Conflict and Change in EU Budgetary Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conflict and Change in EU Budgetary Politics Running head recto i Conflict and Change in EU Budgetary Politics How does the European Union deal with conflict among member states and between institutions? This book provides an institutionalist analysis of an important feature of EU decision-making. Focusing on the dominance of conflict in EU budgetary politics, the author introduces the key actors and issues in European budgetary decision-making and traces the main developments in EU finances since the introduction of own- resources and parliamentary co-responsibility in the 1970s. With its analytical emphasis on distributive and institutional conflict, the author reveals the strong impact that rules and procedures have on the ability of EU actors to resolve conflict. Moreover, with its rigorous use of social science methodology, it makes a valuable contribution to the institutional research agenda and presents testable propositions on the influence of institutions and the emergence of institutional change. This book will be of considerable interest to students and researchers of European Union politics and those interested in institutionalist analysis. Johannes Lindner is Counsellor to the Executive Board of the European Central Bank. He holds masters degrees from the University of Cologne and the London School of Economics, as well as a doctorate from the University of Oxford. Routledge Advances in European Politics 1 Russian Messianism: 9 Democracy and Enlargement in Third Rome, revolution, Communism and Post-Communist Europe after The democratisation of the general public Peter J.S. Duncan in fifteen Central and Eastern European countries, 1991–1998 2 European Integration and the Christian W. Haerpfer Postmodern Condition Governance, democracy, identity 10 Private Sector Involvement in Peter van Ham the Euro The power of ideas 3 Nationalism in Italian Politics Stefan Collignon and Daniela Schwarzer The stories of the Northern League, 1980–2000 11 Europe Damian Tambini A Nietzschean perspective Stefan Elbe 4 International Intervention in the Balkans since 1995 12 European Union and Edited by Peter Siani-Davies E-Voting Addressing the European Parliament’s 5 Widening the European Union internet voting challenge The politics of institutional change and Edited by Alexander H. Trechsel and Fernando reform Mendez Edited by Bernard Steunenberg 6 Institutional Challenges in the 13 European Union Council European Union Presidencies Edited by Madeleine Hosli, Adrian van Deemen A comparative perspective and Mika Widgrén Edited by Ole Elgström 7 Europe Unbound 14 European Governance and Enlarging and reshaping the boundaries of Supranational Institutions the European Union Making states comply Edited by Jan Zielonka Jonas Tallberg 8 Ethnic Cleansing in the Balkans 15 European Union, NATO and Nationalism and the destruction of tradition Russia Cathie Carmichael Martin Smith and Graham Timmins 16 Business, The State and 25 Territory and Terror Economic Policy Conflicting nationalisms in the Basque The case of Italy Country G. Grant Amyot Jan Mansvelt Beck 17 Europeanization and 26 Multilateralism, German Foreign Transnational States Policy and Central Europe Comparing Nordic central governments Claus Hofhansel Bengt Jacobsson, Per Lægreid and Ove K. Pedersen 27 Popular Protest in East Germany 18 European Union Enlargement Gareth Dale A comparative history Edited by Wolfram Kaiser and Jürgen Elvert 28 Germany’s Foreign Policy Towards Poland and the Czech 19 Gibraltar Republic British or Spanish? Ostpolitik revisted Peter Gold Karl Cordell and Stephan Wolff 20 Gendering Spanish Democracy 29 Kosovo Monica Threlfall, Christine Cousins and Celia The politics of identity and space Valiente Denisa Kostovicova 21 European Union Negotiations 30 The Politics of European Union Processes, networks and negotiations Enlargement Edited by Ole Elgström and Christer Jönsson Theoretical approaches Edited by Frank Schimmelfennig and Ulrich 22 Evaluating Euro-Mediterranean Sedelmeier Relations Stephen C. Calleya 31 Europeanizing Social Democracy? 23 The Changing Face of European The rise of the party of European Identity Socialists A seven-nation study of (Supra)National Simon Lightfoot Attachments Edited by Richard Robyn 32 Conflict and Change in EU Budgetary Politics 24 Governing Europe Johannes Lindner Discourse, governmentality and European integration 33 Gibraltar, Identity and Empire William Walters and Jens Henrik Haahr Edward G. Archer Conflict and Change in EU Budgetary Politics Johannes Lindner I~ ~?io~!!;n~~~up LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2006 by Routledge Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2006 Johannes Lindner Typeset in Baskerville by Keystroke, Jacaranda Lodge, Wolverhampton The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercail-No Derivatives 4.0 license. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Lindner, Johannes, 1974– Conflict and change in EU budgetary politics / Johannes Lindner.—1st ed. p. cm. — (Routledge advances in European politics) Includes bibliographical references. 1. Budget—European Union countries. 2. Finance, Public—European Union countries. 3. Debts, Public—European Union countries. 4. Fiscal policy—European Union countries. I. Title. II. Series. HJ2094.L56 2005 352.4′094—dc22 2005011829 ISBN13: 978–0–415–35679–4 (hbk) ISBN13: 978–0–415–49917–0 (pbk) Running head recto vii Contents List of figures and tables ix Acknowledgements xiii List of abbreviations xvii 1 Introduction: An institutionalist perspective on conflict and change in EU budgetary politics 1 PART I Variation in the level of conflict in EU budgetary politics 21 2 A rational choice-institutionalist explanation of conflict in EU budgetary politics 23 3 Obstructing decision-making: conflict between Parliament and Council in the annual budgetary procedure (1974–1988) 46 4 Facilitating decision-making: cooperation between Parliament and Council in the annual budgetary procedure (1988–2000) 82 5 Blocking intergovernmental relations: conflict between the UK and the other member states over British net-contributions (1974–1984) 111 6 Accepting intergovernmental burden sharing: negotiations between Germany and the other member states over German net-contributions within the framework of the financial perspective (1992–1999) 130 7 Summary of the findings and update of the theoretical explanation 148 viii Contents PART II Institutional change in EU budgetary politics 157 8 A rational choice-institutionalist explanation of institutional change in EU budgetary politics 159 9 Resisting reform: the stability of the institutional path of the 1970 treaty and its final breakdown (1974–1988) 173 10 Initiating a new institutional path: stability of the financial perspective and the interinstitutional agreement (1988–2000) 188 11 Summary of the findings and update of the theoretical explanation 200 12 Conclusions 206 Appendix No. 1: The EU budget in figures 219 Appendix No. 2: Financial perspectives 221 Appendix No. 3: Net-contributions and net-benefits of member states 225 Notes 229 Bibliography 245 Index 261 Figures and Tables Figures 1.1 Overview of the development of expenditure at current prices in millions of Euros 4 1.2 Overview of the annual budgetary procedure 5 1.3 Indirect measure of the level of conflict in the annual budgetary procedures between 1974 and 2000 10 1.4 Indirect measure of the level of conflict over budgetary issues in the intergovernmental setting between 1975 and 2000 11 2.1 The domain of interaction-oriented policy research 23 2.2 Short-term oriented actor 26 2.3 Long-term oriented actor 26 2.4 The structure of the annual budget and the limit imposed by the revenue side 33 2.5 Interaction modes in EU budgetary politics 36 3.1 Conflict in the annual budgetary procedure between 1974 and 1978 47 3.2 Conflict in the annual budgetary procedure between 1979 and 1983 59 3.3 Profile of decisions on price increases for agricultural products (in percentages) 62 3.4 Different interpretations of expenditure classifications in the 1982 budget 67 3.5 Conflict in the annual budgetary procedure between 1984 and 1988 71 4.1 Conflict in the annual budgetary procedure between 1988 and 1994 83 4.2 Conflict in the annual budgetary procedure between 1995 and 2000 97 4.3 Increasing margins below the ceilings in Heading 3 and 4 100 5.1 Summits dominated by disputes over budgetary issues (1975–1988) 112 6.1 Summits dominated by disputes over budgetary issues (1988–2000) 130 6.2 Germany’s net-contributions to the EC budget (1987–1992) 134 6.3 Germany’s net-contributions to the EU budget (1992–1998) 143 7.1 Institutionalist explanation of the level of conflict 149 8.1 Cost of the forms of change 162 9.1 Subfields and interdependence in EC budgetary politics 180 x Figures and tables 11.1 Explanation of institutional stability and change 201 12.1 The annual budgetary procedure in the Constitution (Article III-404) 212 A1.1 Community expenditure from 1960 to 2002 by policies 219 A1.2 ‘Own-resources’ by revenue sources from 1971 to 2002 220 A1.3 Expenditure per capita from 1960 to 2002 (in 2002 prices) 220 A1.4 Expenditure as percentage of the Community’s GDP from 1960 to 2002 220 A3.1 Net-contributions and net-benefits of member states (1980–1990) 226 A3.2
Recommended publications
  • The European Commissioner for Trade in 2010-2014 (Barroso II Commission) Cecilia Malmström
    Торговельна політика ЄС Що Карел залишає Сесилії? Роберт Хорольський, к.ю.н., радник Юридичної фірми «ОМП» 24 вересня 2014 року, м. Київ Karel De Gucht • Born 1954, a Belgian politician • Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), liberal • In 2009-2010, European Commissioner for Development and Humanitarian Aid (Barroso I Commission) • The European Commissioner for Trade in 2010-2014 (Barroso II Commission) Cecilia Malmström • Born 1968, a Swedish politician • Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), liberal • In 2010-2014, European Commissioner for Home Affairs (Barroso II Commission) • The European Commissioner for Trade in 2014-2019 (Juncker Commission) European Commissioners for Trade since 1957 Jean Rey Belgium 1957–1962 Hallstein Commission I 1962–1967 Hallstein Commission II Jean-François Deniau France 1968–1970 Rey Commission Ralf Dahrendorf W.Germany 1970–1972 Malfatti Commission 1972–1973 Mansholt Commission Christopher Soames UK 1973–1977 Ortoli Commission Wilhelm Haferkamp W.Germany 1977–1981 Jenkins Commission 1981–1985 Thorn Commission Willy De Clercq Belgium 1985–1988 Delors Commission I Frans Andriessen Netherlands 1989–1992 Delors Commission II Leon Brittan UK 1993–1995 Delors Commission III 1995–1999 Santer Commission Pascal Lamy France 1999–2004 Prodi Commission Danuta Hübner Poland 2004 Prodi Commission Peter Mandelson UK 2004–2008 Barroso Commission I Catherine Ashton UK 2008–2009 Barroso Commission I Benita Ferrero-Waldner Austria 2009–2010 Barroso Commission I Karel De Gucht Belgium
    [Show full text]
  • The Bank of the European Union (Sabine Tissot) the Authors Do Not Accept Responsibility for the 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 Translations
    The book is published and printed in Luxembourg by 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 15, rue du Commerce – L-1351 Luxembourg 3 (+352) 48 00 22 -1 5 (+352) 49 59 63 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 U [email protected] – www.ic.lu The history of the European Investment Bank cannot would thus mobilise capital to promote the cohesion be dissociated from that of the European project of the European area and modernise the economy. 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 The EIB yesterday and today itself or from the stages in its implementation. First These initial objectives have not been abandoned. (cover photographs) broached during the inter-war period, the idea of an 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 The Bank’s history symbolised by its institution for the financing of major infrastructure in However, today’s EIB is very different from that which 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 successive headquarters’ buildings: Europe resurfaced in 1949 at the time of reconstruction started operating in 1958. The Europe of Six has Mont des Arts in Brussels, and the Marshall Plan, when Maurice Petsche proposed become that of Twenty-Seven; the individual national 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 Place de Metz and Boulevard Konrad Adenauer the creation of a European investment bank to the economies have given way to the ‘single market’; there (West and East Buildings) in Luxembourg. Organisation for European Economic Cooperation. has been continuous technological progress, whether 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 • 1958-2008 in industry or financial services; and the concerns of The creation of the Bank was finalised during the European citizens have changed.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament As a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AS A DRIVING FORCE OF CONSTITUTIONALISATION STUDY Abstract This report analyses the increasing role played by the European Parliament (EP) in the EU decision-making process. In the first part (Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5), it describes how the EP acquired more power in legislation, comitology, in the appointment of the European Commission and in the budgetary field. In the second part (Sections 6 and 7), the report illustrates the EP’s role in two relevant policy fields: economic governance and external trade agreements. The report demonstrates that EP’s formal and informal powers in legislation, comitology, Commission investiture, the budgetary process, economic governance and international agreements have increased strikingly since the Treaty of Rome. This empowerment is partially explained by the concern for democratic legitimacy on the part of some member states’ (and the Commission). To another important part the empowerment may be explained by the fact that treaties frequently contain ambiguous provisions and thus allow room for informal rules to emerge through bargaining specifying the details of treaty provisions. PE 536.467 EN This study was commissioned by the policy department for Citizen's Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the AFCO Committee. AUTHOR(S) Adrienne Héritier (Project leader), Catherine Moury, Magnus G. Schoeller Katharina L. Meissner, Isabel Mota. RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Mr Petr Novak Policy Department Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: poldep- [email protected] Manuscript completed in October 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Commission
    The European Commission Administration or Government? TOM KING MP CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES 57 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL 1999 THE AUTHOR The Rt Hon Tom King MP has been MP for Bridgwater since March 1970. He served in the Cabinets of Margaret Thatcher and John Major for a total of ten years, holding five posts including Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1985-89) and Secretary of State for Defence (1989-92). He has been Chairman of the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee since 1994. Acknowledgements The author is most grateful to Tessa Keswick for her positive response to his original suggestion for this pamphlet and to Martin McElwee and Tim Knox for their active interest and effort in helping to produce this work. Support towards research for this Study was given by the Institute for Policy Research. The Centre for Policy Studies never expresses a corporate view in any of its publications. Contributions are chosen for their independence of thought and cogency of argument. ISBN No. 1 897969 98 8 Centre for Policy Studies, August 1999 Printed by The Chameleon Press, 5 - 25 Burr Road, London SW18 CONTENTS Preface Summary 1 Introduction 1 2 The Structure of the European Community xx 3 The Commissioners xx 4 The Genesis and Historical Role of the Commission xx 5 The De-politicisation of the Commission xx 6 Conclusions xx PREFACE I FIRST REPRESENTED THE UNITED KINGDOM in the Council of Ministers of the European Community in 1979. Over six years, in the Environment, Transport and the Employment (Social Affairs) Councils (including the period during which the UK held the Presidency in 1984), I observed at first hand the workings of the Community.
    [Show full text]
  • REY Commission (1967-1970)
    COMPOSITION OF THE COMMISSION 1958-2004 HALLSTEIN Commission (1958-1967) REY Commission (1967-1970) MALFATTI – MANSHOLT Commission (1970-1973) ORTOLI Commission (1973-1977) JENKINS Commission (1977-1981) THORN Commission (1981-1985) DELORS Commission (1985) DELORS Commission (1986-1988) DELORS Commission (1989-1995) SANTER Commission (1995-1999) PRODI Commission (1999-2004) HALLSTEIN COMMISSION 1 January 1958 – 30 June 1967 TITLE RESPONSIBLITIES REPLACEMENT (Date appointed) Walter HALLSTEIN President Administration Sicco L. MANSHOLT Vice-President Agriculture Robert MARJOLIN Vice-President Economics and Finance Piero MALVESTITI Vice-President Internal Market Guiseppe CARON (resigned September 1959) (24 November 1959) (resigned 15 May 1963) Guido COLONNA di PALIANO (30 July 1964) Robert LEMAIGNEN Member Overseas Development Henri ROCHEREAU (resigned January 1962) (10 January 1962) Jean REY Member External Relations Hans von der GROEBEN Member Competition Guiseppe PETRILLI Member Social Affairs Lionello LEVI-SANDRI (resigned September 1960) (8 February 1961) named Vice-president (30 July 1064) Michel RASQUIN (died 27 April 1958) Member Transport Lambert SCHAUS (18 June 1958) REY COMMISSION 2 July 1967 – 1 July 1970 TITLE RESPONSIBLITIES REPLACEMENT (Date appointed) Jean REY President Secretariat General Legal Service Spokesman’s Service Sicco L. MANSHOLT Vice-president Agriculture Lionelle LEVI SANDRI Vice-president Social Affairs Personnel/Administration Fritz HELLWIG Vice-president Research and Technology Distribution of Information Joint
    [Show full text]
  • European Economic and Monetary Integration, and the Optimum Currency Area Theory
    EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic Papers 302| February 2008 European economic and monetary integration and the optimum currency area theory Francesco Paolo Mongelli EUROPEAN COMMISSION EMU@10 Research In May 2008, it will be ten years since the final decision to move to the third and final stage of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), and the decision on which countries would be the first to introduce the euro. To mark this anniversary, the Commission is undertaking a strategic review of EMU. This paper constitutes part of the research that was either conducted or financed by the Commission as source material for the review. Economic Papers are written by the Staff of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them. The Papers are intended to increase awareness of the technical work being done by staff and to seek comments and suggestions for further analysis. The views expressed are the author’s alone and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Commission. Comments and enquiries should be addressed to: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Publications B-1049 Brussels Belgium E-mail: [email protected] This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from the website http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications A great deal of additional information is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu) ISBN 978-92-79-08227-6 doi: 10.2765/3306 © European Communities, 2008 European Economic and Monetary Integration, and the Optimum Currency Area Theory Francesco Paolo Mongelli (ECB)∗ Abstract: This essay follows the synergies and complementarities between European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and the optimum currency area (OCA) theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilfried Loth Building Europe
    Wilfried Loth Building Europe Wilfried Loth Building Europe A History of European Unification Translated by Robert F. Hogg An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-042777-6 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-042481-2 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-042488-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover image rights: ©UE/Christian Lambiotte Typesetting: Michael Peschke, Berlin Printing: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Abbreviations vii Prologue: Churchill’s Congress 1 Four Driving Forces 1 The Struggle for the Congress 8 Negotiations and Decisions 13 A Milestone 18 1 Foundation Years, 1948–1957 20 The Struggle over the Council of Europe 20 The Emergence of the Coal and Steel Community
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Profile of the European Commissioners Abstract
    Regional Integration and the Expertise Dilemma: The Political Profile of The European Commissioners Cinthia Regina Campos. Professor at UNILAB. E-mail: [email protected] Ernani Carvalho. Professor at UFPE. E-mail: [email protected] Enivaldo Rocha. Professor at UFPE. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper seeks further evidence of the College member profile to assess whether the European Commissioners remain experts in their respective portfolios. Professional and political data for all former European Commissioners (N=287) was used. The paper concludes that there’s no significant evidence to affirm that European Commissioners have become less technocratic and more political actors. Key-words: European Comissisoners; Experts; Portifolios; Political Actors. 267 | Revista Política Hoje - Volume 28, n. 1 Regional Integration and the Expertise Dilemma: The Political Profile of The European Commissioners Cinthia Regina Campos – Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira Ernani Carvalho – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Enivaldo Rocha – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco 1. INTRODUCTION The European Commission (EC) is considered one of the most important institutions of the European system whether in light of its decision-making capacity, stemming from its power of legislative initiative, or by virtue of its role in the implementation and monitoring of community public policy. Still, since the EC’s creation sixty years ago, few empirical studies have been dedicated to tracing the poilitcal-professional profile of the members of the institution; thus, shedding light on the dynamics surrounding commissioners’ appointment and subsequent oversight In turn, these studies indicate that the EC has counted individuals with a predominantly political profile among its members (WONKA 2004; DÖRING 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Appointment of the Commission: Parliament's Role Before 1995
    Appointment of the Commission: Parliament's role before 1995 SUMMARY In September 2014, the Commissioners-designate for the Juncker Commission will be required to appear before the European Parliament’s committees as part of the procedure for the approval of the European Commission. This will be the fifth set of hearings to be held since 1995. But what about the Commissions prior to 1995? Did Parliament already have a role to play in the new Commission’s appointment in those days? With this briefing we provide a short account of the procedure used before 1995 and the long road which Parliament had to take to have its say in the appointment of the Commission. It has always been the tradition for each President of the Commission, when taking office, to deliver a general policy statement before Parliament. Until 1981, when Parliament approved the appointment of the Thorn Commission with its resolution of 12 February, the newly nominated President of the Commission gave a speech to Parliament in plenary. However, no vote of approval or of confidence was taken until 15 January 1985, when the first vote of confidence was passed in the first Delors Commission. Formal hearings of commissioners-designate were introduced as a result of the Maastricht Treaty. The first Commission to be subject to this new procedure was the Santer Commission in 1995. In this briefing: From Hallstein to Jenkins - statements before the EP Towards the vote of confidence - European Parliament resolutions Vote of confidence in the new Commission Vote of approval Main references EPRS Appointment of the Commission From Hallstein to Jenkins - statements before the European Parliament The Treaty of Rome (1958) did not contain provisions regarding the involvement of Parliament in the approval or nomination of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI Working Papers
    ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2010/80 ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES THE RISE OF EUROPEAN COMPETITION POLICY, 1950-1991: A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY SURVEY OF A CONTESTED POLICY SPHERE Laurent Warlouzet EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES The Rise of European Competition Policy, 1950-1991: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of a Contested Policy Sphere LAURENT WARLOUZET EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/80 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper, or other series, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © 2010 Laurent Warlouzet Printed in Italy, October 2010 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), directed by Stefano Bartolini since September 2006, is home to a large post-doctoral programme. Created in 1992, it aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research and to promote work on the major issues facing the process of integration and European society. The Centre hosts major research programmes and projects, and a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration and the expanding membership of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping European Union: the European Parliament and Institutional Reform, 1979-1989
    Shaping European Union: The European Parliament and Institutional Reform, 1979-1989 European Parliament History Series STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Wolfram Kaiser PE 630.271 – November 2018 EN Shaping European Union: The European Parliament and Institutional Reform, 1979-1989 Wolfram Kaiser Based on a large range of newly accessible archival sources, this study explores the European Parliament’s policies on the institutional reform of the European Communities between 1979 and 1989. It demonstrates how the Parliament fulfilled key functions in the process of constitutionalization of the present-day European Union. These functions included defining a set of criteria for effective and democratic governance, developing legal concepts such as subsidiarity, and pressurising the Member States into accepting greater institutional deepening and more powers for the Parliament in the Single European Act and the Maastricht Treaty. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR This study has been written by Professor Dr Wolfram Kaiser of the University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom, at the request of the Historical Archives Unit of the DIrectorate for the Library within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank Christian Salm for his helpful comments on earlier drafts of this study and Etienne Deschamps for his support in finding suitable illustrations for the text. ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Christian Salm, Historical Archives Unit To contact the publisher, please e-mail [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in September 2018. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Spitzenkandidaten and the Democratic Deficit
    Spitzenkandidaten and the Democratic Deficit How has the Rise and Repudiation of the Spitzenkandidaten Impacted the EU’s Perceived Democratic Deficit between 2014 & 2019? Alexander Fitzpatrick (s2522403) [email protected] Leiden University, the Netherlands Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Arts in International Relations: European Union Studies on the 3rd of July 2020 Supervised by Drs. Marije Cornelissen 14,998 Words. Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………..……..…...…3 Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………………………...….....4 Chapter Two: Political Philosophy Perspectives on Democratic Legitimacy and the Insulation & Delegation of Power…………………………………………………....7 2.1: Introductory Remarks…………………………………………………………………...…...7 2.2: Pluralist Perspectives on Electoral Accountability, Competition and Selection…….....…...…...8 2.3: Libertarian Perspectives on Voting and Paternalism………………………………….10 2.4: Social Democratic Perspectives on Paternalism and Gender Mainstreaming………...13 2.5: Deliberative Democratic Perspectives on Participation, Passivity and Transparency..15 2.6: Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...18 Chapter Three: Methodological Approach………………………………………………………….19 3.1: Variables…………………………………………………………………………….….19 3.2: Investigative Methods…………………………………………………………………..19 3.3: Theoretical Framework………………………………………………………………....21 Chapter Four: Tracing the (S)election of the President of the European Commission……………...24 4.1: Introductory Remarks…………………………………………………………………...24 4.2: Pre-Lisbon
    [Show full text]