76024 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices

CA; LSI Corporation of Milpitas, CA; with respect to the articles potentially INTERNATIONAL TRADE MediaTek Inc. of Hsin-Chu, Taiwan; subject to the orders; and COMMISSION nVidia Corporation of Santa Clara, CA; (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, [Inv. No. 337–TA–602] STMicroelectronics of Geneva, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third Switzerland; STMicroelectronics Inc., of party suppliers have the capacity to In the Matter of Certain GPS Devices Carrollton, TX; Asustek Computer Inc. replace the volume of articles and Products Containing Same; of Taipei City, Taiwan; Asus Computer potentially subject to an exclusion order Enforcement Proceeding; Notice of International Inc. of Fremont, CA; and a cease and desist order within a Institution of Formal Enforcement Audio Partnership PLC of London, commercially reasonable time. Proceeding; Denial of Motion for United Kingdom; Biostar Microtech Sanctions (U.S.A.) Corp. of City of Industry, CA; Written submissions must be filed no Biostar Microtech International Corp. of later than by close of business, five AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Hsin Tien, Taiwan; Cisco Systems, Inc. business days after the date of Commission. publication of this notice in the Federal of San Jose, CA; Elitegroup Computer ACTION: Notice. Systems of Taipei, Taiwan; EVGA Register. There will be further Corporation of Brea, CA; Galaxy opportunities for comment on the SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Microsystems Ltd. of Kowloon Bay, public interest after the issuance of any the U.S. International Trade KLN, Hong Kong; Garmin International final initial determination in this Commission has instituted a formal of Olathe, KS; G.B.T. Inc. of City of investigation. enforcement proceeding relating to the Industry, CA; Giga-Byte Technology Co., Persons filing written submissions limited exclusion order and cease-and- Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; Gracom must file the original document and 12 desist orders issued at the conclusion of Technologies LLC of City of Industry, true copies thereof on or before the the above-captioned investigation. The CA; Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo deadlines stated above with the Office Commission has also denied a motion Alto, CA; Hitachi Global Storage of San of the Secretary. Submissions should for sanctions. Jose, CA; Jaton Corporation of Fremont, refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CA; Jaton Technology TPE of Hsi-Chih, 2771’’) in a prominent place on the Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General Taiwan; Micro-Star International Co., cover page and/or the first page. The Counsel, U.S. International Trade Ltd. of Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; MSI Commission’s rules authorize filing Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Computer Corporation of City of submissions with the Secretary by Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) Industry, CA; Motorola, Inc. of facsimile or electronic means only to the 205–1999. Copies of all nonconfidential Schaumburg, IL; Oppo Digital, Inc. of extent permitted by section 201.8 of the documents filed in connection with this Mountain View, CA; Palit Microsystems rules (see Handbook for Electronic investigation are or will be available for Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; Pine Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ inspection during official business Techonology Holdings, Ltd of North secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Point, Hong Kong; Seagate Technology documents/ Office of the Secretary, U.S. of Scotts Valley, CA; Sparkle Computer handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf ). International Trade Commission, 500 E Co., Ltd. of Taipepi County, Taiwan; Persons with questions regarding Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Zotac International (MCO) Ltd. of electronic filing should contact the telephone 202–205–2000. General Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong; and Zotac Secretary (202–205–2000). information concerning the Commission USA Inc. of City of Industry, CA. Any person desiring to submit a may also be obtained by accessing its The complainant, proposed document to the Commission in Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). respondents, other interested parties, confidence must request confidential The public record for this investigation and members of the public are invited treatment. All such requests should be may be viewed on the Commission’s to file comments, not to exceed five directed to the Secretary to the electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// pages in length, on any public interest Commission and must include a full edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired issues raised by the complaint. statement of the reasons why the persons are advised that information on Comments should address whether Commission should grant such the matter can be obtained by contacting issuance of an exclusion order and/or a treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– cease and desist order in this for which confidential treatment by the 205–1810. investigation would negatively affect the Commission is properly sought will be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The public health and welfare in the United treated accordingly. All nonconfidential underlying investigation was instituted States, competitive conditions in the written submissions will be available for on May 7, 2007, based on a complaint United States economy, the production public inspection at the Office of the filed by Global Locate, Inc., a subsidiary of like or directly competitive articles in Secretary. of Broadcom Corporation (collectively, the United States, or United States This action is taken under the ‘‘Broadcom’’). 72 FR 25777 (2007). The consumers. authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act complaint alleged violations of section In particular, the Commission is of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 337 in the importation into the United interested in comments that: and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) States, the sale for importation, or the (i) Explain how the articles of the Commission’s Rules of Practice sale within the United States after potentially subject to the orders are used and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, importation of certain global positioning in the United States; 210.50(a)(4)). system (‘‘GPS’’) devices and products (ii) Identify any public health, safety, containing the same by reason of By order of the Commission. or welfare concerns in the United States infringement of various claims of U.S. relating to the potential orders; Issued: December 2, 2010. Patent Nos. 6,704,651 (‘‘the ‘651 (iii) Indicate the extent to which like Marilyn R. Abbott, patent’’); 6,651,000 (‘‘the ‘000 patent’’); or directly competitive articles are Secretary to the Commission. 6,606,346 (‘‘the ‘346 patent’’); 6,937,187 produced in the United States or are [FR Doc. 2010–30610 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] (‘‘the ‘187 patent’’); 6,417,801 (‘‘the ‘801 otherwise available in the United States, BILLING CODE 7020–02–P patent’’); and 7,158,080 (‘‘the ‘080

VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:39 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices 76025

patent’’). The complaint in the Having examined the complaint DATES: Effective Date: October 20, 2010. underlying investigation named as seeking a formal enforcement FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: respondents SiRF Technology, Inc. proceeding, and having found that the Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of (‘‘SiRF’’), E–TEN Corp. (‘‘E–TEN’’), complaint complies with the Investigations, U.S. International Trade Pharos Science & Applications, Inc. requirements for institution of a formal Commission, 500 E Street SW., (‘‘Pharos’’), MiTAC International enforcement proceeding contained in Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- Corporation (‘‘MiTAC’’), and Mio Commission rule 210.75, 19 CFR 210.75, impaired individuals are advised that Technology Limited (‘‘Mio’’) the Commission has determined to information on this matter can be (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). institute a formal enforcement obtained by contacting the On January 15, 2009, the Commission proceeding to determine whether the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– found a violation of section 337 by respondents are in violation of the 205–1810. Persons with mobility Respondents by reason of infringement Commission’s limited exclusion order impairments who will need special of all six asserted patents. The and cease-and-desist orders issued in assistance in gaining access to the Commission issued a limited exclusion the investigation, and what, if any, Commission should contact the Office and cease-and-desist orders against enforcement measures are appropriate. of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. SiRF, Pharos, and Mio. The remedial The following entities are named as General information concerning the orders are directed to GPS devices and parties to the formal enforcement Commission may also be obtained by products containing the same that proceeding: (1) Complainant Broadcom, accessing its Internet server http:// (2) respondents SiRF, MiTAC, MiTAC infringe or are covered by certain claims www.usitc.gov. of the ‘346, ‘651, ‘000, ‘080, ‘187, and/ Digital, Mio, Pharos, and CSR; and (3) or ‘801 patents. Respondents a Commission investigative attorney to Authority: These reviews are being subsequently appealed the be designated by the Director, Office of terminated under authority of title VII of the Commission’s final determination to the Unfair Import Investigations. Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published The authority for the Commission’s pursuant to section 207.69 of the United States Court of Appeals for Commission’s rules (19 CFR 207.69). Federal Circuit (‘‘Federal Circuit’’). In a determination is contained in section precedential opinion issued April 12, 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as By order of the Commission. 2010, the Federal Circuit affirmed the amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Marilyn R. Abbott, Commission’s Final Determination in all section 210.75 of the Commission’s Secretary to the Commission. respects. Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Issued: December 1, 2010. On August 16, 2010, the Commission 210.75). [FR Doc. 2010–30611 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] instituted modification proceedings By order of the Commission. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P under 19 CFR 210.76 based on a petition Issued: December 1, 2010. for modification filed by Respondents. Marilyn R. Abbott, At the same time, the Commission Secretary to the Commission. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE denied a petition for modification filed [FR Doc. 2010–30617 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] by Broadcom. The modification Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree proceedings are currently ongoing. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Under the Comprehensive On October 7, 2010, Broadcom filed a Environmental Response, complaint seeking institution of a INTERNATIONAL TRADE Compensation, and Liability Act formal enforcement proceeding to COMMISSION enforce the limited exclusion order and Pursuant to Department of Justice cease-and-desist orders against [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–376 and 563– policy, notice is hereby given that on Respondents under Commission rule 564 (Third Review)] December 1, 2010 a proposed Consent 210.75(b), 19 CFR 210.75(b). The Decree with Brown County and the City enforcement complaint named SiRF, Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings of Green Bay was lodged with the MiTAC, Mio, Pharos, E–TEN, MiTAC From Japan, Korea, and Taiwan United States District Court for the Digitial Corporation (‘‘MiTAC Digital’’), AGENCY: United States International Eastern District of Wisconsin in a case and CSR plc (‘‘CSR’’) as proposed Trade Commission. captioned United States and the State of enforcement respondents. Shortly after ACTION: Termination of five-year Wisconsin v. NCR Corp., et al., Case No. the enforcement complaint was filed, reviews. 10–C–910 (E.D. Wis.). The Complaint in Broadcom withdrew its allegations with that case alleges claims under the respect to E–TEN. SUMMARY: The subject five-year reviews Comprehensive Environmental On October 22, 2010, the proposed were initiated in September 2010 to Response, Compensation, and Liability enforcement respondents filed a motion determine whether revocation of the Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–75, with the Commission requesting antidumping duty orders on stainless against Brown County, the City of Green sanctions against Broadcom. The motion steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Japan, Bay, and twelve other defendants alleges, among other things, that Korea, and Taiwan would be likely to concerning polychlorinated biphenyl Broadcom’s enforcement complaint lead to continuation or recurrence of contamination at the Lower Fox River does not comply with Commission rule material injury. On November 5, 2010, and Green Bay Superfund Site in 210.4(c), 19 CFR 210.4(c), regarding the Department of Commerce published northeastern Wisconsin (the ‘‘Site’’). representations made to the notice that it was revoking the orders If approved by the Court after a public Commission. On November 3, 2010, effective October 20, 2010, ‘‘{b}ecause comment period, the proposed Consent Broadcom opposed the motion. On no interested domestic party responded Decree would resolve Brown County’s November 9, 2010, the proposed to the sunset review notice of initiation and the City of Green Bay’s potential enforcement respondents filed a motion by the applicable deadline * * *’’ (75 liability for response costs, response for leave to reply in support of their FR 68324). Accordingly, pursuant to actions, and natural resource damages motion for sanctions. The Commission section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 associated with the Site, on the terms has denied the motion for sanctions and (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject reviews and conditions set forth in the Decree. the motion for leave. are terminated. The proposed Consent Decree also

VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:39 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES