Aerospace Medicine. and Biology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Technology of Articulated Transit Buses Transportation 6
-MA-06-01 20-82-4 DEPARTMENT of transportation HE SC-UMTA-82-17 1 8. b .\37 JUL 1983 no. DOT- LIBRARY TSC- J :aT \- 8 ?- Technology of U.S. Department of Transportation Articulated Transit Buses Urban Mass Transportation Administration Office of Technical Assistance Prepared by: Office of Bus and Paratransit Systems Transportation Systems Center Washington DC 20590 Urban Systems Division October 1982 Final Report NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse prod- 1 ucts or manufacturers . Trade or manufacturers nam&s appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. 4 v 3 A2>7 ?? 7 - c c AST* Technical Report Page V ST‘ (* Documentation 1 . Report No. 2. Government A ccession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UMTA-MA-06-0 120-82- 4. Title and Subti tie ~6. Report Date October 1982 DEPARTMENT OF I TECHNOLOGY OF ARTICULATED TRANSIT BUSES TRANSPORTATION 6. Performing Organization Code TSC/DTS-6 j JUL 1983 8 . Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author's) DOT-TSC-UMTA-82-17 Richard G. Gundersen | t |kh a R 9. Performing Organization Name and Address jjo. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) U.S. Department of Transportation UM262/R2653 Research and Special Programs Administration 11. Contract or Grant No. Transportation Systems Center Cambridge MA 02142 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. -
Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: a National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners
The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: A National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners Author(s): Neal Miller Document No.: 197066 Date Received: October 24, 2002 Award Number: 97-WT-VX-0007 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Institute for Law and Justice 1018 Duke Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Phone: 703-684-5300 Fax: 703-739-5533 i http://www. ilj .org -- PROPERTY OF National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). t'Y- Box 6000 Rockville, MD 20849-6000 fl-- Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: A 0 National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners Neal Miller October 2001 Prepared under a grant from the National Institute of Justice to the Institute for Law and Justice (ILJ), grant no. 97-WT-VX-0007 Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Justice or ILJ. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. -
Recent History of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in California: the Success in Los Angeles and the Struggle in the Bay Area by David Kan
A Brief History of Transit in California © 2015 California Transit Association All Rights Reserved. Ten student papers are reprinted with the permission of the students and the students retain the copyrights to their articles included in this publication. Table of Contents Introduction . 5 Chapter 1: California and National Transit History . 7 Chapter 2: The Role of Federal Government in Transit . 25 1 2 Chapter 3: California State Funding for Transit . 37 4 Chapter 4: Linkages Between Urban Development and Transit . 47 5 Chapter 5: The Growing Importance of Social and Environmental Considerations in Providing Transit Service . 53 6 Chapter 6: Institutional Arrangements for Transit Provision . 59 3 7 Chapter 7: The Next Fifty Years: What Transit Might Look Like in the Future . 63 Appendix A: Timeline . 69 Appendix B: Student Papers . 77 Proposition 13 and AC Transit: No Going Back By Michael Alston . 79 Walk-and-Ride: Improving the Pedestrian Experience to Transit By Carline Au . 93 So Many Agencies, So Little Coordination: A Brief History of the Evolution of Public Transit Agencies and the Beginnings of a Regional Network in the Bay Area By Sara K . Barz . 101 Recent Trends in Transit Worker Wages and Benefits By Cheng Ding . 109 Recent History of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in California: The Success in Los Angeles and the Struggle in the Bay Area By David Kan . 117 Ridesharing: A Revisit to American Jitneys a Century Later By Janice Park . 133 Big Transit in Little Berkeley: Bay Area Rail Transit History, As Told By Two Berkeley Intersections By Samuel Siegel . 141 The Rapid Transit Solutions That Never Were: A Historical Look at Rail Rapid Transit Proposals in Los Angeles By Adam Stocker . -
Memo#NJC 0'1-359 December6,200'1
!r A C TRANSITDISTRICT Memo#NJC0'1-359 FromOffice of Ward5 Director December6,200'1 Dr.Nancy Jewell Cross sContract for Eutopean Buses and RFP' Agenda llem 4a. at Board Meeting 12113101 DireciorNancy Jewell Cross asks the Boardto adoptthe Resoluiionoi whichform followsas is,or as it maybe amendedagreeably to me as a resultof diseussion. Justificationfor reconsiderationis included in the resoluiion. ln addiiionto the formfor Resolution,I adopt here for allpurposes Exhibits A throughG following.The standardis for the Boardto havedocumentation sufficient for informeddecision. A week beforepublic record requests are accommodated and ihe Boardis askedio approve expending$61 ,400 400 in State/LocilFunds, the Board lacks specifics ot uniiprice, sourceor {undsfor largefreight charges for delivery,impaci on bus operationsby useof State/loealtunds, whether the kindsof vehiclesfrom a sole sourceis optirnalio service needsand bestpractices in fleetcornposition in bodyand powering, impacts in national and other dimensionsof usingState/Local funds at cost to operalionsof A C Transitand millionsinvested in foreign economies and freight costs contrary io naiionalpolicy and economiccrisis. Documentationis sketchy. Lackof iimelyinformaiion desired by board membershas been sought from the GeneralManager time and again, wiihoui avail. A-GM Merno01-304 Report on the Costof Transporting People on a StandardBus vs. A Van. Thisis an exampleof the inadequaiedocumentation on subjectinvolved in Boarddecisiong on busprocurement, 2 pages. B-Note: Nancyfrom Rose 1216/01. This illustrates the unavailabilityof information importantfor informeddecision on termsbf the contract,long afterthe RFP. C-Comparisonof 1984Public Transit Costs for FourVehicle Types, Congressional BudgetOffice 1986, Thisillustrates the kind of informationneeded by board . membersand available by staffresearch disclosed in documentsprior to board calendaringin the subjectmatter. -
RECORDS Trartsfer LIST COURT of APPEAL {1)40301 PAGE 1 STD 71 FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT (2)14/2016 {3}LIST ~4 ~4)SACRAMENTO 303 ZND ST
RECORDS TRArTSFER LIST COURT OF APPEAL {1)40301 PAGE 1 STD 71 FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT (2)14/2016 {3}LIST ~4 ~4)SACRAMENTO 303 ZND ST. S.TOWER SUITE 6089 {5)NON-CONFIDENTAL SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 (8)CA-1 '~.0)BOX {11)DESCRIPTION OF RECORDS (12)SRC 1 Aa377Od 1 2 ~O377d0 AO3998Q Afl4O7OO 2 3 A~~I57O 3 4 ~~4~730 AO408nO X041210 A0~15~fl 4 5 AO~I71~ AO4183O Afl~186O ~ 6 A~4187O AO4214~ A0~218O A~4223O 6 7 AO4226O AO4232O 7 8 A~425I0 AO4266a X042690 8 9 A0~27~O ~04276~ 9 ~, ~t3 ~{~2'83J ~fl4285C3 .C~~~~ t34289t~ ~-- + ~Q ?~ ~fl~~-15~ A.{}~31'7t} ~C}~4325~ ~~3432~s0 ~~ ~~~."_.-~.. A. ,~_. ~:i.i'~~..J .. o _. _. .J _. II;a L' -_ s _ '.~; :::fin.. €4, 1~ ~7 ^'~VV~ fJt"ar 'se — ~d.~ ~ ,., __ . RECORDS TRANSFER LIST COURT OF APPEAL {1)40301 PAGE 2 STD 7I FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT (2)10/2016 {3)LIST 74 r(4)SACRAMENTO 3a3 2ND ST. S.TOWER SUITE 6089 (5)NON-CONFIDENT~L SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 (8)CA-1 ~ld)BOX (11)DESCRiPTiON ~F RECORDS {12)SRC 13 A~4347fl AO43~9~ A~43b4O AO43~~0 Z3 AO4378O Afl4394O AO44O4O 14 AO4~18O Z104422O ~tJ~?42~0 AO4435d 14 ~~443?t3 A.O4438O A~~4~4i~ 15 AO4446Q ~fl~45fl~ A0~45Ifl AO445'~a 15 At14~58(7 AO4488O 16 AC~44910 AO4527~ AO453?~ A~45~2Q 16 3.7 A{~4544O A.O~455OC3 At74574O At745~?0 1~ AO4582Q AQ4592Q AO4593i~ AC34b{39O 18 A~?45i6O AO4635fl A0~637C7 Afl4638O 18 Af~4651O AO4656O AO4664O AO4685O AQ4688{~ ~,fl47OOt3 P,O47~8~ ~fl~72C3t9 Afl4721O A0~7234 19 A0~4724O A~4725O ~0~73{30 Afl4731O ~.9 AO4732O Afl47340 Z(~ ~.0~735(3 ~~3~7~2fl .O47~b~3 ~{3~7~8Q ~fl t~4?90 ~.0~7~ ifl ~C3~758U ~~3~'759~ :Q476CD~1 23. -
Estimation of Transit Supply Parameters
UMTA-MA-09-901 5-85-01 Transit Project tment oflransportation Planning Guidance Urban Mass Transportation Administration Estimation of T ransit Supply Parameters Prepared by: Transportation Systems Center October 1984 UMTA Capital Grants and Technical Assistance Programs NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. 1 ft* .ftb 1 r\o- U MTA-MA-09-90 1 5-85-0 DOT'' TU' UMT*~ y TRANSIT PROJECT PLANNING GUIDANCE ESTIMATION OF TRANSIT SUPPLY PARAMETERS Michael Jacobs, Robert E. Skinner, and Andrew C. Lemer f October 1984 prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation Transportation Systems Center Office of Systems Assessment for the U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Administration Office of Technical Assistance and the Office of Grants Management Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Aec< No. 3. Recipient' t Catalog No. UMTA-MA-09-901 5-85-01 4. Title and Subtitle S. Report Date TRANSIT PROJECT PLANNING GUIDANCE: ESTIMATION OF October 1984 TRANSIT SUPPLY PARAMETERS 6. Performing Orgoni lotion Code DTS-64 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author' s) Michael Jacobs, Robert E. Skinner*, & Andrew C. Lemer** DQT-TSC-UMTA-84-33 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) U.S. Department of Transportation UM532, R5622 Research and Special Programs Administration 11. -
Rochester Responds
Rochester Review Rochester FROM NIH TO NOBELIST PANDEMIC HISTORIAN VISIONARY WOMEN Harvey Alter ’56, ’60M What does 1918 teach Celebrating the pioneering (MD) receives Nobel Prize. about 2020? women who shaped our world. UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER /FALL 2020 FALL 2020FALL UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER Rochester Responds National clinical trials experts Angela Branche and Ann Falsey are among the many members of the University community who joined forces to fight COVID-19. , Let s do this. It’s about everyone pitching in. It’s about helping our students and graduates find internships and jobs. It’s about promoting equity and access. And it’s about communicating how important our network of alumni, volunteers, and friends is to our future. Will you join us? Together for Rochester a one-year campaign to make life better rochester.edu/together #TogetherForRochester Features FALL 2020 50 Rochester Responds diseases, Rochester is a crossroads 22 for coronavirus vaccine trials, a place As the COVID-19 pandemic sweeps 22 where interdisciplinary research meets through the country, members of the innovative applications. By Lindsey Valich University community take on new roles and quickly revamp old processes— always with compassion and character. 48 ‘Always Tell the We highlight a small sample of those Truth’ efforts. Historian John Barry ’69 (MA), who wrote the book on the 1918 flu pandemic, The Road to a offers lessons for 2020 and beyond. 42 Interview by Kathleen McGarvey Vaccine May Lead to Rochester 50 Visionary Women With a distinguished record in of Rochester vaccine technology and infectious As the nation celebrates the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage, the University celebrates women who had ON THE COVER: Angela Branche and Ann their roots in Rochester (above)—and Falsey, nationally recognized clinical trial who made an impact worldwide. -
Annual Report Fy20
DIVISION OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE ANNUAL REPORT FY20 DIVISION OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Chief 3 Faculty Listing 4 Clinical Activities 11 Quality Improvement Initiatives 16 Clinical Locations 22 Research Activities 24 Grants and Contracts Awarded 89 Teaching Activities 105 One-Year Bibliography 116 Acknowledgments 133 DIVISION OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE ur missions are to maintain excellence in patient Ocare, to provide innovations in the education and Jane Liebschutz, MD, MPH Chief training of future physicians and clinical scientists, and to advance health care and population health through Even as the COVID-19 pandemic has been taking a disproportionate toll research and discovery. on communities of color, turmoil The Division of General Internal Medicine (DGIM) continues has rippled across the country in its success in clinical care, research, teaching, and adminis- the wake of George Floyd’s death by tration even as the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the last police in Minnesota. quarter of the fiscal year. In fact, the Division very success- In response, the DGIM has wholeheartedly fully pivoted all three realms—clinical care, teaching, and signed on as partners in the fight for social justice, committed to naming racism and research—in response to the pandemic. Our outpatient ef- systemic oppression where it exists and forts quickly pivoted to telemedicine, which we embraced speaking out in solidarity with our black col- by rapidly growing video visit volume from 5 a week to leagues, students, patients, neighbors and more than 300 a week. Video visits ensured patients still friends.