Oilfield Anisotropy: Its Origins and Electrical Characteristics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oilfield Anisotropy: Its Origins and Electrical Characteristics ANISOTROPY ANISOTROPY ANISOTROPY Oilfield Anisotropy: Its Origins and Electrical Characteristics Barbara Anderson Klaus Helbig Ian Bryant Consultant Martin Lüling Hannover, Germany Brian Spies Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA Getting a grip on anisotropy of the earth can mean the difference between success and failure in reservoir evaluation and development. Accounting for the affects of anisotropy in measurements of the earth begins with understanding the geologic foundations of anisotropy—how sediments are laid down, converted to rock and deformed. Here is a summary of some geologic mechanisms for anisotropy, and some recent progress on anisotropy of electrical properties of rock formations. Across the many disciplines of the oil field, a power now allow anisotropy to be factored stock exchange. A smart one will figure out nearly universal phenomenon is anisotropy into field development decisions. A full how to survive, but not without a struggle. —the variation of a property with the direction mathematical description of anisotropy Physicists first met this challenge early in in which it is measured. Where anisotropy remains difficult—for example, representing this century when they left the laboratory to arises, convenient assumptions fall. Seismic flow in three dimensions requires six vari- make measurements of the earth’s subsur- reflectors appear at the wrong depth. Seismic ables.1 But accounting for the simplest face. They brought with them the mathe- lines don’t tie. Waterflood programs fail. effects of anisotropy is coming within reach. matics of materials assumed to be Induction logs are misinterpreted and mis- What is meant by anisotropy depends on isotropic—having properties with the same take water for pay. who is talking. Geophysicists generally focus value in all directions—and homogeneous. As producers seek a finer comb to draw on variation of seismic wavefront velocity or For the most part, the convenient assump- through measurements of the earth, they are on the polarization of shear waves. Petro- tions held remarkably well. Where the changing the status of anisotropy from physicists may measure resistivity anisotropy. assumptions began to fail, there arose the unwelcome guest to hard-working collabo- Drillers and geologists may think first of second difficulty with anisotropy—if you rator. Advances in theory and computing anisotropy in rock strength or stiffness pro- don’t have the tools to deal with anisotropy, duced by earth stresses. Stratigraphers may the temptation is to ignore it or sweep it concentrate on anisotropy of magnetic prop- under the rug. For help in preparation of this article, thanks to David Allen, Schlumberger Wireline & Testing, Sugar Land, erties. And reservoir engineers need go to Assumptions about isotropy began to Texas, USA; Bülent Baygün, Bob Burridge, Darwin Ellis, great lengths to characterize permeability crack as early as the 1930s, when measure- Charlie Flaum, David Johnson, Bob Kleinberg, Stefan anisotropy to plan an optimal production ments made with electrodes laid in different Luthi, Bill Murphy, TS Ramakrishnan and Lisa Stewart, Schlumberger-Doll Research, Ridgefield, Connecticut, strategy (see “Case Study: Anisotropy for directions on the earth’s surface were seen to USA; Stuart Crampin, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Steering Horizontal Wells,” page 50). give different results when strata were dip- Scotland; Gregor Eberli, University of Miami, Miami, In all geoscience disciplines, however, ping than when strata were flat.2 In geo- Florida, USA; Stan Gianzero, Consultant, Austin, Texas; Roy Nurmi, Schlumberger Wireline & Testing, Dubai, there are two difficulties in dealing with physics, the introduction of shear wave UAE; Jon Roestenburg, Schlumberger Wireline & Testing, anisotropy. One is that the conceptual sources in mid-1970s showed that shear Jakarta, Indonesia; Mike Schoenberg, Schlumberger Cambridge Research, Cambridge, England; Frank Shray, underpinnings of anisotropy originate from wave anisotropy was often significant and Schlumberger Wireline & Testing, Stavanger, Norway; the laboratory study of crystals—pure, could be analyzed quantitatively (next Julian Singer, ONGC-Schlumberger Wireline Research homogeneous materials under pristine, con- page).3 A leap, however, took place in the Centre, New Delhi, India; Sven Treitel, Amoco Production Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA; Don Winterstein, trolled conditions. Today’s physical models mid-1980s, when sensors again reclined Chevron Petroleum Technology Company, La Habra, of the earth draw much from this work, with the expansion of horizontal drilling. In California, USA; Mark Zoback, Stanford University, even though the earth is a composite, het- vertical wells, electrical anisotropy was often Stanford, California. erogeneous material sampled under any- In this article, CDR (Compensated Dual Resistivity) and thing but pristine, controlled conditions. RST (Reservoir Satuation Tool) are marks of Schlumberger. Applying the physics of pure materials to the earth is like putting an economics pro- fessor to work on the floor of the Tokyo 48 Oilfield Review W E ° E Fractures, N 45 Slow shear, S 45 ° E ° E Fast shear, N 45 observed to be negligible and could be nHow fractures split shear waves. the vertical direction. This is called trans- ignored. With horizontal boreholes, acoustic A notable feature of acoustic anisotropy is verse isotropy in the vertical direction and and electrical anisotropy became obvious shear wave splitting, or polarization, typi- derives from the early days of logging, when cally caused by fractures. If a shear wave 4 and demanded consideration. For many, of a polarization is not parallel to the strike anisotropy was observed in vertical wells at the simple, isotropic days were ending and a of a fracture set, the wave will be split into 90° (transverse) to uniform (isotropic) flat- new way of thinking was required. two components as it passes through the lying beds.5 Resistivity, for example, would This article gives an overview of the geo- fractures. The first, faster component will appear to be the same for any wellbore logic basis of anisotropy as it is understood have particle motion aligned parallel to azimuth, but be different from the value in the fracture strike. A second, slower com- today in the oil field. It begins with a review ponent will have a wavefront aligned per- the vertical direction. of basic concepts and geologic mechanisms pendicular to the fracture strike. A growing usage today, especially among that produce various types of anisotropy and [From Lynn HB: “Seismic Detection of Oriented geophysicists, is to qualify isotropy with then focuses on recent advances in the mea- Fractures,” Oil & Gas Journal 84, no. 31 (August 4, respect to an axis of symmetry. Transverse 1986): 54-55. See also Crampin S: “Evaluation of surement and interpretation of electrical Anisotropy by Shear-Wave Splitting,” Geophysics isotropy in a vertical well that crosses hori- anisotropies. Two crucial and well-charac- 50 (January 1985): 142-152; Crampin S: zontal beds would be transverse isotropy terized anisotropies—acoustic/seismic and “Anisotropy and Transverse Isotropy,” Geophysi- with a vertical axis of symmetry, abbreviated permeability—are detailed in other articles cal Prospecting 34 (February 1986): 94-99.] TIV. Properties measured in a horizontal in this issue (see pages 24 and 36). well that crosses a series of vertical fractures What is Anisotropy? 1. Each variable here is a scalar, a quantity that has mag- Crampin S, Bush I, Naville C and Taylor DB: “Estimat- A material is anisotropic if the value of a nitude but no direction. For an introduction to the ing the Internal Structure of Reservoirs with Shear- vector measurement of a rock property analysis of anisotropy: Lake LW: “The Origins of Wave VSPs,” Geophysics: The Leading Edge 5, no. 11 Anisotropy,” paper SPE 17652, Journal of Petroleum (1986): 35-39. varies with direction. Anisotropy is typically Technology 40 (April 1988): 395-396. Alford RM: “Shear Data in the Presence of Azimuthal used to describe physical properties, which, 2. Maillet R and Doll HG: “Sur un Théorème Relatif aux Anisotropy,” Expanded Abstracts, 56th SEG Annual for the purposes of geoscience, can be Milieux Electriquement Anisotropes et ses Applica- International Meeting and Exposition, Dallas, Texas, tions à la Prospection Electrique en Courant Continu,” USA (November 2-6, 1986): 476-479. thought of as parameters intrinsic to the Ergänzungshefte für angewandte Geophysik 3 (1932): 4. For acoustic anisotropy due to layering in deviated body of the rock at a given state. The 109-124. and horizontal wells: White J: “Recent North Sea notable exception is that anisotropy is often For a review of resistivity anisotropy: “Formation Experience in Formation Evaluation of Horizontal Anisotropy: Reckoning With its Effects,” Oilfield Wells,” paper SPE 23114, presented at the SPE Off- used to describe a state of stress, which is Review 2, no. 1 (January 1990): 16-23. shore Europe Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland, not a property but a condition that results in 3. Crampin S, Evans R, Üçer B, Doyle M, Davis JP, September 3-6, 1991. anisotropy of intrinsic physical properties. Yegorkina GV and Miller A: “Observations of Dila- For a discussion of electrical anisotropy, see refer- In the simplest form of earth anisotropy, a tancy-induced Polarization Anomalies and Earthquake ences 27-36. Prediction,” Nature 286 (August 1980): 874-877. 5. Maillet and Doll, reference 2. vector measurement has constant magni- A shear wave is like the wave that travels down a tude in any horizontal direction that is dif- jump rope that is attached to a tree at one end and at ferent from the magnitude of the vector in the loose end, given a shake either side to side or up and down. Particle motion in a shear wave is perpen- dicular to the direction of wave propagation. October 1994 49 Homogeneous Heterogeneous a a a a might have transverse isotropy with a hori- a a a a a a a a a a zontal axis of symmetry, called TIH (see a a a a aaa a a aa a a a page 37). The nomenclature clings to isotropy as the frame of reference, since it aa a aa a aaa a a aaa a a remains far easier to model than anisotropy.
Recommended publications
  • 2.1.5 Stress-Strain Relation for Anisotropic Materials
    ,/... + -:\ 2.1.5Stress-strain Relation for AnisotropicMaterials The generalizedHook's law relatingthe stressesto strainscan be writtenin the form U2, 13,30-32]: o,=C,,€, (i,i =1,2,.........,6) Where: o, - Stress('ompttnents C,, - Elasticity matrix e,-Straincomponents The material properties (elasticity matrix, Cr) has thirty-six constants,stress-strain relations in the materialcoordinates are: [30] O1 LI CT6 a, l O2 03_ a, -t ....(2-6) T23 1/ )1 T32 1/1l 'Vt) Tt2 C16 c66 I The relations in equation (3-6) are referred to as characterizing anisotropicmaterials since there are no planes of symmetry for the materialproperties. An alternativename for suchanisotropic material is a triclinic material. If there is one plane of material property symmetry,the stress- strainrelations reduce to: -'+1-/ ) o1 c| ct2 ct3 0 0 crc €l o2 c12 c22 c23 0 0 c26 a: ct3 C23 ci3 0 0 c36 o-\ o3 ....(2-7) 723 000cqqc450 y)1 T3l 000c4sc5s0 Y3l T1a ct6 c26 c36 0 0 c66 1/t) Where the plane of symmetryis z:0. Such a material is termed monoclinicwhich containstfirfen independentelastic constants. If there are two brthogonalplanes of material property symmetry for a material,symmetry will existrelative to a third mutuallyorthogonal plane. The stress-strainrelations in coordinatesaligned with principal material directionswhich are parallel to the intersectionsof the three orthogonalplanes of materialsymmetry, are'. Ol ctl ct2ctl000 tl O2 Ct2 c22c23000 a./ o3 ct3 c23c33000 * o-\ ....(2-8) T23 0 00c4400 y)1 yll 731 0 000css0 712 0 0000cr'e 1/1) 'lt"' -' , :t i' ,/ Suchmaterial is calledorthotropic material.,There is no interaction betweennormal StreSSeS ot r 02, 03) andanisotropic materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2
    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture II Polarization Anisotropy Spectrum
    Lecture II Polarization Anisotropy Spectrum Wayne Hu Crete, July 2008 Damping Tail Dissipation / Diffusion Damping • Imperfections in the coupled fluid → mean free path λC in the baryons • Random walk over diffusion scale: geometric mean of mfp & horizon λD ~ λC√N ~ √λCη >> λC • Overtake wavelength: λD ~ λ ; second order in λC/λ • Viscous damping for R<1; heat conduction damping for R>1 1.0 N=η / λC Power λD ~ λC√N 0.1 perfect fluid instant decoupling λ 500 1000 1500 Silk (1968); Hu & Sugiyama (1995); Hu & White (1996) l Dissipation / Diffusion Damping • Rapid increase at recombination as mfp ↑ • Independent of (robust to changes in) perturbation spectrum • Robust physical scale for angular diameter distance test (ΩK, ΩΛ) Recombination 1.0 Power 0.1 perfect fluid instant decoupling recombination 500 1000 1500 Silk (1968); Hu & Sugiyama (1995); Hu & White (1996) l Damping • Tight coupling equations assume a perfect fluid: no viscosity, no heat conduction • Fluid imperfections are related to the mean free path of the photons in the baryons −1 λC = τ_ where τ_ = neσT a is the conformal opacity to Thomson scattering • Dissipation is related to the diffusion length: random walk approximation p p p λD = NλC = η=λC λC = ηλC the geometric mean between the horizon and mean free path • λD/η∗ ∼ few %, so expect the peaks :> 3 to be affected by dissipation Equations of Motion • Continuity k Θ_ = − v − Φ_ ; δ_ = −kv − 3Φ_ 3 γ b b where the photon equation remains unchanged and the baryons follow number conservation with ρb = mbnb • Euler k v_ = k(Θ + Ψ) − π − τ_(v − v ) γ 6 γ γ b a_ v_ = − v + kΨ +τ _(v − v )=R b a b γ b where the photons gain an anisotropic stress term πγ from radiation viscosity and a momentum exchange term with the baryons and are compensated by the opposite term in the baryon Euler equation Viscosity • Viscosity is generated from radiation streaming from hot to cold regions • Expect k π ∼ v γ γ τ_ generated by streaming, suppressed by scattering in a wavelength of the fluctuation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Microwave Background
    1 29. Cosmic Microwave Background 29. Cosmic Microwave Background Revised August 2019 by D. Scott (U. of British Columbia) and G.F. Smoot (HKUST; Paris U.; UC Berkeley; LBNL). 29.1 Introduction The energy content in electromagnetic radiation from beyond our Galaxy is dominated by the cosmic microwave background (CMB), discovered in 1965 [1]. The spectrum of the CMB is well described by a blackbody function with T = 2.7255 K. This spectral form is a main supporting pillar of the hot Big Bang model for the Universe. The lack of any observed deviations from a 7 blackbody spectrum constrains physical processes over cosmic history at redshifts z ∼< 10 (see earlier versions of this review). Currently the key CMB observable is the angular variation in temperature (or intensity) corre- lations, and to a growing extent polarization [2–4]. Since the first detection of these anisotropies by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite [5], there has been intense activity to map the sky at increasing levels of sensitivity and angular resolution by ground-based and balloon-borne measurements. These were joined in 2003 by the first results from NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)[6], which were improved upon by analyses of data added every 2 years, culminating in the 9-year results [7]. In 2013 we had the first results [8] from the third generation CMB satellite, ESA’s Planck mission [9,10], which were enhanced by results from the 2015 Planck data release [11, 12], and then the final 2018 Planck data release [13, 14]. Additionally, CMB an- isotropies have been extended to smaller angular scales by ground-based experiments, particularly the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) [15] and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) [16].
    [Show full text]
  • Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy∗
    Physics of the cosmic microwave background anisotropy∗ Martin Bucher Laboratoire APC, Universit´eParis 7/CNRS B^atiment Condorcet, Case 7020 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France [email protected] and Astrophysics and Cosmology Research Unit School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science University of KwaZulu-Natal Durban 4041, South Africa January 20, 2015 Abstract Observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), especially of its frequency spectrum and its anisotropies, both in temperature and in polarization, have played a key role in the development of modern cosmology and our understanding of the very early universe. We review the underlying physics of the CMB and how the primordial temperature and polarization anisotropies were imprinted. Possibilities for distinguish- ing competing cosmological models are emphasized. The current status of CMB ex- periments and experimental techniques with an emphasis toward future observations, particularly in polarization, is reviewed. The physics of foreground emissions, especially of polarized dust, is discussed in detail, since this area is likely to become crucial for measurements of the B modes of the CMB polarization at ever greater sensitivity. arXiv:1501.04288v1 [astro-ph.CO] 18 Jan 2015 1This article is to be published also in the book \One Hundred Years of General Relativity: From Genesis and Empirical Foundations to Gravitational Waves, Cosmology and Quantum Gravity," edited by Wei-Tou Ni (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015) as well as in Int. J. Mod. Phys. D (in press).
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Materials Engineering Terminology
    Glossary of Materials Engineering Terminology Adapted from: Callister, W. D.; Rethwisch, D. G. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 8th ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2010. McCrum, N. G.; Buckley, C. P.; Bucknall, C. B. Principles of Polymer Engineering, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 1997. Brittle fracture: fracture that occurs by rapid crack formation and propagation through the material, without any appreciable deformation prior to failure. Crazing: a common response of plastics to an applied load, typically involving the formation of an opaque banded region within transparent plastic; at the microscale, the craze region is a collection of nanoscale, stress-induced voids and load-bearing fibrils within the material’s structure; craze regions commonly occur at or near a propagating crack in the material. Ductile fracture: a mode of material failure that is accompanied by extensive permanent deformation of the material. Ductility: a measure of a material’s ability to undergo appreciable permanent deformation before fracture; ductile materials (including many metals and plastics) typically display a greater amount of strain or total elongation before fracture compared to non-ductile materials (such as most ceramics). Elastic modulus: a measure of a material’s stiffness; quantified as a ratio of stress to strain prior to the yield point and reported in units of Pascals (Pa); for a material deformed in tension, this is referred to as a Young’s modulus. Engineering strain: the change in gauge length of a specimen in the direction of the applied load divided by its original gauge length; strain is typically unit-less and frequently reported as a percentage.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Measurements of Silicon Carbide Ceramic Matrix Composites
    INL/EXT-12-27032 Advanced Measurements of Silicon Carbide Ceramic Matrix Composites David Hurley Farhad Fazbod Zilong Hua Stephen Reese Marat Khafizov August 2012 The INL is a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. INL/EXT-12-27032 Advanced Measurements of Silicon Carbide Ceramic Matrix Composites David Hurley Farhad Farzbod Zilong Hua Stephen Reese Marat Khafizov August, 2012 Idaho National Laboratory Materials Science and Engineering Department Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 http://www.inl.gov Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 ii iii ABSTRACT Silicon carbide (SiC) is being considered as a fuel cladding material for accident tolerant fuel under the Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program sponsored by the Nuclear Energy Division of the Department of Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Anisotropic Complex Refractive Indices of Atomically Thin Materials: Determination of the Optical Constants of Few-Layer Black Phosphorus
    materials Article Anisotropic Complex Refractive Indices of Atomically Thin Materials: Determination of the Optical Constants of Few-Layer Black Phosphorus Aaron M. Ross 1, Giuseppe M. Paternò 2 , Stefano Dal Conte 1, Francesco Scotognella 1,2,* and Eugenio Cinquanta 3 1 Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (A.M.R.); [email protected] (S.D.C.) 2 Center for Nano Science and Technology@PoliMi, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Via Giovanni Pascoli, 70/3, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] 3 Istituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-2399-6056 Received: 5 November 2020; Accepted: 14 December 2020; Published: 16 December 2020 Abstract: In this work, studies of the optical constants of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides and few-layer black phosphorus are briefly reviewed, with particular emphasis on the complex dielectric function and refractive index. Specifically, an estimate of the complex index of refraction of phosphorene and few-layer black phosphorus is given. The complex index of refraction of this material was extracted from differential reflectance data reported in the literature by employing a constrained Kramers–Kronig analysis combined with the transfer matrix method. The reflectance contrast of 1–3 layers of black phosphorus on a silicon dioxide/silicon substrate was then calculated using the extracted complex indices of refraction. Keywords: transition metal dichalcogenides; black phosphorus; two-dimensional materials; complex refractive index; Kramers–Kronig analysis 1. Introduction Two-dimensional materials emerged as a promising option for the development of nanoelectronic and optoelectronic devices, due to their peculiar electronic and optical properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuning Structural and Magnetic Properties of Fe Oxide Nanoparticles by Specifc Hydrogenation Treatments S
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Tuning structural and magnetic properties of Fe oxide nanoparticles by specifc hydrogenation treatments S. G. Greculeasa1, P. Palade1, G. Schinteie1, A. Leca1, F. Dumitrache2, I. Lungu2, G. Prodan3, A. Kuncser1 & V. Kuncser1* Structural and magnetic properties of Fe oxide nanoparticles prepared by laser pyrolysis and annealed in high pressure hydrogen atmosphere were investigated. The annealing treatments were performed at 200 °C (sample A200C) and 300 °C (sample A300C). The as prepared sample, A, consists of nanoparticles with ~ 4 nm mean particle size and contains C (~ 11 at.%), Fe and O. The Fe/O ratio is between γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 stoichiometric ratios. A change in the oxidation state, crystallinity and particle size is evidenced for the nanoparticles in sample A200C. The Fe oxide nanoparticles are completely reduced in sample A300C to α-Fe single phase. The blocking temperature increases from 106 K in A to 110 K in A200C and above room temperature in A300C, where strong inter-particle interactions are evidenced. Magnetic parameters, of interest for applications, have been considerably varied by the specifc hydrogenation treatments, in direct connection to the induced specifc changes of particle size, crystallinity and phase composition. For the A and A200C samples, a feld cooling dependent unidirectional anisotropy was observed especially at low temperatures, supporting the presence of nanoparticles with core–shell-like structures. Surprisingly high MS values, almost 50% higher than for bulk metallic Fe, were evidenced in sample A300C. Fe-based nanoparticles (NPs) show remarkable interest in the scientifc community for various applications such as biomedicine (hyperthermia1, targeted drug delivery2, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents3,4), catalysis5,6, magnetic fuids7, gas sensors8, high-density magnetic storages 9, water treatment and environment protection 10,11.
    [Show full text]
  • Anisotropy and Stress Distribution in Sand
    121 PROC. OF JSCE, No. 212, APRIL, 1973 ANISOTROPY AND STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN SAND By Nobuchika MOROTO* ation of the stress in sand from that in the ideal SYNOPSIS elastic media has been explained by pointing out the following main reasons, (1) the sand adjacent Sand has both inherent and induced anisotropy. to the loaded area at the surface tends to yield The former is produced by sedimentation and even by low stress, (2) the rigidity of sand in- the latter occurs in shear. Degree of the an- creases with depth. The author considers, how- isotropy is evaluated by means of the deforma- ever, the anisotropies of sand may also contribute tion modulus ratio n = Ex/Ez , and the case n <1 to the measured stresses and displacement in is treated. sand. Barden (1963) has made a short remark Deriving the solutions of stress and displace- on an effect of anisotropy on the behaviour of ment in a cross-anisotropic soil, effect of n on sand mass. the stress and surface settlement in sand is ex- Nonlinearity and anisotropy in the behaviour amined. The results show that the stress and of sand are evident. Hasegawa and Sawada (1971) surface settlement tend to increase near the load show, in their paper of stress solutions in non- in case of n<1. This stress increase in plane linear and heterogeneous elastic half space, that strain case is smaller than that in axial sym- problem of material nonlinearity can be treated metry. It can be known that the author's stress as a kind of problem where rigidity varies with solution is not coincidence with Wolf's.
    [Show full text]
  • CMB Temperature and Polarization Anisotropy Fundamentals
    CMB Temperature and Polarization Anisotropy Fundamentals Wayne Hu Center for Cosmological Physics and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago IL 60637 Abstract. The tremendous experimental progress in cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and polarization anisotropy studies over the last few years has helped establish a standard paradigm for cosmology at intermediate epochs and has simultaneously raised questions regarding the physical processes at the two opposite ends of time.What is the physics behind the source of structure in the universe and the dark energy that is currently accelerating its expansion? We review the acoustic phenomenology that forms the cornerstone of the standard cosmological model and discuss internal consistency relations which lend credence to its interpretation. We discuss future milestones in the study of CMB anisotropy that have implications for inflationary and dark energy models.These include signatures of gravitational waves and gravitational lensing in the polarization fields and secondary temperature anisotropy from the transit of CMB photons across the large-scale structure of the universe. 1. INTRODUCTION The pace of discovery in the field of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy has been accelerating over the last few years. With it,the basic elements of the cosmological model have been falling into place: the nature of the initial seed fluctuations that through gravitational instability generated all of the structure in the universe,and the mixture of matter-energy constituents that drives its expansion. Since even reviews written a scant year ago (e.g. [1,2,3]) seem out of date today,we will focus mainly on the fundamental physical elements that enter into cosmic microwave background observables.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Characterization of Ceramic Matrix Composites Through Uniaxial Monotonic Tensile Testing
    Dissertations and Theses 12-2016 Performance Characterization of Ceramic Matrix Composites through Uniaxial Monotonic Tensile Testing Jóhannes Pétursson Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Pétursson, Jóhannes, "Performance Characterization of Ceramic Matrix Composites through Uniaxial Monotonic Tensile Testing" (2016). Dissertations and Theses. 310. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/310 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERIZATION OF CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES THROUGH UNIAXIAL MONOTONIC TENSILE TESTING A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University by J´ohannesP´etursson In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering December 2016 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have always said that engineering is a team sport. Even in the process of com- pleting my individual thesis, there have been many people along the way on whom I have relied for moral, technical, and logistical support, and I give my thanks: Dr. Luis Gonzalez for his direction and patience as my thesis advisor, and for getting our technical paper accepted into the 2015 CMCEE ceramics conference in Vancouver, BC. Dr. Daewon Kim for allowing me use of his tensile machine and DAQ devices, and for serving on my advisory board. Dr. Virginie Rollin for teaching me the foundations of failure analysis, and for serving on my advisory board.
    [Show full text]