DOCSLIB.ORG

Association Between the CD24 Ala57val Polymorphism and Risk For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Association Between the CD24 Ala57val Polymorphism and Risk For OPEN Association between the CD24 Ala57Val SUBJECT AREAS: polymorphism and risk for multiple GENETICS RESEARCH RISK FACTORS sclerosis and systemic lupus MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS erythematosus: a meta-analysis Received Jian Huang*, Yaqi Yang*, Zibin Liang, Miaomiao Kang, Ying Kuang & Feng Li 9 September 2014 Accepted Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 3 March 2015 Published The cluster of differentiation 24 (CD24) Ala57Val polymorphism has been implicated as a risk factor for 1 April 2015 multiple sclerosis (MS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, genetic studies have produced controversial results. A meta-analysis was performed on this topic. We used odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to investigate the strength of association. Eleven studies from nine publications Correspondence and consisting of 2466 cases and 2650 controls were included. The results suggested that the CD24 Val/Val 5 requests for materials genotypes were associated with an increased risk of MS in all study subjects and Caucasians (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.68–3.10, P , 0.001 and OR 5 2.30, 95% CI: 1.66–3.20, P , 0.001, respectively). Sensitivity analysis should be addressed to z z showed that no individual study was found to be significantly biasing the pooled results. Although F.L. ([email protected]. meta-analysis also suggested an association between the CD24 Val/Val genotypes and SLE risk in Caucasians edu.cn) (OR 5 1.71, 95% CI: 1.31–2.24, Pz , 0.001), sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the association was not statistically significant after removing a Spanish study. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the CD24 Ala57Val polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of MS in Caucasians. However, the * These authors available evidence is not sufficient to support an association between the CD24 Ala57Val polymorphism and contributed equally to SLE risk. this work. ultiple sclerosis (MS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are autoimmune diseases mediated by self-reactive T cells and other cells of the adaptive and innate immune systems1,2. MS is characterized by M chronic inflammation, multifocal demyelination and axon loss that affect the central nervous system (CNS), whereas in SLE, inflammation and tissue damage can involve many organs and systems, including the skin, lungs, kidneys, and CNS. Although the etiology of these diseases remains largely unknown, it is apparent that both genetic and environmental factors play a role3. Human genetic studies have shown that the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene on chromosome 6p21 is the most important genetic factor for MS and SLE3. In MS, the HLA- DR15 haplotype (DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602) and its individual alleles appear to have the main role in Caucasians4. In SLE, the HLA-DR2 and DR3 alleles and the Class III variants are important genetic susceptibility factors for the disease5. However, the HLA complex does not fully explain the genetic susceptibility in these diseases. Recent advances in molecular genetic technologies have led to identification of many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) outside the HLA region for MS and SLE6,7. The exploration of non-HLA genetic risk loci may help elucidate signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MS and SLE, and provide insight into genes and mechanisms shared among autoimmune diseases. Cluster of differentiation 24 (CD24) is a small cell surface protein molecule anchored by glycosyl-phospho- tidyl-inositol (GPI) in a wide variety of cell types, including T cells, B cells, dendritic cells (DCs), cancer cells and local antigen-presenting cells in the CNS8–12. CD24 has been implicated in a CD28-independent costimulatory pathway in the activation of CD41 and CD81 T cells13. It also functions as an important regulator during the early stages of B and T cell lymphopoiesis14. In addition, CD24 modulates the interaction between very late antigen (VLA)-4 and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-115. These adhesion molecules play an important role in lymphocyte costimulation and migration to sites of inflammation. The human CD24 gene, which maps on 6q21, is considered a candidate gene for MS and SLE. A C . T single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is located in the presumable GPI-anchor cleavage site of the CD24 protein (rs52812045), leading to the replacement of an alanine (CD24 Ala) by a valine (CD24 Val) (Ala57Val)16. According to the data provided by the National Center SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 5 : 9557 | DOI: 10.1038/srep09557 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports for Biotechnology Information Entrez SNP, the Val allele frequency Results is 0.320 in a population from Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Characteristics of published studies. A flow diagram showing the Human pedigrees. Several studies have investigated the relationship selection process of studies included in the present analysis is shown 17–25 of the CD24 Ala57Val polymorphism with MS and SLE ; how- in Fig. 1. After title and abstract evaluation, 273 publications were ever, results from individual studies are not consistent. This likely excluded either because they were irrelevant, not about human stems from several facors, including underpowered sample sizes, subjects, or the record was a duplicate search result. Five publications ethnic differences and minor genetic effects. We therefore performed were excluded after evaluating the remaining 14 publications in their a meta-analysis of published case-control studies to evaluate the entirety. Overall, 11 studies from nine publications met our inclusion association between the CD24 Ala57Val polymorphism and risk criteria with a total of 2466 cases and 2650 controls17–25.Intermsof for MS and SLE. disease, six studies with 899 cases and 1127 controls evaluated the association between the CD24 Ala57Val polymorphism and MS 17–19,21,23,24 Methods risk , whereas five studies with 1567 cases and 1523 controls Search strategy and identification of studies. An electronic search of the medical from three publications assessed the relationship of this SNP with 20,22,25 literature was conducted to identify genetic association studies assessing the SLE . It was noteworthy that the study by Sa´nchez et al. included relationship of the CD24 Ala57Val polymorphism with MS and SLE. PubMed, three cohorts: a Spanish cohort,aGermancohortandaSwedish Scopus, Web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and cohort20. In terms of ethnicity, nine studies from seven publications Wanfang databases were searched for papers published until January 2015 without were undertaken in Cancasians17,19–24, whereas two studies were language restrictions. Search terms included ‘‘multiple sclerosis’’, ‘‘MS’’, ‘‘systemic 18,25 lupus erythematosus’’, ‘‘SLE’’, ‘‘cluster of differentiation 24’’, ‘‘CD24’’, ‘‘genetics’’, conducted in Asians . The Val allele frequency in controls ranged ‘‘polymorphism’’, ‘‘SNP’’, ‘‘rs52812045’’, and ‘‘association’’. The reference lists of from 23.8% to 31.0% among Caucasian studies, and the pooled retrieved publications were also reviewed to identify other relevant studies missed by frequency was 27.6 (95% CI: 25.7–29.5). Table 1 summarizes the the database search. The following inclusion criteria were used for study selection: (1) characteristics of the eligible studies included in this meta-analysis. case-control design; (2) genotype frequency data for both cases and controls were available; (3) literature published in English or Chinese. Studies were excluded if they CD24 met the following criteria: (1) studies on animal populations; (2) no control subjects; Association between the Ala57Val polymorphism and MS. (3) duplicate data; (4) insufficient data. Reviewers screened study reports by first For this polymorphism, five studies containing 816 cases and 1017 screening titles and abstracts to select publications for full-text evaluation, then controls were undertaken in Caucasians, whereas one study with 83 screening full-text publications to confirm eligibility of the studies. cases and 110 controls were conducted in Asians. Genotype-specific – , odds ratios OR1, OR2, and OR3 were 2.47 (95% CI: 1.79 3.40, Pz Data extraction. Data were extracted by two of the authors, and differences were – 5 – 0.001), 1.17 (95% CI: 0.97 1.42, Pz 0.104), and 2.09 (95% CI: 1.51 resolved by consensus. For each study, the following data were extracted: first author , name, publication year, country, ethnicity, disease, sample size, genotypic frequencies 2.90, Pz 0.001), respectively. These genotype-specific ORs were of the CD24 Ala57Val SNP, diagnostic criteria and genotyping method. We assumed most suggestive of a recessive model (Val/Val vs Ala/Val 1 Ala/ study subjects to be Caucasians, if Caucasians comprised 90% of the subjects. When a Ala). In this model, meta-analysis demonstrated a significant publication reported results on different subpopulations according to country, each association between the CD24 Ala57Val polymorphism and MS risk subpopulation was considered as a separate study in this meta-analysis. 5 – , in all study subjects (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.68 3.10, Pz 0.001) Methodological quality assessment. The quality of selected studies was assessed by (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Subgroup analysis according to ethnicity scoring according to the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) (www.ohri.ca/programs/ demonstrated a significant association between the CD24 Ala57Val clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp), awarding points based on selection of cases
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANKRD55 and DHCR7 Are Novel Multiple Sclerosis Risk Loci
    Genes and Immunity (2012) 13, 253 --257 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1466-4879/12 www.nature.com/gene ORIGINAL ARTICLE ANKRD55 and DHCR7 are novel multiple sclerosis risk loci I Alloza1,14, D Otaegui2,14, A Lopez de Lapuente1, A Antigu¨ edad3, J Varade´ 4,CNu´n˜ez4, R Arroyo5, E Urcelay4, O Fernandez6, L Leyva6, M Fedetz7, G Izquierdo8, M Lucas9, B Oliver-Martos6, A Alcina7, A Saiz10, Y Blanco10, M Comabella11, X Montalban11, J Olascoaga12, F Matesanz7,8,14 and K Vandenbroeck1,13,14 Multiple sclerosis (MS) shares some risk genes with other disorders hallmarked by an autoimmune pathogenesis, most notably IL2RA and CLEC16A. We analyzed 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nine risk genes, which recently emerged from a series of non-MS genome-wide association studies (GWAS), in a Spanish cohort comprising 2895 MS patients and 2942 controls. We identified two SNPs associated with MS. The first SNP, rs6859219, located in ANKRD55 (Chr5), was recently discovered in a meta-analysis of GWAS on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and emerged from this study with genome-wide significance (odds ratio (OR) ¼ 1.35; P ¼ 2.3 Â 10À9). The second SNP, rs12785878, is located near DHCR7 (Chr11), a genetic determinant of vitamin D insufficiency, and showed a size effect in MS similar to that recently observed in Type 1 diabetes (T1D; OR ¼ 1.10; P ¼ 0.009). ANKRD55 is a gene of unknown function, and is flanked proximally by the IL6ST-- IL31RA gene cluster. However, rs6859219 did not show correlation with a series of haplotype-tagging SNPs covering IL6ST--IL31RA, analyzed in a subset of our dataset (D0o 0.31; r2o 0.011).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Increasing Incidence in Relapsing-Remitting MS and High Rates Among Young Women in Finland: a Thirty-Year Follow-Up
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Hindawi Publishing Corporation Multiple Sclerosis International Volume 2014, Article ID 186950, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/186950 Research Article Increasing Incidence in Relapsing-Remitting MS and High Rates among Young Women in Finland: A Thirty-Year Follow-Up Marja-Liisa Sumelahti,1,2 Markus H. A. Holmberg,1 Annukka Murtonen,1 Heini Huhtala,3 and Irina Elovaara1,2 1 School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Arvo 312, 33014 Tampere, Finland 2 Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland 3 School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014 Tampere, Finland Correspondence should be addressed to Marja-Liisa Sumelahti; [email protected] Received 28 May 2014; Revised 23 September 2014; Accepted 9 October 2014; Published 9 November 2014 Academic Editor: Bianca Weinstock-Guttman Copyright © 2014 Marja-Liisa Sumelahti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Object. Gender and disease course specific incidences were studied in high- and medium-risk regions of MS in Finland. Methods. Age- and gender-specific incidences with 95% CIs were calculated in 10-year periods from 1981 to 2010. Poser diagnostic criteria were used and compared with the McDonald criteria from 2001 to 2010. Association between age and diagnostic delay over time was assessed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results. 1419 (89%) RRMS and 198 (11%) PPMS cases were included.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Safety of Mitoxantrone, As an Initial Therapy, in Multiple Sclerosis: Experience in an Indian Tertiary Care Setting
    Original Article Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone, as an initial therapy, in multiple sclerosis: Experience in an Indian tertiary care setting B. S. Singhal, Sheth Geeta, Shilpa G. Hundalani, Suresh Menon Department of Neurology, Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, India Abstract Background and Purpose: Mitoxantrone is an approved disease modifying agent for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to assess its efficacy and safety in Indian MS patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 23 patients with clinically definite MS (Poser criteria) were enrolled in an open label study. Of which, 21 satisfied the McDonald’s criteria for MS and two satisfied the diagnostic criteria of neuromyelitis optica (NMO). The numbers of relapses and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score were used as primary and secondary outcome measures. The patients were monitored for the adverse effects. Results: In 17 (15 MS and two NMO) patients who completed one year of therapy, there was significant difference in the mean annual relapse rates [before 0.879 6 0.58; on mitoxantrone 0.091 6 0.17, (P 5 0.003)]. Of the 17 patients, ten (MS 9 and NMO 1) completed therapy for two years. Annual relapse rates [before (1.024 6 0.59), on therapy (0.155 6 0.21), (P 5 0.0054)] and EDSS score [before start of therapy 5.3, at the end of therapy 2.4, (P 5 0.001)] showed significant benefit in the ten patients who completed Address for correspondence: Dr. B. S. Singhal, two years therapy. This benefit persisted during the mean follow-up period of two and a Bombay Hospital Institute of half years after completion of therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Remitting and Primary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Effectiveness and Value
    Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing- Remitting and Primary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Effectiveness and Value Draft Evidence Report November 22, 2016 Prepared for ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2016 ICER Staff and Consultants University of Washington School of Pharmacy Modeling Group Jeffrey A. Tice, MD Marita Zimmermann, MPH, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine Research Fellow University of California, San Francisco Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy Rick Chapman, PhD, MS University of Washington Director of Health Economics Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Elizabeth Brouwer, MPH Graduate Student Varun Kumar, MBBS, MPH, MSc Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Health Economist Program, Department of Pharmacy Institute for Clinical and Economic Review University of Washington Anne M. Loos, MA Josh J. Carlson, PhD, MPH Senior Research Associate Associate Professor Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy Shanshan Liu, MS, MPH University of Washington Research Associate Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Matt Seidner, BS Program Manager The role of the University of Washington (UW) School of Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Pharmacy Modeling Group is limited to the development of the cost-effectiveness model, and the resulting ICER reports do not necessarily represent the views of the UW. Daniel A. Ollendorf, PhD Chief Scientific Officer Institute for Clinical and Economic Review David Rind, MD Chief Medical Officer Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc President Institute for Clinical and Economic Review DATE OF PUBLICATION: November 22, 2016 We would also like to thank Margaret Webb for her contributions to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Multiple Sclerosis
    Review Article Perspectives on Multiple Sclerosis Robert I. Grossman and Joseph C. McGowan There is no question that MR imaging is presently the sensitivity of MR imaging, as the study does not best method for imaging multiple sclerosis (MS); yet, include state-of-the art spinal cord imaging. Com- even today, MS remains a clinical diagnosis, with the bined brain and spinal cord imaging can increase the relationship between clinical course and MR findings sensitivity to almost 100% (19). still problematic (1, 2). MR imaging appears to be the MS is a disease characterized by a variety of clinical most important test performed in the diagnostic courses. Terminology regarding clinical classification workup of MS; it has much greater impact than CSF can be confusing and even contradictory (20). Relaps- analysis and evoked potential testing (3). It is far ing-remitting MS is the most common course of the more sensitive than a clinical examination in revealing disease, initially occurring in up to 85% of patients. disease activity, as MR abnormalities are found five Exacerbations are, at the beginning, followed by re- to 10 times more often than clinical abnormalities missions, but over a period of years, additional exac- detected by standard neurologic examination (4–8). erbations result in incomplete recovery. Within 10 In this review, we briefly summarize the clinical and years, 50% (and within 25 years, 90%) of these pa- pathologic hallmarks of MS and discuss the MR find- tients enter a progressive phase, termed secondary- ings in this disease, examining the strengths and progressive (or relapsing-progressive) MS, in which weakness of conventional imaging protocols in rela- deficits are progressive without much remission in the tion to their clinical utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Solution for Injection, Pre-Filled Syringe>
    Common Technical Document Glatiramer acetate 20 mg/mL Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe 1 NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT [Product name]<20 mg/mL><Solution for Injection, Pre-filled Syringe> 2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION 1 ml of solution for injection contains 20 mg glatiramer acetate*, equivalent to 18 mg of glatiramer base per pre-filled syringe. * The average molecular weight of glatiramer acetate is in the range of 5,000-9,000 daltons. Due to its compositional complexity, no specified polypeptide can be fully characterized in terms of amino acid sequence, although the final glatiramer acetate composition is not entirely random. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3 PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Solution for Injection, Pre-filled Syringe [Solution for Injection] Clear, colourless to slightly yellow/brownish solution free from visible particles. The solution for injection has a pH of 5.5 - 7.0 and an osmolarity of about 265 mOsmol/L. 4 CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Glatiramer acetate is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) (see Section 5.1 for important information on the population for which efficacy has been established). Glatiramer acetate is not indicated in primary or secondary progressive MS. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology The recommended dosage in adults is 20 mg of glatiramer acetate (one pre-filled syringe), administered as a subcutaneous injection once daily. At the present time, it is not known for how long the patient should be treated. A decision concerning long term treatment should be made on an individual basis by the treating physician.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
    Brain (1997), 120, 1085–1096 REVIEW ARTICLE Primary progressive multiple sclerosis A. J. Thompson,1 C. H. Polman,2 D. H. Miller,1 W. I. McDonald,1 B. Brochet,3 M. Filippi,4 X. Montalban5 and J. De Sa´6 1Department of Clinical Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Correspondence to: Alan J. Thompson, The National London, UK, 2Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Hospital, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3Departement de Neurologie, Hoˆpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Bordeaux, France, 4Department of Neurology, Scientific Institute, Ospedale San Raffaele, University of Milan, Italy, 5Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain and 6Servic¸o de Neurologia, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal Summary Patients with multiple sclerosis who develop progressive disability and the role of MRI in monitoring disease activity disability from onset without relapses or remissions pose in this clinical subgroup require elucidation, particularly in difficulties in diagnosis, monitoring of disease activity and view of the lack of change on conventional imaging in the treatment. There is a need to define the diagnostic criteria presence of continuing clinical deterioration. The prognosis for this group more precisely and, in particular, to describe is poor and there are currently no treatment trials for this a comprehensive battery of investigations to exclude other form of the disease. conditions. The mechanisms underlying the development of Keywords: multiple sclerosis; primary progressive; diagnosis Abbreviation: HLA 5 human lymphocyte antigen Introduction Multiple sclerosis is classically characterized by a relapsing/ disease both immunologically and pathologically. Indeed the remitting course due to lesions in many parts of the CNS, question arises as to whether this may be a separate disease with the majority of patients developing progressive disability entity or part of the broad spectrum of multiple sclerosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Tables
    Drug Class Review on Disease-modifying drugs for Multiple Sclerosis Final Report Evidence Tables July 2007 The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has not yet seen or approved this report A scan of the medical literature is done periodically The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Marian McDonagh, PharmD Tracy Dana, MLS Benjamin KS Chan, MS Sujata Thakurta, MPA-HA Andrew Gibler Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Oregon Health & Science University Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Copyright © 2007 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97239. All rights reserved. Note: A scan of the medical literature relating to the topic is done periodically (see http://www.ohsu.edu/ohsuedu/research/policycenter/DERP/about/methods.cfm for scanning process description). Upon review of the last scan, the Drug Effectiveness Review Project governance group elected not to proceed with another full update of this report. Some portions of the report may not be up to date. Final Report Evidence Tables Drug Effectiveness Review Project Table of Contents Evidence Table 1. Systematic reviews of disease-modifying drugs................................... 3 Evidence Table 2. Head-to-head trials of β interferons .................................................... 18 Evidence Table 3. Effectiveness and adverse events in head-to-head trials of β interferons ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    CLINICAL TRIALS SECTION EDITOR: IRA SHOULSON, MD Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment Following the First Demyelinating Event Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Anat Achiron, MD, PhD; Irena Kishner, MD; Ida Sarova-Pinhas, MD; Havi Raz, BA; Meir Faibel, MD; Yael Stern, MD; Mor Lavie, MA; M. Gurevich, PhD; Mark Dolev, MD; David Magalashvili, MD; Yoram Barak, MD Background: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has cally definite multiple sclerosis was significantly lower been reported to reduce disease activity in patients with in the IVIg treatment group compared with the placebo relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We assessed the group (rate ratio, 0.36 [95% confidence interval, 0.15- effect of IVIg treatment in patients after the first neuro- 0.88]; P=.03). Patients in the IVIg treatment group had logical event suggestive of demyelinative disease and a significant reduction in the volume and number of T2- evaluated the occurrence of a second attack and dissemi- weighted lesions and in the volume of gadolinium- nation in time demonstrated by brain magnetic reso- enhancing lesions as compared with the placebo group nance imaging within the first year from onset. (P=.01, P=.01, and P=.03, respectively). Treatment was well tolerated, compliance was high, and incidence of ad- Methods: We conducted a randomized, placebo- verse effects did not differ significantly between groups. controlled, double-blind study in 91 eligible patients en- rolled within the first 6 weeks of neurological symp- Conclusions: Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment toms. Patients were randomly assigned to receive IVIg for the first year from onset of the first neurological event treatment (2-g/kg loading dose) or placebo, with boost- suggestive of demyelinative disease significantly lowers ers (0.4 g/kg) given once every 6 weeks for 1 year.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING the DIAGNOSIS of MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS J Palace *Ii3
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71(suppl II):ii3–ii8 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.71.suppl_2.ii3 on 1 December 2001. Downloaded from MAKING THE DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS J Palace *ii3 uspected cases of multiple sclerosis (MS) are usually young adults attending the neurology outpatient clinic. The onset of symptoms is rare before puberty or after the age of 60 years; Showever, being a relatively common neurological disease (1:800 in UK), both situations may be familiar to practising neurologists. MS will usually present with either a history of acute relapse(s) or with progressive neurological impairment c RELAPSING REMITTING DISEASE The most common presentation of MS is following a relapse. The peak age of the first episode is in the third decade; however, patients often present to the neurologist later with their second or third relapse or less commonly in the secondary progressive phase of illness. This form of MS is twice as common in women as in men. The most common scenario is a patient of 20–40 years old referred fairly urgently to the outpatient clinic with a subacute onset of neurological disturbance, most commonly sensory symptoms, often resolving by the time they are seen. Because sensory symptoms may occur in the absence of clinical signs the neurological examination may be normal or near normal even when seen during relapse. The distribution of sensory loss is extremely variable but most commonly involves one or more limbs and usually represents a partial transverse myelitis with an evolving copyright. sensory level (which may be patchy or unilateral).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Review Protocols Question 1 In
    Appendix 1_Review protocols Question 1 In patients with CIS (regardless of whether they fulfil criteria for MS), what is the benefit of starting treatment with a disease-modifying drug (DMD) compared to no treatment? Population Patients with a single clinical attacka, regardless of number of MRI lesions interferon beta/peg-interferon Interventions glatiramer acetate teriflunomide dimethyl fumarate fingolimod natalizumab alemtuzumab daclizumab ocrelizumab mitoxantrone Comparators Placebo or active comparator Outcomes Efficacy outcomes Relapse (time to second relapse, % of participants with second relapse) Disability worsening (measured on the EDSS) Conversion to clinically definite MS MRI outcomes New T2 lesions (presence of new T2/volume) GAD lesions (presence of gad/volume) Brain atrophy Tolerability and safety outcomes Discontinuation (any reason/due to side effects) Adverse events (specific events outlined for each drug – see appendix 7) Mortality Other outcomes Quality of life (patient reported) Cognitive impairment Exclusion Pediatric population, studies evaluating combination of drugs, unlicensed doses, studies with <10 participants per arm, non-English language Study design RCTs with at least 1 year follow-up (48 weeks acceptable) Long term extensions on included RCTs a. Clinical definition with slight variations between studies. Generally, first isolated, well-defined unifocal or multifocal neurologic event consistent with demyelination and involving the optic nerve (unilateral optic neuritis), spinal cord
    [Show full text]
  • INFLAMMATORY/POST-INFECTIOUS ENCEPHALOMYELITIS L Bennetto, N Scolding I22
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2003.034256 on 20 February 2004. Downloaded from INFLAMMATORY/POST-INFECTIOUS ENCEPHALOMYELITIS L Bennetto, N Scolding i22 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl I):i22–i28. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.034256 ost-infectious and inflammatory encephalomyelitis are broadly represented by the syn- drome acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). ADEM forms one of several Pcategories of primary inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system. Others include multiple sclerosis (MS), acute transverse myelitis, and Devic’s disease. It should be remembered that these are syndromically defined diseases at present. There are no diagnos- tic tests presently available short of brain biopsy, but future advances may reveal diagnostic biological markers of disease and in so doing dramatically advance the pathophysiological and therapeutic understanding of these conditions. A wholesale change in classification and nomenclature may well follow. In the meantime clinicians must remain keenly appreciative of subtle shades of grey: ADEM, first MS relapse, or ultimately benign clinically isolated syn- drome? The answers are relevant to prognosis and, more recently, selection of the correct therapeutic strategy. c ACUTE DISSEMINATED ENCEPHALOMYELITIS ADEM is an inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system that is usually monophasic, but a relapsing variant distinct from MS—multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis (MDEM) is well-described. ADEM is predominantly, though by no means copyright. exclusively, a disease of children and in particular infants. Historically it includes post- infectious encephalomyelitis and post-vaccination encephalomyelitis. While these two syndromes were distinguished by their precipitant it was realised that clinically and pathologically they were very similar.
    [Show full text]