DOCSLIB.ORG

Canberra Law Review (2016) 14(1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canberra Law Review (2016) 14(1) Volume 14(1) – 2016 Editor: Robert MacLean Student Editors: Ben Vader Duff Isabella Heilikmann Liv Hume Erina Fletcher FOREWORD Isabella Heilikmann ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE TIMELINE WILL THE REAL ZOMBIE TAX PLEASE STAND UP! Editors Olivia Hume PROPOSED ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE LAW REFORMS TO WHAT EXTENT SHOULD WE EXTEND HUMAN RIGHTS TO ZOMBIES? Contributors Erina Fletcher PART I: REFEREED ARTICLES PROTECTING THE INFECTED. GOVERNMENT ACQUISITION OF CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF A PATENTS DURING THE ZOMBIE ZOMBIE OUTBREAK APOCALYPSE Dr Bede Harris Benjamin Duff IS THE ZOMBIE MY NEIGHBOUR? THE ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE AS A LENS FOR PART III: SUPPLEMENTAL ZOMBIE UNDERSTANDING LEGAL PERSONHOOD MATERIALS Bruce Baer Arnold UNATURAL DISASTERS: EMERGENCY Zombie Isaacs designed by Joe Mikus MANAGEMENT IN A TIME OF ZOMBIES Robert MacLean PART II: REFEREED STUDENT ARTICLES ESCAPING THE SEA OF ZOMBIES: LESSONS LEARNED FROM CLIMATE CHANGE REFUGEES 1 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Copyright © University of Canberra and individual authors 2017 This journal issue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/> 2 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Canberra Law Review (2016) 14(1) Canberra Law Review Welcome to the 2016 edition of the Canberra Law Review. No apology is needed if you skipped the foreword and went straight to the articles, it is after all the human thing to do (though it may be an incorrect assumption that all our readers are human). The 2016 Canberra Law Review was an opportunity to experiment with the teaching of law. On one level, it was an opportunity to conduct a Gedankenexperiment, encouraging students and colleagues to consider how a global zombie apocalypse would impact Australian law. On a second level, it allowed University of Canberra staff to experiment with teaching law through the usage of social media and with continued reference to and incorporation of popular media. Over an initial four-week period during Winter Semester 2016, the students met with the unit convenor to rough out their expectations for the unit. In consultation with other UC staff, the unit convenor developed a ‘Zombie Apocalypse Timeline’ and a series of assumptions about the nature of the zombie apocalypse, that enabled a series of ‘flashpoints’ to be created. Each of these flashpoints then served as triggers for looking at contemporary Australian legal issues through the somewhat distorted lens of the zombie apocalypse. For the first six weeks of Semester 2, students were encouraged to apply existing legal precedent and procedure to the novel situation, first by focusing on the principles that underlay contemporary law and legal institutions and then seeing how much of that law was applicable to the world of the ‘Walking Dead’, the regency romance of ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ and finally that of the Zombie Apocalypse Timeline. For the last six weeks of the semester, students prepared a research paper on a topic that had had engaged them in the earlier discussions. Each week students brought their progressively improving draft research papers to the class forums and the group collectively analysed the issues raised and suggested ways that the paper could be improved. As external comments and papers were received, the students began to expand their editing and citation skills, all the while seeing glimpsing alternate legal philosophies in the dark mirror that is the zombie apocalypse. Did it work as a means of teaching law? These papers are one way of answering that question. I could also cite the high student engagement levels and the subsequent positive feedback the unit received. Perhaps the best answer lies in the number of students who have subsequent gone on to honours dissertations and post graduate study, though sadly none in the burgeoning field of ‘zombie law’ I would like to thank the University of Canberra Law School for this opportunity to explore the extremities of law and society and hope that other academics find similar opportunities in future. The underlying legal issues associated with ‘the rise of the machines’ and the associated ‘robo-apocalypse’ are still out there! Rob MacLean Unit Convenor and Staff Editor 3 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Canberra Law Review (2016) 14(1) ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE TIMELINE First Movement – Tardo* ñ Isolated zombie outbreaks outside of Australia. ñ No issues with the supply of water, electricity, food or information. ñ International travel is severely restricted by Governments ñ Strong Federal and State governments. ñ Solid and consistent rule of law. ñ Economy is based on electronic funds. First Movement – Flashpoint – ‘Ashes to Ashes’. The Australian men’s cricket team tour of England is abandoned due to a zombie pitch invasion at Lords. The Australian Cricket Board plans to fly the team back to Australia, however the Minister for Health imposes a 24 day quarantine period on Manus Island, before the team can re-enter Australia. The Australian Cricket Board launches immediate legal action to overturn the administrative decision. Second Movement – Affrettando† ñ Cities outside of Australia are overrun by Zombies. ñ Refugees from the Zombie Apocalypse seek entry to Australia. ñ Isolated instances of Zombies in Australia, which are initially contained by police. ñ Minor issues with the supply of water, electricity, food and information. ñ Federal government grows in power – some civil liberties suspended, military units mobilised to secure key resources. ñ Intermittent and short duration instances of the breakdown of the rule of law (restored by Federal and State Government). ñ Economy moves from electronic funds transfer to cash. Second Movement Flashpoint – ‘Turn back the planes’. A QANTAS 747-400 en-route from Los Angeles to Sydney, is 90 minutes out from arriving in Sydney when the pilots radio that a passenger has transformed into a zombie and has attacked the other passengers. In the background of the transmission can be heard guttural moans and thumping sounds on the cockpit doors. The pilots subsequently radio that no one else was ‘infected’. A prominent Sydney shock jock becomes aware of the crisis and re-broadcasts the radio transmission. A social media storm flares, with calls for the Royal Australian Air Force to shoot down the plane over international waters. The plane has enough fuel to be diverted to Newcastle or Canberra, but local citizens break down fences and park their cars on the runways to prevent the plane landing. * A musical instruction meaning to play slowly. † A musical instruction meaning to hastily increase the tempo in an impatient manner. 4 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Canberra Law Review (2016) 14(1) Third Movement – Mosso‡ ñ Some countries outside of Australia are overrun by Zombies. ñ Efforts to aid or prevent further refugees are abandoned. ñ Zombies are now present on the streets of all Australian cities and major towns. ñ Federal Government fails, with State and Local Government actors becoming the primary agents for anti- zombie action. ñ Consistent electrical failure, internet and mobile phone networks fail, no food in supermarkets and minimal international news. ñ Breakdown of the rule of law in Australian cities and country regions (wide spread theft and looting). ñ Economy moves from cash to barter. Third Movement – Flashpoint – ‘Well may they say God save the Queen, because nothing will save the Governor General’. With the disappearance and presumed death of 32 members of the House of Representatives and 15 Senators, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition decide to form a government of National Unity. The new cabinet is sworn in at a ceremony at the Governor General’s residence in Yarralumla. However due to an unfortunate security lapse, during the post ceremony photograph the Governor General transforms into a zombie and kills the newly formed cabinet. Fourth Movement – Prestissimo§ ñ Australia cities and countryside overrun by Zombies. ñ Fortified community groups become the primary agents for anti-zombie action. ñ Isolated solar power, survivors scrounging for food, some community radio stations. ñ Local dictatorships and oligarchies assume legal power. ñ Economy is limited to barter. Fourth Movement – Flashpoint ‘Australia’s got talent’. Former music talent show winner Wolfgang Silverhair proclaims the nation of Bertoota in the Hunter Valley. President for Life Silverhair ‘nationalises’ the remaining food, military and medical resources and announces that any non Bertootians will be shot on sight. Road barriers are placed across the New England and Pacific Highways and the unanimated corpses of local citizens who opposed Bertootian rule are suspended from nooses at cross- roads. ‡ A musical instruction meaning with motion or animation. § A musical instruction meaning with as fast a tempo as possible. 5 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Canberra Law Review (2016) 14(1) Coda – Allargando** ñ Zombies threat is broken. ñ Consolidation of power from community / local government level to a mix of regional and state levels. ñ Discussion about whether to reform the Commonwealth of Australia, however various regions are lobbying for formal statehood and some regions are seeking independence or special indigenous status. ñ A suppressant is discovered by an Australian start up that prevents anyone infected from transforming in to a zombie. (The search for a permanent cure continues) ñ Restoration of electrical power, centralised food distribution, state and national television and radio. ñ Economy moves from barter to cash. ñ Rule
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE UNIVERSITY of WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW Volume 42(1) May 2017
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW Volume 42(1) May 2017 Articles Ministerial Advisers and the Australian Constitution Yee‐Fui Ng .............................................................................................................. 1 All-Embracing Approaches to Constitutional Interpretation & ‘Moderate Originalism’ Stephen Puttick ........................................................................................................ 30 A Proportionate Burden: Revisiting the Constitutionality of Optional Preferential Voting Eric Chan ................................................................................................................ 57 London & New Mashonaland Exploration Co Ltd v New Mashonaland Exploration Co Ltd: Is It Authority That Directors Can Compete with the Company? Dominique Le Miere ............................................................................................... 98 Claims Relating to Possession of a Ship: Wilmington Trust Company (Trustee) v The Ship “Houston” [2016] FCA 1349 Mohammud Jaamae Hafeez‐Baig and Jordan English ......................................... 128 Intimidation, Consent and the Role of Holistic Judgments in Australian Rape Law Jonathan Crowe and Lara Sveinsson..................................................................... 136 Young Offenders Act 1984 (WA), Section 126 Special Orders: Extra Punitive Sentencing Legislation for Juveniles’ Craig Astill and William Yoo .......................................................................... 155 From Down
    [Show full text]
  • Composition of Australian Parliaments by Party and Gender: a Quick Guide
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2016–17 16 MAY 2017 Composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender: a quick guide Anna Hough Politics and Public Administration This quick guide contains the most recent tables showing the composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender (see Table 1 and Table 2 below). It takes into account changes to the Commonwealth parliament and the parliaments of Western Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania since the last update was published on 20 February 2017. Commonwealth • In the Senate, Peter Georgiou (PHON, WA) replaces Rod Culleton (Ind., WA), whose election was declared void by the High Court sitting as the Court of Disputed returns. Senator Georgiou was sworn in on 27 March 2017. • Senator Lucy Gichuhi (Ind., SA) replaces Bob Day (Family First Party, SA) following Day’s resignation in November 2016. In late April 2017 the Family First Party merged with the Australian Conservatives (with the combined party to be called the Australian Conservatives). Senator Gichuhi, who was sworn in on 9 May 2017, has opted not to join the merged party. Western Australia • The figures for Western Australia reflect the results of the state general election held on 11 March 2017. New members of the Legislative Council elected on that date are included in the figures, and will take their seats on 22 May 2017. New South Wales • In New South Wales, following three by-elections on 8 April 2017: – Liesl Tesch (ALP) became the Member for Gosford, replacing Kathy Smith (ALP) – James Griffin (LP) became the Member for Manly, replacing Mike Baird (LP) and – Felicity Wilson (LP) became the Member for North Shore, replacing Jillian Skinner (LP).
    [Show full text]
  • Apo-Nid133326.Pdf
    Economic and political overview 2018 About this publication Economic and Political Overview 2018 © CEDA 2018 ISSN: 0813-121X The views expressed in this document are those of the authors, and should not be attributed to CEDA. CEDA’s objective in publishing this collection is to encourage constructive debate and discussion on matters of national economic importance. Persons who rely upon the material published do so at their own risk. Design Robyn Zwar Design Xenophon, CEDA State of the Nation, 2017: CEDA collection. (Bottom right) Photography Nationals Deputy Leader Senator Fiona Nash, CEDA State of the Nation 2017: Cover images: (Top left) Prime Minister the Hon. Malcolm Turnbull and Federal CEDA collection. Leader of the Opposition, the Hon. Bill Shorten, Question Time, 8 February Page 32: (Left) Federal Leader of the Opposition The Hon. Bill Shorten MP, CEDA 2017, AAP Image/Mick Tsikas. (Bottom left) Brisbane city traffic Shutterstock/ State of the Nation 2017. (Right) Labor Senator Sam Dastyari in the Senate 5 chinasong. (Bottom right) British Prime Minister Theresa May Shutterstock/ December, 2017. AAP image/Mick Tsikas Frederic Legrand. Page 33: (left and right) Greens Senators Larissa Waters and Scott Ludlum, Page 6: (Top right) light rail, Newcastle. Shutterstock/Michael Leslie. (Bottom Senate Question Time, 21 June 2017. AAP Image/Mick Tsikas. (Centre) Deputy right) Australian house construction. Shutterstock/Lloyd Thornton. Prime Minister the Hon. Barnaby Joyce MP, CEDA State of the Nation 2014: Page 8: CEDA collection CEDA collection. Page 15: road construction Shutterstock/Lev Kropoov Page 34: Megan David, Pat Anderson from the Referendum Council with a piti holding the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and Noel Pearson, during the closing Page 18: (Left) Sydney Barangaroo Shutterstock/Gareth Locke.
    [Show full text]
  • Re Day [No 2] (2017) 343 Alr 181
    James Morgan* PROTECTING DEMOCRATIC INTEGRITY: RE DAY [NO 2] (2017) 343 ALR 181 I INTRODUCTION ection 44(v) of the Australian Constitution is one of several express provisions imposing candidacy restrictions for the Australian Federal Parliament, and has San important role to play in the protection of representative and responsible government. This particular section operates to disqualify any person with a pecuniary interest in an agreement with the Commonwealth Public Service, from being elected or sitting as a Commonwealth parliamentarian. The provision had previously only been considered by the High Court of Australia once, in the case of Re Webster,1 in which an interpretation so narrow as to rob the provision of all practical impact was adopted. Following decades of criticism, the High Court adopted a broader con- struction of s 44(v) in the case of Re Day [No 2],2 a constitutional challenge to the eligibility of an Australian Senator. This case note, after reviewing the background of Re Day [No 2], turns to analysis of the Court’s decision and the resulting ramifications. For so long, the narrow interpre- tation of s 44(v) has rendered the provision functionally inert and without purpose. While Re Day [No 2] leaves significant ambiguity regarding s 44(v)’s outer limits, it nevertheless marks a long overdue development in the interpretation of the Australian Constitution, by extending the provision to the prohibition of certain conflicts of interest for Commonwealth parliamentarians. This broader construction of s 44(v) reinforces the duty of Australian elected representatives to serve the interests of the people above their own — yielding a positive outcome for the protection of represen- tative and responsible government.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Nationality and Parliamentary Eligibility in Japanese and Australian Law MULTIPLE NATIONALITY and PARLIAMENTARY ELIGIBILITY
    Multiple Nationality and Parliamentary Eligibility in Japanese and Australian Law MULTIPLE NATIONALITY AND PARLIAMENTARY ELIGIBILITY Yasuhiro Okuda* / Trevor Ryan** Yasuhiro Okuda / Trevor Ryan Introduction I. Japanese Law 1. Nationality of Taiwanese 2. Applicability of Unrecognized Government’s Law 3. Election of One Nationality Under the Nationality Act 4. Eligibility of Multiple Nationals to Public Office II. Australian Law 1. Dual Nationality and Disqualification from Parliament 2. Sykes v Cleary 3. Re Canavan 4. Reform Options Conclusion INTRODUCTION Multiple nationality arises often from cross-cultural marriage of parents under the jus sanguinis rule found in Japanese law on the one hand, and from the birth of children to foreign residents in national territory under the jus soli rule found in Australian law on the other hand. Interestingly, despite such different nationality laws, the parliamentary eligibility of multiple nationals has become topical in both countries in recent times. For a long time, foreign residents in Japan numbered fewer than one mil- lion, and most of these were Koreans and Taiwanese who came as Japanese nationals before World War II, when Korea and Taiwan were a part of Japa- nese territory, as well as their descendants.1 They are generally called ‘old comers’.2 However, since the late 1980s foreign residents have rapidly in- * Prof. Dr. Yasuhiro Okuda, Chūō University, Law School, Japan. ** Ass. Prof. Dr. Trevor Ryan, School of Law & Justice, University of Canberra, Aus- tralia. 1 According to the Nihon Tōkei Nenkan [Japan Statistical Yearbook], 664,536 Kore- ans and 52,896 Chinese (most of them Taiwanese) made up 91.6 percent of 782,910 foreign residents in 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Proportional Representation in Theory and Practice the Australian Experience
    Proportional Representation in Theory and Practice The Australian Experience Glynn Evans Department of Politics and International Relations School of Social Sciences The University of Adelaide June 2019 Table of Contents Abstract ii Statement of Authorship iii Acknowledgements iv Preface vi 1. Introduction 1 2. District Magnitude, Proportionality and the Number of 30 Parties 3. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in the 57 Senate 4. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in Western 102 Australia 5. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in South Eastern Jurisdictions 132 6. Proportional Representation and Minor Parties: Some 170 Deviating Cases 7. Does Proportional Representation Favour 204 Independents? 8. Proportional Representation and Women – How Much 231 Help? 9. Conclusion 247 Bibliography 251 Appendices 260 i Abstract While all houses of Australian parliaments using proportional representation use the Single Transferable Vote arrangement, district magnitudes (the numbers of members elected per division) and requirements for casting a formal vote vary considerably. Early chapters of this thesis analyse election results in search for distinct patterns of proportionality, the numbers of effective parties and partisan advantage under different conditions. This thesis argues that while district magnitude remains the decisive factor in determining proportionality (the higher the magnitude, the more proportional the system), ballot paper numbering requirements play a more important role in determining the number of (especially) parliamentary parties. The general pattern is that, somewhat paradoxically, the more freedom voters have to choose their own preference allocations, or lack of them, the smaller the number of parliamentary parties. Even numbered magnitudes in general, and six member divisions in particular, provide some advantage to the Liberal and National Parties, while the Greens are disadvantaged in five member divisions as compared to six or seven member divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • ECAJ Report on Antisemitism in Australia in 2017
    REPORT on ANTISEMITISM in AUSTRALIA 2017 1 October 2016 – 30 September 2017 Researched, written and compiled by JULIE NATHAN Research Officer, Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) The Executive Council of Australian Jewry is the elected national representative organisation of the Australian Jewish Community. This document should not be reproduced or distributed, and the original work not quoted, without the express permission of the author. © Executive Council of Australian Jewry PO Box 1114, Edgecliff, NSW 2027 Phone: 02 8353 8500 Email: [email protected] Incidents of antisemitism occurring in Australia can be reported directly to Julie Nathan at [email protected] Published by ECAJ, and funded by ECAJ Public Fund, a public fund listed on the Register of Harm Prevention Charities under Subdivision 30-EA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. 26 November 2017 ISSN 2208-1917 (Online) 1 One of several antisemitic posters distributed around Australia in 2016 and 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 7 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 7 Current Situation for Jews in Australia - Security ............................................................... 9 Selection Criteria for Inclusion in the Report ...................................................................... 9 Antisemitism: Incidents and Discourse ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Parliament House in 2016: a Chronology of Events
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2017–18 14 DECEMBER 2017 Australia's Parliament House in 2016: a chronology of events Anna Hough Politics and Public Administration Section with Dr Dianne Heriot, Parliamentary Librarian Introduction Parliament House, which was officially opened in 1988, is the home of the Parliament of Australia. It is located on a 32-hectare site on Capital Hill in Canberra. In 2013 the Parliamentary Library published a chronology of events, Australia’s Parliament House—More Than 25 Years in the Making!, in recognition of the building’s 25th anniversary. Australia’s Parliament House in 2014 and 2015: a Chronology of Events highlighted significant milestones associated with Australia’s Parliament House and the Parliament itself between January 2014 and December 2015. This chronology continues the story, commencing in January 2016 and finishing in December 2016. This chronology of events has been compiled from published sources and includes images and links to audio- visual and documentary records. Appendix 1 presents a list of key legislation passed by the Commonwealth Parliament in 2016. Abbreviations AG Australian Greens ALP Australian Labor Party DHJP Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party FFP Family First Party Hon. Honourable Ind. Independent JLN Jacqui Lambie Network Lib. Liberal Party of Australia NP The Nationals NXT Nick Xenophon Team PHON Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Retd Retired ISSN 2203-5249 Milestones Details 2 February Infants in the House The Leader of the House of Representatives, Christopher Pyne (Lib., Sturt, SA) introduces the necessary changes to amend Standing Order 257 to allow infants to be brought into the House of Representatives Chamber and the Federation Chamber by members.
    [Show full text]
  • Odgers' Australian Senate Practice
    ODGERS’ Australian Senate Practice As revised by Harry Evans Second supplement to the 14th edition Updates to 31 July 2020 Odgers’ Australian Senate Practice As revised by Harry Evans Second supplement to the 14th edition Updates to 31 July 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 ISBN 978-1-76093-088-2 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Author: Odgers, J. R. (James Rowland), 1914-1985. Title: Odgers’ Australian Senate practice / As revised by Harry Evans / edited by Rosemary Laing. Edition: 14th ed. ISBN: 978-1-76010-503-7 Notes: Includes index. Subjects: Australia. Parliament. Senate--Rules and practice. Other Authors/Contributors: Evans, Harry, 1946-2014 Laing, Rosemary, 1956- Australia. Parliament. Department of the Senate. Dewey Number: 328.94 Printed by CanPrint Communications Pty Limited, Canberra Available at aph.gov.au/Odgers Supplements to the 14th edition: Supplement Updates to 30 June 2019 ISBN: 978-1-76010-997-4 Second supplement Updates to 31 July 2020 Printed by the Department of the Senate, Canberra. Introduction This second supplement updates to 31 July 2020 material in the 14th edition of Odgers’ Australian Senate Practice. Notable matters covered in this supplement include: • the dual citizenship saga of the 45th Parliament; the disqualification of 10 senators who had been candidates for the 2016 election; and each House establishing a Qualifications Register • consideration of claims of parliamentary privilege over material seized under search warrant • the Senate's Regulations and Ordinances Committee renamed to reflect its evolving remit for the scrutiny of delegated legislation • changes to the Senate's routine of business, and a reduction in speaking times for many debates, and • procedural variations to observe public health advice on social distancing and hygiene following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Regulation Research Network Newsletter April 2017
    Electoral Regulation Research Network Newsletter E RRN Electoral Regulation Research Network April 2017 MELBOURNE LAW SCHOOL 2 Director’s Message 3 Electoral News 13 Research Collaboration Initiative 14 Forthcoming Events Re Day [2017] HCA 2 15 Event Reports Re Culleton [2017] HCA 3 17 Working Papers Re Culleton (No 2) [2017] HCA 4 Victorian Electoral Commission v Municipal 18 Recent Publications Electoral Tribunal (2017) VCAT 294 19 Case Notes Director’s Message ‘Populism’ has clearly become a dirty word after Brexit and the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States. Commenting on the government’s withdrawal of China-Australia extradition treaty from ratification, Mark Kenny, The Age’s national affairs editors said: The trouble with populism is that it invites more of the same. Sober leadership becomes unfashionable, even dangerous. Principles are sent on vacation. Courage is deported. If these are the only meanings of ‘populism’ then there is only occasion for deprecation. But perhaps, we can gain better insight by attending to other meanings of ‘populism’. The Cambridge English Dictionary, for instance, defines ‘populism’ as: political ideas and activities that are intended to get the support of ordinary people by giving them what they want. To be granted, ‘ordinary people’ can often be a site of myths and fictions. But if one meaning of ‘populism’ is that found in the Cambridge English Dictionary, we should not be too quick to deride ‘populism’. After all, isn’t responsiveness to the wishes and concerns of citizens an essential element of democracy? This brings us to a significant critique of ‘populism’ – the system of government is not working in the interests of ‘ordinary people’ because it has been captured by the elite.
    [Show full text]
  • Iii the Zombie Apocalypse: Australia’S Best Chance at Patent Reform?
    Volume 14(1) – 2016 Editor: Robert MacLean Student Editors: Ben Vader Duff Isabella Heilikmann Liv Hume Erina Fletcher FOREWORD Isabella Heilikmann ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE TIMELINE WILL THE REAL ZOMBIE TAX PLEASE STAND UP! Editors Olivia Hume PROPOSED ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE LAW REFORMS TO WHAT EXTENT SHOULD WE EXTEND HUMAN RIGHTS TO ZOMBIES? Contributors Erina Fletcher PART I: REFEREED ARTICLES PROTECTING THE INFECTED. GOVERNMENT ACQUISITION OF CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF A PATENTS DURING THE ZOMBIE ZOMBIE OUTBREAK APOCALYPSE Dr Bede Harris Benjamin Duff IS THE ZOMBIE MY NEIGHBOUR? THE ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE AS A LENS FOR PART III: SUPPLEMENTAL ZOMBIE UNDERSTANDING LEGAL PERSONHOOD MATERIALS Bruce Baer Arnold UNATURAL DISASTERS: EMERGENCY Zombie Isaacs designed by Joe Mikus MANAGEMENT IN A TIME OF ZOMBIES Robert MacLean PART II: REFEREED STUDENT ARTICLES ESCAPING THE SEA OF ZOMBIES: LESSONS LEARNED FROM CLIMATE CHANGE REFUGEES 1 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Copyright © University of Canberra and individual authors 2017 This journal issue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/> 2 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Canberra Law Review (2016) 14(1) Canberra Law Review Welcome to the 2016 edition of the Canberra Law Review. No apology is needed if you skipped the foreword and went straight to the articles, it is after all the human thing to do (though it may be an incorrect assumption that all our readers are human). The 2016 Canberra Law Review was an opportunity to experiment with the teaching of law. On one level, it was an opportunity to conduct a Gedankenexperiment, encouraging students and colleagues to consider how a global zombie apocalypse would impact Australian law.
    [Show full text]
  • Canberra // Issue 88 Letter From
    Issue 88 20 December, 2016 to 4 February 2017 Letter from CanberrSaving you time for nine years. a When Dacey Rode the Mule BY PATERSON, A. B., 'BANJO' 'Twas to a small, up-country town, When we were boys at school, There came a circus with a clown, Likewise a bucking mule. The clown announced a scheme they had Spectators for to bring — They'd give a crown to any lad Who'd ride him round the ring. The band struck up with “Killaloe”, And, gentle reader, do not scoff And “Rule Britannia, Rule”, Nor think a man a fool — And “Young Man from the Country”, too, To buck a porous-plaster off When Dacey rode the mule. Was pastime to that mule. Then Dacey, in a furious rage, The boys got on; he bucked like sin; For vengeance on the show He threw them in the dirt, Ascended to the monkeys' cage What time the clown would raise a grin And let the monkeys go; By asking, “Are you hurt?” The blue-tailed ape and chimpanzee But Johnny Dacey came one night, He turned abroad to roam; The crack of all the school; Good faith! It was a sight to see The people step for home. Said he, “I'll win the crown all right, The elephant went off his trunk, Bring in your bucking mule.” The monkey played the fool, For big baboons with canine snout And all the band got blazing drunk Are spiteful, as a rule — When Dacey rode the mule. The people didn't sit it out When Dacey rode the mule.
    [Show full text]