Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE KwaZulu-Natal South Africa Protected Area Management Plan: Public Participation Report 2013 Prepared by Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife Protected Area Management Planning Unit TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS 2 1.1 The context of stakeholder consultation 3 1.2 Approach and objectives of the consultation process 3 1.3 Consultation process 4 2) KEY FINDINGS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS 5 3) COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN 6 REFERENCES APPENDIX A LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS WHO HAVE BEEN INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE APPENDIX B MINUTES OF MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS HELD ON 29 JANUARY 2013 APPENDIX C SCANS OF THE ADVERTISEMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC MEETING AND PUBLIC REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX D BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT CIRCULATED PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP APPENDIX E COPIES OF STANDARD INVITATIONS SENT TO KNOWN STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP APPENDIX F SCANNED COPIES OF ATTENDANCE REGISTERS APPENDIX G STAKEHOLDER PRESENTATION SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 1 1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTA TION PROCESS Spioenkop Nature Reserve is situated off the Provincial Road R600, 27kms south-west of Ladysmith, 11kms north of Winterton and 6kms north-east of Bergville as the crow flies. The reserve consists of the state owned Spioenkop Dam, situated at its centre, and surrounded, predominantly, by vegetation types such as the KwaZulu-Natal Highland Thornveld covering approximately 97% of the Reserve, as well as a small portion of the Northern KwaZulu-Natal Shrubland in the north-east of the reserve which covers about 3% of the Reserve. The Spioenkop Dam is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA). The dam divides SNR into two sections, the South-Shore Section (2 304 ha) south of the dam and North-Shore Section (1 666 ha) north of the dam. The original Spioenkop Dam, which is located at the centre of the Reserve, was developed in the late 60s with the aim of tapping into the hitherto relatively unutilized water resources of the Upper uThukela River for the promotion of industrial expansion in the Ladysmith-Colenso-Bergville area as well as for irrigation expansion along the uThukela River itself, including the Bloukrantz River Valley. It was also to supply supplementary water to the Vaal River basin for urban and industrial use. The reserve is a key component of the protected area system in the region of KwaZulu-Natal. The protected area is situated east of the northern section of the uKhahlamba Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site and to the North West of Wagon Drift Dam Nature Reserve and Weenen Nature Reserve (Map A – Location of Spioenkop Nature Reserve); within the Uthukela District Municipality and the oKhahlamba Local Municipality. Spioenkop was proclaimed initially in 1975 as the Spioenkop Public Resort Nature Reserve; in 1988 additional farms were consolidated and proclaimed as part of the Spioenkop Public Resort Nature Reserve with a total size of 7283 ha. The reserve is no longer known by the full proclaimed name but as Spioenkop Nature Reserve. The famous historic battlefield site of Spioenkop hill can be accessed on foot from the reserve or by road outside of the reserve, this site offers stunning views of the Drakensberg Mountains and foothills. Spioenkop Nature Reserve is a registered Important Bird Area (IBA, SA 062) with Cape Vulture (Gyps coprotheros), the rare Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus) and occasionally the Lappet faced Vulture (Torgos traceliotus) utilising the vulture restaurant in the reserve. The reserve protects important vegetation types including KwaZulu-Natal Highveld Thornveld with a small portion of the vulnerable Temperate Alluvial Vegetation present in the north east of the reserve. Small portions of the vulnerable vegetation type, Northern KwaZulu-Natal Moist Grassland are present in the western and north western parts of the reserve. Important animal species such as White Rhino (Ceratotherium simum) is also represented in the reserve. The National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act (No.57 of 2003) requires that Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife compile and implement Protected Area Management Plans in all of the protected areas under its jurisdiction. In preparing these plans it is important that participatory processes, involving local communities and other stakeholders are implemented in an effort to ensure that all key issues are considered and incorporated into the management plan. This public participation report provides the background to the process followed in developing the management plan for Spioenkop Nature Reserve. It reflects the inputs and involvement of stakeholders in developing the plan and provides a summary of the key issues that have emerged SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 2 from this process. This document will form a supporting document to the management plan, providing some of the details and context of how the plan was formulated. 1.1 The context of stakeholder consultation In terms of Section 39(3) of the Protected Areas Act, consultation is required with municipalities, other organs of state, local communities and other affected parties, which have an interest in the area, when compiling a management plan for a protected area. Furthermore, the input and support of key stakeholders is considered vitally important in the management of protected areas and in the implementation of many of the actions set out in their management plans. For this reason a comprehensive public participation process has been undertaken in preparing the management plan for Spioenkop Nature Reserve. 1.2 Approach and objectives of the consultation process The approach to consultation in preparing the management plan for Spioenkop Nature Reserve has been to target communities in the area around the reserve together with municipalities, relevant government authorities and other key stakeholders. The process has been targeted at key representatives of stakeholder groups in an effort to enable meaningful input in the development of the management plan. The objectives of the public consultation process have been to: Ensure that the communities around the reserve are aware of its importance and the conservation imperatives that formed the basis for its proclamation. Discuss and agree on the values of Spioenkop Nature Reserve in order to come to a common understanding of why it is important and should be protected. Canvas aspirations, issues, concerns and conflicts associated with the reserve that must be resolved through the management plan. Provide additional information that is required by individual stakeholders and to request input and pertinent information that may aid the process and the management of the reserve from stakeholders. The list of participants who have been consulted and who have attended meetings as part of the public consultation process is attached in Appendix A. SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 3 1.3 Consultation process The public stakeholder consultation commenced in June 2013 when the stakeholder workshop was advertised in the Illanga, Isoleswe, Mercury, Estcourt and Midlands News and the Witness between 6 and 8 June 2013. See Appendix B for the minutes of the stakeholder meeting, Appendix C for scanned copies of the adverts, Appendix D for the Background document and Appendix F for scanned copies of the attendance registers. The stakeholder workshop took place at the Spioenkop Nature Reserve on 3 July 2013. Prior to the stakeholder workshop a background information document was made available to stakeholders on the Ezemvelo website and was also mailed to stakeholders on request. Groups that were invited included district and local municipalities, neighbours, neighbouring communities and non-governmental conservation organisations. See Appendix B for the attendance register and minutes of the meeting. The draft protected area management plan was made available to public review for a period of three weeks. The draft plan was advertised in the llanga, Isoleswe, Mercury, Estcourt and Midland News and the Witness on 12 to 14 September 2013. All stakeholders who attended the stakeholder workshop were informed either through e-mail, telephonically or through verbal messages to the various communities by the Officer in Charge. Hard copies of the documents were made available at the Umtshezi and Okhahlamba Local Municipality, uThukela District Municipalities and at the Weenen Nature Reserve gates. Closing dates for comments was 4 October 2013 and the document was available for review for three weeks. Due to the fact that no comments were received the Park Planning Committee did not meet to consider comments. Additionally adverts were posted at the following places: . OK Winterton Notice Board . Spar Winterton Notice Board This process and the overall process for the development of the protected area management plan are summarised in Table 1.1 below. Table 1.1 Summary of the protected area management plan development process Date Activity 6 June 2013 Adverts for stakeholder workshop in Ilanga, Isoleswe, Mercury and the Witness 7 June 2013 Advert for stakeholder workshop in the Estcourt and Midlands News 3 July 2013 Stakeholder workshop September 2013 Draft protected area management plan for public comment 13 September Public comment invited 2013 October 2013 Consideration of public comment 30 October 2013 Additional stakeholder meeting requested by stakeholder November 2013 Submit final document to Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife committees for approval SPIOENKOP NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 4 2) KEY FINDINGS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTA TION PROCESS The reserve currently does not have a secured boundary fence and this is continually exacerbated by the stealing and vandalising of the fence. This is a concern especially considering the presence of White Rhino in the reserve.
Recommended publications
  • Umtshezi Municipality
    UMTSHEZI MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 UMTSHEZI MUNICIPALITY 2008 / 2009 IDP REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1- STRATEGIC DIRECTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 FOCUS OF THE IDP REVIEW PROCESS 1.3 UMTSHEZI VISION 1.4 MISSION STATEMENT 1.5 BACKLOG ANALYSIS, CHALLENGES AND OBJECTIVES 1.6 CHALLENGES AND OBJECTIVES 1.7 POWERS AND FUNCTIONS 1.8 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS TO ENSURE BETTER SERVICE CHAPTER 2 - UMTSHEZI STATUS QUO 2.1 POPULATION SIZE 2.1.1 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 2.1.2 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION PER WARD 2.2 GENDER 2.3 AGE BREAKDOWN 2.4 INCOME PROFILE 2.5 PHYSICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILES: A DISTRICT VIEW 2.6 UMTSHEZI ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 2.6.1 FORMAL SECTOR 2.6.2 INFORMAL SECTOR 2.7 GEOGRAPHICAL DATA CHAPTER 3 - NATIONAL KPAs as DRIVERS OF UMTSHEZI SERVICE DELIVERY 3.1. INTRODUCTION 3.2. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3.3 INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFORMATION 3.4 LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3.5 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 3.5.1 FINANCIAL ARRRANGEMENT MANAGEMENT 3.5.2 INCOME FINANCIAL RESOURCES 3.5.3 EXPENDITURE 3.5.4 FINANCE POLICIES 3.5.5 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN 3.6 GOOD GOVERNANCE AND COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 2 UMTSHEZI MUNICIPALITY 2008 / 2009 IDP REVIEW CHAPTER 4 - IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND MONITORING (PROJECTS SCHEDULE PER KPA) 1. SOCIAL AND LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2. INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES: ELECTRICITY 3. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFORMATION 4. DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE 5. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ANNEXURE A: SECTOR PLANS 3 UMTSHEZI MUNICIPALITY 2008 / 2009 IDP REVIEW PHASE ONE: SETTING THE UMTSHEZI DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT 4 UMTSHEZI MUNICIPALITY 2008 / 2009 IDP REVIEW CHAPTER 1 STRATEGIC DIRECTION 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Estcourt – Weenen Line 1906
    REMEMBERING THE ESTCOURT – WEENEN LINE 1906 – 1983 Bruno Martin Published by the RAILWAY HISTORY SOCIETY, an interest group of the Railway Society of Southern Africa (Natal Branch) Founded 1960 “Travelling on this little train of the thorn country is a real experience. It is certainly the only train in the world which gives the right of way to pythons. The inoffensive reptiles are common in the surrounding bush and the train always does its best to stop and allow them to cross the line. Numerous rock rabbits and various antelopes also have their homes along the track.” - TV Bulpin, Treasure of Travels Series, 5: Johannesburg to Durban, 1973. NGG13 no. 78 about to leave Weenen for Estcourt on 3 March 1979, with Driver Billy Bester in discussion. Photo: Don Baker More than a quarter of a century has passed since the narrow-gauge railway between Estcourt and Weenen was closed. The last revenue-earning service departed unceremoniously from Weenen station on Wednesday afternoon, 31 August 1983. On Monday, 5 September, the remaining goods wagons were retrieved from Weenen and the very last working was for weed spraying on Saturday, 5 October. CONTENTS Setting the Scene Page 3 Survey and Construction 3 Stations, Halts and Sidings 5 Water Supplies 5 List of Bridges 5 Permanent Way 6 Opening and Commencement of Service 6 Original Stations and Halts 6 Later Additions 6 Train Schedules 7 Motive Power 8 Mr J. Billy Bester 9 Map of the Route 10 The Final Years 12 Closure 14 Appendix : A few details of the Rolling Stock 18 References 20 - 2 - SETTING THE SCENE While South Africa’s standard for main line construction was set to a modest three-and-a-half feet (1 067 millimetres) gauge, there were instances where the cost of constructing that gauge was considered too high and the width between the rails was reduced even further.
    [Show full text]
  • Review 2009/2010
    I.D.P RR EEVVIIEEWW 2200 0099//22001100 Prepared By : Department Strategic Planning and Economic Development Address : PO Box 116 Ladysmith, 3370 Email : [email protected] Tel: 036 638 2400 Fax: 036 635 5501 Page 1 of 147 UThukela District Municipality IDP Review 2009/10 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Page Section A: Executive summary . 03-09 Section B: The current situational analysis that informed the IDP for 2009/10. 10-24 Section C: Development Strategies. 25-69 Section D: Spatial Development Framework (SDF) and Land use Management Framework 70-86 Section E: Sector Involvement 87-94 Section F: Implementation Plan 95-96 Section G: Projects 97-99 Section H: Municipal budget overview 100-108 Section I: Organisational performance management system 109-145 Section J: List of annexures 146 Section K: List of appendices 146 Page 2 of 147 UThukela District Municipality IDP Review 2009/10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION A The structure of this plan is based on the revised approach and framework for IDP’s 2007/08 published and endorsed by the National IDP Steering Committee. The uThukela District Municipality, as a government institution is legally obligated to develop a municipal Integrated Development Plan (IDP), which will act as the guiding document towards municipal development and service delivery. According to chapter 5 of the Municipal systems Act (MSA) of 2000 as amended states that, all municipalities have to undertake an IDP process to produce Integrated Development Plans (IDP) The uThukela Integrated Development Plan is based on the legislative mandate that governs the operations of the local government sphere. In addition, the IDP framework Guide has been taken into consideration during the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    ACER Africa: Ekuvukeni Bulk Water Pipeline - Wetland, Aquatic and Vegetation Study Project: SPS-REP-301-19_20 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT WETLAND , AQUATIC AND VEGETATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED EKUVUKENI BULK WATER PIPELINE IN THE ALFRED DUMA LOCAL AND UTHUKELA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITIES, SOUTH AFRICA PREPARED FOR: ACER AFRICA (PTY) LTD. PREPARED BY: Environmental Assurance (Pty) Ltd. SUBMITTED TO: Giles Churchill EMAIL: [email protected] DATE: March 2020 Environmental AssurancePROPOSAL (Pty) Ltd NUMBER: SPS-REP-301-19_20 Client Restricted Aquatic Division ENVASS www.envass.co.zaVERSION: AA i ACER Africa: Ekuvukeni Bulk Water Pipeline - Wetland, Aquatic and Vegetation Study Project: SPS-REP-301-19_20 DOCUMENT CONTROL Wetland, Vegetation and Aquatic Impact Assessment of the Proposed Ekuvukeni Bulk Water Document Title Pipeline in the Alfred Duma Local and uThukela District Municipalities, South Africa Report Number SPS-REP-301-19_20 Version AA Date of Field 28th November 2019 Assessment Date of Report 2nd March 2020 Client: ACER Africa (Pty) Ltd. Contact Person: Giles Churchill Submitted to Position: Environmental Assessment Practitioner Email: [email protected] x1 ACER Africa (Pty) Ltd. Distribution x1 Environmental Assurance (Pty) Ltd. EXPERTISE OF AUTHOR Registered with South African Council for Natural Scientific Professionals (SACNASP) (no. 117334). Accreditations Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) accredited wetland assessment practitioner. DWS accredited SASS5 aquatic biomonitoring practitioner. QUALITY CONTROL Author Co-author Technical Review Name Wayne Westcott Wietsche Roets Designation Aquatic and Wetland Ecologist Signature Date 24-02-2020 DISCLAIMER Copyright ENVASS. All Rights Reserved - This documentation is considered the intellectual property of ENVASS. Unauthorised reproduction or distribution of this documentation or any portion of it may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and violators will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under law.
    [Show full text]
  • Indaka Municipality Towards Developmental Local Government, Improving the Lives of All Its Inhabitants
    Draft Integrated Development Plan (IDP) 2014/2015 to 2018/2019 March 2014 Municipal Profiling (Position Statement) Basic Fact Sheet for the Indaka Local Municipal Area Institutional Overview Indaka Local Municipality (KZ233) Newly Established in 18 December 2000 (Category B Municipality) Powers & Functions: Solid Waste 84(1)(e) & Municipal Roads 84(1)(f) 10 Wards (Notice 143 – 13 July 2000) Municipal Mayor – Cllr NB. Mchunu Municipal Manager – Mr K. S Khumalo Situational Overview Extent of Municipal Area equals 990km² Population 113,644 (21,372 hh) Population Density 100/km² Population Composition: Black (99.9%), White (0.03%), Coloured (0.01%) Male 44% and Female 55.8% Age Profile: 51% below 20 years of age Dependency Ratio of 63% No Formal Education of 31% Unemployment represents 72% of total population Financial Grant Dependency equals 92% 143 Settlements that vary in size scattered throughout Land Ownership: 48% Ingonyama Trust, 51% State land, & 1% Private 84 farms Primary Node: Ekuvukeni Village (R293) Secondary Node: Mhlumayo Village Tertiary Node: Sahlumbe & Limehill Major Road traversing MR32 (Ladysmith Pomeroy Link) 1734m Above Sea Level (Highest Point) Two Major River Systems: uThukela & Indaka River Agriculture: Low Potential (grazing dominant) Tourism Opportunity: Cannibal Site & Community Based Tourism Manufacturing / Industries: None - closest Ezakheni Service Delivery Backlogs RDP Standard (Stats SA 2011): Water 4,710 (22%), Sanitation 5,443 (25%) and Electricity 49% Challenges No Well-Established
    [Show full text]
  • Profile: Uthukela District Municipality
    2 PROFILE: UTHUKELA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROFILE: UTHUKELA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY 3 CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 4 2. Brief Overview .................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Historical Perspective ........................................................................................................ 7 2.2. Location ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.3. Spatial Integration ............................................................................................................. 9 2.3. Land Ownership .............................................................................................................. 11 3. Social Development Profile ............................................................................. 12 3.1. Key Social Demographics ....................................................................................................... 12 3.1.1. Population ....................................................................................................................... 12 3.1.2. Gender, Age and Race ......................................................................................................... 12 3.1.3. Households .......................................................................................................................... 13 3.2. Health ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Uthukela District Municipality Biodiversity Sector Plan. Unpublished Report, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg
    BIODIVERSITY SECTOR PLAN FOR THE UTHUKELA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, KWAZULU-NATAL TECHNICAL REPORT Authors: Afzelia Environmental Consultants cc Wolfgang Kanz John Richardson Editors Tim O’Connor & Associates Tim O’Connor Contributors EnvironDev Gina Thompson Suggested Citation: Kanz W.A., O’Connor T.G., Richardson J., Nel G, Nel, W. The uThukela District Municipality Biodiversity Sector Plan. Unpublished report, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg. 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biodiversity Act introduced several legislated planning tools to assist with the management and conservation of South Africa’s biological diversity. These include the declaration of “Bioregions” and the publication of “Bioregional Plans”. Bioregional plans are usually an output of a systematic spatial conservation assessment of a region. They identify areas of conservation priority, and constraints and opportunities for implementation of the plan. The precursor to a Bioregional Plan is a Biodiversity Sector Plan (BSP), which is the official reference for biodiversity priorities to be taken into account in land-use planning and decision-making by all sectors within the District Municipality. The consultant team was appointed to fulfil the requirements of a BSP for the uThukela District Municipality, as informed by SANBI, the Bioregional Guidelines (DEAT, 2007), current best practice, and the EKZNW Project Terms of Reference. The final product is a series of maps highlighting those areas that are critically important for biodiversity, with accompanying land-use and management guidelines that serve to guide decision-making and inform multi-sectoral planning. The process involved extensive mapping of vegetation types and species data (where available), ecological processes, transformation and threats, and setting of biodiversity targets.
    [Show full text]
  • KZN Administrative Boundaries Western Cape 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E
    cogta Department: Locality Map Cooperative Governance & Traditional Affairs Limpopo Mpumalanga North West Gauteng PROVINCE OF KWAZULU-NATAL Free State KwaZulu-Natal Northern Cape Eastern Cape KZN Administrative Boundaries Western Cape 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E Mozambique Mboyi Swaziland 5! Kuhlehleni 5! Kosi Bay 5! Manyiseni MATENJWA 5! Ndumo MPUMALANGA T. C 5! KwaNgwanase Jozini Local 5! 5! Manguzi 27°0'0"S Nkunowini Boteler Point 27°0'0"S 5! Municipality 5! (KZN272) Sihangwane 5! Phelandaba 5! MNGOMEZULU T. C TEMBE Kwazamazam T. C 5! Dog Point Machobeni 5! 5! Ingwavuma 5! Mboza Umhlabuyalingana Local ! 5 Municipality (KZN271) NYAWO T. C Island Rock 5! Mpontshani 5! Hully Point Vusumuzi 5! 5! Braunschweig 5! Nhlazana Ngcaka Golela Ophondweni ! 5! Khiphunyawo Rosendale Zitende 5! 5! 5 5! 5! 5! KwaNduna Oranjedal 5! Tholulwazi 5! Mseleni MASHBANE Sibayi 5! NTSHANGASE Ncotshane 5! 5! T. C 5! T. C NTSHANGASE T. C SIQAKATA T. C Frischgewaagd 5! Athlone MASIDLA 5! DHLAMINI MSIBI Dumbe T. C SIMELANE 5! Pongola Charlestown 5! T. C T. C Kingholm 5! T. C Mvutshini 5! Othombothini 5! KwaDlangobe 5! 5! Gobey's Point Paulpietersburg Jozini 5! Simlangetsha Fundukzama 5! 5! ! 5! Tshongwe 5 ! MABASO Groenvlei Hartland 5 T. C Lang's Nek 5! eDumbe Local 5! NSINDE 5! ZIKHALI Municipality Opuzane Candover T. C 5! Majuba 5! 5! Mbazwana T. C Waterloo 5! (KZN261) MTETWA 5! T. C Itala Reserve Majozini 5! KwaNdongeni 5! 5! Rodekop Pivana 5! ! Emadlangeni Local ! 5! Magudu 5 5 Natal Spa Nkonkoni Jesser Point Boeshoek 5! 5!5! Municipality 5! Ubombo Sodwana Bay Louwsburg UPhongolo Local ! (KZN253) 5! 5 Municipality Umkhanyakude (KZN262) Mkhuze Khombe Swaartkop 5! 5! 5! District Madwaleni 5! Newcastle 5! Utrecht Coronation Local Municipality 5! 5! Municipality NGWENYA Liefeldt's (KZN252) Entendeka T.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Development Plan Review 2020/2021
    c INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW 2020/2021 “LAST REVIEW OF THE FOURTH IDP GENERATION” uThukela District Municipality Prepared By: The Office of the Municipal Manager: IDP Unit P a g e | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 7 PURPOSE. ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 WHO ARE WE .................................................................................................................................................. 7 WARDS AND TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY ....................................................................................................... 10 ECONOMIC PROFILE ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 LONG TERM VISION ................................................................................................................ 12 1.2 HOW THE IDP WAS DEVELOPED ............................................................................................. 12 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION................................................................................................................................. 15 SECTOR DEPARTMENT INVOLVEMENTS ....................................................................................................... 20 ALIGNMENT WITH THE FAMILY
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall Averages Estcourt
    relations with Instlutt-m!o ~ I F-Igure 6 1 Map of the Thu"ela Hiospt-ere Reserve showing core Zones transmons zones and buffer lonec; 105 ~rst of 1abies Table 2 1 Three conservation paradigms 16 Table 31 Methods and tools for particular Information purposes 42 Table 4 1 Rare and Endangered mammal species occurnng In It e Thukela Biosphere Reserve 56 Table 4 2 Main vegetation types and chma« species In the TAR 58 Table 43 Stocking rates In the MlIdtm·Greytown area 61 Table 4 4 t and use In the T8R 63 Table 61 Stakeholder groups In the 1BR 107 Table 6}' Levels and elements In natural resource decision making In the TAR 116 " List of Figures Figure Page Figure 1 1 Situation Map of the Thllkel~ Biosphere Reserve 4 Figure 4 1 Map of the Thukela Biosphere Reserve showing land use. veld condition and surrounding communities 49 FIQure 42 SOil M...p of the Weenen regl::>" showing extent of gully erosion 50 Figure 4 3 Annual rainfall averages for Sun Valley Weenen 52 Figure 44 Annual rainfall averages for Estcourt 53 FIQ'Jre 4 5 Annual rainfall aver ages for Waterval Weenen 54 Figure 46 Annual rainfall averages for H6avltree Estcourt 55 Figure 4 7 Vegetation map of the Thukela Biosphere region 59 Figure 5 1 Tlmellne exercise completed by members of Tugela Estates Community 79 Figure 5 2 TImellne exercrse completed by members of Tugela Estates Community 80 Figure 5 3 Participatory Map completed by members of Tugela Estates Community showing concern WIth en won mental degradation as manlfesteci by soil erosion 82 Figure 5 4 PartiCipatory Venn I'jlagram exerCise showing perceived problems experienced by eMchunwenl commurnty 85 Figure 5 5 Participatory Venn dlagrafl" eXEl:cI!'e shOWing perceived oroblems affecltng the Thembahhle community 88 Figure 56 Map completed by members of the Thombahhle community dfllj.l.cltng ~erce.,..,ed bouncanes of th~ TBR 90 FIQlJ.-e5 7 PartiCipatory Venn diagram exercise completed by members of the Themb£lhhle community deplr.ltng community Key Lessons and the Way Forward 121 Chapter 7 Conclusion .
    [Show full text]
  • Okhahlamba Integrated Development Plan Review
    JUNE 2013 March 2015 OKHAHLAMBA INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW DRAFT 2015/ 2016 OKHAHLAMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Okhahlamba Local Municipality 259 Kingsway Street Bergville 3350 Tel Number: +27 036 448 8000 Fax Number: +27 036 448 1986 P a g e | i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 THE OKHAHLAMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY ......................................................................................................... 1 DEVELOPMENT OF THE IDP ................................................................................................................................ 5 Key Challenges .................................................................................................................................................... 7 LONG TERM VISION ............................................................................................................................................ 9 How Okhahlamba will unlock and address the Key Challenges.......................................................................... 9 Spatial Development Framework (SDF) ............................................................................................................ 14 1 GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weenen Nature Reserve
    WEENEN NATURE RESERVE KwaZulu-Natal South Africa Protected Area Management Plan: Public Participation Report 2013 Prepared by Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife Protected Area Management Planning Unit TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS 2 1.1 The context of stakeholder consultation 3 1.2 Approach and objectives of the consultation process 3 1.3 Consultation process 3 2) KEY FINDINGS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS 5 3) COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN 6 REFERENCES APPENDIX A LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS WHO HAVE BEEN INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEENEN NATURE RESERVE APPENDIX B MINUTES OF MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS HELD ON 29 JANUARY 2013 APPENDIX C SCANS OF THE ADVERTISEMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC MEETING AND PUBLIC REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX D BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT CIRCULATED PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP APPENDIX E COPIES OF STANDARD INVITATIONS SENT TO KNOWN STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP APPENDIX F SCANNED COPIES OF ATTENDANCE REGISTERS APPENDIX G STAKEHOLDER PRESENTATIONS WEENEN NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 1 1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTA TION PROCESS Weenen Nature Reserve is situated on the Draycott Plain in the centre of KwaZulu-Natal Province of the Republic of South Africa. The protected area lies south of the R74 provincial road, approximately eight km west of Weenen and 28 km from the town of Estcourt; within the Uthukela District Municipality and the Umtshezi Local Municipality region. The reserve is located approximately 30 km north east of Wagendrift Nature Reserve and approximately 45 km south east of Spioenkop Nature Reserve.
    [Show full text]