Project Sea Dragon Stage 1 Hatchery Coastal Environment and Impact Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Sea Dragon Stage 1 Hatchery Coastal Environment and Impact Assessment Project Sea Dragon Stage 1 Hatchery Coastal Environment and Impact Assessment Seafarms Group Limited October 2017 Document Status Version Doc type Reviewed by Approved by Date issued v01 Draft Report Christine Arrowsmith Christine Arrowsmith 08/09/2017 V02 Draft Report Christine Arrowsmith Christine Arrowsmith 9/10/2017 V03 FINAL Christine Arrowsmith Christine Arrowsmith 24/10/2017 V04 FINAL Christine Arrowsmith Christine Arrowsmith 26/10/2017 Project Details Project Name Stage 1 Hatchery Coastal Environment and Impact Assessment Client Seafarms Group Limited Client Project Manager Ivor Gutmanis Water Technology Project Manager Elise Lawry, Joanna Garcia-Webb Water Technology Project Director Christine Lauchlan-Arrowsmith Authors EAL, PXZ, JGW Document Number 3894-26_R01v03_GunnPt_NOI.docx COPYRIGHT Water Technology Pty Ltd has produced this document in accordance with instructions from Seafarms Group Limited for their use only. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Water Technology Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without written permission of Water Technology Pty Ltd constitutes an infringement of copyright. Water Technology Pty Ltd does not warrant this document is definitive nor free from error and does not accept liability for any loss caused, or arising from, reliance upon the information provided herein. 15 Business Park Drive Notting Hill VIC 3168 Telephone (03) 8526 0800 Fax (03) 9558 9365 ACN 093 377 283 ABN 60 093 377 283 04_GunnPt_NOI 26_R01v - 3894 Seafarms Group Limited | October 2017 Stage 1 Hatchery Coastal Environment and Impact Assessment Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Sea Dragon is a proposed large scale, integrated, land based prawn aquaculture venture operating across northern Australia. At full production, the proponent, Seafarms Group Limited (Seafarms), intends to provide 100,000 tonnes of prawns to the Australian and Asian markets annually. Water Technology Pty Ltd has been commissioned by Seafarms to undertake an assessment of the existing physical processes, environmental values and water quality of the coastal environment and the impact upon these processes and environment of the proposed Stage 1 Hatchery, to be located at Gunn Point. The proposed Gunn Point Stage 1 Hatchery is to be located on Murrumujuk Drive between the Tree Point Conservation area and the former Gunn Point Prison Farm, as shown in Figure 1-1. The current proposal includes construction of land based facilities, an intake pipe and pump facility to draw water into the facility and a discharge pipe and flow control to cycle water from the facility back to the open waters of Shoal Bay. The discharge will be equivalent to the volume of water drawn from the ocean to circulate through the facility. This will be on average 954 kL/day. The waters around the site comprise of Shoal Bay to the west and Hope Inlet to the south. A number of freshwater waterways flow into Shoal Bay and Hope Inlet, with Howard Springs Creek the most notable waterway. Minor creeks drain across Murrumujuk to the north of the facility. The freshwater waterways are presented in Figure 1-2. The study involved a desktop literature review, physical data collection and numerical modelling. The existing coastal environment is described in Section 2. The potential impacts of the proposed facility and their control measures are summarised below. A full description can be found in Sections 4 to 6. Potential Impacts & Mitigation - Coastal Values The main coastal features at Gunn Point that could be potentially impacted by the proposed facility are in the vicinity of the intake and discharge pipe location. Both pipes will be buried under the dune and out as far as possible through the intertidal zone via directional drilling. Offshore, once directional drilling is no longer possible, they will be placed on the seabed. There is potential that the pipe could interrupt sediment transport within the intertidal zone. This could lead to a change in the configuration of the intertidal flats as material accumulates on either side of the pipe, and a net loss of material is experienced away from the pipe. There may be some visual disturbance due to the construction of the pipe, in an area with a low level of development. The presence of the pipes in this area could impede navigation of recreational vessels in the area. Control Measures The following actions are recommended to ensure there is minimal impact of the project on the coastal values around Gunn Point: Ensuring adequate scour protection is provided in the design of the pipe bedding Minimise the visual impact of the pipe across the intertidal bank by extending the buried section of pipeline as far offshore as possible. 04_GunnPt_NOI Employ directional drilling as a method of pipeline construction to minimise impacts to vegetation Install navigational markers to notify boaters of the potential hazard of the pipeline 26_R01v - 3894 Seafarms Group Limited | October 2017 Stage 1 Hatchery Coastal Environment and Impact Assessment Page 3 Potential Impacts & Mitigation – Bathymetry, Sediment Transport & Coastal Processes Placement of the intake pipe on the bed will result in minor and localised changes to the bathymetry in deeper water due to scour and deposition. More significant changes could be observed in the intertidal region where sediments are more mobile, however this is still expected to be relatively minor. Discharge flows have the potential to cause scour of the bed, however it is unlikely due to the low flow rate. Control Measures The intake and discharge pipes will be buried underneath the dune and across the intertidal zone. To minimise impacts to the coastal processes, these should be buried as far offshore as possible. Ensure adequate scour protection is provided in the design of the pipe bedding and construction. Mitigate the potential for scour across the discharge point by ensuring appropriate scour protection is considered during the detailed design phase. Potential Impacts & Mitigation – Oceanographic Conditions The macro tidal environment within Shoal Bay means that the potential changes to tidal water levels and currents associated with the intake or discharge are extremely low. The tidal prism (i.e. the volume of water which is exchanged during each tide) in the vicinity of Gunn Point north of Hope Inlet is of the order of 4 x 107 m3 during a spring tide and 4 x 106 m3 during a neap tide. During a single tide, the intake pipe will remove approximately 500 m3 of water from Gunn Point (over approximately 12 hours) at the ultimate development state. This represents 0.001% of the tidal prism during a spring tide and 0.01% during a neap tide and is thus unlikely to have any impact on tidal water levels or currents. High tidal currents will necessitate the armouring of the intake pipe to the bed to prevent damage through movement. Rock armouring along the pipeline, or concrete braces could be considered. Control Measures Removal and discharge of seawater through the intake / discharge pipes is unlikely to result in any changes to the hydrodynamic conditions. Design of adequate anchoring of the pipes will be required to ensure they are stable. Potential Impacts & Mitigation – Water Quality The Water Quality Objectives for Darwin Harbour recommend the water quality that supports the maintenance of the ecosystem, and are designated under Part 7 of the N.T. Water Act as a local guideline level in accordance with the National Water Quality Management Strategy (NWSMS) and Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) guidelines (DENR, 2016). The estuary classifications of upper, mid and outer are defined by flushing times (DENR, 2009): Upper estuary zones are considered poorly flushed, with residence times over 32 days. Mid estuary zones have greater mixing, with residences times between 14 and 32 days. Outer estuary areas have considerable mixing with the ocean; residence times are less than 14 days. Outer Estuary objectives can be applied to areas offshore from Gunn Point and Shoal Bay, and in the outer 04_GunnPt_NOI areas of Hope Inlet. The flushing times at various locations within Hope Inlet were assessed to categorise that area (Section 3.2.1); the assessment revealed that mid-estuary objectives apply further upstream within Hope Inlet. Background concentrations and water quality objectives for upper and mid-estuary are presented in the 26_R01v - table below. 3894 Seafarms Group Limited | October 2017 Stage 1 Hatchery Coastal Environment and Impact Assessment Page 4 Parameter Background Concentration (g/L) Darwin Harbour WQO (g/L) Mid Estuary TN 230 270 TP 15 20 Chlorophyll a 2.1 2 (3.4) Outer Estuary TN 160 440 TP 8 20 Chlorophyll a 0.5 1 The above table indicates the background mid-estuary chlorophyll a concentration is above the corresponding water quality objective. When defining performance objectives, in accordance with National Guidelines (ANZECC 2000), there is an accepted hierarchy of documentation in this regard. This hierarchy requires that where there are no locally specific guidelines (which would require comprehensive local water quality data collection typically spanning at least a 1 to 2-year period), management decisions should default to relevant State based guidelines, and in their absence to National guidelines. In this instance, local monitoring has been undertaken to obtain the background concentrations. Given the Darwin Harbour WQO is assigned to the full harbour system, including Shoal Bay and Hope Inlet, it is proposed that the WQO objective be adjusted at this location for the purposes of this assessment. The upper-estuary Darwin Harbour WQO is 4 g/L, and the mid-estuary WQO 2g/L. Examination of the available water quality data indicates an 80th percentile value of 3.4g/L. Using the 80th percentile as an objective is in line with the recommendations in the National Guidelines. This value sits between the mid and upper WQOs, which appears to be a reasonable interim trigger value to adopt on this basis.
Recommended publications
  • Keynote Speakers
    Brenton Bay Lethbridge Bay Dundas Shark Bay Strait Snake Bay Greenhill Island GordGoGordondon Bay MELVILLE ISLAND Endyalgout Island BATHURSTBATHURSTURU ISLAND Van Diemen Gulf BeagBeaglele GulGGulf Clarence Strait Adamm Bay East Alligator Chambersrs BayBa River Shoal Bay TiTimormor SeSeaa Southh DARWIN West Alligatoro P AAdAdelAdeAdelaideddeldeeel laideaidaaiididdee RRiRivRiveriviveerr Alligator RiverRiver o r River t D a rw in B yn oe H arbour FFogFooogg BBayBaayay Mary River Finnissn s RivRiverv South Alligator PPeroPePeronon IsIslandslandla AdAAdelaide RRiveri River Margaret River AAnsonnson BBayy McKinlay Dalyy RivRiververr River Mary River THE AUSTRALIAN CURRICULUM STUDIES ASSOCIATION (ACSA) 2013 BIENNIAL CURRICULUM CONFERENCE Uncharted territory? Navigating the new Australian Curriculumcul KEYNOTE SPEAKERS This conference explores the Australian Curriculum’s cross-curriculum priorities of: Ī Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures Ī Asia and Australia’s engagement with Asia Ī Sustainability The conference opens at Parliament House, Mitchell Street, Darwin and continues at the Darwin Convention Centre, Stokes Hill Road, Darwin 9.00 am Wednesday 25 September to 3.30 pm Friday 27 September 2013 KEYNOTES ACSA — 2013 BIENNIAL CONFERENCE: 25–27 SEPTEMBER 2013, DARWIN Dr Miriam-Rose Ungunmerr Baumann AM with Mrs Sharon Duong, Deputy Director: Teaching and Learning, and Ms Julianne Willis, Education Consultant: School Improvement, both of the Catholic Education Offi ce, NT Heart, mind and spirit In her keynote address on Indigenous perspectives across the curriculum, Miriam Rose Baumann will be joined by colleagues in a conversation that will challenge us to be mindful that curriculum should involve Heart, mind and spirit. Miriam Rose has had to make a balance of some kind to feel comfortable walking in two worlds — to feel comfortable in the western world and with her people.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryozoa, Cheilostomata, Lanceoporidae) from the Gulf of Carpentaria and Northern Australia, with Description of a New Species
    Zootaxa 3827 (2): 147–169 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3827.2.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D9AEB652-345E-4BB2-8CBD-A3FB4F92C733 Six species of Calyptotheca (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata, Lanceoporidae) from the Gulf of Carpentaria and northern Australia, with description of a new species ROBYN L. CUMMING1 & KEVIN J. TILBROOK2 Museum of Tropical Queensland, 70–102 Flinders Street, Townsville, Queensland, 4810, Australia 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 2Current address: Research Associate, Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, UK Abstract A new diagnosis is presented for Calyptotheca Harmer, 1957 and six species are described from the Gulf of Carpentaria: C. wasinensis (Waters, 1913) (type species), C. australis (Haswell, 1880), C. conica Cook, 1965 (with a redescription of the holotype), C. tenuata Harmer, 1957, C. triquetra (Harmer, 1957) and C. lardil n. sp. These are the first records of Bryo- zoa from the Gulf of Carpentaria, and the first Australian records for C. wasinensis, C. tenuata and C. triquetra. The limit of distribution of three species is extended east to the Gulf of Carpentaria, from Kenya for C. wasinensis, from China for C. tenuata, and from northwestern Australia for C. conica. The number of tropical Calyptotheca species in Australian ter- ritorial waters is increased from seven to eleven. Key words: Timor Sea, Arafura Sea, Beagle Gulf, tropical Australia, Indo-Pacific Introduction Knowledge of tropical Australian Bryozoa is mostly restricted to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and Torres Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroscheme Industry Partnership Program (HIPP)
    HydroScheme Industry Partnership Program (HIPP) National Hydrographic Program Commander Nigel Townsend, RAN CPHS1 Assistant Director National Hydrographic Program The Need – Meeting Australia’s Obligations Defence has a long history of hydrographic survey and an ongoing obligation to the Nation: - United Nations Convention on the Law of the SEA (UNCLOS) - International Convention for the Safety of Life at SEA (SOLAS) - Navigation Act 2012 Demand is growing for a whole-of-Nation hydrographic and oceanographic data collection program Environmental data gathering requires significant investment - Greater demand drives a need to partner with Industry Current processes and way of doing business needs to change significantly to meet Australia’s current and future requirements HydroScheme Industry Partnership Program (HIPP) HIPP Strategic Objectives: - To obtain full, high quality EEZ bathy coverage by 2050 - To link Chart Datum to National Ellipsoid through development of AusHydriod by 2030 - Integrate HIPP activities into the National Plan for MBES Bathy Data Acquisition - Provide environmental data to baseline Australia’s marine estate - Support hydrographic survey of remote locations (AAT, Heard and McDonald Is) - Support development of an organic tertiary hydrographic education program - Build the Hydrographic Industry in Australia - Support regional capacity building programs - Adhere to intent of Aust Gov’s Data Availability and Use Policy HIPP - Phases HIPP has two major phases: - HIPP Phase 1: 2020 – 2024 (Ramp-up Period) - Priority
    [Show full text]
  • Three Aboriginal Shell Mounds at Hope Inlet: Evidence for Coastal, Not Maritime Late Holocene Economies on the Beagle Gulf Mainland, Northern Australia
    Three Aboriginal shell mounds at Hope Inlet: Evidence for coastal, not maritime Late Holocene economies on the Beagle Gulf mainland, northern Australia Patricia M. Bourke Abstract Many hundreds of Aboriginal shell mounds exist on the northern coasts of Australia. Though these archaeological features increasingly figure in broad constructions of past coastal hunter-gatherer economies, few have been analysed in any detail. This paper describes the excavation and analysis of three Anadara-dominated shell mounds situated in adjacent microenvironments at Hope Inlet, Shoal Bay near Darwin on the Northern Territory coast. These stratified deposits, formed over some 15 centuries between about 2000 and 500 years B.P., provide a relatively fine- grained record of subsistence and settlement strategies of hunter-gatherer peoples during this Late Holocene period. This study finds that these North Australian coastal groups practiced not a specialised marine or maritime subsistence economy focused on offshore resources, but a generalised and flexible coastal subsistence economy tied to the land. Introduction Many hundreds of Aboriginal shell mounds exist on Australia’s northern coasts. Though these archaeological features increasingly figure in broad constructions of past coastal hunter-gatherer economies, relatively few have been excavated and analysed in fine detail. This paper describes the excavation and analysis of three shell mounds at Hope Inlet, Shoal Bay on the Northern Territory coast near Darwin, undertaken in 1996 with the permission and help of traditional owners, the Larrakia community. The excavated sites are three of hundreds of mounds dominated by Location of Hope Inlet on the North Australian Anadara granosa shell, recorded during surveys for a PhD Figure 1 coast, showing places mentioned in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Azooxanthellate Scleractinia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) of Western Australia
    Records of the Western Australian Museum 18: 361-417 (1998). Azooxanthellate Scleractinia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) of Western Australia Stephen D. Cairns Department of Invertebrate Zoology, MRC-163, W-329, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560, USA Abstract - One hundred five species of azooxanthellate Scleractinia are known from Western Australia. Seventy of these species are reported herein as new records for Western Australia, 57 of which are also new to Australia. Eleven new species are described. The study was based on an examination of approximately 1725 specimens from 333 stations, which resulted in additional records of 98 of the 105 known species. New material was examined from six museums, as well as the historical material of Folkeson (1919) deposited at the Swedish Museum of Natural History. A majority (69/105 species) of the azooxanthellate species known from Western Australia occur in the tropical region of the Northern Australian Tropical Province (bordered to the south by the Houtrnan Abrolhos Islands and Port Gregory), which can be considered as a southern extension of the larger Indo-West Pacific tropical realm. Nine species are endemic to this region, and the highest latitudinal attrition of species occurs between Cape Jaubert and the Dampier Archipelago. Another 20 species, also known from tropical regions, extend to varying degrees into the Southern Australian Warm Temperate Province. Twelve species are restricted to warm temperate waters of the Southern Australian Warm Temperate Region, most of these species being relatively shallow in depth distribution. A majority of species (53) occur at depths shallower than 200 m, 46 occur exclusively deeper than 200 m (to 1011 m), and 6 species cross the 200 m isobath.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Oceanic Process and Natural Features
    EAW Expansion Project DEIS 8 8 Oceanic Process and Natural Features This chapter reports on the local physical oceanographic processes (Section 8.1); the potential impacts that the proposed dredging and coastal construction works are expected to impose on the oceanographic processes (Section 8.2); the management of impacts (Section 8.3); and project commitments (Section 8.4). The understanding of the potential impacts is mainly based on interpretation of hydrodynamic and wave model outcomes, as well as on numerical simulations of dredging and spoil disposal activities. 8.1 Existing Environment Darwin Harbour (Figure 8-1) is a large ria system, or drowned river valley, formed by post-glacial marine flooding of a dissected plateau. The Harbour was formed by rising sea levels about 6000 to 8000 years ago. The Harbour has a surface area of about 500 km2. In its southern and south-eastern portions, the harbour has three main components: East, West and Middle Arms, which merge into a single unit, along with the smaller Woods Inlet, before opening into Beagle Gulf to the north. The harbour extends for more than 30 km along this north-north-east – south-south-westerly oriented axis. The Elizabeth River flows into East Arm, while the Darwin and Blackmore rivers flow into Middle Arm. Freshwater inflow into the Harbour occurs from January to April, when estuarine conditions prevail in all areas (Hanley, 1988). The Darwin region is in general characterised by low, flat plateaus with an average elevation of about 15 m AHD, and occasional rises of up to 45 m AHD.
    [Show full text]
  • AQUACULTURE Development Opportunities
    land development corporation | develop tiwi PHOTO CREDIT: TOURISM NT AQUACULTURE development opportunities developtiwi.com.au OPPORTUNITIES FOR SEAFOOD Barramundi is considered an iconic fish of northern Australia. Barramundi is an Aboriginal word meaning “large scaled silver/river fish”. The Australian farmed barramundi industry started in the mid 1980s and barramundi is now farmed throughout Australia. Barramundi can be farmed in a number of ways, from indoor recirculating aquaculture (tanks) systems, to land-based pond operations and sea cages. The Tiwi Islands offers an abundance of both of these options for Barramundi farming. Mud Crabs are a highly regarded and valued food item in both Australia and Asia. Mud crab aquaculture is not currently undertaken in the Northern Territory but has been successfully carried out in a number of Asian countries. Mud Crab farming is generally based on catching juveniles from the wild and using them to stock mangrove enclosures, pens or ponds for grow out. The Darwin Aquaculture Centre has now made it feasible to supply juvenile crabs to farmers. With this development, opportunities now exist for pioneering investors to become involved in mud crab aquaculture. Sea Cucumber, also known as Trepang, is a prized delicacy throughout the Asia Pacific region. Trepang were historically harvested in the NT and traded with the Macassans dating as far back as the 1600s.The Darwin Aquaculture Centre is working with private enterprise and other organisations including Indigenous communities to find and develop suitable Trepang ranching sites in the NT. Prawns are a popular seafood and consumer demand is high. In the Northern Territory, the main species farmed is commonly known as the Black Tiger Prawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabed Habitats and Hazards of the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf and Timor Sea, Northern Australia
    GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Seabed Habitats and Hazards of the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf and Timor Sea, Northern Australia Rachel Przeslawski, James Daniell, Tara Anderson, J. Vaughn Barrie, Andrew Heap, Michael Hughes, Jin Li, Anna Potter, Lynda Radke, Record Justy Siwabessy, Maggie Tran, Tanya Whiteway and Scott Nichol 2011/40 GeoCat # 72805 APPLYING GEOSCIENCE TO AUSTRALIA’S MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGES Seabed Habitats and Hazards of the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf and Timor Sea, Northern Australia GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA RECORD 2011/40 by Rachel Przeslawski1, James Daniell1, Tara Anderson1, J. Vaughn Barrie2, Andrew Heap1, Michael Hughes3, Jin Li1, Anna Potter1, Lynda Radke1, Justy Siwabessy1, Maggie Tran1, Tanya Whiteway1, Scott Nichol1 1. Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601 2. Geological Survey of Canada – Pacific, Natural Resources Canada, PO Box 6000, Sidney British Columbia, Canada 3. Current Address: Office of the Chief Scientist, GPO Box 9839, Canberra, ACT 2601 Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism Minister for Resources and Energy: The Hon. Martin Ferguson, AM MP Secretary: Mr Drew Clarke Geoscience Australia Chief Executive Officer: Dr Chris Pigram © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) 2011 With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and where otherwise noted, all material in this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/) Geoscience Australia has tried to make the information in this product as accurate as possible. However, it does not guarantee that the information is totally accurate or complete. Therefore, you should not solely rely on this information when making a commercial decision. ISSN 1448-2177 ISBN 978-1-921954-51-1 GeoCat # 72805 Bibliographic reference: Przeslawski, R., Daniell, J., Anderson, T., Barrie, J.V., Heap, A., Hughes, M., Li, J., Potter, A., Radke, R., Siwabessy, J., Tran, M., Whiteway, T., Nichol, S.
    [Show full text]
  • From Observations to Impact – the First Decade of IMOS
    From Observations to Impact THE FIRST DECADE OF IMOS This document is dedicated to Dr Gary Meyers, the foundation IMOS Director, who led IMOS through its establishment phase from 2007 to 2009. Cover: Clive McMahon, Sydney Institute of Marine Science b | From Observations to Impact: the first decade of IMOS Anita Slotwinski, CSIRO 1 Anita Slotwinkski, CSIRO 2 | From Observations to Impact: the first decade of IMOS The Australian 2015 National The IMOS partners have established A note from Innovation and Science Agenda an observing system focused on the ten-year commitment to continue contemporary needs of an extensive the Chair funding research infrastructure user and stakeholder base by providing and the subsequent 2016 National high-performing research infrastructure Research Infrastructure Roadmap capability that is connected to research provides an opportunity to reflect on of relevance across various sectors the value of Australia’s Integrated of government, industry and society. Marine Observing System (IMOS) IMOS has provided a quantum leap nationally and internationally. in the availability of ocean data in Australia. Data used in the assessments Over the past 10 years IMOS has and models of ocean state and become an international leader in ocean health, from the Great Barrier Reef to observing building on the Oceans Antarctica leading to improvements Policy Science Advisory Group 2005 in understanding climate and weather vision for an Australian Integrated forecasting, industry practice and Ocean Observing System (AusIOOS). the
    [Show full text]
  • IMOS National Reference Station (NRS) Network
    IMOS National Reference Station (NRS) Network Rationale, Design and Implementation Plan August 2011 Prepared by: The NRS Scientific Steering Committee ( Lynch T.P., Morello E.B., Middleton J. F., Thompson, P., Feng, M., Richardson A., Doherty P., Roughan, M, Morris B., Tilbrook B., Steinberg C., James, C., and S. Allen ) and The IMOS Office (Moltmann T.C., Hill K.L. ) IMOS is supported by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy and the Super Science Initiative. It is led by the University of Tasmania on behalf of the Australian marine & climate science community. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Context .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Australia’s Coastal Oceans .................................................................................................... 4 1.3 History of coastal monitoring stations in Australia ............................................................. 6 2. Rationale ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3. Design and Implementation Plan .................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Location and Number of National Reference Stations .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cairns: Azooxanthellate Scleractinia of Australia 261
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2004 Records of the Australian Museum (2004) Vol. 56: 259–329. ISSN 0067-1975 The Azooxanthellate Scleractinia (Coelenterata: Anthozoa) of Australia STEPHEN D. CAIRNS Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, United States of America [email protected] ABSTRACT. A total of 237 species of azooxanthellate Scleractinia are reported for the Australian region, including seamounts off the eastern coast. Two new genera (Lissotrochus and Stolarskicyathus) and 15 new species are described: Crispatotrochus gregarius, Paracyathus darwinensis, Stephanocyathus imperialis, Trochocyathus wellsi, Conocyathus formosus, Dunocyathus wallaceae, Foveolocyathus parkeri, Idiotrochus alatus, Lissotrochus curvatus, Sphenotrochus cuneolus, Placotrochides cylindrica, P. minuta, Stolarskicyathus pocilliformis, Balanophyllia spongiosa, and Notophyllia hecki. Also, one new combination is proposed: Petrophyllia rediviva. Each species account includes an annotated synonymy for all Australian records as well as reference to extralimital accounts of significance, the type locality, and deposition of the type. Tabular keys are provided for the Australian species of Culicia and all species of Conocyathus and Placotrochides. A discussion of previous studies of Australian azooxanthellate corals is given in narrative and tabular form. This study was based on approximately 5500 previously unreported specimens collected from 500 localities, as
    [Show full text]
  • Update on the Effects of Covid-19 on the Delivery of Nautical Publications
    I [11/21] ADMIRALTY Charts affected by the Publication List ADMIRALTY Charts ADMIRALTY Charts International Charts 414 3186 INT 1353 442 3729 INT 1411 889 3766 INT 1508 921 8015 INT 1510 1178 8016 INT 1511 1503 8297 INT 1611 1504 AUS 109 INT 1700 1610 AUS 110 INT 1701 2025 AUS 118 INT 1702 2117 AUS 347 INT 1703 2350 AUS 722 INT 1704 2356 Q 6401 INT 1777 2449 Q 6402 2450 Q 6403 ADMIRALTY Publications 2451 Q 6404 2454 Q 6405 NP 30 2565 Q 6407 e-NP 30 2618 NP 131 2692 NP 282(1) 2942 NP 282(2) 3049 3051 UPDATE ON THE EFFECTS OF COVID-19 ON THE DELIVERY OF NAUTICAL PUBLICATIONS As a result of ongoing effects of COVID-19 on distribution infrastructure around the world, for safety reasons, we took the decision a few months ago to delay the publication of any non-essential ADMIRALTY Nautical Publications until further notice. We started to ease the restrictions on the dispatch of some of our paper publications for July 2020. We are continuing this effort and following some positive feedback on successful receipts of publications, we are now in a position to confirm the publications schedule for the rest of the year. As previously, we will continue to closely monitor our distribution network capacities. We reserve ourselves the right to amend this publications schedule accordingly should significant dispatch issues start arising again. denotes chart available in the ADMIRALTY Raster Chart Service series. 1.6 I ADMIRALTY CHARTS AND PUBLICATIONS NOW PUBLISHED AND AVAILABLE NEW EDITIONS OF ADMIRALTY CHARTS AND PUBLICATIONS New Editions of ADMIRALTY Charts published 18 March 2021 Chart Title, limits and other remarks Scale Folio 2021 Catalogue page 889 International Chart Series, Sweden - East Coast, Väddö to Öregrund.
    [Show full text]