Start up Programme Estimate Analyses of Cross River
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ACTIVITY 5: START UP PROGRAMME ESTIMATE ANALYSES OF CROSS RIVER STATE DEVELOPMENT MODEL: ITS SUSTAINABILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS TO CROSSCUTTING ISSUES OF GENDER, POVERTY, ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL WELFARE. FINAL REPORT Submitted By: Dr. Uwem Essia 08035500591 [email protected] (Consultant) To: The State Coordinator Support to Reforming Institutions Programme (SRIP) Cross River State 2006 TABLE OF CONTENT Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………………1 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………. .. 4 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Preamble…………………………………….…………………………………..……6 1.2 The Research Problem…………………….………………………………………….8 1.3 Objective of the Assignment…………….…………………………………………...9 1.4 Method of Research…………………….…………………………………………. 9 1.5 Significance of the Assignment……………………………………………………...10 1.6 Organization of the Report………………………………………………………….. 11 CHAPTER TWO: FRAMEWORK FOR MODELING DEVELOPMENT IN CROSS RIVER STATE 2.1 The Perspective of Modern Development…………………………………………...12 2.1.1 The Cultural Economy of Modern Development………………………………….13 2.1.2 Components of a Sound Development Model for Cross River State……………. 14 2.2 Structure of a Development Model…………………………………………………...15 2.3 The Cross River State Development Model………………………………………….16 2.3.1 Government Intervention and Model Outcomes…………………………………...17 2.4 Funding Development in Cross River State………………………………………….18 CHAPTER THREE: REVIEW OF SEEDS DOCUMENT 3.1 NEEDS and the EC Donor Strategy ………………………………………………21 3.1.1 Macroeconomic Framework of NEEDS…………………………………………22 3.1.2 Sustainability and Responsiveness of NEEDS/CR-SEEDS to Crosscutting Issues of Gender, Poverty, Environment, and Social Welfare……………………………………………………… …………………………22 3.1.3 EC (Donor) Strategy and NEEDS……………………………………. …………26 3.2 SEEDS as a Development Strategy…………………………………………………28 3.2.1 General Assessment of CR-SEEDS………………………………………………31 3.3 Challenges of Development in Cross River State…………………………………..33 CHAPTER FOUR: COORDINATION OF DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMMES IN CROSS RIVER STATE 4.1 Lead State/Donor Partnership Initiative…………… ………………………………37 4.2 Coordination of EC Activities in Cross River State… ………………………….39 4.2.1 Shared Values of all EC Projects…………… ………………………………… .41 4.2.2 Proposals for Cooperation among EC Partners in the State………………………41 CHAPTER FIVE: REFORMS OF THE BUDGET PROCESS IN CROSS RIVER STATE 5.1 Anatomy of the Budget Process…………………………………………………….43 5.2 Budget and Planning Institutions: Proposals for Support for Reforming Institutions Programme………………………………………………….…………………………...45 5.2.1 State Planning Commissions …………………………………………….46 5.2.2 Budget Office……………………………………………………………………...49 5.2.3 Ministry of Finance………………………………………………………………..50 5.2.4 Office of the State Accountant-General………………………………………….51 5.2.5 Office of the State Auditor General………………………………………………51 1 5.2.6 Office of the Auditor-General for Local Government……………………………52 5.2.7 The State House of Assembly …………………………………………………53 5.2.8 Office of the Head of Service …..…………………………………….54 5.2.9 Ministry of Local Government Affairs……………………………………… ….55 5.2.10 Selected Local Government Areas……………………………………………….55 5.2.11 Proposal for Reform of Local Governments………………………… …………57 5.2.12 Civil Society Organizations ………………………………… ……58 5.2.13 Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development …………… ………….59 5.2.14 Mainstreaming Gender and Concerns for Disadvantaged Groups …… ……….60 5.2.15 Water and Sanitation Sectors (Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency) ……61 5.2.16 Proposed Reforms in the Water and Sanitation Sectors… ……………………..63 5.3 Selected Related Service Institutions 5.3.1 Ministry of Health………………………………………………………………… 64 5.3.2 Ministry of Education……………………………………………………………. 65 5.3.3 Tourism Bureau………………………………………………………………… .65 5.3.4 Ministry of Agriculture ……………………………………………………… 66 5.3.5Management Development Institute………………………………… …… …...67 CHAPTER SIX: SRIP/CRS PARTNERSHIP: COMMITMENTS, RISKS, CONSTRAINTS, AND EXPECTATIONS 6.1 SRIP’s Commitment to its Partners………………………………………………..68 6.2 Risks of SRIP Partnership………………………………………………………….68 6.3 Constraints of SRIP Partnership……………………………………………………69 6.4 Expectation of SRIP Partnership………………………………………………… . 69 CHAPTER SEVEN: SUMMARY OF MAJOR FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND CONCLUSION 6.1 Summary of Major Findings………………………………………………………71 6.2 Recommendations for Revising Existing Development Models………………….71 6.3 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………72 Appendix I List of Acronyms ……………………………………………………………………..72 Appendix II List of Persons Interviewed……………………………………………………………74 Appendix III List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………..76 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Analysis of Consolidated Financial Statement (1999-2004)………………..19 Table 2 Nigeria: Selected Indicator of Macroeconomic Performance (2004)……. ... 26 Table 3 Development Partner Activities in Cross River State (by NEEDS Pillars)…38 Table 4 Proposal for Reform of State Planning Commission………………………..48 Annexures Annex I………………………………………………………………………………..76 Annex II……………………………………………………………………………….77 Annex III……………………………………………………………………………. 78 Annex IV………………………………………………………………………………79 Annex V……………………………………………………………………………….80 Annex VI………………………………………………………………………………81 Annex VII……………………………………………………………………………...82 2 Acknowledgement The efforts of several individuals, groups and government departments went into the preparation of this report. It would be difficult to mention all of them. A few however must be mentioned. The most deserving Mr. Afzal Yearoo, whose leadership, vision and commitment to his job as State Coordinator of SRIP provided the leadership and support required for success in this assignment. Afzal displayed an inestimable commitment to this assignment. In addition, his earlier report on the Institutional Needs Assessment provided the lead that made the task of this assignment much easier to accomplish. The support, comments, and wise counsel of Mrs. Margaret Ebokpo, Deputy State Coordinator, SRIP were equally helpful. The other employees of SRIP – Jenny and Prince offered one assistance or the other and are here acknowledged. The Vice Chairman and Secretary of the State Planning Commission, Ntufam John Omori and Mr. Charles Achu supported the assignments with their valuable insights and experience of the development process in the State. Equally helpful were the contributions of Chief Budget Office, Mr. Josephat Oga, and Permanent Secretaries of Ministries of Local Government Affairs, Finance, Agriculture, Education, Health, Environment, and Trade and Investment. Equally, the State Tourism Bureau, Tinapa Project Office, Forestry Commission, Internal Revenue Service, and Office of the Head of Service provided valuable inputs. Officials of the focal Local Government Areas visited; Boki, Yakurr, and Odukpani were on hand to provide information that was fully described their budgeting procedures and those of the remaining two – Obubra and Etung. Inputs were also obtained from the Strategy Papers of EC and other Donors. The NEEDS, CR-SEEDS and LEEDS documents, Consolidated Accounts of Cross River State, and SEEDS benchmarking exercise report of 2005, served as the main working documents. A book, Contemporary Approaches to Public Budgeting by Fred A. Kramer (Winthrop, Cambridge, 1979) provided a lot of insight on the proposed framework for budgeting and policy programming. The consultant equally benefited from his numerous publications experience in knowledge and neo-technology economics, and human development – his current areas of research interest. The contribution, inputs, and views of others notwithstanding, the consultant takes personal responsibility for content, possible errors, and conclusions that are contained in this report. 3 Executive Summary This assignment, Activity 5: Start Up Programme Estimate, Analyses of Cross River State Development Model: Its Sustainability and Responsiveness to Crosscutting Issues of Gender, Poverty, Environment and Social Welfare, was meant to provide background information to guide SRIP intervention initiatives in Cross River State. The global objective of this assignment was to conduct an analysis of the state development model, assessing its sustainability and responsiveness to crosscutting issues of gender, poverty, environment, and social welfare. The vision of CR-SEEDS is to make Cross River State the most prosperous state in Nigeria. The major development goals of the state are poverty eradication and job creation, tourism development, and growing the private sector. The state has identified tourism, agriculture, and infrastructural development as the lead activities and sectors. Notwithstanding the tremendous achievements recorded so far, a lot more still needs to be done to improve the living conditions of the poor and make development sustainable. There is hope, however, that current investments in tourism, infrastructural development, and agriculture will soon yield dividends to place the State first in the ranks of states in Nigeria. Realizing the vision and hopes of tourism and agricultural development calls for continuity and steadfastness in the key development and social transformation projects. So far it would appear that successes recorded are largely dependent on the self-will and personal drive of the indefatigable Governor Donald Duke whose tenure as Governor expires in May 2007. Continuity and sustainability demands that the engines of development and social change be placed on capacities, incentives, and institutions, rather than the efforts and drives of any single individual. Budgeting and public