DOCSLIB.ORG

“Habitable Extrasolar Planetary Systems, the Case of 55 Cnc”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Habitable Extrasolar Planetary Systems, the Case of 55 Cnc” “HABITABLE EXTRASOLAR PLANETARY SYSTEMS, THE CASE OF 55 CNC” Desiree Cotto-Figueroa University of Puerto Rico at Humacao Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii Mentor : Nader Haghighipour ABSTRACT The results of a study of the orbital evolution and habitability of the ρ Cnc system are presented. Initial integration of the system using the reported orbital parameters (McArthur et. al 2004) indicates that the system is unstable. In search of the stable planetary orbits, an extensive search of the parameter-space of the system was carried out and a stable region was identified. Within this region, dynamical stability of an Earth- like planet in the habitable zone of the system was studied and two regions of harboring habitable planets were recognized. INTRODUCTION: The notion of planetary worlds orbiting stars other than our Sun is not new. History has revealed that human ponderings over the possibility of other solar systems beyond our own dates as far back as early Greek times, when the Greek philosopher Epicurus wrote: “There exist countless worlds like ours also as well as others.” It wasn’t until 1991 when radio signals from the pulsar PSR B1257+12 in the constellation Virgo led Alexander Wolszczan, an astronomer from Pennstate University to discover the first planets ever known outside our solar system. Later, in the following year, using radial velocity measurements, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz from the University of Geneva announced the discovery of the first extrasolar planet around a main sequence star (51 Pegasi) (Mayor & Queloz ,1995). Two years later, at the Lick Observatory, Geoffrey Marcy and Paul Butler confirmed the existence of that planet using the Hamilton Spectrograph (Marcy et al. 1997). Since then more than 160 planets have been detected. Considering the vastness of the universe, containing in all probability millions of planets, it is difficult to imagine that our solar system is unique and our planet is the only one that harbors life. In fact, discovery of multiple planets around a star is not unexpected. Among the currently known extrasolar planetary systems, there are over 14 systems with more than one planet. The planetary system of ρ Cancri (55Cnc) is one of such systems. This project has to do with exploring the possibility of habitable worlds in the ρ Cancri system. The single most crucial factor in the evolution of life is the availability of liquid water. In our solar system, the habitable zone (HZ) lies approximately between 0.8 to 1.3 AU where water can sustain its liquid form. In a extrasolar multiple planet system, one Table 1. Element ρ Cnc e ρ Cnc b ρ Cnc c ρ Cnc d Orbital Period 2.808 ± 0.002 14.67±0.01 43.93±0.25 4517.4±77.8 (days) Eccentricity 0.174±0.127 0.0197±0.012 0.44±0.08 0.327±0.28 ω (°) 261.65±41.14 131.49±33.27 244.39±10.65 234.73±6.74 a (AU) 0.038±0.001 0.115±0.003 0.240±0.008 5.257±0.208 M (MJUP) 0.056±0.017 0.982±0.19 0.272±0.07 4.9±1.1 Velocity 6.665±0.81 67.365±0.82 12.946±0.86 49.786±1.53 Amplitude (ms-1) major question, would then be; Can the system support a habitable planet? The HZ of a main-sequence star is defined as where liquid water can exist on the surface of a planet. This implies a moderate planetary surface temperature suitable for the development and subsistence of life. The size and location of the HZ depend on the physical properties of the star in question. ρ Cancri (55 Cnc) is a visual binary system in the constellation of Cancer. It consists of a middle-aged, Sun-like (G8V) primary of high metallicity (Rho A) and a red dwarf companion mass (Rho B). A mean distance of approximately 1,150 AU separates these two stars. Four planets, Ab, Ac, Ad, and Ae, have been discovered in orbits around the primary star. Table 1 shows the orbital parameters of these objects. This is the largest number of planets currently known to exist around a star other than our Sun. Ab was announced as the fourth extrasolar planet discovered (Butler et al. 1997) and apparently also was listed as the second "Hot Jupiter" found after 51 Pegasi b. In 2002, the second planet Ad, a high-mass classical jovian, was discovered (Marcy et al. 2002). When signals of the first two planets were removed from the radial velocity measurements of ρ Cancri, a sharp peak remained indicating the possibility of a lower mass planet with a period of 44 days. Despite the similarity between the planet’s period and the period of the rotation of the star (35-42 days), the third planet Ac, was tentatively added to the list of extrasolar planets. Since ρ Cancri is a quiet star, showing no signs of photospheric irregularities, the planet interpretation is more likely viable. Analysis of the dynamics of this planet indicates that it orbits bring it very close to Ab, resulting in a near 3:1 resonance. The most recent planet discovered in the ρ Cnc system, Ae, is a "Neptune-class" extrasolar planet (McArthur et al. 2004). The discovery of this planet confirmed the existence of Ac as well. Ac shows an amplitude of the signal of 12 m s-1 when the effects produced by stellar activity normally do not exceed 3 ms-1. Having the largest number of planets and an outer planet that orbits at 5.3 AU which is comparable to Jupiter’s distance from our Sun, ρ Cancri becomes one of the most interesting systems for investigating the following question: Could a planet harbors life in this system? METHOD The goal of this project is to identify regions within the habitable zone of ρ Cancri where a life-harboring planet can have a long-term stable orbit. The habitable zone of the system is identified as the appropriate position for an Earth-like planet where it would receive the same amount of radiation as our Earth receives from our Sun. The amount of radiation emitted by a star depends on its luminosity, and varies with the radius and surface temperature of the star (Stefan-Boltzman law E=σT4). That is, L=4πr2b(r)= 4πR2σT4 Where L is the luminosity of the star, R is its radius, T is the star’s surface temperature, and b(r) represents the star’s brightness at a distance r. From this equation, the amount of radiation receive by a planet at a distance r relative to the radiation received by Earth from the sun is given by This equation indicates a habitable zone with an inner edge at 0.598 AU and an outer edge at 0.972 AU. Previous studies, however, reported different boundaries for this region (Table 2). In this paper, in order to be consistent with previous studies, we choose the habitable zone to have a range of 0.4 to 1.3 AU. Table 2 Reference Habitable Zone Menou & Tabachnick (2003) 1.00 ± 0.10 AU Rivera &Haghighipour (2003) 0.7 – 1.3 AU Bloh,Cuntz,Franck &Bounama (2003) 0.66 ± 0.02 – 1.14 ± 0.04 AU Whitmire et. al (1998) 0.95 – 1.15 AU The orbit of an Earth-like planet along with the orbits of the four planets of the system were integrated numerically using Mercury N-body integrator (Chambers 1999). The time step of integrations were set to 0.14 days, equivalent to 1/20 of the inner planet’s orbital period (2.808 days). We simulated the dynamics of ρ Cnc system with the orbital parameters reported by McArthur et al. (2004), and assumed coplanarity of the system. Using these orbital elements, our simulations indicated that the system was unstable. There was an ejection of Planet Ae from the system at 23,877 years. Figure 1 shows the semi-major axes of these planets. Searching the orbital parameters space of the system, we were able to identify a region of the parameter space where the system is stable. Figure 2 shows the semi-major axis of the planets of the system for one of such cases. As shown here the system is stable for 10 million years. Figure 1 Figure 2 Using the orbital parameters of the system of Figure 2 as our initial parameters, we simulated the dynamics of an Earth-like planet in the Habitable Zone of the system. The results are shown in Figure 3. An Earth-like planet with an initial semi-major axis of 0.4 AU was ejected at 4,579 years. Simulations testing the following three regions: 0.5 - 0.85 AU, 1 AU, and 1.13 - 1.3 AU, were unsuccessful: the Earth-like planet escaped the Habitable Zone in parts of it’s orbit. At 0.98 AU planet E was ejected at 4.4 Myr and at 1.03 AU planet E collided with the star at 6.8 Myr. Our studies have shown that in order for an Earth-like planet to survive in the ρ Cnc planetary system and remain habitable, it must reside within the ranges of : 0.9 - 0.95 AU or 1.05 - 1.1 AU. Figure 4 shows the semi-major axes of the four planets of the system and that of a hypothetical Earth-like planet for a stable and also an unstable configuration. 1.E+08 1.E+07 1.E+06 1.E+05 1.E+04 Time (yrs) 1.E+03 1.E+02 1.E+01 1.E+00 0.40 0.60 0.70 0.90 1.00 1.08 1.10 1.20 0.50 0.80 0.85 0.93 0.95 0.98 1.03 1.05 1.13 1.15 1.30 Initial Semi-major Axis (AU) Figure 3 (a) (b) Figure 4 Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lunar & Planetary Surface Power Management & Distribution
    NASA SBIR 2020 Phase I Solicitation Z1.05 Lunar & Planetary Surface Power Management & Distribution Lead Center: GRC Participating Center(s): GSFC, JSC Technology Area: TA3 Space Power and Energy Storage Scope Title Innovative ways to transmit high power for lunar & Mars surface missions Scope Description The Global Exploration Roadmap (January 2018) and the Space Policy Directive (December 2017) detail NASA’s plans for future human-rated space missions. A major factor in this involves establishing bases on the lunar surface and eventually Mars. Surface power for bases is envisioned to be located remotely from the habitat modules and must be efficiently transferred over significant distances. The International Space Station (ISS) has the highest power (100kW), and largest space power distribution system with eight interleaved micro-grids providing power functions similar to a terrestrial power utility. Planetary bases will be similar to the ISS with expectations of multiple power sources, storage, science, and habitation modules, but at higher power levels and with longer distribution networks providing interconnection. In order to enable high power (>100kW) and longer distribution systems on the surface of the moon or Mars, NASA is in need of innovative technologies in the areas of lower mass/higher efficiency power electronic regulators, switchgear, cabling, connectors, wireless sensors, power beaming, power scavenging, and power management control. The technologies of interest would need to operate in extreme temperature environments, including lunar night, and could experience temperature changes from -153C to 123C for lunar applications, and -125C to 80C for Mars bases. In addition to temperature extremes, technologies would need to withstand (have minimal degradation from) lunar dust/regolith, Mars dust storms, and space radiation levels.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Scientific Programme 10.1
    10. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME 10.1. OVERVIEW (a) Invited Discourses Plenary Hall B 18:00-19:30 ID1 “The Zoo of Galaxies” Karen Masters, University of Portsmouth, UK Monday, 20 August ID2 “Supernovae, the Accelerating Cosmos, and Dark Energy” Brian Schmidt, ANU, Australia Wednesday, 22 August ID3 “The Herschel View of Star Formation” Philippe André, CEA Saclay, France Wednesday, 29 August ID4 “Past, Present and Future of Chinese Astronomy” Cheng Fang, Nanjing University, China Nanjing Thursday, 30 August (b) Plenary Symposium Review Talks Plenary Hall B (B) 8:30-10:00 Or Rooms 309A+B (3) IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antarctica John Storey (3) Mon. 20 IAUS 289 The Cosmic Distance Scale: Past, Present and Future Wendy Freedman (3) Mon. 27 IAUS 290 Probing General Relativity using Accreting Black Holes Andy Fabian (B) Wed. 22 IAUS 291 Pulsars are Cool – seriously Scott Ransom (3) Thu. 23 Magnetars: neutron stars with magnetic storms Nanda Rea (3) Thu. 23 Probing Gravitation with Pulsars Michael Kremer (3) Thu. 23 IAUS 292 From Gas to Stars over Cosmic Time Mordacai-Mark Mac Low (B) Tue. 21 IAUS 293 The Kepler Mission: NASA’s ExoEarth Census Natalie Batalha (3) Tue. 28 IAUS 294 The Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Magnetism Bryan Gaensler (B) Wed. 29 IAUS 295 Black Holes in Galaxies John Kormendy (B) Thu. 30 (c) Symposia - Week 1 IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antartica IAUS 290 Accretion on all scales IAUS 291 Neutron Stars and Pulsars IAUS 292 Molecular gas, Dust, and Star Formation in Galaxies (d) Symposia –Week 2 IAUS 289 Advancing the Physics of Cosmic
    [Show full text]
  • Venus: Global Warming Gone Bad Earth & Venus: Sister Planets? Venus Earth
    Venus: Global warming gone bad Earth & Venus: Sister planets? Venus Earth Mass 5x1024 kg 6x1024 kg a (semi- 0.7 AU 1 AU major axis) What is T at surface ~750 K ~300 K the boiling Temp of water? P at surface ~90 atm ~1 atm atm N2 and H2O CO2 and composition clouds H2SO4 clouds How do we know Venus’s surface temperature? How do we know Venus’s surface temperature? high energy low energy short wavelength long wavelength “bluer” “redder” hot cold How do we know Venus’s surface temperature? the Sun emits light Earth emits light here. T=6000 K here. T=300 K Venus emits light here. T=750 How do we know what the clouds are made of? Spectrum of planet with no atmosphere Amountof light observed above the atmosphere Wavelength of light (in the infrared) How do we know what the clouds are made of? Spectrum of Spectrum of planet with no planet with atmosphere atmosphere Wavelength at which a molecule in the atmosphere absorbs light Amountof light observed above the atmosphere Amountof light observed above the atmosphere Wavelength of light (in the Wavelength of light (in the infrared) infrared) How do we know what the clouds are made of? (Infrared light) How did Venus get so hot? Remember - all gases absorb light at specific wavelengths. “Greenhouse” gases (like carbon dioxide, water and methane) like to absorb in the infrared wavelengths. Planets emit light at infrared wavelengths (same as human bodies). Conclusio n? “Greenhouse” gases don’t lett the heat from the planet escape.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Pluto Is Not a Planet Anymore Or How Astronomical Objects Get Named
    3 Why Pluto Is Not a Planet Anymore or How Astronomical Objects Get Named Sethanne Howard USNO retired Abstract Everywhere I go people ask me why Pluto was kicked out of the Solar System. Poor Pluto, 76 years a planet and then summarily dismissed. The answer is not too complicated. It starts with the question how are astronomical objects named or classified; asks who is responsible for this; and ends with international treaties. Ultimately we learn that it makes sense to demote Pluto. Catalogs and Names WHO IS RESPONSIBLE for naming and classifying astronomical objects? The answer varies slightly with the object, and history plays an important part. Let us start with the stars. Most of the bright stars visible to the naked eye were named centuries ago. They generally have kept their old- fashioned names. Betelgeuse is just such an example. It is the eighth brightest star in the northern sky. The star’s name is thought to be derived ,”Yad al-Jauzā' meaning “the Hand of al-Jauzā يد الجوزاء from the Arabic i.e., Orion, with mistransliteration into Medieval Latin leading to the first character y being misread as a b. Betelgeuse is its historical name. The star is also known by its Bayer designation − ∝ Orionis. A Bayeri designation is a stellar designation in which a specific star is identified by a Greek letter followed by the genitive form of its parent constellation’s Latin name. The original list of Bayer designations contained 1,564 stars. The Bayer designation typically assigns the letter alpha to the brightest star in the constellation and moves through the Greek alphabet, with each letter representing the next fainter star.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Geology: Goals, Future Directions, and Recommendations
    NASA Conference Publication 3005 Planetary Geology: Goals, Future Directions, and Recommendations Proceedings of a workshop held at Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona January 1987 NASA Conference Publication 3005 Planetary Geology: Goals, Future Directions, and Recommendations NASA Office of Space Science and Applications Washington, D. C. Proceedings of a workshop held at Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona January 1987 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Division Preface This report gives results of a workshop on planetary geology held in January, 1987, at Arizona State University at the request of Dr. David Scott, Discipline Scientist, Planetary Geology and Geophysics, NASA. In addition to reviews by the workshop members, it was reviewed by the Planetary Geology and Geophysics Working Group and incorporated comments from Dr. James Underwood, current Discipline Scientist for the program. R. Greeley, January 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................ 3 3.0 Workshop Conclusions ........................................................................... 5 3.1 Planetary geology studies are in transition from a descriptive phase to prcxess-oriented research .................................................. 5 3.2 Quantitative techniques can be applied to existing data. but there is a need for
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Craters on Titan: Finalizing Titan's Crater Population
    49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2018 (LPI Contrib. No. 2083) 2105.pdf IMPACT CRATERS ON TITAN: FINALIZING TITAN’S CRATER POPULATION. J. E. Hedgepeth1, C. D. Neish1, E. P. Turtle B. W. Stiles2 1University of Western Ontario Department of Earth Sciences, London, ON ([email protected]), 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. Introduction: Saturn’s moon Titan is one of the map craters as shapefiles. The craters are meticulously most dynamic bodies in the solar system. It is the only mapped across the surface. This map is compared to the moon with a thick atmosphere, and like Earth’s atmos- most up to date ISS mosaic, updating the crater map phere it has an active hydrological cycle. However, the where necessary. atmosphere of Titan is organic rich and rains methane This finalized catalog of craters on Titan is imported instead of water. As a result, Titan’s surface topography into MATLAB as shapefiles for further analysis. Initial is being modified extensively by many of the same types estimates of crater diameter and center positions are cat- of erosional processes seen on Earth. The methane rain aloged for further work. creates a complex system of river networks, and the Topographic Analysis: Our understanding of im- equatorial regions are covered by seas of organic sand pact cratering controls how we perceive surface changes dunes. on Earth and other worlds. Therefore, constraining cra- The extent of the endogenic and exogenic processes tering processes informs planetary surface evolution. A on Titan is best observed in its impact craters. Impact large catalog of unaltered craters exists on other icy cratering is a fundamental process in planetary geology; worlds that can be compared with those we see on Titan it is a well understood process because of how pervasive [5, 6].
    [Show full text]
  • Elisa: Astrophysics and Cosmology in the Millihertz Regime Contents
    Doing science with eLISA: Astrophysics and cosmology in the millihertz regime Pau Amaro-Seoane1; 13, Sofiane Aoudia1, Stanislav Babak1, Pierre Binétruy2, Emanuele Berti3; 4, Alejandro Bohé5, Chiara Caprini6, Monica Colpi7, Neil J. Cornish8, Karsten Danzmann1, Jean-François Dufaux2, Jonathan Gair9, Oliver Jennrich10, Philippe Jetzer11, Antoine Klein11; 8, Ryan N. Lang12, Alberto Lobo13, Tyson Littenberg14; 15, Sean T. McWilliams16, Gijs Nelemans17; 18; 19, Antoine Petiteau2; 1, Edward K. Porter2, Bernard F. Schutz1, Alberto Sesana1, Robin Stebbins20, Tim Sumner21, Michele Vallisneri22, Stefano Vitale23, Marta Volonteri24; 25, and Henry Ward26 1Max Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut), Germany 2APC, Univ. Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, CEA/Irfu, Obs. de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA 4Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA 5UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France 6Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA, IPhT, CNRS, URA 2306, F-91191Gif/Yvette Cedex, France 7University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, I-20100, Italy 8Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA 9Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK 10ESA, Keplerlaan 1, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands 11Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Zürich, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057 Zürich Switzerland
    [Show full text]
  • EART163 Planetary Surfaces
    EART163 Planetary Surfaces Francis Nimmo Course Overview • How did the planetary surfaces we see form and evolve? What processes are/were operating? • Techniques to answer these questions: – Images – Modelling/Quantitative analysis – Comparative analysis and analogues • Case studies – examples from this Solar System Course Outline • Week 1 – Introduction, planetary shapes • Week 2 – Strength and rheology • Week 3 – Tectonics • Week 4 – Volcanism and cryovolcanism • Week 5 – Midterm; Impacts • Week 6 – Impacts (cont’d) • Week 7 – Slopes and mass movement • Week 8 – Wind • Week 9 – Water & Ice • Week 10 – Ice cont’d; Recap; Final Recent spacecraft missions (2018-19) ESA landed on a comet (C-G) ~2m JAXA landed on an asteroid (Ryugu) ~10 km CNSA landed on the lunar farside NASA flew by a Kuiper Belt Object (MU69) Logistics • Website: http://www.es.ucsc.edu/~fnimmo/eart163 • Set text – Melosh, Planetary Surface Processes (2011) • Prerequisites – 160; some knowledge of calculus • Grading – based on weekly homeworks (~30%), midterm (~20%), final (~50%). • Homeworks due on Tuesdays • Location/Timing – TuTh 1:30-3:05pm D258 E&MS • Office hours –MoTh 3:05-4:05pm (A219 E&MS) or by appointment (email: [email protected]) • Questions/feedback? - Yes please! Expectations • Homework typically consists of 3 questions • Grad students will have one extra question (harder) • If it’s taking you more than 1 hour per question on average, you’ve got a problem – come and see me • Midterm/finals consist of short (compulsory) and long (pick from a list) questions • In both the midterm and the final you will receive a formula sheet • Showing up and asking questions are usually routes to a good grade • Plagiarism – see website for policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceres – VIS-IR Surface Composition Analysis: a Review in Advance of the AD WN Mission Daniela Henckel
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2015 Ceres – VIS-IR Surface Composition Analysis: A Review In Advance Of The AD WN Mission Daniela Henckel Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Henckel, Daniela, "Ceres – VIS-IR Surface Composition Analysis: A Review In Advance Of The AD WN Mission" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 1783. https://commons.und.edu/theses/1783 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CERES – VIS-IR SURFACE COMPOSITION ANALYSIS: A REVIEW IN ADVANCE OF THE DAWN MISSION by Daniela Henckel Bachelor of Science, University of Potsdam, 2010 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota May 2015 This thesis, submitted by Daniela Henckel in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science from the University of North Dakota, has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done and is hereby approved. Dr. Michael J. Gaffey Dr. Ron Fevig Dr. Santosh Seelan Dr. Gabriele Arnold This thesis is being submitted by the appointed advisory committee as having met all of the requirements of the School of Graduate Studies at the University of North Dakota and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Surface Instrument Workshop Report (1995)
    PLANETARY SURFACE INSTRUMENTS WORKSHOP Edited by Charles Meyer, Allan H. Treiman, and Theodor Kostiuk Held at Houston, Texas May 12–13, 1995 Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Institute Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Technical Report Number 95-05 LPI/TR--95-05 ii Planetary Surface Instruments Workshop Compiled in 1996 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as Meyer C., Treiman A. H., and Kostiuk T., eds. (1996) Planetary Surface Instruments Workshop. LPI Tech. Rpt. 95- 05, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 115 pp. This report is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling. Cover: MIMOS-II, a miniaturized Mössbauer instrument with two detector channels, developed for use in space missions with very limited power resources like the Small Stations of the Russian Mars ’96 Mission. LPI Technical Report 95-05 iii Introduction The next steps in the exploration of the solar system will include robotic missions to the surfaces of planets, moons, asteroids, and comets. For the greatest possible returns from these missions, their scientific rationales must be closely coordinated with development of appropriate instrumentation and with the constraints of mission and program planning.
    [Show full text]
  • 第 28 届国际天文学联合会大会 Programme Book
    IAU XXVIII GENERAL ASSEMBLY 20-31 AUGUST, 2012 第 28 届国际天文学联合会大会 PROGRAMME BOOK 1 Table of Contents Welcome to IAU Beijing General Assembly XXVIII ........................... 4 Welcome to Beijing, welcome to China! ................................................ 6 1.IAU EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, HOST ORGANISATIONS, PARTNERS, SPONSORS AND EXHIBITORS ................................ 8 1.1. IAU EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ..................................................................8 1.2. IAU SECRETARIAT .........................................................................................8 1.3. HOST ORGANISATIONS ................................................................................8 1.4. NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ........................................................9 1.5. NATIONAL ORGANISING COMMITTEE ..................................................9 1.6. LOCAL ORGANISING COMMITTEE .......................................................10 1.7. ORGANISATION SUPPORT ........................................................................ 11 1.8. PARTNERS, SPONSORS AND EXHIBITORS ........................................... 11 2.IAU XXVIII GENERAL ASSEMBLY INFORMATION ............... 14 2.1. LOCAL ORGANISING COMMITTEE OFFICE .......................................14 2.2. IAU SECRETARIAT .......................................................................................14 2.3. REGISTRATION DESK – OPENING HOURS ...........................................14 2.4. ON SITE REGISTRATION FEES AND PAYMENTS ................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Surface Processes
    Planetary Surface Processes Nathan Bridges Applied Physics Laboratory (and former JPLer and ongoing coworker with many at JPL and Caltech) rippled sand in Gale Crater MSL landing ellipse HiRISE image ESP_023957_1755 Properties of Bodies with Major Atmospheres Venus Earth Mars Titan Solar distance (AU) 0.72 1 1.7 10.1 Orbital period (d) 224 365 687 10,759 (Sun) 16 (Saturn) Rotation period ‐243 d 24 h 24h 37m 16 d Axial tilt (°) 177.4 23.4 25.2 0 Diameter (km) 12,104 12,742 6779 5152 Surface gravity (m s‐2) 8.9 9.8 3.7 1.4 Surface temperature (K) 737 184‐330 130‐308 94 Surface pressure (bars) 92 1 0.6 1.5 Typical surface basalt water; basalt water ice; composition silicates hydrocarbons (liquid, ices, tholins) Atmospheric composition 96.5% CO2 78.1% N2 96.0% CO2 95.0% N2 (lower troposphere) 3.5% N2 21.0% O2 1.9% Ar 4.9% CH4 0.9% Ar 1.9% N2 0.1% O2 0.1% CO Surface Processes of Bodies with Major Atmospheres Venus Earth Mars Titan Aeolian √√√√ Fluvial X √ minor √ Glacial/periglacial X √√ ? Impact √√√√ Mass wasting √√√√ Seasonal X √√ √ Tectonics √√√? Volcanism √√√√ Climate Change ? √ maybe ? Apology for these objects that are not covered I can’t talk about everything, nor do I know everything etc. Earth largely passed over because we know a lot more and it is not in scope with this talk Io and Enceladus are mentioned later for volcanics Dust and Dust Aggregates Comparison of Terrestrial and Martian Dust Transport and Size [Bridges and Muhs, 2012; Muhs and Bettis, 2003] Dust Lifting and Storms (mostly Earth and Mars) Known: The approximate mechanisms conditions, locations, and times of year when local, regional, and (in the case of Mars) global storms occur Unknown: Precise prediction of storms more than a few days in advance and location centers to a few km or less Solution: Rapid repeat data collection: ‐ images ‐ surface and atmospheric temp.
    [Show full text]