Seward Park Mixed Use Development Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seward Park Mixed Use Development Project Phase 1A Archaeological Documentary Study Seward Park Mixed Use Development Project Block 346, Lot 40; Block 347, Lot 71; Block 352, Lots 1 and 28; Block 353, Lot 44; Block 354, Lots 1 and 12; Block 409, Lot 56; and Block 410, Lot 38 Lower East Side, New York, New York Prepared for: The New York City Economic Development Corporation 110 William Street New York, New York 10038 Prepared by: AKRF, Inc. 440 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10016 December 2011 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. ii List of Photographs ..................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. iii 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 A. Project Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1 B. Research Goals and Methodology ................................................................................................... 2 C. Previous Archaeological work in the area ....................................................................................... 3 2: Environmental and Physical Settings ................................................................................................... 5 A. Geology and Topography ................................................................................................................ 5 B. Hydrology ........................................................................................................................................ 6 C. Soils ................................................................................................................................................. 6 D. Paleoenvironment ............................................................................................................................ 6 E. Current Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 6 3: Precontact Period ................................................................................................................................... 8 A. Precontact Context ........................................................................................................................... 8 B. Previously Identified Native American Archaeological Sites ......................................................... 9 4: The Historic Period .............................................................................................................................. 11 A. The Early History of The Project site ............................................................................................ 11 B. Rising Tensions During the Revolution ......................................................................................... 12 C. 19th Century Site History .............................................................................................................. 13 D. 20th Century Site History .............................................................................................................. 15 E. Subsurface Infrastructure in the Vicinity of the Project Sites ........................................................ 16 F. Historic lots within Site 2 .............................................................................................................. 17 G. Historic lots within Site 3 .............................................................................................................. 20 H. Historic lots within Site 4 .............................................................................................................. 24 I. Historic lots within Site 5 .............................................................................................................. 28 J. Historic lots within Site 6 .............................................................................................................. 35 5: Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................................... 38 A. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 38 B. Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 39 References .................................................................................................................................................. 40 i List of Figures Figure 1: Project location and Location of Previously Identified Precontact Archaeological Sites. USGS Map, Brooklyn and Jersey City Quadrangles. Figure 2: Project Site Boundaries. Sanborn Insurance Map, 2007. Figure 3: Sanitary and Topographical Map of the City and Island of New York. E. Viele, 1865. Figure 4: The Taylor-Roberts Plan, 1797. Figure 5: Maps of the City of New York. W. Perris, 1857. Figure 6: Sanborn Map, 1905. Figure 7: Sanborn Map, 1922. Figure 8: Sanborn Map, 1951. List of Photographs See Figure 2 for Camera Angles Photograph 1: View southwest towards the parking lot situated on Site 2 from the intersection of Norfolk and Delancey Streets. Photograph 2: Looking northwest from the intersection of Suffolk and Broome Streets at the parking lot located on Site 3. Photograph 3: The southwestern corner of the parking lot on Site 4, looking northeast from the intersection of Suffolk and Broome Streets. Photograph 4: The existing structure along the northern side of Site 5. Photograph 5: Existing structures at 400 and 402 Grand Street along the southern side of Site 5. Photograph 6: Looking northeast at the parking lot on Site 5 from the intersection of Grand and Suffolk Streets. Photograph 7: Looking southeast at the parking lot on Site 5 from the intersection of Broome and Suffolk Streets. Photograph 8: The parking lot on Site 6, looking northeast from the intersection of Broome and Clinton Streets. Photograph 9: Aerial photograph of the project site. ii List of Tables Table 1: Previously Identified Archaeological Sites Within One Mile of the Project Area ............................... 4 Table 2: Street Elevation Changes .............................................................................................................. 6 Table 3: Previously Identified Native American Archaeological Sites .......................................................... 10 Table 4: Summary of Historic Properties Included within Site 2 (Modern Block 352, Lot 28) ........................ 18 Table 5: Summary of Historic Properties Included within Site 3 (Modern Block 346, Lot 40 [part]) ............... 21 Table 6: Summary of Historic Properties Included within Site 4 (Modern Block 346, Lot 40 [part]) ............... 26 Table 7: Summary of Historic Properties Included within Site 5 (Modern Block 346, Lot 40 [part]) ............... 30 Table 8: Summary of Historic Properties Included within Site 6 (Modern Block 347, Lot 71) ........................ 36 TOC-iii Chapter 1: Introduction A. PROJECT OVERVIEW The Office of the Deputy Mayor for Economic Development (ODMED), in coordination with the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC) and the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), proposes multiple discretionary actions to allow the implementation of an approximately 1.7 million-gross-square-foot mixed-use development on 10 City- owned sites. The 10 proposed development sites are located in Manhattan Community District 3 generally along Delancey and Essex Streets on the Lower East Side (see Figure 1). The project site also includes demapped sections of Broome and Suffolk Streets that would be mapped as City streets, and sections of Clinton and Delancey Streets that would be demapped. The approximately 6.6-acre project site is primarily composed of the following City-owned parcels (see Figure 2) Site 1: Block 409, Lot 56; Site 2: Block 352, Lots 1 and 28; Site 3: Block 346, Lot 40; Site 4: Block 346, Lot 40; Site 5: Block 346, Lot 40; Site 6: Block 347, Lot 71; Site 7: Block 410, Lot 38; this site will not be redeveloped under the proposed actions; Site 8: Block 354, Lot 1; Site 9: Block 353, Lot 44; and Site 10: Block 354, Lot 12. To facilitate the redevelopment project, a number of discretionary actions would be required. Adoption of proposed Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) actions would involve public review by a number of entities, which include, depending on the action, Manhattan Community Board 3, the Manhattan Borough President, the New York City Planning Commission, and the New York City Council. These actions include zoning map changes and zoning text amendments, zoning special permits, City map amendment, the disposition of City-owned property, and approval of Urban Development Action Area Project(s) (UDAAP). Mayoral and Borough Board approval of the business terms with
Recommended publications
  • Historic Lower Manhattan
    Historic Lower Manhattan To many people Lower Manhattan means financial district, where the large buildings are designed to facilitate the exchange of money. The buildings, streets and open spaces, however, recall events that gave birth to a nation and have helped shape the destiny of western civilization. Places such as St. Paul's Chapel and Federal Hall National Memorial exemplify a number of sites which have been awarded special status by the Federal Government. The sites appearing in this guide are included in the following programs which have given them public recognition and helped to assure their survival. National Park Service Since its inauguration in 1916, the National Park Service has been dedicated to the preservation and management of our country's unique national, historical and recreational areas. The first national park in the world—Yellowstone—has been followed by the addition of over 300 sites in the 50 states, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. National Park areas near and in Manhattan are: Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site, Fire Island National Seashore, Gateway National Recreation Area, Sagamore Hill National Historic Site, Hamilton Grange National Memorial, and General Grant National Memorial. National Historic Landmarks National Park Service historians study and evaluate historic properties throughout the country. Acting upon their findings the Secretary of the Interior may declare the properties eligible for designation as National National Parks are staffed by Park Rangers who can provide information As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Historic Landmarks. The owner of such a property is offered a certif­ to facilitate your visit to Lower Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers
    NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT NAME ADDRESS Manhattan Baruch 595- 605 FDR Drive Staten Island Berry Houses 44 Dongan Hills Brooklyn Farragut 228 York Street Manhattan Harborview Terrace 536 West 56th Street Brooklyn Howard 1620 E N Y Avenue Manhattan Lexington 115 East 98th Steet Brooklyn Marcus Garvey 1440 E N Y Avenue Bronx Monroe 1802 Story Avenue Bronx Pelham Parkway 975 Waring Avenue Brooklyn Pink 2702 Linden Boulevard Queens Ravenswood 34-35A 12th Street Queens Ravenswood 34-35A 12th Street Brooklyn Red Hook East 110 West 9th Street Brooklyn Saratoga Square 930 Halsey Street Manhattan Washington Hts Rehab (Groups I and II) 500 West 164th Street Manhattan Washington Hts Rehab (Groups I and II) 503 West 177th Street Manhattan Wilson 405 East 105th Steet Manhattan Wise Towers/WSURA 136 West 91st Steet Brooklyn Wyckoff Gardens 266 Wyckoff Street Page 1 of 148 10/01/2021 NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers POSTCO STATUS SPONSOR DE Occupied Henry Street Settlement, Inc. Occupied Staten Island Mental Health Society, Inc. 10306 Occupied Spanish Speaking Elderly Council - RAICES Occupied NYCHA 10019 NYCHA HOLD NYCHA 11212 Occupied Lexington Children's Center 10029 Occupied Fort Greene Senior Citizens Council 11212 Vacant NYCHA Occupied Jewish Association Services For the Aged Occupied United Community Centers Occupied HANAC, Inc. 11106 Occupied HANAC, Inc. Occupied Spanish Speaking Elderly Council - RAICES Occupied Ridgewood-Bushwick Sr Citizens Council, Inc. Vacant NYCHA Occupied Provider Name Unknown Occupied
    [Show full text]
  • Make Capital & Underline
    2012 NYC FALL INTERNSHIP PROGRAM PARKS AND RECREATION-015 Horticulture and Gardening Intern 102 Hester Street New York, NY 10002 Contact: Leslie Nusblatt Phone: (212) 360-8212 Fax: (212) 360-8263 Email: [email protected] AGENCY DESCRIPTION Parks & Recreation is the steward of more than 29,000 acres of land — 14 percent of New York City — including more than 5,000 individual properties ranging from Yankee Stadium and Central Park to community gardens and Greenstreets. We operate more than 800 athletic fields and nearly 1,000 playgrounds; we manage five major stadia, 600 tennis courts, 66 public pools, 51 recreational facilities, 17 nature centers, 14 golf courses, and 14 miles of beaches; we care for 800 monuments and 23 historic house museums; we look after 600,000 street trees, and two million more in parks. We are New York City’s principal provider of athletic facilities. We are home to free concerts, world-class sports events, and cultural festivals. The work of the agency goes far beyond the maintenance of 14% of New York City's land. Parks is the City's leading programmer of cultural, athletic and social activities, including nature walks, concerts, learn-to-swim classes, sports clinics, historic house tours, and much more. Each year Parks hosts annual events such as the WinterJam, Adventures NYC, the Pumpkin Festival and several others. In addition, Parks produces many special events, including concerts and movie premieres. In the summer, Parks' busiest season, the agency organizes free carnivals and concerts, and sends mobile recreation vans to travel throughout the five boroughs providing free rental equipment for skating, baseball, and miniature golf.
    [Show full text]
  • July 8 Grants Press Release
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Social Conditions
    Chapter 4: Social Conditions A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY This chapter addresses a variety of issues that support social conditions, including population and housing characteristics, community facilities and open spaces, and neighborhood character. The discussion of social conditions considers the entire MESA study area (depicted in Figure 3-1 in Chapter 3, above) with particular focus on the project corridor—the routes proposed for the various project alternatives—where the greatest potential for change would occur. Because none of the project alternatives have the potential to change social conditions in the secondary study area, where Build Alternatives 1 and 2 would add service along an existing subway line, this analysis is of the primary study area only. The analysis was conducted by first compiling existing data for population and housing, com- munity facilities and open spaces, and neighborhood character. The source for the population and housing data is the 1990 Census of Population and Housing. The inventory of community facilities is based on Community District Needs (1997) for Manhattan’s Community Boards, the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Property Lists (dated November 4, 1996), supplementary information provided by the various Community Boards within the study area, and the informa- tion gathered for the analysis of land use, zoning, and public policy in Chapter 3. The assessment of neighborhood character is based on information gathered for other chapters of this document, particularly including the analyses of land use (Chapter 3) and visual and aesthetic considerations (Chapter 6). After assessing the existing conditions in the study area, the expected changes in the future are considered, based on information compiled in Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cityland New Filings & Decisions | November 2013 Ulurp Pipeline
    CITYLAND NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | NOVEMBER 2013 ULURP PIPELINE New Applications Certified into ULURP PROJECT DESCRIPTION COMM. BD. ULURP NO. CERTIFIED 300 Lafayette Street Zoning text amendment and special permits MN 2 N140092ZRM; 10/7/2013 140093ZSM; 140095ZSM; 140096ZSM 688 Broadway Special permits MN 2 140055ZSM; 10/21/2013 140056ZSM 606 West 57th Street Zoning map amendment, zoning text amendments, special MN 4 130336ZMM; 10/21/2013 permit and authorization N130337ZRM; N130338ZRM; 130339ZSM; 130340ZAM Franklin Avenue Shuttle Bridges City map amendment BK 9 010345MMK; 10/21/2013 010371MMK; 010415MMK; 010421MMK Bergen Saratoga Apartments UDAAP designation, project approval and disposition of a c-o-p BK 16 140115HAK 10/7/2013 Yeshiva Rambam Disposition of City-owned property BK 18 140122PPK 10/21/2013 Braddock-Hillside Rezoning Zoning map amendment QN 13 140037ZMQ 10/21/2013 BSA PIPELINE New Applications Filed with BSA October 2013 APPLICANT PROJECT/ADDRESS DESCRIPTION APP. NO. REPRESENTATIVE VARIANCES Susan Golick 220 Lafayette St., MN Build residential building with ground-floor commercial use 294-13-BZ Marvin B. Mitzner Michael Trebinski 2904 Voorhies Ave., BK Enlarge 1-story dwelling (fl. area, lot coverage, parking) 286-13-BZ Eric Palatnik, PC N.Y. Methodist Hospital 473 6th St., BK Develop ambulatory care facility 289-13-BZ Kramer Levin Congregation Bet Yaakob 2085 Ocean Pkwy., BK Construct house of worship 292-13-BZ Sheldon Lobel, PC 308 Cooper LLC 308 Cooper St., BK Develop residential building in M1-1 district 297-13-BZ Sheldon Lobel, PC 134-22 35th Ave. LLC 36-41 Main St., QN Waive reqs. for fl.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Involvement in Redevelopment After the Expiration of Urban Renewal Plans
    Renewing Renewal: Community Involvement in Redevelopment After the Expiration of Urban Renewal Plans A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Preservation COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning by Caroline Thompson May 2020 Abstract Communities impacted by urban renewal in the mid-twentieth century were largely unable to stop the changes brought to their neighborhoods. The plans that operationalized urban renewal remained in place for over 40 years, with significant legislative, legal, and financial effort required to make any alterations. In New York City, many of the urban renewal areas and their governing plans have since expired, ushering in market-driven development and neighborhood changes. This thesis uses a mixed-methods approach to analyze the subsequent built environment changes and to explore community involvement through case studies of redevelopment in the former Seward Park Extension Urban Renewal Area (SPEURA) and Two Bridges Urban Renewal Area (TBURA). While many lots remain unchanged since the urban renewal era, those that have changed reflect local development preferences or the results of major rezonings. The case studies reveal the wide variety of methods of community involvement in site redevelopment, with implications for future participation in redevelopment in the city. Key words: urban renewal, participation, Two Bridges, Essex Crossing, Large-Scale Developments ii Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brier Rabbit Cityparks Puppetmobile Schedule April 2015 Park, Rec Center, and Playground Names Are Linked to Directions
    Brier Rabbit CityParks PuppetMobile Schedule April 2015 Park, Rec Center, and Playground names are linked to directions. Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9 AM Sunset Park Recreation Center BK Thursday, April 23, 2015 10 AM St James Recreation Center BX Friday, April 24, 2015 10 AM St James Recreation Center BX Tuesday, April 28, 2015 10:30 AM & 12 PM Brownsville Recreation Center BK Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:30 AM & 12 PM Brownsville Recreation Center BK Performances run approximately 45 minutes long *Also part of the SummerStage Kids festival ​ Brier Rabbit CityParks PuppetMobile Schedule May 2015 Park, Rec Center, and Playground names are linked to directions. Friday, May 1, 2015 9:15 & 10:30 AM PS 246, The Poe Center BX Saturday, May 2, 2015 1 & 3 PM Willowbrook Park SI Tuesday, May 5, 2015 9 & 10 AM Westbourne Park QN Wednesday, May 6, 2015 9:30 AM PS X140 Eagle Academy BX Thursday, May 7, 2015 TBD Sunset Park BK Friday, May 8, 2015 10 AM Herbert Von King Cultural Arts BK Center Saturday, May 9, 2015 TBD Inwood Hill Park MN Monday, May 11, 2015 9 & 10 AM PS 101K BK Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:30 AM PS 119 BX Wednesday, May 13, 2015 9 & 10 AM P723X BX Thursday, May 14, 2015 TBD Queens Hospital QN Friday, May 15, 2015 9 & 10:30 AM Painters Playground QN Monday, May 18, 2015 9:30 AM PS 72 BX Tuesday, May 19, 2015 4 PM Faber Park SI Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:45 & 9:45 AM PS 244Q QN Thursday, May 21, 2015 4 PM St James Recreation Center BX Friday, May 22, 2015 9:30 AM PS 304 BX Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9 AM CS 152 BX Thursday, May 28, 2015 9 AM PS 96 QN Friday, May 29, 2015 10:30 AM Springfield Park QN Saturday, May 30, 2015 12 - 3 PM Highland Park, Strawberry Festival QN ​ ​ Sunday, May 31, 2015 2 PM Stuyvesant Square MN Performances run approximately 45 minutes long *Also part of the SummerStage Kids festival ​ Brier Rabbit CityParks PuppetMobile Schedule June 2015 Park, Rec Center, and Playground names are linked to directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Oysterponds Historical Society Collections Care Plan
    Oysterponds Historical Society Collections Care Plan Prepared for: Oysterponds Historical Society 1555 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 Prepared By: Jan Hird Pokorny Associates, Inc. Rainey Tisdale th 39 West 37 ​ Street, Floor 12A 41 Amherst Street ​ New York, NY 10018 Boston, MA 02131 212-759-6462 617-835-0244 May 23, 2019 Oysterponds Historical Society Collections Care Plan 23 May 2019 Table of Contents ​ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION 5 Purpose Background and History of Collections Planning at OHS Methodology Location Plan DEVELOPING A COLLECTIONS PHILOSOPHY FOR OHS 10 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION & ASSESSMENT 17 What OHS Is Doing Well The Campus Village House Old Point Schoolhouse Amanda Brown Schoolhouse Webb House Red Barn Hallock Building Vail House The Collections RECOMMENDATIONS 53 Recommendations for Care & Preservation Recommendations for Use Recommendations by Building APPENDICES 74 A. New Collecting Scope B. Collection Items by Type C. Datalogger Analysis D. 50 Year Flood Map E. Consultant Bios F. Report Details CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT Page 1 Oysterponds Historical Society Collections Care Plan 23 May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Like many historical societies and museums, the Oysterponds Historical Society faces significant challenges in collections stewardship. These challenges include having adequate space to store collections appropriately while maintaining a balance between programming, interpretive spaces, and staff spaces, and operating within the constraints of finite staff, operating and capital resources. The team of museum collections consultant Rainey Tisdale (Tisdale) and building preservationists Jan Hird Pokorny Associates (JHPA) was retained to examine the society’s campus, structures, and collections holistically in an effort to: 1. fully understand the organization’s operations and needs focused on collections; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011)
    City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Borou Block Lot Address Parcel Name gh 1 2 1 4 SOUTH STREET SI FERRY TERMINAL 1 2 2 10 SOUTH STREET BATTERY MARITIME BLDG 1 2 3 MARGINAL STREET MTA SUBSTATION 1 2 23 1 PIER 6 PIER 6 1 3 1 10 BATTERY PARK BATTERY PARK 1 3 2 PETER MINUIT PLAZA PETER MINUIT PLAZA/BATTERY PK 1 3 3 PETER MINUIT PLAZA PETER MINUIT PLAZA/BATTERY PK 1 6 1 24 SOUTH STREET VIETNAM VETERANS PLAZA 1 10 14 33 WHITEHALL STREET 1 12 28 WHITEHALL STREET BOWLING GREEN PARK 1 16 1 22 BATTERY PLACE PIER A / MARINE UNIT #1 1 16 3 401 SOUTH END AVENUE BATTERY PARK CITY STREETS 1 16 12 MARGINAL STREET BATTERY PARK CITY Page 1 of 1390 09/28/2021 City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Agency Current Uses Number Structures DOT;DSBS FERRY TERMINAL;NO 2 USE;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DSBS IN USE-TENANTED;LONG-TERM 1 AGREEMENT;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DSBS NO USE-NON RES STRC;TRANSIT 1 SUBSTATION DSBS IN USE-TENANTED;FINAL COMMITMNT- 1 DISP;LONG-TERM AGREEMENT;NO USE;FINAL COMMITMNT-DISP PARKS PARK 6 PARKS PARK 3 PARKS PARK 3 PARKS PARK 0 SANIT OFFICE 1 PARKS PARK 0 DSBS FERRY TERMINAL;IN USE- 1 TENANTED;FINAL COMMITMNT- DISP;LONG-TERM AGREEMENT;NO USE;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DOT PARK;ROAD/HIGHWAY 10 PARKS IN USE-TENANTED;SHORT-TERM 0 Page 2 of 1390 09/28/2021 City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Land Use Category Postcode Police Prct
    [Show full text]
  • The Radio Urbanism of Robert C. Weinberg, 1966–71 by Christopher Neville for the New York Preservation Archive Project
    “Building and Rebuilding New York:” The Radio Urbanism of Robert C. Weinberg, 1966–71 by Christopher Neville for the New York Preservation Archive Project “...This is Robert C. Weinberg, critic-at-large in architecture and planning for WNYC.” Introduction: Robert Weinberg, Department of Parks (under Robert Moses), New York City, and WNYC and at the Department of City Planning. Robert C. Weinberg was an architect and urban planner active in New York from the He taught courses in planning and related early 1930s until his death in 1974. Over four fields at New York University, the Pratt Insti- decades of vigorous engagement with preser- tute, the New School for Social Research, and vation and planning issues, he was both an ac- Yale, and published roughly 150 articles and tive participant in or astute observer of almost reviews. He was also the co-editor, with every major development in New York urban- Henry Fagin, of the important 1958 report, ism. Between 1966 and 1971, near the end of Planning and Community Appearance, jointly his career, he served as radio station WNYC’s sponsored by the New York chapters of the “critic-at-large in architecture and planning,” American Institute of Architects and the and his broadcasts are a window onto his re- American Institute of Planners. markable career and the transformations he But over his long career, Weinberg devoted witnessed in the city he loved. Weinberg’s the bulk of his considerable energies to a long personal history in the trenches and be- broad range of public-spirited efforts covering hind the scenes gave him unique perspective almost every aspect of urban development and on these changes—an insider’s overview, with city life, including historic preservation, zon- a veteran’s hindsight.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the Seward Park Cooperative [1961] [1] Abraham E
    THE STORY OF THE SEWARD PARK COOPERATIVE [1961] [1] ABRAHAM E. KAZAN Abraham E. Kazan [1] (1889-1971) This is the story of the Seward Park Housing Corporation, a cooperative development, Abraham E. Kazan was among the pioneers of the idea of cooperative housing. Gro- built, owned and operated for the benefit of 1,728 families who decided to use the wing up as an eyewitness to appalling tenement conditions, Kazan believed that housing method of mutual self-help to solve their housing problem. The project was conceived was a vital obstacle for the average person. As the president of the Amalgamated and completed under the guidance of the United Housing Foundation, a federation of Clothing Workers (ACW) Credit Union, Kazan understood that most people, rich and cooperative housing societies, non-profit organizations and labor unions interested in poor, usually considered a home as “purely a product of his own efforts.” Yet, unlike all promoting better housing through the consumer cooperative method. other routine necessities, owning a home required a sizable initial investment that was usually beyond that of those with moderate means or salaries. He felt that this made In 1957 the Seward Park Houses was the second Title I development undertaken by the newly constructed buildings often out of reach for the poorer earners, causing harsher United Housing Federation. It owes its existence to the successful completion in 1956 social and moral conditions with the tenement communities where the poorer people of the East River Housing Corporation, a housing cooperative for 1,672 families which lived in tightly congested clusters.
    [Show full text]