Not Unmindful of the Future

SPRING 2014 A MAGAZINE OF STUDENT THOUGHT AND OPINION VOL XVI, NO. 3 Not Unmindful of the Future Inside: Exclusive Interview with Dr. J.D. Futch, Legendary W&L History Professor Stories on Administrative Growth, Junior Housing, Admissions, Study Drugs, and More Dear Readers, We thank you for reading our frst two issues this year, and we believe that this issue will prove just as insightful and important in the grand scheme of W&L life. In reviving Te Spectator earlier this year, we sensed a need for an independent publication on this campus, a publication that would re- port on the real issues the university faces in this age of liberal propaganda and political correctness, a publication run by students that would challenge the prevailing views of an administration bent on redefning Washington and Lee. You will not fnd stories like ours in any other campus publication We sense that W&L is at a crossroads. Many students believe that the school they will return to for their 20th reunion will not be the same school they currently attend. Ours is a school of tradition, but we do not defend tradition for its own sake. Rather, we seek to preserve the best ideals of our university even while necessity demands that it adapt to the challenges of the 21st century. As W&L adds new programs and initiatives, it is important that it not be unmindful of the future, but it is also important that it preserves the best values of its past, the values that built this University. Te values of a liberal arts institution, and yes, the values of W&L, are threatened by the administration’s recent actions. Tis administration has imposed a third-year housing requirement against the will of an overwhelming majority of students, it has engaged in less-than-forthright admissions prac- tices, and it is only getting bigger. Will W&L remain the proud, unique institution it once was, or will it become some second rate Amherst, Swarthmore, or Bowdoin? Only time will tell, but the signs do not appear good. As you peruse the following pages, we ask you to not be unmindful of the future. Sincerely, Te Editorial Staf of Te Spectator Te Spectator is an independent magazine and does not receive any University funding. If you would like to make a donation or subscribe for $25 a year, please email [email protected] VOLUME XVI, ISSUE 3 SPRING 2014 Editor-in-Chief Paul Lagarde ‘16 Letter From Te Editorial Staf . Inside Cover Publisher Administration Growth .............................. 2-3 Catherine Roach ‘16 Libby Sutherland Executive Editor Christian Von Hassell ‘16 Letter to the Board of Trustees ....................... 4 Assisstant Editor An Addendum to Te Spectator’s “Letter to the Board of Marshall Woodward ‘16 Trustees” ........................................... 5 Managing Editor Ty Mitchell ‘16 Christian Von Hassell Copy Editor Letters to the Editor ................................6-7 Andrew Fox ‘16 Te Most Dangerous Game: W&L Admissions Policy. .8-9 Treasurer Nicholas Luther ‘14 Paul Lagarde and Marshall Woodward Business Manager General Opinion ................................... 10 Lat Peak ‘15 Digital Manager Interview with Dr. Jeferson Davis Futch . 12-13 Blake Odom ‘16 Satirical Spectator .................................. 14 Writers Ben Atnipp ‘15 Andrew Fox Jack Gaiennie ‘15 Libby Sutherland ‘15 Administration’s Top Ten Ideas for the SAE House . 15 Publishing Assistant Unprescribed Study Drug Usage Should Not Be Considered Brian Krouskos ‘16 an Honor Violation .................................. 16 Logistics Manager Thomas Dunbar ‘16 Blake Odom Photographer Te Case Against Study Drugs ....................... 17 Padget Sutherland ‘17 By Jack Gaiennie and Ben Atnipp Contributors An Interview with Alvin Townley ‘97 . 18-20 Price Bohrer ‘14 Liza Georges ‘16 Carissa Steichen ‘16 Email: [email protected] Web:washingtonandleespectator.com The Spectator is wholly produced by students of Washington and Lee University and welcomes Letters to the Editor which can be sent to the above email adress. Increase in Administrators and Tuition Cause for Concern By Libby Sutherland increased by 30% in that same time period. Price also In recent times, colleges and universities have em- cited technological changes, necessary increase of hu- braced the notion that more administrators, more pro- man resource management, and external mandates as gramming, and more initiatives must necessarily be a other reasons for administration growth. good thing. However, because of these fancy new “im- provements,” tuition has hiked, yet students have not According to a study conducted by Jay P. Greene at reaped any signifcant academic benefts despite this the Goldwater Institute, the number of full-time admin- ever-increasing cost. As we review the changing nature istrators per 100 students at America’s leading universi- of academia, we must ask ourselves: is it really worth it? ties grew by 39 percent between 1993 and 2007 while the number of employees engaged in teaching, research According to the National Center for Education Sta- or service only grew by 18 percent. Infation-adjusted tistics, the average admission cost for private four-year spending on administration per student increased by institutions has risen by 49% over the last decade. At 61 percent during the same period, while instructional Washington and Lee, tuition between the years 2000 spending per student rose 39 percent. and 2010 has more than doubled, however. Tis dou- bling in tuition has been mirrored by many of our peers W&L’s institutional research for the academic year of as well, refecting an unsettling trend in higher educa- 2011-2012 lists a total number of 267 full time instruc- tion today as top universities engage in a never-ending tional staf members compared to 278 administrative competition to raise their price tags, perhaps in an ef- staf members. Price said that the records for 2013-14 fort to artifcially increase their perceived value. show numbers of 253 full time instructional faculty and “a total of 40 individuals with faculty status, which Certainly there are a number of contributing factors would include librarians and coaches among several to increasing tuition rates, but perhaps none explain the other occupations, that serve in an administrative roles rise in tuition better than the administrative bloat af- full-time. Although they have faculty status, they are fecting so many universities today, including W&L. not full-time instructional faculty, and most of them do not act in a supervisory role over other faculty.” Bryan Price, the Assistant Provost and Director of In- stitutional Efectiveness at Washington and Lee, main- Between the years of 2012 and 2013, the Institutional tains that administration growth is necessary in order Efectiveness reports no longer counted University ad- to accommodate the number of enrolled students in- ministrators and professionals in the same category, creasing by about 275 – 300 students over the past 20 years. He said that management personnel at W&L has 2 / THE SPECTATOR SPRING 2014 expected but when these increases sake of adding to an already large instead dividing into two sepa- are several times the rate of infation administration. rate categories: “executive/admin- there should be a call for change. istrative/managerial” and “other According to Bain & Company’s professionals (support/service).” Te Sustainable University, “Many Even afer this distinction, the re- institutions have operated on the as- port for Fall 2012 shows a number sumption that the more they build, of 101 employees in executive/ad- spend, diversify and expand, the ministrative/managerial positions. more they will persist and prosper. According to Price, the student to But instead, the opposite has hap- professor ratio is 8:1 and the student pened: Institutions have become to administration ratio is 21:1, but overleveraged.” it is unclear whether the latter ratio is representative of the much higher When new administrative pro- number of administrative faculty grams are created, old similar pro- listed on the institutional research grams are ofen still lef running re- reports or the lower number that sulting in confusion and complexity Price provided. that makes efciency difcult. Ad- ditionally, many school adminis- Te greater implications of bu- trations include an unnecessary reaucratic infation include a shif of hierarchy, the staple of all good resources and attention away from bureaucracies—too many middle- teaching towards a body of admin- men tasked with too few essential istrators who “do little to advance responsibilities. the central mission of universities,” according to Benjamin Ginsberg, Aside from the fnancial stand- a professor of Political Science at point, the imbalanced proportion Johns Hopkins University. Essen- of professor growth rate to admin- tially, the imbalance in administra- istrative growth rate could impair tive growth compared to professor students’ experiences. Our Univer- growth means more staf-induced sity’s most recent change involves programs and not enough profes- an expensive third year housing sors to accommodate students. plan while other issues such as the students’ wavering ability to register Students spend multiple days of a for their frst choice classes go over- given week in classes with their pro- looked. Te administration works fessors and are much more likely to to shape the vision and organization have a closer relationship with them of the University but administra- than administrators. Yet at most tive bloat can harm their efciency. schools, professors have little say in Tough change and improvement decisions regarding issues such as of Student Afairs is important, tuition, admission policies, and the academics should be at the heart of size of the student body. our values. We should think care- fully about what it means to forgo Yearly tuition increases are to be hiring another professor for the SPRING 2014 THE SPECTATOR / 3 Editor’s Note: Tis Letter was written to the Board of Trustees prior to their February meeting.

Load more