Charcoal Value Chain Analysis Within the Region Helps Identify the Main Actors and Understand Their Roles and Main Activities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charcoal Value Chain Analysis Within the Region Helps Identify the Main Actors and Understand Their Roles and Main Activities Ministry of Environment, Water and Natural Resources ANALYSIS OF THE CHARCOAL VALUE CHAIN IN KENYA FINAL REPORT | AUGUST2013 Copyright © 2013 This report was commissioned by the Kenya Forest Service (KFS), Coordinated by the National REDD+ Coordinating Office (NRCO) and carried out by Camco Advisory Services (Kenya) Limited. Appreciation goes to all the respondents interviewed in Nairobi, Kwale/Lunga Lunga, Kitui/Mutomo, Baringo and Kajiado as well as the KFS team at Karura and Ecosystem Managers in the 24 counties where charcoal data was available for providing useful charcoal and forestry data. The charcoal producers, transporters and dealers were especially useful in understanding the charcoal value chain including the challenges faced by various actors along the chain. ii Analysis of the Charcoal Value Chain in Kenya iii Analysis of the Charcoal Value Chain in Kenya Document type: Final Consultancy Report Client: Kenya Forest Service Client contact: Alfred Gichu Other details: National REDD+ Coordinator Date: iv Analysis of the Charcoal Value Chain in Kenya Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ v List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... viii List of Tables and Figures ......................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... xi 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Summary of the Approach and Methods ............................................................................ 1 1.3 Background ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Charcoal in the Kenyan Economy ............................................................................ 3 1.3.2 Charcoal Consumption.............................................................................................. 3 1.3.3 Charcoal Supply ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3.4 Raw Materials for Charcoal Production ................................................................... 5 1.3.5 Charcoal and Deforestation/Forest Degradation ....................................................... 5 1.4 The Charcoal Value Chain ............................................................................................... 6 1.4.1 Stakeholders along the Charcoal Value Chain.......................................................... 6 1.4.2 Charcoal Production technologies ............................................................................ 7 1.4.3 Charcoal Marketing ................................................................................................ 12 1.4.4 Taxation and Other Fiscal Measures Relevant to Charcoal .................................... 12 1.5 Comparative Analysis of Regional Charcoal Production Systems and Value Chains ..............13 2 Policies and Legislative Frameworks ............................................................................................. 15 2.1 Energy Act and Policy ...................................................................................................15 2.1.1 Revisions to the Energy Policy (2012) ................................................................... 15 2.2 The Forests Act (2005) and Draft Forest Policy (2007) ......................................................16 2.2.1 A Policy Response to the “Charcoal Problem”....................................................... 16 2.3 The Constitution of Kenya (2010) ...................................................................................17 2.4 Other Policies and legislative Frameworks Relevant to the Charcoal Industry .......................17 2.5 National Development Plans ...........................................................................................18 2.5.1 Vision 2030 – Long-term and Medium Term Plan ................................................. 18 2.6 Overview of specific projects, plans and programmes relevant to charcoal ...........................19 2.6.1 The Kenya Charcoal Policy Handbook................................................................... 19 2.7 Synergies and conflicts between existing plans, development policies and legislation and charcoal production ..................................................................................................................19 3 The Charcoal Value Chain .............................................................................................................. 21 v Analysis of the Charcoal Value Chain in Kenya 3.1 Overview .....................................................................................................................21 3.1.1 Charcoal production ................................................................................................ 21 3.1.2 Transportation and Marketing................................................................................. 27 3.1.3 Charcoal consumption ............................................................................................ 30 3.1.4 Briquette production from charcoal dust ................................................................ 32 3.2 Key Actors and practices along the charcoal value chain ....................................................33 3.2.1 Wood Production .................................................................................................... 34 3.2.2 Charcoal producers ................................................................................................. 35 3.2.3 Charcoal Transporters ............................................................................................. 38 3.2.4 Charcoal Vendors: Wholesalers and Retailers ........................................................ 40 3.2.5 Charcoal consumers ................................................................................................ 40 4 Economic Analysis of the Charcoal Value Chain .......................................................................... 42 4.1 Charcoal production Channels ........................................................................................42 4.2 Analysis of Selected Value Chains ..................................................................................48 4.2.1 Kajiado Value Chain ............................................................................................... 48 4.2.2 Baringo Value Chain............................................................................................... 49 4.3 Economic Analysis of the Charcoal Value Chains .............................................................49 4.3.1 Distribution of income along the value chain ......................................................... 51 4.3.1 Market Response to Charcoal Pricing ..................................................................... 52 The conclusion is that there is very limited market response to charcoal prices as it is entirely in under the control of the cartels. ........................................................................... 53 Main Challenges along the value chains ............................................................................... 53 5 Mapping Charcoal Hotspots ........................................................................................................... 56 5.1 Identification and Analysis of Hotspots ............................................................................56 6 Selected Case Studies ....................................................................................................................... 60 6.1 Charcoal Production by CPAs in Kwale County ................................................................60 6.2 Charcoal production by CPAs in Kitui Zone within Kitui County ........................................61 6.3 Documentation of illegal payments during charcoal transportation from Namanga to Nairobi .62 6.4 Charcoal import and export ............................................................................................65 7 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................... 66 7.1 Conclusions ................................................................................................................66 7.2 Recommendations ......................................................................................................68 7.2.1 General Recommendations ..................................................................................... 68 7.2.1 Specific Recommendations to Strengthen the Value Chain ................................... 69 vi Analysis of the Charcoal Value Chain in Kenya 8 References .......................................................................................................................................... 70 9 Annexes .............................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • County Urban Governance Tools
    County Urban Governance Tools This map shows various governance and management approaches counties are using in urban areas Mandera P Turkana Marsabit P West Pokot Wajir ish Elgeyo Samburu Marakwet Busia Trans Nzoia P P Isiolo P tax Bungoma LUFs P Busia Kakamega Baringo Kakamega Uasin P Gishu LUFs Nandi Laikipia Siaya tax P P P Vihiga Meru P Kisumu ga P Nakuru P LUFs LUFs Nyandarua Tharaka Garissa Kericho LUFs Nithi LUFs Nyeri Kirinyaga LUFs Homa Bay Nyamira P Kisii P Muranga Bomet Embu Migori LUFs P Kiambu Nairobi P Narok LUFs P LUFs Kitui Machakos Kisii Tana River Nyamira Makueni Lamu Nairobi P LUFs tax P Kajiado KEY County Budget and Economic Forums (CBEFs) They are meant to serve as the primary institution for ensuring public participation in public finances in order to im- Mom- prove accountability and public participation at the county level. basa Baringo County, Bomet County, Bungoma County, Busia County,Embu County, Elgeyo/ Marakwet County, Homabay County, Kajiado County, Kakamega County, Kericho Count, Kiambu County, Kilifi County, Kirin- yaga County, Kisii County, Kisumu County, Kitui County, Kwale County, Laikipia County, Machakos Coun- LUFs ty, Makueni County, Meru County, Mombasa County, Murang’a County, Nairobi County, Nakuru County, Kilifi Nandi County, Nyandarua County, Nyeri County, Samburu County, Siaya County, TaitaTaveta County, Taita Taveta TharakaNithi County, Trans Nzoia County, Uasin Gishu County Youth Empowerment Programs in urban areas In collaboration with the national government, county governments unveiled
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya, Groundwater Governance Case Study
    WaterWater Papers Papers Public Disclosure Authorized June 2011 Public Disclosure Authorized KENYA GROUNDWATER GOVERNANCE CASE STUDY Public Disclosure Authorized Albert Mumma, Michael Lane, Edward Kairu, Albert Tuinhof, and Rafik Hirji Public Disclosure Authorized Water Papers are published by the Water Unit, Transport, Water and ICT Department, Sustainable Development Vice Presidency. Water Papers are available on-line at www.worldbank.org/water. Comments should be e-mailed to the authors. Kenya, Groundwater Governance case study TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................................. vi ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................ xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... xiv 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. GROUNDWATER: A COMMON RESOURCE POOL ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2. CASE STUDY BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONFLICT SNAPSHOT Kenya December 2020 Introduction
    Funded by the European Union CONFLICT SNAPSHOT Kenya December 2020 Introduction Kenya is a large culturally and ethnic diverse country, with over 40 different ethnic groups and numerous superimposed conflicts. Ethnic tensions and clashes coupled with political instability that manifests during the election period have been on the rise in the recent past. Recurrent drought that pushes herders into farmlands in search of pasture has led to violent clashes between herders and farmers in Garissa and Tana River counties. Ethnic group affiliation and highly centralised ethnopolitics are the primary identity of many Kenyans, especially during periods of turmoil. According to the Conflict Analysis of Kenya report, Kenyan Muslims have been marginalised within the Kenyan state and feel like they are treated as second-rate citizens. Data collection and analysis Data for the conflict snapshot COVID-19 series in Kenya was airoi gathered from 21-25 September in the following target zones: arissa This coincided with a period of relative calm in terms of ana iver COVID-19 caseloads and containment measures in Kenya, Kilifi as it fell in between the first and second wave of outbreaks omasa and many people believed there would soon be a return to normalcy. This perception may have influenced certain survey wale responses and we expect to see changes in this in the next round of snapshot reports. This report was prepared by the Search for Common Ground Kenya team, with support from Search’s COVID-19 Response Programming Team and Institutional Learning Team. For more information on the data collection methodology and tools used by Search for Common Ground for this research, click here.
    [Show full text]
  • County Name County Code Location
    COUNTY NAME COUNTY CODE LOCATION MOMBASA COUNTY 001 BANDARI COLLEGE KWALE COUNTY 002 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT MATUGA KILIFI COUNTY 003 PWANI UNIVERSITY TANA RIVER COUNTY 004 MAU MAU MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL LAMU COUNTY 005 LAMU FORT HALL TAITA TAVETA 006 TAITA ACADEMY GARISSA COUNTY 007 KENYA NATIONAL LIBRARY WAJIR COUNTY 008 RED CROSS HALL MANDERA COUNTY 009 MANDERA ARIDLANDS MARSABIT COUNTY 010 ST. STEPHENS TRAINING CENTRE ISIOLO COUNTY 011 CATHOLIC MISSION HALL, ISIOLO MERU COUNTY 012 MERU SCHOOL THARAKA-NITHI 013 CHIAKARIGA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL EMBU COUNTY 014 KANGARU GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KITUI COUNTY 015 MULTIPURPOSE HALL KITUI MACHAKOS COUNTY 016 MACHAKOS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE MAKUENI COUNTY 017 WOTE TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE NYANDARUA COUNTY 018 ACK CHURCH HALL, OL KALAU TOWN NYERI COUNTY 019 NYERI PRIMARY SCHOOL KIRINYAGA COUNTY 020 ST.MICHAEL GIRLS BOARDING MURANGA COUNTY 021 MURANG'A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KIAMBU COUNTY 022 KIAMBU INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY TURKANA COUNTY 023 LODWAR YOUTH POLYTECHNIC WEST POKOT COUNTY 024 MTELO HALL KAPENGURIA SAMBURU COUNTY 025 ALLAMANO HALL PASTORAL CENTRE, MARALAL TRANSZOIA COUNTY 026 KITALE MUSEUM UASIN GISHU 027 ELDORET POLYTECHNIC ELGEYO MARAKWET 028 IEBC CONSTITUENCY OFFICE - ITEN NANDI COUNTY 029 KAPSABET BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BARINGO COUNTY 030 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT, KABARNET LAIKIPIA COUNTY 031 NANYUKI HIGH SCHOOL NAKURU COUNTY 032 NAKURU HIGH SCHOOL NAROK COUNTY 033 MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY KAJIADO COUNTY 034 MASAI TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE KERICHO COUNTY 035 KERICHO TEA SEC. SCHOOL
    [Show full text]
  • Interruption of Electricity Supply
    NYANDARUA COUNTY Interruption of AREA: RUMURUTI, MARALAL DATE: Thursday 05.03.2020 TIME: 8.00 A.M. – 5.00 P.M. Electricity Supply Rumuruti Muthaiga, Kinamba Rumuruti, China International, Mugie Farm, Notice is hereby given under rule 27 of the Electric Power Rules Maundu Meri, Churo, Suguta Marmar, Tungamara, Poror, Kisima, Maralal & That the electricity supply will be interrupted as here under: adjacent customers. (It is necessary to interrupt supply periodically in order to facilitate maintenance and upgrade of power lines to the network; to connect new SAMBURU COUNTY customers or to replace power lines during road construction, etc.) AREA: WHOLE OF BARAGOI TOWN DATE: Tuesday 03.03.2020 TIME: 9.00 A.M. – 3.00 P.M. NAIROBI WEST REGION Whole of Baragoi, KDF Barracks, Baragoi Boys, Baragoi Hosp, Bendera Pri Sch & adjacent customers. NAIROBI COUNTY AREA: UPPERHILL NORTH RIFT REGION DATE: Saturday 29.02.2020 TIME: 9.00 A.M. - 5.00 P.M. British High Commission, Bibilia Husema Radio Stn, Part of Upperhill Rd & UASIN GISHU COUNTY adjacent customers. AREA: BARSOMBE, KOKWET DATE: Thursday 05.03.2020 TIME: 9.00 A.M. – 5.00 P.M. AREA: PART OF UPPERHILL Barsombe, Kokwet, Kapsigilai, Kiborom, Kaptiony, Chepterit, Lamaon, Lower DATE: Sunday 01.03.2020 TIME: 9.00 A.M. - 5.00 P.M. Moiben, Cheukta, Chebororwa, Koitugum, Ngeny & adjacent customers. Ragati Rd, Ragati Lane, DPP’s Office, Re Towers, Rahimtulla Building, Mwalimu Towers, Japanese Embassy, Mara Rd, Coca Cola, Kilimanjaro Rd, AREA: MAILI NNE, HURUMA TSC, Longonot Rd, Victoria Tower, Crowne Plaza, Part of Elgon Rd, Geo DATE: Thursday 05.03.2020 TIME: 9.00 A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • INSULT to INJURY the 2014 Lamu and Tana River Attacks and Kenya’S Abusive Response
    INSULT TO INJURY The 2014 Lamu and Tana River Attacks and Kenya’s Abusive Response HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH hrw.org www.khrc.or.ke Insult to Injury The 2014 Lamu and Tana River Attacks and Kenya’s Abusive Response Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-32446 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JUNE 2015 978-1-6231-32446 Insult to Injury The 2014 Lamu and Tana River Attacks and Kenya’s Abusive Response Map of Kenya and Coast Region ........................................................................................ i Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Country Policy and Information Note Kenya: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)
    Country Policy and Information Note Kenya: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) Version 1.0 June 2021 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules x The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Kwale County Gang Presence I N D I a N O C E
    d oa R di lin a M d ld a o O R i d n li a JOMVU T udor K ISAUN I M C reek Bamburi A109 Mombasa Road Kwa Jomvu PROFILE 4 Frere Town Kisauni Moi M 9 R 1 ag efi o ne ng ry o R oad Airport Ro oa Nyali R ad d Kisauni C HANG AMWE N Y A LI Makupa ad Ro A109 Ro d ort Causeway ad a Airp Ro d d Chaani a B s a o k a i R e n y l i Tudor a o Makupa ya L R o 10 N c t z b h ei rt R M K R Po o o L i a 12 . n Nyali i T a n d g k e Bridge s s ngo as Shimanzi R R Do Ku yp o o n B a a d S u d N h d i 8 m ad Mombasa Port a o n s R z MVITA nk i i d L a A R Ro o r a Jomvu e D d n oy 6 Buxton/ M E Old Town 2 Majengo H. Selas C sie Rd 11 7 Mo i Avenue d d O a a o o R R a e n r a e Kizingo g r n e a y T N 4 N Mbaraki r D N a A 5 in g 0 2 km Mama N I Likoni Ferry D d N a o LIKONI R a I d n Training grounds u k 3 U i- n County line o ik L A14 KILIFI COUNTY KENYA KWALE MOMBASA COUNTY COUNTY KWALE COUNTY GANG PRESENCE 1 Geta, Wakali Wao 5 Wakali Kwanza Wakali Kwanza Congo 6 64 Gang (burglaries, street robberies and muggings) by Force (burglaries, street robberies and muggings), Bad Squad (burglaries, street robberies and muggings), 7 Waiyo (street violence Bundesliga Bafana Bafana muggings and robberies), Bad Squad Funga File (targets and kills suspected thugs) 8 Wakali Kwanza 2 Wakali Kwanza ngs), Wakali Wao, 9 Spanish Sparter (burglaries, robberies and muggings), 64 Gang burglaries, street robberies and muggings), Vietnam (burglaries, 3 Gaza nd robberies), Wajukuu wa Bibi (street robberies and muggings) Buffalo robberies), Young Thugs, Akili za Usiku 10 Wakali Kwanza burglary), Kapenguria Six 11 Young Turks (burglaries, street r obberies and muggings), Temeke, Gater Family Born to Kill Crazy Boys, Home Boys (burglaries, street robberies and muggings), Chafu za Down (muggings, Young Mula (burglaries, street robberies and muggings) street violence), Vijiweni Boys, Watalia, Piyo Piyo (sale of illegal drugs, muggings, robberies) , Wakali Wao 12 Wakali Kwanza robberies and muggings), Wakali Kwanza robberies and muggings) 4 Wakali Kwanza (street muggings and burglary, robberies).
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report the Right to Information for Internally Displaced Persons in Kenya
    Baseline Report The right to information for internally displaced persons in Kenya Table of Contents ACRONYMS 5 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 6 ABSTRACT 7 ABOUT ARTICLE 19 EASTERN AFRICA 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 1. INTRODUCTION 14 1.1. Background on Internal Displacement in Kenya 15 1.2. Politically and ethnically instigated violence and displacement 16 1.2.1. Political and Ethnic violence – 1992-2002 16 1.2.2. Political and Ethnic violence post 2002 elections 16 1.3. Government interventions 17 1.4. Success, failures and challenges of these initiatives 18 2. LEGAL AND POLICY ENVIRONMENT FOR IDPS 21 2.1. Legal and Policy Framework on the Right to Information in Kenya 22 2.2. International and Regional mechanisms for IDPs 23 2.3. Towards a National Policy OF IDPs in Kenya 25 3. METHODOLOGY OF STUDY 26 3.1. Sampled regions 29 3.1.1. Western Region 30 3.1.2. Coast Region 30 3.1.3. Nyanza Region 30 3.1.4. Rift Valley Region 31 3.2. Techniques of Data Analysis 31 3.3. Limitations of Study 31 4.0. FINDINGS 33 4.1. General findings 34 Article 19: Right to information for IDPs in Kenya 3 4.1.1. Household Profiles 34 4.1.2. Causes of displacement 34 4.1.3. Access to information: overview 36 4.1.4. Loss of document and access to information 37 4.1.5. IDP Registration and profiling 38 4.1.6. Information on Government return, resettlement and reintegration programmes 39 4.1.7. Involvement of IDPs on policy making/ return and resettlement 41 4.1.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Dengue Fever Outbreak
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Kenya: Dengue Fever Outbreak DREF Operation MDRKE048 Glide n°: EP-2021-000047-KEN For DREF; Date of issue: 17 May 2021 Expected timeframe: 3 months Expected end date: 31 August 2021 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 370,666 Total number of people likely Approximately Number of people to be 250,000 people to be affected: 1,352,253 people assisted: Provinces expected to be 2 counties – Provinces/Regions 2 counties – Mombasa affected: Mombasa and Lamu targeted: and Lamu and possibly extending to adjacent counties Host National Society(ies) presence: Two Kenya Red Cross branches, 300 volunteers, 10 staff in Mombasa and Lamu Counties Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: IFRC regional officer in Nairobi Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: The Ministry of Health and County Health departments from the two counties of Lamu and Mombasa. Other partners are KEMRI-Welcome Trust. A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster According to the county department of health in Mombasa, the first Dengue cases were reported in early March 2021 with 24 cases testing positive out of 47 (51% positivity rate). In April, another 305 cases tested positive out of 315 (97% positivity rate). The adjacent Lamu county, has also reported a total of 224 positive cases from different health facilities where 59 are children under 5 years old. Cumulatively, 553 cases have been reported within the past 4 months of January, February, March and April, with a peak of cases being reported in April.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-County Zone Schools LDD TDD PROJECTOR KWALE TSIMBATIWI ZONE Chitsanzepri 19 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE St
    SUMMARY OF INSTALLATION OF DEVICES IN PUBLIC PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN KWALE COUNTY Sub-County Zone Schools LDD TDD PROJECTOR KWALE TSIMBATIWI ZONE ChitsanzePri 19 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE St. Josephs 87 2 1 MSAMBWENI MSAMBWENI ZONE Jomo Kenyatta 111 2 1 KINANGO GANDINI ZONE BOFU 100 2 1 KINANGO GANDINI ZONE GANDINI CENTRAL 70 2 1 KINANGO GANDINI ZONE LUTSANGANI 99 2 1 KINANGO GANDINI ZONE YAPHA 63 2 1 KINANGO GANDINI ZONE GONA 62 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE MBULUNI 103 2 1 KINANGO MAZERAS ZONE GWASHENI 143 2 1 KINANGO MAZERAS ZONE MIGUNENI 95 2 1 KINANGO MAZERAS ZONE MAZERAS 98 2 1 KINANGO MAZERAS ZONE MWABILA 72 2 1 KINANGO MAZERAS ZONE MWACHE 76 2 1 KINANGO MAZERAS ZONE MAWEU 74 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE KASAGENI 75 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE KINANGO 68 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE NG'ONZINI 66 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE MAZOLA 90 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE BANG'A 57 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE AMANI 68 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE BISHOP KALU 68 2 1 KINANGO KINANGO ZONE MALUNGONI 42 2 1 KINANGO MAZERAS MAVIRIVIRINI 53 2 1 KINANGO NDAVAYA MWACHANDA 118 2 1 KINANGO NDAVAYA MWALUKOMBE 130 2 1 KINANGO NDAVAYA GULANZE 90 2 1 KINANGO NDAVAYA NDAVAYA 80 2 1 KINANGO NDAVAYA VYOGATO 45 2 1 KINANGO NDAVAYA MBITA 62 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU TARU 119 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU KWAKADOGO 114 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU MWANGEA 128 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU EGU 67 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU MAJI YA CHUMVI 58 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU VINYUNDUNI 74 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU SILALONI 68 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU CHENGONI 128 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU MULUNGUNI 95 2 1 KINANGO SAMBURU JAFFREY 51 2 1 KINANGO MKONGANI MKOMBA 79 2 1 KINANGO MKONGANI MAPONDA 95 2 1 KINANGO MKONGANI NZORA 78 2 1 KINANGO MKONGANI SIMANYA 50 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI MWANGUDA 136 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI GUGU 79 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI VWIVWINI 125 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI MSHIU 75 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI SHIMONI 80 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI KIKONENI 80 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI MABAFWENI 51 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI MARENJE 53 2 1 MSAMBWENI KIKONENI MKWIRO 44 2 1 MSAMBWENI LUNGA LUNGA KIWEGU 110 2 1 MSAMBWENI LUNGA LUNGA JEGO 109 2 1 MSAMBWENI LUNGA LUNGA KIDOMAYA 87 2 1 MSAMBWENI LUNGA LUNGA ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Led Security Approaches to Violent Extremism
    INUKA!: COMMUNITY-LED SECURITY APPROACHES TO VIOLENT EXTREMISM Conflict Scan to inform Inuka! programming by Search for Common Ground Kenya, in partnership with Kenya Muslim Youth Alliance (KMYA), Muslims for Human rights (MUHURI), and Kiunga Youth Bunge Initiative CONTACT: JUDY KIMAMO DECEMBER 2017 Director Search for Common Ground [email protected] 1. Executive Summary Context and Methodology Since Kenyan forces intervened militarily in Somalia in October 2011, a toxic combination of push and pull factors has led to the emergence of a home-grown, Kenyan Al-Shabaab insurgency that is feeding on historical religious and regional divides in the country. Violent attacks have occurred across Kenya, but with greater frequency in the primarily-Muslim coastal region, a part of Kenya that has experienced long-standing political exclusion and economic marginalization as well as active separatist movements. These attacks have devastated the local economy by causing the collapse of the tourism industry in the coastal counties, leaving a large population of idle and unemployed youth with little hope for a positive future. Recent research and learning by the peace and development field in Kenya1 has established that heavy- handed security responses involving human rights abuses and the “guilty-by-association” criminalization of the entire Muslim community have led to a lack of trust, communication, and coordination amongst key community, government, and security stakeholders around preventing and countering Violent Extremism (VE). This approach has further exacerbated tensions between communities and security actors, leaving vulnerable populations more susceptible to the influence of radicalization2. Entry points to influence the context have been difficult to exploit.
    [Show full text]