DOCSLIB.ORG

Trumpet Fingering Chart, Page 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trumpet Fingering Chart, Page 1 ## G GFbbF E ED (F Concert) (E Concert) (Eb Concert) (D Concert) (Db/C# Concert) ∫œ w ‹œ b˙ #˙ ‹œ ˙ #˙ ∫œ ˙ bœ ‹œ b˙ #˙ ∫œ & & & & & Alt.: 1-3 Alt.: 1-2-3 Alt.: Alt.: 1-2 or 3 Alt.: 2-3 Possible: 1-2 or 3 Possible: 2-3, OPEN Possible: 1-3, 2 Possible: 1-2-3, 1 Possible: 1-2 or 3 b # b # D DC C B BA (C Concert) (B Concert) (Bb Concert) (A Concert) (Ab/G# Concert) w ∫œ ‹œ b˙ #˙ ‹œ w ∫œ #œ w bœ ‹œ b˙ #˙ ∫œ & & & & & Alt.: 1 Alt.: 1-2, 3 Alt.: 1 Alt.: 1-2 Alt.: 2-3 Possible: 1-3, 2-3 Possible: 1-2-3, 1-3 Possible: 2-3 Possible: 1-3 Possible: OPEN b# b# A AG G GF F (G Concert) (Gb/F# Concert) (F Concert) (E Concert) (Eb Concert) ∫œ ∫œ w ‹œ bw #w w ∫œ ‹œ b˙ #˙ ‹œ w #œ & & & & & USE 1st VALVE SLIDE USE 1st VALVE SLIDE Alt.: 3, 1-3 Alt.: 1-2-3 Alt.: 1-3 Alt.: 1-2-3 Alt.: Possible: 2 Possible: 1 Possible: 1-2 Possible: 2-3 Possible: 1-3 b # b # E ED D DC C (D Concert) (Db/C# Concert) (C Concert) (B Concert) (Bb Concert) w bœ ‹œ b˙ #˙ ∫œ w ∫œ b˙ & & & ‹œ & #˙ ‹œ & w ∫œ #œ Alt.: 1-2 or 3 Alt.: 2-3 Alt.: 1-3 Alt.: 1-2-3 Alt.: 2-3 Possible: 1-2-3 Possible: Possible: Possible: Possible: b B Trumpet Fingering Chart, Page 1. Copyright © 1999 by Andrew B. Spang. May NOT be reproduced without permission. All Rights Reserved. b # b# B BA A AG G (A Concert) (Ab/G# Concert) (G Concert) (Gb/F# Concert) (F Concert) bœ ∫œ & w ‹œ & bw #w & w ∫œ ‹œ & bw #w &w ∫œ ‹œ USE 1st VALVE SLIDE Alt.: Alt.: Alt.: 3 Alt.: Alt.: 1-3 Possible: 1-3 Possible: 1-2-3 Possible: Possible: Possible: b# b # GF F E ED D (E Concert) (Eb Concert) (D Concert) (Db/C# Concert) (C Concert) &b˙ & ∫œ & #˙ ‹œ w #œ w bœ ‹œ &b˙ #˙ ∫œ & w ∫œ ‹œ USE 1st VALVE SLIDE USE 3rd VALVE SLIDE Alt.: 1-2-3 Alt.: Alt.: 3 Alt.: Alt.: Possible: Possible: Possible: Possible: 3 (3rd slide) Possible: 2-3 (3rd slide) b # DCb# C B BA A (B Concert) (Bb Concert) (A Concert) (Ab/G# Concert) (G Concert) &b˙ & ∫œ & & & #˙ ‹œ w #œ w bœ ‹œ bw #w ∫œ w ∫œ ‹œ USE 3rd VALVE SLIDE USE 1st VALVE SLIDE Alt.: Alt.: Alt.: Alt.: Alt.: 3 Possible: 1-3 (slides) Possible: 1-2-3 (slides) Possible: Possible: Possible: b# b# AG G GF F E (Gb/F# Concert) (F Concert) (E Concert) (Eb Concert) (D Concert) USE 1st VALVE SLIDE USE 1st VALVE SLIDE & & & & & bw #w ∫œ w ‹œ b˙ #˙ ‹œ w ∫œ #œ w bœ ‹œ USE 3rd VALVE SLIDE USE 3rd VALVE SLIDE USE 3rd VALVE SLIDE USE 3rd VALVE SLIDE Alt.: Alt.: Alt.: Alt.: Alt: Possible: 3 (3rd slide) Possible: 2-3 (3rd slide) Possible: 1-3 (slides) Possible: Possible: b B Trumpet Fingering Chart, Page 2. Copyright © 1999 by Andrew B. Spang. May NOT be reproduced without permission. All Rights Reserved. b B Trumpet Fingering Chart Created by Andrew B. Spang. Edited by Joshua Whitehouse. Common Note Names: Weird Spellings: This is what the note is Just like you could be called “Son of Sue” or usually called. Some “Daughter of Frank,” some notes can be called some notes can have more than pretty strange things. These notes are shown with one name, just like you filled in noteheads to show that they are unusual, but can be called by your first possible, names. You can pretty much ignore these name, or your last name until you see one in your music. (or a combination of them). Don’t be confused, b # The Best Fingering: all the notes in one box BA The best way to finger a note is shown by the picture. sound the same. (Ab/G# Concert) The valves are shown 1 to 3, left to right. If you can’t finger a note this way (say in a fast passage or trill) then check the “Alt:” below. & bw #w ∫œ Concert Pitch: Because TRUMPET is a Alternate Fingerings: transposing instrument, Other ways of fingering notes that are acceptable to we call the notes by dif- use are shown here. Sometimes the alternate finger- ferent names that what ing may be more in-tune on your trumpet than the they really sound. main fingering listed in the picture. Then you should Concert Pitch means “the Alt.: consider the Alt: fingering your main fingering. same as everybody else.” Possible: 1-2-3 Possible Fingerings: These will work, but they are often more difficult, out These are what the notes look like. of tune, and ugly sounding. They are listed just to The notes named in the top of the box help you make lip slur exercises and work out diffi- will be shown with whole notes. cult trills or runs. This is not the best way to play a given note. b B Trumpet Fingering Chart, Cover. Copyright © 1999 by Andrew B. Spang. May NOT be reproduced without permission. All Rights Reserved..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enharmonic Substitution in Bernard Herrmann's Early Works
    Enharmonic Substitution in Bernard Herrmann’s Early Works By William Wrobel In the course of my research of Bernard Herrmann scores over the years, I’ve recently come across what I assume to be an interesting notational inconsistency in Herrmann’s scores. Several months ago I began to earnestly focus on his scores prior to 1947, especially while doing research of his Citizen Kane score (1941) for my Film Score Rundowns website (http://www.filmmusic.cjb.net). Also I visited UCSB to study his Symphony (1941) and earlier scores. What I noticed is that roughly prior to 1947 Herrmann tended to consistently write enharmonic notes for certain diatonic chords, especially E substituted for Fb (F-flat) in, say, Fb major 7th (Fb/Ab/Cb/Eb) chords, and (less frequently) B substituted for Cb in, say, Ab minor (Ab/Cb/Eb) triads. Occasionally I would see instances of other note exchanges such as Gb for F# in a D maj 7 chord. This enharmonic substitution (or “equivalence” if you prefer that term) is overwhelmingly consistent in Herrmann’ notational practice in scores roughly prior to 1947, and curiously abandoned by the composer afterwards. The notational “inconsistency,” therefore, relates to the change of practice split between these two periods of Herrmann’s career, almost a form of “Before” and “After” portrayal of his notational habits. Indeed, after examination of several dozens of his scores in the “After” period, I have seen (so far in this ongoing research) only one instance of enharmonic substitution similar to what Herrmann engaged in before 1947 (see my discussion in point # 19 on Battle of Neretva).
    [Show full text]
  • Finale Transposition Chart, by Makemusic User Forum Member Motet (6/5/2016) Trans
    Finale Transposition Chart, by MakeMusic user forum member Motet (6/5/2016) Trans. Sounding Written Inter- Key Usage (Some Common Western Instruments) val Alter C Up 2 octaves Down 2 octaves -14 0 Glockenspiel D¯ Up min. 9th Down min. 9th -8 5 D¯ Piccolo C* Up octave Down octave -7 0 Piccolo, Celesta, Xylophone, Handbells B¯ Up min. 7th Down min. 7th -6 2 B¯ Piccolo Trumpet, Soprillo Sax A Up maj. 6th Down maj. 6th -5 -3 A Piccolo Trumpet A¯ Up min. 6th Down min. 6th -5 4 A¯ Clarinet F Up perf. 4th Down perf. 4th -3 1 F Trumpet E Up maj. 3rd Down maj. 3rd -2 -4 E Trumpet E¯* Up min. 3rd Down min. 3rd -2 3 E¯ Clarinet, E¯ Flute, E¯ Trumpet, Soprano Cornet, Sopranino Sax D Up maj. 2nd Down maj. 2nd -1 -2 D Clarinet, D Trumpet D¯ Up min. 2nd Down min. 2nd -1 5 D¯ Flute C Unison Unison 0 0 Concert pitch, Horn in C alto B Down min. 2nd Up min. 2nd 1 -5 Horn in B (natural) alto, B Trumpet B¯* Down maj. 2nd Up maj. 2nd 1 2 B¯ Clarinet, B¯ Trumpet, Soprano Sax, Horn in B¯ alto, Flugelhorn A* Down min. 3rd Up min. 3rd 2 -3 A Clarinet, Horn in A, Oboe d’Amore A¯ Down maj. 3rd Up maj. 3rd 2 4 Horn in A¯ G* Down perf. 4th Up perf. 4th 3 -1 Horn in G, Alto Flute G¯ Down aug. 4th Up aug. 4th 3 6 Horn in G¯ F# Down dim.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Vs. Sounding Pitch
    Written Vs. Sounding Pitch Donald Byrd School of Music, Indiana University January 2004; revised January 2005 Thanks to Alan Belkin, Myron Bloom, Tim Crawford, Michael Good, Caitlin Hunter, Eric Isaacson, Dave Meredith, Susan Moses, Paul Nadler, and Janet Scott for information and for comments on this document. "*" indicates scores I haven't seen personally. It is generally believed that converting written pitch to sounding pitch in conventional music notation is always a straightforward process. This is not true. In fact, it's sometimes barely possible to convert written pitch to sounding pitch with real confidence, at least for anyone but an expert who has examined the music closely. There are many reasons for this; a list follows. Note that the first seven or eight items are specific to various instruments, while the others are more generic. Note also that most of these items affect only the octave, so errors are easily overlooked and, as a practical matter, not that serious, though octave errors can result in mistakes in identifying the outer voices. The exceptions are timpani notation and accidental carrying, which can produce semitone errors; natural harmonics notated at fingered pitch, which can produce errors of a few large intervals; baritone horn and euphonium clef dependencies, which can produce errors of a major 9th; and scordatura and C scores, which can lead to errors of almost any amount. Obviously these are quite serious, even disasterous. It is also generally considered that the difference between written and sounding pitch is simply a matter of transposition. Several of these cases make it obvious that that view is correct only if the "transposition" can vary from note to note, and if it can be one or more octaves, or a smaller interval plus one or more octaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuning Forks As Time Travel Machines: Pitch Standardisation and Historicism for ”Sonic Things”: Special Issue of Sound Studies Fanny Gribenski
    Tuning forks as time travel machines: Pitch standardisation and historicism For ”Sonic Things”: Special issue of Sound Studies Fanny Gribenski To cite this version: Fanny Gribenski. Tuning forks as time travel machines: Pitch standardisation and historicism For ”Sonic Things”: Special issue of Sound Studies. Sound Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Taylor & Francis Online, 2020. hal-03005009 HAL Id: hal-03005009 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03005009 Submitted on 13 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Tuning forks as time travel machines: Pitch standardisation and historicism Fanny Gribenski CNRS / IRCAM, Paris For “Sonic Things”: Special issue of Sound Studies Biographical note: Fanny Gribenski is a Research Scholar at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and IRCAM, in Paris. She studied musicology and history at the École Normale Supérieure of Lyon, the Paris Conservatory, and the École des hautes études en sciences sociales. She obtained her PhD in 2015 with a dissertation on the history of concert life in nineteenth-century French churches, which served as the basis for her first book, L’Église comme lieu de concert. Pratiques musicales et usages de l’espace (1830– 1905) (Arles: Actes Sud / Palazzetto Bru Zane, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Trumpet, Cornet, Flugelhorn GRADE 5 from 2017
    Trumpet, Cornet, Flugelhorn GRADE 5 from 2017 THREE PIECES: one chosen by the candidate from each of the three Lists, A, B and C: LIST A 1 Bizet Chanson bohème. Great Winners, arr. Lawrance (Brass Wind: brass edition; B piano accomp. published & b separately) 2 J. Clarke The Prince of Denmark’s March. No. 9 from Old English Trumpet Tunes, Book 1, arr. Lawton (OUP) 3 Debussy The Girl with the Flaxen Hair. Winning Matrix for Trumpet, arr. Lawrance (Brass Wind: & brass edition; piano accomp. published separately) 4 John Frith Caber Dance ¸ Shining Brass, Book 2 (ABRSM: / brass edition; B piano accomp. published ˝ & ? b 5 David A. Stowell Jam Bouree ˛ separately) 6 Gibbons Coranto (ending at Fig. D). No. 2 from Gibbons Keyboard Suite for Trumpet, arr. Cruft (Stainer & Bell 2588: B b/C edition) 7 Hummel Romanze. Time Pieces for Trumpet, Vol. 3, arr. Harris and Wallace (ABRSM) 8 Schubert Ave Maria. Trumpet in Church, arr. Denwood (Emerson E283) 9 Verdi Triumphal March (from Aida). Onstage Brass for Trumpet, arr. Calland (Stainer & Bell H430) LIST B 1 Tom Davoren Lindy Hop! ¸ Shining Brass, Book 2 (ABRSM: / brass edition; B piano accomp. published ˝ & ? b 2 Peter Meechan Final Thought ˛ separately) 3 Barry Gray Thunderbirds. Great Winners, arr. Lawrance (Brass Wind: brass edition; B piano accomp. published & b separately) 4 Joplin Solace: A Mexican Serenade. Concert Repertoire for Trumpet, arr. Calland (Faber) 5 Bryan Kelly Miss Slight (Spinster of this Parish): No. 4 from Whodunnit – Suite for Trumpet (Stainer & Bell H442) 6 McCabe P. B. Blues: No. 3 from Dances for Trumpet (Novello NOV120530) 7 Prokofiev March (from The Love for Three Oranges).
    [Show full text]
  • Instruments of the Orchestra
    INSTRUMENTS OF THE ORCHESTRA String Family WHAT: Wooden, hollow-bodied instruments strung with metal strings across a bridge. WHERE: Find this family in the front of the orchestra and along the right side. HOW: Sound is produced by a vibrating string that is bowed with a bow made of horse tail hair. The air then resonates in the hollow body. Other playing techniques include pizzicato (plucking the strings), col legno (playing with the wooden part of the bow), and double-stopping (bowing two strings at once). WHY: Composers use these instruments for their singing quality and depth of sound. HOW MANY: There are four sizes of stringed instruments: violin, viola, cello and bass. A total of forty-four are used in full orchestras. The string family is the largest family in the orchestra, accounting for over half of the total number of musicians on stage. The string instruments all have carved, hollow, wooden bodies with four strings running from top to bottom. The instruments have basically the same shape but vary in size, from the smaller VIOLINS and VIOLAS, which are played by being held firmly under the chin and either bowed or plucked, to the larger CELLOS and BASSES, which stand on the floor, supported by a long rod called an end pin. The cello is always played in a seated position, while the bass is so large that a musician must stand or sit on a very high stool in order to play it. These stringed instruments developed from an older instrument called the viol, which had six strings.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutti Brassi
    Tutti Brassi A brief description of different ways of sounding brass instruments Jeremy Montagu © Jeremy Montagu 2018 The author’s moral rights have been asserted Hataf Segol Publications 2018 Typeset in XƎLATEX by Simon Montagu Why Mouthpieces 1 Cornets and Bugles 16 Long Trumpets 19 Playing the Handhorn in the French Tradition 26 The Mysteries of Fingerhole Horns 29 Horn Chords and Other Tricks 34 Throat or Overtone Singing 38 iii This began as a dinner conversation with Mark Smith of the Ori- ental Institute here, in connexion with the Tutankhamun trum- pets, and progressed from why these did not have mouthpieces to ‘When were mouthpieces introduced?’, to which, on reflection, the only answer seemed to be ‘Often’, for from the Danish lurs onwards, some trumpets or horns had them and some did not, in so many cultures. But indeed, ‘Why mouthpieces?’ There seem to be two main answers: one to enable the lips to access a tube too narrow for the lips to access unaided, and the other depends on what the trumpeter’s expectations are for the instrument to achieve. In our own culture, from the late Renaissance and Early Baroque onwards, trumpeters expected a great deal, as we can see in Bendinelli’s and Fantini’s tutors, both of which are avail- able in facsimile, and in the concert repertoire from Monteverdi’s L’Orfeo onwards. As a result, mouthpieces were already large, both wide enough and deep enough to allow the player to bend the 11th and 13th partials and other notes easily. The transition from the base of the cup into the backbore was a sharp edge.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrument Descriptions
    RENAISSANCE INSTRUMENTS Shawm and Bagpipes The shawm is a member of a double reed tradition traceable back to ancient Egypt and prominent in many cultures (the Turkish zurna, Chinese so- na, Javanese sruni, Hindu shehnai). In Europe it was combined with brass instruments to form the principal ensemble of the wind band in the 15th and 16th centuries and gave rise in the 1660’s to the Baroque oboe. The reed of the shawm is manipulated directly by the player’s lips, allowing an extended range. The concept of inserting a reed into an airtight bag above a simple pipe is an old one, used in ancient Sumeria and Greece, and found in almost every culture. The bag acts as a reservoir for air, allowing for continuous sound. Many civic and court wind bands of the 15th and early 16th centuries include listings for bagpipes, but later they became the provenance of peasants, used for dances and festivities. Dulcian The dulcian, or bajón, as it was known in Spain, was developed somewhere in the second quarter of the 16th century, an attempt to create a bass reed instrument with a wide range but without the length of a bass shawm. This was accomplished by drilling a bore that doubled back on itself in the same piece of wood, producing an instrument effectively twice as long as the piece of wood that housed it and resulting in a sweeter and softer sound with greater dynamic flexibility. The dulcian provided the bass for brass and reed ensembles throughout its existence. During the 17th century, it became an important solo and continuo instrument and was played into the early 18th century, alongside the jointed bassoon which eventually displaced it.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedagogical Practices Related to the Ability to Discern and Correct
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2014 Pedagogical Practices Related to the Ability to Discern and Correct Intonation Errors: An Evaluation of Current Practices, Expectations, and a Model for Instruction Ryan Vincent Scherber Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MUSIC PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES RELATED TO THE ABILITY TO DISCERN AND CORRECT INTONATION ERRORS: AN EVALUATION OF CURRENT PRACTICES, EXPECTATIONS, AND A MODEL FOR INSTRUCTION By RYAN VINCENT SCHERBER A Dissertation submitted to the College of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2014 Ryan V. Scherber defended this dissertation on June 18, 2014. The members of the supervisory committee were: William Fredrickson Professor Directing Dissertation Alexander Jimenez University Representative John Geringer Committee Member Patrick Dunnigan Committee Member Clifford Madsen Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Mary Scherber, a selfless individual to whom I owe much. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this journey would not have been possible without the care and support of my family, mentors, colleagues, and friends. Your support and encouragement have proven invaluable throughout this process and I feel privileged to have earned your kindness and assistance. To Dr. William Fredrickson, I extend my deepest and most sincere gratitude. You have been a remarkable inspiration during my time at FSU and I will be eternally thankful for the opportunity to have worked closely with you.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Trumpet Music and the Modern Performer A
    NATURAL TRUMPET MUSIC AND THE MODERN PERFORMER A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Music Laura Bloss December, 2012 NATURAL TRUMPET MUSIC AND THE MODERN PERFORMER Laura Bloss Thesis Approved: Accepted: _________________________ _________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Dr. Brooks Toliver Dr. Chand Midha _________________________ _________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. Scott Johnston Dr. George R. Newkome _________________________ _________________________ School Director Date Dr. Ann Usher ii ABSTRACT The Baroque Era can be considered the “golden age” of trumpet playing in Western Music. Recently, there has been a revival of interest in Baroque trumpet works, and while the research has grown accordingly, the implications of that research require further examination. Musicians need to be able to give this factual evidence a context, one that is both modern and historical. The treatises of Cesare Bendinelli, Girolamo Fantini, and J.E. Altenburg are valuable records that provide insight into the early development of the trumpet. There are also several important modern resources, most notably by Don Smithers and Edward Tarr, which discuss the historical development of the trumpet. One obstacle for modern players is that the works of the Baroque Era were originally played on natural trumpet, an instrument that is now considered a specialty rather than the standard. Trumpet players must thus find ways to reconcile the inherent differences between Baroque and current approaches to playing by combining research from early treatises, important trumpet publications, and technical and philosophical input from performance practice essays.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Music Transcription Using Sequence to Sequence Learning
    Automatic music transcription using sequence to sequence learning Master’s thesis of B.Sc. Maximilian Awiszus At the faculty of Computer Science Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Alexander Waibel Second reviewer: Prof. Dr. Advisor: M.Sc. Thai-Son Nguyen Duration: 25. Mai 2019 – 25. November 2019 KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu Interactive Systems Labs Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Title: Automatic music transcription using sequence to sequence learning Author: B.Sc. Maximilian Awiszus Maximilian Awiszus Kronenstraße 12 76133 Karlsruhe [email protected] ii Statement of Authorship I hereby declare that this thesis is my own original work which I created without illegitimate help by others, that I have not used any other sources or resources than the ones indicated and that due acknowledgement is given where reference is made to the work of others. Karlsruhe, 15. M¨arz 2017 ............................................ (B.Sc. Maximilian Awiszus) Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Acoustic music . .4 1.2 Musical note and sheet music . .5 1.3 Musical Instrument Digital Interface . .6 1.4 Instruments and inference . .7 1.5 Fourier analysis . .8 1.6 Sequence to sequence learning . 10 1.6.1 LSTM based S2S learning . 11 2 Related work 13 2.1 Music transcription . 13 2.1.1 Non-negative matrix factorization . 13 2.1.2 Neural networks . 14 2.2 Datasets . 18 2.2.1 MusicNet . 18 2.2.2 MAPS . 18 2.3 Natural Language Processing . 19 2.4 Music modelling .
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Probabilistic Topic Models
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Probabilistic Topic Models for Automatic Harmonic Analysis of Music A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science by Diane J. Hu Committee in charge: Professor Lawrence Saul, Chair Professor Serge Belongie Professor Shlomo Dubnov Professor Charles Elkan Professor Gert Lanckriet 2012 Copyright Diane J. Hu, 2012 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Diane J. Hu is approved, and it is ac- ceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2012 iii DEDICATION To my mom and dad who inspired me to work hard.... and go to grad school. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page . iii Dedication . iv Table of Contents . v List of Figures . viii List of Tables . xii Acknowledgements . xiv Vita . xvi Abstract of the Dissertation . xvii Chapter 1 Introduction . 1 1.1 Music Information Retrieval . 1 1.1.1 Content-Based Music Analysis . 2 1.1.2 Music Descriptors . 3 1.2 Problem Overview . 5 1.2.1 Problem Definition . 5 1.2.2 Motivation . 5 1.2.3 Contributions . 7 1.3 Thesis Organization . 9 Chapter 2 Background & Previous Work . 10 2.1 Overview . 10 2.2 Musical Building Blocks . 10 2.2.1 Pitch and frequency . 11 2.2.2 Rhythm, tempo, and loudness . 17 2.2.3 Melody, harmony, and chords . 18 2.3 Tonality . 18 2.3.1 Theory of Tonality . 19 2.3.2 Tonality in music . 22 2.4 Tonality Induction . 25 2.4.1 Feature Extraction . 26 2.4.2 Tonal Models for Symbolic Input .
    [Show full text]