Ambassador for World Peace Why Herbert W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ambassador for World Peace Why Herbert W AMBASSADOR FOR WORLD PEACE WHY HERBERT W. ARMSTRONG MET WITH HUNDREDS OF WORLD LEADERS GERALD FLURRY AMBASSADOR FOR WORLD PEACE WHY HERBERT W. ARMSTRONG MET WITH HUNDREDS OF WORLD LEADERS GERALD FLURRY THIS BOOKLET IS NOT TO BE SOLD. It is a free educational service in the public interest, published by the Philadelphia Church of God. © 2017 Philadelphia Church of God All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Scriptures in this publication are quoted from the King James Version, unless otherwise noted. n the 1970s and 1980s, one private citizen was jetting around the world and meeting with I hundreds of world leaders. He met presidents, prime ministers, kings, emperors, princes, legislators, ambassadors, generals, officers, mayors, judges, scientists, educators, magnates and executives. He talked with heads of state and heads of government in their offices at their invitations. Who was this man? He wasn’t a head of government; he wasn’t even a government official. He wasn’t a captain of industry; he wasn’t even a businessman. He wasn’t a billionaire or millionaire. He was a man named Herbert W. Armstrong. Mr. Armstrong was a man who actually gave up his business to follow what he read in the Bible. He followed God and lived for decades in poverty. He eventually led a church and a college. He did not seek to become a world traveler, a friend of prime ministers, an unofficial ambassador for world peace. Even if he had tried, he never could have achieved a fraction of what he ended up doing. What Mr. Armstrong did in the 1970s and ’80s was nothing short of miraculous. “I have exciting news!” he wrote from Hong Kong in a November 26, 1973, letter to supporters of the Church. “As this new dimension of the great Work of the living God gets under way there is already tremendous accomplishment! Never in the history of humanity has anything like it happened before! Never has the living God carried His message through His human servants in this manner before.” The “tremendous accomplishment” Mr. Armstrong was referring to was his taking the message of God to prominent world leaders. This is an aspect of Mr. Armstrong’s work that we 1 AMBASSADOR FOR WORLD PEACE need to understand more deeply as time goes on because it relates to our time today. When God called him into His ministry, Mr. Armstrong taught God’s message, the good news of the coming Kingdom of God, to only a few scattered people in Oregon. Then the message reached several cities over the radio. Mr. Armstrong dreamed of God’s message reaching the whole northwest region of the United States. By the 1960s and 1970s, that message was reaching millions of people around the entire world. Despite the global reach among the English-speaking peoples, Mr. Armstrong was troubled by something. He wanted God’s message to reach Russians, Chinese, Indians, Japanese, Indonesians, Bangladeshis and others. But how could he reach them? In countries like the United States, Canada and Australia, the message could go straight to the people through television, radio or literature. Mr. Armstrong prayed earnestly about it and asked God to help him see how to reach them. God answered that prayer. He showed Mr. Armstrong that in order to be heard by the populations of these countries, he had to reach the national leaders first! An Open Door Sometime after Mr. Armstrong began praying about it, he received invitations to meet world leaders: one from a European king, then another from Jewish leaders. He couldn’t understand what was really happening or why. Gradually, the invitations began piling up. Yet he was still puzzled about why God was opening those doors. Finally, he made the connection: This was how God planned to get the gospel to those other nations! 2 WHY HERBERT W. ARMSTRONG MET WITH HUNDREDS OF WORLD LEADERS Mr. Armstrong frequently visited top government officials, including leaders who shaped the thoughts of their populations. These officials were in charge of communication; it was their responsibility to get information to the people. It is important to realize how much Mr. Armstrong did in those primarily Gentile nations. He visited presidents and kings who wanted to know what his beliefs were! In that 1973 co-worker letter, Mr. Armstrong continued: “Last April 28, I was decorated by the emperor and the government of Japan with the highest honor ever bestowed on a nonofficial non-Japanese. This gave me a very great credibility in Japan. Then I learned Prince Mikasa, brother of the emperor, had asked for me to give a Bible study on my next visit to Tokyo” (emphasis mine throughout). They wanted Mr. Armstrong to give them a Bible study! How unusual for a Gentile nation to ask to be taught from God’s Word! Fifty-eight of some of the most influential people in Japan attended a dinner that they held for Mr. Armstrong. Four speeches were given in Mr. Armstrong’s honor, one of which was delivered by the prince. Mr. Armstrong recalled that they said the “most complimentary things” about Ambassador College and himself! After these speeches, Mr. Armstrong had the opportunity to speak. He delivered a message about the gospel that had not been proclaimed to the world since the first century! Those leaders were given quite an impressive message. After his visit to Japan, Mr. Armstrong carried on to Saigon, Vietnam. There Mr. Armstrong talked to senators, members of Congress and the president. They asked him to stay for four days and give a public 3 AMBASSADOR FOR WORLD PEACE appearance! God was giving Mr. Armstrong special favor in the eyes of these world leaders. Mr. Armstrong said he was moved by their affection for him. After Vietnam, Mr. Armstrong went to Manila, Philippines. He said he was getting bolder all the time. He realized that this was a new dimension to the gospel— it had never been publicized this way before! God doesn’t do everything in cookie-cutter style. Sometimes He does things differently, because that is required to solve a problem. When you study what Mr. Armstrong was doing in these various nations and think about the impact he was having, you begin to see how much God loves this world. This initiative wasn’t from Mr. Armstrong—it wasn’t from a man. This was about God’s love for humanity! Jesus Christ died for all mankind, expressing the highest level of love. Through Mr. Armstrong, He was again showing His love! When you talk to someone about God’s way of life and you express it the right way, they may get excited about it. But usually their mood sours when you begin to talk about the need to change; they don’t like that part of the message. That is part of what made the way these leaders responded to Mr. Armstrong such a miracle. In New Delhi, India, Mr. Armstrong spoke before 100 of the most distinguished people of that nation. He recounted in the same co-worker letter, “This time I spoke with power and authority, until I wondered if I had spoken with such authority that many would be offended. But all comment afterward was very favorable, and I heard of no one being offended.” He gave them “the ‘strongest medicine’ ever to enter their ears,” as he put it. It was miraculous that they were not offended! Mr. Armstrong 4 WHY HERBERT W. ARMSTRONG MET WITH HUNDREDS OF WORLD LEADERS was bold and strong; it is almost shocking how blunt he was. He spoke with real authority! You would almost think these people would never invite him back. And while in a few cases they didn’t, a lot of them did. “I told them bluntly, by authority of the Creator God, Creator of the people of India, that they were responsible for what they had just heard!” wrote Mr. Armstrong. He told these world leaders that it was their responsibility to get God’s message to their people! God’s Spiritual Law in Motion Mr. Armstrong would talk to these people about the terrible state of affairs in the world. And he would show them that there is a cause for poverty, violence, war and everything else that plagues mankind. “[T]he living God had revealed to me the cause of all the world’s terrible evils and the suffering of humanity,” he wrote (ibid). Nobody else understood the source of these nations’ difficulties. But Mr. Armstrong told national leaders the real cause! That cause went right back to what happened in the Garden of Eden. I doubt a message like that would be well received in Chicago, New York City or Los Angeles. The people would probably say, “That’s just a children’s story—mere fables!” But Mr. Armstrong boldly talked about the Garden of Eden where mankind rejected the source of peace, prosperity and the abundant life that all men should be living. For 6,000 years, mankind has rejected that way of life and instead chosen another tree—the tree of death. Choosing that tree has resulted in the world we see around us. Nobody else ever talked to these leaders about that cause! They were fascinated by this understanding. They 5 AMBASSADOR FOR WORLD PEACE knew Mr. Armstrong didn’t come seeking a monetary offering; he didn’t ask for anything. He simply came to explain to them the cause of all the horrific problems, something they had never heard before. “I explained how God’s invisible spiritual law (the law of love—the Ten Commandments) was set in motion to cause peace, happiness, abundant well- being,” he wrote.
Recommended publications
  • Migration and Morality Amongst Sri Lankan Catholics
    UNLIKELY COSMPOLITANS: MIGRATION AND MORALITY AMONGST SRI LANKAN CATHOLICS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Bernardo Enrique Brown August, 2013 © 2013 Bernardo Enrique Brown ii UNLIKELY COSMOPOLITANS: MIGRATION AND MORALITY AMONGST SRI LANKAN CATHOLICS Bernardo Enrique Brown, Ph.D. Cornell University, 2013 Sri Lankan Catholic families that successfully migrated to Italy encountered multiple challenges upon their return. Although most of these families set off pursuing very specific material objectives through transnational migration, the difficulties generated by return migration forced them to devise new and creative arguments to justify their continued stay away from home. This ethnography traces the migratory trajectories of Catholic families from the area of Negombo and suggests that – due to particular religious, historic and geographic circumstances– the community was able to develop a cosmopolitan attitude towards the foreign that allowed many of its members to imagine themselves as ―better fit‖ for migration than other Sri Lankans. But this cosmopolitanism was not boundless, it was circumscribed by specific ethical values that were constitutive of the identity of this community. For all the cosmopolitan curiosity that inspired people to leave, there was a clear limit to what values and practices could be negotiated without incurring serious moral transgressions. My dissertation traces the way in which these iii transnational families took decisions, constantly navigating between the extremes of a flexible, rootless cosmopolitanism and a rigid definition of identity demarcated by local attachments. Through fieldwork conducted between January and December of 2010 in the predominantly Catholic region of Negombo, I examine the work that transnational migrants did to become moral beings in a time of globalization, individualism and intense consumerism.
    [Show full text]
  • RESULTS of PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - May 27, 1970 No of No of Total No
    RESULTS OF PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - May 27, 1970 No of No of Total No. of Votes No of No. and Name of Electoral District Name of the Elected Candidate Symbol allotted Votes Votes Polled including Registered Polled rejected rejected Electors 1 Colombo North V.A. Sugathadasa Elephant 20,930 97 44,511 Harris Wickremetunge Chair 13,783 W.I.A. Corsby Fernando Ship 164 A.S. Jayamaha Cockerel 97 2 Colombo Central R. Premadasa Elephant 69,310 5,491 240,597 99,265 Falil Caffoor Chair 63,624 Pieter Keuneman Star 58,557 M. Haleem Ishak Hand 41,716 C. Durairajah Umbrella 783 M. Haroun Careem Bell 413 Poopathy Saravanamuttu Ship 396 Panangadan Raman Krishnan Pair of Scales 307 3 Borella Kusala Abhayawardana (Mrs.) Key 16,421 50 32,810 42,849 M.H. Mohamed Elephant 15,829 M.A. Mansoor Pair of Scales 510 4 Colombo South J.R. Jayawardena Elephant 57,609 1,134 97,928 66,136 Bernard Soysa Key 36,783 Ratnasabapathy Wijaya Indra Eye 1,166 Ariyadasa Peiris Bell 561 A.S. Jayamaha Cockerel 241 Mudalige Justin Perera Flower 165 Joseph Beling Chair 164 Yathiendradasa Manampery Pair of Scales 105 5 Wattala A.D.J.L. Leo Hand 21,856 106 41,629 48,875 D. Shelton Jayasinghe Elephant 19,667 6 Negombo Denzil Fernando Elephant 20,457 132 36,509 44,284 Justin Fernando Hand 15,920 RESULTS OF PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - May 27, 1970 No of No of Total No. of Votes No of No. and Name of Electoral District Name of the Elected Candidate Symbol allotted Votes Votes Polled including Registered Polled rejected rejected Electors 7 Katana K.C.
    [Show full text]
  • New Faces in Parliament COLOMBO Sudarshani Fernandopulle Dr
    8 THE SUNDAY TIMES ELECTIONS Sunday April 18, 2010 New faces in Parliament COLOMBO Sudarshani Fernandopulle Dr. Ramesh Pathirana UPFA Nimal Senarath UPFA Born in 1960 Born in 1969. S. Udayan (Silvestri Wijesinghe Doctor by profession. A medical doctor by profes- alantin alias Uthayan) Born in 1969. R. Duminda Silva Former DMO of the sion. Born in 1972. Educated at Kirindigalla MV Born 1974. Negombo Hospital. Son of former Education Studied at Delft Maha and Ibbagamuwa MV. Businessman. Served for more than 10 Minister Richard Pathirana. Vidyalaya. Profession – Businessman. Studied at St. Peter’s Col- years at the Children’s Health Studied at Richmond Col- Joined EPDP in 1992. UNP Organiser of Rambo- lege, Colombo. Care Bureau of the Health. lege, Galle. Former deputy Chairman of dagalla in 2006. Elected to the Western Pro- Chief Organiser of Akmeemana. the Karaveddy Pradeshiya Sabha. Elected to the North Western Provincial Coun- vincial Council in 2009 on the Executive Committee Member of the Cey-Nor cil in 2009. UPFA ticket and topped the preferential votes Fishing Net Factory. Father of two. list. Wasantha Senanayake SLFP Chief Organiser for Kolonnawa. Barister of Law. Studied at Sajin Vaas Gunawardene Awarded Deshabimana Deshashakthi Janaran- S. Thomas’ Prep. Graduated Born in 1973. WANNI PUTTALAM jana from the National Peace Association. Univ. Buckingham LLB. Prominent business Great grandson of Ceylon’s personality. UPFA UPFA first Prime Minister D. S. SLFP Galle District Senanayake and F.R. Organiser. Noor Mohommed Farook Victory Anthony Perera Thilanga Sumathipala Senanayake. President’s Coordinating Born in 1975. Native of Born in 1949. Born 1964 Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia Judicial Barometer
    SOUTH ASIA JUDICIAL BAROMETER 1 The Law & Society Trust (LST) is a not-for- The Asian Forum for Human Rights and profit organisation engaged in human rights Development (FORUM-ASIA) works to documentation, legal research and advocacy promote and protect human rights, in Sri Lanka. Our aim is to use rights-based including the right to development, strategies in research, documentation and through collaboration and cooperation advocacy in order to promote and protect among human rights organisations and human rights, enhance public accountability defenders in Asia and beyond. and respect for the rule of law. Address : Address : 3, Kynsey Terrace, Colombo 8, S.P.D Building 3rd Floor, Sri Lanka 79/2 Krungthonburi Road, Tel : +94 11 2684845 Khlong Ton Sai, +94 11 2691228 Khlong San Bangkok, Fax : +94 11 2686843 10600 Thailand Web : lawandsocietytrust.org Tel : +66 (0)2 1082643-45 Email : [email protected] Fax : +66 (0)2 1082646 Facebook : www.fb.me/lstlanka Web : www.forum-asia.org Twitter : @lstlanka E-mail : [email protected] Any responses to this publication are welcome and may be communicated to either organisation via email or post. The opinions expressed in this publication are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. Acknowledgements: Law & Society Trust and FORUM-ASIA would like to thank Amila Jayamaha for editing the chapters, Smriti Daniel for proofreading the publication and Dilhara Pathirana for coordinating the editorial process. The cover was designed by Chanuka Wijayasinghe, who is a designer based in Colombo, Sri Lanka. DISCLAIMER: The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of LST and FORUM-ASIA and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • 21.02.2014 (223-10) Final (?For Web)
    223 වන කාණ්ඩය - 10 වන කලාපය 2014 ෙපබරවාරි 21වන සිකුරාදා ெதாகுதி 223 - இல. 10 2014 ெபப்வாி 21, ெவள்ளிக்கிழைம Volume 223 - No. 10 Friday, 21st February, 2014 පාලෙනත වාද (හැනසා) பாராமன்ற விவாதங்கள் (ஹன்சாட்) PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) ල වාතාව அதிகார அறிக்ைக OFFICIAL REPORT (අෙශෝධිත පිටපත /பிைழ தித்தப்படாத /Uncorrected) අන්තර්ගත පධාන කරුණු නිෙව්දන: කථානායකතුමාෙග් සහතිකය පශනවලට් වාචික පිළිතුරු ෙපෞද්ගලිකව දැනුම් දීෙමන් ඇසූ පශනය් : අද්විතීය ෙයෝජනා සහ අ නෙප්ක්ෂිත ෙයෝජනා ආශිත වාපෘති අධිකරණ හා නීති ක්ෙෂේතෙය් මතු වී තිෙබන ගැටලු ෙශෝක පකාශය : ගරු ෙෆස්ටස් ෙපෙර්රා මහතා பிரதான உள்ளடக்கம் அறிவிப்கள்: சபாநாயகர சான்ைர வினாக்கக்கு வாய்ல விைடகள் தனி அறிவித்தல்ல வினா: தன்னிைலயான மற்ம் ேவண்டப்ெபறாத ன்ெமாழிகள்சார் கத்திட்டங்கள் நீதி மற்ம் சட்டத்ைறயில் எந்ள்ள பிரச்சிைனகள் அதாபத் தீர்மானம் : மாண்மிகு ெபஸ்டஸ் ெபேரரா PRINCIPAL CONTENTS ANNOUNCEMENTS: Speaker’s Certificate ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS QUESTION BY PRIVATE NOTICE: Projects on Stand-Alone Proposals and Unsolicited Proposals Problems arisen in Judicial and Legal Fields VOTE OF CONDOLENCE: Hon. Festus Perera 1133 1134 පාර්ලිෙම්න්තුව පශ්නවලට වාචික පිළිතුරු பாராமன்றம் வினாக்கக்கு வாய்ல விைடகள் ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS PARLIAMENT —————–—- ෙකොළඹ මහ නගර සභාව : හිඟ වරිපනම් බදු 2014 ෙපබරවාරි 21වන සිකුරාදා ெகாம் மாநகர சைப : ஆதன வாி நிைவ 2014 ெபப்வாி 21, ெவள்ளிக்கிழைம COLOMBO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL: OUTSTANDING Friday, 21st February, 2014 ASSESSMENT TAX —————————————- 3267/’12 අ.භා.1.30ට පාර්ලිෙම්න්තුව රැස ් විය.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Performance Report and Accounts of the Ministry of Internal
    Expectation … The choices we make today will define the future However as stated in the previous year signs and hints to how scope and the functions Home Affairs Division would be strengthened, are clearly visible. With the expansion of novel technology and the advent of new concepts the Division would be in a better position to achieve its intended targets. Accordingly Home Affairs Division fully focused on such future. We are truly depended on such environment. Home Affairs Division I Content Division Vision, Mission …………..…....01 North Central Province ...............56-57 Anuradhapura District ...........................58 Former Ministers of Home Affairs Polonnaruwa District ............................59 Division…………………………...…….....02 Uva Province ................................60-61 Message from the president and message Badulla District ……………...................62 from the prim minister …………...………03 Monaragala District ………...................63 Message of Minister ………..…….…......04 Sabaragamuwa Province …….64-65 Ratnapura District ………………….......66 Message Of deputy Minister, Secretary Kegalle District ……………………........67 and State Secretary ………………….....05 Infrastructure Development in District Scope of Division ……………….......06-11 Secretariats and Divisional Secretariats ………………………………………....…68 Significance of year 2018 ……...…..12-19 Progress of Recurrent and Capital Significance of Registrar General Expenditure as at 31.12.2018 …... 69-71 Department …………….………..…...20-23 Nilamehewara President‟s People Significance of District and
    [Show full text]
  • Pastor General Meets Royalty, State Officials in Last Leg of Trip HWA
    OF THE WO~LDWIDE CHURCH OF GOD _V_O_L_._Xl_I~,_N_O_._2_4 ______________________________~P~ASADENA,CALIFORNIA DEC. 24,1984 Pastor general meets royalty, state officials in last leg of trip By Aaron K. Dean The minister. who also oversees Me. Armstrong returned the BURBANK, Calif. - Touching the Mahaweli River dam project, toast and spoke for 30 minutes on down aboard the Church's G-II I jet, explained underlying reasons for the causes of troubles in Sri Lanka Pastor General Herbert W. Arm­ the continuing social unrest and ter­ and the world at large. strong arrived at the airport here rorism in Sri Lanka. Dec. 2 from Tokyo, Japan, complet­ Cultural and racial friction Press conference ing his five-week tOUf of the Orient between Tamils. the minority race At 5 p.m. the group returned to and Asia. (18 percent of the population who the banquet room for a press confer­ were brought from India during the ence with Sri lankan journalists. Aaron K. Dean, a pastor-rank days of the British Empire), and The journalists asked Mr. Arm­ minister, is personal aide to Sinhalese (74 percent of the pOpula­ strong about the terrorism problem Pastor General Herbert W. tion) periodically erupts into open and how Mr. Armstrong could Armstrong. violence. (Moors make up the bring lasting peace to the region. remainder of the population.) Mr. A rmstrong ex.plained: "I During the last 13 days of his trip The majority of the problem, the can't bring peace. Peace comes from (see Nov. 26 and Dec. 10 issues of group was told, centers on agroupof living the way of give.
    [Show full text]
  • RESULTS of the PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - 20/07/1960 No of No of Total No
    RESULTS OF THE PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - 20/07/1960 No of No of Total No. of Votes No of No. and Name of Electoral District Name of the Elected Candidate Symbol allotted Votes Votes Polled including Registered Polled rejected rejected Electors 1 Colombo North V.A. Sugathadasa Elephant 11,507 92 22,962 29,434 Vivienne Goonewardene(Mrs) Key 11,363 2 Colombo Central Sir Razik Fareed Hand 45,342 3,488 179,584 74,922 Pieter Keuneman Star 38,663 M.C. M. Kaleel Eye 37,486 R. Premadasa Elephant 35,035 P.B. Thampoe Key 16,406 M.S. Themis Cart Wheel 3,164 3 Borella W. Danister de Silva Hand 11,409 128 20,227 28,423 R.B. Lenora Elephant 8,690 4 Colombo South J.R. Jayewardene Chair 25,814 1,056 61,416 42,367 Bernard Soysa Key 23,914 Edmund Samarawickrema Elephant 5,765 George Jayasuriya Butterfly 3,750 Vijaya Gunaratne Cart Wheel 1,022 N. Alfred de Fonseka Ladder 95 5 Wattala D. Shelton Jayasinghe Elephant 11,633 68 23,611 30,201 A.D.J.L.Leo Hand 11,529 W.S. Perera Cart Wheel 287 D.J. Weerackody Butterfly 94 6 Negombo T. Quintin Fernando Elephant 14,469 124 21,701 32,569 M.B. Kurera Hand 7,108 7 Katana Wijayapala Mendis Elephant 10,846 121 21,769 31,019 Hector Fernando Key 10,802 RESULTS OF THE PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - 20/07/1960 No of No of Total No. of Votes No of No. and Name of Electoral District Name of the Elected Candidate Symbol allotted Votes Votes Polled including Registered Polled rejected rejected Electors 8 Divulapitiya Lakshman Jayakody Hand 15,049 94 25,846 32,755 Percy Jayakody Elephant 10,310 Amarapala Ariyatillake Eye 211 D.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Ministers of the Ministry
    Period Ministry Minister 1931 - 1942 Ministry of Home Affairs Sir Don Baron Jayathilaka 1942 - 1946 Ministry of Home Affairs Hon. Arunachalam Mahadeva 1946 - 1947 Ministry of Home Affairs Sir Oliver Gunathilake 1947 - 1956 Ministry of Home Affairs Hon. A. A. Rathnayake 1956 - 1959 Ministry of Home Affairs Hon. A.P. Jayasuriya 26th September 1959 – 8th December 1959 Ministry of Home Affairs Hon. T.B. Ilangarathne 23rd March 1960 - July 1960 Ministry of Home Affairs and Rural Development Hon. M.C.M. Kaleel 23rd July 1960 - 1965 Ministry of Industry, Home Affairs and Cultural Affairs Hon. Maithreepala Senanayake March 1965 - 1970 Ministry of Industry, Home Affairs and Cultural Affairs Hon. Vijayananda Dahanayake 31st May 1970 – July 1977 Ministry of Industry, Home Affairs and Cultural Affairs Hon. Feelix Dias Bandaranayake 23rd July 1977 - February 1980 Ministry of Industry, Home Affairs and Cultural Affairs Hon. Montegu Jayawickrama 1980 - 1990 Ministry of Home Affairs Hon. K.W. Devanayagam 1990 - 1994 Ministry of Public Administration, Provincial Councils Hon. Festus Perera and Home Affairs 1994 – November 1994 Ministry of Public Administration and Plantation Hon. Rathnasiri Wickramanayake Industries 1994 – October 2000 Ministry of Home Affairs, Local Government and Hon. Amarasiri Dodangoda Cooperative October 2000 – December 2001 Ministry of Public Administration, Home Affairs and Hon. Richard Pathirana Administrative Reforms December 2001 – April 2004 Ministry of Home Affairs, Provincial Councils and Local Hon. Allic Aluvihare Government April 2004 - November 2005 Ministry of Home Affairs, Provincial Councils and Local Hon. Amarasiri Dodangoda Government November 2005 – January 2007 Ministry of Public Administration and Home Affairs Hon. Sarath Amunugama January 2007 - January 2009 Ministry of Public Administration and Home Affairs Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament in a Presidential System
    2 Parliament in a Presidential System Reeza Hameed The most significant innovation introduced by the 1978 Constitution is that of the President who does not owe his office either to the Prime Minister or the legislature but is elected directly by the people for a fixed term. It represents a radical departure from the pre-1978 post-independence constitutions, which were designed adopting the Westminster model having a popularly elected legislature as its dominant characteristic, and the head of the executive acting as a ceremonial figure with no real power to exercise. This chapter will focus on the transformation of the Parliament as it functioned within the Westminster system to that of the Presidential system and examine Parliament’s position and role within the latter system. The Soulbury Constitution The Order-in-Council of 1946, otherwise known as the Soulbury Constitution, the first post-independence constitution, was the culmination of the process of constitutional reform initiated by the British colonial government with a view to transferring power to the Ceylonese. In 1943, His Majesty’s Government issued a Declaration1 on the question of constitutional reform in the island and invited the Ceylonese Ministers to draft a constitutional scheme for consideration by the British Government. The Soulbury Commission which was subsequently appointed to visit the island and report on constitutional reform gave its 1 The Declaration of 1943 in The Report of the Commission on Constitutional Reform, Cmnd.7667 (1945) (HMSO) (hereafter “The Soulbury Commission Report”): para.83. The Declaration set out the principles to which the proposed constitution of Ceylon was expected to fully conform.
    [Show full text]
  • Jkpo;J; Njrpa Mtzr; Rtbfs;
    Pirapaharan Chapter 35<br>Tamil Blood Boils - Sangam.org Page 1 of 7 www.tamilarangam.net Sangam.org - Ilankai Tamil Sangam Association of Tamils of Sri Lanka in the USA Active Home Page Previous Version Archive Original Version Home Page Pirapaharan Chapter 35 Tamil Blood Boils by T. Sabaratnam; published March 31, 2004 35: Tamil Blood Boils Eyewitness Account I was in Trincomalee on 27 November 1982 with Daily News presidential reporter Norton Weerasinghe and photographer Sena Vithanagama to cover the foundation-laying function of the Mitsui Cement Factory the next morning. We met Trincomalee Member of Parliament Rajavarothayam Sampanthan at his home on 28 November morning to arrange the use of his telephone to send the report of the event to the Daily News. Obtaining telephone calls from provincial towns was difficult those days and only a few top government officials, police, commanding officers of armed services and parliamentarians enjoyed a direct dialing facility. Others had to go through the telephone exchange, which meant several hours of waiting. Peter Balasooriya of The Sunday Island had made arrangements with the Trincomalee Government Agent, Jayatissa Bandaragoda, one of his important contacts, thus forcing us to make an alternative arrangement. Sampanthan had just returned from a meeting with President Jayewardene who had come to lay the foundation stone when we met him. “I thanked him for canceling the Cadju Plantation Project and briefed him about a plot to eject the poor Indian Tamils settled by Gandhyam in Vavuniya, Trincomalee and Batticoloa. The President was very accommodative,” he said. Sampanthan also told us his worry about moves by Cyril Mathew and Gamini Dissanayake to convert Trincomalee into a Sinhala-majority province.
    [Show full text]
  • Visuvalingam and Others V. Liyanage and Others 311
    sc Visuvalingam and Others v. Liyanage and Others 311 VISUVALINGAM AND OTHERS v. LIYANAGE AND OTHERS SUPREME COURT WANASUNDERA. J.. RATWATTE. J.. SOZA. J.. RANASINGHE. J. AND RODRIGO. J. S.Cf APPLICATIONS NOS. 47/83. 53/83 And 61/8 3 24. 25. 26. 27. 28 AND 31 OCTOBER 1983 AND 1.2. 3, 7. 8 AND 9 NOVEMBER 1 983. Fundamental Rights — Emergency Regulations (Miscellaneous Provisions and Powers) under Public Security Ordinance — Prohibition by Competent Authority to print, publish and distribute newspaper called Saturday Review — Closure of press — Violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14(1) (a), (c) and (g) and 12( 1) and (2) of the Constitution — Locus standi of a company. New Era Publications Ltd., a company along with its shareholders and directors in case No. 4 7 /8 3 complained of infringement of their fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression including publication set out in Article 14(1 )(a) and to the right of freedom to engage by themselves or in association with others in any lawful occupation, profession, trade, business or enterprises set out in Article 14(1)(g). The 1st to 6 petitioners are citizens of Sri Lanka and are seeking to vindicate their own fundamental rights as citizens and have merely utilised the institution of a company (7th petitioner) to exercise their fundamental right of freedom of speech including publication (Article 14(1 )(a) and the fundamental right of freedom to engage with one another in the newspapers business (Article 14(1 ){g). In case No. 53/8 3 and 6 3 /8 the same petitioners complain of the infringement of their fundamental rights guaranteed to them under Articles 14( 1 )(a).
    [Show full text]