DOCSLIB.ORG

WPT SAFE Action Plan 2019 2021 Revisions.JB.8.9.19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WPT SAFE Action Plan 2019 2021 Revisions.JB.8.9.19 Western Pond Turtle SAFE Action Plan for 2019 - 2021 Goal The long-term goal of the Western Pond Turtle SAFE program is to ensure the stability of remaining Western Pond Turtle populations and support healthy population growth and expansion within the species’ range. The primary goal of this three-year Program Action Plan is to prevent the Western Pond Turtle from being added to the Federal Endangered Species List in 2020. To do this, actions in this plan support the assessment of Western Pond Turtle populations and their threats, engage the public, build public and combined stakeholder efforts and support works that increase the number of turtles living in natural areas in the species range. While there is no specific number of turtles that will prevent listing, a well-developed plan and expanding turtle populations may help meet this goal. Photo by Marianne Hale 1 Table of Contents Plan Section Pages Background 3 Conservation Target 3 Program Operational Structure 4 Program Partners 5 Status of Taxa Within AZA Community 6 AZA Public Engagement Activities 7 Existing Action Plans and Historical Actions 7-8 Potential Connections to Other Programs 8-9 Species Status 9 Threats 9 Strategies Overview 10 Literature Cited 11 Strategic Objectives 12 2019 through 2021 SAFE Strategy Actions 13-24 2 Background The Western Pond Turtle species complex (Actinemys or Emys [formerly Clemmys] marmorata and Actinemys or Emys pallida; Crother 2017) is the only native freshwater turtle throughout most of its range. Formerly abundant, the turtles are now declining in many parts of the range which extends from north Western Baja California, Mexico, north through California, Western Nevada, and Oregon to the Puget Sound region of Washington. It is restricted to areas west of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Mountains with a few exceptions. Historically, the turtle was also found in British Columbia, Canada but has not been seen there since 1959. Western Pond Turtles (WPT) are of conservation concern throughout their range (Bury et al. 2012). Declines of WPT have been most severe in the northern and southern parts of the range, specifically in WA, southern CA, and Baja CA (Bury et al. 2012). The WPT is particularly vulnerable to habitat loss and fragmentation due to its extensive use of both upland terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Other threats include predation, pollution, competition with non-native turtle species, disease, human disturbance, road mortality, and illegal collection. In the late 1800s, the turtle was highly exploited as a food source for the growing population of the American West. Conservation Target: Both recognized species of Western Pond Turtle are the conservation targets for this plan. WPT is identified as a Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) in the State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) of four participating states (WA, OR, CA, NV), and is under review for federal listing by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The WPT is State Endangered in WA, State Sensitive-Critical in OR, a Species of Conservation Priority in Nevada, and a Species of Special Concern (SSC) in CA. Because the turtle is vulnerable to numerous threats, conservation needs for WPTs are different depending on location with projects addressing the highest priority actions in each region identified in the 2015 WPT Conservation Action Plan (CAP; AZA 2015). Both species share IUCN Conservation Status Vulnerable (IUCN 2019). Map of current range of the Northwestern Pond Turtle and the Southwestern Pond Turtle 3 Program Operational Structure Program Leader: Jason Watters, Ph.D, San Francisco Zoological Society (415) 213-8128; [email protected] Vice Program Leader: Jessie Bushell, M.S. San Francisco Zoological Society (415) 753-7080, Ext. 7079; [email protected] Public Engagement Subcommittee Lead: Jessica Moore, Northwest Trek (360) 832-7160; [email protected] Health Team Subcommittee Lead: Bobbi Miller, Woodland Park Zoo (206) 548-2621; [email protected] Additional Steering Committee Members: David Shepherdson, Ph.D, Oregon Zoo (513) 220-5765; [email protected] Blair Bazdarich, San Francisco Zoological Society (415) 753-8123; [email protected] FCC Liaison: Jeff Ettling, Ph.D., Sedgwick County Zoo Chelonian TAG advisor: Michael Ogle, Knoxville Zoo Photo courtesy of National Park Service 4 Program Partners: Numerous partners have been involved with Western Pond Turtle SAFE. Western Pond Turtle was one of the original SAFE programs established by AZA in 2014. Stakeholders, including zoos, researchers and state and federal wildlife agencies met in Oakland, CA in 2015 to review threats and develop an action plan for the species. Initial Program Partners present at Oakland Meeting AECOM Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) California Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservacion de Fauna del Noroeste (CDFW) Department of Defense, Naval Facilities IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Engineering Command SW (DOD) Group IUCN SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Knoxville Zoo Specialist Group Oakland Zoo Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Oregon Wildlife Institute Oregon Zoo San Diego Zoo Global (SDZG) San Francisco Zoological Society San Jose State University (SJSU) Sonoma State University (SSU) The Wildlife Project Turtle Conservancy US Fish and Wildlife Service` (USFWS) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Woodland Park Zoo University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) US Forest Service (USFS) US Geological Survey, Oregon (USGS-OR) US Geological Survey, California (USGS-CA) Additional Program Partners Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Park Service (NPS) Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDW) PAWS Wildlife Center Safari West Sustainability in Prisons Project and Cedar Creek Corrections Facility Shedd Aquarium University of Illinois (UI) VCA Northwest Veterinary Specialists VCA Veterinary Specialty Center of Seattle Public Engagement Partners California Department of Fish and Wildlife CuriOdyssey Living Desert Fresno Chaffee Zoo Oakland Zoo Oregon Zoo Northwest Trek Sacramento Zoo San Francisco Zoological Society Sequoia Park Zoo Turtle Conservancy 5 Range-wide Conservation Coalition Partners Bureau of Land Management California Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Defense Fauna del Noroeste A.C., Baja California Independent biologist National Park Service Nevada Department of Wildlife Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Zoo PARC San Francisco Zoological Society US Fish and Wildlife Service US Forest Service US Geological Survey Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Status of Taxa Within AZA Community The Western Pond Turtle is part of the Chelonian Taxon Advisory Group (TAG). Both species are in a Yellow Species Survival PlanTM (SSP). Studbooks separate individuals into the two current recognized species based upon genetic profiles. Currently, 25 institutions participate in the SSP. Species Number of Individuals Number of SSP Holders Northern 68 16 Southern 57 15 Unknown 32 7 The Western Pond Turtle is relatively easy to care for and a fairly active, charismatic species. Injured or rehabilitated or captive born individuals that cannot be released back to their native areas may become good animal ambassadors for zoo and aquarium visitors. Exhibits with these animals can be effective at introducing people to conservation messaging and to helping zoo-goers understand actions they might be able to take to help in conserving the species and the habitats they rely on. For AZA organizations in WPT range states, local conservation messaging may be enhanced at exhibits housing the species. Additionally, because of the turtle’s aquatic nature, other conservation messaging such as water resource conservation and wetland restoration can be added to outreach programs that use the turtle to stimulate interest. 6 Photo by Marianne Hale AZA Public Engagement Activities to Date Under the previous program action plan, WPT SAFE completed several public engagement activities. First, the foundation was laid for developing a public engagement plan with the implementation of a public engagement subcommittee and the appointment of a leader to that subgroup. The group surveyed WPT SAFE partners to determine best techniques for messaging to a zoo and aquarium audience and also to look for brief statements that SAFE partners believe to be effective in stimulating conservation action. The respondents to this survey felt that talking to people in person is one of the most effective means to communicate conservation messages about WPT. But further research should help to determine how best to develop an effective message. The WPT SAFE Public Engagement team has also developed materials that can be used for educational outreach at partner organizations including a low-cost informational poster. Existing Action Plans and Historical Actions by AZA organizations in WPT Conservation As Western Pond Turtles are currently not listed as a federally endangered species in the US, there is no active recovery plan for the species. Nevertheless, numerous actions are in place and developing that are aimed at supporting the turtles and their habitat needs. Indeed, a Range Wide Conservation Coalition is a group of stakeholders collaboratively developing a conservation plan for the turtles. This plan will be a major factor in determining whether the turtles are listed. The result of the Oakland meeting was a Conservation Action Plan that described the group’s agreed- upon key projects and communication needs. These projects described
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Life History Account for Western Pond Turtle
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group WESTERN POND TURTLE Actinemys marmorata Family: EMYDIDAE Order: TESTUDINES Class: REPTILIA R004 Written by: S. Morey Reviewed by: T. Papenfuss Edited by: R. Duke Updated by: CWHR Program Staff, March 2000 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The western pond turtle is uncommon to common in suitable aquatic habitat throughout California, west of the Sierra-Cascade crest and absent from desert regions, except in the Mojave Desert along the Mojave River and its tributaries. Elevation range extends from near sea level to 1430 m (4690 ft) (Jennings and Hayes 1994). Associated with permanent or nearly permanent water in a wide variety of habitat types. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: This species is considered omnivorous. Aquatic plant material, including pond lilies, beetles and a variety of aquatic invertebrates as well as fishes, frogs, and even carrion have been reported among their food (Stebbins 1972, Nussbaum et al. 1983). Cover: Pond turtles require basking sites such as partially submerged logs, rocks, mats of floating vegetation, or open mud banks. Turtles slip from basking sites to underwater retreats at the approach of humans or potential predators. Hibernation in colder areas is passed underwater in bottom mud. Reproduction: Storer (1930) suggested that two distinct habitats may be used for oviposition. Along large slow-moving streams, eggs are deposited in nests constructed in sandy banks. Along foothill streams, females may climb hillsides, sometimes moving considerable distances to find a suitable nest site. Nussbaum et al. (1983) reports a nest in a clover field 100 m (325 ft) from water.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Generic Concepts for Blanding's, Pacific and European
    Zootaxa 2791: 41–53 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Competing generic concepts for Blanding’s, Pacific and European pond turtles (Emydoidea, Actinemys and Emys)—Which is best? UWE FRITZ1,3, CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT1 & CARL H. ERNST2 1Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, D-01109 Dresden, Germany 2Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, MRC 162, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We review competing taxonomic classifications and hypotheses for the phylogeny of emydine turtles. The formerly rec- ognized genus Clemmys sensu lato clearly is paraphyletic. Two of its former species, now Glyptemys insculpta and G. muhlenbergii, constitute a well-supported basal clade within the Emydinae. However, the phylogenetic position of the oth- er two species traditionally placed in Clemmys remains controversial. Mitochondrial data suggest a clade embracing Actinemys (formerly Clemmys) marmorata, Emydoidea and Emys and as its sister either another clade (Clemmys guttata + Terrapene) or Terrapene alone. In contrast, nuclear genomic data yield conflicting results, depending on which genes are used. Either Clemmys guttata is revealed as sister to ((Emydoidea + Emys) + Actinemys) + Terrapene or Clemmys gut- tata is sister to Actinemys marmorata and these two species together are the sister group of (Emydoidea + Emys); Terra- pene appears then as sister to (Actinemys marmorata + Clemmys guttata) + (Emydoidea + Emys). The contradictory branching patterns depending from the selected loci are suggestive of lineage sorting problems. Ignoring the unclear phy- logenetic position of Actinemys marmorata, one recently proposed classification scheme placed Actinemys marmorata, Emydoidea blandingii, Emys orbicularis, and Emys trinacris in one genus (Emys), while another classification scheme treats Actinemys, Emydoidea, and Emys as distinct genera.
    [Show full text]
  • File No. 19092 Item No
    File No. 19092 Item No. 6 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE AGENDA PACKET CONTENTS LIST Compliance and Amendments Committee Date: October 27, 2020 Petition/Complaint Page: \ <{\ Memorandum - Deputy City Attorney Page:_'.( tJ Petitioner/Complainant Supporting ~ Page: Documents \~? J RespondenfsResponse Page: iov Public Correspondence Page:_~ ·~ Order of Determination Page:J_~ D Minutes Page:_._ D Administrator's Report Page:_ D No Attachments OTHER D D D D D D D D D Completed by:._--"C-'.-. -=L~eg-'-'e'-'-r ______Date 10/22/20 *An asterisked item represents the cover sheet to a document that exceeds 25 pages. The complete document is in the file. P177 City Hall 1 Dr Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 TASK FORCE Tel. No. (415) 554-7724 Fax No. (415) 554-7854 TTD/TTYNo. (415) 554-5227 ORDER OF DETERMINATION · March 28, 2020 DATE DECISION ISSUED January 21, 2020 CASE TITLE - Justin Barker v. San Francisco Zoo (File No. 19092) FACTS OF THE CASE The following petition/complaint was filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF): File No. 19092: Complaint filed by Justin Barker against the San Francisco Zoo for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner. HEARING ON THE COMPLAINT On October 22, 2019, Information Technology Committee, acting in its capacity to hear petitions/complaints heard the matter. Justin Barker (Petitioner), provided a summary of the complaint and requested the Committee to find a violation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys
    Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Steven P. Krichbaum May 2018 © 2018 Steven P. Krichbaum. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians by STEVEN P. KRICHBAUM has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Willem Roosenburg Professor of Biological Sciences Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract KRICHBAUM, STEVEN P., Ph.D., May 2018, Biological Sciences Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians Director of Dissertation: Willem Roosenburg My study presents information on summer use of terrestrial habitat by IUCN “endangered” North American Wood Turtles (Glyptemys insculpta), sampled over four years at two forested montane sites on the southern periphery of the species’ range in the central Appalachians of Virginia (VA) and West Virginia (WV) USA. The two sites differ in topography, stream size, elevation, and forest composition and structure. I obtained location points for individual turtles during the summer, the period of their most extensive terrestrial roaming. Structural, compositional, and topographical habitat features were measured, counted, or characterized on the ground (e.g., number of canopy trees and identification of herbaceous taxa present) at Wood Turtle locations as well as at paired random points located 23-300m away from each particular turtle location.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Reciprocal List
    RECIPRICAL ZOOS. Each zoo sets their own guidelines for the quantity and ages admitted per card. Zoos can revoke privileges at any time without notice. RECIP 2006 STATE ZOO 50% CANADA Riverview Park & Zoo 50% CANADA Toronto Zoo 50% CANADA Valley Zoo 50% Alabama Birmingham Zoo NO Alabama Montgomery Zoo NO Arizona Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum NO Arizona Navajo Nation Zoo & Botanical Park 50% Arizona Phoenix Zoo 50% Arizona Reid Park Zoo NO Arizona Wildlife World Zoo 50% Arkansas Little Rock Zoo NO BE Bermuda Aquarium, Museum & Zoo NO BR Vancouver Aquarium NO California Academy Of Sciences 50% California Applegate Park Zoo 50% California Aquarium Of The Bay NO California Aquarium Of The Pacific NO California Birch Aquarium At Scripps 50% California Cabrillo Marine Aquarium 50% California Chaffee Zoo 50% California Charles Paddock Zoo 50% California Coyote Point Museum 50% California Happy Hollow Park & Zoo NO California Living Desert 50% California Los Angeles Zoo 50% California Micke Grove Zoo NO California Monterey Bay Aquarium 50% California Moonridge Zoo 50% California Oakland Zoo 50% California Orange County Zoo 50% California Sacramento Zoo NO California Safari West NO California San Diego Wild Animal Park NO California San Diego Zoo 50% California San Francisco Zoo 50% California Santa Ana Zoo 50% California Santa Barbara Zoo NO California Seaworld San Diego 50% California Sequoia Park Zoo NO California Six Flags Marine World NO California Steinhart Aquarium NO CANADA Calgary Zoo 50% Colorado Butterfly Pavilion NO Colorado Cheyenne
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys for Western Pond Turtle Actinemys Marmorata on The
    Surveys for Western pond turtle Actinemys marmorata On the Siuslaw National Forest Cynthia G. Burns, Wildlife Biologist U. S. Forest Service Siuslaw National Forest October 29, 2010 SUMMARY Surveys were contracted to establish presence of the western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata) on lands within or adjacent to the Siuslaw National Forest’s (SNF) Hebo and Central Coast/ODNRA (Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area) Ranger Districts during the summer of 2010. Portions of 5 rivers and 1 lake were surveyed on or near the Central Coast/Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area (ODNRA) Ranger District and 3 lakes were surveyed on the Hebo District. Surveys were conducted by kayak and at fixed points. Two Red-eared Sliders Trachemys scripta elegans were confirmed during contracted surveys. No western pond turtles were found. Habitat and invasive species data were also collected as part of the survey effort. INTRODUCTION The western pond turtle occurs along the Pacific states from Baja California to Puget Sound of Washington. Western pond turtles are listed as endangered in Washington, sensitive critical in Oregon and are a species of concern in Region 6 of the Forest Service (WA & OR). It was proposed for Federal listing in 1991 but was precluded due to lack of supporting evidence on its population trends. In 2010 the Siuslaw National Forest continued surveys of lands within or adjacent to its boundaries in an effort to determine where individuals or populations may still exist. In Oregon, the western pond turtle occurs primarily within the drainages of the Willamette, Umpqua, Rogue and Klamath Rivers but has also been documented in lowland aquatic habitats throughout western Oregon (Rosenberg, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • News Release for Immediate Release
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Press Contacts: Dean Noble, 805 962-5339, [email protected] Julia McHugh 805 569-3303, [email protected] SANTA BARBARA ZOO OPEN & FREE TODAY (THURSDAY) 10 A.M. TO 3 P.M., REGULAR HOURS & ADMISSIONS RESUME FRIDAY, DEC. 22; OPEN CHRISTMAS & NEW YEARS Evacuation Orders Lifted; Animals on View; Ash Cleanup Continues Guests Should Check Air Quality Warnings, Take Precautions Zoo Camp Set for Next Week – December 26 to 29 Thursday & Friday: Indoor Fun for Kids in Discovery Pavilion Regular Hours 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Begin Friday (Dec. 22) Donations to Emergency Fund can be Made Online Santa Barbara, CA, December 21, 2017 – After a five-day closure due to the Thomas Fire, the Santa Barbara Zoo reopens today (Dec. 21) from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. with free admission, parking, Zoo Train rides, giraffe feeding and more. All evacuation orders have been lifted in Santa Barbara County. Regular Zoo admission hours and admission prices resume on Friday, December 22. Most animals are on view (see below). The popular indoor activities for kids in the Zoo’s Discovery Pavilion, which were held last week, continue on Thursday and Friday only. Zoo Camp will take place next week as scheduled (see below). The Zoo is open Christmas Eve and Day (December 24 and 25), from 10 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.; and has full hours on both New Year’s Eve and Day. Details are on the Zoo’s website (www.sbzoo.org) and Facebook page (www.facebook.com/santabarbarazoo).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment for the Western Pond Turtle Final Report
    Assessment for the Western Pond Turtle Final Report Client: United States Fish and Wildlife Service Primary Advisor: Brad Shaffer Secondary Advisor: Peter Scott Team Members: Zachary Devereux Hogan Fenster Stephanie Manzo Thomas Morgan Griffin Nicholson Delacey Rodriguez Bianca Sanchez University of California, Los Angeles Executive Summary Western Pond Turtle Report June 2019 The western pond turtle (WPT), recently separated into two species, is a candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act. To assess the current status of both species, we conducted a risk assessment and analysis of historical, current, and future conditions. Background This assessment for the WPT compiles the best available literature, scientific information, museum data, and population viability analyses to characterize the biological status of the two species: Emys (Actinemys) pallida and Emys (Actinemys) marmorata. The goal of this assessment is to inform the listing decision for the two species under the federal Endangered Species Act, and to act as a source of information for future conservation efforts. Species Biology and Needs The WPT occurs in a variety of semi-aquatic habitats ranging from lakes, rivers, and streams to man-made channels, agricultural ponds, and sewage treatment ponds. Emys pallida can be found from northern Baja California, Mexico to the southern San Francisco Bay area along the coast and inland deserts. It can be found along the Southern Coast Ranges and the western parts of the San Joaquin Valley. Emys marmorata can be found from the San Francisco bay area north to Washington state and south along the eastern side of the San Joaquin Valley. The WPT is a medium sized pond turtle that has a maximum life span of about 45 years (Holland 1994, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Potential Injury and Mortality in Actinemys
    Western Wildlife 4:81–85 • 2017 Submitted: 6 March 2017; Accepted: 19 October 2017. NOTES POTENTIAL INJURY AND MORTALITY IN ACTINEMYS (EMYS) PALLIDA DURING RESTORATION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES JEFF A. ALVAREZ1,5, GARY A. KITTLESON2, KELLY DAVIDSON3, AND LOUISA M. ASSEO4 1The Wildlife Project, P.O. Box 188888, Sacramento, California 95818 2Kittleson Environmental Consulting, 3284 Malibu Drive, Santa Cruz, California 95062 3Mt. View Sanitary District, P.O. Box 2757, Martinez, California 94553 4Oasis Veterinary Hospital, 6635 Alhambra Avenue, Suite 100, Martinez, California 94553 5Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—Losses of uncommon or declining species are frequently mitigated through habitat restoration, enhancement, management, and/or replacement. These actions require maintenance that is seldom considered a concern for the species being managed. On two sites in central California, both of which were undergoing habitat management activities in support of southwestern pond turtle populations, maintenance activities, especially mowing, appeared to have an unanticipated negative impact on two life stages of this at-risk species. At both sites, turtles were either killed or seriously injured when mowing occurred in uplands occupied by turtle nests or adults turtles. Minor adjustments to equipment may reduce or eliminate turtle injury or mortality on sites where maintenance is required. Key Words.—conservation; declining; management; mowing; risk; Southwestern Pond Turtle The Western Pond Turtle (Actinemys marmorata) is compliance with the California Environmental Quality a species of special concern in California, a critically Act of 1970. While conducting restoration and habitat sensitive species in Oregon, and an endangered species maintenance work on two sites in coastal California, in Washington State (Washington Department of Fish we documented two instances in which Southwestern and Wildlife 1993; Oregon Department of Fish and Pond Turtles were either killed or injured by tow-behind Wildlife 2008; Thompson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Actinemys Marmorata) in Coastal Streams of Central California
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 3(2):143-148 Submitted: 16 October 2007; Accepted: 16 July 2008. REPRODUCTION OF PACIFIC POND TURTLES (ACTINEMYS MARMORATA) IN COASTAL STREAMS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 NORMAN J. SCOTT , GALEN B. RATHBUN , THOMAS G. MURPHEY , MARGARET B. HARKER 1U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Piedras Blancas Field Station, Post Office Box 70, San Simeon, California 93452, USA 2Corresponding Author/Present Address: Research Associate, Smithsonian Institution, c/o P.O. Box 307, Creston, California 93432, USA, e-mail: [email protected] 3Present Address: California Academy of Sciences (San Francisco), c/o P.O. Box 202, Cambria, California 93428-0202, USA, e- mail: [email protected] 4Present Address: U.S. Forest Service, 1616 Carlotti Drive, Santa Maria, California 93454, USA, e-mail: [email protected] 5Present Address: 1130 E Clarke 150-#243, Santa Maria, California 93455, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—We studied the reproduction of Pacific Pond Turtles, Actinemys marmorata, in four coastal creeks in central California. Ovigerous females had carapace lengths (CL) between 140 mm and 164 mm ( = 152 mm). Oviposition occurred from late April to mid-July. The number of eggs in 97 clutches varied between three and eight ( = 5.7), and 39 females laid 0-2 ( = 1.3) clutches/yr. The average size of the first clutch was larger than the second, but the number of clutches laid one year did not affect the number laid the next year. Mean annual egg production per female was 7.2 eggs. The female pond turtles reported here have the largest minimum size at maturity (140 mm) of any population studied to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Emydoidea, Actinemys and Emys)—Which Is Best?
    Zootaxa 2791: 41–53 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Competing generic concepts for Blanding’s, Pacific and European pond turtles (Emydoidea, Actinemys and Emys)—Which is best? UWE FRITZ1,3, CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT1 & CARL H. ERNST2 1Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, D-01109 Dresden, Germany 2Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, MRC 162, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We review competing taxonomic classifications and hypotheses for the phylogeny of emydine turtles. The formerly rec- ognized genus Clemmys sensu lato clearly is paraphyletic. Two of its former species, now Glyptemys insculpta and G. muhlenbergii, constitute a well-supported basal clade within the Emydinae. However, the phylogenetic position of the oth- er two species traditionally placed in Clemmys remains controversial. Mitochondrial data suggest a clade embracing Actinemys (formerly Clemmys) marmorata, Emydoidea and Emys and as its sister either another clade (Clemmys guttata + Terrapene) or Terrapene alone. In contrast, nuclear genomic data yield conflicting results, depending on which genes are used. Either Clemmys guttata is revealed as sister to ((Emydoidea + Emys) + Actinemys) + Terrapene or Clemmys gut- tata is sister to Actinemys marmorata and these two species together are the sister group of (Emydoidea + Emys); Terra- pene appears then as sister to (Actinemys marmorata + Clemmys guttata) + (Emydoidea + Emys). The contradictory branching patterns depending from the selected loci are suggestive of lineage sorting problems. Ignoring the unclear phy- logenetic position of Actinemys marmorata, one recently proposed classification scheme placed Actinemys marmorata, Emydoidea blandingii, Emys orbicularis, and Emys trinacris in one genus (Emys), while another classification scheme treats Actinemys, Emydoidea, and Emys as distinct genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Western Pond Turtles (Actinemys
    Conservation of Western Pond Turtles (Actinemys marmorata) on the Lower American River Milo William Kovet Sr. ENVS 190; Senior Thesis California State University, Sacramento November 14, 2018 1 Table of Contents: Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………pg. 3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….pg. 4 Study Area……………………..……………………………………………………………...pg. 4 Background…………………………………………………………………………………. pg. 6 Classification.…………………………………………………………………………pg. 6 Description……………………………………………………………………………pg. 7 Diet……………………………………………………………………………………pg. 9 Habitat………………………………………………………………………………………. pg. 9 Aquatic Habitat………………………………………………………………………. pg. 9 Basking……………………………………………………………………………….pg.11 Terrestrial Habitat………………………………………….…………………….......pg. 13 Overwintering………..…………………………………………………………........pg. 13 Nesting………..………………………………………………………………….......pg. 14 Clutch Size..…..…………………………………………………………….……......pg. 15 Survival and Recruitment………………………………………………………………….pg. 16 Predators…………………………………………………………….……………….pg. 16 Hatchling Survival………………………………………………….………………..pg. 17 Other Threats……………………………………………………………………………….pg. 19 Habitat Loss…………………………………………………………….……………pg. 19 Disease………………………………………………………………….……………pg. 19 Road Mortality…………………………………………………………….…………pg. 20 Invasive species……………………………………………………………………...pg. 20 Recreational disturbance………………………………………………………….….pg. 22 Climate Change………………………………………………………………………pg.23 Conservation Status……………………………………………………………………...…pg. 24 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………..pg. 26 Visual Encounter Surveys …………………………………………...……………...pg.
    [Show full text]