Romania-Report-December-2009.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Romania-Report-December-2009.Pdf Lo Tishkach Foundation European Jewish Cemeteries Initiative Avenue Louise 112, 2nd Floor | B-1050 Brussels | Belgium Telephone: +32 (0) 2 649 11 08 | Fax: +32 (0) 2 640 80 84 E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.lo-tishkach.org The Lo Tishkach European Jewish Cemeteries Initiative was established in 2006 as a joint project of the Conference of European Rabbis and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany. It aims to guarantee the effective and lasting preservation and protection of Jewish cemeteries and mass graves throughout the European continent. Identified by the Hebrew phrase Lo Tishkach (‘do not forget’), the Foundation is establishing a comprehensive publicly-accessible database of all Jewish burial grounds in Europe, currently featuring details on over 10,000 Jewish cemeteries and mass graves. Lo Tishkach is also producing a compendium of the different national and international laws and practices affecting these sites, to be used as a starting point to advocate for the better protection and preservation of Europe’s Jewish heritage. A key aim of the project is to engage young Europeans, bringing Europe’s history alive, encouraging reflection on the values that are important for responsible citizenship and mutual respect, giving a valuable insight into Jewish culture and mobilising young people to care for our common heritage. Lo Tishkach Foundation 2009 Page 1 Preliminary Report on Legislation & Practice Relating to the Protection and Preservation of Jewish Burial Grounds Romania Prepared by Andreas Becker for the Lo Tishkach Foundation in November and December 2009 with the support of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany & the Conference of European Rabbis. Not to be cited, circulated or reproduced without the permission of the Lo Tishkach Foundation. Lo Tishkach Foundation 2009 Page 2 CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………4 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………...5 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….6 1.1 Project Introduction ..………………………………………………………………………6 1.2 Report Objectives..…………………………………………………………………………6 2. Jewish Burial Grounds: An Overview…………………………………………………….8 3. Background on Jewish Burial Grounds in Romania…………………………………....9 3.1 Historical Background……………………………………………………………………... 9 3.2 Numbers & Documentation……………………………………………………………….10 3.3 Ownership & Maintenance……………………………………………………………….. 11 3.4 Current State……………………………………………………………………………. 12 3.5 Main Threats……………………………………………………………………………13 4. Legal Instruments……………………………………………………………………….14 4.1 Romanian Legislation…………………………………………………………………….14 4.2 Bilateral Agreements...……………………………………………………………………15 4.3 International and European Conventions……………………………………………………15 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………17 Appendix 1 – Map of Romania………………………………………………………………19 Appendix 2 – List of Known Jewish Burial Grounds in Romania…………………………20 Lo Tishkach Foundation 2009 Page 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This preliminary report was written with the assistance of a number of experts. The Lo Tishkach Foundation thanks Lucia Apostol and Rudy Marcovici of the Programme for the Rehabilitation of the Patrimony of the Federation of Jewish Communities in Romania for sharing their unique knowledge about the situation for Jewish burial grounds in their country, as well as for providing documentation for the purposes of this report. The Lo Tishkach Foundation further thanks Aurel Vainer, Paul Schwartz and Albert Kupferberg respectively President, Vice-President and General Secretary of the Federation, for giving insight into the issue of Jewish cemeteries and mass graves in Romania. Special thanks also goes to the Romanian Ministry of Culture and Religious Affairs, in particular Mircea Angelescu, Director General of National Cultural Heritage, Stefan Ioniţă, Director General for Religious Affairs and Adriana Popp, European Affairs Counsellor, who kindly gave of their time to discuss cultural heritage issues as they relate to Jewish heritage in Romania. Lo Tishkach Foundation 2009 Page 4 Executive Summary 1. Numbers : There are 821 known Jewish cemeteries in Romania. They are located in 720 different localities and taken care of by the country’s 38 Jewish communities . These sites occupy a total area of 410 hectares . The Federation of Jewish Communities in Romania (FEDROM) considers more than 240 hectares to contain graves and 140 hectares to be devoid of graves . 17.5 hectares are used by guards and caretakers and 0.6 hectares are currently rented to third parties , as approved by a rabbinical committee established in November 2008 and consisting of rabbis of Romanian origin. 1 Only 17 sites are recognised and duly registered as national monuments . 108 Jewish cemeteries are still in active use by Jewish communities. 2. Ownership : Whilst no systematic and comprehensive expropriation of Jewish cemeteries occurred in Romania, the administrative and political structure put in place during decades of Communism resulted in a lack of clarity regarding the ownership of the country’s Jewish burial grounds. As a result, in 2002, the Romanian government reaffirmed ownership by FEDROM of all Jewish cemeteries and recognised the organisation as the sole representative body of the country’s Jewish community . Unless located on cemeteries, Holocaust memorials and mass grave sites are typically owned by the state or municipalities . Since the 2002 law was passed, FEDROM ownership has been contested by a number of foreign Jewish groups, most prominently, the Association of Jewish Romanian Americans although the community has received public support for its ownership of these sites from such major international Jewish organisations as the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee and the World Jewish Restitution Organisation. 3. Maintenance : Although each Jewish cemetery in Romania belongs to a Jewish community in relative proximity that is supposed to take care of the sites under its jurisdiction, the means to carry out this mission are largely insufficient. FEDROM claims it is currently not in a position to maintain more than 30 per cent of all Jewish cemeteries in acceptable conditions . The Romanian state provides annual subsidies to FEDROM for the restoration and maintenance of Jewish cemeteries. The amount of funds varies significantly from one year to another and range between 9,000 USD (1995) and 234,000 USD (exceptional peak in 2007) per year. A number of sites are regularly maintained by caretakers in exchange for a small salary and free housing in buildings located on cemeteries. 4. Legal situation: A number of provisions in different bodies of law may be used to campaign for better protection and preservation of Jewish burial grounds in Romania. They include the Romanian constitution, cultural heritage legislation as well as the criminal code. 5. Recommendations : • Proper demarcation and fencing of all Jewish burial grounds in Romania; • Stable annual funding for cemetery maintenance throughout the country; • A negotiated solution between the Jewish community, municipalities and the national government to increase the level of protection and public funding granted under cultural heritage legislation, and to award monument status to more Jewish burial grounds. 1 The members of the committee are Rabbi Schmuel Schmelke Halpert, Rabbi Yoel Tobias, Rabbi Ahron Rotter, Rabbi Haim Leib Deutsch, Rabbi Israel Portugal (represented by Rabbi Shimon Weinberger) and Rabbi Elyakim Schlesinger (represented by Rabbi Moshe Herschaft). Lo Tishkach Foundation 2009 Page 5 Introduction 1.1 Project Introduction As a result of the ravages of the Holocaust and the subsequent waves of emigration, Europe’s Jewish population now stands at around 1.5 million, 8 million fewer than in 1933. Many areas in Central and Eastern Europe with previously vibrant Jewish communities no longer have a single Jewish resident; others have small and ageing Jewish populations, unable to fulfil their duty to care for the graves of those buried in thousands of Jewish cemeteries and mass graves. Most of these sites lie unvisited and unprotected, severely damaged by the destruction wrought by the Nazis and during the Communist era and at risk from neglect, vandalism, development, theft, inappropriate development and well-meaning but inexpert attempts at restoration. Without immediate action many will soon be lost forever. Lo Tishkach was established in 2006 as a joint project of the Conference of European Rabbis and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany to guarantee the effective and lasting preservation and protection of Jewish cemeteries, Jewish sections of municipal cemeteries and mass graves throughout the European continent, estimated at more than 20,000 in 49 countries. One of the key aims of the project, identified by the Hebrew phrase Lo Tishkach (‘do not forget’), is to establish a comprehensive, publicly-accessible database of Jewish burial grounds in Europe. This is now available on the project’s website (www.lo-tishkach.org ) and currently features data on over 10,000 Jewish burial grounds. Data collected will be used to both facilitate research into this fundamental aspect of Europe’s Jewish heritage, and to provide a starting point for local- level actions to protect and preserve Jewish burial grounds throughout Europe. In order to afford large-scale, lasting protection to these valuable sites, local-level work, while extremely valuable, is not enough. It is crucial to ensure that there is a sufficiently robust legal environment
Recommended publications
  • Satumare.Pdf
    39DILúDUHMXGHĠ Proces-verbal din data 24.05.2016SULYLQGGHVHPQDUHDSUHúHGLQĠLORUELURXULORUHOHFWRUDOHDOHVHFĠLLORUGHYRWDUH constituite pentru alegerile locale din anul 2016úLDORFĠLLWRULORUDFHVWRUD &LUFXPVFULSĠLD(OHFWRUDOă-XGHĠHDQăQU32, SATU MARE ,QL܊LDOD Nr. crt. UAT 1U6HF܊LH ,QVWLWX܊LD )XQF܊LD Nume Prenume $GUHVă WDWăOXL GRADINITA CU PROGRAM PRELUNGIT SATU MARE, MUNICIPIUL SATU 1 MUNICIPIUL SATU MARE 1 "DRAGA MEA" 3UH܈HGLQWH COZA IOANA G MARE (GRADINITA "DRAGA MEA"( GRADINITA CU PROGRAM PRELUNGIT SATU MARE, MUNICIPIUL SATU 2 MUNICIPIUL SATU MARE 1 "DRAGA MEA" /RF܊LLWRU NEIMET MAGDALENA-MARIA I MARE (GRADINITA "DRAGA MEA"( GRADINITA CU PROGRAM PRELUNGIT SATU MARE, MUNICIPIUL SATU 3 MUNICIPIUL SATU MARE 2 "DRAGA MEA" 3UH܈HGLQWH HUSAR MARIANA-ILEANA A MARE (GRADINITA "DRAGA MEA"( GRADINITA CU PROGRAM PRELUNGIT SATU MARE, MUNICIPIUL SATU 4 MUNICIPIUL SATU MARE 2 "DRAGA MEA" /RF܊LLWRU %8&85(ù7($1 LOREDANA-NARCISA M MARE (GRADINITA "DRAGA MEA"( $62&,$ğ,$&$5,7$6 SATU MARE CANTRUL SATU MARE, MUNICIPIUL SATU 5 MUNICIPIUL SATU MARE 3 3UH܈HGLQWH OSTATE MIRCEA-GHEORGHE G SOCIAL DESCHIS LA MARE CASA PRIETENIEI $62&,$ğ,$&$5,7$6 SATU MARE CANTRUL SATU MARE, MUNICIPIUL SATU 6 MUNICIPIUL SATU MARE 3 /RF܊LLWRU OSTATE CLAUDIA-DORINA M SOCIAL DESCHIS LA MARE CASA PRIETENIEI 1/55 39DILúDUHMXGHĠ ,QL܊LDOD Nr. crt. UAT 1U6HF܊LH ,QVWLWX܊LD )XQF܊LD Nume Prenume $GUHVă WDWăOXL ܇&2$/$*,01$=,$/Ă³ ,21&5($1*Ă´ ù&&8 SATU MARE, MUNICIPIUL SATU 7 MUNICIPIUL SATU MARE 4 3UH܈HGLQWH DURKOVICS TATIANA I CLS.I-VIII³,21&5($1*Ă MARE ´ ܇&2$/$*,01$=,$/Ă³ ,21&5($1*Ă´ ù&&8 SATU MARE,
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Declaratiilor De Casatorie 2018 Numele Si Prenumele Domnului
    Lista declaratiilor de casatorie 2018 Numele si Numele si Domiciliul prenumele Varsta Domiciliu prenumele Varsta Judet Judetul (Localitatea) doamnei (Localitatea) domnului SILAGHI HORILLA ISTVAN 31 CAREI SATU-MARE 26 CAREI SATU-MARE CLAUDIA DINCA CONSTANTIN- 43 CAREI SATU-MARE BICHIȘ MONICA 32 CAREI SATU-MARE DANUT KUNCZ SAJTOS LEVENTE 46 CAREI SATU-MARE 37 CAREI SATU-MARE ZSUZSANNA CZAILI BOBRIC ADRIAN 49 CAREI SATU-MARE 47 CAREI SATU-MARE ANNAMARIA PISCORNIȚ BIRTA REKA- NICOLAE- 35 CAREI SATU-MARE 36 CAREI SATU-MARE MARIA ALEXANDRU DARIDA CHIVARI CLAUDIU- 38 CAREI SATU-MARE ALEXANDRA- 29 BAIA-MARE MARAMUREȘ ADRIAN EMILIA GYALAI CAROL 37 CAREI SATU-MARE KOVECSI ANNA 32 BERVENI SATU-MARE HEVELI VALTER- SZAKAL 33 CAREI SATU-MARE 30 CAREI SATU-MARE ISTVAN MELINDA ERDEI MUREȘ AN MIRCEA 61 CAREI SATU-MARE CONSTANȚ A- 51 CAREI SATU-MARE LILIANA Lista declaratiilor de casatorie 2018 Numele si Numele si Domiciliul prenumele Varsta Domiciliu prenumele Varsta Judet Judetul (Localitatea) doamnei (Localitatea) domnului PONGRACZ MURVAI GYORGY- 41 CAREI SATU-MARE TUNDE- 44 CAREI SATU-MARE GABOR ZSUZSANNA KISS NORBERT- CADAR LAVINIA- 32 CAREI SATU-MARE 32 SATU-MARE SATU-MARE ISTVAN ANAMARIA MITRASCA HAGEN ARNOLD 33 CAREI SATU-MARE 25 CAREI SATU-MARE EDINA-DENISA MAGHIAR BOITOR VALERIAN 27 SATU-MARE SATU-MARE CATALINA- 27 CAREI SATU-MARE IOANA SORIAN MIHALY 40 CAREI SATU-MARE 40 CAREI SATU-MARE GHEORGHE-VASILE MIHAELA Lista declaratiilor de casatorie 2018 Numele si Numele si Domiciliul prenumele Varsta Domiciliu prenumele Varsta Judet Judetul (Localitatea)
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Residential Segregation in Three Cities of Northwest Romania1
    Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 60 (2) (2011) 189–216. Ethnic residential segregation in three cities of Northwest Romania1 Patrik TÁTRAI2 Abstract While ethnic residential segregation research is still current in Western Europe and in North America, there are only few studies about urban ethnic patt erns of the former state socialist countries. This article is an att empt to contribute with an analysis of three cities (Oradea, Satu Mare, Baia Mare) in Northwest Romania. As no census data are available below the sett lement level, there were used the results of the Hungarian ethnic party achieved at Romanian parliamentary elections. Based on this method the spatial posi- tion of the Hungarian inhabitants could be drawn, while fi eld work helped to map the distribution of the Roma population. The result is a ‘quasi-segregated’ situation: there exist parts of the cities, where the otherwise minority ethnic group Hungarians live as local majority, but their distribution is rather uniform. The residential segregation of Roma is spectacular, but due to the lack of data it cannot be quantifi ed. Keywords: Romania, segregation, ethnic geography, electoral geography, urban space Introduction Study on the spatial position of ethnic groups is one of the main targets of ethnic geography. In East Central Europe the still existing ethnic diversity creates an opportunity to study the ethnic issues from diff erent perspectives: from national/regional level down to local/sett lement level. Until presenty most of this research related to ethnic geography focused on the regional level, independently of the size of the territorial unit. While in Western Europe and in the Anglo-Saxon countries, studies on the ethnic patt erns of the urban space 1 The research was supported by the Pro Renovanda Cultura Hungariae Fund, the ‘SefoNe – Searching for Neighbours’ EU FP6 project, the 77973 OTKA project and the ‘Szülőföld Alap’.
    [Show full text]
  • Denumire Adresa Localitate Judet
    Denumire Adresa Localitate Judet Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. C.S. ANDERCO NR 1 SATU MARE SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. SIRUL MARE NR 104 BOTIZ SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 52A BABTA SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. SIRUL MARE NR 10 BOTIZ SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 152A SARAUAD SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR PRINCIPALA NR 38 TURULUNG SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR PRINCIPALA NR 22 TURULUNG SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA BL 1 BERVENI SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. NICOLAE IORGA NR 1 TASNAD SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 61 PISCOLT SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 171 LAZURI SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 307 CIUMESTI SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. OGORULUI NR 966 SANISLAU SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. INDEPENDENTEI NR 53 SATU MARE SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 189 CRUCISOR SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 25/A CAMIN SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 106 CULCIU MARE SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint MACINULUI NR 13 SATU MARE SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. MIRON COSTIN NR 33 SATU MARE SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 621 MEDIESU AURIT SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. PRINCIPALA NR 23 ROMANESTI SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. C.S. ANDERCO NR 22 SATU MARE SATU MARE Magazin Partener PayPoint STR. TRANDAFIRILOR NR 51 TASNAD SATU MARE STR. MARTIRILOR DEPORTATI NR Magazin Partener PayPoint SATU MARE SATU MARE 10 Magazin Partener PayPoint STR.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity and Politics in the Romanian Space: the Case of Northwestern Transylvania Brie, Mircea
    www.ssoar.info Ethnicity and politics in the Romanian space: the case of northwestern Transylvania Brie, Mircea Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerksbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Brie, M. (2014). Ethnicity and politics in the Romanian space: the case of northwestern Transylvania. In S. Şipoş, G. Moisa, D. O. Cepraga, M. Brie, & T. Mateoc (Eds.), From periphery to centre: the image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe (pp. 158-170). Cluj-Napoca: Ed. Acad. Română. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168- ssoar-400243 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Ethnicity and politics in the Romanian space. The case of northwestern Transylvania1 Mircea Brie Abstract. The ethnic structure of this region has been heavily influenced by the evolution of the various historico-geographical factors and policies. Most of this structure, however, is linked to the evolution of the denominational structure. Ethnicity in this case is closely related to religion. The political reality, the events with political overtones that occurred during these centurieshad a direct influence regarding the conduct of processes and phenomena related to the ethno- confessional evolution of the area subject to our research. In this period the region is part of the Austrian state (before 1867), Austro-Hungarian Empire (1867 to 1918), Hungary (1940-1944) and Romania (1918-1940, 1944 - present).
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Cemetery of Sathmar
    TheThe JewishJewish CemeteryCemetery ofof SathmarSathmar INTRODUCTION Beth Hachaim – The Home of the Living – is how Jews call their cemeteries, because they consider the dead alive for ever and their souls immortal. A renowned phisicist let engraving on his tomb the following truth: “I am still being, just changed my aggregate”. But The Home of the Living, the cemetery, lives for as long as it maintains a spiritual tie with the descendants and conveys a meaning to posterity, then nothing is less desolate than a forgotten cemetery. Fortunately, remembering the ancestors is part of our respect to them, and respecting them is a mitzvah for us. This portfolio was thought to be a full documentation of the Jewish Cemetery from Sathmar. The main intention was to give a helping hand to those who are looking for the graves of their ancestors, then to help each documentary work regarding to Jewish burial sites, genealogy, etc. For that purpose, each readable gravestone (more then 2,300) - standing, fallen or broken, beginning with the oldest ones – have been photographed. More than 1,000 gravestones were cleaned with sandpaper to make readable at least the engraved names. Despite of my effort to document so much graves as possible, there were some missing gravestones, or not readable at all, especially those made of limestone. The pictures are recorded on two DVDs included in this portfolio, together with the pages of the cemetery registry. These can be viewed on each PC, magnified or printed if wanted. The Orthodox Cemetery Registry pages are scaned to avoid mistakes at transcription, but those of the Status Quo Ante cemetery are completed using the original register.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanide Spill at Baia Mare Romania
    CYANIDE SPILL AT BAIA MARE ROMANIA UNEP / OCHA Assessment Mission March 2000 SPILL OF LIQUID AND SUSPENDED WASTE AT THE AURUL S.A. RETREATMENT PLANT IN BAIA MARE United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP / Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs, OCHA Assessment Mission Romania, Hungary, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 23 February - 6 March 2000 REPORT Geneva, March 2000 NOTES The views expressed in this document are those of the invited experts and do not necessarily reflect those of their organizations and institutions. For further technical details and background information, you may wish to consult web site http: //www.natural-resources.org/environment /Baiamare and http: //www.reliefweb.int/ocha_ol/index.html Copies of this report are available from web site http: //www.unep.ch/roe/baiamare.htm and http: //www.reliefweb.int/ocha_ol/index.html United Nations Environment Programme - Regional Office for Europe 15, chemin des Anémones, CH-1219 Châtelaine - Geneva, Switzerland Joint UNEP/OCHA Environment Unit - Disaster Response Branch UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Palais des Nations - CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland UNEP/OCHA Assessment Mission – Cyanide Spill at Baia Mare REPORT Table of Contents Page 1 The Mission 3 1.1 Mission Context 3 1.2 Mission Logistics and Approach 3 1.3 Acknowledgements 5 2 The Accident 6 2.1 The Extraction Process 6 2.2 Sequence of Events and Responses 6 3 Baia Mare and Maramures County: Background and History 8 4 The Aurul Plant and Operations 10 4.1 Background 10 4.2
    [Show full text]
  • Romania: Jewish Family History Research Guide
    Courtesy of the Ackman & Ziff Family Genealogy Institute July 2007 Romania: Jewish Family History Research Guide Historical Background Like most European countries, Romania’s borders have changed considerably over time. Starting in the late 15 th century, the Ottoman Empire ruled the Romanian provinces of Moldavia, Walachia, and Dobruja, while Austria and Hungary controlled Banat, Bihor, Maramures, Satu Mare, and Transylvania. Austria took over Bukovina (northwestern Moldavia) in 1774, and Russia obtained Bessarabia (eastern Moldavia) in 1812. An unsuccessful Balkan revolt against the Turks ultimately led to Russian occupation of Walachia and Moldavia from 1829­34. The two principalities merged in 1859 to form Romania (also spelled Rumania or Roumania at various times), which remained subservient to the Ottomans until full independence was achieved in 1878. The province of Dobruja was also added at that time. After World War I Romania regained control over the territories of Banat, Bessarabia, Bihor, Bukovina, Maramures, Satu Mare, and Transylvania at the expense of Austria­Hungary and Russia. During the Holocaust period, Romania temporarily gave up northern Transylvania (including northern Bihor, Maramures, and Satu Mare) to Hungary, and permanently lost northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (now the Republic of Moldova) to the Soviet Union. Jews were present in the region under the Roman Empire, but subsequent invasions and wars severely disrupted their existence. The Jewish population increased significantly after 1800, primarily due to immigration. These resources at the Center for Jewish History contain further historical details: Encyclopedia of Eastern Europe Modern reference work gives a balanced history of disputed territories, such as Transylvania. Romanian topics are covered on pages 666­698.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.70.1.1Oşlobanu, C. and Alexe,Hungarian M. Hungarian Geographical Geographical Bulletin Bulletin 70 70 2021 (2021) (1) (1) 3–18. 3–183 Built-up area analysis using Sentinel data in metropolitan areas of Transylvania, Romania Constantin OŞLOBANU and Mircea ALEXE1 Abstract The anthropic and natural elements have become more closely monitored and analysed through the use of remote sensing and GIS applications. In this regard, the study aims to feature a different approach to produce more and more thematic information, focusing on the development of built-up areas. In this paper, multispec- tral images and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images were the basis of a wide range of proximity analyses. These allow the extraction of data about the distribution of built-up space on the areas with potential for economic and social development. Application of interferometric coherence and supervised classifications have been accomplished on various territories, such as metropolitan areas of the most developed region of Romania, more specifically Transylvania. The results indicate accuracy values, which can reach 94 per cent for multispectral datasets and 93 per cent for SAR datasets. The accuracy of resulted data will reveal a variety of city patterns, depending mainly on local features regarding natural and administrative environments. In this way, a comparison will be made between the accuracy of both datasets to provide an analysis of the manner of built-up areas distribution to assess the expansion of the studied metropolitan areas. Therefore, this study aims to apply well-established methods from the remote sensing field to enhance the information and datasets in some areas lacking recent research.
    [Show full text]
  • September 03, 1968 P. Shelest on Romanian Reactions to the Unrest in Czechoslovakia
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified September 03, 1968 P. Shelest on Romanian Reactions to the Unrest in Czechoslovakia Citation: “P. Shelest on Romanian Reactions to the Unrest in Czechoslovakia,” September 03, 1968, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, TsDAHOU, F. 1, Op. 25, Spr. 32, Ll. 168-172. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112461 Summary: P. Shelest reports on observations by small delegations of Ukrainian workers to Romania. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation Top Secret C P S U C C At the invitation of the Satu Mare, Maramures, and Suceava county committees and the Tulcea municipal committee of the Romanian Communist Party,356 delegations of workers from Transcarpathia, Ivano-Frankivs'k, and Chernivtsi oblasts and the city of Izmail, consisting of 3-4 people each, visited these counties of the Socialist Republic of Romania (with which they maintain permanent friendly ties) on 22-26 August to take part in ceremonies commemorating the 24th anniversary of the liberation of the country from fascist oppression. The oblast committees and Izmail municipal committee of the Ukrainian CP reported to the UkrCP CC about the results of these trips and the nature of the meetings and discussions they had with the leaders of the above-mentioned [Romanian] counties. The Soviet delegations witnessed the reactions of the Romanian side to the latest events connected with Czechoslovakia.357 Above all, it was evident that the population of Romania has not been given objective information about the state of affairs. It was also evident that information about the Soviet Union has been hushed up, and that a frenzied atmosphere of hostility has been stirred up against our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Sváb Bevándorlás a 18K Században Szatmár Megyében
    The 1834 Ermellek earthquake effects and the architecture of migration after war in Baroque times Maria BOSTENARU DAN Context Sathmar Swabians migrated from SW Germany to Sathmar in Romania, along the Danube. Migration happened in the 18th century, starting 1712. In SW Germany that time Baroque churches started to be built. Also in Sathmar they built Baroque churches. My grandfather was a Sathmar Swabian, hence genealogy research and personal communication with friends and relatives was combined with architectural history and earthquake engineering and geography research. Research questions The first aim of the research was to compare church architecture and vernacular architecture of Sathmar Swabians in their origin places with the places they colonised. It was observed, that the churches, although Baroque, are different, and that the vernacular architecture is also different. While in case of churches this may be influenced by foreign architects, in case of vernacular architecture it may be influenced by the fact that original architecture is not kept, as it was destroyed by the 1834 earthquake, and afterwards construction followed the rules fromVienna for migrants which came later to Banat. Methods Literature research Field investigation (site visits, discussions with inhabitants and site administrators) Archive research in genealogy archives Mapping Network analysis Comparative architecture investigation Results Migration Earthquake Migration Donauschwabenufer A plate on the Danube shore in Ulm, Germany, commemorating the places where Sathmar Swabians settled: 31 localities founded in the 18th century Oberschwaben The localities of origin of Sathmar Swabians in SW Germany. Satu-Mare The places where the Swabians settled in Sathmar, NW Romania Gephi Network analysis of the localities most Swabians came from Places in Oberschwaben Where the colonists came from The photos follow an exhibition in the Schiller house of German minority in Bucharest.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Guide for Conference Participants
    The How, Where and What in Cluj-Napoca Practical Guide for Conference Participants ROTRIB 2019 September 19-21, 2019, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Contents • Getting to Cluj-Napoca (bus and train) 3 • Getting to Cluj-Napoca (plane) 4 • Staying in Cluj-Napoca (hotels) 5 • ROTRIB 2019 Conference Location 6 • Getting to the Conference by taxi 7 • Getting to the Conference by bus or tram 8 • What to visit in Cluj-Napoca and near 9 • Restaurants in Cluj-Napoca 10 • Places to have a drink in Cluj-Napoca 11 • 80s Disco Party 12 Getting to Cluj-Napoca (bus and train) • By bus to Cluj-Napoca “Fany Bus Station” or “Sens Vest Bus Station”: • Eurolines (info) • Pletl (info) • Tarsim (info) • Atlasib (info) • Flixbus (info) • By train to Cluj-Napoca Central Railway Station: • More info to plan your journey to Cluj-Napoca here. 3 Getting to Cluj-Napoca (plane) • Cluj-Napoca International Airport (15 km from City Center – (Bus or taxi to City Center, Line 5 – see schedule here, 4 RON Ticket) (WizzAir, Tarom, Lufthansa, Blueair, LOT, Turkish Airlines, Ryanair) • Airports close to Cluj-Napoca: • Transilvania Airport Targu Mures -> 2 hours drive to Cluj-Napoca (NIRAJ Transfers - +40 732 530 515) • Satu Mare International Airport -> 3 hours drive to Cluj-Napoca • Oradea International Airport -> 3 hours drive to Cluj-Napoca (taxi or buss 28 (schedule here) to Oradea City Center, then buss (Autogen, CDI or Fany) to Cluj- Napoca • Maramures International Airport Baia Mare -> 2.5 hours drive to Cluj-Napoca (taxi to Baia Mare “Fany Buss Station”, then Fany to Cluj-Napoca)
    [Show full text]