DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment SURREY HEATH LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2001-2016 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Date Assessment March 2005 Revised Scoping Report DocumentFinal Document Type MarchDate 2005 ‘leading for tomorrow’ FOREWORD A new system of Local Development Frameworks (LDFs) is replacing Local Plans. The new Surrey Heath LDF will guide future development in the Borough up to 2016. The new LDF will be a series of Development Plan Documents (DPDs). Under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, sustainability appraisal is mandatory for Development Plan Documents. An environmental assessment is also required under European Directive 2001/42/EC ‘on the assessment of certain plans and programmes on the environment’. Accordingly, this Scoping Report has been prepared to meet both requirements. The Scoping Report is a consultation document, the purpose of which is to describe the scope and timetable for the sustainability appraisal of the Surrey Heath Development Plan Documents. Consultation helps to ensure that the sustainability appraisal will be comprehensive and robust enough to support the Development Plan Documents during the later stages of full public consultation and examination. The report has been prepared for consultation, pursuant to: • Regulation 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) 2004 Regulations, and • Regulation 12 (5) of the Environmental assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004. The initial Scoping Report was presented to and noted by Members of the Local Development Framework Working Group on the 29th of September 2004 and released for a period of consultation ending on the 19th of November 2004. The report is now finalised and takes into account the responses that were received by the Council during consultation. Prepared by: Planning Policy and Conservation Team Built Environment Division Surrey Heath Borough Council Surrey Heath House Knoll Road CAMBERLEY Surrey GU15 3HD March 2005 SURREY HEATH BOROUGH COUNCIL: SA/SEA OF LDF Revised Scoping Report Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 1-1 Background 1-1 Requirement for Strategic Environmental Assessment 1-1 Purpose of Scoping Report 1-5 Joint Working 1-5 Scoping Report Consultation 1-5 2. Other Plans and Programmes 2-1 Introduction 2-1 Method 2-1 3. Baseline Data 3-1 Method 3-1 4. Key Sustainability Issues 4-1 Introduction 4-1 Method 4-1 5. SA/SEA Framework of Objectives, Indicators and Targets 5-1 Introduction 5-1 Methodology 5-1 Compatibility Of Objectives 5-8 6. Content of Initial Sustainability Report and Sustainability Appraisal Report 6-1 Initial Sustainability Appraisal Report 6-1 The Sustainability Appraisal Report 6-1 Appendix A: Baseline Data Tables i Appendix B: Derivation of Objectives from IRF 2004 xiv i SURREY HEATH BOROUGH COUNCIL: SA/SEA OF LDF Revised Scoping Report List of Tables Table 1.1: Consultation Timetable for the Local Development Framework and Sustainability Appraisal Process 1-1 Table 1.2: Summary of Responses from Consultation 1-7 Table 2.1: Relevant Plans, Programmes and Strategies 2-2 Table 2.2: Derivation of SA/SEA Objectives 2-4 Table 4.1: Key Environmental and Sustainability Issues 4-2 Table 5.1: SA/SEA Framework 5-2 Table 5.2: SA/SEA Compatibility Assessment 5-9 Table 6.1: Likely Structure of the Sustainability Appraisal Report 6-2 List of Figures Figure 1.1: Relationship between SA/SEA Stages and Tasks 1-4 Figure 4.1: Nature Conservation Sites 4-8 List of Appendices Appendix A Baseline Environmental Data Tables Appendix B Derivation of Objectives from Integrated Regional Framework 2004 This document is copyright and should not be copied in whole or in part by any means other than with the approval of Atkins Consultants Limited. Any unauthorised user of the document shall be responsible for all liabilities arising out of such use. ii SURREY HEATH BOROUGH COUNCIL: SA/SEA OF LDF Revised Scoping Report 1. INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND 1.1 Surrey Heath Borough Council is undertaking a review of the adopted Local Plan 2000 with the new system of Local Development Frameworks (LDFs). The LDF will guide future development in the Borough up to 2016. It will be made up of a series of Development Plan Documents (DPDs), prepared in stages. For the first period up to 2007, the Council will prepare one DPD namely The Core Strategy. The current timetable is: Table 1.1: Consultation Timetable for the Local Development Framework and Sustainability Appraisal Process Stage Date Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report October/November 2004 Preferred Option for Statement of Community November/December 2004 Involvement (SCI) Initial Sustainability Report for Options for the February/March 2005 Core Strategy Submission to the Secretary of State (SoS) of April 2005 SCI Preferred Options Development Plan September/October 2005 Documents for the Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report December 2005 Adoption of SCI December 2005 Submission to SoS of Development Plan June/July 2006 Documents for the Core Strategy. Final Sustainability Appraisal Report Plan adoption (Estimate) Early 2007 REQUIREMENT FOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1.2 The EU Directive 2001/42/EC on assessment of effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive) came into force in the UK on 20 July 2004 through the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004. The objective of the Directive is: ‘to provide for a high level of protection of the environment and to contribute to the integration of environmental considerations into the preparation and adoptions of plans … with a view to promoting sustainable development, by ensuring that, in accordance with this Directive, an environmental assessment is carried out of certain plans …which are likely to have significant effects on the environment’. (Article 1, 2001/42/EC) 1.3 It is clear from this definition that given the scope of Local Development Frameworks, an environmental assessment is required. It has not therefore been considered necessary to make a determination concerning the need for an environmental assessment of these documents with respect to Regulation 9. 1-1 SURREY HEATH BOROUGH COUNCIL: SA/SEA OF LDF Revised Scoping Report REQUIREMENT FOR SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL 1.4 Under the new Regulations1 implementing the provisions of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act, a Sustainability Appraisal (SA) is required for all LDFs. The purpose of SA is to promote sustainable development through better integration of sustainability considerations in the preparation and adoption of plans. The Regulations stipulate that SA of LDFs should meet the requirements of the EU Directive 2001/42/EC on assessment of effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (the ‘SEA Directive’). 1.5 Draft Planning Policy Statement 1 (PPS1) describes Sustainability Appraisal in Paragraph 9 of Annex B: ‘A Sustainability Appraisal is intended to assess the impact of plan policies from an environmental, economic and social perspective. It is intended to test the performance of a plan against the objectives of sustainable development and thereby provide the basis for its improvement. Guidance on carrying out the Sustainability Appraisal will show how they can comply with the requirements of the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive’. 1.6 Sustainability appraisal thus helps planning authorities to fulfil the objective of contributing to the achievement of sustainable development in preparing their plans. 1.7 There are many definitions of sustainable development, however the most commonly used and widely accepted is that coined by the World Commission of Environment and Development in 1987 as: ‘Development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.’ 1.8 The UK Strategy for Sustainable Development ‘A Better Quality of Life’ (1999) breaks down the definition into four key objectives, to be integrated and delivered simultaneously in achieving sustainable development: a) Social Progress which recognises the needs of everyone; b) Effective protection of the environment; c) Prudent use of natural resources; and d) Maintenance of high and stable levels of economic growth. SA/SEA PROCESS 1.9 The requirements to carry out SA and SEA are thus distinct, but ODPM guidance2 states that it is possible to satisfy both through a single appraisal process and provides methodologies for doing so. 1.10 According to the same guidance, the main stages in the SA/SEA process are as follows: 1 Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004. The Regulations came into force on 28 September 2004. 2 Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Frameworks, Consultation Paper, ODPM, September 2004 1-2 SURREY HEATH BOROUGH COUNCIL: SA/SEA OF LDF Revised Scoping Report ♦ Stage A – Setting the context and objectives, establishing the baseline and deciding on scope; ♦ Stage B – Developing and refining options; ♦ Stage C – Appraising the effects of the plan; ♦ Stage D – Consultation on the plan and the Sustainability Appraisal Report; ♦ Stage E – Monitoring implementation of the plan. 1.11 The interrelationship between these main stages and between the tasks in each stage is illustrated in Figure 1.1. 1.12 The guidance also requires the preparation of the following reports: ♦ Scoping Report (summarising Stage A work) which should be used for consultation on the scope of the SA; ♦ Initial Sustainability
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sussex Wildlife Trust
    s !T ~ !I ~ !f ~ !I THE SUSSEX RECORDER !f ~ !I Proceedings from the !l Biological Recorders' Seminar ?!I held at !!I the Adastra Hall, Hassocks ~ February 1996. !I ~ !I Compiled and edited by Simon Curson ~ ~ ~ !I ~ !I ~ Sussex Wildlife Trust :!f Woods Mill Sussex ~ ·~ Henfield ,~ ~ West Sussex Wildlife ;~ BN5 9SD TRUSTS !f ~ -S !T ~ ~ ~ !J ~ !J THE SUSSEX RECORDER !f !I !I Proceedings from the !I Biological Recorders' Seminar ?!I held at ~ the Adastra Hall, Hassocks ~ February 1996. !I ~ !I Compiled and edited by Simon Curson ~ ~ "!I ~ ~ !I Sussex Wildlife Trust ~ Woods Mill Sussex ~ ·~ Benfield ~ -~ West Sussex ~ Wildlife BN5 9SD TRUSTS ~ ~ .., ~' ~~ (!11 i JI l CONTENTS f!t~1 I C!! 1 Introduction 1 ~1 I ) 1 The Environmental Survey Directory - an update 2 I!~ 1 The Sites of Nature Conservation Importance (SNCI) Project 4 f!11. I The Sussex Rare Species Inventory 6 I!! i f!t I Recording Mammals 7 • 1 I!: Local Habitat Surveys - How You can Help 10 I!~ Biological Monitoring of Rivers 13 ~! Monitoring of Amphibians 15 I!! The Sussex SEASEARCH Project 17 ~·' Rye Harbour Wildlife Monitoring 19 r:! Appendix - Local Contacts for Specialist Organisations and Societies. 22 ~ I'!! -~ J: J~ .~ J~ J: Je ISBN: 1 898388 10 5 ,r: J~ J Published by '~i (~ Sussex Wildlife Trust, Woods Mill, Henfield, West Sussex, BN5 9SD .~ Registered Charity No. 207005 l~ l_ l~~l ~-J'Ii: I ~ ~ /~ ~ Introduction ·~ !J Tony Whitbread !! It is a great pleasure, once again, to introduce the Proceedings of the Biological !l' Recorders' Seminar, now firmly established as a regular feature of the biological year in Sussex.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Off-Road Cycle Route
    Norbury Park 2007:Norbury Park Leaflet 22/9/09 15:48 Page 1 Access through the barrier and go down the hill. Take care if it’s wet as the slope can become slippery. At the bottom kissing gate turn left and walk along the field headland, then turn right past the large beech trees down towards the railway. Family Off-road Cycle Route 1 This trail is approximately 7km (4 /2 miles) long, follows a firm surface and will 1 take about 1 /4 hours, it is waymarked by posts with a cycle symbol. The trail is also suitable for the more robust type of off-road pushchair and four-wheel disabled buggy/scooter. WARNING: This trail uses a short section of public road, the rest is within Norbury Park. Be prepared to meet farm vehicles and timber lorries. Back Drive possesses speed humps. Start from Fetcham car park (height restriction at entrance) take the track in front of the information board. The woodland on your right is called The Hazels and in the past has been coppiced regularly - cut down to just above ground level and allowed to regrow - to provide bean and pea sticks. In springtime the woodland floor is covered with primroses, which attract numerous feeding insects. The woodland in the distance on your left is known as Fetcham Downs. Some 60 -100 years ago much of this area was open grassland but left unmanaged it has gradually reverted to woodland. Longcut Barn on your left was once used as a holding pen for the sheep which used to graze the downland.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    LOCAL'REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLANS Plan name c. "K;IOL'JJ:: Ref. No Area $,:rev countv Regton CC.JTH LAST Organisations involved SJrrey WT Coordinating Surrey County Council Coordinating E-gltsh Nature Funding ~5x3 source of information 7#*/AG Source of information Eiv Age C:k WWF-UK and Herpetological Consewation Trust Purpose Outline long term (50 yrs) vision for arEa set targets for existing work Identify priorities Coordinate partners Audience Local CouncillorIdecisionmakers Timescale First draft Contact Jtil Barton IDebbie Wicks Surrey Wildlife Trust 01 483 488055 -~"__--_I-___"___- I --_I--.-- - Plan name Unknown Ref. No. Area Greater London Region SOUTH EAST Organisations involved Role London Wildlife Trust Coordinating London Ecology URlt Coordinating ENIEA Coordinating 3TCVIRSPB Coordinating WTINat.His. Soc. Source of information Tne above make up the steering group together vvlth another Six Purpose Outline long term (50 yrs) vision for area Set targets for existing work Identify priorities Coordinate partners Audience General public Conservation staff in paltnerirelated organisations Local CouncillorIdecisionmakers Mern bersivolunteers Timescale Unknown Contact Ralph Gaines London Wildlife Trust 0171 278 661213 __-______-_I ~ ---^_---_--__-+_-- +"." ---I--7-_-_+ 01 '20198 Page 27 LOCAURECIONAL BlODlVERSlTY ACTION PLANS Plan name UnKfiOVIC Ref. No. Area ilmpsnire county Region SCUTH EAST Organisations involved Role Hampshire Wildlife Trust Caord!nating Hampshire County Council Coordinating Local Authorities Funding Engllsh Nature ' Env Age Source of information RSPB Source of information CLA NFU CPRE.FA.FE Purpose Set targets for existing work Identify priorities Coordinate partners Audience General public Local CouncillorIdecision makers Timescale First drafi Audit planned summer 1998 Contact Patrick Cloughley Hampshire and IOWWildlife Trust 01 703 61 3737 -___ , _____.__x """ ____---I_--_____-__I ___-_I ---_ ~ "....
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Net Gain. Good Practice Principles for Development
    CIRIA C776b London, 2019 Biodiversity net gain. Good practice principles for development Case studies Tom Butterworth WSP Julia Baker Balfour Beatty Rachel Hoskin Footprint Ecology Griffin Court, 15 Long Lane, London, EC1A 9PN Tel: 020 7549 3300 Fax: 020 7549 3349 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ciria.org 12 Creation of Priest Hill Nature Reserve, Ewell, Surrey Details Organisations Surrey Wildlife Trust, Combined Counties Properties and CALA Homes Contact [email protected] / [email protected] 12.1 PROJECT SUMMARY At Priest Hill, Ewell a new 34 hectare nature reserve has been delivered through planning gain alongside a 1.7 hectare development of 15 residential homes from abandoned playing fields plus some previously- developed land. Before purchase the site had been largely abandoned inviting fly-tipping, arson and other urban fringe problems, while the potential diversity of its habitats (rank semi-improved grassland and scrub) was in decline. The original developer, Combined Counties Properties, Figure 12.1 Priest Hill nature reserve, Ewell, Surrey funded much of the priority habitat restoration and creation as well as providing a site manager’s house and maintenance base, as a significant BNG. Ownership of the reserve and associated buildings was transferred to Surrey Wildlife Trust ahead of development of the remainder of the site, marketed later by CALA Homes. Throughout the process, the Trust worked closely with the developers and the LPA, Epsom & Ewell Borough Council, to ensure the full potential of the site was realised. 12.2 ISSUES The site is located within the green belt so there was local resistance to any development, especially the policy-recommended affordable housing allocation (which was subsequently waived).
    [Show full text]
  • Trustees' Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 March 2019
    Registered Charity Number: 208123 Registered Company Number: 00645176 SURREY WILDLIFE TRUST TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 SURREY WILDLIFE TRUST TRUSTEES’ REPORT AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 _________________________________________________________________________________ Contents TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT: FOREWORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN, CHRIS WILKINSON ..................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, SARAH JANE CHIMBWANDIRA ................................. 3 STRATEGIC REPORT .............................................................................................................................................. 5 LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 17 STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 18 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE AND OVERVIEW ................................................................................. 19 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF SURREY WILDLIFE TRUST .............. 20 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES INCORPORATING AN INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT .......................................................................................................................................... 23 BALANCE SHEETS ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of SWT Plans to Deal with Ash
    West Surrey Badger Group, Surrey Dormouse Group and Surrey Bat Group views on the Surrey Wildlife Trust’s plan for Ash Dieback on their countryside estate. Context Ash Dieback (ADB) is a disease of ash trees caused by the fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus originating in Asia. It appeared first in Eastern Europe in about 1992 and has since moved westward, reaching the UK in 2012. It is now found across the entire UK, including Surrey, where most ash trees are believed to be infected. Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) is the third most common tree in England, and is found on most Surrey sites. ADB causes defoliation, crown dieback, and in many cases, leads to the death of the tree. The questions this raises are • Will all ash trees become infected? This seems very likely – most are probably already infected. • Will all ash trees show symptoms? Many will, although not necessarily all, and the severity will vary. Established, mature trees in mixed woodland seem least affected. • Will all ash trees die? This is uncertain. Across Europe, based on studies over the past 20 years, maximum mortality figures so far for natural woodland (as against plantations) seem to be around 70% (Ref 1). • How quickly will this happen? Again this is uncertain. It varies according to local conditions, the state and make-up of the woodland and the weather. Given around 30% of trees are still alive after up to 20 years, it won’t happen all at once, but trees are already showing symptoms in Surrey. A study in France & Belgium showed that for trees >25cm, annual mortality reached 3.2% after 8-9 years of pathogen presence, while for trees >5cm but<25cm it was ~10%.
    [Show full text]
  • Version 3 | July 2018 Contents
    Volunteer handbook Version 3 | July 2018 Contents 3. Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust 4. About Surrey Wildlife Trust 5. What is volunteering 6. Volunteer roles & responsibilities 7. Important information 9. The social aspect 10. Map of managed sites 11. Site list Contact details The Volunteer Development Team, Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0JN © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2018 Registered Charity No 208123 Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust! Now you have signed up to volunteering, you will be part of a network of volunteers who help the Trust to make a real difference for nature You could be... SAVING THREATENED HABITATS… SURVEYING PROTECTED SPECIES INSPIRING A THE NEXT GENERAtion… RAISING AWARENESS IN YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY Volunteers are an important and valued part of Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT) and this is your chance to make a real contribution to local conservation. We hope that you enjoy volunteering with us and feel part of our team. Founded by volunteers in 1959 the same ideals still remain at the core of the organisation today, with volunteers working alongside our staff in just about every aspect of the Trust. The partnership between the Trust and its volunteers has enabled us to advance nature conservation and awareness in the county and we are committed to continuing this vital work. This handbook has been produced by the Volunteer Development team and includes the main information you’ll need to know about volunteering with Surrey Wildlife Trust. Welcome and thank you for your support! Surrey Wildlife Trust Volunteer Handbook | 3 About Surrey Wildlife Trust Surrey Wildlife Trust is committed to helping wildlife to survive and thrive across the county Surrey Wildlife Trust is one of 46 Wildlife Trusts working across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation to Climate Change Sustainable Local Economies Abundant Wildlife Healthy Cities and Green Space for All
    A living landscape A call to restore the UK’s battered ecosystems, for wildlife and people Adaptation to climate change Sustainable local economies Abundant wildlife Healthy cities and green space for all Updated with 100+ Living Landscape schemes So much of the UK now is packed with development Fenton/BBC Beatrice and wildlife is in retreat. There are many fine nature A LIVING LANDSCAPE reserves but our future must be to integrate human and natural communities and restore a better balance. This document lays out exciting and important new plans. Professor Aubrey Manning OBE President of The Wildlife Trusts Matthew Roberts. Cover picture: St Ives and the river Great Ouse, Cambridgshire, Dae Sasitorn/lastrefuge.co.uk Dae Cambridgshire, Ouse, Great river the and Ives St picture: Cover Roberts. Matthew Where will our water come from? When will our land use become truly sustainable? How can our environment adapt to climate change? What would it take to rebuild a wildlife-rich countryside? Why are so many people disconnected from nature? Priestcliffe Lees nature reserve, owned by Derbyshire Wildlife Trust: a treasure chest of local biodiversity. The Wildlife Trusts see such places as nodes from It’s time to think big which plants and animals can recolonise a recovering landscape To adapt to climate change, the UK’s wildlife will need to move Driven by local people and aspirations, The Wildlife Trusts play along ‘climate corridors’ up and down the country, or to shadier a leading role not just in developing the vision but in mustering slopes or cooler valleys. Wildlife has done it all before, after the the support that can allow communities to drive their own last ice age, but this time the change is faster and there are change.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Wood White and Other Wildlife the Wood White Is One of the UK’S Rarest and Most Threatened Butterflies
    Wood White courtship courtship White Wood Saving the Wood White and other Wildlife The Wood White is one of the UK’s rarest and most threatened butterflies. It is also one of the most delicate and charismatic. This area (below) is the only place in South East England where the Wood White butterfly survives (the next nearest colony is on the Northamptonshire border). 34 other butterfly species also live here, plus of course bees, reptiles and all sorts of other wildlife. Conservation Gu ided walks Work Parties Hands -on butterfly habitat Training in seed creation collection and propagation Training in Butterfly & Bee Identification Opportunities to get involved in real science Specialist Habitat Management Advice Plug -planting sessions In January we will be applying to the Heritage Lottery Fund to help us fund a project to help secure the Wood White in this area. We aim to plant and sow a total of 3km of butterfly and bee-friendly flower strips which will provide valuable ‘stepping-stones’ for the Wood White and other wildlife. We hope to work with landowners and managers, gardeners and the local communities to achieve our goals. We’re developing this project in discussion with Kew and the Millennium Seedbank , Natural England , Forestry Commission England , Surrey Wildlife Trust , Sussex Wildlife Trust , the Amphibian and Reptile Trust , the National Trust , the Woodland Trust , Buglife , the Weald Meadows Partnership , Colin Reader Wild Flower Lawns and Meadows , and Hazelwood Landscapes (“the Butterfly Brothers”) and we hope to work with many of these organisations and with local people to deliver this exciting and inspiring project.
    [Show full text]
  • BAP Riverfly Interim Report 2009-10
    BAP Riverfly Interim Report 2009-10 Vicky Kindemba & Bridget Peacock Acknowledgement to Natural England Countdown 2010, the Riverfly Partnership Species and Habitat Group, partner organisations and a wide number of individuals and volunteers. Surveys coordinated by The Riverfly Partnership and Buglife - The Invertebrate Conservation Trust. The Riverfly Partnership operates within The Salmon & Trout Association. VK / BP v2 9/6/2010 Contents 1. Northern February red Brachyptera putata ..............................................................3 1.1. River Dee - March 2010 onwards - David Pryce ..............................................3 1.2. River Dee - Feb / March 2009 - David Pryce/Craig Macadam..........................3 2. Small grey sedge Glossosoma intermedium ............................................................4 2.1. Cumbria - March 2009 – Ian Wallace / Andrew Dixon ......................................4 2.2. Cumbria - March 2010 - Andrew Dixon ............................................................4 2.3. Cumbria - August 2009 - Andrew Dixon / Ian Wallace.....................................4 3. Window winged sedge Hagenella clathrata ............................................................6 3.1. June 2009 - Surrey - Ian Wallace / Graham Vicks / Daniel Atter ......................6 4. Scarce brown sedge Ironoquia dubia ......................................................................7 4.1. Summer 2009 – Winter 2010 Hampshire & Berkshire Graham Vicks.............7 5. Yellow Mayfly Potamanthus luteus ..........................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 6: North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog's Back ND02: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Guildford to the Mole Gap ND03: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Mole Gap to Reigate ND04: North Downs; Epsom Downs to Nonsuch Park ND05: North Downs; Banstead Woods & Downs and Chipstead Downs ND06: North Downs Scarp; Quarry Hangers to the A22 ND07: North Downs Scarp; Woldingham ND08: North Downs; Banstead & Walton Heaths September 2019 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog’s Back Local authorities: Guildford, Waverley Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Realising BOA aims will contribute to UK commitments to halt biodiversity declines, and their recognition directly meets current National Planning Policy Framework policy to plan strategically for the enhancement of the natural environment; to be achieved by providing net gains for biodiversity and establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 170). Designation of BOAs also fulfils NPPF requirements to identify, map and safeguard components of wider ecological networks, and areas identified for habitat management, enhancement, restoration or creation (para.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvest Mouse Project Report
    Surrey Harvest Mouse Project Report for People’s Trust for Endangered Species David Williams CMIEEM January 2015 Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0JN 1 The Harvest Mouse (Micromys minutus) project began in 2011 as a result of a successful application for funding to People’s Trust for Endangered Species. Surrey Wildlife Trust also part funded the project. Although populations are reported to have declined by 71% (Sargent et al 1997) very little successful survey work has been undertaken in Surrey. Lack of survey information about Harvest mice numbers is probably due to the ineffectiveness of survey and trapping techniques (Riordan et al 2009; Poulton and Turner 2009 and Meek 2011). Nest searches can be overestimated with Harvest mice building several nests for each brood (R.C.Trout and S.Harris, Mammals of Great Britain 2008). The project used several types of surveys and different trapping methods. The aims were to enhance our knowledge and status of the species (which would inform management plans to ensure sensitively managed habitats) and raise public awareness of the conservation status of the Harvest mouse, using them as a flagship species to promote landscape scale conservation of floodplain grazing. These aims would be achieved by trapping, nest surveys, owl pellet dissection, positioning hair tubes and camera traps. We trialled three types of small mammal live traps at two different heights (one being at floor level). Nest searches were undertaken and owl pellets were collected and dissected to search for Harvest mice remains. Hair tubes were trialled at various heights, along with trail cameras placed in the stork zone.
    [Show full text]