DOCSLIB.ORG

SEE MORRIS of NY GENEALOGY PART II (1700-64) (2D Lord of Manor of Morrisania, 1746-62) for the OFFSPRING (NJ Chief Justice, 1738-64) (Governor of Pennsylvania,= Col

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEE MORRIS of NY GENEALOGY PART II (1700-64) (2D Lord of Manor of Morrisania, 1746-62) for the OFFSPRING (NJ Chief Justice, 1738-64) (Governor of Pennsylvania,= Col Copyright by CLP Research William? Morris (1575-1620) Partial Genealogy of the Morrises, Part I = Lucy Walters Main Political Affiliation: (of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, & Michigan) (1579-at least 1618) 1763-83 Whig/Revolutionary 1789-1823 Federalist 1824-31 National Republican 1600 Colonel Lewis Morris 3 Others Cpt. Richard Morris Thomas Morris (1601-91) (1616-1673) (1618-90) 1832-53 Whig (Barbados sugar planter by 1638); (moved to New York, 1650s) (Soldier of Oliver Cromwell's Army in England, 1650s) (Emigrated from Tintern, 1982- Republican (New Jersey iron smelter; Bronx real estate) (Emigrated from Tintern, Monmouthshire, Wales to New York, 1668?) Monmouthshire, Wales (Wills estate to nephew Lewis) to Barbados) = Mary Barton = Sarah Pole (1618?-1690) (1649-72) SEE MORRIS OF OH 1 Daughter Lewis Morris I GENEALOGY PART I (1671-1746) & (1st Lord of Manor of Morrisania MORRIS OF IL 1650 now part of Bronx in NYC, 1697-1746) GENEALOGY (NY gov council, 1702); (NY & NJ chief justice, 1710-38) (Governor of New Jersey, 1738-46) = Isabella Graham (1673-1752) 9 Others Lewis Morris II of NY Robert Hunter Morris Elizabeth Morris (1712-84) (1698-1762) SEE MORRIS OF NY GENEALOGY PART II (1700-64) (2d Lord of Manor of Morrisania, 1746-62) FOR THE OFFSPRING (NJ chief justice, 1738-64) = Col. Anthony White I Katrintje Staats = OF LEWIS MORRIS I (Governor of Pennsylvania, = Sarah Gouverneur (1717-87) 1700 (1697-1730) & SARAH GOUVERNEUR (1714-86) 1754-56) (Emigrated to New Jersey) SEE MORRIS OF NY (NJ gov't official) GENEALOGY See White of NJ Lewis Morris III 1 Other Staats Long Morris Richard Morris PART II Genealogy (1726-98) (1728-1800) (1730-1810) (3rdd Lord of Manor of Morrisania, (Loyalist General) (NY supreme court chief justice, 1779-90) 1762-98); (NY asembly, 1769-74) = Catherine Gordon See Ludlow of NY = Sarah Ludlow (US Continental Congress, 1775-77; Dowager Duchess of Gordon Genealogy (1730-91) (Signer Declaration of Independence) (1718-1779) 1750 = Mary Walton (1727-94) Lewis Morris IV 7 Others Gen. Jacob Morris Magdelena Helena James Morris Gen. Lewis Richard Morris 2 Daughters Robert Morris (1752-1824) (1755-1844); (US General) Morris (1764-1827) (1760-1825) (1762-1851) = Anne B. Elliott (1762-1840) = Helena Van (US House, 1797-1803) = Frances Ludlum (NY house, 1792, 1795-96); (NY senate, 1798-1800) See Van Cortlandt (1762-1848) = John Rutherfurd Cortlandt Theoda = Mary = Ellen Hunt (1766-1852) of NY (1768-1812) Mary Cox = = Sophia (1760-1840); (Fed) Genealogy Olcott= Dwight (1781-1865) (1759-1827) Pringle (moved to New Jersey) (1765-1800) (1763-1814) (1798-1865) (built Edgerston farm) (NJ house, 1788-89) 7 Others George Washington 10 Others Sarah Sabina Catherine Cox 1 Son (US Senate, 1791-96) 11 Others William Henry Morris 2 Children 1 Daughter 5 ChildrenMary Morris 8 Others Morris Morris Morris (pres Board of Proprietors (1810-96) (1790-1869) 1800 of East Jersey, 1804-40) Hannah Cornell (1799-1834 (1788-1878) (1795-1818) (NY commission for Newbold = = Ella Brickhead = James Alexander Hamilton = Maria Evens Whaley = Peter Philip = Col. John Holmes Prentiss NYC expansion, 1807-11) (1816-42) (1830-81) (1788-1878) (1812-69) James Kean (1784-1861); (Dem) (NJ commission for (Dem then Whig/Rep) (1788-1828) (born Worcester MA) Delaware & Raritan (publisher of NY American) (moved to New York, 1808) canal, 1816; 2 Sons Augustus 2 Children (US Dist Att southern NY, 1829-34) See Kean of NJ (founder/editor, Freeman's Journal) for NJ-NY-PA boundary, Newbold Morris (supporter of National Bank) 4 Others Josephine Matilda Morris Genealogy (US Postmaster of Cooperstown, 1826-33) (1838-1906) (1831-92) See Hamilton of NY Otsego co. NY, 1832-37) See Rutherfurd of NJ = Eleanor Coilford Jones (1841-1906) Genealogy = Col. Peter Augustus Porter II (US House from NY, 1837-41) Genealogy (daughter of Gen. James Jones) (1827-64) (president, Bank of Cooperstown) Part I 1850 (NY leg, 1862) (Killed at Cold Harbor) See Prentiss of NY 4 Others Newbold Morris Genealogy (1868-at least 1910) See Porter of NY = Helen S. Kingsland Genealogy (1876-at least 1910) 1 Son George L.K. Morris (1905-75); (abstract painter) 1900 See Frelinghuysen of NJ = Estelle Condit "Suzy" Frelinhuysen Genealogy (1911-88); (opera singer); (painter).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pennsylvania Assembly's Conflict with the Penns, 1754-1768
    Liberty University “The Jaws of Proprietary Slavery”: The Pennsylvania Assembly’s Conflict With the Penns, 1754-1768 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the History Department in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts in History by Steven Deyerle Lynchburg, Virginia March, 2013 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: Liberty or Security: Outbreak of Conflict Between the Assembly and Proprietors ......9 Chapter 2: Bribes, Repeals, and Riots: Steps Toward a Petition for Royal Government ..............33 Chapter 3: Securing Privilege: The Debates and Election of 1764 ...............................................63 Chapter 4: The Greater Threat: Proprietors or Parliament? ...........................................................90 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................113 1 Introduction In late 1755, the vituperative Reverend William Smith reported to his proprietor Thomas Penn that there was “a most wicked Scheme on Foot to run things into Destruction and involve you in the ruins.” 1 The culprits were the members of the colony’s unicameral legislative body, the Pennsylvania Assembly (also called the House of Representatives). The representatives held a different opinion of the conflict, believing that the proprietors were the ones scheming, in order to “erect their desired Superstructure of despotic Power, and reduce to
    [Show full text]
  • Now Have Taken up the Hatchet Against Them”: Braddock’S Defeat and the Martial Liberation of the Western Delawares
    We “Now Have Taken up the Hatchet against Them”: Braddock’s Defeat and the Martial Liberation of the Western Delawares N 1755 WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA became the setting for a series of transforming events that resonated throughout the colonial world of INorth America. On July 9, on the banks of the Monongahela River— seven miles from the French stronghold of Fort Duquesne—two regi- ments of the British army, together with over five companies of colonial militia, suffered a historic mauling at the hands of a smaller force of French marines, Canadian militia, and Great Lakes Indians. With nearly one thousand casualties, the defeat of General Edward Braddock’s com- mand signified the breakdown of British presence on the northern Appalachian frontier. This rout of British-American forces also had an immense effect on the future of Indians in the Ohio Country, particularly the peoples of western Pennsylvania referred to as the Delawares. I would like to thank the anonymous readers and my teachers and trusted colleagues, Dr. Holly Mayer of Duquesne University and Dr. Mary Lou Lustig, emeritus West Virginia University, for their constructive criticisms and helpful suggestions as I worked through the revision process for this article. THE PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Vol. CXXXVII, No. 3 ( July 2013) 228 RICHARD S. GRIMES July From late October 1755 through the spring of 1756, Delaware war parties departing from their principal western Pennsylvania town of Kittanning and from the east in the Susquehanna region converged on the American backcountry. There they inflicted tremendous loss of life and cataclysmic destruction of property on the settlements of Pennsylvania and Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2015 Robert Daiutolo, Jr. All RIGHTS RESERVED
    © 2015 Robert Daiutolo, Jr. All RIGHTS RESERVED GEORGE CROGHAN: THE LIFE OF A CONQUEROR by ROBERT DAIUTOLO, JR. A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School—New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of Jan Lewis and approved by _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION George Croghan: The Life of a Conqueror By ROBERT DAIUTOLO, JR. Dissertation Director: Jan Lewis This dissertation integrates my own specifying paradigm of “situational frontier” and his- torian David Day’s generalizing paradigm of “supplanting society” to contextualize one historical personage, George Croghan, who advanced the interests of four eighteenth-cen- tury supplanting societies—one nation (Great Britain) and three of its North American colonies (Pennsylvania, New York, and Virginia)—in terms of three fields of endeavor, trade, diplomacy, and proprietorship. Croghan was an Irish immigrant who, during his working life on the “situational frontiers” of North America, mastered the intricacies of intercultural trade and diplomacy. His mastery of both fields of endeavor enabled him not only to create advantageous conditions for the governments of the three colonies to claim proprietorship of swaths of Indian land, but also to create advantageous conditions for himself to do likewise. The loci of his and the three colonies’ claims were the “situa- tional frontiers” themselves, the distinct spaces where particular Indians, Europeans, and Euro-Americans converged in particular circumstances and coexisted, sometimes peace- fully and sometimes violently. His mastery of intercultural trade and diplomacy enabled him as well to create advantageous conditions for Great Britain to claim proprietorship in the Old Northwest (present-day Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Illinois) and for himself to do likewise.
    [Show full text]
  • WILLIAM MORRIS MEREDITH 1799-1873 by RICHARD LEWIS ASHIHURST, O She Peinsylvania Bar
    THE AMERICAN LAW REGISTER FOUNDED 18S2 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LAW VOL. {6 N.S.} APRIL, 1907 No. 4. WILLIAM MORRIS MEREDITH 1799-1873 by RICHARD LEWIS ASHIHURST, O she Peinsylvania Bar. William Morris Meredith was a conspicuous figure in Pennsylvania during the middle fifty years of the 19th Century, and played a highly important part in its his- tory. It may further be truthfully said that during that time he exercised at certain critical periods a powerful influence and left a distinct impress on the life of the Nation. Whether owing to the proverbial evanescent nature of the triumphs of the forum, or to the reserve, to call it by no stronger name, so often shown by his State and City in their appreciation of their greatest citizens, there are probably few so great Americans so little remembered outside of Pennsylvania. Born at the beginning of the Century his earnest professional activity covered a pe- riod of more than half a century ending only with his Copyright. zgo7. by 3. B.Liscorr CouItAN. All righu reserved. it 201 WILLIAM MORRIS MEREDITH. death in 1873, and during the longer portion of this period he was the recognized leader of the Bar of Penn- sylvania, and besides the prominent State and City posi- tions he filled, he had been as Secretary of the Trea- sury under Taylor the controlling spirit of the last truly Whig administration of the Federal Government. William Morris Meredith was born June 8, 1799, in the home of his father, William Meredith, in Philadelphia. Law had already taken a strong hold on the Meredith family.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Hunter Morris and the Politics of Indian Affairs in Pennsylvania, 1754-1755
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1995 Robert Hunter Morris and the Politics of Indian Affairs in Pennsylvania, 1754-1755 Charles Michael Downing College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Downing, Charles Michael, "Robert Hunter Morris and the Politics of Indian Affairs in Pennsylvania, 1754-1755" (1995). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626005. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-y2wn-7396 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROBERT HUNTER MORRIS AND THE POLITICS OF INDIAN AFFAIRS IN PENNSYLVANIA, 1754-1755 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Charles Michael Downing 1995 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, August 1995 A xm JUL James Axtell bhn E. Si James P. Whittenbui TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin and the Pennsylvania Germans John B
    Franklin and the Pennsylvania Germans John B. Frantz The Pennsylvania State University INTRODUCTION Although the Germans began to arrive in Pennsylvania forty years before Benjamin Franklin left Boston for Philadelphia in 1723, both began to attract attention in that decade. Franklin gained fame as an innovative writer and expert printer, which made him wealthy enough to withdraw from business by the late 1740s.' The Pennsylvania Germans became obvious because of the non-Britishness of the multitudes of them who were leaving behind the wars of Europe for William Penn's comparatively peaceful "Holy Experiment." By the middle decades of the century, estimates placed their numbers between 60,000 and 100,000, constituting one-third to three-fifths of the colony's nearly 200,000 to 300,000 inhabitants.2 Most of the early arrivals belonged to the pacifistic religious groups. Almost all of the later ones were Lutheran and Reformed, with a few Roman Catholics, who had no qualms about fighting "a just war," though almost all initially supported the peace-loving English Quakers politically.' Franklin's Early Contacts with the Pennsylvania Germans Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Germans early came in contact with each other. Franklin heard and conversed with the German Seventh Day Baptist evangelist Michael Welfare when he preached in Philadelphia in 1734. After Franklin began his own printing establishment, he published material for German settlers. As early as 1731, he printed in German two books for the German Baptists.4 He printed in pamphlet form a letter from Pennsylvania's negotiator with the Indians Conrad Weiser to the German-language publisher Christopher Sauer.5 In 1740, he brought out a German translation of Gilbert Tennent's sermon "The Danger of an Unconverted Ministry." Between 1742 and 1744, he published in German a Moravian catechism and the Authentische Relation (Authentic Relation) of the Moravians' conferences of 1742 at which they tried to unite Pennsylvania's numerous religious groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Provincial Soldiers in the Seven Years' War
    196 Pennsylvania History Pennsylvania Provincial Soldiers in the Seven Years' War. R.S. Stephenson University of Virginia In the late 1820s, as he composed a narrative of his life in the Continental Army during the American Revolution, an aged Joseph Plumb Martin recalled the peculiar habits, dialects and appearance that distinguished soldiers and civilians from New England and the "middle states." Martin, a Yankee himself, thought Pennsylvanians and Yankees "two sets of people as opposite in manners and customs as light and darkness." On one memorable day near New York in 1780, Martin recalled the sight of a baggage column belonging to several corps from the middle region. The scene, he recalled, "beggared all description...a caravan of wild beasts could bear no comparison." The men, women and children that straggled by on foot and horseback bore peculiar visages: there were "some with two eyes, some with one, and some I believe with none at all." Their clothing was a melange: "some in rags and some in jags but none in velvet gowns." Above all, their peculiar accents bespoke their far-flung origins: "There was Irish and Scotch brogue, murdered English, flat insipid Dutch, and some lingoes which would puzzle a philosopher to tell whether they belonged to this world or some undiscovered country."' Martin's encounters with fellow Americans who seemed utterly unlike himself paralleled the meetings of earlier generations of Yankee soldiers with equally strange fellow Britons during nearly a century of intermittent colonial warfare. In recent years, historians have closely examined the interplay of war and New England soci- ety during the colonial and revolutionary eras, offering rich insights into how gener- ations of Martin's countrymen conceived of war, organized for defense, interacted with Indians, soldiers and sailors from across the Atlantic World, and through these experiences strengthened their conception of themselves as a unique and chosen peo- ple.
    [Show full text]
  • When We Were Young: the American Philosophical Society in the 18Th Century1
    When We Were Young: The American Philosophical Society in the 18th Century1 GARY B. NASH Distinguished Research Professor University of California, Los Angeles n 2018 the American Philosophical Society celebrated its 275th anniversary, though in truth, 1743 is a shadowy date. Some think Ithe APS began in 1727, when Benjamin Franklin, at age 21—having resided in Philadelphia for less than two years since he first arrived in late 1723—convened his famous Junto of leather apron men (Figure 1). Drawing up rules for this private self-improvement group, 12 in number and limited to that size, he tasked “every Member in his Turn” to produce “one or more Queries . to be discuss’d by the Company.’’2 Among the founding group, four were from Samuel Keimer’s print shop (Franklin, Hugh Meredith, Stephen Potts, and George Webb) while the others were shoemakers (John Jones and William Parsons); a surveyor (Nicholas Scull); a scrivener (Joseph Breitnall); a carpenter (William Coleman); an ironmaker (Robert Grace); a glass maker (Thomas Godfrey); and a cabinet maker (William Mangrudge). It was a noble start, indeed an astounding venture, ushered into the world by such a youth striving to implant himself in a young river port, where Quaker merchants and landowners of growing wealth held sway.3 The APS website today claims our Society as an “offshoot” of 1 Read 26 April 2018. My thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions for this paper. 2 The editors of the comprehensive edition of the Papers of Benjamin Franklin aver that Franklin had been influenced by Boston’s venerable Cotton Mather’s Essays to Do Good (1710), which proposed voluntary groups to encourage morality and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Documents
    NOTES AND DOCUMENTS *An ^American in J^ondony 1735—1736 II EDITED BY BEVERLY MCANEAR Saturdayy July 26} 1735. I rosse Early and wrote till 2, when I dined. My father read the persian letters.84 After dinner one Kerr85 came to wait on my father with letters from Capt. Pearse, with whom He came from Virginia. Captn. Pearse was stoped at Portsmouth] by Adll. Cavindish86 and Had Sent my fathers letters and papers up by Ker. He left New York the 22 of June, and all the family well. We read over our letters and the papers that came with them. I dress'd and went to Capt. Tubly, who was walking on the Bishops Walk. I told Him of the arrivall of Capt. Pearse, with whom Young Grey is, who the Capt. designs for his daughter. I walked with Him till past 7 oClock, when we went to the Club. Comissary Cullif ord being there, we Had some discourse about the Cheapness of arms made at Brum- idgham, where, the Comissary told us, he was offerred Cutlases to all appearance as good as those used in the queens ware at sea for two Shillings a piece and guns for 7 pound a score, but the guns he believed to be good for little. I stayed till Capt. Man and Doctor Smart came, when, taking my lieve, I walked some time with Miss Balcion and, coming Home, went to bed. Sundayy July 27y 1735.1 rosse Early and, Having read in the per- sian letters till 11,1 dress'd, as did my father.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    The Declaration of Independence: About the Signers (Continued) The Signers of the Declaration of Independence All of the colonies were represented in Philadelphia to consider the delicate case for independence and to change the course of the war. In all, there were fifty-six representatives from the thirteen colonies. Fourteen represented the New England Colonies, twenty-one represented the Middle Colonies and twenty-one represented the South- ern Colonies. The largest number (9) came from Pennsylvania. Most of the signers were American born although eight were foreign born. The ages of the signers ranged from 26 (Edward Rutledge) to 70 (Benjamin Franklin), but the majority of the signers were in their thirties or forties. More than half of the signers were lawyers and the others were planters, merchants and shippers. Together they mutually pledged “to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” They were mostly men of means who had much to lose if the war was lost. None of the sign- ers died at the hands of the British, and one-third served as militia officers during the war. Four of the signers were taken captive during the war and nearly all of them were poorer at the end of the war than at the beginning. No matter what each of these men did after July 1776, the actual signing of the Declaration of Independence which began on August 2 ensured them instant immortality. The following gives a bit of information about each signer AFTER the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Connecticut Samuel Huntington (1731-1796)—Samuel Huntington was a self-made man who distinguished himself in government on the state and national levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Gouverneur Morris (1752–1816)
    02 2014 Center for the Study of the American Constitution N O. 6: GOUVERNEUR MORRIS (1752–1816) child of privilege, Gouverneur Morris was born on the Hudson River Valley manor of Mor- risania in New York. Morris was a 1768 graduate of King’s College (Columbia), and he was A admitted to the New York bar in 1771. Morris was a Westchester member in the New York provincial congresses, 1775–77, and along with John Jay and Robert R. Livingston was an author of the new state constitution in 1777. Morris successfully advocated for a provision guaranteeing freedom of religion, but he was unsuccessful in obtaining the elimination of slavery. Morris was a member of the first Committee of Safety, New York’s executive authority before the new state constitution came into force. While serving as a delegate to Congress, 1778–79, Morris signed the Articles of Confederation, chaired several committees, and wrote important public papers. When the state legislature refused to re-appoint him in 1779, Morris moved to Pennsylvania where he allied with the state Republican Party, which strongly opposed the radically democratic state constitution. In May 1780, Morris’s left leg was shattered in a carriage accident. The accident ultimately led to the leg’s amputation below the knee. Colleagues and critics alike hoped that the loss of a leg would slow down Morris’s escapades and curtail his indiscretions, but the injury had seemingly little impact. Morris served as the assistant superintendent of finance to Robert Morris under the Articles of Con- federation, 1781–85. (The Morrises were not related.) In the Constitutional Convention, Morris deliv- ered more speeches than any other delegate, and he was a member of the Committee of Style, where he shaped the final language of the Constitution.
    [Show full text]