DOCSLIB.ORG

Curriculum Vitae ……………….…………… 2 - List of Publications…………………………… 10 - List of University Courses Taught…………… 30 - List of Guest Lectures………………………

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curriculum Vitae ……………….…………… 2 - List of Publications…………………………… 10 - List of University Courses Taught…………… 30 - List of Guest Lectures……………………… Prof. Dr. Peter Malanczuk page - Curriculum Vitae ……………….…………… 2 - List of Publications…………………………… 10 - List of University Courses Taught…………… 30 - List of Guest Lectures………………………... 36 - List of Contributions to Conferences…………. 50 20120410 Malanczuk Full CV (compiled) Page 1 of 73 Prof. Dr. iur Peter Malanczuk Peking University School of Transnational Law Email: [email protected] PKU Shenzhen Campus HomePage: www.malanczuk.com Graduate School Building B University Town Nanshan District, Xili Shenzhen, 518055 P.R. China Current positions: C.V. Starr Professor of Law, Peking University (PKU) School of Transnational Law [First American-style J.D. programme approved by the State Council in China] located at the PKU Shenzhen Campus Co-Director, Center for Research on Transnational Law (CTL), PKU STL Member of the Academic Advisory Council of the University of Heidelberg, Germany Courses currently taught: Transnational Law Advanced Transnational Law International Economic Law International Commercial Arbitration and ADR International Investment Law and Investor-State Dispute Settlement Curriculum Vitae 1948 Born in Salzgitter-Bad, Germany 1950 Emigration to Canada (Canadian nationality 1958-71) 1959 Return to Germany (German nationality since 1971) Since 2008 Permanent Resident of Hong Kong (SAR), P.R. China Education: 1955-59 Primary school, Sudbury & Toronto, Ontario, Canada 1960-68 Gymnasium Salzgitter-Bad, Germany (Abitur) 1968-73 Studies at the Universities of Göttingen, München and Heidelberg (Certificate: First State Law Examination with distinction) 1973-76 Legal training in courts, government and law firms, Heidelberg (Certificate: Second State Law Examination with distinction) 1982 Hague Academy of International Law, Centre for Studies and Research (Certificate) 1983 Doctor of Law (Dr. iur) summa cum laude, University of Giessen 20120410 Malanczuk Full CV (compiled) Page 2 of 73 Professional career (main appointments): 2012 Visiting Professor, Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies (MEDAC), University of Malta 2011 Visiting Professor, University of Luxembourg 2011 Appointment upon invitation to the Panel of Arbitrators of the Kuala Lumpur Regional Arbitration Centre (established in 1978 under the auspices of the Asian- African Legal Consultative Committee) 2010 Visiting Professor at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland 2010 2010 PKU "Award for Excellence in Teaching" for "outstanding performance in the academic year 2009-2010" Since 2010 Co-Director of the new Center for Research on Transnational Law, PKU STL Since 2009 Member of the Academic Advisory Council of the University of Heidelberg 2009 Visiting Professor, Hebrew University, Faculty of Law, Jerusalem Since 2008 C.V. Starr Professor of Law, Peking University, School of Transnational Law (offering the first American-style J.D. programme approved by the State Council in China) 2004-07 Dean of the School of Law, City University of Hong Kong 2002-07 Professor (Chair) of Law, City University of Hong Kong Founding Director of the WTO Law & Dispute Resolution (WTODR) Centre Programme Leader, Master of Arts in Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Programme 2001-02 Visiting Professor, School of Law, City University of Hong Kong 2001 Distinguished Visiting Professor, The University of Hong Kong 1997-01 Professor, Chair of International Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam Head of Department Founding Director of the GLODIS-Institute (Institute of Globalization, International Economic Law and Dispute Settlement) Director of the LLM in International Law Programme 1992 Visiting Professor, University of Michigan Law School 1990-97 Professor, Chair of International Law, University of Amsterdam Head of Department (1991-92) 1986-89 Legal Assistant of the President at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, The Hague (claims arising from the Islamic Revolution 1979 in Iran) 1981-86 Research Fellow, Max-Planck-Institute of Comparative Public & International Law, Heidelberg 1978-81 Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Exeter, England 1976-78 Academic Assistant, Faculty of Law, University of Giessen, Germany Other Appointments as Visiting Professor: Michigan Law School (1992) University of California at Berkeley (1992) Moscow State University (1994) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (1993) Peking University (1998, 1999, 2000, 2001) 20120410 Malanczuk Full CV (compiled) Page 3 of 73 Tsinghua University (2000) Xiamen Academy of International Law (2007 – General Course on Public International Law) Hebrew University Jerusalem (2009) University of Lausanne (2010) Guest-lectures at many other universities (see separate list) Award of title of Honorary Professor: 2007 Renmin (People’s) University of China (2004: Speech in the “Grand Forum of the Most Honorable Jurists”) 2005 Nanjing University 2003 Shenzhen University 1999 Peking University 1998 China University of Politics and Law 1997 Nankai University Administrative positions at various Universities: Administrative functions at the University of Heidelberg Since 2009 Member of the Academic Advisory Board of the University of Heidelberg, Germany's oldest and finest comprehensive university. The Board advises the University on strategic matters, especially on competing for funding through the Excellence Initiative led by the German Federal Ministry of Education and the German Research Foundation (DFG). The Initiative seeks to promote cutting- edge research, enhance interdisciplinary work in teaching and research, and strengthen the international appeal of outstanding German universities. Heidelberg was a winner in the first round of the competition. Administrative functions at the Peking University School of Transnational Law Since 2010 Co-Director of a newly established Center for Research on Transnational Law (CTL). The center is currently in the phase of formation. Administrative functions at the University of Luxembourg Since 2010 Member of a Selection Committee for the appointment of a professor in Satellite Communications and Media Law (SES Chair) at the Faculty of Law Economics and Finance. Administrative functions at City University of Hong Kong: 2004-07 Dean of the School of Law (SLW). Consolidated self-financing taught post-graduate programmes; reviewed and improved teaching programmes; concluded cooperation agreements with a number of partner institutions in China and abroad. Membership at University level at CityU: . University Council . Committee on Statutes, University Council 20120410 Malanczuk Full CV (compiled) Page 4 of 73 . Senate . University Management Board . Deans’ Conference . Academic Policy Committee . Honorary Fellow Selection Committee . Risk Management Committee . Task Group on Self-financed Programmes . Task Group on Internationalization . Various Approving Committees for Staff Promotion and Review . Working Group on CityU Public Service Awards . Advisory Board of the School of Graduate Studies Functions at the School of Law level at CityU: . Chairman, School Board . Chairman, School Executive Committee . Chairman, School Examination Board . Chairman, School Staffing Committee . Member of various other School and Programme Committees . Acting Director, Research Centre on Chinese and Comparative Law . Founding Director of the WTO Law and Dispute Resolution (WTODR) Centre . Programme Leader, MA in Arbitration and Dispute Resolution . Patron of the SLW Newsletter Board Administrative functions at Erasmus University Rotterdam: 1998 Promoter, award of a Doctorate honoris causa to Professor Dr. Antonio Cassese, First President of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), by Erasmus University Rotterdam 1997-01 Head of the Department of International Law Founding Director of the GLODIS-Institute (Institute of Globalization, International Economic Law and Dispute Settlement Co-founder of the new LLM Programmes in International Law and in International Business and Trade Law, Law Faculty, Erasmus University Rotterdam; Programme Director of the LLM in International Law Programme Concluded cooperation agreements with Peking University, China University of Political Science and Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Hong Kong University and City University of Hong Kong Administrative functions at the University of Amsterdam: 1996-97 Member of the Scientific Board, United Nations International Student Conference of Amsterdam (UNISCA) 1995-96 Co-ordinator at the University of Amsterdam of a TEMPUS/PHARE Joint European Project for Universities in Lithuania, in cooperation with Université Libre de Bruxelles (CERIS); subject areas: international law; human rights 1994-95 Co-ordinator at the University of Amsterdam of a TEMPUS Project of the European Community for Universities in Russia and Lithuania; in cooperation with Université Libre de Bruxelles (CERIS); subject areas: European law, human rights 1993-97 Member of the Curatorium of the Amsterdam School of International Relations 20120410 Malanczuk Full CV (compiled) Page 5 of 73 1992-93 Board Member, Amsterdam School of International Relations 1992-93 Co-ordinator of an academic exchange programme between the University of Amsterdam and Golden Gate University, San Francisco, USA 1992 Initiated and coordinated visit by a delegation of the University of Amsterdam, invited by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ethiopia, to discuss cooperation with various Ministries and Faculties of the University of Addis Ababa; meetings with the UN Economic Commission for Africa, the Bureau of the European Community, and the Organization
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quality Control in International Fact-Finding Outside Criminal Justice for Core International Crimes
    130522 Quality Control in International Fact-Finding Outside Criminal Justice for Core International Crimes The 2013 LI Haopei Lecture and Seminar A seminar organized by the Forum for International Criminal and Humanitarian Law, the European University Institute, and Peking University International Law Institute, on 20 May 2013, 09:00-18:00, at The Refectory, Badia Fiesolana, European University Institute, Florence. There are academic efforts under way to map, and analyse best practices of, the plethora of in- ternational fact-finding1 commissions and other mandates2 to look into allegations of serious violations of international criminal, humanitarian or human rights law. There have been signifi- cant developments in international practice in this area since the Commission of Experts for the former Yugoslavia established pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolution 780 (1992), an institution which served as a catalyst for later developments. The FICHL supports these academic efforts, and it seeks, together with the European University Institute and Peking University International Law Institute, to supplement them by focusing the 2013 LI Haopei Seminar on the specific topic of ‘Quality Control in International Fact-Finding Outside Criminal Justice for Core International Crimes’.3 To serve the interests of professionalization, how can the quality of international fact- finding, -analysis and -reporting be improved? How should the significant developments in fact- work in international criminal jurisdictions since the mid-1990s
    [Show full text]
  • China's Approach to Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Agenda
    This is a repository copy of China’s Approach to Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Agenda. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/96001/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Subedi, SP (2015) China’s Approach to Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Agenda. Chinese Journal of International Law, 14 (3). pp. 437-464. ISSN 1540-1650 https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmv037 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ China’s Approach to Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Agenda Surya P. Subedi* Abstract There is an apprehension in the democratic world about the possible impact of the economic rise of China on the UN human rights agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to Professor Wang Tieya
    A Tribute to Professor Wang Tieya Sienho Yee Professor Wang Tieya and I were several generations apart. Yet we had something in common. We were co-editors for two projects: a book in honor of Li Haopei,1 a dear friend of his and a kind supervisor of mine, and the Chinese Journal of International Law. To some extent we were both rebels. We both had done things that might be perceived to go against common wisdom. Despite the fact that he had been such an eminent scholar when I, a fun-loving undergraduate at Peking University, was introduced to him, Professor Wang displayed no air of importance or stature that normally one might see in a person on Olympic heights. Soon we developed a friendship that in Chinese would be called “Wangnianzhijiao”, friendship defying the gap of age. We shared stories. We exchanged arguments. He critiqued my works. He appreciated a good argument when he saw one. He criticized a questionable one when he found it. He gave credit where it was due. I benefited greatly from his wisdom. Then in 1998, it was suggested that Professor Wang and I co-edit the memorial collection for Li Haopei. Professor Wang immediately accepted the task, despite the fact that I was still a very young man then, although older than I was when I was introduced to him.2 That project was completed in 2000 and the book was published in 2001. In the course of editing that book, some of the disputes between some authors and me were put to him for final decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2005-2006 LSU Law Catalog
    LSU LAW CENTER CATALOG 2005–2006 2005-2006 LSUCATALOG LAW Publishing office for this catalog is the Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-1000. Copies of this catalog may be obtained from—and change of address, undeliverable copies, and other mail sent to—Paul M. Hebert Law Center, LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-1000.The LSU Law Catalog represents a flexible pro- gram of the current educational plans, offerings, and requirements that may be altered from time to time to carry out the purposes and objectives of the LSU Law Center.The provisions of this catalog do not constitute an offer for a contract that may be accepted by students through registration and enrollment in the LSU Law Center.The LSU Law Center reserves the right to change any provision, offering, or requirement at any time within the student’s period of study.The LSU Law Center further reserves the right to require a student to withdraw from the LSU Law Center for cause at any time.The LSU Law Center assures equal opportunity for all qualified persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, physical or mental disability, marital status, sexual orientation, or veteran’s status in the admission to, participation in, and treatment or employment in the programs and activities that the LSU Law Center operates and sponsors.The LSU Law Center does not discriminate against persons with disabilities in its program of legal education. Full opportunities are provided for the study of law and entry into the profession by qualified disabled persons.Anyone having questions or complaints regarding equal opportunity at the LSU Law Center should contact the Office of Equal Opportunity Programs, 318 Thomas Boyd Hall, LSU, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, 225/578-8200.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Catalog
    2013 CATALOG The Center for American and International Law 5201 Democracy Drive • Plano, Texas 75024 USA Voice: 972-244-3400 • Toll-free in USA: 800-409-1090 • Fax: 972-244-3401 www.cailaw.org 1 Introduction The Center for American and International Law mercial topics. Lecturers are drawn both from will hold the 50th session of the Academy of the academic community and from private law American and International Law from May 19 practice. Participants attend lectures, take part through June 28, 2013. This program is for law- in classroom exercises and work through a mock yers and judges from countries other than the legal problem. United States interested in American law and In 2012, the Academy hosted 68 participants from international business transactions. 30 nations. The 49 annual Academies have at- Who should attend? The Academy is particu- tracted participants from 120 countries, including larly valuable for non-U.S. lawyers who work attorneys, judges, law professors, and government for multi-national corporations or for law officials. firms that represent either U.S. clients or multi-national clients with U.S. interests. It Academy Fellows and LL.M. Credit: is not intended for the highly experienced interna- . Each Academy participant may earn a Certifi- tional lawyer. cate of Participation by attending class each The Academy has attracted many lawyers who day. A second certificate, designating the par- have gone on to very prominent positions in their ticipant as an Academy Fellow, may be earned home countries. It provides a forum for those who by taking and passing a series of short exams are among the “best and brightest,” giving them during the Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It Possible to Prevent Or Punish Future Aggressive War-Making?
    Is it Possible to Prevent or Punish Future Aggressive War‐making? Address by Judge Dr. jur. h. c. Hans‐Peter Kaul Second Vice‐President of the International Criminal Court At the Li Haopei Lecture Series “Implications of the Criminalization of Aggression” 8 February 2011 Forum for International Criminal and Humanitarian Law Oslo, Norway Check against delivery – embargoed until 8 February 2011, at 14h00. Let me begin with a question, a question of some importance. Is it the natural right, the inherent right of States to make war? Is war-making a national right? When we look at the reality of today’s world, it seems quite obvious that certain States, powerful States, continue to reserve for them, openly or more discreetly, also as some kind of hidden agenda, the option to go to war for their interests. The question, however, is crucial: Is it the natural, the inherent right of States or governments to use military force against other States when they believe it is in their interest? This is the fundamental question which is at the centre of today’s lecture. As some may know, on 11 June 2010, something surprising, something unexpected happened: against all odds, against most expectations, the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court (ICC) held in Kampala, Uganda adopted a full and complete package proposal on the crime of aggression. The amendments to the Rome Statute contain a definition of the crime of aggression and set out the conditions under which the Court will have, from 2017 onwards, jurisdiction with regard to this crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications for Bing Ling 2021 2020 2018 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
    Publications for Bing Ling 2021 Beijing, China: Presentation. Ling, B. (2021). The New Contract Law in the Chinese Civil Ling, B. (2014). Rule of Law in Foreign Policy-making: Code. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 8, 1-77. <a China's Non-Appearance in the South China Sea Arbitration. href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxaa030">[More 9th Annual Conference of the European China Law Studies Information]</a> Association (ECLS) 2014: Making, Enforcing and Accessing 2020 the Law, Hong Kong: Presentation. Ling, B. (2014). The Development of Rule of Law in China Ling, B. (2020). Constitutional and Legal Framework of the under the Xi Jinping Administration (2012-14). Hong Kong National Security Law. Webinar on National Security Law of Hong Kong: Legal and Social Implications, Ling, B. (2014). The Limit of Cosmopolitanism: The Role of Sydney, NSW: Presentation. Comparative Contract Law in China's Reform of Contract Law. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law Ling, B. (2020). Dispute Settlement Mechanism of International Third Annual Conference 2014 - Stepping away from the State: Organisations: An Examination of the Jurisdiction of the Universality and Cosmopolitanism in International and International Court of Justice (in Chinese). China Law Review, Comparative Law, Cambridge, England: Presentation. 34(4), 2-11. Ling, B. (2020). Does NPC's National Security Legislation 2013 Conform with Article 159 of the Basic Law (in Chinese). Ming Ling, B. (2013). A Tale of Two Jurisdictions: China's State Pao Daily. Secret Law and Disclosure Rules on Cross-border Financial Ling, B. (2020). International Proceedings against China for Information. Shanghai Forum 2013, Shanghai, China: COVID-19 Compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican Judicial Modernization and Its Legacies to the People's Republic of China
    An Irresistible Inheritance: Republican Judicial Modernization and Its Legacies to the People’s Republic of China Glenn Tiffert, University of California, Berkeley Abstract Commentators have long treated the Republican and People’s Republic of China (PRC) judicial systems in nearly hermetic isolation from each other. Yet it is impossible to grasp fully the history of the PRC judicial system independent of its Republican heritage, and to decouple the two is therefore to foreclose critical avenues of understanding. As a step toward repairing that rupture, this paper specifies the configurations and distributions of courts, as well as the discourses of judicial malaise and reform that the Republican period deposited on the doorstep of the PRC. It establishes the necessary empirical foundation from which to appreciate the institutional deficits and imbalances, developmental dilemmas, and normative discourses that confronted Chinese Communist Party (CCP) judicial planners in 1949, and it equips the reader to understand the planners’ responses—not just through the lens of ideology but also as reasoned reactions to concrete, practical problems. Additionally, this paper suggests that memory of the Republican judicial system served as a repository of value from which to shape, assess, and comprehend law’s fate in the PRC. Keywords: Republican China, Chinese judicial system About the 1949 Chinese Revolution, the eminent PRC legal reformer and scholar Cai Dingjian1 once observed that if we had overthrown the old legal order generally, yet embraced the attitude that law could be inherited; if we had not criticized or scorned it all; if we had concretely analyzed specific laws, brought forward a series of legal concepts— such as justice, equality, impartiality, the authority of law, respect for law, honesty, keeping one’s word, and so on—and inherited concrete rules and procedures for resolving conflicts, then the construction of New China’s legal system would not have had such a low starting point, and perhaps would not have met such misfortune.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Expropriation and Nationalization Risk in China
    An Analysis of Expropriation and Nationalization Risk in China Lianlian Lint John R. Alisontt I. CHINA IN THE EMERGiNG GLOBAL ECONOMY ............................ 136 H. NATIONALIZATION, EXPROPRIATION, AND OTHER HOST-GOVERNMENT TAKINGS OF FOREIGN ASSETS ......................................... 138 . THE COMPENSATION STANDARD: FROM THE HULL RULE TO APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION AND PEIRHAPS BACK AGAIN ....................... 141 A. U.N. Documents and Their Interpretation .......................... 144 B. DecisionalAuthority ........................................ 147 C. Actual Claims-Settlement Practicesof Developing Countries ............... 152 D. Continued Vitality of the TraditionalStandard ........................ 154 IV. EXPROPRIATION RISK IN CHINA: THEORY, POLICY, LAW, AND PRACTICE ............................................. 159 A. Chinese Academic Theory ..................................... 160 1. The Debate on Legislative Immunity from Expropriation .............. 161 a. Sovereignty and Self-Restraint .......................... 161 b. The Right of Expropriation ............................ 162 C. China and the Third World ............................. 163 2. Academic Debate on Other Issues ........................... 163 a. The Nature of Property .............................. 164 b. A Question of Domestic or InternationalLaw? ................ 165 C. The NondiscriminationPrinciple ......................... 166 d. The Compensation Standard ........................... 167 B. China's Expressions of Government Policy .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Charting Socio-Legal Approaches to International Law in China: Taking the Interdisciplinary Study of International Law and History As an Example
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 9 No 1 January 2020 ISSN 2281-3993 www.richtmann.org . Research Article © 2020 Shisong Jiang. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Charting Socio-Legal Approaches to International Law in China: Taking the Interdisciplinary Study of International Law and History as an Example Shisong Jiang Institute of Law, Politics and Development, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Italy; Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Belgium Doi: 10.36941/ajis-2020-0001 Abstract The mainstream of international legal academia has started to address a distinctive fundamental question of whether international law is international in recent years, in which national differences in terms of the understandings of and approaches to international law have been (re)recognized and accentuated. Thanks to its increasing importance and influence in the international community, the ways in which China engages with a variety of international legal issues and topics have garnered more attention from the so-called western scholars. Meanwhile, Chinese international legal scholars have also committed to establishing a Chinese school of international law through which to intensively and comprehensively showcase its own characteristics in this regard. Against this backdrop, this article aims to unveil the underestimated part of its characteristics concerning the socio-legal scholarship in China’s international law research by taking the interdisciplinary study of international law and history as an example. To that end, this article first reviews the overall configuration of international law research in China and roughly summarizes the current “Chinese characteristics” as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The PLA and International Humanitarian Law: Achievements and Challenges
    The PLA and International Humanitarian Law: Achievements and Challenges Wang Wenjuan ASIA PAPER October 2013 The PLA and International Humanitarian Law: Achievements and Challenges Wang Wenjuan (Translated from Chinese by Kelly Chen) Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu The PLA and International Humanitarian Law: Achievements and Challenges is an Asia Paper published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Asia Pa- pers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Institute’s Asia Program, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. Through its Silk Road Studies Program, the In- stitute runs a joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center with the Central Asia-Cau- casus Institute of Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. The Institute is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and develop- ment. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Security and Development Policy or its sponsors. © Institute for Security and Development Policy, 2013 ISBN: 978-91-86635-66-4 Printed in Singapore Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • State Sovereignty and International Criminal Law Morten Bergsmo and LING Yan (Editors)
    State Sovereignty and International Criminal Law Morten Bergsmo and LING Yan (editors) PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/82ec96/ PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/82ec96/ State Sovereignty and International Criminal Law Morten Bergsmo and LING Yan (editors) 2012 Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher Beijing PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/82ec96/ This and other books in the FICHL Publication Series may be openly accessed and downloaded through the website www.fichl.org. This site uses Persistent URLs (PURL) for all publications it makes available. The URLs of these publications will not be changed. Printed copies may be ordered through online distributors such as www.amazon.co.uk. This book was first published on 19 November 2012. © Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2012 All rights are reserved. You may read, print or download this book or any part of it from www.fichl.org for personal use, but you may not in any way charge for its use by others, directly or by reproducing it, storing it in a retrieval system, transmitting it, or utilising it in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, in whole or in part, without the prior permission in writing of the copyright holder. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the copyright holder. You must not circulate this book in any other cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer. You must not make this book or any part of it available on the Internet by any other URL than that on www.fichl.org.
    [Show full text]