DOCSLIB.ORG

Mustela Erminea And) and Managementred Deer ( Cervus Elaphus ) Off Islands in Fiordland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mustela Erminea And) and Managementred Deer ( Cervus Elaphus ) Off Islands in Fiordland Edge, K-A.; D. Crouchley, P. McMurtrie, M.J. Willans,Island and A. Byrom.invasives: Eradicating eradicationstoats ( Mustela erminea and) and managementred deer ( Cervus elaphus ) off islands in Fiordland Eradicating stoats (Mustela erminea) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) off islands in Fiordland K-A. Edge 1, D. Crouchley 1, P. McMurtrie 1, M.J. Willans 2, and A. Byrom 3 1Department of Conservation, Te Anau Area Offi ce, PO Box 29, Lakefront Drive, Te Anau 9640, New Zealand. <[email protected]>. 2The Wilderness, RD Te Anau-Mossburn Highway, Te Anau, NZ. 3Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand. Abstract In 2004, the New Zealand Government allocated NZ$7.1M to eradicate stoats ( Mustela erminea ) and red deer (Cervus elaphus ) from Fiordland’s two largest islands: Secretary Island (8100 ha) and Resolution Island (21,000 ha), in SW New Zealand. Both islands are rugged and within the swimming range of stoats and deer from the mainland. Here we apply the six strategic rules for achieving eradication to the Secretary and Resolution islands programme and use these rules as means of assessing progress fi ve years into the campaign. For these programmes ‘eradication’ has been defi ned as the complete removal of the stoat and deer populations, and the establishment of long-term control to manage reinvasion. While the original eradication objectives are yet to be achieved, the planned conservation outcomes are on track; several threatened species of birds have been successfully reintroduced and the regeneration of palatable plants is apparent. The conservation importance of large islands such as Secretary and Resolution in terms of New Zealand’s commitments to international biodiversity conventions and restoration goals cannot be overstated. However, attempting mammal eradications on such large islands in close proximity to the mainland challenges conventional paradigms for eradication. These challenges are likely to be faced increasingly by other conservation managers in New Zealand and internationally. Keywords: Secretary Island, Resolution Island, eradication, restoration, strategic rules, extirpation. INTRODUCTION Fiordland National Park, in the southwest of the South and Bauza Island (480 ha) in 2002 gave managers the Island of New Zealand, contains C. 90 islands ranging in confi dence to tackle much larger islands such as Secretary size from small rock stacks up to Secretary Island (8140 ha), and Resolution (Elliott et al . 2010). at the entrance to Doubtful Sound, and Resolution Island (20,860 ha) lying between Breaksea and Dusky Sounds Successful eradications of pest species from islands in (Fig. 1). The total land area of Fiordland islands exceeds Fiordland have not been limited to stoats. In 2002-2007, 40,000 ha of which over 31,000 ha has been targeted for red deer were removed from Anchor Island in Dusky pest eradication. Sound (Crouchley et al . 2011). Successful control over 50 000 ha in the Murchison Mountains (Fraser and Nugent Stoats ( Mustela erminea ) were fi rst introduced into 2003) demonstrated the feasibility of reducing the deer mainland New Zealand in the late 1880s in response to population to near-zero density elsewhere in Fiordland feral rabbit ( Oryctolagus cuniculus ) plagues. In 1891, National Park and in habitats similar to those on Secretary Resolution Island was gazetted as one of the world’s fi rst and Resolution Islands. ‘reserves’. Richard Henry, curator of Resolution Island, realised the value of islands that might avoid invasion by The enormous potential for pest-eradication and stoats and translocated 572 birds, mostly kiwi and kakapo, restoration on Secretary and Resolution Islands was to the island sanctuary. Stoats are competent swimmers recognised in 2004, when the New Zealand Government (Taylor and Tilley 1984) and they had invaded many of allocated NZ$7.1 million over 10 years to eradicate stoats the remote coastal islands of Fiordland only six years and deer from both islands. Further acknowledgement of after their introduction to New Zealand. By 1900, Henry their current intrinsic and potential future ecological values had confi rmed the worst when he observed a stoat on came in 2007 when they were reclassifi ed as ‘Restoration Resolution Island (Hill and Hill 1987). Stoats probably Islands’ within the Fiordland National Park Management invaded Secretary Island around the same time. Plan (2007). In 1963, the New Zealand Government designated The Department of Conservation has developed an Secretary Island a ‘Special Area’ within Fiordland National international reputation for pioneering successful single- Park due to the island’s unmodifi ed vegetation and the species (rodent) eradications on remote islands (Cromarty complete absence of introduced browsing or grazing animals et al . 2002). The next step was to expand to a ‘successive (brushtail possums; Trichosurus vulpecula and red deer; culls’ approach spanning many years for invasive ungulate Cervus elaphus scoticus ). In reality, red deer had probably and mustelid species. This approach was planned for already established at the northern end of Secretary Island Secretary and Resolution Islands and is the subject of our but it was not until 1970 that a small resident population paper. was confi rmed (Mark et al . 1991). Control measures for red deer were implemented between 1970 and 1987 and GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FIORDLAND’S although hundreds of deer were killed, control did not have ‘RESTORATION ISLANDS’ a major impact on the population (Brown 2005). Resolution Island, also free of possums, had red deer established in IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of high numbers by 1947 (Sutherland 1957). Nature) guidelines defi ne eradication as the complete removal of an alien invasive species ( IUCN Guidelines Since 1999, the feasibility of eradicating island for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss caused by Alien populations of stoats and managing immigration Invasive Species , May 2000) whereas a programme of from locations within stoat swimming range has been sustained control is focussed on managing the impacts of demonstrated. Eradications of stoats from Chalky Island such species through continuous or periodic population (514 ha) in 1999, Anchor Island (1130 ha) in 2001, reduction (Cromarty et al. 2002). In the operational Pages 166-171 In: Veitch, C. R.; Clout, M. N. and Towns, D. R. (eds.). 2011. Island invasives: eradication and management. IUCN,166 Gland, Switzerland. Edge et al .: Stoats and deer off Fiordland islands and restoration plans for these programmes the term be achieved without eradication, discounted future benefi ts ‘eradication’ referred to the complete removal of the stoat should favour the one-off costs of eradication over the and deer populations, and the establishment of long-term ongoing costs of sustained control; and 6) ideally, animals control programmes to manage reinvasion. Three goals surviving the campaign should be detectable and dealt with were established: 1) eradicate stoats and deer; 2) enhance before an increased population size becomes obvious. the ecological values of the islands for threatened species re-introductions; and 3) ensure that these islands remain The fi rst three are regarded as crucial rules (Parkes virtually pest-free through effective island biosecurity. 1990), which, unless they are met, eradication cannot proceed. Rules 4-6 are regarded as desirable (Bomford Six strategic rules must be met in order for eradication and O’Brien 1995). For example, eradication might still to be possible (Parkes 1990; Bomford and O’Brien 1995; proceed despite social opposition. We recognised from the Parkes et al . 2002): 1) all target animals must be put at outset that reinvasion by stoats and deer was inevitable, risk to the methods being applied; 2) target species must so we adopted the alternative interpretation of Rule 3: the be killed at rates faster than their rate of increase at all probability of the pest re-establishing is manageable to densities; 3) the risk of recolonisation must be zero; 4) social near-zero (after Broome et al. 2005). and economic conditions must be conducive to meeting the critical rules; 5) where the benefi ts of management can Below we discuss project planning for the stoat and deer campaigns for Secretary and Resolution Islands in terms of the six rules for eradication. STOATS For both islands, it seemed possible to put all stoats at risk with existing tools, tactics and strategic planning, as was detailed in operational plans by Golding et al. (2005) and McMurtrie et al. (2008). That all animals must be put at risk to the methods being applied (Rule 1), was thus considered a priori to hold for stoats. Large numbers of stoats were removed in the knockdown on Secretary and Resolution Islands, but we have yet to achieve our objective of eradication (McMurtrie et al . 2011). A few stoats may have retained small home ranges even with the signifi cant population reduction and have therefore never come in contact with a trap. Alternatively, a few animals may avoid entering a trap tunnel either for an extended period of time or in perpetuity (Crouchley 1994; King and Powell 2009). Rule 1, therefore, does not appear to hold for stoats on either island at the time of writing. Stoat eradication programmes on other Fiordland islands demonstrated that animals could be killed in traps faster than their rate of increase (Rule 2), even at low densities (Elliott et al . 2010). With stoats, however, the real issue is not population density per se , but the ability to respond rapidly to ‘pulsed’ events such as immigration or in-situ breeding, particularly during mast years (Wittmer et. al. 2007). Rule 2 was thus considered to hold for stoats on both islands. On Secretary Island, trapping results indicate that the stoat population is being maintained at a very low level without further decline (McMurtrie et al . 2011) so we are not meeting Rule 2. It is too early to establish the trend for Resolution Island. It was known from the outset that the risk of recolonisation by stoats would not be zero (Rule 3) on either island (Elliott et al .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Re-Establishing North Island Kākā (Nestor Meridionalis Septentrionalis
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Re-establishing North Island kākā (Nestor meridionalis septentrionalis) in New Zealand A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Conservation Biology Massey University Auckland, New Zealand Tineke Joustra 2018 ii For Orlando, Aurora and Nayeli “I don’t want my children to follow in my footsteps, I want them to take the path next to me and go further than I could have ever dreamt possible” Anonymous iii iv Abstract Recently there has been a global increase in concern over the unprecedented loss of biodiversity and how the sixth mass extinction event is mainly due to human activities. Countries such as New Zealand have unique ecosystems which led to the evolution of many endemic species. One such New Zealand species is the kākā (Nestor meridionalis). Historically, kākā abundance has been affected by human activities (kākā were an important food source for Māori and Europeans). Today, introduced mammalian predators are one of the main threats to wild kākā populations. Although widespread and common throughout New Zealand until the 1800’s, kākā populations on the mainland now heavily rely on active conservation management. The main methods of kākā management include pest control and re-establishments. This thesis evaluated current and past commitments to New Zealand species restoration, as well as an analysis of global Psittacine re-establishment efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • (Strigops Habroptilus) on Maud Island
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive 143 Seasonal changes in home range size and habitat selection by kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) on Maud Island JULIE WALSH Abstract Seasonal changes in home range size and habitat selection of kakapo Ecology and Entomology Group, P.O. Box 84, (Strigops habroptilus) were investigated on Maud Island. Kakapo were radio-tracked Lincoln University, New Zealand. at night in each of the four seasons between December 2000 and October 2001. [email protected] Home ranges were estimated for four adult males, three juvenile males and two juvenile females in each season and for nine females in summer, each based on KERRY-JAYNE WILSON 20 radio-fixes per season. Home range size varied from 1.8 to 145.0 ha using the Bio-Protection and Ecology Division, P.O. minimum convex polygon method. Home ranges were smallest in winter. Habitat Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand selection was determined by overlaying the kakapo locations and home ranges on a vegetation map of the island. For each season selection ratios were calculated GRAEME P. ELLIOTT for each vegetation community. Pine plantation (Pinus radiata) was selected for in Research, Development & Improvement summer, whereas the treeland community dominated by five- fingerPseudopanax ( Division, Department of Conservation, arbereus) was selected for in the autumn. Dense pole stands of manuka Private Bag 5, Nelson, New Zealand (Leptospemum scoparium) and pasture communities were avoided by kakapo. Walsh, J.; Wilson, K-J.; Elliott, G.P. 2006. Seasonal changes in home range size and habitat selection by kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) on Maud Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Future Options for Wetapunga on Little Barrier Island
    Abundance and future options for wetapunga on Little Barrier Island SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION: 48 George Gibbs and Mary McIntyre Published by Department of Conservation P.O. Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand 1 Science for Conservation presents the results of investigations contracted to science providers outside the Department of Conservation. Reports are subject to peer review within and outside the Department. May 1997, Department of Conservation ISSN 1173-2946 ISBN 0-478-01896-7 This publication originated from work done under Department of Conservation contract 1959 carried out by George Gibbs and Mary McIntyre, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, PO Box 600, Wellington. It was approved for publication by the Director, Science and Research Division, Department of Conservation, Wellington. Cataloguing-in-Publication data Gibbs, George W. (George William), 1937– Abundance and future options for wetapunga on Little Barrier Island / George Gibbs and Mary McIntyre. Wellington, N.Z. : Dept. of Conservation, 1997. 1 v. ; 30 cm. (Science for conservation, 1173-2946 ; 48.) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0478018967 1. Giant wetas- -New Zealand- -Little Barrier Island. 2. Weta punga. I. McIntyre, M. E. (Mary E.) II. Title. III. Series: Science for conservation (Wellington, N.Z.) ; 48. 595.7260993245 20 zbn97-045241 2 CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 5 1.1 Objectives 6 1.2 Visits to Little Barrier Island 6 2. Assessment of numbers 6 2.1 Methods 7 2.2 Results 8 2.3 Discussion of population size 8 3. Habitat use 9 3.1 Use of shelters 10 3.2 Radiotracking study 10 3.3 Discussion of predators and role of shelters 12 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Petrels of Dusky Sound, Fiordland – Survivors from a Century of Stoat Invasions
    136 Notornis, 2017, Vol. 64: 136-153 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand Inc. Breeding petrels of Dusky Sound, Fiordland – survivors from a century of stoat invasions COLIN M. MISKELLY* ALAN J.D. TENNYSON JEAN-CLAUDE STAHL Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington 6140, New Zealand ANDREW F. SMART HANNAH K. EDMONDS PETER G. MCMURTRIE Department of Conservation, PO Box 29, Te Anau 9600, New Zealand Abstract A total of 49 breeding colonies of 3 petrel species was found on 44 of 56 islands surveyed in Dusky Sound, Fiordland National Park, New Zealand, in November 2016. Sooty shearwater (Puffinus griseus) was the most widespread and abundant species, with an estimated 21,400 burrows on 35 islands. Mottled petrels (Pterodroma inexpectata) were breeding on 12 islands (5500 burrows estimated), and broad-billed prions (Pachyptila vittata) on 2 islands (560 burrows estimated). Sooty shearwaters were found breeding among mottled petrels on 4 islands, and among broad-billed prions on 1 island. This is a 5-fold increase in the number of petrel colonies in Dusky Sound identified in published accounts, and the first estimate of the number of burrows on each island. Long-term survival of most or all of these colonies is dependent on ongoing control of stoats (Mustela erminea) in Dusky Sound. However, we suggest that islands too small to support a resident stoat population provided partial refugia for petrels, even if the islands are within stoat swimming range, allowing petrels to persist for multiple generations. In contrast, petrels were apparently rapidly extirpated from islands over 100 ha, where stoats maintained a resident population.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parrot Apart: the Natural History of the Kakapo (Strigops Habroptilus), and the Context of Its Conservation Management
    A parrot apart: the natural history of the kakapo (Strigops habroptilus), and the context of its conservation management RALPH G. POWLESLAND Abstract Since the last review of kakapo biology, published 50 years ago, much Research, Development & Improvement has been learnt as a result of the transfer of all known individuals to offshore islands, Division, Department of Conservation, P.O. and their intensive management to increase adult survival and productivity. This Box 10-420, Wellington, New Zealand review summarises information on a diversity of topics, including taxonomy, plumage, [email protected] moult, mass, anatomy, physiology, reasons for decline in distribution, present numbers and status, sex ratio, habitat, home range, foraging activities, diet, voice, DON V. MERTON breeding biology, nesting success, sexual maturity, and adult survival. In addition, Honorary Research Associate, Research, those kakapo attributes that compromise its long-term survival in present-day New Development & Improvement Division, Zealand are discussed, along with management practises developed to overcome Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10- these problems. 420, Wellington, New Zealand Powlesland, R.G.; Merton, D.V.; Cockrem, J.F. 2006. A parrot apart: the natural JOHN F. COCKREM history of the kakapo (Strigops habroptilus), and the context of its conservation Conservation Endocrinology Research management. Notornis 53 (1): 3 - 26. Group, Institute of Veterinary, Animal & Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Keywords Kakapo; Strigops habroptilus; Psittacidae; endangered species; review; Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, natural history; management practices; predatory mammals New Zealand INTRODUCTION The kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) is a large parrot (males 1.6 – 3.6 kg, females 0.9 – 1.9 kg) (Higgins 1999), with finely barred or mottled yellowish-green plumage.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Kākāpō
    A history of kākāpō Pre-human settlement Pre-human settlement Kākāpō are abundant throughout New Māori settlement Zealand. Māori settlers bring kiore (Polynesian rat) and kurī (Polynesian dog). Māori also hunt kākāpō. 1800s Kākāpō are confined to 1800 1894 the central North Island Government’s first and forested areas of the attempt to save the South Island. species. Conservation European settlers bring rats, ranger Richard Henry stoats, cats and extensive habitat loss moved several hundred begins. Kākāpō began to decline rapidly. kākāpō to predator-free Lithograph: J G Keulemans, 1872, London. Resolution Island in Fiordland. Richard Henry, 1900. 1900 Source: Hocken Library, Dunedin Stoats reach Resolution Island and begin the eventual destruction of the entire 1949–1967 kākāpō population 1900 there. More than 60 expeditions to find kākāpō, focusing on Fiordland, with only 6 males caught. Species seems doomed to extinction. 1974–1975 Three Fiordland male kākāpō, including Richard 1970 1973–1977 Henry, are transferred to offshore island sanctuary No females and 18 males are found in Fiordland. Maud Island (Te Pāteka). Only one, Richard Henry, lives to pass on his genes to the current population. 1980 Cats are eradicated from Te Hauturu-o-Toi/Little 1977 Barrier island in the Hauraki Gulf/Tīkapa Moana. Estimate of 200 kākāpō found living on Stewart Island/Rakiura. First female kākāpō is found on Stewart Island/ Rakiura. Use of tracker dogs begins as 1979 cage trapping is found to be First male kākāpō, named Mawson, is captured on too slow. 16 birds are caught Stewart Island/Rakiura. including 3 females. First 2 Stewart Island/Rakiura 1980 birds transfered to Maud 1981–1982 Island (Te Pāteka).
    [Show full text]
  • Fiordland National Park Management Plan
    Fiordland National Park Management Plan JUNE 2007 Fiordland National Park Management Plan JUNE 2007 Southland Conservancy Conservation Management Planning Series Published by Department of Conservation PO Box 743 Invercargill New Zealand © Copyright New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 978-0-478-14278-5 (hardcopy) ISBN 978-0-478-14279-2 (web PDF) ISBN 978-0-478-14280-8 (CD PDF) TAUPARA MÖ ATAWHENUA Tü wätea te Waka o Aoraki Tü te ngahere a Täne Ngä wai keri a Tü Te Rakiwhänoa Rere mai rere atu ngä wai a Tangaroa Honoa wai o maunga Ki te Moana a Tawhaki Papaki tü Ki te Moana Täpokapoka a Tawaki Ka tü te mana Te ihi Te wehi Te tapu O Käi Tahu, Käti Mamoe, Waitaha Whano ! Whano ! Haramai te toki Haumi e, Hui e Täiki e ! The waka of Aoraki lay barren The Täne created the forests Tü Te Rakiwhänoa sculpted the fiords allowing the sea to flow in and out and mix with the rivers that flow from the mountains to the seas of the west the waves of which clash with those of the great Southern Ocean The prestige endures The strength endures The awesomeness endures The sacredness endures Of Käi Tahu, Käti Mamoe, Waitaha It’s alive ! It’s alive ! Bring on the toki Gather Bind All is set 3 4 HOW TO USE THIS PLAN It is anticipated that this plan will have two main uses. Firstly, as an information resource and secondly, as a guide for Fiordland National Park managers, commercial operators and the public when considering the future uses of Fiordland National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Wildlife Translocations in the Marlborough Sounds
    A history of wildlife translocations in the Marlborough Sounds Peter Gaze and Bill Cash SEPTEMBER 2008 Published by Department of Conservation Private Bag 5 Nelson, New Zealand Occasional Publication No. 72 © Copyright 2007, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 0113-3853 ISBN 978-0-478-14293-8 Cover photo: Green gecko (Hoplodactylus manukanus) by Jason Butt. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 2. Species accounts 6 2.1 Little spotted kiwi (Apteryx owenii) 6 2.2 Okarito brown kiwi (Apteryx austalis) 6 2.3 Fairy prion (Pachyptila turtur) 7 2.4 Diving petrel (Pelecanoides urinatrix) 7 2.5 Fluttering shearwater (Puffinus gavia) 8 2.6 Weka (Gallirallus australis) 8 2.7 Takahe (Porphyrio mantelli) 9 2.8 Kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) 10 2.9 Yellow-crowned parakeet (Cyanoramphus auriceps) 11 2.10 Orange-fronted parakeet (Cyanoramphus malherbi) 11 2.11 Antipodes Island parakeet (Cyanoramphus unicolor) 11 2.12 South Island robin (Petroica australia australis) 12 2.13 South Island tit (Petroica macrocephala macrocephala) 12 2.14 South Island saddleback (Philesturnus carunculatus carunculatus) 13 2.15 Mohua (Mohoua ochrocephala) 14 2.16 Maud Island frog (Leiopelma pakeka) 14 2.17 Hamilton’s frog (Leiopelma hamiltoni) 15 2.18 Marlborough green gecko (Naultinus manukanus) 15 2.19 Speckled skink (Oligosoma infrapunctatum) 16 2.20 Brown skink (Oligosoma zelandicum) 16 2.21 Gunther’s tuatara (Sphenodon guntheri) 16 2.22 Cook Strait tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) 17 2.23 Flax weevil (Anagotus fairburni) 18 2.24 Giant weta (Deinacrida rugosa) 18 3. Future translocations 19 4. Acknowledgements 20 5. References 21 1. Introduction The translocation of wildlife to predator-free islands has become a key tool for conservation in New Zealand where predation is often the cause of declining populations.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Wildlife Translocations in the Marlborough Sounds
    A history of wildlife translocations in the Marlborough Sounds Peter Gaze and Bill Cash SEPTEMBER 2008 Published by Department of Conservation Private Bag 5 Nelson, New Zealand Occasional Publication No. 72 © Copyright 2007, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 0113-3853 ISBN 978-0-478-14293-8 Cover photo: Green gecko (Hoplodactylus manukanus) by Jason Butt. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 2. Species accounts 6 2.1 Little spotted kiwi (Apteryx owenii) 6 2.2 Okarito brown kiwi (Apteryx austalis) 6 2.3 Fairy prion (Pachyptila turtur) 7 2.4 Diving petrel (Pelecanoides urinatrix) 7 2.5 Fluttering shearwater (Puffinus gavia) 8 2.6 Weka (Gallirallus australis) 8 2.7 Takahe (Porphyrio mantelli) 9 2.8 Kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) 10 2.9 Yellow-crowned parakeet (Cyanoramphus auriceps) 11 2.10 Orange-fronted parakeet (Cyanoramphus malherbi) 11 2.11 Antipodes Island parakeet (Cyanoramphus unicolor) 11 2.12 South Island robin (Petroica australia australis) 12 2.13 South Island tit (Petroica macrocephala macrocephala) 12 2.14 South Island saddleback (Philesturnus carunculatus carunculatus) 13 2.15 Mohua (Mohoua ochrocephala) 14 2.16 Maud Island frog (Leiopelma pakeka) 14 2.17 Hamilton’s frog (Leiopelma hamiltoni) 15 2.18 Marlborough green gecko (Naultinus manukanus) 15 2.19 Speckled skink (Oligosoma infrapunctatum) 16 2.20 Brown skink (Oligosoma zelandicum) 16 2.21 Gunther’s tuatara (Sphenodon guntheri) 16 2.22 Cook Strait tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) 17 2.23 Flax weevil (Anagotus fairburni) 18 2.24 Giant weta (Deinacrida rugosa) 18 3. Future translocations 19 4. Acknowledgements 20 5. References 21 1. Introduction The translocation of wildlife to predator-free islands has become a key tool for conservation in New Zealand where predation is often the cause of declining populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Issue 38 November 2017
    PATRON: RUUD KLEINPASTE PO BOX 48-232, BLOCKHOUSE BAY, AUCKLAND 0644 NEWSLETTER WWW.LITTLEBARRIERISLAND.ORG.NZ ISSUE 38 NOVEMBER 2017 FROM THE CHAIR I hope you have all had the chance now to watch the 11-minute approved funds for research into the genetics of Hauturu’s hihi video prepared for the Trust by NHNZ and generously funded by population. The fieldwork has now been carried out and we will the Becroft Foundation. It is free to view on YouTube – “Little have a report to share with you in due course. Barrier Island: New Zealand’s Ark” – and is a great heart- The Conservation Management Plan for Te Hauturu-o-Toi was lifter for those of us that love NZ’s unique natural heritage. approved by the Ngäti Manuhiri Settlement Trust and the Auckland I would like to welcome our newest trustee, Shane McInnes. Conservation Board and released in October (see page 4). Shane was a ranger on Hauturu for several years, but now Finally thanks to all our supporters, many of whom have given has a land-based job and a young family and is keen to give generous donations of time or money towards ensuring that something back to the island. The Trust is keen to benefit from Hauturu remains the jewel in the crown and the exemplar for his expert knowledge of the island as well as his youth and all other restoration goals around New Zealand. enthusiasm. Lyn Wade – Chair Sadly we acknowledge the passing of a previous trustee, Geoff Drew, who had retired from the Trust last year after many years as the accountant (see page 7).
    [Show full text]
  • And Red Deer (Cervus Elaphus) Off Islands in Fiordland
    Edge, K-A.; D. Crouchley, P. McMurtrie, M.J. Willans,Island and A. Byrom.invasives: Eradicating eradicationstoats (Mustela erminea and) and managementred deer (Cervus elaphus) off islands in Fiordland Eradicating stoats (Mustela erminea) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) off islands in Fiordland K-A. Edge1, D. Crouchley1, P. McMurtrie1, M.J. Willans2, and A. Byrom3 1Department of Conservation, Te Anau Area Office, PO Box 29, Lakefront Drive, Te Anau 9640, New Zealand. <[email protected]>. 2The Wilderness, RD Te Anau-Mossburn Highway, Te Anau, NZ. 3Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand. Abstract In 2004, the New Zealand Government allocated NZ$7.1M to eradicate stoats (Mustela erminea) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) from Fiordland’s two largest islands: Secretary Island (8100 ha) and Resolution Island (21,000 ha), in SW New Zealand. Both islands are rugged and within the swimming range of stoats and deer from the mainland. Here we apply the six strategic rules for achieving eradication to the Secretary and Resolution islands programme and use these rules as means of assessing progress five years into the campaign. For these programmes ‘eradication’ has been defined as the complete removal of the stoat and deer populations, and the establishment of long-term control to manage reinvasion. While the original eradication objectives are yet to be achieved, the planned conservation outcomes are on track; several threatened species of birds have been successfully reintroduced and the regeneration of palatable plants is apparent. The conservation importance of large islands such as Secretary and Resolution in terms of New Zealand’s commitments to international biodiversity conventions and restoration goals cannot be overstated.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Fiordland's Biodiversity 1987-2015 Part 1
    Conserving Fiordland’s biodiversity 1987–2015 The challenges, the achievements, the knowledge Te Tiaki i te Taiao ki Tu Rua o te moko Ngā wero, ngā haumāuiui, ngā mātauranga Conserving Fiordland’s biodiversity, 1987–2015 The challenges, the achievements, the knowledge Te Tiaki i te Taiao ki Tu Rua o te moko Ngā wero, ngā haumāuiui, ngā mātauranga PUBLISHED BY: Department of Conservation, Te Anau District Office, PO Box 29, Te Anau 9640, New Zealand August 2017 FRONT COVER: Looking north from Tamatea/Dusky Sound along the Acheron Passage. Photo: Rob Suisted. BACK COVER: DOC Biodiversity Ranger Megan Willans checks for translocated rock wrens on the summit of Kā-Tū-Waewae-o Tū/ Secretary Island, at the mouth of Doubtful Sound/Patea, January 2009. Photo: Rod Morris. EDITING AND DESIGN: Lynette Clelland, Publishing Team, Department of Conservation, Wellington ISBN: 978-1-98-851439-0 (Print) 978-1-98-851440-6 (Web) Crown copyright © August 2017 New Zealand Department of Conservation Contents A note from the compilers 7 Foreword 9 Kupu Whakataki 10 1. FIORDLAND – RUGGED AND DIVERSE 13 2. ISLAND PEST ERADICATIONS 17 Deer eradication programmes 18 Stoat eradication programmes 21 The future of island pest eradication programmes in Fiordland 24 3. TRANSLOCATION AS A TOOL FOR CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT 30 What is species translocation and why do we do it? 30 Species translocations in Fiordland 30 Translocations and the role of genetics 40 Failed translocations – what have we learnt? 40 4. MAINLAND WEED AND PEST CONTROL 45 Management of weeds 45 Management of deer, chamois and goats 52 Management of possums, stoats and rats 58 5.
    [Show full text]