DOCSLIB.ORG

USAID Office of Transition Initiatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USAID Office of Transition Initiatives USAID Office of Transition Initiatives 2018 Ukraine Social Cohesion & Reconciliation Index (SCORE) What is SCORE? The SCORE Index is a research and analysis tool that helps policy makers and stakeholders in Ukraine understand political leanings, the drivers of conflict and social cohesion. It also helps identify potential threats to national unity and stability during Ukraine's democratic transition. SCORE was developed in 2012 by The Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development (SeeD) in partnership with UNDP and USAID. SCORE was conducted twice in Ukraine at a national level, in 2016 and in 2018. To date, SCORE has also been used in Cyprus, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Nepal, Liberia, Moldova and Iraq. 2016 2018 August 2015 and December 2016 November 2017 and March 2018 Overall Sample Size: 10, 278 Overall Sample Size: 10,060 Government Controlled Area (GCA): 9,337 Government Controlled Area2018 (GCA): - 9,018 Non-Government Controlled Area (NGCA) Luhansk and Donetsk: 941 Non-Government Controlled Area (NGCA) Luhansk and Donetsk: 1,042 Interpreting SCORE: SCORE findings are presented as a series of indicators. Each indicator measures a particular phenomenon (e.g. economic security, social tolerance, support for reform or policies) and is derived from at least 3 questionnaire items. The scores are not percentages; they are composite index values that represent the intensity of a particular indicator as measured through a number of related questions. How to Read Heat Maps 2018 OBLAST-LEVEL SCORE Each oblast is shaded by color with the 2018 value according to the scale below: Chernihiv 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sumy CHANGE IN OBLAST SCORE Kyiv # City BETWEEN 2016 & 2018 The value in each circle denotes the change in value from 2016 to 2018 Kyiv Poltava Decrease -1.0 - If the value has decreased since 2016, Cherkasy the change is shown as negative Increase Kirovohrad + If the value has increased since 2016, +1.0 the change is shown as positive 1 Methodology The SCORE Index is based on a participatory research methodology where multilevel stakeholder consultations, focus groups and interviews are conducted to inform the calibration of a national survey. Once experts conduct a preliminary analysis of the data collected, SCORE results are further refined via stakeholder consultations and dialogue groups, which inform the formation of indices and policy briefs. Government Controlled Non-Government 2018 Demographics Areas (GCA) Controlled Areas (NGCA) Information is broken Men 45% Women 55% 30-39 18-29 30-39 18-29 Men 45% Women 55% down by demographics 21% 16% 22% 14% including age, gender and 60+ 40-49 Age 60+ Rural Urban Age settlement, which helps Rural Urban 17% 29% 40-49 23% target activity beneficiaries 50-59 35% 21% 50-59 65% 4% to maximize efficiency of 17% 20% 96% program resources. GCA: N = 9,018 NGCA: N = 1,042 Groups and Their Characteristics NORTH 0 20 40 60 80 100 % Polarized Pro-EU In order to identify ‘16 Tolerant Reformer potential changemakers in Disconnected WEST ‘18 Tolerant Traditionalist society, SCORE examined 0 20 40 60 80 100 % Polarized Pro-Russia* various civic and political ‘16 Hostile attitudes of Ukrainian ‘18 CENTER citizens and identified five 0 20 40 60 80 100 % different groups. EAST ‘16 0 20 40 60 80 100 % ‘18 ‘16 Change in Distribution ‘18 of Groups SOUTH 0 20 40 60 80 100 % 2016 ‘16 45% 2018 35% ‘18 31% 19% 15% 15% 15% 15% 7% 2% *Polarized Pro-Russia category only Polarized Tolerant Disconnected Tolerant Polarized Hostile Pro-EU Reformer Traditionalist Pro-Russia* present in 2016 Polarized Pro-EU Tolerant Reformer Disconnected Tolerant Traditionalist Hostile This group strongly supports a This group supports This group is increasingly This group tends to be This group is hostile toward European future for Ukraine, change and reform for disenfranchised by politics older and nostalgic for Russia, the West and Ukraine. but does not embrace many Ukraine and embraces and is economically insecure. Soviet times, but is They are intolerant and open democratic values, such as values such as social Many from this group were tolerant and open to to political violence. pluralism. They are strongly cohesion and diversity. previously strongly aligned dialogue about the future nationalistic and more open to toward Russia. of Ukraine. political violence. 2 FOSTERING CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP AND UNIFYING NATIONAL VISIONS SCORE measured the prevalence of constructive, democratic civic values such as social tolerance, civic engagement and readiness for compromise among the Ukrainian population. TOP RECOMMENDATIONS & TAKEAWAYS Geopolitical leanings are becoming less important. Most Ukrainians support some ties with Russia and the EU. In eastern Ukraine there is some support for the EU, while western Ukraine is more skeptical of relations with Russia. The community of tolerant reformers is growing in the east and south of Ukraine. However, many Ukrainians with any Russian political and cultural sentiments do not feel free to voice their political opinions, leading to disengagement by a significant portion of the population. Support for a pluralistic Ukrainian identity is strong in the east and south, but Ukrainian identity is understood based more on ethnicity in the west. There is an opportunity to build unity around a vision for Ukraine that emphasizes core Western values such as civic engagement, good governance, and human rights. CHANGES SINCE 2016 + What Improved What Stayed The Same - What Got Worse Growing civic optimism A concerning readiness for violence Increase in tolerance for corruption Higher support for a pluralistic Very low civic engagement Decrease in perceived benefit from Ukrainian identity, particularly in the Somewhat low social tolerance, the EU and increased skepticism about east and south particularly in the northwest the EU’s stability National SOCIAL TOLERANCE Average The degree to which one accepts 2016 2018 Volyn different groups, backgrounds and 4.5 4.8 Chernihiv -1.6 Rivne identities within their communities. Sumy -0.6 Zhytomyr Kyiv City +1.9 Lviv +1.4 Kyiv Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Poltava +1.6 Kharkiv -0.5 Cherkasy +0.9 Luhansk Vinnytsia +0.9 ZakarpattyaIvano-Frankivsk +0.5 Donetsk +2.7 +1.0 Chernivtsi NGCA Kirovohrad Dnipropetrovsk Luhansk -2.2 -0.8 NGCA Donetsk 2018 OBLAST LEVEL SCORES Mykolayiv Zaporizhzhia 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Odesa +0.5 +0.6 Kherson No Social Very High +1.4 Tolerance Social Tolerance *Colors show the overall level of social tolerance; numbers represent changes CHANGE IN OBLAST SCORE since 2016. BETWEEN 2016 & 2018 Decrease - Increase + 3 Maps and Graphics Continued PRO-EU ORIENTATION The degree to which one supports EU National Volyn Average integration and NATO membership, and +0.5 Rivne would vote positively in a potential EU 2016 2018 Chernihiv Sumy accession referendum. 6.5 5.9 -0.6 Zhytomyr Kyiv City -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 Lviv Kyiv Ternopil Khmelnytskyi -1.3 Poltava Kharkiv -0.8 Luhansk Ivano- Vinnytsia Cherkasy Frankivsk Zakarpattya -1.3 -2.3 Donetsk +1.8 Chernivtsi Kirovohrad Dnipropetrovsk -1.4 -0.7 2018 OBLAST LEVEL SCORES Mykolayiv 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Odesa Zaporizhzhia -0.5 Kherson No Pro-EU Very High Pro-EU Orientation Orientation *Colors show the overall level of pro-EU orientation; numbers represent changes since 2016. SOVIET NOSTALGIA National Volyn The extent to which one regrets the Average collapse of the Soviet Union and believes -1.9 Rivne Chernihiv 2016 2018 -1.0 Sumy that life was better before 1991. 5.8 5.5 Zhytomyr Kyiv City -0.5 -0.7 Lviv -0.9 Kyiv Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Poltava Kharkiv Luhansk Ivano- Vinnytsia Frankivsk Cherkasy Zakarpattya +0.9 +0.8 -0.7 Dnipropetrovsk Donetsk Chernivtsi Kirovohrad -0.5 -1.1 2018 OBLAST LEVEL SCORES Mykolayiv Zaporizhzhia 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Odesa -0.8 Kherson No Soviet Very High -1.2 Nostalgia Soviet Nostalgia *Colors show the overall level of soviet nostalgia; numbers represent changes since 2016. 4 SUPPORT FOR THE REFORM PROCESS SCORE identified and measured the drivers and strategic entry points for improving public support for Ukraine’s ambitious reform process. TOP RECOMMENDATIONS & TAKEAWAYS Support for all reforms, with the exception of privatization (while very low), is declining. People are most skeptical of “pocket book reforms” such as pensions, healthcare and utilities. Corruption remains a key grievance of the public, but support for anti-corruption reform is waning as people lose hope in the possibility of progress. There is a correlation between economic security and reforms (i.e. people expect the reform process to lead to tangible improvements in their quality of life). Strengthening civic values has a positive impact on perception of reforms. CHANGES SINCE 2016 + What Improved What Stayed The Same - What Got Worse Increased feelings of economic, human Low trust in local and national Decreased support for decentralization, and personal security in most oblasts authorities, security services and deregulation and anti-corruption reforms media institutions Improved perceptions of infrastructure Significant increase in tolerance to and state services Low support for privatization reform corruption OVERALL SUPPORT National Volyn FOR REFORMS Average Rivne Chernihiv The level of support for various 7.2 government reforms: decentralization, Kyiv Sumy privatization, pension, education, Zhytomyr City health and anti-corruption. Lviv Kyiv Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Poltava Kharkiv Luhansk Cherkasy Ivano-Frankivsk Vinnytsia Zakarpattya Donetsk Chernivtsi Kirovohrad Dnipropetrovsk Mykolayiv Zaporizhzhia Odesa 2018 OBLAST LEVEL SCORES Kherson 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No Support Very High Support *Colors show the overall level of for Reforms for Reforms support for reforms; overall support for reforms was not measured in 2016. 5 Maps and Graphics Continued I SUPPORT FOR PRIVATIZATION REFORM The degree to which one supports National Volyn Average privatization reform.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local and Regional Government in Ukraine and the Development of Cooperation Between Ukraine and the EU
    Local and regional government in Ukraine and the development of cooperation between Ukraine and the EU The report was written by the Aston Centre for Europe - Aston University. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available on the internet at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-31-12-226-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-895-0627-4 DOI: 10.2863/59575 © European Union, 2011 Partial reproduction is allowed, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned Table of Contents 1 PART ONE .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of local and regional government in Ukraine ................................ 3 1.3 Ukraine’s constitutional/legal frameworks for local and regional government 7 1.4 Competences of local and regional authorities............................................... 9 1.5 Electoral democracy at the local and regional level .....................................11 1.6 The extent and nature of fiscal decentralisation in Ukraine .........................15 1.7 The extent and nature of territorial reform ...................................................19 1.8 The politics of Ukrainian administrative reform plans.................................21 1.8.1 Position of ruling government ..................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • UKRAINE the Constitution and Other Laws and Policies Protect Religious
    UKRAINE The constitution and other laws and policies protect religious freedom and, in practice, the government generally enforced these protections. The government generally respected religious freedom in law and in practice. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period. Local officials at times took sides in disputes between religious organizations, and property restitution problems remained; however, the government continued to facilitate the return of some communal properties. There were reports of societal abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. These included cases of anti-Semitism and anti- Muslim discrimination as well as discrimination against different Christian denominations in different parts of the country and vandalism of religious property. Various religious organizations continued their work to draw the government's attention to their issues, resolve differences between various denominations, and discuss relevant legislation. The U.S. government discusses religious freedom with the government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. U.S. embassy representatives raised these concerns with government officials and promoted ethnic and religious tolerance through public outreach events. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 233,000 square miles and a population of 45.4 million. The government estimates that there are 33,000 religious organizations representing 55 denominations in the country. According to official government sources, Orthodox Christian organizations make up 52 percent of the country's religious groups. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church Moscow Patriarchate (abbreviated as UOC-MP) is the largest group, with significant presence in all regions of the country except for the Ivano-Frankivsk, Lviv, and Ternopil oblasts (regions).
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Practices and the Making of National Identity in Post-Soviet Ukraine
    EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES AND THE MAKING OF NATIONAL IDENTITY IN POST-SOVIET UKRAINE Cathy Wanner Columbia University It's the direction given by education to unify a highly diverse and disaffected population. that is likely to determine A vast state-sponsored effort to Ukrainianize public all that follows. education reveals the state's version of what it means Plato, The Republic to be Ukrainian in post-Soviet society. Redefining an inclusivist Ukrainian nation, encompassing the Schools are vitally important in the transmission and sizable Russian and Russified Ukrainian populations, dissemination of historical memories, myths, and is crucial for the viability of a weak Ukrainian state. symbols, all of which foster a sense of nation-ness. The cultural knowledge schools transmit is a critical Concerned about the fragility of the new Ukrainian factor in formulating identity and crystallizing state, a small group of Ukrainian educators scattered membership in a particular generation. By targeting across the country have joined state-sponsored efforts education for reform, political leaders capitalize on at nation-building by creating elite schools. An the potential to incorporate into the very experience independent Ukrainian state is best secured, they and memory of the first post-Soviet generation reason, by a strong, culturally unified nation and a elements of Ukrainian culture, language, and nation cannot exist without a cultural elite. The historical memory to naturalize a Ukrainian identity founders and faculty of these schools see their among children of Russian-speaking families. mission as the reestablishment of a Ukrainian national elite and a reintroduction of the societal As Ernest Gellner (1983) and others have pointed divisions based on national, religious, class and out, the structural requirements of a modern gender distinctions that the Soviet system, in an effort industrial economy mandate that workers be mobile to forge a supraethnic Soviet identity, sought to erase.
    [Show full text]
  • One Ukraine Or Many? Regionalism in Ukraine and Its Political Consequences
    Nationalities Papers, Vol. 32, No. 1, March 2004 One Ukraine or Many? Regionalism in Ukraine and Its Political Consequences Lowell W. Barrington & Erik S. Herron Intra-state regional differences are a central topic in the study of European and Eurasian politics. In Ukraine, regional differences have proven to be powerful predictors of mass attitudes and political behavior. But what does the “regional factor” in Ukrainian politics represent? Is it simply the result of compositional effects, or are the regional differences more than just a sum of other demographic factors correlated with geographic divisions? When analyzing regional divisions as an explanatory variable, what are the implications of employing different regional frameworks? In this article, we demonstrate how geographic divisions in the country hold up even when others factors—such as ethnicity and language use—are con- trolled for. As part of this inquiry, we compare the results of three competing regional frameworks for Ukraine: one with two regions, one with four regions and one with eight regions. While the eight-region framework is uncommon in studies of Ukraine, the decision to examine eight regions is supported by historical, economic and demographic arguments, as well as by the results of the statistical analyses presented in this article. Scholars who have focused on fewer regions in Ukraine may have underestimated the effects of regional differences and missed interesting stories about intra-state variation in Ukrainian attitudes and voting behavior. The results of this study carry important implications not only for the study of Ukraine but also for those interested in intra-state regional divisions across Europe and Eurasia.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Khmelnytskyi Investment Profile
    Khmelnytskyi Investment Profile 2019 Table of Contents About Khmelnytskyi Economics and Key Sectors Business Environment Why Khmelnytskyi? Infrastructure Trade and Services Doing Business Summary Economic Data Garment Industry Industrial Park Key Facts Railway Transport Food Processing Local Taxes and Fees Geopolitical Profile Road Transport Construction Trading and Office of the City Centers Municipal Public Industries and Logistics Transport Event and Exhibition BPO / SSC / IT sector Facilities Investments Success Stories Standard of Living Labour Market Other Relevant in Khmelnytskyi and Education Information Quality of Life Labour Market Interesting Facts Municipal Services Education about Khmelnytskyi Annual Key Events Transportation Universities in Khmelnytskyi Cost of Living Achievements Municipal Institutions 2 3 About Khmelnytskyi Photo: Oleksandr Savenko Why Khmelnytskyi? Strategic Qualified The most The largest Vivid geographical labour force affordable trading center cultural location housing in Western life market Ukraine 6 7 Summary Key Facts Transit Routs Area Khmelnytskyi is a marketplace for innovation and opportunity. The city is one of the best Time zone UTC +2 Gdansk places for doing business in Ukraine, which has Climate Temperate continental dynamic development, progressive views and Accessibility By train — from Poland, Slovakia, the safest city foresight of its residents. According to Focus Kyiv Romania, Bulgaria and Russia. in Ukraine Rava-Ruska magazine Khmelnytskyi was recognized as one Lviv By bus — from more than 100 Pshemysl of the most comfortable cities in Ukraine – it got European cities. second place (after Kyiv) and was ranked first in the Transparency and financial health of cities Population (2019) 273,700 Kropyvnytskyi Dnipro Chop and regions in Ukraine survey conducted by the The average monthly gross ₴ 8,513 / € 288 Chernivtsi International Center for Policy Studies in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMP Conference 2019 Session E4 Urban Mobility Planning and Projects in Ukraine Support Through EIB, GIZ and Other Partners
    SUMP conference 2019 Session E4 Urban Mobility Planning and projects in Ukraine Support through EIB, GIZ and other partners J.Schneider, S. Böhler Baedeker Groningen 18.6.2019 The approach National Urban Public Transport programme for municipalities (UPT) • Rolling Stock replacement or rehabilitation of cities’ public transport fleets such as trams, trolleybuses, metro wagons or electric buses • Infrastructure improvements, which are essential for fleet modernisation support. UPT is implemented by the Government of Ukraine, acting through the Ministry of Infrastructure (MoI). The final beneficiaries will be transport utilities owned by municipalities or the municipalities themselves. Programme will be co-financed with EBRD targeting complementary schemes within the same cities or any other cities to ensure a 50% financing limit on a portfolio basis. Cities included are Chernihiv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Kharkiv, Kiev, Lutsk, Lviv, Mykolaev, Odessa, Sumy, Ternopil, and Zaporizhya UPT projects will be prepared on the basis of an EU funded TA program. Informal coordination with TA issued by GIZ takes place. 2 • Chernihiv (EIB/P), • Ivano-Frankivsk (EIB), • Kharkiv (EIB/P) , • Kiev (EIB/P/GIZ SUMP), • Lutsk (EIB/P), • Lviv (EIB), • Mykolaev (EIB/P), • Odessa (EIB/P), • Poltawa (GIZ SUMP) • Sumy (EIB/P), • Ternopil (EIB/P), • Zaporizhya (EIB/P) • Zytomyr (GIZ SUMP) 3 The EIB TA program In 8 cities (Chernihiv, Kiev, Lutsk, Odessa, Sumy, Ternopil, Zaporizhya and Kharkiv) the preparation of projects is supported by technical assistance (Municipal Project
    [Show full text]
  • Rivne, Ivano-Frankivsk and Ternopil Oblasts
    THE CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME POLAND-BELARUS-UKRAINE 2007-2013 RIVNE, IVANO-FRANKIVSK AND TERNOPIL OBLASTS REGIONAL HANDBOOK European Union Cross-border Cooperation Programme Poland - Belarus - Ukraine 2007-2013 1 2 Cover photograph: Serhiy Neupokoyev CONTENT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP MAP 8 PROJECTS REGIONAL RESULTS 9 INTRODUCTION TO THE REGIONS 10 IPBU.03.01.00-06-470/11 15 Investment in culture. Comprehensive action for cultural education IPBU.03.01.00-90-701/11 18 Student with initiative: vector of energy saving IPBU.01.01.00-88-784/11 20 Development of small and medium entrepreneurship in Rivne and Lublin PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED IN THE REGIONS 22 Data in the publication as of the second half of 2014 3 Dear Reader, It has been 10 years since Poland joined the European Union. As a result, the Polish Eastern border also became an external border of the EU. European Neighbourhood Policy instruments were made available to develop cross-border cooperation with the Eastern neighbours based on common values and goals. Building a zone of sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity and tolerance became a joint priority for the border regions of Poland, Belarus and Ukraine. The border regions gained a great opportunity to strengthen their cooperation through the realisation of com- mon projects within the ENPI CBC Programme Poland-Bela- rus-Ukraine 2007-2013. I am proud to present a series of publications reflecting how the regions from the eligible area of the Programme ap- proached cross-border cooperation and what specific pro- jects are being implemented on their territories to improve development processes.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Bank
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: 84065-UA INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$300 MILLION AND A PROPOSED CLEAN TECHNOLOGY FUND LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$50.00 MILLION TO UKRAINE FOR A SECOND URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT Sustainable Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 16, 2014) Currency Unit = UAH 8.34 UAH = US$1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADSCR Annual Debt Service Coverage Ratio KfW Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau ACS Automatic Calling System Minregion Ministry of Regional Development, Construction, Housing and Communal Services BOD Biological Oxygen Demand MoE Ministry of Economic Development and Trade CO2eq CO2 equivalent MoF Ministry of Finance CPMU Central Project Management Unit MWH Megawatt Hours CPS Country Partnership Strategy NPV Net Present Value CSO Civil Society Organization NRW Non-Revenue Water CTF Clean Technology Fund O&M Operations and Maintenance DB Design-Build OCCR Operating Cost Coverage Ratio EBITDA ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and PAP Project Affected Persons Development EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return P-RAMS Procurement Risk Assessment Module
    [Show full text]
  • Kyiv Kyiv Lviv Lviv ... Kyiv Kyiv Sumy ... Kyiv Zaporizhia Ternopil Kyiv
    Rank University Town 1 National Technical University of Ukraine Kyiv Polytechnic Institute Kyiv 2 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Kyiv 3 Ivan Franko National University of Lviv Lviv 4 Lviv Polytechnic National University Lviv ... 5 Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Kyiv 6 National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Kyiv 7 Sumy State University Sumy ... 8 National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Kyiv 9 Zaporizhzhya National University Zaporizhia 10 Ternopil State Medical University Ternopil 11 National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Kyiv 12 O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv Kharkiv ... 13 V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Simferopol 14 National Mining University Dnipro ... 15 V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Kharkiv 16 Vinnytsia National Technical University Vinnytsia 17 National University of Pharmacy Kharkiv 18 National Aviation University Kyiv ... 19 Odessa National University Odesa ... 20 Melitopol State Pedagogical University Melitopol 21 National University of Food Technologies Kyiv 22 Uman State Pedagogical University Uman 23 National Technical University Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute Kharkiv ... 24 Ternopil National Economic University Ternopil 25 Tavria State Agrotechnological University Melitopol 26 Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Kharkiv 27 Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University Kremenchuk 28 Bukovinian State Medical University Chernivtsi 29 National University of Ostroh Academy Ostroh 30 Dnipropetrovsk National University
    [Show full text]