News from Library of Congress: 2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
From UKMARC to MARC 21: a Guide to the Differences
Changing the record A concise guide to the differences between the UKMARC and MARC 21 bibliographic formats By R.W. Hill Bibliographic research officer, British Library The British Library Bibliographic Policy & Liaison National Bibliographic Service Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire LS23 7BQ ©The British Library 2002 1 Contents Introduction 4 1 MARC 21 and UKMARC: an overview 1.1 A side-by-side comparison 5 1.2 MARC standards 6 1.3 Related formats 6 1.4 A note on the background 6 2 Structure and components of the MARC record 2.1 Fields 7 2.2 Indicators 7 2.3 Subfields 7 2.4 Control subfields 8 2.5 Levels 8 2.6 Character set 8 2.7 Record leader and directory 8 A note on the method of comparison 10 3 Name headings 3.1 Personal name headings 11 3.2 Corporate name headings 12 3.3 Meeting/conference name headings 12 4 Title information 4.1 Uniform titles 13 4.2 Collective titles 14 4.3 Title and statement of responsibility 14 4.4 Part titles 14 4.5 Key titles 16 4.6 Variant and related titles 16 5 Edition and imprint 5.1 Edition statement 17 5.2 Cartographic mathematical data 17 5.3 Computer file characteristics 17 5.4 Publication, distribution and manufacture 17 5.5 Projected publication date 18 6 Physical description and related details 6.1 Physical description 19 6.2 Price and availability 19 6.3 Sequential designation of serials 19 6.4 Other descriptive fields 19 7 Series statements 7.1 Series statements in title added entry form 20 7.2 Series statements not in title added entry form 20 8 Notes 8.1 Principles for defining notes 21 8.2 -
Music for the People: the Folk Music Revival
MUSIC FOR THE PEOPLE: THE FOLK MUSIC REVIVAL AND AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1930-1970 By Rachel Clare Donaldson Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History May, 2011 Nashville, Tennessee Approved Professor Gary Gerstle Professor Sarah Igo Professor David Carlton Professor Larry Isaac Professor Ronald D. Cohen Copyright© 2011 by Rachel Clare Donaldson All Rights Reserved For Mary, Laura, Gertrude, Elizabeth And Domenica ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would not have been able to complete this dissertation had not been for the support of many people. Historians David Carlton, Thomas Schwartz, William Caferro, and Yoshikuni Igarashi have helped me to grow academically since my first year of graduate school. From the beginning of my research through the final edits, Katherine Crawford and Sarah Igo have provided constant intellectual and professional support. Gary Gerstle has guided every stage of this project; the time and effort he devoted to reading and editing numerous drafts and his encouragement has made the project what it is today. Through his work and friendship, Ronald Cohen has been an inspiration. The intellectual and emotional help that he provided over dinners, phone calls, and email exchanges have been invaluable. I greatly appreciate Larry Isaac and Holly McCammon for their help with the sociological work in this project. I also thank Jane Anderson, Brenda Hummel, and Heidi Welch for all their help and patience over the years. I thank the staffs at the Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage, the Kentucky Library and Museum, the Archives at the University of Indiana, and the American Folklife Center at the Library of Congress (particularly Todd Harvey) for their research assistance. -
News from the Library of Congress: MOUG/MLA 2007
NEWS FROM THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS MOUG/MLA 2007 Special Materials Cataloging Division Music Division Cataloging Policy and Support Office American Folklife Center General Library News Copyright Office Office of Strategic Initiatives Compiled by Joe Bartl, MSR1, SMCD Feb. 26, 2007 SPECIAL MATERIALS CATALOGING DIVISION (SMCD) Top of the Document (Joe Bartl. MSR1, SMCD) CATALOGING ACCOMPLISHMENTS Bibliographic Production Arrearage Accomplishments Bibliographic Maintenance WORKFLOW SIMPLIFICATION Introduction CD Brief Workflow Leased Metadata (AMG) CD Sorter & CD Add OTHER INITIATIVES New Sound Recording Formats Guidelines Series and collected works (new treatment) CD Multivolume Project Choral Music Octavos Elimination of Book Backlog Card Catalogs Inventory Project Music Division Special Collections records added to Voyager OvOp Sound Recordings Popular Sheet Music Project NEW PROJECTS Ethnic Sound Recordings M1508 Sheet Music Secure Storage Facilities Telework ONGOING PROJECTS All Media Guide (AMG) Workflow Nijinska Collection SR Foreign Language Project COOPERATION/OUTREACH Advisory Groups International Groups LC Divisions LC Junior Fellows Music Division Reference Services Music Division Strategic Planning NACO/SACO Network Development and MARC Standards Office CATALOGING ACCOMPLISHMENTS Bibliographic production: New bibliographic records added to the database consisted of 3,517 scores, 16,561 sound recordings, and 2,730 books/ERs/Microforms. This totals 22,847 new bibliographic records added to the database. Arrearage accomplishments: A total of 35,395 items were removed from the arrearage as follows: CDs (33,984); LPs (348); 78s (38); 45s (125); 10” reels (224); and cassettes (676). Bibliographic maintenance and auxiliary statistics: 9,078 bibliographic records were modified. 7,577 authority records were added to the database and 3,607 authority records were modified. -
Descriptive Metadata Guidelines for RLG Cultural Materials I Many Thanks Also to These Individuals Who Reviewed the Final Draft of the Document
������������������������������� �������������������������� �������� ����������������������������������� ��������������������������������� ��������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������� � ���������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������ ����������������������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������� �� ���������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������� �������������������� ������������������� ���������������������������� ��� ���������������������������������������� ����������� ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to the members of the RLG Cultural Materials Alliance—Description Advisory Group for their participation in developing these guidelines: Ardie Bausenbach Library of Congress Karim Boughida Getty Research Institute Terry Catapano Columbia University Mary W. Elings Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Michael Fox Minnesota Historical Society Richard Rinehart Berkeley Art Museum & Pacific Film Archive University of California, Berkeley Elizabeth Shaw Aziza Technology Associates, LLC Neil Thomson Natural History Museum (UK) Layna White San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Günter Waibel RLG staff liaison Thanks also to RLG staff: Joan Aliprand Arnold Arcolio Ricky Erway Fae Hamilton Descriptive Metadata Guidelines for RLG Cultural Materials i Many -
DACS (Describing Archives: a Content Standard)
SAA-Approved Standard DE S CRI DESCRIBING B ARCHIVES ING ARCHIVE A CONTENT STANDARD SECOND EDITION DESCRIBING Revised and updated, Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS) facilitates S : consistent, appropriate, and self-explanatory description of archival materials and A CON creators of archival materials. This new edition reflects the growing convergence among archival, museum, and library standards; aligns DACS with the descriptive ARCHIVES standards developed and supported by the International Council on Archives; and TE A CONTENT STANDARD provides guidance on the creation of archival authority records. DACS can be applied N to all types of material at all levels of description, and the rules are designed for use by T S SECOND EDITION any type of descriptive output, including MARC 21, Encoded Archival Description TA (EAD), and Encoded Archival Context (EAC). N The second edition consists of two parts: “Describing Archival Materials” and DARD “Archival Authority Records.” Separate sections discuss levels of description and the importance of access points to the retrieval of descriptions. Appendices feature a list of companion standards and crosswalks to ISAD(G), ISAAR(CPF), MARC 21, EAD, S EAC, and Resource Description and Access (RDA). Also included is an index. ECON D E D ITION BROWSE ARCHIVES TITLES AT WWW.ARCHIVISTS.ORG/CATALOG D E S C R I B I N G ARCHIVES ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ A CONTENT STANDARD SECOND EDITION Chicago THE SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS www.archivists.org © 2013 by the Society of American Archivists All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Describing Archives: A Content Standard, Second Edition (DACS) was officially adopted as a standard by the Council of the Society of American Archivists in January 2013, following review by the SAA Standards Committee, its Technical Subcommittee for Describing Archives: A Content Standard, and the general archival community. -
David Lewiston
FEATURE Dalhousie, Northern India, 1972: Lewiston at Tashi Jong Using hand-held EV RE50s – the monastery, 1998. informant holds one of the mics in place, freeing up Lewiston’s “ …what could be left hand for operating the recorder. better than travelling to incredible places, meeting amazing musicians, and recording them?” He’s spent the last 40 years With a career spanning 40 years of recording that had evolved with little or no Western attitude and create the impression that what and releasing the music of other cultures, influence. His earliest Balinese and Tibetan you’re doing is simple and no big deal. Also, DAVID LEWISTON recording in Indonesia, David Lewiston could be described as the releases provided a timely soundtrack for a rather than hiding behind the musicians, Morocco, Peru, India, Mexico, father of world music. His pioneering field Western world that was dabbling in Eastern you want to be among them, expressing recordings of Balinese music from the 1960s philosophies, transcendental meditation and your pleasure at the music. This encourages The father of world music Istanbul, Nepal, Georgia, gave many Westerners their first taste of the other consciousness-altering endeavours. them to give a better performance. If a take Pakistan and more. He’s music of other cultures. No discussion of Lewiston would be complete is unsatisfactory, just keep going, and tell the recorded everything from But what makes Lewiston worthy of such a without acknowledging the contributions of musicians their music is really great. Then, later on in the session, tell them you really Balinese gamelan to Tibetan lofty title (and one which he would probably the late Teresa ‘Tracey’ Sterne, the visionary dismiss as ‘pretentious’)? Field recording head of Nonesuch Records who saw the enjoyed the piece that was poorly recorded and monks. -
Åpopulaty Musics and Globalization
}ÅPopulatY Musics and Globalization Foreign Music is where all the hipsters are. —Stanley Goman. Head of Retail Operations. Tower Records. 1995 1 HASN'T WOR1.n MUSIC.BF.FN AROUND FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS? One of the most notable trends in the music industry since the 1980shas been the rise in popularity of new music genres: world music, world beat, world fusion; in Germany, Weltbeat and Weltmusik2; in other parts of the world, ethnopop, Afropop, Afrobeat. Offshoots of these genres include: tribal, techno-tribal, and cybertribal, as well as ambient, trance, and new age. All of these categories overlap to some degree and with other categories I haven't men- tioned. In 1988, Tower Records' international buyer told Newsweekthat his sec- tion was "definitely the fastest growing part of the store," more than tripling in the previous three years. 3 By 1991 the market share of world music was equal to clas- sical music and jazz,4 two very small categories (accordingto the Recording Industry Association of America, in 1995, the market share of classical music was writing).5 2.9% and for jazz, 3.0%; they had no category for world music as of this sales are of "foreign A report in Forbes says that only about 2% of Tower Records' music."6 ofworld music is grow- Two percent isn't much, but the visibility (audibility?) Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan sang a ing fast. For example, the Pakistani Qawwali singer to Tim Robbins'sfilm Dead duet with Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam for the soundtrack 2 Global Pop Alan IValking, which raised Khan's fame to the extent that he was recently signed by Rick Rubin's Atnerican Recordings, an eclectic label that records, among 0th. -
RDA and MARC 21 Development Report to EURIG 2020 RDA Satellite Meeting, 15Th September, 2020
RDA and MARC 21 Development Report to EURIG 2020 RDA Satellite meeting, 15th September, 2020 Thurstan Young, British Library Overview • MARC 21 Background • MARC 21 Mappings in RDA Toolkit • MARC RDA Working Group www.bl.uk 2 MARC 21 Background (What is it?) • Machine Readable Cataloging 21 • Set of digital formats for the description of items catalogued by the library community • International standard for the transmission of bibliographic data • Widely used across North America, Europe and Australia www.bl.uk 3 MARC 21 Background (History) • Created in 1999 as a result of harmonizing USMARC and CAN/MARC • Adopted by the British Library in 2004 as a replacement to UKMARC www.bl.uk 4 MARC 21 Background (Structure / Content) • Field designations: three digit numeric code (from 001-999) identifies each field in a record • File structure: generally stored and transmitted as binary files, consisting of several MARC records • Content: encodes information about bibliographic resources and related entities www.bl.uk 5 MARC 21 Background (Formats) • Authority • Bibliographic • Holdings • Classification • Community www.bl.uk 6 MARC 21 Background (Development) • Discussion Papers, Proposals, Fast Track Changes • Updates issued twice a year • Sixty day embargo period to allow for implementation www.bl.uk 7 MARC 21 Background (Administration 1) • Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office • MARC Steering Group • MARC Advisory Committee www.bl.uk 8 MARC 21 Background (Administration 2) • MARC Steering Group • Library of Congress • Library and Archives Canada • British Library • Deutsche Nationalbibliothek www.bl.uk 9 MARC 21 Background (Administration 3) • MARC Advisory Committee • MARC Steering Group • Biblioteca Nacional de España • National Library of Australia • Various U.S. -
Tags for Identifying Languages File:///C:/W3/International/Draft-Langtags/Draft-Phillips-Lan
Tags for Identifying Languages file:///C:/w3/International/draft-langtags/draft-phillips-lan... Network Working Group A. Phillips, Ed. TOC Internet-Draft webMethods, Inc. Expires: October 7, 2004 M. Davis IBM April 8, 2004 Tags for Identifying Languages draft-phillips-langtags-02 Status of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on October 7, 2004. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document describes a language tag for use in cases where it is desired to indicate the language used in an information object, how to register values for use in this language tag, and a construct for matching such language tags, including user defined extensions for private interchange. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Language Tag 2.1 Syntax 2.2 Language Tag Sources 2.2.1 Pre-Existing RFC3066 Registrations 1 of 20 08/04/2004 11:03 Tags for Identifying Languages file:///C:/w3/International/draft-langtags/draft-phillips-lan.. -
General Introduction General Introduction
General Introduction General Introduction The MARC 21 formats are widely used standards for the representation and exchange of authority, bibliographic, classification, community information, and holdings data in machine-readable form. They consist of a family of five coordinated formats: MARC 21 Format for Authority Data; MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data; MARC 21 Format for Classification Data; MARC 21 Format for Community Information; and MARC 21 Format for Holdings Data. Each of these MARC formats is published separately online to provide detailed field descriptions, guidelines for applying the defined content designation (with examples), and identification of conventions to be used to insure input consistency. The MARC 21 Concise Formats provide in a single publication a quick reference guide to the content designators defined in the Bibliographic, Authority, and Holdings formats. It provides a concise description of each field, each character position of the fixed-length data element fields, and of the defined indicators in the variable data fields. Descriptions of subfield codes and coded values are given only when their names may not be sufficiently descriptive. Examples are included for each field. COMPONENTS OF A MARC 21 RECORD MARC format characteristics that are common to all of the formats are described in this general introduction. Information specific only to certain record types is given in the introduction to the MARC format to which it relates. A MARC record is composed of three elements: the record structure, the content designation, and the data content of the record. The record structure is an implementation of the American National Standard for Information Interchange (ANSI/NISO Z39.2) and its ISO equivalent ISO 2709. -
American Folklife Center & Veterans History Project Annual Report for FY2008
AMERICAN FOLKLIFE CENTER & VETERANS HISTORY PROJECT Library of Congress Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2008 (October 2007-September 2008) The American Folklife Center (AFC), which includes the Veterans History Project (VHP), had another productive year. Over a quarter million items were acquired by the AFC Archive, which is the country’s first national archive of traditional life, and one of the oldest and largest of such repositories in the world. About 240,000 items were processed, and thus made available to researchers at the Library and beyond. In addition, the Center continued to expand programming through symposia, concerts, and public lectures; by providing field school training to universities and international organizations; and by providing technical assistance to individuals and groups. AFC also continued to be a leader in international discussions concerning traditional culture and intellectual property, and the AFC director served as a member of US delegations to meetings convened by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), UNESCO, and the Organization of American States (OAS). Both AFC and VHP provided substantial services to Congress. The Veterans History Project (VHP) continued making major strides in its mission to collect and preserve the stories of our nation's veterans, receiving upwards of 100 collections a week and acquiring over 22,000 items. The maturation of the Project was reflected by its partnership with WETA-TV and PBS in their presentation of the Ken Burns film, The War, which told the story of World War II through the memories of individual veterans from four American towns. VHP also continued to foster solid working relationships with a wide variety of project participants nationwide, including the U.S. -
JONATHAN J. SAUCEDA 200 Columbia ● Highland Park, New Jersey [email protected] ● (848) 565-8650
JONATHAN J. SAUCEDA 200 Columbia ● Highland Park, New Jersey [email protected] ● (848) 565-8650 EDUCATION University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 2016 Doctor of Philosophy, Musicology Dissertation: “Opera in Argentine Society: Felipe Boero’s El Matrero” University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 2013 Master of Library Science Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas 2008 Master of Music, History and Literature Master of Music, Vocal Performance John Brown University, Siloam Springs, Arkansas 2004 Bachelor of Arts, Music with Emphases in Voice and Piano Bachelor of Arts, History EMPLOYMENT Music and Performing Arts Librarian 2013-present Interim Librarian for Spanish, Portuguese, Latinx, Latin 2017-present American and Caribbean Studies Rutgers University-New Brunswick REFERENCE AND INSTRUCTION Reference Team Leader, Douglass and Laurie Library o Supervise and assess reference services for the building o Set and evaluate information service goals o Schedule librarians and reference assistants on the reference desk Library Instruction o Teach on average eight information literacy sessions a semester in English 201 courses and courses related to liaison areas o Develop and maintain research guides for music, theater, dance, Spanish, Portuguese, Latinx, Latin American and Caribbean disciplines o Perform reference face-to-face, via email, chat, and through the “Ask a Librarian” system Introduction to Music Research (Instructor of Record) o In-person graduate-level class for music students discussing research resources, musical editions, methodologies, and readings in musicology, ethnomusicology and theory. Rockin’ Roots, Global Reach: The Story of Jersey’s Popular Music (Instructor of Record) Jonathan Sauceda [email protected] • (848) 932-9023 o In-person, undergraduate seminar contextualizing and digitizing New Jersey sheet music with final project.