1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTA TION PROCESS Spioenkop Nature Reserve is situated off the Provincial Road R600, 27kms south-west of Ladysmith, 11kms north of Winterton and 6kms north-east of Bergville as the crow flies. The reserve consists of the state owned Spioenkop Dam, situated at its centre, and surrounded, predominantly, by vegetation types such as the KwaZulu-Natal Highland Thornveld covering approximately 97% of the Reserve, as well as a small portion of the Northern KwaZulu-Natal Shrubland in the north-east of the reserve which covers about 3% of the Reserve.

The Spioenkop Dam is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA). The dam divides SNR into two sections, the South-Shore Section (2 304 ha) south of the dam and North-Shore Section (1 666 ha) north of the dam.

The original Spioenkop Dam, which is located at the centre of the Reserve, was developed in the late 60s with the aim of tapping into the hitherto relatively unutilized water resources of the Upper uThukela River for the promotion of industrial expansion in the Ladysmith-Colenso-Bergville area as well as for irrigation expansion along the uThukela River itself, including the Bloukrantz River Valley. It was also to supply supplementary water to the Vaal River basin for urban and industrial use.

The reserve is a key component of the protected area system in the region of KwaZulu-Natal. The protected area is situated east of the northern section of the uKhahlamba Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site and to the North West of Wagon Drift Dam Nature Reserve and Weenen Nature Reserve (Map A – Location of Spioenkop Nature Reserve); within the Uthukela District Municipality and the oKhahlamba Local Municipality.

Spioenkop was proclaimed initially in 1975 as the Spioenkop Public Resort Nature Reserve; in 1988 additional farms were consolidated and proclaimed as part of the Spioenkop Public Resort Nature Reserve with a total size of 7283 ha. The reserve is no longer known by the full proclaimed name but as Spioenkop Nature Reserve.

The famous historic battlefield site of Spioenkop hill can be accessed on foot from the reserve or by road outside of the reserve, this site offers stunning views of the Drakensberg Mountains and foothills.

Spioenkop Nature Reserve is a registered Important Bird Area (IBA, SA 062) with Cape Vulture (Gyps coprotheros), the rare Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus) and occasionally the Lappet faced Vulture (Torgos traceliotus) utilising the vulture restaurant in the reserve. The reserve protects important vegetation types including KwaZulu-Natal Highveld Thornveld with a small portion of the vulnerable Temperate Alluvial Vegetation present in the north east of the reserve. Small portions of the vulnerable vegetation type, Northern KwaZulu-Natal Moist Grassland are present in the western and north western parts of the reserve. Important animal species such as White Rhino (Ceratotherium simum) is also represented in the reserve.

The National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act (No.57 of 2003) requires that Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife compile and implement Protected Area Management Plans in all of the protected areas under its jurisdiction. In preparing these plans it is important that participatory processes, involving local communities and other stakeholders are implemented in an effort to ensure that all key issues are considered and incorporated into the management plan.

This public participation report provides the background to the process followed in developing the management plan for Spioenkop Nature Reserve. It reflects the inputs and involvement of stakeholders in developing the plan and provides a summary of the key issues that have emerged

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 2

from this process. This document will form a supporting document to the management plan, providing some of the details and context of how the plan was formulated.

1.1 The context of stakeholder consultation

In terms of Section 39(3) of the Protected Areas Act, consultation is required with municipalities, other organs of state, local communities and other affected parties, which have an interest in the area, when compiling a management plan for a protected area. Furthermore, the input and support of key stakeholders is considered vitally important in the management of protected areas and in the implementation of many of the actions set out in their management plans. For this reason a comprehensive public participation process has been undertaken in preparing the management plan for Spioenkop Nature Reserve.

1.2 Approach and objectives of the consultation process

The approach to consultation in preparing the management plan for Spioenkop Nature Reserve has been to target communities in the area around the reserve together with municipalities, relevant government authorities and other key stakeholders. The process has been targeted at key representatives of stakeholder groups in an effort to enable meaningful input in the development of the management plan. The objectives of the public consultation process have been to:

 Ensure that the communities around the reserve are aware of its importance and the conservation imperatives that formed the basis for its proclamation.  Discuss and agree on the values of Spioenkop Nature Reserve in order to come to a common understanding of why it is important and should be protected.  Canvas aspirations, issues, concerns and conflicts associated with the reserve that must be resolved through the management plan.  Provide additional information that is required by individual stakeholders and to request input and pertinent information that may aid the process and the management of the reserve from stakeholders.

The list of participants who have been consulted and who have attended meetings as part of the public consultation process is attached in Appendix A.

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 3

1.3 Consultation process

The public stakeholder consultation commenced in June 2013 when the stakeholder workshop was advertised in the Illanga, Isoleswe, Mercury, Estcourt and Midlands News and the Witness between 6 and 8 June 2013. See Appendix B for the minutes of the stakeholder meeting, Appendix C for scanned copies of the adverts, Appendix D for the Background document and Appendix F for scanned copies of the attendance registers. The stakeholder workshop took place at the Spioenkop Nature Reserve on 3 July 2013. Prior to the stakeholder workshop a background information document was made available to stakeholders on the Ezemvelo website and was also mailed to stakeholders on request.

Groups that were invited included district and local municipalities, neighbours, neighbouring communities and non-governmental conservation organisations. See Appendix B for the attendance register and minutes of the meeting.

The draft protected area management plan was made available to public review for a period of three weeks. The draft plan was advertised in the llanga, Isoleswe, Mercury, Estcourt and Midland News and the Witness on 12 to 14 September 2013. All stakeholders who attended the stakeholder workshop were informed either through e-mail, telephonically or through verbal messages to the various communities by the Officer in Charge.

Hard copies of the documents were made available at the Umtshezi and Okhahlamba Local Municipality, uThukela District Municipalities and at the Weenen Nature Reserve gates.

Closing dates for comments was 4 October 2013 and the document was available for review for three weeks. Due to the fact that no comments were received the Park Planning Committee did not meet to consider comments.

Additionally adverts were posted at the following places:

. OK Winterton Notice Board . Spar Winterton Notice Board This process and the overall process for the development of the protected area management plan are summarised in Table 1.1 below.

Table 1.1 Summary of the protected area management plan development process

Date Activity

6 June 2013 Adverts for stakeholder workshop in Ilanga, Isoleswe, Mercury and the Witness

7 June 2013 Advert for stakeholder workshop in the Estcourt and Midlands News

3 July 2013 Stakeholder workshop

September 2013 Draft protected area management plan for public comment

13 September Public comment invited 2013

October 2013 Consideration of public comment

30 October 2013 Additional stakeholder meeting requested by stakeholder

November 2013 Submit final document to Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife committees for approval

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 4

2) KEY FINDINGS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTA TION PROCESS

The reserve currently does not have a secured boundary fence and this is continually exacerbated by the stealing and vandalising of the fence. This is a concern especially considering the presence of White Rhino in the reserve. Another effect of the state of the boundary fence is human/animal conflict due to game (including zebra) escaping to neighbouring farmers. The relationship with neighbours needs to be improved as there are mistrust present based on historical and current issues relating to disease control, the ineffectiveness of the fence and human/animal conflict issues.

Furthermore inappropriate land-uses in the area surrounding the reserve could potentially present threats to the reserve. The reserve tourism and management infrastructure need to be assessed and upgraded where required. There is the potential to expand eco-tourism facilities but the feasibility of this must be investigated with due consideration to current and required service infrastructure.

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 5

3) COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING REVIEW OF THE D RAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN

Name Comment Response

B C Coventry Overgrazing of the buffer zone and river sand removal Management in the buffer zone of the reserve focuses PO Box 208 from the Venter Spruit. Suggest proper control of the on maintaining good relationships with neighbours as Bergville area, including fencing and patrolling as well as stopping well as encouraging compatible land use in the area. 3350 of individuals entering the area – hunting with dogs. Legally Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife has no right to control 0364481880 Maybe charging for the river sand as a source of revenue access in the buffer area and should illegal sand mining could stop this practice. take place, the information should be given through to the relevant Department of Environmental Affairs compliance officer. Similarly poaching incidents should be reported to the relevant District Conservation Officer. (Department of Environmental Affairs - 033 347 1820 and DCO Ephraim Mavuso – 0835918907)

Re-fencing the complete reserve so access can be We note this comment and the securing and re-fencing restricted and game could be better controlled without of the boundary has been identified in the management so much loss. plan as a priority project that requires additional funding.

Proper management of the animals with particular Human / animal conflict is addressed in the management attention to problem animals, especially species that plan with the first step requiring the proper fencing of affect neighbouring farmers. Eland, Kudu, Waterbuck the reserve. Disease management has also been causing crop damage. Wildebeest, Blesbok. – Diseases. addressed with the implementation of procedures to manage and monitor through surveillance. Potential disease has been addressed in the management plan. Table 6.8 Framework for conservation management – wildlife management and conservation targets (Page 77).

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 6

Suggestion: Utilising renewable resources to generate Resource utilisation is currently taking place as a benefit revenue. Here I mean thatch grass, wood and silt in the to various communities. The reserve management dam. This could all become a valuable asset and revenue committee will consider each request for resources source. through the relevant process and in line with various policies. In terms of the silt removal, the land based component of this is an inappropriate activity for a protected area, in terms of the dam; this will fall under the authority of the Department of Water Affairs who is responsible for the management and maintenance of the water body.

Develop a camp on the North Shore for fisherman to We note this comment and this will be considered during utilize or even a fishing club. a feasibility study for tourism infrastructure and activities.

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 7

REFERENCES Spioenkop Nature Reserve: Management Plan. Version 1.0 (2013), Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg.

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 8

APPENDIX A LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS WHO HAVE BEEN INVITE D TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE

NAME ORGANISATION CONTACT

Ian King Chairman of Mount Royal Conservancy [email protected]

C Rossouw AMAFA amafa@[email protected]

[email protected]

Fanie Meitz Three Tree Lodge Delivered through reserve manager

Barry Coventry Hambrook Delivered through reserve manager

G Farley Wildlands Trust [email protected]

Steven Nel Delivered through reserve manager

Craig Rushton COGTA [email protected]

Nicholas Theron Birdlife SA [email protected]

Garry Green Delivered through re serve manager

Spioenkop Lodge Delivered through reserve manager

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 9

APPENDIX B MINUTES OF THE STAKEHOLDER MEETING

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 10

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 11

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 12

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 13

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 14

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 15

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 16

APPENDIX C SCANS OF ADVERTISEMENTS FOR T HE PUBLIC MEETING AND PUBLIC REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 17

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 18

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 19

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 20

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 21

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 22

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 23

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 24

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 25

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 26

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 27

S P I O E N K O P NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEM E N T P L A N – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 28

APPENDIX D BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT CIRCULATED PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 29

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 30

APPENDIX E COPIES OF STANDARD I NVITATIONS SENT TO KNOWN STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER W ORKSHOP

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 31

APPENDIX F SCANNED COPIES OF AT TENDANCE REGISTER SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 32

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 33

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 34

APPENDIX G STAKEHOLDER PRESENTA TION - SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 35

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 36

SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 37

Table of Contents