Enforcement Proceeding; Notice of International Inc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
76024 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices CA; LSI Corporation of Milpitas, CA; with respect to the articles potentially INTERNATIONAL TRADE MediaTek Inc. of Hsin-Chu, Taiwan; subject to the orders; and COMMISSION nVidia Corporation of Santa Clara, CA; (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, [Inv. No. 337–TA–602] STMicroelectronics of Geneva, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third Switzerland; STMicroelectronics Inc., of party suppliers have the capacity to In the Matter of Certain GPS Devices Carrollton, TX; Asustek Computer Inc. replace the volume of articles and Products Containing Same; of Taipei City, Taiwan; Asus Computer potentially subject to an exclusion order Enforcement Proceeding; Notice of International Inc. of Fremont, CA; and a cease and desist order within a Institution of Formal Enforcement Audio Partnership PLC of London, commercially reasonable time. Proceeding; Denial of Motion for United Kingdom; Biostar Microtech Sanctions (U.S.A.) Corp. of City of Industry, CA; Written submissions must be filed no Biostar Microtech International Corp. of later than by close of business, five AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Hsin Tien, Taiwan; Cisco Systems, Inc. business days after the date of Commission. publication of this notice in the Federal of San Jose, CA; Elitegroup Computer ACTION: Notice. Systems of Taipei, Taiwan; EVGA Register. There will be further Corporation of Brea, CA; Galaxy opportunities for comment on the SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Microsystems Ltd. of Kowloon Bay, public interest after the issuance of any the U.S. International Trade KLN, Hong Kong; Garmin International final initial determination in this Commission has instituted a formal of Olathe, KS; G.B.T. Inc. of City of investigation. enforcement proceeding relating to the Industry, CA; Giga-Byte Technology Co., Persons filing written submissions limited exclusion order and cease-and- Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; Gracom must file the original document and 12 desist orders issued at the conclusion of Technologies LLC of City of Industry, true copies thereof on or before the the above-captioned investigation. The CA; Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo deadlines stated above with the Office Commission has also denied a motion Alto, CA; Hitachi Global Storage of San of the Secretary. Submissions should for sanctions. Jose, CA; Jaton Corporation of Fremont, refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CA; Jaton Technology TPE of Hsi-Chih, 2771’’) in a prominent place on the Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General Taiwan; Micro-Star International Co., cover page and/or the first page. The Counsel, U.S. International Trade Ltd. of Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; MSI Commission’s rules authorize filing Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Computer Corporation of City of submissions with the Secretary by Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) Industry, CA; Motorola, Inc. of facsimile or electronic means only to the 205–1999. Copies of all nonconfidential Schaumburg, IL; Oppo Digital, Inc. of extent permitted by section 201.8 of the documents filed in connection with this Mountain View, CA; Palit Microsystems rules (see Handbook for Electronic investigation are or will be available for Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; Pine Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ inspection during official business Techonology Holdings, Ltd of North secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Point, Hong Kong; Seagate Technology documents/ Office of the Secretary, U.S. of Scotts Valley, CA; Sparkle Computer handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf ). International Trade Commission, 500 E Co., Ltd. of Taipepi County, Taiwan; Persons with questions regarding Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Zotac International (MCO) Ltd. of electronic filing should contact the telephone 202–205–2000. General Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong; and Zotac Secretary (202–205–2000). information concerning the Commission USA Inc. of City of Industry, CA. Any person desiring to submit a may also be obtained by accessing its The complainant, proposed document to the Commission in Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). respondents, other interested parties, confidence must request confidential The public record for this investigation and members of the public are invited treatment. All such requests should be may be viewed on the Commission’s to file comments, not to exceed five directed to the Secretary to the electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// pages in length, on any public interest Commission and must include a full edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired issues raised by the complaint. statement of the reasons why the persons are advised that information on Comments should address whether Commission should grant such the matter can be obtained by contacting issuance of an exclusion order and/or a treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– cease and desist order in this for which confidential treatment by the 205–1810. investigation would negatively affect the Commission is properly sought will be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The public health and welfare in the United treated accordingly. All nonconfidential underlying investigation was instituted States, competitive conditions in the written submissions will be available for on May 7, 2007, based on a complaint United States economy, the production public inspection at the Office of the filed by Global Locate, Inc., a subsidiary of like or directly competitive articles in Secretary. of Broadcom Corporation (collectively, the United States, or United States This action is taken under the ‘‘Broadcom’’). 72 FR 25777 (2007). The consumers. authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act complaint alleged violations of section In particular, the Commission is of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 337 in the importation into the United interested in comments that: and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) States, the sale for importation, or the (i) Explain how the articles of the Commission’s Rules of Practice sale within the United States after potentially subject to the orders are used and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, importation of certain global positioning in the United States; 210.50(a)(4)). system (‘‘GPS’’) devices and products (ii) Identify any public health, safety, containing the same by reason of By order of the Commission. or welfare concerns in the United States infringement of various claims of U.S. relating to the potential orders; Issued: December 2, 2010. Patent Nos. 6,704,651 (‘‘the ‘651 (iii) Indicate the extent to which like Marilyn R. Abbott, patent’’); 6,651,000 (‘‘the ‘000 patent’’); or directly competitive articles are Secretary to the Commission. 6,606,346 (‘‘the ‘346 patent’’); 6,937,187 produced in the United States or are [FR Doc. 2010–30610 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] (‘‘the ‘187 patent’’); 6,417,801 (‘‘the ‘801 otherwise available in the United States, BILLING CODE 7020–02–P patent’’); and 7,158,080 (‘‘the ‘080 VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:39 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices 76025 patent’’). The complaint in the Having examined the complaint DATES: Effective Date: October 20, 2010. underlying investigation named as seeking a formal enforcement FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: respondents SiRF Technology, Inc. proceeding, and having found that the Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of (‘‘SiRF’’), E–TEN Corp. (‘‘E–TEN’’), complaint complies with the Investigations, U.S. International Trade Pharos Science & Applications, Inc. requirements for institution of a formal Commission, 500 E Street SW., (‘‘Pharos’’), MiTAC International enforcement proceeding contained in Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- Corporation (‘‘MiTAC’’), and Mio Commission rule 210.75, 19 CFR 210.75, impaired individuals are advised that Technology Limited (‘‘Mio’’) the Commission has determined to information on this matter can be (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). institute a formal enforcement obtained by contacting the On January 15, 2009, the Commission proceeding to determine whether the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– found a violation of section 337 by respondents are in violation of the 205–1810. Persons with mobility Respondents by reason of infringement Commission’s limited exclusion order impairments who will need special of all six asserted patents. The and cease-and-desist orders issued in assistance in gaining access to the Commission issued a limited exclusion the investigation, and what, if any, Commission should contact the Office and cease-and-desist orders against enforcement measures are appropriate. of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. SiRF, Pharos, and Mio. The remedial The following entities are named as General information concerning the orders are directed to GPS devices and parties to the formal enforcement Commission may also be obtained by products containing the same that proceeding: (1) Complainant Broadcom, accessing its Internet server http:// (2) respondents SiRF, MiTAC, MiTAC infringe or are covered by certain claims www.usitc.gov. of the ‘346, ‘651, ‘000, ‘080, ‘187, and/ Digital, Mio, Pharos, and CSR; and (3) or ‘801 patents. Respondents a Commission investigative attorney to Authority: These reviews are being subsequently appealed the be designated by the Director, Office of terminated under authority of title VII of the Commission’s final determination to the Unfair Import Investigations. Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published The authority for the Commission’s pursuant to section 207.69 of the United States Court of Appeals for Commission’s rules (19 CFR 207.69). Federal Circuit (‘‘Federal Circuit’’). In a determination is contained in section precedential opinion issued April 12, 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as By order of the Commission. 2010, the Federal Circuit affirmed the amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Marilyn R. Abbott, Commission’s Final Determination in all section 210.75 of the Commission’s Secretary to the Commission. respects. Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Issued: December 1, 2010.