MARKETING COMMUNICATION | JUNE 2020
Coronavirus relief: Economic recovery and the vindication of small caps
By: Doug Basile, Senior Portfolio Specialist Heritage Growth Equity team, WFAM
Over the past several months, the coronavirus pandemic Figure 1: 10 worst small-cap bear markets has weakened the global economy, wreaking havoc on Russell 2000 Index: Peak-to-trough decline markets around the globe. While most asset classes were 0 not impervious to the laconic drawdowns in the first quarter of 2020, small-cap stocks were hit particularly -10 hard. The Russell 2000® Index, composed of small-cap -20 stocks, set a record for the quickest descent into bear- -24 -2 market territory, taking only 12 trading sessions to drop -30 -2 -2 -2 -2 -34 20% from its February peak. -40 Percent -41 - 0 During its peak-to-trough decline from 19 February -4 - 1 - 4 through 18 March, the Russell 2000 Index fell 41% while - 0 the large-cap S&P 500 Index declined by 35% over roughly the same period. The RVX, a measure of the implied volatility of the Russell 2000 Index, surged to a multiyear high of 83%—its highest level since 2008.
Although the speed and amplitude of this recent sell-
Jan.1 1 3 Jan.
Jan. Jan. 1 2 June1 2
Dec. 1 July1 0
May1 0 1 0 Oct.
Aug.1 1 Oct.
Aug. 201 Dec.201
June1 1 Aug.
April 2011 Oct.2011
March 2002 Fe .2003 Fe . 2020 March2020 off were both alarming and elevated relative to history, Oct. 200 March200 bear markets are not rare. In fact, since 1962, small-cap Sources: Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) and investors have experienced a 20% correction roughly every Jefferies Group LLC 6 years, on average. Bear market defined as 20% or greater from previous peak Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
FOR PROFESSIONAL OR QUALIFIED INVESTOR USE ONLY 1 Small-cap stocks are typically regarded as more risky As the relative outperformance of large-cap stocks persists, relative to large-cap stocks. Their business models the invariable question is whether small-cap stocks are generally are more nascent and are often tied to a single destined to catch up. The answer is largely predicated on product or service, making them more susceptible to the positive changes to economic fundamentals. As key pillars economic cycle. Because their future cash flows can be of the economy recover, like unemployment and consumer more at risk if the economy falters, small-cap companies spending, a positive change in demand can enable small caps typically underperform their large-cap counterparts during to capture the economic improvement more rapidly than bear markets and recessionary periods. large caps.
Leverage and liquidity are key reasons this tends to be the This is partly due to the dexterity of small-cap business case. Small-cap stocks generally have higher leverage, lower models. They tend to be able to quickly align a sales profitability, and overall lower credit quality —factors that force or ramp up production to meet increased demand. become exposed as credit spreads widen amid periods of Also, marginal revenue improvements can have a larger market turmoil. As investors tilt their portfolios toward proportional impact on a small company’s financial companies with higher-quality balance sheets, small-cap statement than a larger company’s. Lastly, valuations are stocks often bear the brunt of having weaker balance sheets. very supportive: Small-cap stocks are trading at their lowest levels in 15 years relative to large caps. Lack of liquidity also exacerbates small-cap underperformance during risk-off periods. The same size Figure 3: Small-cap valuations attractive relative to variable that can serve as additional compensation in large caps the form of an illiquidity risk premium for the small-cap Relative price/earnings ratio last 12 months investor is often the same factor that investors lament during periods of stress. As selling pressure increases 1.30 during periods of risk aversion, smaller, less liquid stocks 1.20 experience more downside volatility due to trading frictions. 1.10 Figure 2: Small-cap leverage: Debt/EBITDA 1.00 Leverage has been consistently higher for small caps relative to large caps 0. 0 Net debt/EBITDA last 12 months to large-cap aluations 0. 0
Small-cap aluations relati e ast relati e aluation: 0. Russell 2000 Index (small caps) S P 00 Index (large caps) 0. 0 4. A erage relati e aluation (1.0 ) 4.0 3. 3.0
2. 31 2011 31 201
31 201 31 2013
30 2012
31 200 31 201 31 201 31 200 31 200
31 200 31 2014 30 201
31 200 30 2020
31 2010 2.0 1. 1.0 Sources: WFAM and FactSet 0. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. 0 The main factors that led to small caps’ relative underperformance during the downturn earlier this year may
be the same ones that could help bolster their performance
31 2020
31 12 2012 31 12 201 31 12 2013 31 12 200 30 12 201 31 12 2014 31 12 2010 31 12 200 31 12 201 31 12 201 30 12 2011 31 12 200 30 12 200 31 12 2004 31 12 2003 31 12 2001 31 12 200 31 12 201 31 12 1 31 12 2002 31 12 2000 as the economy improves and investors become more Sources: WFAM and FactSet comfortable with more leverage and less liquidity. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. EBITDA = Earnings before interest, taxtes, depreciation, Historically, we’ve seen significant recoveries within small- and amortization cap stocks when the economy rebounds. For instance, coming out of recessions, small caps have outperformed large caps in the past 9 out of 10 economic downturns. Moreover, in the six months following each of the past 10 bear markets, small caps have delivered a staggering 37% return, on average.
2 Figure 4: Small-cap bear market recoveries Small caps’ prolonged underperformance over the past Russell 2000 Index: Six-month recovery from bear markets several years could be partly because they’re more leveraged to the economic cycle and economic growth has 0 3 been tepid since the financial crisis. Factoring in the sharp 0 2 drawdown in February and March along with the market 0 strength in April and May, the underperformance of small 0 4 43 caps has become even more exacerbated this year. As of 40
Percent 3 33 May 31, 2020, the Russell 2000 Index had fallen nearly 30 2 20 16% compared with the S&P 500 Index, which had fallen 20 1 10 roughly 5%. 10 0 Nevertheless, even if we factor in 2020’s underperformance, the size premium for small caps has proven to be a worthy risk/reward proposition for investors who have the discipline to maintain a long-term time horizon.
March 2020
Figure 5: Hypothetical growth of $10,000 invested in
July 1 0 Jan. 1 1
Jan. 1 July 1
Fe . 2003 Aug. 2003
Aug. 1 Fe . 1
Oct. 1 0 April 1 1
Oct. 2011 April 2012
Oct. 1 April 1
Dec. 201 June 201 June 1 2 Dec. 1 2 small caps versus large caps
March 200 Sept. 200 Sources: WFAM and Jefferies Group LLC 1,000,000,000 2 , ,2 3 Bear market defined as 20% or greater from previous peak Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. 100,000,000