin limited to assess the risk, so they should other than insulin, that are cotrol), glimepiride (Amaryl), (Januvia), inhibitors of the enzyme be avoided in pregnancy. used for non–insulin-depen- and glyburide (DiaBeta, Gly- dipeptidyl peptidase–4, are indicated as In summary, only metformin and gly- dent diabetes during preg- nase, and Micronase) are pre- monotherapy or in combination with buride have sufficient human pregnancy nancy and lactation.
    [Show full text]
  • Steglujan (Ertugliflozin/Sitagliptin), Segluromet
    Steglatro™ (ertugliflozin), Steglujan™ (ertugliflozin/sitagliptin), Segluromet™ (ertugliflozin/metformin) – New drug approval • On December 19, 2017, the FDA approved Merck’s Steglatro (ertugliflozin), Steglujan (ertugliflozin/sitagliptin), and Segluromet (ertugliflozin/metformin) as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). — Steglujan is indicated when treatment with both ertugliflozin and sitagliptin is appropriate. — Segluromet is indicated when patients are not adequately controlled on a regimen containing ertugliflozin or metformin, or in patients who are already treated with both ertugliflozin and metformin. — These drugs are not recommended in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis. — Steglujan has not been studied in patients with a history of pancreatitis. It is unknown whether patients with a history of pancreatitis are at increased risk for the development of pancreatitis while using Steglujan. • Ertugliflozin is the fourth sodium-glucose co-transoporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor approved by the FDA. Other marketed SGLT2 inhibitors include Jardiance® (empagliflozin), Farxiga® (dapagliflozin), and Invokana® (canagliflozin). • The efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin were evaluated in multiple clinical studies involving patients with T2DM. Ertugliflozin was studied as monotherapy and in combination with metformin and/or a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. Ertugliflozin was also studied in combination with other antidiabetic medications, including insulin and a sulfonylurea, and in T2DM patients with moderate renal impairment. — In patients with T2DM, treatment with ertugliflozin, ertugliflozin + sitagliptin, and ertugliflozin + metformin reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) vs. placebo or the active comparator. — In patients with T2DM and moderate renal impairment, treatment with ertugliflozin did not result in a reduction in HbA1c vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Newer Diabetes Treatments Drug Class Update with New Drug Evaluation: Semaglutide and Ertugliflozin
    © Copyright 2012 Oregon State University. All Rights Reserved Drug Use Research & Management Program Oregon State University, 500 Summer Street NE, E35 Salem, Oregon 97301-1079 Phone 503-947-5220 | Fax 503-947-1119 Newer Diabetes Treatments Drug Class Update with New Drug Evaluation: Semaglutide and Ertugliflozin Date of Review: July 2018 Date of Last Review: September 2017 End Date of Literature Search: 05/23/2018 Generic Name: semaglutide Brand Name (Manufacturer): Ozempic® (Novo Nordisk) Generic Name: ertugliflozin, ertugliflozin/sitagliptin, ertugliflozin/metformin Brand Name (Manufacturer): Steglatro™, Steglujan™, Segluromet™ (Merck & Co., Inc.) Dossier Received: ertugliflozin (yes), semaglutide (no) Current Status of PDL Class: See Appendix 1. Purpose for Class Update: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of semaglutide and ertugliflozin (and combinations) which were recently approved for blood glucose lowering in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). High quality new evidence published since the last review will also be presented. Research Questions: 1. In patients with T2DM, is there any new comparative evidence for non-insulin antidiabetic therapies based on surrogate efficacy outcomes (e.g., hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]) and long-term clinically meaningful effectiveness outcomes (e.g., microvascular outcomes, macrovascular outcomes and mortality)? 2. In patients with T2DM, is there any new comparative evidence for non-insulin diabetes treatments based on harms outcomes (e.g., severe hypoglycemia, heart failure, diabetic ketoacidosis, pancreatitis, etc.)? 3. Are there subpopulations of patients with T2DM for which specific therapies may be more effective or associated with less harm? 4. What are the efficacy and harms evidence for the two new non-insulin diabetes treatments, ertugliflozin and semaglutide? Conclusions: A Drug Effectiveness Review Project (DERP) update on newer diabetes therapies, three new guidelines/standards, one new randomized controlled trial and two new drug reviews were reviewed for this class update.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Review of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Adults
    SECTION 18.5 Comparative Review of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Adults Harinder Chahal For WHO Secretariat Table of Contents Acronyms: ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 I. Background and Rationale for the review: ....................................................................................................................... 4 II. Medications under comparative review: ......................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1 - New oral hypoglycemic agents for comparison with current EML agents .......................................................... 5 III. Literature searches and methodology: ............................................................................................................................ 5 1. Title Search Results: .................................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Statement about quality of evidence: ........................................................................................................................ 6 IV. Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation: ............................................................................................................................ 6 1. DPP-4 Inhibitors (Sitagliptin, Saxagliptin) and Metformin: ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SEGLUROMET, INN-Ertugliflozin-Metformin
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions. 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Segluromet 2.5 mg/850 mg film-coated tablets Segluromet 2.5 mg/1,000 mg film-coated tablets Segluromet 7.5 mg/850 mg film-coated tablets Segluromet 7.5 mg/1,000 mg film-coated tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Segluromet 2.5 mg/850 mg film-coated tablets Each tablet contains 2.5 mg ertugliflozin (as ertugliflozin L-pyroglutamic acid) and 850 mg of metformin hydrochloride. Segluromet 2.5 mg/1,000 mg film-coated tablets Each tablet contains 2.5 mg ertugliflozin (as ertugliflozin L-pyroglutamic acid) and 1,000 mg of metformin hydrochloride. Segluromet 7.5 mg/850 mg film-coated tablets Each tablet contains 7.5 mg ertugliflozin (as ertugliflozin L-pyroglutamic acid) and 850 mg metformin hydrochloride. Segluromet 7.5 mg/1,000 mg film-coated tablets Each tablet contains 7.5 mg ertugliflozin (as ertugliflozin L-pyroglutamic acid) and 1,000 mg metformin hydrochloride. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Film-coated tablet (tablet). Segluromet 2.5 mg/850 mg film-coated tablets Beige, 18 x 10 mm oval, film-coated tablet debossed with “2.5/850” on one side and plain on the other side. Segluromet 2.5 mg/1,000 mg film-coated tablets Pink, 19.1 x 10.6 mm oval, film-coated tablet debossed with “2.5/1000” on one side and plain on the other side.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Health Fact Sheet for Dental Professionals Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
    Oral Health Fact Sheet for Dental Professionals Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Type 2 Diabetes ranges from predominantly insulin resistant with relative insulin deficiency to predominantly an insulin secretory defect with insulin resistance, American Diabetes Association, 2010. (ICD 9 code 250.0) Prevalence • 23.6 million Americans have diabetes – 7.8% of U.S. population. Of these, 5.7 million do not know they have the disease. • 1.6 million people ≥20 years of age are diagnosed with diabetes annually. • 90–95% of diabetic patients have Type 2 Diabetes. Manifestations Clinical of untreated diabetes • High blood glucose level • Excessive thirst • Frequent urination • Weight loss • Fatigue Oral • Increased risk of dental caries due to salivary hypofunction • Accelerated tooth eruption with increasing age • Gingivitis with high risk of periodontal disease (poor control increases risk) • Salivary gland dysfunction leading to xerostomia • Impaired or delayed wound healing • Taste dysfunction • Oral candidiasis • Higher incidence of lichen planus Other Potential Disorders/Concerns • Ketoacidosis, kidney failure, gastroparesis, diabetic neuropathy and retinopathy • Poor circulation, increased occurrence of infections, and coronary heart disease Management Medication The list of medications below are intended to serve only as a guide to facilitate the dental professional’s understanding of medications that can be used for Type 2 Diabetes. Medical protocols can vary for individuals with Type 2 Diabetes from few to multiple medications. ACTION TYPE BRAND NAME/GENERIC SIDE EFFECTS Enhance insulin Sulfonylureas Glipizide (Glucotrol) Angioedema secretion Glyburide (DiaBeta, Fluconazoles may increase the Glynase, Micronase) hypoglycemic effect of glipizide Glimepiride (Amaryl) and glyburide. Tolazamide (Tolinase, Corticosteroids may produce Diabinese, Orinase) hyperglycemia. Floxin and other fluoroquinolones may increase the hypoglycemic effect of sulfonylureas.
    [Show full text]