DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation Findings on the Brown Hill Keswick Creek Stormwater Project: Part B Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consultation Findings on the Brown Hill Keswick Creek Stormwater Project: Part B Report Consultation findings on the Brown Hill Keswick Creek Stormwater Project: Part B Report Prepared for the Brown Hill Keswick Creek Stormwater Project by: Natalie Fuller and Associates Pty Ltd in partnership with URPS AUGUST 2015 Contents Contents List of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................2 Distribution of information materials and feedback forms ........................................................................ 2 Conduct of open days ................................................................................................................................. 3 Summary of Consultation Activities ........................................................................................................... 4 Additional efforts to maximise response rate ............................................................................................ 5 Responses received .................................................................................................................................... 5 Summary of feedback received .................................................................................................................. 5 Part One: Consultation Process .......................................................................................................... 13 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 The Part B Report ......................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Previous community engagement ............................................................................................... 15 1.2.1 In preparing the Part B Report ........................................................................................................ 15 1.2.2 On release of the Part B Report ....................................................................................................... 15 1.2.3 Prior to commencement of formal consultation on the Part B Report ........................................... 16 1.3 Purpose of the consultation on the Part B Report ....................................................................... 17 2.0 Community Consultation Activities ......................................................................................... 19 2.1 Written materials ......................................................................................................................... 19 2.2 Liaison with community and special interest groups ................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Community groups .......................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.2 Government ..................................................................................................................................... 21 2.3 Direct mail outs to creek property owners and occupiers ........................................................... 21 2.4 Promotion of the consultation process to wider community ...................................................... 23 2.4.1 Advertisements and articles ............................................................................................................ 23 2.4.2 Project and council websites ........................................................................................................... 24 2.4.3 Signs on public parks ....................................................................................................................... 24 2.5 Open Days .................................................................................................................................... 24 Part Two: Consultation Findings ......................................................................................................... 26 3.0 Feedback Forms ..................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 27 3.1.1 Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2 Design and distribution of feedback forms ..................................................................................... 27 3.1.3 Analysis of feedback forms .............................................................................................................. 28 3.2 Response rate ............................................................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Response rate from creek property owners .................................................................................... 30 i Document Issued: 12 August 2015 Contents 3.2.2 Response rate from creek property non-owner occupiers ............................................................. 31 3.2.3 Response rate from interested members of the public .................................................................. 31 3.3 Profile of respondents .................................................................................................................. 32 3.3.1 Property ownership ......................................................................................................................... 32 3.3.2 Risk of flooding ................................................................................................................................ 33 3.3.3 Usage of public parks ....................................................................................................................... 35 3.4 Importance of flood mitigation .................................................................................................... 36 3.5 Level of support for Option D....................................................................................................... 42 3.6 Level of support for other options ............................................................................................... 49 3.7 Impact of works on properties ..................................................................................................... 54 3.7.1 Creek capacity upgrade works ......................................................................................................... 54 3.7.2 Creek rehabilitation works .............................................................................................................. 56 3.8 Legal arrangements ...................................................................................................................... 57 3.9 Other comments .......................................................................................................................... 60 4.0 Written Submissions .............................................................................................................. 64 4.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 64 4.1.1 Brown Hill Save Our Creeks Environs Trees ..................................................................................... 65 4.1.2 Brownhill Creek Association Incorporated ...................................................................................... 65 4.1.3 Creek Class Action Advocacy ........................................................................................................... 67 4.1.4 Friends of the City of Unley Society ................................................................................................. 67 4.1.5 ForTrees ........................................................................................................................................... 68 4.1.6 Friends of Brownhill Creek............................................................................................................... 69 4.1.7 Goodwood Residents Action Group ................................................................................................ 70 4.1.8 Kaurna Nation Cultural Heritage Association .................................................................................. 70 4.1.9 Mitcham Creek Preservation ........................................................................................................... 71 4.1.10 Mitcham Historical Society .............................................................................................................. 71 4.1.11 No Dam in Brownhill Creek Community Action Group .................................................................... 72 4.1.12 Residents for Effective Stormwater Solutions Incorporated ........................................................... 72 4.1.13 West Unley Protection of Trees ....................................................................................................... 73 4.2 Businesses .................................................................................................................................... 74 4.2.1 Brown Hill Creek Tourist Park .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Patawalonga Catchment and the Impact of Farm Dam Development
    DWLBC REPORT Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Patawalonga Catchment and the Impact of Farm Dam Development 2007/09 Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Patawalonga Catchment and the Impact of Farm Dam Development Kim Teoh Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation January 2006 Report DWLBC 2007/09 Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone National (08) 8463 6946 International +61 8 8463 6946 Fax National (08) 8463 6999 International +61 8 8463 6999 Website www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au Disclaimer Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. © Government of South Australia, through the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2007 This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission obtained from the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Chief Executive, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001. ISBN-13 978-1-921218-45-3 Preferred way to cite this publication Teoh, K 2006, Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Patawalonga Catchment and the Impact of Farm Dam Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Hill Keswick Creek Catchment Stormwater Management Plan 2016
    BROWN HILL KESWICK CREEK CATCHMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 MARCH 2016 THE CITIES OF ADELAIDE, BURNSIDE, MITCHAM, UNLEY AND WEST TORRENS Electronic files in PDF format: Main document (including figures): file name bhkc20160311d – smp+figures Appendices: file name bhkc20160311d – appendices Main document (including figures) with appendices: file name bhkc20160311d www.bhkcstormwater.com.au Endorsed: BHKC project Steering Group 11 March 2016 File: bhkc20160311d – smp+figures Cover Photo: Ridge Park flood control dam – biofiltration basin and water injection and extraction bore housing for the managed aquifer recharge facility CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... IX LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... X ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... XIV REFERENCE TO STREETS AND ROADS ............................................................................................ XVI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................................... XVII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Chapter 11
    11 Services Infrastructure ADELAIDE AIRPORT / MASTER PLAN 2019 189 11.1. Introduction 11.2. Overview Services infrastructure is a key component of Adelaide Airport’s operations both now and into • Services infrastructure at Adelaide the future. It comprises the power, water, sewer, Airport will continue to expand to telecommunications and stormwater networks that service aviation and non-aviation related meet increases in demand across developments across the Airport Business District. the airport, arising from increased The reliability, efficiency and sustainability of these passenger movements and new networks and supply arrangements are the key developments. objectives for Adelaide Airport when planning for services infrastructure. AAL works closely with • Augmentation of the existing utility external utilities providers to ensure these essential networks will likely include: services are available to support the operation and – growth of the airport. Potential relocation of the 750 millimetre water main which transects the airport site – Expansion of networks to supply new areas of development – New services infrastructure to the Airport East Precinct Figure 11-1: Installed Solar Photovoltaics on Multi-Storey Car Park Roof 190 ADELAIDE AIRPORT / MASTER PLAN 2019 11.3. Recent Developments Improvements to the services infrastructure that have • Connection to the underground aquifers located been implemented since Master Plan 2014 include: along the southern boundary of the airport for use by the Terminal 1 cooling towers • Installation
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Will Discuss the Primary Issues Relating to the Introduction of the Concept of Smps
    STORMWATER 2010 National Conference of the Stormwater Industry Association Conference Proceedings STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA THEIR EVOLUTION AND THEIR FUNCTION Author/s: Mr Christopher Wright, Water Projects Officer, Water Management Services, Adelaide & Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board Bill Lipp, Principal Stormwater Engineer, SA Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure Abstract Stormwater Management Plans (SMP) are intended to become the major tool in determining the planning and investment strategies for all things related to urban stormwater in SA. Ultimately it is intended that all applications for funding from the Stormwater Management Authority must be supported by a SMP that has been formally endorsed by the relevant Natural Resources Management Board. This is intended to ensure that planning for stormwater infrastructure is done on a catchment or whole of town basis and that there is degree of uniformity in the plans produced. The SMP has to set objectives for stormwater management and to focus on flood risk, water quality and reuse. It also has to allow for the way in which urban land use will affect stormwater in future years. This paper will discuss the primary issues relating to the introduction of the concept of SMPs. It will highlight the problem areas experienced in preparing these plans and how they were overcome. The paper will conclude with some proposals to provide better guidance in the development of future SMPs 1. Introduction Stormwater Management Plans (SMPs) in South Australia are intended to become the major tool in determining the planning and investment strategies for all urban stormwater actions and measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Level Specification for Flood Forecasting and Warning Services for South Australia – Version 3.3
    Service Level Specification for Flood Forecasting and Warning Services for South Australia – Version 3.3 Service Level Specification for Flood Forecasting and Warning Services for South Australia This document outlines the Service Level Specification for Flood Forecasting and Warning Services provided by the Commonwealth of Australia through the Bureau of Meteorology for the State of South Australia in consultation with the South Australian Flood Warning Consultative Committee. Service Level Specification for Flood Forecasting and Warning Services for South Australia Published by the Bureau of Meteorology GPO Box 1289 Melbourne VIC 3001 (03) 9669 4000 www.bom.gov.au With the exception of logos, this guide is licensed under a Creative Commons Australia Attribution Licence. The terms and conditions of the licence are at www.creativecommons.org.au © Commonwealth of Australia (Bureau of Meteorology) 2020. Cover image: Flood waters crossing the ford, Onkaparinga River at Oakbank, July 2010. Photo taken by the Bureau of Meteorology. i Service Level Specification for Flood Forecasting and Warning Services for South Australia Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Flood Warning Consultative Committee .......................................................................... 5 3 Bureau flood forecasting and warning services ............................................................... 6 4 Level of service and performance reporting
    [Show full text]
  • ACWS Technical Report No.3 Prepared for the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study Steering Committee, July 2005
    Stage 2 Research Program 2003 - 2005 Technical Report No. 3 July 2005 Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme Authors Jeremy Wilkinson, John Hutson, Erick Bestland and Howard Fallowfield Flinders University of South Australia GPO Box 2100, Adelaide SA 5001 Copyright © 2005 South Australian Environment Protection Authority This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for the purpose of study or training, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source and to its not being used for commercial purposes or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires the prior written permission of the Environment Protection Authority. Disclaimer This report has been prepared by consultants for the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) and the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the EPA. The EPA cannot guarantee the accuracy of the report, and does not accept liability for any loss or damage incurred as a result of relying on its accuracy. ISBN 1 876562 86 2 July 2005 Reference This report can be cited as: Wilkinson, J., Hutson, J., Bestland, E. and H. Fallowfield. (2005). “Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme”. ACWS Technical Report No.3 prepared for the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study Steering Committee, July 2005. Department of Environmental Health, Flinders University of South Australia. Acknowledgement This report is a product of the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Will Thank You for Your Timely Article on the Absurdity of So Many of the Names with Which Our Localities in South Australia Are Humiliated
    B The public will thank you for your timely article on the absurdity of so many of the names with which our localities in South Australia are humiliated. The places so handicapped are, like the unfortunate infants christened after certain celebrities, voiceless in the matter… (Register, 25 July 1900, page 7d) Baan Hill - On section 50, Hundred of Allenby; an adjacent spring gives a good supply of water all year round; derived from the Aboriginal panau - ‘ochre’. The name was given to a pastoral run by H.S. Williams and J.T. Bagot and, on 24 June 1976, proclaimed as a recreation reserve. Babbage, Mount - B.H. Babbage discovered the mountain in 1856 and named it ‘Mount Hopeful’; in the following year it was renamed by G.W. Goyder. Babbage Peninsula, situated on Lake Eyre North was, virtually, discovered by Babbage, as opposed to Lake Eyre South which was discovered by E.J. Eyre and not named until 1963. Born in London, circa 1814, he came to South Australia in the Hydaspes in 1851. A qualified engineer he was involved in the construction of the Port Adelaide railway, entered Parliament in 1857 and resigned nine months later to command a northern exploration party. By the end of six months his explorations had scarcely penetrated beyond the limits of pastoral settlement and, consequently, both the public and the government, increasingly, became impatient at his slow rate of progress. Eventually, Major P. E. Warburton was dispatched to take over the leadership and, later, it was said that, ‘Babbage’s expedition of 1858-59 was one of the most fruitful in its detailed collection of geographical information and the minuteness of its survey work.’ The Advertiser of 24 December 1858 has a satirical poem - one verse reads: Each caviller at Babbage then A fairy land, no doubt, he’d see, We’d northward send exploring Where others saw but gravel, To find new land, or water when And geographic problems he He chose artesian boring! Most surely would unravel.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Non-Market Values in Economic Analyses of Flood Mitigation: a Case Study of the Brown Hill and Keswick Creeks Catchment in Adelaide
    Integrating non-market values in economic analyses of flood mitigation: a case study of the Brown Hill and Keswick creeks catchment in Adelaide Morteza Chalaka, Veronique Florecb*, Atakelty Hailub, Fiona Gibsonb and David Pannellb aDepartment of Treasury and Finance, Victoria, Australia bCentre for Environmental Economics and Policy, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia *E-mail address: [email protected] 26 April 2017 Working Paper 1702 UWA Agricultural and Resource Economics http://www.are.uwa.edu.au Citation: Chalak, M., Florec, V., Hailu, A., Gibson, F. and Pannell, D.J (2017) Economic analysis of flood mitigation options for the Brown Hill and Keswick creeks catchment in Adelaide: integrating non-market values, Working Paper 1702, Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia. © Copyright remains with the authors of this document. Integrating non-market values in economic analysis of flood mitigation options: a case study of the Brown Hill and Keswick creeks catchment in Adelaide Morteza Chalak, Veronique Florec, Atakelty Hailu, Fiona Gibson and David Pannell Abstract: This study undertakes an economic analysis of flood mitigation options for a high flood risk catchment in Adelaide, South Australia: the Brown Hill and Keswick creeks catchment. Several proposals for flood mitigation investments have been presented, including creek capacity upgrades, high flow bypass culverts and detention dams. For flood managers to know which option or options provide the best value for money, it is necessary to compare the costs and the benefits of all available options. To date, economic analyses have focused primarily on estimating the tangible (market) costs and benefits of mitigation strategies, but have largely ignored the intangible (non-market) costs and benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2003DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT– AND 0URBAN PLANNING4 Level 12 Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace ADELAIDE SA 5000 DX407 PO Box 8197, Station Arcade ADELAIDE SA 5000 Telephone (08) 8204 8200 Facsimile (08) 8204 8216 www.dtup.sa.gov.au Department of Transport & Urban Planning Annual Report - DTUP (Print) ISSN 1448-7357 Annual Report - DTUP (Online) ISSN 1448-742X Annual Report - DTUP (CD-ROM) ISSN 1448-7365 Front Cover Dynamic photograph of traffic entering the Heysen Tunnels DTUP 2003-2004 Annual Report The Honourable Trish White MP The Honourable John Hill MP Minister for Transport Minister for the Southern Suburbs Minister for Urban Development and Planning Level 9 Level 12 Chesser House Roma Mitchell House 91-97 Grenfell Street 136 North Terrace ADELAIDE SA 5000 ADELAIDE SA 5000 The Honourable Rory McEwen MP Minister for State/Local Government Relations Level 9 Terrace Towers 178 North Terrace ADELAIDE SA 5000 Dear Ministers, I have pleasure in presenting the annual report of the Department of Transport and Urban Planning for the year ended 30 June 2004. The Department continues to change to meet the diverse needs of the Ministerial portfolios and the Government’s strategic directions. The report details the work, achievements and relevant statutory and financial information of the Department and provides an insight into the priorities for 2004-05. The Department looks forward to a challenging and exciting year in which it will continue to contribute to the growth and prosperity of South Australia. This report is for submission to Parliament and complies with the requirements of the Public Sector Management Act 1995 and the Public Finance and Audit Act 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • ACWS Water Data Audit Report, 2015
    .. .. .... ~;~ter data services Report Prepared for: South Australia Envii ronment Protection Authority South Australia Adelaide Coastal Water Study : S1t ormwater Data Audit Report 2015 Water Data Services Pt¥ Ltd www .waterdata.com.au. 1 Erudf11a Ave Edwa rdstown SA 5039 P 08 837'4 3522 F OS- 8374 3566 Date: Tuesday 20th June 2017 Delivery: Electronic Copy (via email) Principal Environment Protection Officer (Water Quality) Environment Protection Authority SA Level 9, 250 Victoria Square, ADELAIDE, 5000 Via email: Report: Adelaide Coastal Waters Study : Stormwater Data Audit Report 2015 Client Contact: Principal Environment Protection Officer (Water Quality) Environment Protection Authority SA Level 9, 250 Victoria Square, ADELAIDE, SA, 5000 Via email: Contractor: Prepared and submitted by: Operations Manager Water Data Services Pty Ltd 1 Erudina Ave Edwardstown SA 5039 Telephone 08 8374 3522 Facsimile 08 8374 3566 E-mail ~~ter data services Environment Protection Authority SA Executive Summary In 2005 a data audit was undertaken to investigate data availability for current and historical monitoring programs in the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study (ACWS) area. The audit was focussed on stormwater quality and quantity and identified data gaps in the monitoring programs. This report in 2015 is an audit of the data collected in the period 2005 to 2014 to determine if previous monitoring gaps have been filled and identify current and future gaps in the monitoring programs. The report also summarises changes and improvements to data sets report in the 2005 audit. Flows observed during this period were influenced by drought conditions. The several years of below average rainfall resulted in prolonged periods of below average flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods in South Australia.Pdf
    Floods in South Australia 1836–2005 David McCarthy Tony Rogers Keith Casperson Project Manager: David McCarthy Book Editor: Tony Rogers DVD Editor: Keith Casperson © Commonwealth of Australia 2006 This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above, requires the prior written permission of the Commonwealth available through the Commonwealth Copyright Administration or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca Commonwealth Copyright Administration. Attorney-General’s Department Robert Garran Offices National Circuit Barton ACT 2600 Australia Telephone: +61 2 6250 6200 Facsimile: +61 2 6250 5989 Please note that this permission does not apply to any photograph, illustration, diagram or text over which the Commonwealth of Australia does not hold copyright, but which may be part of or contained within the material specified above. Please examine the material carefully for evidence of other copyright holders. Where a copyright holder, other than the Commonwealth of Australia, is identified with respect to a specific item in the material that you wish to reproduce, please contact that copyright holder directly. Project under the direction of Chris Wright, South Australian Regional Hydrologist, Bureau of Meteorology The Bureau of Meteorology ISBN 0-642-70699-9 (from 1 January 2007 ISBN 978-0-642-70699-7) Presentation copy (hard cover) ISBN 0-642-70678-6 (from 1 January 2007 ISBN 978-0-642-70678-2) Printed in Australia by Hyde Park Press, Richmond, South Australia The following images are courtesy of the State Library of South Australia: title page, B20266; flood commentaries sub-title, B15780; chronology sub-title, B29245; appendixes sub-title, B5995; indexes sub-title, B5995.
    [Show full text]
  • STORMWATER STRATEGY the FUTURE of STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT for WATER the Document Is Managed by the Policy and Urban Water Division
    STORMWATER STRATEGY THE FUTURE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FOR WATER The document is managed by the Policy and Urban Water Division. For more information: telephone (08) 8463 6920 www.waterforgood.sa.gov.au www.sa.gov.au STORMWATER STRATEGY – THE FUTURE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTENTS FOREWORD 5 BACKGROUND 6 THE FUTURE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 8 STORMWATER IN A WATER SENSITIVE CITY 13 URBAN RUN-OFF IN THE ENVIRONMENT 15 STORMWATER USE 16 REDUCING FLOOD RISK 19 RESEARCH 21 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 23 THE NEXT STEPS 25 APPENDIX 1 – OTHER POLICIES AND PLANS 27 APPENDIX 2 – WATER FOR GOOD ACTIONS 28 APPENDIX 3 – EXISTING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 30 WaterStormwater News Strategy | 3 | 3 | DEPARTMENT FOR WATER STORMWATER STRATEGY – THE FUTURE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WaterStormwater News Strategy | 3 | 4 | DEPARTMENT FOR WATER STORMWATER STRATEGY – THE FUTURE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOREWORD South Australians understand the value of water and have become great innovators, working to maximise the water resources available to them. As a result, our State is an acknowledged leader in recycling treated wastewater and stormwater capture and reuse and we have the highest per capita rainwater tank ownership in Australia. Yet we must do more if we are to achieve our goal of becoming a truly ‘water sensitive state’. Around the country we have witnessed the severe impacts of extreme weather events which are likely to occur more frequently under anticipated climate change scenarios. We need to be able to adapt to the extremes of Australia’s climate by managing drought and flood to minimise the effects on our communities whilst ensuring that natural systems receive the range of flows they require to remain healthy.
    [Show full text]