Three Crises and Their Potential Impact on the Legal Profession
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Congressional Record—Senate S1184
S1184 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE February 27, 2020 bomb components, repair and return of weap- get. Laser designation for the LGB can be ests above the interests of the United States. ons, weapons training equipment, practice provided by a variety of laser target markers The House Impeachment Managers have bombs, TTU–595 Test Set and spares, fin as- or designators. proven that the President’s abuse of power semblies, rocket motors, training aids/de- 4. Mk–82 General Purpose (GP) bomb is a and congressional obstruction amount to the vices/spare parts, aircraft spare parts, sup- 500 pound, free-fall, unguided, low-drag weap- constitutional standard of ‘‘high Crimes and port equipment, clothing and textiles, publi- on usually equipped with the mechanical Misdemeanors’’ for which the sole remedy is cations and technical documentation, travel M904 (nose) and M905 (tail) fuzes or the conviction and removal from office. expenses, medical services, construction, air- radar-proximity FMU–113 air-burst fuze. The II. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS craft ferry support, technical and logistical Mk–82 is designed for soft, fragment sen- On December 18, 2019, the United States support services, major modifications/class sitive targets and is not intended for hard House of Representatives passed H. Res. 755,1 IV support, personnel training and training targets or penetrations. The explosive filling ‘‘Impeaching Donald John Trump, President equipment, U.S. Government and contractor is usually tritonal, though other composi- of the United States, for high crimes and program support, and other related elements tions have sometimes been used. misdemeanors.’’ H. Res. 755 contains two Ar- of logistics and program support. -
Impeachment, Donald Trump and the Attempted Extortion of Ukraine
Pace Law Review Volume 40 Issue 2 Article 4 July 2020 IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP AND THE ATTEMPTED EXTORTION OF UKRAINE Lawrence J. Trautman [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lawrence J. Trautman, IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP AND THE ATTEMPTED EXTORTION OF UKRAINE, 40 Pace L. Rev. 141 (2020) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol40/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP AND THE ATTEMPTED EXTORTION OF UKRAINE Lawrence J. Trautman1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 143 II. THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION FOR IMPEACHMENT ....................................................................... 144 A. Treason ......................................................................... 145 B. Bribery .......................................................................... 145 C. Other High Crimes and Misdemeanors ..................... 145 D. Impeachment Is An Emergency Measure .................. 146 III. HISTORY OF U.S. PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS ........................................................................ 148 A. President Andrew Johnson ......................................... 149 -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2020 No. 12 Senate The Senate met at 12:30 p.m. and was Framers of our Constitution knew that crats had received when they were in called to order by the President pro the Senate—and only the Senate— the minority back in 1998. Here in the tempore (Mr. GRASSLEY). could handle. Our Founders trusted the Senate, every single Senator will have f Senate to rise above short-term pas- exactly the same rights and exactly sions and factionalism. They trusted the same ability to ask questions. PRAYER the Senate to soberly consider what The House broke with fairness by The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- has actually been proven and which cutting President Trump’s counsel out fered the following prayer: outcome best serves the Nation. That of their inquiry to an unprecedented Let us pray. is a pretty high bar, and you might say degree. Here in the Senate, the Presi- Eternal God, You are our rock and that later today, this body will take dent’s lawyers will finally receive a fortress. Keep us from dishonor. Only our entrance exam. level playing field with the House by walking in Your precepts can our Today, we will consider and pass an Democrats and will finally be able to lawmakers remain within the circle of organizing resolution that will struc- present the President’s case. Finally, Your protection and blessings. -
Trench Warfare
mike davis TRENCH WARFARE Notes on the 2020 Election e assume that times of great social upheaval and human peril produce equally dramatic political reactions: uprisings, counter-revolutions, new deals and civil wars. The one and only thing that most Americans agree about Wis that we are living in such a time, the greatest national crisis since 1932 or even 1860. Against a background of plague, impeachment, racist vio- lence and unemployment, one party espouses a vision of autocratized government and a return to the happy days of a white Republic. The other offers a sentimental journey back to the multicultural centrism of the Obama years. (Biden’s promise of a ‘new new deal’ was for gullible progressives’ ears only.) Both parties are backward looking, solipsistic and unanchored in economic reality, but the first echoes the darkest side of modern history. The vote, held on a day when more than 100,000 Americans tested positive for covid-19, was supposed to deliver a definitive verdict on Donald Trump. Indeed the President’s increasingly frenetic attempts to delegitimize the election seemed to signal his appre- hension of a Democratic landslide. In the event a projected 160 million ballots were mailed in or cast in person, representing the highest turn- out rate in 120 years. A stunning judgement was expected. Instead the election results are a virtual photocopy of 2016: all the disas- ters of the last four years appear to have barely moved the needle. Biden eked out a slim victory, in some states only by microscopic margins, that won him 306 electoral votes, the same as Trump four years ago. -
Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: the Impact on U.S
Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs U.S. Senate Committee on Finance Majority Staff Report TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IV. THE VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE AND STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS WERE AWARE OF BUT IGNORED CONCERNS RELATING TO HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD. V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMED HE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD. VI. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS VIEWED MYKOLA ZLOCHEVSKY AS A CORRUPT, “ODIOUS OLIGARCH,” BUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN WAS ADVISED NOT TO ACCUSE ZLOCHEVSKY OF CORRUPTION. VII. WHILE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON BURISMA’S BOARD, BURISMA’S OWNER, ZLOCHEVSKY, ALLEGEDLY PAID A $7 MILLION BRIBE TO UKRAINE’S PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE TO CLOSE THE CASE. VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON BURISMA’S BOARD. IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND A DEMOCRAT LOBBYING FIRM HAD CONSISTENT AND SIGNIFICANT CONTACT WITH FORMER UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL ANDRII TELIZHENKO. X. THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION. XI. HUNTER BIDEN’S AND HIS FAMILY’S FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH UKRAINIAN, RUSSIAN, KAZAKH AND CHINESE NATIONALS RAISE CRIMINAL CONCERNS AND EXTORTION THREATS. XII. CONCLUSION 2 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In late 2013 and into 2014, mass protests erupted in Kyiv, Ukraine, demanding integration into western economies and an end to systemic corruption that had plagued the country. At least 82 people were killed during the protests, which culminated on Feb. -
A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding US Government
Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2020 Ground to a Halt: A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding U.S. Government Shutdowns Ian R. Baum Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the American Politics Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Baum, Ian R., "Ground to a Halt: A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding U.S. Government Shutdowns" (2020). Honors Theses. Paper 973. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/973 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Baum 1 Ground to a Halt: A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding U.S. Government Shutdowns Ian Baum Senior Honors Thesis Department of Government, Colby College First Reader: Sandy Maisel Second Reader: Nick Jacobs 17 April 2020 Abstract Government shutdowns are a relatively frequent, yet understudied, phenomenon in American politics. To better understand these shutdowns, I present them as competitions between parties in two areas: First, the policy space, in which each party tries to end a shutdown with a policy that coincides with that party’s ideology and; second, the public opinion space, in which each party attempts to win support from the public. I use both qualitative (case studies), and quantitative (formal and statistical models) methods to evaluate shutdowns using this lens. -
Foreword: the Degradation of American Democracy—And the Court
VOLUME 134 NOVEMBER 2020 NUMBER 1 © 2020 by The Harvard Law Review Association THE SUPREME COURT 2019 TERM FOREWORD: THE DEGRADATION OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY — AND THE COURT† Michael J. Klarman CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 I. THE DEGRADATION OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ............................................................ 11 A. The Authoritarian Playbook ............................................................................................. 11 B. President Trump’s Authoritarian Bent ............................................................................ 19 1. Attacks on Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Speech .......................................... 20 2. Attacks on an Independent Judiciary .......................................................................... 22 3. Politicizing Law Enforcement ...................................................................................... 23 4. Politicizing the Rest of the Government ...................................................................... 25 5. Using Government Office for Private Gain .................................................................. 28 6. Encouraging Violence .................................................................................................... 32 7. Racism ............................................................................................................................. 33 8. Lies .................................................................................................................................. -
A Case for the American People Notes
A Case for the American People Notes Opening Statement 6 He will not change: As Adam Schiff said on February 3, 2020, “he will not change”: Adam Schiff, U.S Congress, Senate, Trial of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, 116th Cong., 2nd sess., Congressional Record, (February 3, 2020): S788, https://www.congress.gov/116/crec/2020/01/23/CREC-2020-01-23-pt1-PgS513.pdf. Chapter 1: The Illegal President 10 partnered with my Republican ethics counterpart: For additional details on my work with Painter and other ethics experts, see “Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel,” Project on Government Oversight (POGO), January 24, 2017, https://www.pogo.org/letter/2017/01/ethics-commitments-by-executive-branch-personnel-draft. 12 package of ethics proposals: Norman Eisen and Peter Schweizer, “The Swamp Is Deep, and Here Are Five Bipartisan Ways to Drain It,” Washington Post, December 13, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-swamp-is-deep-and-here-are-five-bipartisan- ways-to-drain-it/2016/12/13/720a747a-c096-11e6-897f-918837dae0ae_story.html. 13 Trump’s first press conference: “President-Elect Donald Trump News Conference,” C- SPAN, January 11, 2019, https://www.c-span.org/video/?421482-1/president-elect-donald-trump- election-year-hacking-i-russia. 17 Shaub’s denunciation: Eric Lipton and Nicholas Fandos, “Departing Ethics Chief: U.S. Is ‘Close to a Laughingstock,” New York Times, July 17, 2017, 1 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/us/politics/walter-shaub-ethics.html; “Remarks of Walter M. Shaub, Jr., Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics, as Prepared for Delivery at 4:00 p.m. -
Conspiracy Against the United States the Story of Trump and Russia
GETTY KLIMENTYEV IMAGES/MIKHAIL Conspiracy Against the United States The Story of Trump and Russia By Max Bergmann, Jeremy Venook, and the Moscow Project Team November 2018 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESSACTION.ORG Conspiracy Against the United States The Story of Trump and Russia By Max Bergmann, Jeremy Venook, and the Moscow Project Team November 2018 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 An adversary returns 11 Bailed out by Russia 22 Cultivating an asset 28 The election 44 Putin’s payoff 56 The investigation 71 Recommendations 82 Conclusion 83 About the authors 84 Endnotes Introduction and summary On January 6, 2017, the United States intelligence community released its unclas- sified, official assessment of Russia’s unprecedented and unprovoked attack on the 2016 U.S. presidential election. In the report, all 17 intelligence agencies unani- mously assessed that Russian President Vladimir Putin had personally “ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election” with the specific aim of electing Donald Trump. The assessment in effect concluded that there were two campaigns to elect Trump—one operating out of Trump Tower and the other out of the Kremlin.1 Since then, the Russia investigation has revealed a sprawling scandal: Members of Trump’s campaign, including those in the president’s inner circle, were in constant contact with representatives of the Russian government throughout the election and transition. The two campaigns discussed tactics and policy, including the release of “dirt” on their mutual opponent, Hillary Clinton, and rolling back American sanc- tions against Russia. And they executed their strategies timed to maximally benefit Trump’s chances of victory. -
Did President Trump's 2020 Election Litigation Kill Rule
DID PRESIDENT TRUMP’S 2020 ELECTION LITIGATION KILL RULE 11? BRENDAN WILLIAMS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 182 I.AN ATTORNEY’S DUTY TO AVOID FRIVOLOUS LITIGATION ....................... 187 II.THE LEGAL ATTACK ON DEMOCRACY ...................................................... 189 A. Arizona ..................................................................................... 189 B. Georgia .................................................................................... 191 C. Michigan .................................................................................. 193 D. Pennsylvania ............................................................................ 193 E. Wisconsin ................................................................................. 196 F. U.S. Supreme Court .................................................................. 197 III.A MOCKERY OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM ...................................................... 198 IV.CONGRESS AND THE INSURRECTION ....................................................... 206 CONCLUSION: IS RULE 11 DEAD? ................................................................ 212 Attorney Brendan Williams is a prolific writer on civil rights and health care issues when not busy running a New Hampshire health care association. This article is dedicated to Brendan’s Iowa City High School journalism teacher, Jack Kennedy, who encouraged his writing at a time when life could have taken him in the wrong direction.