Rte5$ from Tbe Jlta 3Aoms
84 lf}ebigrte5$ from tbe Jlta 3aoms. By Major-General the Hon. GEORGE WROTTESLEY. (Ountint1ed from Yul. Xll, p. 233.) o« Banco. Micli. 3. Ric. 2. m. 647. Saf11p.-Ralph Lyngeyn, Kt., and Marjory, his wife, and Laurence Hau• berk and Margaret, his wife, sued Richard, Earl of Arundel, for the manor of Bukenhulle, Roger de Cheyne,,=Margery. living 2 E. 3. I Roger==Iaolde. I r----------..L---, Marjory.=Ralph Lyngeyn, Kt. Ma.rgaret.=Laurence Hauberk. De Banco. Jfich. 3. Ilic. 2. m. 562. De1·b.-John de Holand sued Thomas de Longford for the manor of Wykesworth. Robert de Holand.q-Matilda, r----· ..i..I -, Alan, ob. s.p. Hobert, I John de Roland, the plain tiff, Thomas de Longford culled to warranty John Lovel, Kt., and Matilda, his wife. De Banco, Mich. 3. Ric. 2. m. 183. Northampton.-John de Elyngham and Joan, his wife, sued John de Knyghton for the manor of Ryshton. John de Lacy, Kt. r--·----,---,--..t.,-----,---,I William, living Edmund, John, Henry, Edward, Isabella. 7 E. 2, ob, s.p. ob. s.p, ob. s.p. uu. s.p. I I Robert. Amia, I I Joan. =John de Thomas, Elyngham plaintiffs. De Banco. l{ich. 3. Ric. 2. m. 261. Salop.-William de 'I'hornhull and Florence, his wife, sued John de Whitewalle for the manor of Burwarton near Le Cleo, and they sued John de Hopton, Kt., for a moiety of tho manor of Fittos, which 'I'homus · de Constantyne had given to Adam de Montgomery und Isabella, his wife, temp. Ed. 1.
[Show full text]