DOCSLIB.ORG

Design, Analysis and Experimental Verification of Tubular Spaceframe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design, Analysis and Experimental Verification of Tubular Spaceframe DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF TUBULAR SPACEFRAME CHASSIS FOR FSAE APPLICATION LIEW ZHEN HUI (B.Eng. (Hons.), NUS) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2012 Summary This project investigates various subjects of chassis with specific emphasis on FSAE application. CAE tools such as SolidWorks CAD and SolidWorks Simulation are utilized for the project. The design and analysis of the chassis is conducted with a parametric approach, which is performed in a systematic and systemic manner. Every progression of design is assessed and interpreted in detail in the thesis. Data of accelerations, which the chassis experiences during the operation of the race car, is also collected. Accelerometers are utilized for such task. Data acquired is interpreted and is related back to assumptions used in the design analysis. Stressed skin construction for the chassis is also researched and presented in the thesis, with physical tests carried out to compare the performance of stressed skin frame, “spaceframe” frame and bare frame. The knowledge gained from these tasks is documented in this thesis and to be passed to NUS FSAE race team upon completion so as to aid the development of the future race car. I Acknowledgement The author wishes to take this opportunity to express sincere gratitude to following individuals for the assistance, enabling the author to successfully accomplish the project: • Prof Seah Kar Heng • Prof Tay Tong Earn • Mr Andre Oh Yide • Mr Lim Hong Wee • Mr Goh Kim Hoo • Team NUS FSAE 2011 • Team NUS FSAE 2012 • Team NUS ECO Car 2012 II Table of Content SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................................................... II TABLE OF CONTENT ........................................................................................................................ III LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. VI LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................. X LIST OF CHARTS ............................................................................................................................... XX LIST OF GRAPHS ............................................................................................................................ XXV LIST OF EQUATIONS ................................................................................................................... XXXI LIST OF SYMBOLS ...................................................................................................................... XXXII 1. PROLOGUE ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. COMPETITION BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 1 1.2. PROJECT BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3. PROJECT OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................ 2 1.4. PROJECT SCOPE ....................................................................................................................... 2 2. CHASSIS OF FSAE RACE CAR ................................................................................................. 5 2.1. FUNCTION OF CHASSIS ............................................................................................................ 5 2.2. ATTRIBUTES OF CHASSIS ......................................................................................................... 5 2.3. TYPE OF CHASSIS .................................................................................................................. 10 2.4. LOAD CASES OF CHASSIS ...................................................................................................... 17 3. DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF CHASSIS ...................................................................................... 22 3.1. TYPE OF CHASSIS CONSTRUCTION ........................................................................................ 22 3.2. TYPE OF MATERIAL ............................................................................................................... 22 3.3. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................ 22 3.4. COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING (CAE) TOOL ..................................................................... 24 3.5. DESIGN METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 28 III 3.6. DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF CHASSIS ......................................................................................... 54 3.7. ESTIMATION OF DISCREPANCY & PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS OF ENHANCED CONCEIVED CHASSIS ...................................................................................................... 154 3.8. DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION ..................................................................................... 160 4. DATA ACQUISITION ON OPERATION LOAD OF CHASSIS ......................................... 162 4.1. OBJECTIVE OF DATA ACQUISITION ..................................................................................... 162 4.2. OUTLINE AND PREPARATION OF TEST RUN FOR DATA ACQUISITION .................................. 163 4.3. PRESENTATION & INTERPRETATION OF DATA ..................................................................... 165 4.4. DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION ..................................................................................... 178 5. RESEARCH ON STRESSED SKIN CONSTRUCTION FOR CHASSIS ............................ 180 5.1. STRESSED SKIN PRINCIPLE .................................................................................................. 180 5.2. PHYSICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TUBULAR SPACEFRAME & STRESSED SKIN CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 183 5.3. INTERPRETATION OF DATA & PRESENTATION OF RESULT ................................................... 192 5.4. DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION ..................................................................................... 207 6. CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................... 209 REFERENCE ...................................................................................................................................... 210 APPENDICES 1 - DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF CHASSIS – SHAPE OF CHASSIS ..................... 212 APPENDICES 2 - DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF CHASSIS – ORIENTATION OF BRACE ........ 230 APPENDICES 3 - DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF CHASSIS – CROSS SECTION OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENT ............................................................................................................... 250 APPENDICES 4 - DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF CHASSIS – ESTIMATION OF DISCREPANCY & PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS OF ENHANCED CONCEIVED CHASSIS ..................................................................................................................... 268 APPENDICES 5 - DATA ACQUISITION ON THE OPERATION LOAD OF CHASSIS – X1-6A ACCELEROMETER .......................................................................................................................... 273 IV APPENDICES 6- DATA ACQUISITION ON THE OPERATION LOAD OF CHASSIS – ACQUIRED DATA ............................................................................................................................. 288 APPENDICES 7 - RESEARCH ON STRESSED SKIN CONSTRUCTION FOR CHASSIS ...... 298 V List of Tables TABLE 1-COMPARISON OF DEFORMATION BETWEEN TRIANGULATED AND ORIGINAL PLANAR FRAME ...... 31 TABLE 2-DYNAMIC FACTORS USED FOR NUS FSAE RACE CAR ............................................................. 45 TABLE 3-WEIGHT, STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS (STS) AND SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS OF CHASSIS 2 WITH RESPECT TO VARIATION OF LENGTH OF FOOT WELL ......................... 59 TABLE 4-WEIGHT, STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS (STS) AND SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS OF CHASSIS 3 WITH RESPECT TO VARIATION OF HEIGHT OF FRONT BULKHEAD ............... 61 TABLE 5-WEIGHT, STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS (STS) AND SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS OF CHASSIS 4 WITH RESPECT TO VARIATION OF WIDTH OF FRONT BULKHEAD ................ 63 TABLE 6-WEIGHT, STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS (STS) AND SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS OF CHASSIS 5 WITH RESPECT TO VARIATION OF HEIGHT OF FRONT MIDDLE BULKHEAD .. 65 TABLE 7-WEIGHT, STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS (STS) AND SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS OF CHASSIS 6 WITH RESPECT TO VARIATION OF HEIGHT OF FRONT ROLL HOOP ............... 69 TABLE 8-WEIGHT, STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS (STS) AND SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS OF CHASSIS 7 WITH RESPECT TO VARIATION OF LENGTH OF DRIVER COCKPIT ................. 72 TABLE 9-WEIGHT, STRUCTURAL TORSIONAL STIFFNESS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modeling and Structural Analysis of Heavy Vehicle Chassis Made Of
    International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2594-2600 ISSN: 2249-6645 Modeling and Structural analysis of heavy vehicle chassis made of polymeric composite material by three different cross sections M. Ravi Chandra1, S. Sreenivasulu2, Syed Altaf Hussain3, *(PG student, School of Mechanical Engineering RGM College of Engg. & Technology, Nandyal-518501, India.) ** (School of Mechanical Engineering, RGM College of Engineering & Technology, Nandyal-518501, India) *** (School of Mechanical Engineering, RGM College of Engineering & Technology, Nandyal-518501, India) ABSTRACT: The chassis frame forms the backbone of a needed for supporting vehicular components and payload heavy vehicle, its principle function is to safely carry the placed upon it. Automotive chassis or automobile chassis maximum load for all designed operating conditions. helps keep an automobile rigid, stiff and unbending. Auto This paper describes design and analysis of heavy vehicle chassis ensures low levels of noise, vibrations and chassis. Weight reduction is now the main issue in harshness throughout the automobile. The different types of automobile industries. In the present work, the dimensions automobile chassis include: of an existing heavy vehicle chassis of a TATA 2515EX vehicle is taken for modeling and analysis of a heavy Ladder Chassis: Ladder chassis is considered to be one of vehicle chassis with three different composite materials the oldest forms of automotive chassis or automobile namely, Carbon/Epoxy, E-glass/Epoxy and S-glass /Epoxy chassis that is still used by most of the SUVs till today. As subjected to the same pressure as that of a steel chassis.
    [Show full text]
  • Reignite Your Va Va Voom Drive the Change
    RENAULTSPORT REIGNITE YOUR VA VA VOOM DRIVE THE CHANGE RENAULTSPORT REIGNITE YOUR VA VA VOOM OUR KNOWLEDGE p. 3 HALL OF FAME p. 4 CLIO RENAULTSPORT p. 6 CLIO GT-LINE p. 14 MEGANE RENAULTSPORT p. 20 TRACKDAYS AND EVENTS p. 30 OUR KNOWLEDGE FROM FORMULA 1 TO ROAD CARS RENAULT - 115 YEARS OF HISTORY, UNDERPINNED WITH A UNIQUE COMMITMENT AND PASSION FOR MOTOR SPORT Renault has raced for almost as long as the company has been alive. In 1902 a Renault Type K won its first victory in the Paris-to-Vienna road race, propelled by a four cylinder engine producing slightly more than 40 horsepower. It beat the more powerful Mercedes and Panhard racers because they broke down, proving very early on that to finish first, first you have to finish. In that same year Renault patented the turbocharger, something it had not forgotten in 1977 when it was the first manufacturer to race a turbocharged Formula One car. The RS01 was initially nicknamed the 'Yellow Teapot' by amused rival teams, but intensive development eventually saw it scoring fourth place in the 1978 US Grand Prix, and a pole position the following year. Within three years of the Yellow Teapot’s arrival most rival teams were also using turbochargers. Although today’s Renaultsport RS27-2013 engine is a normally aspirated V8, as required by the regulations, from 2014 it will be replaced by a highly advanced, downsized 1.6-litre turbocharged V6 featuring a pair of powerful energy recuperation systems that feed twin electric motors. These include an Energy Recovery System (ERS-K) that harvests Kinetic energy, and a second Energy Recovery System (ERS-H) that captures Heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Lotus Cars Limited DELAMARE ROAD, CHESHUNT, HERTFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND TELEPHONES: WALTHAM CROSS 26181/10 CABLES: LOTUSCARS LONDON
    THE (C Constructed around a backbone of racing experience ... Years of painstaking design, research and experience have reached their spectacular conclusion in the production of the Lotus Elan. Even to the untrained eye the sleek and crisp styling of the glassfibre-reinforced-plastic coach- work immediately creates the impression of a beautifully balanced motor car. Compact yet spacious, fast but also quiet and docile, superbly finished and equipped but low in price. The Lotus Elan represents so great an advance in sports car design as to be unique. LOUt S From its precision engineered twin overhead camshaft engine to its functional foam filled bumpers this · car portrays a totally new outlook in automotive engineering. I n Numerous features of the Lotus Elan are indirectly con- · ceived from its renowned sister - the Lotus Elite - and . backed by the design resources of today's most successful manufacturer of specialised performance cars, Lotus 150 O present a safe, proven, economical and unbelievably exciting sports car well worthy of the reputation which has made the Marque world famous. Full length, wide opening doors give step ease of entry for driver and passenger. The compact form ofthe Lotus inside Elan belies the well appointed spacious interior with fully adjustable, deep squab-shaped bucket seats for driver and passenger, plus occasional seating for a child. Alternatively, this space will accom- modate a carry-cot. Sliding side windows, precise door locks, glove compartment and map pockets are further features of the Elan's interior design. , ,,.$~:~~ The sloping bonnet provides \-.._Jrf'l~ . ~~.~":~:=:;;;:~= completely unobstructed . y vision of the road ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Analysis of a 3-Wheleer Integrated Monocoque Chassis 1 2 3 G
    ISSN 2319-8885 Vol.05,Issue.05, February-2016, Pages:0984-0989 www.ijsetr.com Design and Analysis of a 3-Wheleer Integrated Monocoque Chassis 1 2 3 G. SAWAN KUMAR , SHUVENDRA MOHAN , G. SARVOTHAM YADAV 1B.Tech Scholar, Dept of Aeronautical, SVIET, Hyderabad, TS, India, E-mail: [email protected]. 2M.Tech Scholar, Dept of Aeronautical, IARE, Hyderabad, TS, India, E-mail: [email protected]. 3M.S Scholar, Dept of Mechanical, Southern University A & M, Louisiana-USA, E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract: In this project, the design and development of integrated chassis of three wheeler prototype vehicle chassis is done, to convert the three wheeler passenger vehicle chassis into a load carrier chassis with the aim of reducing the tooling cost and increasing the rate of production. For this, the analysis is carried out by using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). The parameters checked in the analysis are the displacement of the chassis structure and stresses under static condition. The modeling of new chassis is done by using PRO-E and FEA by using ANSYS. Specifications of materials selection become a priority in order to construct the new chassis, based on the results of FEA we selected CRS-D grade (Cold Rolled Steel) of thickness 1.6mm. The best design with minimum self-weight, maximum load capacity and minimum deflection under static loading was then identified based on the results obtained through FEA. Keywords: FEA, CRS-D, Monocoque. I. INTRODUCTION Advantages: Chassis is a French term and was initially used to denote The half-axles have better contact with ground when the frame parts or basic structure of the Vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Analysis of Car Chassis Mohamad Sazuan Bin
    i DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF CAR CHASSIS MOHAMAD SAZUAN BIN SARIFUDIN A report submitted for partial fulfilment of the requirement for the Diploma of Mechanical Engineering award. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG JANUARY 2012 vi ABSTRACT This project concerns on the assessment on making an analysis of the car chassis will fit all aspects and concepts according to the rules of Eco Marathon Challenge. The objective of this project to design and analyse of car chassis. To avoid any possibilities of failure of the structure and thus to provide enough supporting member to make the region stronger in term of deformation. Finite element analysis enables to predict the region that tends to fail due to loading. Besides that, need to utilize the feature of CAE software named as FEMPRO to get the distribution of stress and strain on the chassis, both component as well as the material costing. The main objective is to study the effect of load that applied in term of driver weight, the car body and the equipment. vii ABSTRAK Projek ini menekankan pembelajaran berkenaan dengan cara–cara menganalisa terhadap casis kereta berdasarkan undang-undang yang terdapat di dalam pertandingan Shell Eco Marathon. Objektif projek ini ada untuk mebuat rekaan adan menganalisa casis kereta. Untuk menghindarkan sebarang kemungkinan kegagalan struktur casis kereta dan membrikan sokongan yang secukupnya kepada casis kereta. Analisa “Finite element” membantu untuk mengesan kawasan yang berkemungkinan akan gagal. Perisian CAE atau FEMPRO digunakan untuk mendapatkan taburan “stress” dan “strain”. Tambahan pula, tujuan utama adalah untuk menelaah kesan bebanan hasil daripada berat pemandu, berat body dan berat kelengkapan tambahan.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Warwick School of Engineering
    University of Warwick School of Engineering Chassis Design Analysis for Formula Student Car by Samuel Turner 0619743 Report Reference Code: ES327 Supervisor: Dr K. Mao i Author's Self Assessment What is the engineering contribution of this project? This project focuses on gaining primary data on the strength and stiffness of the proposed chassis for the 2009 Warwick formula student car. This data has been analysed to identify any areas that lack the necessary stiffness and also areas that could have the stiffness reduced in order to lower the total weight of the chassis. Why should this contribution be considered either relevant or important to engineering? This project can be considered relevant to engineering as it demonstrates ways in which finite element analysis techniques can be adopted and used for basic analysis of space frame style chassis’ designs in order to allow an optimal design to be achieved. The project also provides an example of how finite element analysis can be applied to many different situations and serves as an illustration of the wide umbrella of areas that it is suitable for. How can others make use of the work in this project? Other people who may find this report useful include future teams on Warwick Formula Student projects. This report can serve as a base upon which there designs can be built. The report shows areas on the chassis that are prone to high forces under certain conditions and so future teams can develop their vehicles appropriately in order to reduce the effect of these forces. ii Why should this project be considered an achievement? This project can be considered an achievement because it has shown that the proposed chassis design suitably meets the needs of the vehicle and will provide confirmation to the 2009 Warwick Formula Student team that their design is suitable for the purpose intended and will allow them to know with confidence that their design will function to the full extent that it was designed for.
    [Show full text]
  • Reignite Your Va Va Voom Drive The
    RENAULTSPORT REIGNITE YOUR VA VA VOOM (Enter Renaultsport’s World at www.renaultsport.co.uk www.facebook.com/renaultsportuk www.twitter.com/renault_uk) DRIVE THE CHANGE RENAULTSPORT REIGNITE YOUR VA VA VOOM OUR KNOWLEDGE p. 3 HALL OF FAME p. 4 TWINGO RENAULTSPORT p. 6 NEW CLIO RENAULTSPORT p. 12 NEW CLIO GT-LINE p. 20 MEGANE RENAULTSPORT 265 CUP p. 26 MEGANE RENAULTSPORT 265 p. 30 RENAULTSPORT TECHNOLOGY p. 38 TRACKDAYS AND EVENTS p. 40 OUR KNOWLEDGE FROM FORMULA 1 OUR KNOWLEDGE p. 3 TO ROAD CARS HALL OF FAME p. 4 RENAULT - 115 YEARS OF HISTORY, UNDERPINNED WITH A UNIQUE COMMITMENT AND PASSION FOR MOTOR SPORT TWINGO RENAULTSPORT p. 6 Renault has raced for almost as long as the company has been alive. In 1902 a Renault Type K won its !rst victory in the Paris-to-Vienna road race, propelled by a four cylinder engine NEW CLIO RENAULTSPORT p. 12 producing slightly more than 40 horsepower. It beat the more powerful Mercedes and Panhard racers because they broke down, proving very early on that to !nish !rst, !rst you have to !nish. In that same year Renault patented the turbocharger, something it had not forgotten in 1977 when it was the !rst manufacturer to race a turbocharged Formula One car. The RS01 NEW CLIO GT-LINE p. 20 was initially nicknamed the ‘Yellow Teapot’ by amused rival teams, but intensive development eventually saw it scoring fourth place in the 1978 US Grand Prix, and a pole position the following year. Within three years of the Yellow Teapot’s arrival most rival teams were also using MEGANE RENAULTSPORT 265 CUP p.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Stress Analysis of Heavy Commercial Vehicle Ladder
    ISSN (Online) 2456-1290 International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE) Vol 2, Issue 12,December 2017 Design and Stress Analysis of Heavy Commercial Vehicle Ladder Chassis by Finite Element Method using ANSYS [1] Sivaramapandian J, [2] Vikram H, [3] Sreesakthivel K [1][2][3] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India. Abstract: Automotive chassis frame is most crucial element that gives strength, stability and is the structural backbone of any vehicle whose role to provide skeletal frame to which the body of an engine, axle assemblies are affixed. The chassis frame must be rigid enough to withstand the stresses, shocks and deformation occurring and its main function is to carry the maximum load for all designed operating conditions with safety in mind. Considering the fact that in India commercial vehicles carry non-uniform loads, that leads to the failure possibilities in the chassis frame. An important consideration in chassis design is to have adequate bending stiffness along with strength for better handling characteristics. Therefore, maximum shear stress, stiffness and deflection are important criteria for the chassis design. After a careful analysis of various research studies conducted so for it has been found that sufficient studies have not been conducted on variable section chassis concept. This paper emphasises on design modification in the Section of a frame and comparison of structural analysis of those sections and conventional type frame for higher strength. In this research work, we authors have adopted the dimensions of an existing heavy vehicle frame for conceptual structural changes through modelling and analysis with the help of ANSYS software.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Solar Car Team #9 (Chassis)
    PRINCE MOHAMMAD BIN FAHD UNIVERSITY College of Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering Spring 2019-2020 Design of a Solar Car Team #9 (Chassis) Group Members Student Name Mohammed Alqahtani Faisal Alotaibi Ahmed Alabdullatif Hisham Alabdullatif 201501615 201600503 201600562 201600532 ID 1 | P a g e College of Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering Spring 2020 Senior Design Project Report Title: Design of Space Frame for Solar Car. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering Team Members Team Members Student Name Student ID Hisham Alabdullatif 201600532 Ahmed Alabdullatif 201600562 Mohammed Alqahtani 201501615 Faisal Alotaibi 201600503 Advisor: Dr. Raguraman Kannan 2 | P a g e Abstract This project report presents about design and analysis of solar car chassis and body. The objective of this project is to design and analysis of the elements of body and chassis of a solar car for the target of the most lightweight and lowest material cost design. The solar car chassis is designed using Solid Work. Two designs of solar car chassis are analyzed. The maximum displacement magnitude, worst stress and worst strain is compared between solar car chassis Design 1 and Design 2. The solar car body is developed using Solid Work 2018. 3 | P a g e Acknowledgements We are extremely beholden and own an irredeemable dept, of gratitude to our project advisor for their valuable guidance and help extended to us in our project. We consider it as a great opportunity to do project under his guidance and to learn from his research expertise. It was incredible to get his professional direction that positively impacted work on a major deal.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Master's Programme in Mechanical Engineering, 60 credits MASTER Project Ecoist THESIS Conceptual design of the sheet-metal chassis for a three-wheel electrical vehicle Anne-Li Lundqvist and Christian Thomas Master Thesis, 15 credits Halmstad 2017-05-25 PREFACE Thank you all for supporting us in different ways in this master thesis! Examiner PhD Aron Chibba Halmstad University Supervisor PhD Håkan Petersson Halmstad University Supervisor Thomas Koch SirGomez Engineering AB Per Asterlind ArcelorMittal BE Group SSC AB Karl Johansson ESAB Sam Madsen Hoghtech AB Dr Anoop Chawla Indian Institute of Technology Patrik Hammarbäck Transportstyreslen Tanja Vainionpaa Transportstyreslen Bo Göringberg Transportstyreslen Luigi de Barone Svenska Fordonsbyggares Riksorganisation Robert Eriksson Svenska Fordonsbyggares Riksorganisation Gustaf Ridderstolpe Svenska Fordonsbyggares Riksorganisation Gustaf Ulander Svenska Fordonsbyggares Riksorganisation Peter Wounsch Svenska Fordonsbyggares Riksorganisation Peter Karlsson Swedish Standards Institute Herman Leufstadius Swedish Standards Institute Marie-Louise Bandelin Swedish Standards Institute Maria Nordqvist Sveriges MotorCyklister Ola Holmberg Weland AB Pece Ilievski Weland AB Lars Nord Weland AB Fredrik Påhlman Weland AB Peter Sköld Weland AB Anne-Li Lundqvist [email protected] [email protected] linkedin.com/in/annelilundqvist Christian Thomas [email protected] [email protected] linkedin.com/in/christian-thomas ABSTRACT Purpose The aim of the thesis is to aid the project Ecoist in further developing a chassis which needs be manufactural with reliable dimensions to prepare for a small pilot batch of units. Dimensions are intended to fluctuate at a minimum to greatly reduce- or completely remove the need for correcting actions during assembly. Approach To create a viable and functional product proposal, a thorough investigation of legal requirements and previously published material regarding chassis development was conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • A S Motorsport Ltd
    Hand Built Classic Cars from Norfolk, England A S Motorsport Ltd The ASM DBR Le Mans Photo Courtesy of P. Gunnar Recreating the glory with a Modern Icon INFORMATION AND SPECIFICATION www.asmotorsport.co.uk History of the DBR1 & DBR2 After acquiring Aston Martin in 1947, David Brown set his sights on victory at Le Mans. This goal was to be achieved in 1959 by the team of three DBR1’s. The triumphant DBR1/2 was driven by Carroll Shelby and Roy Salvadori. Maurice Trintignant and Paul Frere, in DBR1/4 finished in runner-up spot, and Sir Stirling Moss & Jack Fairman retired in their influential DBR1/3. The epic battle between Moss and the Ferrari’s in the early stages of the race caused the fragile Ferrari’s to become overstressed, and one by one, they retired. Thus Moss, in his sacrificial DBR1, cleared the way for Shelby and Salvadori to claim the chequered flag and give success to David Brown and Aston Martin in the 24 hour race. With other excellent race performances, including victory for the third year running, at Nurburgring and the Goodwood TT, Aston Martin would also secure the overall Sportscar World Title that year. Having achieved the double of Le Mans and the World Sportscar Championship, David Brown then announced the decision to concentrate their racing involvement in single seater car race series, with Formula One their main focus. Therefore the total production of DBR1’s numbered only five. The DBR2’s were prototypes constructed on a pair of backbone chassis that were left from the short lived 1955 Lagonda V12 race car project.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassis & Suspension
    Applications – Chassis & Suspension Introduction The chassis is considered to be one of the significant structures of an automobile. It is the frame which holds both the car body and the power train. Various mechanical parts like the engine and the drive train, the axle assemblies including the wheels, the suspension parts, the brakes, the steering components, etc., are bolted onto the chassis. The chassis provides the strength needed for supporting the different vehicular components as well as the payload and helps to keep the automobile rigid and stiff. Consequently, the chassis is also an important component of the overall safety system. Furthermore, it ensures low levels of noise, vibrations and harshness throughout the automobile. Suspension is the term given to the system of springs, shock absorbers and linkages that connects the vehicle to its wheels. The suspension system serves a dual purpose. It contributes to the car's road performance, the braking characteristics for good active safety and the driving pleasure. It also keeps the vehicle occupants comfortable and reasonably well isolated from road noise, bumps, and vibrations. Chassis design concepts Originally, automobile designs used the body-on-frame construction where a load-bearing chassis consisting of a ladder frame, the powertrain, and the suspension formed the base vehicle which then supported a non-load-bearing body. In the beginning used on almost all vehicles, the ladder frame has been gradually phased out on passenger cars around the 1940s in favor of perimeter frames. In the second half of the last century, the frame chassis design was more and more displaced by monocoque constructions, integrating the body and chassis into a single unit.
    [Show full text]