DOCSLIB.ORG

Sociology of Development Honours: Development Theory Course

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sociology of Development Honours: Development Theory Course Department of Sociology & Industrial Sociology Prince Alfred Street, Makhanda, 6139, South Africa Tel: +27 (0) 46 603 8361/7544 www.ru.ac.za/sociology SOCIOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES HONOURS 2021: Term 1 DEVELOPMENT THEORY LECTURERS Prof. Monty J. Roodt ([email protected]) Mr Thoko Sipungu ([email protected]) Ms Tarryn Alexander ([email protected]) 2 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the honours course on Development Theory! Section 1 of the course, taught by Professor Monty Roodt, will consist of four seminars over two weeks. It will cover an introduction to the concept of development, and the history of the main development theories. We will not cover feminist theories of development as there is a separate course covering this important topic, run by Professor Michael Drewett. Section 2 will be taught by Mr Thoko Sipungu. This section hopes to provide theoretical and practical understandings of development through an examination of the capabilities and right- based paradigms to development insofar as they relate and apply to disability. Section 3 will be taught by Ms Tarryn Alexander. Section three introduces post-development theory and its critique of the power relations and orientalist thinking which permeates Eurocentric development discourses. In the final week we look at the notion of “the developmental state” in the context of South Africa. There will be an essay for each of the three sections which comprise the course mark. SECTION 1: DEVELOPMENT THEORIES This section will start with an introduction to the concept of development and how it has evolved over the decades from the colonial period, through what has become known as the “first development decade” in the period after the Second World War, into the period of neoliberalism and globalisation where the environmental/food and the world capitalist crises have prompted calls for the entire development enterprise to be abandoned. Alan Thomas usefully distinguishes three main senses or contemporary meanings of the term ‘development’: as a vision, description, or measure of the state of being of a desirable society as a historical process of social change in which societies are transformed over long periods as consisting of deliberate efforts aimed at improvement on the part of various agencies, including governments, all kinds of organisations and social movements (cited in Bernstein, 2006: 45). Bernstein (2006: 45) continues: “Underlying this lucid and concise characterisation are the dramatic and contradictory histories of the formation of the modern world, of how people located differentially in the times and places of its processes have tried to make sense of them, and of the effects of those understandings for more or less coherent political projects and other forms of collective action (combining ‘vision’ and ‘deliberate efforts aimed at improvement’)”. 2 After this introduction, the course moves on to an analysis of the three conventional post-Second World War development paradigms. As Kothari points out, this heralds what for many development courses is the starting point of “development studies” – the post-World War II reconstruction of Europe and Japan under the auspices of the Marshall Plan and the subsequent ascendency of “modernisation theory” as the capitalist orthodoxy within the context of the competing paradigms of the “Cold War”. Here a critical examination of dual economy theory and Rostow’s stages of economic growth will take precedent. The failure of modernisation theory to stimulate development along first world lines or to decrease the gross inequality between so-called first and third world countries gave rise initially to the unequal-exchange and import-substitution theories of the Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA) under the leadership of Raul Prebisch, but these were soon eclipsed by the more radical analysis of the South American structuralists (mainly historians), dependency theorists (Andre Gunder Frank) and world-systems theorists (Emmanuel Wallerstein), who attempted to link the continued “underdevelopment” of the ex-colonies to the fact that these countries were locked into a structural position within the world capitalist system of on‐going exploitation stemming from their colonial past. While the world systems theory provided an important critical analysis of international inequality and post‐colonial exploitation, many development practitioners felt that these theories were big on critique but low on practical pointers for a way out of the ‘development impasse’. The result was the emergence of a development paradigm known as “Basic Needs” or “Redistribution with Growth”, which combined a trenchant critique of modernisation theory with a set of alternative strategies for development. These strategies involved greater state involvement in the development process and redirection of development efforts from capital-intensive urban industrialisation to labour-intensive rural agriculture and agro-industry, combined with active citizen participation in the development process. The failure of the basic needs approach has been blamed as much on the lack of political will, both from international players and from local political elites, as it has on the resurgence of the modernisation orthodoxy, this time in an updated form more suited to a globalizing world, known as neo‐liberalism. The neo‐liberal framework, implemented in the developing world under the auspices of the international financial institutions, namely the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank through its structural adjustment programmes, is predicated on the reduction of state spending, export orientation and the opening of national borders to international trade and investment. Requirements for Section 1 You do not do a degree, you read for a degree. This is especially true for post-graduate courses. You are expected to read widely as possible and participate in the Zoom meetings with a three to five-page type-written preparation for every seminar (except the first seminar where I will 2 introduce the course). These seminar preparations will serve as the basis for your active participation in the seminars and as the raw material for your essay. Having listened to other people’s presentations and participated in the discussion, you will have the opportunity to revise your paper before writing the essay. I will select people randomly to present on the topic under discussion, so you need to have your initial three-page preparation done for each seminar. Times: Mondays – 11 am to 1 pm Thursdays – 11 am to 1 pm Essay Topic for Section 1 Critically evaluate the concept of development taking into consideration the different theories of development studied in Section 1. The essay must be one and a half spacing Times New Roman font and between 7 – 8 pages long, and properly referenced with appropriate subheadings and title. Please consult Handout No 1 for the university’s policy on plagiarism and the department’s policy on referencing. Please do not send it to me as a PDF document or in Google Docs, Microsoft Word only. Submission Date: Monday, March 28 Seminar Topics and Readings Week 1: Monday Introduction to Development and Development Studies Introduction to the concept of development Henry Bernstein’s characterisation of development as dramatic and contradictory histories of the formation of the modern world A broader concept of development. Seminar/Assignment Topic What do you understand the term “development” to mean given the change in its initial focus on economic growth to a broader understanding that includes social, cultural, gender, environmental and political aspects? Readings Barder, O. (2010) Development and complexity. London: Centre for Global Development. (On RUConnected) 2 Bernstein, H. (2006). Studying development/development studies. London: Routledge. Kothari, U. & Minogue, M. (eds.) (2002). Development theory and practice: Critical perspectives. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave. Available at: https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=&id=1GwZCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=kot hari+uma&ots=YEJeUmgijR&sig=Bkswfaxl_oruvWbKkIJZchswGjY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage &q=kothari%20uma&f=false Kothari, U. (2005). A radical history of development studies: Individuals, institutions and ideologies. Cape Town: David Philip; London, New York: Zed Books. Available at: https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WvdiDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT45&dq=Fro m+Colonial+Administration+to+Development+Studies:+a+Postcolonial+Critique+of+the+Histo ry+of+Development+Studies&ots=IKNrz4r_Qv&sig=p0ijdgWv45jZsGjpEEWr8UmmwNQ&re dir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=From%20Colonial%20Administration%20to%20Development%20Stu dies%3A%20a%20Postcolonial%20Critique%20of%20the%20History%20of%20Development %20Studies&f=false Sachs, W. (ed.) (1992). The development dictionary. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press. Chapter 1. Available at: https://books.google.co.za/books?id=2bi_kf7QAq4C&pg=PA1&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=on epage&q&f=false SOAS (2021) Understanding sustainable development. London: London University. (On RUConnected) Sumner, A., (2008) What is ‘development’? In: A. Sumner & M. Tribe (eds.) International development studies: Theories and methods in research and practice. London: SAGE. (On RuConnected). Week 1: Thursday Modernisation Theory • Modernisation as a model of progress • Post-second-world-war reconstruction: Marshall Plan • Dual‐economy theory: Lewis, Hobart‐Houghton • Rostow’s stages of economic growth • Modernisation theory and neo-liberalism/structural adjustment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elusive Development by Marshall Wolfe
    Elusive Development by Marshall Wolfe . »JLL»/ United Nations United Nations Research Institute Economic Commission for for Social Development Latin America Printed by S'*! Hungary, 1981 Statistical Publishing House Contents Acknowledgments ........................................... P reface ............................................................... in CHAPTER ONE: Why Elusive Development? 1 CHAPTER TWO: The Quest for a Unified Approach 11 Background of the unified approach project of UNRISD and ECLA — Methodology and institutional constraints - Differing approaches that emerged and their underlying supposition — The changing international market for propositions on development during and since the unified approach project - The place of the unified approach project in the inter­ national rethinking of development - Lessons for the future and needs for international research. CHAPTER THREE: Development Images, Agents and Choices............................. 55 Images of development - Concepts, values and criteria for styles of develop­ ment — A digression on the practical - Choices aiming at an acceptable and viable style of development. CHAPTER FOUR: Approaches to Development: Who is Approaching what? 75 Development under question: The feasibility of national choice between alternative styles — The setting within which developmental choices present themselves — Policy approaches to the challenge of “unified”, “original”, or “human-oriented” styles of development. CHAPTER FIVE: Social and Political Structures and Development Policy
    [Show full text]
  • W. Arthur Lewis and the Dual Economy of Manchester in the 1950S
    This is a repository copy of Fighting discrimination: W. Arthur Lewis and the dual economy of Manchester in the 1950s. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/75384/ Monograph: Mosley, P. and Ingham, B. (2013) Fighting discrimination: W. Arthur Lewis and the dual economy of Manchester in the 1950s. Working Paper. Department of Economics, University of Sheffield ISSN 1749-8368 2013006 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series SERP Number: 2013006 ISSN 1749-8368 Paul Mosley Barbara Ingham Fighting Discrimination: W. Arthur Lewis and the Dual Economy of Manchester in the 1950s March 2013 Department of Economics University of Sheffield 9 Mappin Street Sheffield S1 4DT United Kingdom www.shef.ac.uk/economics 1 Fighting Discrimination: W.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mini-Literature Review Student Identity Development Theory
    Mini-Literature review Student Identity Development Theory INTRODUCTION Student development theory is an area of study that tries to identify, describe, explain and predict human behaviors as student’s transition from adolescence to adulthood. Over the past few decades, the study of student development has paid particular focus on identity development of college students. As colleges welcome a more complex and diverse student population, the study (and practice) of college student identity development now considers a more holistic approach. It is a theoretical orientation where political, historical and cultural contexts place socially constructed factors on identity development. Drawing on both foundational scholarship and current research, the purpose of this review is to present the more holistic perspective of identity development currently followed by scholars and researchers in the field to inform a more inclusive learning environment within higher education. One of the more widely used and referenced books on identity development for college students is the 1998 book, Student Development in College. Now in its 2nd edition, the book was one of the first to combine development theories into a series of categories ranging from psychosocial theories, cognitive and moral theories to typological and person-environmental theories. Each theory addressed in the book seeks to answer the following developmental questions (Knefelkamp, Widick, & Parker, 1978 in Evans, Forney, Guido, Renn, and Patton, 2010 p. 24): 1. What interpersonal and intrapersonal changes occur while the student is in college? 2. What factors lead to this development? 3. What aspect of the college environment encourage or retard growth? 4. What development outcomes should we strive to achieve in college? FOUNDATIONAL THEORIES ON STUDENT DEVELOPMENT One of the foundational theories addressed in Student Development in College is Chickering’s Theory of Identity Development.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Universities with Global Studies Programs Or Programs of Similar
    25 UNIVERSITIES WITH GLOBAL STUDIES PROGRAMS OR PROGRAMS OF SIMILAR INTEREST *This list is not meant to be extensive but to provide you with a starting point when exploring your post-secondary options. What is a Global Studies Major? According to the The College Board: “Global studies majors are “global thinkers” in every sense. Drawing from fields as different as geography, music, political science, and ecology, they look at the connections between nations and peoples and the trends that shape our lives. And global studies majors don’t just think on a large scale. They may study how something like climate change can affect hundreds of nations, but they also consider its effects on their own backyard.” Potential Career Paths: Foreign Service/State Department; International business, including working for a domestic American corporation in their international operations, or working for a corporation abroad; Entrepreneurialism; International law; International development and sustainable development; International non-profit work or activism on environment, human rights, social justice, etc.; Journalism and other communications media; Education, especially teaching and administration at the high school level and above. Click here to see more about what you can do with a Global Studies Degree 1. BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY The International and Global Studies (IGS) Program is an interdisciplinary program that provides students with an opportunity to understand the complex processes of globalization that have so profoundly affected politics, economics, culture, society, the environment and many other facets of our lives. 2. BROWN UNIVERSITY: WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES The Watson Institute is a community of scholars whose work aims to help us understand and address the world's great challenges, such as globalization, economic uncertainty, security threats, environmental degradation, and poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Development Theory in the Sociological and Political Analyses of the New States
    POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY IN THE SOCIOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL ANALYSES OF THE NEW STATES by ROBERT HARRY JACKSON B.A., University of British Columbia, 1964 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Political Science We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, I966 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission.for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Polit_i_g^j;_s_gience The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date September, 2, 1966 ii ABSTRACT The emergence since World War II of many new states in Asia and Africa has stimulated a renewed interest of sociology and political science in the non-western social and political process and an enhanced concern with the problem of political development in these areas. The source of contemporary concepts of political development can be located in the ideas of the social philosophers of the nineteenth century. Maine, Toennies, Durkheim, and Weber were the first social observers to deal with the phenomena of social and political development in a rigorously analytical manner and their analyses provided contemporary political development theorists with seminal ideas that led to the identification of the major properties of the developed political condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts of Inequality Development Issues No
    Development Strategy and Policy Analysis Unit w Development Policy and Analysis Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs Concepts of Inequality Development Issues No. 1 21 October 2015 Inequality—the state of not being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities1—is a concept very much at the heart Summary of social justice theories. However, it is prone to confusion in public debate as it tends to mean different things to different The understanding of inequality has evolved from the people. Some distinctions are common though. Many authors traditional outcome-oriented view, whereby income is distinguish “economic inequality”, mostly meaning “income used as a proxy for well-being. The opportunity-oriented inequality”, “monetary inequality” or, more broadly, inequality perspective acknowledges that circumstances of birth are in “living conditions”. Others further distinguish a rights-based, essential to life outcomes and that equality of opportunity legalistic approach to inequality—inequality of rights and asso- requires a fair starting point for all. ciated obligations (e.g. when people are not equal before the law, or when people have unequal political power). Concerning economic inequality, much of the discussion has on poverty reduction. Pro-poor growth approaches made their boiled down to two views. One is chiefly concerned with the debut and growth and equity (through income redistribution) inequality of outcomes in the material dimensions of well-being were seen as separate policy instruments, each capable of address- and that may be the result of circumstances beyond one’s control ing poverty. The central concern was in raising the incomes of (ethnicity, family background, gender, and so on) as well as talent poor households.
    [Show full text]
  • Development, Post-, Anti-, and Populist: a Critical Review
    Environment and Planning A 2000, volume 32, pages 1033 ^ 1050 DOI:10.1068/a3251 Development, post-, anti-, and populist: a critical review Piers Blaikie School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England; e-mail: [email protected] Received 2 April 1999; in revised form 9 September 1999 Abstract. The notion and practice of development have been severely critiqued from both modernist and postmodernist perspectives, yet the global development industry flourishes. The latter have afforded important insights, but also suffer from unexamined ideological agendas, a disinclination to undertake detailed research into development processes and policy, a preoccupation with texts and representations by the development industry, and from perpetuating an indulgent and agenda-less academic cul-de-sac. Instead, the postmodern critique of development could lead to a more politically astute and practical reconstruction of certain aspects of `development', particularly in the neopopulist mode of developmentalism. Three powerful development paradigms are identified, and the ways in which they are constructed, promoted, and adapted are discussed in the light of conflicting modernist and postmodern accounts. Postmodern engagement with development There has been a profound sense of disappointment and reappraisal in the global development project since the 1960s, yet the project continues. This has come about after a long history of modernist critiques, which have judged the results of develop- ment in their own terms (it failed to deliver what it promised), as well as the more recent postmodern turn which social science has taken, which has sought to portray development as a metanarrative ripe for deconstruction, and to interrogate its intellec- tual and epistemological foundations, but, I argue, has led development debate into some confusing and exposed terrains.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Research: an Annotated Bibliography Center for International Education
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Participatory Research & Practice Center for International Education 1991 Participatory Research: An Annotated Bibliography Center for International Education Peter Park David Kinsey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ cie_participatoryresearchpractice Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons Center for International Education; Park, Peter; and Kinsey, David, "Participatory Research: An Annotated Bibliography" (1991). Participatory Research & Practice. 5. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cie_participatoryresearchpractice/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Education at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Participatory Research & Practice by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Participatory Research: An Annotated Bibliography By Center for Community Education & Action & t"------~-- C enter for International Education 1991 Cover and inside graphics by Mansour Fakih Participatory Research: An Annotated Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Center for Community Education and Action, Inc. Northampton, MA Center for International Education University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 1991 This bibliography has been printed with the assistance of the University Store's Textbook Annex at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Copyright 1991 by the Center for Community Education & Action, Inc., Northampton, MA and the Center for International Education, Amherst, MA. Acknowledgements This bibliography is an attempt to bring together references on participatory research for the purpose of sharing them with interested practitioners and scholars. It began as a project of the Center for Community Education and Action, Inc. (CCEA) to annotate and disseminate its resource materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology's Contribution to the Study of Comparative International
    Special Issue: Population and Development: Comparative Anthropological Perspectives Introduction Daniel Jordan Smith and Jennifer A. Johnson-Hanks The methods and approaches of anthropology make the discipline particularly well positioned to understand how populations are implicated in, and respond to, development programs. These methods and approaches include in-depth explorations of how power operates, the exposition of long-term effects of policies and programs on everyday life, the careful focus on the relationship between the values people articulate when asked directly and their actual lived practices, and the insistence on intimate research conducted over long periods of time. But anthropology’s contribution to the study of comparative international development has been marginal compared to that of other social sciences such as economics, political science, and sociology. The relative dearth of anthropology articles in most issues of this journal is representative of a wider pattern in development studies publications. The explanation for anthropology’s outsider status is worth considering. In part, many anthropologists who study development are highly critical of dominant paradigms, and choose not to situate their work in relation to mainstream academic discourse on the topic. Anthropologists commonly ask, for example, who determines what development even means, and we worry whether it actually benefits those in whose name it is undertaken. Indeed, much of the anthropological literature suggests that development reinforces rather than ameliorates inequalities. Anthropology’s critical stance toward development may also lead its perspective to be excluded from debates where – at least from many anthropologists’ point of view – the prevailing wisdom accepts assumptions that our discipline questions. And anthropology does itself – and the populations we care about – no favors when we write about development, power, and inequality in insular jargon, excluding others who we often lament do not listen to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Development Theory
    Student Development Theory Carolyn Farley Michael Walker Why is Student Development Theory Important? Justifies our profession and legitimatizes relevance of Student Affairs Professionals Helps us understand our audience; talk their language Helps us “meet students where they are” Teaches us how students rationalize, behave and develop as human beings Helps us understand opportunities and limits 2 SDT also… Helps us: understand where students are within a human development continuum (where they were and where they are going developmentally); understand how to address the “whole person” complement academics with co-curriculars; account for the development and needs of special populations Provides “description, explanation, prediction, and control” (DiCaprio, 1974, in Forney, Evans & Guido-DiBrito, 1998). Characteristics of Millennials Through their research, Howe and Strauss (2000) found that seven key characteristics define today’s 18-22 year old college students (as well as 23-25 year old graduate students). These traits include: Special - many from smaller families with fewer siblings to compete with, so received greater attention and increased security from mom and dad (known as “helicopter parents” due to their constant hovering around their children). Sheltered - more than previous generations, parents kept them closer to home with a focus on safety and connection to family, but also involved with many organized activities and sports. Confident - increased parental involvement and coaching/external adult involvement gave them lots of support and self-confidence. Student Affairs: Creating Experiences for Life Millennial Characteristics cont. Team-oriented - grew up among most diverse American population ever, and learned to be civil and less “me-oriented” than previous generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Paradigms of Human Resource Development
    EXPLORING PARADIGMS OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT A Dissertation by ANDREW CHRISTOPHER HURT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Major Subject: Educational Human Resource Development EXPLORING PARADIGMS OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT A Dissertation by ANDREW CHRISTOPHER HURT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Co-Chairs of Committee, Gary N. McLean Susan A. Lynham Committee Members, Toby M. Egan Manda H. Rosser Head of Department, Fredrick M. Nafukho August 2010 Major Subject: Educational Human Resource Development iii ABSTRACT Exploring Paradigms of Human Resource Development. (August 2010) Andrew Christopher Hurt, B.S., Purdue University; M.S., Purdue University Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. Gary N. McLean Dr. Susan A. Lynham This study focused on the issue of paradigms in Human Resource Development (HRD). Its purpose was to validate the HRD Cube as a synthesized model of HRD and to explicate some of the extant paradigms of HRD. The study was carried out by examining the text of articles published in Academy of Human Resource Development (AHRD)-sponsored journals. Purposeful, stratified, and random sampling was used to select 16 articles published in AHRD-sponsored journals. Articles were treated as if they were the representative voice(s) of their author(s). Data units from within each article were identified and coded using two sequential techniques. First, units were axially coded and sorted into one of seven pre-determined categories based on the axioms of theory, research, and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Development Studies AA Degree
    CURRICULUM GUIDE 2017-2018 HUMAN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Associate in Arts in Human Development Studies The associate degree in Human Development Studies offered by Ohlone College is designed to prepare students for studying Anthropology, Environmental Studies, Psychology, Sociology, and other related subjects at most colleges and universities. While the core courses required in the associate degree in Human Development Studies will fulfill the lower division major requirements at most universities, students are advised to meet with academic counselors to assess the course requirements for specific universities. This program will enable students to develop a strong foundation in life and social sciences and how they connect to other disciplines. The Associate in Arts in Human Development Studies prepares students for a baccalaureate major in Human Development, Sociology, Psychology, or Anthropology. By fulfilling many of the lower division major requirements at the CSU and UC campuses, this program will enhance student awareness in ecological, historical, political, social, service/community learning issues as well as facilitate successful student transfer. The goal is also to excite, ignite, and inspire students to learn and serve their respective communities. Requirements for Associate in Arts Degree: a) Complete Major Field courses with a grade of C or better. b) Complete a minimum of twenty units selected from the four areas below. c) Complete Ohlone College General Education (Plan A), CSU GE (Plan B), or IGETC (Plan C) requirements. These requirements are specified in the Ohlone College catalog. Students who do not intend to transfer may complete Ohlone College General Education; students who intend to transfer may complete either CSU GE or IGETC.
    [Show full text]