Cannington Flood Defence Scheme Cannington Somerset Archaeological Evaluation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cannington Flood Defence Scheme Cannington Somerset Archaeological Evaluation Cannington Flood Defence Scheme Cannington Somerset Archaeological Evaluation for Environment Agency CA Project: 4591 CA Report: 13617 November 2013 Cannington Flood Defence Scheme Cannington Somerset Archaeological Evaluation CA Project: 4591 CA Report: 13617 prepared by Steven Sheldon, Project Officer date 20 November 2013 checked by Richard Young, Project Manager date 25 November 2013 approved by Laurent Coleman, Principle Project Manager signed date 26 November 2013 issue 01 This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology Cirencester Milton Keynes Andover Building 11 Unit 4 Stanley House Kemble Enterprise Park Cromwell Business Centre Walworth Road Kemble, Cirencester Howard Way, Newport Pagnell Andover, Hampshire Gloucestershire, GL7 6BQ MK16 9QS SP10 5LH t. 01285 771022 t. 01908 218320 t. 01264 347630 f. 01285 771033 e. [email protected] © Cotswold Archaeology Cannington Flood Defence Scheme, Cannington, Somerset: Archaeological Evaluation CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 4 The site .............................................................................................................. 4 Archaeological background ................................................................................ 5 Archaeological objectives ................................................................................... 6 Methodology....................................................................................................... 7 2. RESULTS (FIGS 2-14) ....................................................................................... 8 The finds ............................................................................................................ 11 3. DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................... 12 4. CA PROJECT TEAM .......................................................................................... 14 5. REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 14 APPENDIX A: CONTEXT DESCRIPTIONS .................................................................... 17 APPENDIX B: THE FINDS .............................................................................................. 21 APPENDIX C: OASIS REPORT FORM .......................................................................... 22 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Fig. 1 Site location plan (1:25,000) Fig. 2 Trench location plan, showing geophysical survey results (1:4000) Fig. 3 Trenches 1 to 6, showing archaeological features and geophysical survey results (1:1000) Fig. 4 Trenches 6 to 12, showing archaeological features and geophysical survey results (1:1000) Fig. 5 Trenches 12 to 17, showing archaeological features and geophysical survey results (1:1000) Fig. 6 Trench 1: plan, section and photograph Fig. 7 Trench 2: plan, section and photograph Fig. 8 Trench 5: plan, section and photograph Fig. 9 Trench 6: plan, section and photograph Fig. 10 Trench 8: plan, section and photograph Fig. 11 Trench 9: plan, section and photograph 1 © Cotswold Archaeology Cannington Flood Defence Scheme, Cannington, Somerset: Archaeological Evaluation Fig. 12 Trench 11: plan, section and photograph Fig. 13 Trench 12: plan, section and photograph Fig. 14 Trench 14: plan, section and photograph Fig. 15 Trench 15: plan, section and photograph Fig. 16 Trench 16: plan, section and photograph Fig. 17 Trench 17: plan, section and photograph 2 © Cotswold Archaeology Cannington Flood Defence Scheme, Cannington, Somerset: Archaeological Evaluation SUMMARY Project Name: Cannington Flood Defence Scheme Location: Cannington, Somerset NGR: ST 25391 38920 Type: Evaluation Date: 21-29 October 2013 Location of Archive: To be deposited with Somerset County Museum Site Code: CFDS 13 An archaeological evaluation was undertaken by Cotswold Archaeology in October 2013 at Cannington Flood Defence Scheme, Cannington, Somerset. Seventeen trenches were excavated. The evaluation identified a number of archaeological features across the site; these comprised ditches and a single pit or posthole. These features generally correlated well with the results of a preceding geophysical survey. A curving ditch, identified in the eastern part of site, may be prehistoric in date and could represent the remains of a ring ditch, circular drip gully or stock enclosure associated with possible funerary or settlement activity. However, the limited exposure of this feature along with a lack of dating evidence and associated features makes the exact date and function of this ditch unclear at present. A number of ditches, identified in the central part of site, appear to confirm the presence of a postulated Roman ladder settlement previously identified by the geophysical survey. Pottery ranging in date from the Late Iron Age/ 1st century AD to the 2nd to 4th-century AD was recovered from the fills of these ditches. Ditches of post-medieval date were identified in two trenches and would appear to relate to agricultural activity and/or land division. Undated ditches were identified in six trenches. The exact function of these features remains unclear although they are likely to relate to land management or drainage. An undated pit/posthole was identified in Trench 15. However, due to its isolated nature the exact function of this feature remains unclear. 3 © Cotswold Archaeology Cannington Flood Defence Scheme, Cannington, Somerset: Archaeological Evaluation 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In October 2013 Cotswold Archaeology (CA) carried out an archaeological evaluation for the Environment Agency at Cannington Flood Defence Scheme, Cannington, Somerset (centred at NGR: ST 25391 38920; Fig. 1). An archaeological evaluation of the site was recommended by Dr. Richard Brunning, Senior Levels and Moors Heritage Officer, Somerset County Council Heritage Service, Somerset County Council (SCC) prior to the commencement of groundworks associated with the construction of a flood relief channel to the south of Cannington. 1.2 The evaluation was carried out in accordance with a Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) produced by CA (2013) and approved by Dr. Brunning. The fieldwork also followed the Standard and guidance for archaeological field evaluation (IfA 2009), the Heritage Service Archaeological Handbook (SCC 2009), the Management of Archaeological Projects 2 (English Heritage 1991) and the Management of Research Projects in the Historic Environment (MORPHE): Project Manager’s Guide (EH 2006). It was monitored by Dr. Brunning, including a site visit on 25 October 2013. The site 1.3 The proposed development area comprises agricultural land, bounded to the north, east and west by the A39 and to the south by further agricultural land. The trenches were target on the location of a proposed flood defence channel and bund. The site lies at approximately 19m AOD, with the ground level dropping away to the east. 1.4 The underlying bedrock geology of the area is mapped as Mercia mudstone of the Triassic period (BGS 2013). Borehole investigations in the northern part of the site, adjacent to the A39, revealed the natural mudstone at a depth of between 1.4m and 1.65m below present ground level (bpgl). This was sealed by alluvial deposits measuring between 0.6m to 0.95m in thickness (WYG 2013). The natural substrate, comprising mid red brown sandy gravel with frequent patches of light brown silty sand, was identified in all of the excavated trenches. 4 © Cotswold Archaeology Cannington Flood Defence Scheme, Cannington, Somerset: Archaeological Evaluation Archaeological background 1.5 Few artefacts of early prehistoric date have been found within the vicinity of the site, consisting of a small collection of Mesolithic flints allegedly found near Brymore School (HER 10296). A tanged bronze knife was also found at Cynwit Castle to the north (HER 16250). Immediately to the north of the current site a large sherd of Bronze Age pottery was recovered from the subsoil during trial trenching undertaken by CA in 2010 (CA 2010a). 1.6 1.5km to the north of the site lies the Scheduled Iron Age hill fort of Cynwit Castle (HER 10439), which has been investigated several times in the last hundred years (AMEC 2010). An associated extra-mural farmstead has also been excavated to the north of the Castle (HER 10302), and a further Scheduled Iron Age settlement and related field system lies to the south-east of the hill fort. 1.7 Evidence for Roman occupation has been found 1.5km to the north of the site. A layer of Roman material and a possible Roman structure were uncovered during an excavation of Cynwit Castle (HER 12770) suggesting that the hillfort had been reoccupied during the Roman period. The site of a probable Roman settlement also lies 1.5km to the south-west of the study area at Ashford Farm (NMR 191082). 1.8 A large early Christian inhumation cemetery (HER 10503) dating from the Late Roman to the Early Medieval period was identified at Cannington Park Quarry 1.5km to the north of the site. It was in use from AD 350-800,
Recommended publications
  • North and Mid Somerset CFMP
    ` Parrett Catchment Flood Management Plan Consultation Draft (v5) (March 2008) We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 © Environment Agency March 2008 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency Parrett Catchment Flood Management Plan – Consultation Draft (Mar 2008) Document issue history ISSUE BOX Issue date Version Status Revisions Originated Checked Approved Issued to by by by 15 Nov 07 1 Draft JM/JK/JT JM KT/RR 13 Dec 07 2 Draft v2 Response to JM/JK/JT JM/KT KT/RR Regional QRP 4 Feb 08 3 Draft v3 Action Plan JM/JK/JT JM KT/RR & Other Revisions 12 Feb 08 4 Draft v4 Minor JM JM KT/RR Revisions 20 Mar 08 5 Draft v5 Minor JM/JK/JT JM/KT Public consultation Revisions Consultation Contact details The Parrett CFMP will be reviewed within the next 5 to 6 years. Any comments collated during this period will be considered at the time of review. Any comments should be addressed to: Ken Tatem Regional strategic and Development Planning Environment Agency Rivers House East Quay Bridgwater Somerset TA6 4YS or send an email to: [email protected] Environment Agency Parrett Catchment Flood Management Plan – Consultation Draft (Mar 2008) Foreword Parrett DRAFT Catchment Flood Management Plan I am pleased to introduce the draft Parrett Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP).
    [Show full text]
  • Cannington Local Visual Landscape Study
    CANNINGTON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2016-2032 APPENDIX 2: CANNINGTON LOCAL VISUAL LANDSCAPE STUDY GUIDING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, REGENERATION AND CONSERVATION OF CANNINGTON Produced on behalf of Cannington Parish Council by Rob Morgan June 2019 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 2. Consultation ............................................................................................... 4 3. Ridgeline .................................................................................................... 6 4. North-western slopes ................................................................................. 8 5. Western Approaches ................................................................................ 11 6. Summary of Views of Particular Importance ............................................ 15 7. Conclusions .............................................................................................. 16 Appendix A – Local Plan Consultation Letter ........................................................ 16 Appendix B – Extract from SDC Local Plan 2011 – 2032, page 170 ....................... 20 1. Introduction 1.1. The village of Cannington has developed at the foot of an escarpment of land which separates the rural settlement from the flood plain of the River Parrett to the north. While there have been some linear intrusions up the slope, following the line of the roads at Rodway and Chads Hill, the vast majority of the village is located around
    [Show full text]
  • (Entomological Section. Away in Khaki
    The Entomological Section. xxxiii except three small pieces of Romanesque pattern, in type similar to those previously discovered. 4. Iron. Two parts of keys, much corroded, have been found, and some other fragments of iron too much decayed to be identified. 5. Bronze. A of of molten bronze quantity fragments ; also a piece which appears to be a chip from a bell, about 3 x 2 x lin. Nearly all this bronze was found on the floor level of the Dorter sub-vault in the compartment furthest south adjoining the east wall of the Refectory. Here was found also much of the lead and evidence of cavities for fires in the floor level, which may have been used for melting metals after the dissolution of the Abbey. 6. Lead. A number of fragments of windows and molten lead also a worked of lattice about the size ; finely piece of a lozenge-shaped window quarry. (Specimens of similar work " in windows at Warwick are figured in Lewis Day's Windows," 1909, p. 301). 7. Coins. Four of bronze. 8. Kitchen Remains. In the layer of dark clay imme- diately underlying the floor of the Dorter sub-vault and ex- tending beyond the excavations a great number of animal bones and other kitchen refuse were found. The bones have yet to be identified. Amongst the fish remains may be noted a vertebra of a porpoise, also mussel and periwinkle shells. The were numerous these remains oyster-shells very ; were without doubt deposited here before the present buildings were erected. (Entomological Section. President Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Report 2015
    Catchment report 2015 www.wessexwater.co.uk Introduction Welcome to the first edition of our annual catchment report. In the past water authorities organised themselves according to river catchments and often controlled land use around water sources to prevent contamination of groundwater. However, after privatisation the focus shifted to upgrading water and sewage treatment infrastructure to provide greater guarantees that drinking water and effluent standards would be met within short timescales. While major improvements were made to the quality of our drinking water and treated effluent, they came at a high price in terms of capital and operational costs such as additional treatment chemicals and an increased carbon footprint, due to the energy used. More recently, there has been an upsurge in interest in catchment management as a less resource-intensive way to protect groundwater, streams and rivers. Since 2005 we have been carrying out catchment work in cooperation with farmers to optimise nutrient and pesticide inputs to land. This often means dealing with the causes of problems by looking at land use, management practices and even the behaviour of individuals. Addressing the issue at source is much more sustainable than investing in additional water treatment that is expensive to build and operate and leaves the problem in the environment. At the same time we have been amassing data on the condition of the rivers and estuaries in our region to ensure that any subsequent investment is proportional and based on solid evidence. We have also been working on different ways to engage with the public and influence behaviour to help protect water supplies and sewers and, in turn, the water environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pawlett Hams Water Supply Pipeline Project 2017 Parrett Internal Drainage Board Environmental Report
    Parrett Internal Drainage Board Pawlett Hams supply pipeline project 2017 Environmental Report Pawlett Hams Water Supply Pipeline Project 2017 Parrett Internal Drainage Board Environmental Report - including Environmental Impact, Habitats Regulations and Water Framework Directive Assessments Philip Brewin – Somerset Drainage Boards Consortium Ecologist 21st April 2017 Version 3 Pawlett Hams supply pipeline failure after embankment slip in Oct 2015 Page 1 Parrett Internal Drainage Board Pawlett Hams supply pipeline project 2017 Environmental Report Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 2 Economic case and outcome measures ...................................................................... 4 3 Links to strategies and other schemes ....................................................................... 4 3.1 Water Level Management Plans ................................................................................ 4 3.2 Flood and coastal risk management of the Parrett Estuary ........................................ 4 4 Preferred option ............................................................................................................ 5 5 Alternative options ...................................................................................................... 11 5.1 Do nothing ................................................................................................................11 5.2 Do minimum ..............................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley Point C Consent Order Application
    Development Hinkley Point C Consent Order Application Compulsory Purchase Information Doc Ref 6.1 October 2011 Statement of Reasons Any plans, drawings and materials submitted by EDF Energy as part of the Application to the Infrastructure Planning Commission are protected by copyright. You may only use this material (including taking copies of it) in order to (1) inspect those plans, drawings and materials at a more convenient time or place; or (2) to facilitate the exercise of a right to participate in the pre-examination or examination stages of the Application which is available under the Planning Act 2008 and related regulations. Further copies must not be taken without the prior permission of EDF Energy. edfenergy.com EDF Energy Ltd 40 Grosvenor Place London SW1X 7EN. Registered in England & Wales. Company registration number 2366852. © Copyright EDF Energy All rights reserved 2011. The official emblems of the London 2012 Games are © 2007 The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Ltd. All rights reserved. Statement of Reasons (Document 6.1) Regulation 5(2)(h) NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................3 1.1 The Application................................................................................................................3 1.2 The Purpose of the Statement of Reasons......................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Cannington Neighbourhood Plan 2016-2032
    CANNINGTON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2016-2032 REGULATION 14 (PRE-SUBMISSION) AND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION DRAFT GUIDING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, REGENERATION AND CONSERVATION OF CANNINGTON March 2021 CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD 2 2. INTRODUCTION 3 3. GLOBAL ISSUES WITH A LOCAL IMPACT 22 4. WHAT DOES THE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN AIM TO ACHIEVE? 25 5. INTRODUCTION TO POLICIES 28 6. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT 29 7. THE NATURAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT 39 8. TRANSPORT 63 9. BUSINESS & THE ECONOMY 68 10. EDUCATION & TRAINING FACILITIES 74 11. COMMUNITY PROJECTS & ASPIRATIONS 79 12 & 13. APPENDICES SEE SEPARATE FILES Photographs: we would like to thank Mr George Pope LRPS and Rose Allen for letting us use their images of Cannington. March 2021 | Cannington Neighbourhood Plan 1 1. FOREWORD 1.1 We (the Parish Council) began the journey of making a Neighbourhood Plan in 2016 with help from members of the local community who were not Parish Councillors. Since that time we held community consultation to help us understand and confirm the key issues of importance locally and sought to finalise a Plan by 2018 with 2-3 years being an average length of time that most Neighbourhood Plans seem to take to develop. During the process, we engaged consultants to help us move the Plan forward and sought the informal views of officers at Sedgemoor District Council on our draft policies in the Plan. However, with limited local volunteer, Councillor and Parish Clerk time to complete the Plan for consultation meant that we were not in a position to consult on our first full version of the Plan until the start of 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Many SPIRAEA, Z
    ROSACEA. 97 3. Bridgwater ; MelvilL Hedges on the slopes of the Blackdown hills. Roadside between Ford and Bromp- ton Ralph. 4. Brympton ; J. Sowerby. Near Chard. 6. Hedges between Chard and Winsham, rather frequent. 7. Hedge near Pen Selwood. 5. Europe and W. Asia. (Azores : Canaries). Will- komm says " Hab. sponte in Ital., Dalmat., Tauria." Koch " ex Oriente allata." England, Ireland. Not in Gloucestershire ? I do not always find it easy to distinguish Prunus Avium from P. Cerasus , and doubt much as to the value of some of the book characters. The under surface of the leaves is said to be pubescent in P. Avium, but glabrous in P. Cerasus. I find it to be much the same in both, viz. thinly hairy. Many continental authors derive a character from the petioles, say- ing of P. Avium "petioles with one or two (large) glands at the top ;" and of P. Cerasus " glands on the petioles none or mounting to the lower teeth of the leaves." I am convinced, however, that no reliance can be placed on this. Perhaps the shape of the adult leaves and the suckers of P. Cerasus afford the best characters. [P. PADUS, L. Alien ; woods, where I suspect it has always been originally planted. May. 9. Brockley Combe ; F. B. C. Clevedon ; W. E. Green. 10. St. Anne's Wood, Brislington ; T. B. Flower (Phyt. I. 68). Leigh Woods ; Swete. Roddenbury Wood, Longleat ; just within the county, probably planted ; H. F. Parsons. Europe ; N. Africa ; N. and W. Asia Himalaya. ; England (northern), Scotland, Ireland. Not in Devon, Dorset, nor Wilts.] II.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Sedgemoor District Council Strategy and Development October 2015 [email protected] Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Sedgemoor District Council 2015 Revision Schedule Rev Author Date Status and Descripton 02 AReading October Published version incorporating changes to document and mapping 2015 following consultation feedback. 01 AReading July 2015 DRAFT document for consultation with Risk Management Authorities and other stakeholders. Sedgemoor District Council 2015 Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The Sedgemoor District Council Study Area 5 3 Policy Context 8 4 Data Collection and Methodology 15 5 Broad-scale Assessment 26 6 Focused Assessments 28 7 Developer Guidance 38 8 Development Site Drainage 40 9 Emergency Planning 47 10 Summary & Recommendations 48 Appendix 1 - Mapping 52 Appendix 2 - Wessex Water Sewer Flooding Data 53 Appendix 3 - Emergency Planning Mapping 54 Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Sedgemoor District Council 2015 1 Introduction 1 Background 1.1 In 2008 Sedgemoor District Council completed a level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) as part of the evidence base for the Council’s Core Strategy (1). The Core Strategy was later adopted in 2011 and is the current Development Plan for the District. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that Local Plans should be supported by an SFRA which should be prepared in consultation with the Environment Agency and other Risk Management Authorities (2). This document therefore updates the previous level 1 SFRA document to provide appropriate information to inform the Council’s Core Strategy (Local Plan) review process (2011-2032).
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 11 – Protected Areas
    River Basin Management Plan South West River Basin District Annex D: Protected area objectives Contents D.1 Introduction 2 D.2 Types and location of protected areas 3 D.3 Monitoring network 12 D.4 Objectives 19 D.5 Compliance (results of monitoring) including 22 actions (measures) for Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas and Natura 2000 Protected Areas D.6 Other information 152 D.1 Introduction The Water Framework Directive specifies that areas requiring special protection under other EC Directives and waters used for the abstraction of drinking water are identified as protected areas. These areas have their own objectives and standards. Article 4 of the Water Framework Directive requires Member States to achieve compliance with the standards and objectives set for each protected area by 22 December 2015, unless otherwise specified in the Community legislation under which the protected area was established. Some areas may require special protection under more than one EC Directive or may have additional (surface water and/or groundwater) objectives. In these cases, all the objectives and standards must be met. Article 6 requires Member States to establish a register of protected areas. The types of protected areas that must be included in the register are: • areas designated for the abstraction of water for human consumption (Drinking Water Protected Areas); • areas designated for the protection of economically significant aquatic species (Freshwater Fish and Shellfish); • bodies of water designated as recreational waters, including areas designated as Bathing Waters; • nutrient-sensitive areas, including areas identified as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones under the Nitrates Directive or areas designated as sensitive under Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD); • areas designated for the protection of habitats or species where the maintenance or improvement of the status of water is an important factor in their protection including relevant Natura 2000 sites1.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    S O L c f c h V J e s t B o x 1 3 Environment Agency E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y South West Region Environment Protection 1997 EC Directive Compliance Report ■ August 1998 Compiled By: Dean Levy Technical Assistant (Quality Assessment) Water Quality Technical Series QA 98/01 M G Booth Regional Environment Protection Manager ENVIRONMENT AGENCY - SOUTH WEST REGION 1997 EC Directive Compliance Report This report is a compilation of the Head Office returns for compliance with EC Directives in 1997. The report highlights sites which were non-comp!iant in 1997 and includes a progress update on investigations at sites which failed in 1996. In addition historic compliance for each Directive is included for reference purposes. It is intended that the report should be used by Area and Regional staff in discussions of requirements for investigations into non-compliance. The report is also intended to highlight consenting issues for discussion, particularly regarding Dangerous Substances. CONTENTS Section Page 1 EC BATHING WATERS DIRECTIVE 5 1.) 1997 EC Bathing Waters Directive Compliance 6 1.1.1 1997 Compliance With Mandatory Coliform Standards 1.1.2 1997 Compliance With Guideline Coliform And Streptococci Standards 7 1.1.3 Reasons For Failure of Mandatory Standards At South West Bathing Waters During 1997 8 1.1.4 Summary Of Non-Compliance Against Guideline Microbiological Standards 14 1.2 Historic Bathing Waters Compliance (Mandatory Standards) 19 EC DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES DIRECTIVE LIST I 27 2.1 1997 EC Dangerous Substances Directive List
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan
    local environment agency plan RIVER PARRETT CONSULTATION REPORT MARCH 1997 'f ■ ■ j En v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House. Waterside Drive. Aziec West. Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD O k FOREWORD This Plan represents a significant step forward in environmental thinking. It has been clear for many years that the problems of land, air and water, particularly in the realm of pollution control, cannot be adequately addressed individually. They are interdependent, each affecting the others. The Government’s answer was to create the Environment Agency with the umbrella responsibility for all three. The role and duties of the Agency are set out in this document. This holistic approach is now reflected in this Plan. It is a logical development of the Catchment Management Plans prepared by the old National Rivers Authority, now subsumed into the new Agency. It sets out the environmental problems of the area in a way which has not been done before,' and suggests the most important issues which should now be addressed. It is, I believe, vital reading for everyone concerned with the future of North Wessex. The catchment of the River Parrett and its tributaries, the Rivers Isle, Yeo, and Cary encompasses a varied and complex environment, which includes a major part o f the important Somerset Levels and Moors. This is the first Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) produced in North Wessex Area.
    [Show full text]