Applications of Information Geometry to Hypothesis Testing and Signal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Applications of Information Geometry to Hypothesis Testing and Signal CMCAA 2016 ApplicationsApplications ofof InformationInformation GeometryGeometry toto HypothesisHypothesis TestingTesting andand SignalSignal DetectionDetection Yongqiang Cheng National University of Defense Technology July 2016 OutlineOutline 1. Principles of Information Geometry 2. Geometry of Hypothesis Testing 3. Matrix CFAR Detection on Manifold of Symmetric Positive-Definite Matrices 4. Geometry of Matrix CFAR Detection 1.1. PrinciplesPrinciples ofof InformationInformation GeometryGeometry Important problems in statistics Distribution (likelihood): p(x|θ) where . x is a vector of data . θ is a vector of unknowns 1. How much does the data x tell about the unknown θ ? 2. How good is an estimator θ ˆ ? 3. How to measure difference between two distributions? 4. How about the structure of a statistical model specified by a family of distributions? 3 1.1. PrinciplesPrinciples ofof InformationInformation GeometryGeometry What is information geometry? Data Distributions Manifold Data processing Statistics Information Geometry 4 1.1. PrinciplesPrinciples ofof InformationInformation GeometryGeometry . Information geometry is the study of intrinsic properties of manifolds of probability distributions by way of differential geometry. The main tenet of information geometry is that many important structures in information theory and statistics can be treated as structures in differential geometry by regarding a space of probabilities as a differentiable manifold endowed with a Riemannian metric and a family of affine connections. Statistics Information Theory Probability Theory Relationships with Information Geometry other subjects Physics Differential Geometry Systems Riemannian Theory Geometry 5 1.1. PrinciplesPrinciples ofof InformationInformation GeometryGeometry n . Statistical manifold ,,GpR (|)|x θ x ,θ logp log p . Riemannian metric GEθ ij θθ . Affine connections 1 jim ()θ El (,)x θ l (,)x θ Ell (,)x θ (,)x θ l (,)x θ θθji m2 j i m . Distance and geodesic 2 T ds gij()θθdd i j dG()θθ d . Curvatures Rllllsls ijkjk ik ij js ik ks ij xxs 6 OutlineOutline 1. Principles of Information Geometry 2. Geometry of Hypothesis Testing 3. Matrix CFAR Detection on Manifold of Symmetric Positive-Definite Matrices 4. Geometry of Matrix CFAR Detection 2.2. GeometryGeometry ofof HypothesisHypothesis TestingTesting 1)Start from target detection 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 P(|x 0 ) P(|x 1 ) x Hypothesis testing 8 2.2. GeometryGeometry ofof HypothesisHypothesis TestingTesting 2)Likelihood ratio test • Principles Make division of observation space • Basic method P(|x 0 ) The detector decides 1 if the likelihood P(|x ) ratio exceeds a threshold 1 p(|x ) L()x 1 p(|x 0 ) x • Essentials of signal detection p(|x ) Discrimination between two identically L()x 1 p(|x 0 ) distributed distributions with Likelihood ratio test different parameters. 9 2.2. GeometryGeometry ofof HypothesisHypothesis TestingTesting 3)Geometric interpretation of hypothesis testing 2 1 x px;, exp 2 2 HR ,;0 2 2 AB B C dABF (,) A CD dCDF (, ) D Familyofdistributions Statisticalmanifold Consider hypothesis testing from a geometric viewpoint 10 2.2. GeometryGeometry ofof HypothesisHypothesis TestingTesting 3)Geometric interpretation of hypothesis testing • Equivalence between LRT and Kullback-Leibler divergence Suppose xx 12 ,,, x N are N i.i.d. observations from a distribution qx () , and there are two models (hypotheses) for qx () , denoted by px 0 () qx() D(||)qp qx ()ln dx and px 1 () . Then, the likelihood ratio is KLD px() N px()1 1 L 1 i 1 Dq(||) p01 Dq (||)p px() i1 0 i 0 0 N Minimum distance detector 1 • Error exponent: KPlim log M N N NK • Stein’s lemma: K Dp( 01|| p) PM 2 11 2.2. GeometryGeometry ofof HypothesisHypothesis TestingTesting 3)Geometric interpretation of hypothesis testing p(|x ) The problem of hypothesis p(|x 0 ) 1 testing can be regarded as a discrimination problem where x X the decision is made by comparing distances from the p(|)x θ signal distribution estimates to d1 d0 p(|x θ1 ) two hypotheses in the sense p(|x θ0 ) S of the KL divergence, i.e., selecting the model that is 1 1 Dq(||) p01 Dq (||)p “closer” to signal distribution 0 N estimates. Minimum distance detector 12 OutlineOutline 1. Principles of Information Geometry 2. Geometry of Hypothesis Testing 3. Matrix CFAR Detection on Manifold of Symmetric Positive-Definite Matrices 4. Geometry of Matrix CFAR Detection 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 1)Constant false alarm rate detector c ll ce b n io Classical CFAR detector ct a te de Decision by comparing the targets content of the cell under samples test with an adaptive threshold given by the x1 …… xN 21 xN 2 xD xN 2 xN 21 …… xN arithmetic mean of the …… …… Arithmetic mean reference cells to achieve 0 0: target absent the desired constant Decision 1 1: target present probability of false alarm. Threshold 14 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 2)Matrix CFAR detector In 2008, F. Barbaresco proposed a generalized R1 Ri Ri1 RN CFAR technique based on the manifold of symmetric R R positive definite (SPD) matrices. It has been proved that the R 1 R Riemannian distance-based N RD detector has better R Ri1 detection performance than R2 Ri the classical CFAR detector. 15 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 2)Matrix CFAR detector • Riemannian distance between two SPD matrices 2 n 212122 d RR12,ln R 1 RR 21 lnk k 1 • Riemannian center of N SPD matrices N p RR arg minwdii , R R i1 where p=1, R denotes the median; p=2, R is the mean. • The matrix CFAR detector d RR, i 16 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 2)Matrix CFAR detector Initial spectra of measurements Mean spectra of measurements Intensity Classical detector Geometric detector 17 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 3)Robust matrix CFAR detector • Two shortcomings of the Riemannian distance based matrix CFAR detector a) Computational cost is expensive for exponential operations in the calculation of Riemannian distance and its average; b) Riemannian mean and median are not robust to outlier. 18 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 3)Robust matrix CFAR detector • Symmetrized Kullback-Leibler (sKL) divergence based matrix CFAR detector • Total Kullback-Leibler (tKL) divergence based matrix CFAR detector Sample Data Covariance CUT R Matrix R R1 Ri Ri+1 N sKL mean, sKL median, tKL t center Divergence >Threshold Computation 19 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 3)Robust matrix CFAR detector • sKL divergence between two SPD matrices 11 sKLRR12,tr( RR 12 RR 21 2) I • sKL mean of N SPD matrices 1 12 11NN RRR= 1 ik NNik=1 =1 • sKL median of N SPD matrices 1 12 1 NNR R R i j k1 ij11sKL RR,,sKL RR ki k j 20 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 3)Robust matrix CFAR detector • The tKL divergence is a special case of the total Bregman divergence tBD, which is invariant to linear transformation. BDxy(, ) f x f y x y, f y f xfyxyfy , tBD(, x y ) More robust 2 1fy BD x , y BD x , y tBD x , y tBD x , y 21 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 3)Robust matrix CFAR detector • tKL divergence between two SPD matrices 11 log det RR12 tr RR 21 n tKLRR12, 2 log det R2 n1log2 2c log det R 42 2 • tKL center of N SPD matrices inversely proportional to the 1 value of divergence gradient, RRww1 , i ii i which is robust to outliers i j j 1 2 log det R i n1log2 where i 2 c log det Ri 42 22 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 3)Robust matrix CFAR detector • Comparisons of dissimilarity measures between Riemannian distance, sKL divergence and tKL divergence The signal-to-clutter ratio (SCR) is significantly improved by the mapping of tKL divergence. 23 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 3)Robust matrix CFAR detector • Comparisons of detection performance between Riemannian distance, sKL divergence and tKL divergence The tKL divergence based matrix CFAR detector has better performance. 24 3.3. MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection 3)Robust matrix CFAR detector Table I The time taken by different algorithms Algorithm Time (s) Riemannian mean detector 29.74 Riemannian median detector 41.66 sKL mean detector 0.09 sKL median detector 2.81 tKL t center detector 0.15 25 OutlineOutline 1. Principles of Information Geometry 2. Geometry of Hypothesis Testing 3. Matrix CFAR Detection on Manifold of Symmetric Positive-Definite Matrices 4. Geometry of Matrix CFAR Detection 4.4. GeometryGeometry ofof MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection Classical CFAR detector Euclidean space R 1 R Euclidean distance measure N Matrix CFAR detector RD R Ri1 Matrix manifold Riemannian distance measure R2 Ri KL divergence, etc. A good detector should R R1 N Properly characterize the RD R Ri1 R2 intrinsic structure of the Ri measurement space Maximize the divergence between two hypotheses (clusters) 27 4.4. GeometryGeometry ofof MatrixMatrix CFARCFAR DetectionDetection Future work Other divergences which have better performance to measure the dissimilarity between distributions Better approaches for clustering the distributions Detectors for heavy clutters Detectors for nonstationary clutters Detectors for few samples 28 Thank you for your attention! .
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Information Geometry – Based on the Book “Methods of Information Geometry ”Written by Shun-Ichi Amari and Hiroshi Nagaoka
    Introduction to Information Geometry – based on the book “Methods of Information Geometry ”written by Shun-Ichi Amari and Hiroshi Nagaoka Yunshu Liu 2012-02-17 Introduction to differential geometry Geometric structure of statistical models and statistical inference Outline 1 Introduction to differential geometry Manifold and Submanifold Tangent vector, Tangent space and Vector field Riemannian metric and Affine connection Flatness and autoparallel 2 Geometric structure of statistical models and statistical inference The Fisher metric and α-connection Exponential family Divergence and Geometric statistical inference Yunshu Liu (ASPITRG) Introduction to Information Geometry 2 / 79 Introduction to differential geometry Geometric structure of statistical models and statistical inference Part I Introduction to differential geometry Yunshu Liu (ASPITRG) Introduction to Information Geometry 3 / 79 Introduction to differential geometry Geometric structure of statistical models and statistical inference Basic concepts in differential geometry Basic concepts Manifold and Submanifold Tangent vector, Tangent space and Vector field Riemannian metric and Affine connection Flatness and autoparallel Yunshu Liu (ASPITRG) Introduction to Information Geometry 4 / 79 Introduction to differential geometry Geometric structure of statistical models and statistical inference Manifold Manifold S n Manifold: a set with a coordinate system, a one-to-one mapping from S to R , n supposed to be ”locally” looks like an open subset of R ” n Elements of the set(points): points in R , probability distribution, linear system. Figure : A coordinate system ξ for a manifold S Yunshu Liu (ASPITRG) Introduction to Information Geometry 5 / 79 Introduction to differential geometry Geometric structure of statistical models and statistical inference Manifold Manifold S Definition: Let S be a set, if there exists a set of coordinate systems A for S which satisfies the condition (1) and (2) below, we call S an n-dimensional C1 differentiable manifold.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1907.11122V2 [Math-Ph] 23 Aug 2019 on M Which Are Dual with Respect to G
    Canonical divergence for flat α-connections: Classical and Quantum Domenico Felice1, ∗ and Nihat Ay2, y 1Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Inselstrasse 22{04103 Leipzig, Germany 2 Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Inselstrasse 22{04103 Leipzig, Germany Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Rd, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Leipzig, PF 100920, 04009 Leipzig, Germany A recent canonical divergence, which is introduced on a smooth manifold M endowed with a general dualistic structure (g; r; r∗), is considered for flat α-connections. In the classical setting, we compute such a canonical divergence on the manifold of positive measures and prove that it coincides with the classical α-divergence. In the quantum framework, the recent canonical divergence is evaluated for the quantum α-connections on the manifold of all positive definite Hermitian operators. Also in this case we obtain that the recent canonical divergence is the quantum α-divergence. PACS numbers: Classical differential geometry (02.40.Hw), Riemannian geometries (02.40.Ky), Quantum Information (03.67.-a). I. INTRODUCTION Methods of Information Geometry (IG) [1] are ubiquitous in physical sciences and encom- pass both classical and quantum systems [2]. The natural object of study in IG is a quadruple (M; g; r; r∗) given by a smooth manifold M, a Riemannian metric g and a pair of affine connections arXiv:1907.11122v2 [math-ph] 23 Aug 2019 on M which are dual with respect to g, ∗ X g (Y; Z) = g (rX Y; Z) + g (Y; rX Z) ; (1) for all sections X; Y; Z 2 T (M).
    [Show full text]
  • Information Geometry of Orthogonal Initializations and Training
    Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2020 INFORMATION GEOMETRY OF ORTHOGONAL INITIALIZATIONS AND TRAINING Piotr Aleksander Sokół and Il Memming Park Department of Neurobiology and Behavior Departments of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, and Electrical and Computer Engineering Institutes for Advanced Computing Science and AI-driven Discovery and Innovation Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11733 {memming.park, piotr.sokol}@stonybrook.edu ABSTRACT Recently mean field theory has been successfully used to analyze properties of wide, random neural networks. It gave rise to a prescriptive theory for initializing feed-forward neural networks with orthogonal weights, which ensures that both the forward propagated activations and the backpropagated gradients are near `2 isome- tries and as a consequence training is orders of magnitude faster. Despite strong empirical performance, the mechanisms by which critical initializations confer an advantage in the optimization of deep neural networks are poorly understood. Here we show a novel connection between the maximum curvature of the optimization landscape (gradient smoothness) as measured by the Fisher information matrix (FIM) and the spectral radius of the input-output Jacobian, which partially explains why more isometric networks can train much faster. Furthermore, given that or- thogonal weights are necessary to ensure that gradient norms are approximately preserved at initialization, we experimentally investigate the benefits of maintaining orthogonality throughout training, and we conclude that manifold optimization of weights performs well regardless of the smoothness of the gradients. Moreover, we observe a surprising yet robust behavior of highly isometric initializations — even though such networks have a lower FIM condition number at initialization, and therefore by analogy to convex functions should be easier to optimize, experimen- tally they prove to be much harder to train with stochastic gradient descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Geometry and Optimal Transport
    Call for Papers Special Issue Affine Differential Geometry and Hesse Geometry: A Tribute and Memorial to Jean-Louis Koszul Submission Deadline: 30th November 2019 Jean-Louis Koszul (January 3, 1921 – January 12, 2018) was a French mathematician with prominent influence to a wide range of mathematical fields. He was a second generation member of Bourbaki, with several notions in geometry and algebra named after him. He made a great contribution to the fundamental theory of Differential Geometry, which is foundation of Information Geometry. The special issue is dedicated to Koszul for the mathematics he developed that bear on information sciences. Both original contributions and review articles are solicited. Topics include but are not limited to: Affine differential geometry over statistical manifolds Hessian and Kahler geometry Divergence geometry Convex geometry and analysis Differential geometry over homogeneous and symmetric spaces Jordan algebras and graded Lie algebras Pre-Lie algebras and their cohomology Geometric mechanics and Thermodynamics over homogeneous spaces Guest Editor Hideyuki Ishi (Graduate School of Mathematics, Nagoya University) e-mail: [email protected] Submit at www.editorialmanager.com/inge Please select 'S.I.: Affine differential geometry and Hessian geometry Jean-Louis Koszul (Memorial/Koszul)' Photo Author: Konrad Jacobs. Source: Archives of the Mathema�sches Forschungsins�tut Oberwolfach Editor-in-Chief Shinto Eguchi (Tokyo) Special Issue Co-Editors Information Geometry and Optimal Transport Nihat
    [Show full text]
  • Information Geometry (Part 1)
    October 22, 2010 Information Geometry (Part 1) John Baez Information geometry is the study of 'statistical manifolds', which are spaces where each point is a hypothesis about some state of affairs. In statistics a hypothesis amounts to a probability distribution, but we'll also be looking at the quantum version of a probability distribution, which is called a 'mixed state'. Every statistical manifold comes with a way of measuring distances and angles, called the Fisher information metric. In the first seven articles in this series, I'll try to figure out what this metric really means. The formula for it is simple enough, but when I first saw it, it seemed quite mysterious. A good place to start is this interesting paper: • Gavin E. Crooks, Measuring thermodynamic length. which was pointed out by John Furey in a discussion about entropy and uncertainty. The idea here should work for either classical or quantum statistical mechanics. The paper describes the classical version, so just for a change of pace let me describe the quantum version. First a lightning review of quantum statistical mechanics. Suppose you have a quantum system with some Hilbert space. When you know as much as possible about your system, then you describe it by a unit vector in this Hilbert space, and you say your system is in a pure state. Sometimes people just call a pure state a 'state'. But that can be confusing, because in statistical mechanics you also need more general 'mixed states' where you don't know as much as possible. A mixed state is described by a density matrix, meaning a positive operator with trace equal to 1: tr( ) = 1 The idea is that any observable is described by a self-adjoint operator A, and the expected value of this observable in the mixed state is A = tr( A) The entropy of a mixed state is defined by S( ) = −tr( ln ) where we take the logarithm of the density matrix just by taking the log of each of its eigenvalues, while keeping the same eigenvectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Geometry: Near Randomness and Near Independence
    Khadiga Arwini and C.T.J. Dodson Information Geometry: Near Randomness and Near Independence Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1953 Springer Preface The main motivation for this book lies in the breadth of applications in which a statistical model is used to represent small departures from, for example, a Poisson process. Our approach uses information geometry to provide a com- mon context but we need only rather elementary material from differential geometry, information theory and mathematical statistics. Introductory sec- tions serve together to help those interested from the applications side in making use of our methods and results. We have available Mathematica note- books to perform many of the computations for those who wish to pursue their own calculations or developments. Some 44 years ago, the second author first encountered, at about the same time, differential geometry via relativity from Weyl's book [209] during un- dergraduate studies and information theory from Tribus [200, 201] via spatial statistical processes while working on research projects at Wiggins Teape Re- search and Development Ltd|cf. the Foreword in [196] and [170, 47, 58]. Hav- ing started work there as a student laboratory assistant in 1959, this research environment engendered a recognition of the importance of international col- laboration, and a lifelong research interest in randomness and near-Poisson statistical geometric processes, persisting at various rates through a career mainly involved with global differential geometry. From correspondence in the 1960s with Gabriel Kron [4, 124, 125] on his Diakoptics, and with Kazuo Kondo who influenced the post-war Japanese schools of differential geometry and supervised Shun-ichi Amari's doctorate [6], it was clear that both had a much wider remit than traditionally pursued elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Exponential Families: Dually-Flat, Hessian and Legendre Structures
    entropy Review Information Geometry of k-Exponential Families: Dually-Flat, Hessian and Legendre Structures Antonio M. Scarfone 1,* ID , Hiroshi Matsuzoe 2 ID and Tatsuaki Wada 3 ID 1 Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (ISC-CNR), c/o Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy 2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan; [email protected] 3 Region of Electrical and Electronic Systems Engineering, Ibaraki University, Nakanarusawa-cho, Hitachi 316-8511, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-011-090-7339 Received: 9 May 2018; Accepted: 1 June 2018; Published: 5 June 2018 Abstract: In this paper, we present a review of recent developments on the k-deformed statistical mechanics in the framework of the information geometry. Three different geometric structures are introduced in the k-formalism which are obtained starting from three, not equivalent, divergence functions, corresponding to the k-deformed version of Kullback–Leibler, “Kerridge” and Brègman divergences. The first statistical manifold derived from the k-Kullback–Leibler divergence form an invariant geometry with a positive curvature that vanishes in the k → 0 limit. The other two statistical manifolds are related to each other by means of a scaling transform and are both dually-flat. They have a dualistic Hessian structure endowed by a deformed Fisher metric and an affine connection that are consistent with a statistical scalar product based on the k-escort expectation. These flat geometries admit dual potentials corresponding to the thermodynamic Massieu and entropy functions that induce a Legendre structure of k-thermodynamics in the picture of the information geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Information-Geometric Optimization Algorithms: a Unifying Picture Via Invariance Principles
    Journal of Machine Learning Research 18 (2017) 1-65 Submitted 11/14; Revised 10/16; Published 4/17 Information-Geometric Optimization Algorithms: A Unifying Picture via Invariance Principles Yann Ollivier [email protected] CNRS & LRI (UMR 8623), Université Paris-Saclay 91405 Orsay, France Ludovic Arnold [email protected] Univ. Paris-Sud, LRI 91405 Orsay, France Anne Auger [email protected] Nikolaus Hansen [email protected] Inria & CMAP, Ecole polytechnique 91128 Palaiseau, France Editor: Una-May O’Reilly Abstract We present a canonical way to turn any smooth parametric family of probability distributions on an arbitrary search space 푋 into a continuous-time black-box optimization method on 푋, the information-geometric optimization (IGO) method. Invariance as a major design principle keeps the number of arbitrary choices to a minimum. The resulting IGO flow is the flow of an ordinary differential equation conducting the natural gradient ascentofan adaptive, time-dependent transformation of the objective function. It makes no particular assumptions on the objective function to be optimized. The IGO method produces explicit IGO algorithms through time discretization. It naturally recovers versions of known algorithms and offers a systematic way to derive new ones. In continuous search spaces, IGO algorithms take a form related to natural evolution strategies (NES). The cross-entropy method is recovered in a particular case with a large time step, and can be extended into a smoothed, parametrization-independent maximum likelihood update (IGO-ML). When applied to the family of Gaussian distributions on R푑, the IGO framework recovers a version of the well-known CMA-ES algorithm and of xNES.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisher-Rao Geometry of Dirichlet Distributions Alice Le Brigant, Stephen Preston, Stéphane Puechmorel
    Fisher-Rao geometry of Dirichlet distributions Alice Le Brigant, Stephen Preston, Stéphane Puechmorel To cite this version: Alice Le Brigant, Stephen Preston, Stéphane Puechmorel. Fisher-Rao geometry of Dirich- let distributions. Differential Geometry and its Applications, Elsevier, 2021, 74, pp.101702. 10.1016/j.difgeo.2020.101702. hal-02568473v2 HAL Id: hal-02568473 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02568473v2 Submitted on 7 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. FISHER-RAO GEOMETRY OF DIRICHLET DISTRIBUTIONS ALICE LE BRIGANT, STEPHEN C. PRESTON, AND STEPHANE´ PUECHMOREL Abstract. In this paper, we study the geometry induced by the Fisher-Rao metric on the parameter space of Dirichlet distributions. We show that this space is a Hadamard manifold, i.e. that it is geodesically complete and has everywhere negative sectional curvature. An important consequence for applications is that the Fr´echet mean of a set of Dirichlet distributions is uniquely defined in this geometry. 1. Introduction The differential geometric approach to probability theory and statistics has met increasing interest in the past years, from the theoretical point of view as well as in applications. In this approach, probability distributions are seen as elements of a differentiable manifold, on which a metric structure is defined through the choice of a Riemannian metric.
    [Show full text]
  • Information-Geometric Optimization Algorithms: a Unifying Picture Via Invariance Principles Yann Ollivier, Ludovic Arnold, Anne Auger, Nikolaus Hansen
    Information-Geometric Optimization Algorithms: A Unifying Picture via Invariance Principles Yann Ollivier, Ludovic Arnold, Anne Auger, Nikolaus Hansen To cite this version: Yann Ollivier, Ludovic Arnold, Anne Auger, Nikolaus Hansen. Information-Geometric Optimization Algorithms: A Unifying Picture via Invariance Principles. 2011. hal-00601503v2 HAL Id: hal-00601503 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00601503v2 Preprint submitted on 29 Jun 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Information-Geometric Optimization Algorithms: A Unifying Picture via Invariance Principles Yann Ollivier, Ludovic Arnold, Anne Auger, Nikolaus Hansen Abstract We present a canonical way to turn any smooth parametric fam- ily of probability distributions on an arbitrary search space X into a continuous-time black-box optimization method on X, the information- geometric optimization (IGO) method. Invariance as a major design principle keeps the number of arbitrary choices to a minimum. The resulting IGO flow is the flow of an ordinary differential equation con- ducting the natural gradient ascent of an adaptive, time-dependent transformation of the objective function. It makes no particular as- sumptions on the objective function to be optimized. The IGO method produces explicit IGO algorithms through time discretization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fisher-Rao Geometry of Beta Distributions Applied to the Study of Canonical Moments Alice Le Brigant, Stéphane Puechmorel
    The Fisher-Rao geometry of beta distributions applied to the study of canonical moments Alice Le Brigant, Stéphane Puechmorel To cite this version: Alice Le Brigant, Stéphane Puechmorel. The Fisher-Rao geometry of beta distributions applied to the study of canonical moments. 2019. hal-02100897 HAL Id: hal-02100897 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02100897 Preprint submitted on 16 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Fisher-Rao geometry of beta distributions applied to the study of canonical moments Alice Le Brigant and Stéphane Puechmorel Abstract This paper studies the Fisher-Rao geometry on the parameter space of beta distributions. We derive the geodesic equations and the sectional curvature, and prove that it is negative. This leads to uniqueness for the Riemannian centroid in that space. We use this Riemannian structure to study canonical moments, an intrinsic representation of the moments of a probability distribution. Drawing on the fact that a uniform distribution in the regular moment space corresponds to a product of beta distributions in the canonical moment space, we propose a mapping from the space of canonical moments to the product beta manifold, allowing us to use the Fisher-Rao geometry of beta distributions to compare and analyze canonical moments.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Geometry of Α-Projection in Mean Field Approximation
    Information Geometry of α-Projection in Mean Field Approximation Shun-ichi Amari,∗ Shiro Ikeda†and Hidetoshi Shimokawa‡ Abstract Information geometry is applied to mean field approximation for elucidating its properties in the spin glass model or the Boltzmann machine. The α-divergence is used for approximation, where α-geodesic projection plays an important role. The naive mean field approximation and TAP approximation are studied from the point of view of information geometry, which treats the intrinsic geometric structures of a family of probability distributions. The bifurcation of the α-projection is studied, at which the uniqueness of the α-approximation is broken. 1 Introduction Mean field approximation uses a simple tractable family of probability distributions to calculate quantities related to a complex probability distribution including mutual inter- actions. Information geometry, on the other hand, studies intrinsic geometrical structure existing in the manifold of probability distributions (Chentsov, 1982; Amari, 1985; Amari and Nagaoka, 2000). It was used for analyzing performances of learning in the Boltz- mann machine (Amari, Kurata and Nagaoka, 1992), the EM algorithm (Amari, 1995), multilayer perceptrons (Amari, 1998), etc. A number of new works appeared recently ∗RIKEN, BSI †PRESTO, JST ‡Univ. of Tokyo 1 which treated mean field approximation from the point of view of information geome- try (Tanaka [this volume], Tanaka [2000], Kappen [this volume], and Bhattacharyya and Keerthi [1999, 2000]). The present article studies the relation between mean field approximation and infor- mation geometry in more detail. We treat a simple spin model like the SK model or the Boltzmann machine, and study how the mean values of spins can be approximated.
    [Show full text]