INFLAMMATORY/POST-INFECTIOUS ENCEPHALOMYELITIS L Bennetto, N Scolding I22
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ANKRD55 and DHCR7 Are Novel Multiple Sclerosis Risk Loci
Genes and Immunity (2012) 13, 253 --257 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1466-4879/12 www.nature.com/gene ORIGINAL ARTICLE ANKRD55 and DHCR7 are novel multiple sclerosis risk loci I Alloza1,14, D Otaegui2,14, A Lopez de Lapuente1, A Antigu¨ edad3, J Varade´ 4,CNu´n˜ez4, R Arroyo5, E Urcelay4, O Fernandez6, L Leyva6, M Fedetz7, G Izquierdo8, M Lucas9, B Oliver-Martos6, A Alcina7, A Saiz10, Y Blanco10, M Comabella11, X Montalban11, J Olascoaga12, F Matesanz7,8,14 and K Vandenbroeck1,13,14 Multiple sclerosis (MS) shares some risk genes with other disorders hallmarked by an autoimmune pathogenesis, most notably IL2RA and CLEC16A. We analyzed 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nine risk genes, which recently emerged from a series of non-MS genome-wide association studies (GWAS), in a Spanish cohort comprising 2895 MS patients and 2942 controls. We identified two SNPs associated with MS. The first SNP, rs6859219, located in ANKRD55 (Chr5), was recently discovered in a meta-analysis of GWAS on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and emerged from this study with genome-wide significance (odds ratio (OR) ¼ 1.35; P ¼ 2.3 Â 10À9). The second SNP, rs12785878, is located near DHCR7 (Chr11), a genetic determinant of vitamin D insufficiency, and showed a size effect in MS similar to that recently observed in Type 1 diabetes (T1D; OR ¼ 1.10; P ¼ 0.009). ANKRD55 is a gene of unknown function, and is flanked proximally by the IL6ST-- IL31RA gene cluster. However, rs6859219 did not show correlation with a series of haplotype-tagging SNPs covering IL6ST--IL31RA, analyzed in a subset of our dataset (D0o 0.31; r2o 0.011). -
Research Article Increasing Incidence in Relapsing-Remitting MS and High Rates Among Young Women in Finland: a Thirty-Year Follow-Up
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Hindawi Publishing Corporation Multiple Sclerosis International Volume 2014, Article ID 186950, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/186950 Research Article Increasing Incidence in Relapsing-Remitting MS and High Rates among Young Women in Finland: A Thirty-Year Follow-Up Marja-Liisa Sumelahti,1,2 Markus H. A. Holmberg,1 Annukka Murtonen,1 Heini Huhtala,3 and Irina Elovaara1,2 1 School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Arvo 312, 33014 Tampere, Finland 2 Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland 3 School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014 Tampere, Finland Correspondence should be addressed to Marja-Liisa Sumelahti; [email protected] Received 28 May 2014; Revised 23 September 2014; Accepted 9 October 2014; Published 9 November 2014 Academic Editor: Bianca Weinstock-Guttman Copyright © 2014 Marja-Liisa Sumelahti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Object. Gender and disease course specific incidences were studied in high- and medium-risk regions of MS in Finland. Methods. Age- and gender-specific incidences with 95% CIs were calculated in 10-year periods from 1981 to 2010. Poser diagnostic criteria were used and compared with the McDonald criteria from 2001 to 2010. Association between age and diagnostic delay over time was assessed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results. 1419 (89%) RRMS and 198 (11%) PPMS cases were included. -
Practice Guideline: Disease-Modifying Therapies for Adults with Multiple Sclerosis
Practice guideline: Disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Alexander Rae-Grant, MD1; Gregory S. Day, MD, MSc2; Ruth Ann Marrie, MD, PhD3; Alejandro Rabinstein, MD4; Bruce A.C. Cree, MD, PhD, MAS5; Gary S. Gronseth, MD6; Michael Haboubi, DO7; June Halper, MSN, APN-C, MSCN8; Jonathan P. Hosey, MD9; David E. Jones, MD10; Robert Lisak, MD11; Daniel Pelletier, MD12; Sonja Potrebic, MD, PhD13; Cynthia Sitcov14; Rick Sommers, LMSW15; Julie Stachowiak, PhD16; Thomas S.D. Getchius17; Shannon A. Merillat, MLIS18; Tamara Pringsheim, MD, MSc19 1. Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, OH 2. Department of Neurology, Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 3. Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada 4. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 5. UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco 6. Department of Neurology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City 7. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, KY 8. Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Hackensack, NJ 9. Department of Neuroscience, St. Luke’s University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA 10. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 11. Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Hackensack, NJ, and Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 12. Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 13. Neurology Department, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser, Los Angeles 14. -
Efficacy and Safety of Mitoxantrone, As an Initial Therapy, in Multiple Sclerosis: Experience in an Indian Tertiary Care Setting
Original Article Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone, as an initial therapy, in multiple sclerosis: Experience in an Indian tertiary care setting B. S. Singhal, Sheth Geeta, Shilpa G. Hundalani, Suresh Menon Department of Neurology, Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, India Abstract Background and Purpose: Mitoxantrone is an approved disease modifying agent for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to assess its efficacy and safety in Indian MS patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 23 patients with clinically definite MS (Poser criteria) were enrolled in an open label study. Of which, 21 satisfied the McDonald’s criteria for MS and two satisfied the diagnostic criteria of neuromyelitis optica (NMO). The numbers of relapses and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score were used as primary and secondary outcome measures. The patients were monitored for the adverse effects. Results: In 17 (15 MS and two NMO) patients who completed one year of therapy, there was significant difference in the mean annual relapse rates [before 0.879 6 0.58; on mitoxantrone 0.091 6 0.17, (P 5 0.003)]. Of the 17 patients, ten (MS 9 and NMO 1) completed therapy for two years. Annual relapse rates [before (1.024 6 0.59), on therapy (0.155 6 0.21), (P 5 0.0054)] and EDSS score [before start of therapy 5.3, at the end of therapy 2.4, (P 5 0.001)] showed significant benefit in the ten patients who completed Address for correspondence: Dr. B. S. Singhal, two years therapy. This benefit persisted during the mean follow-up period of two and a Bombay Hospital Institute of half years after completion of therapy. -
Poliomyelitis and Polio-Encephalitis
POLIOMYELITIS AND POLIO-ENCEPHALITIS. 151 Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.2.22.151 on 1 July 1927. Downloaded from coryza, or gastro-intestinal symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhoea. The lymphatic glands are POLIOMYELITIS enlarged. The temperature rises, often ranging AND POLIO-ENCEPHALITIS.* between 101° and 103°F., and there is general malaise often accompanied by profuse sweating. BY In some cases both local and general symptoms are E. A. COCKAYNE, M.D. OXF., F.R.C.P. LOND., so slight that they may be overlooked and the PHYSICIAN TO THE MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL; PHYSICIAN rise of temperature may be very small. After TO OUT-PATIENTS, HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN, lasting from one to four days the illness may end GREAT ORMOND-STREET. at this stage. If it continues headache, drowsiness POLIOMYELITIS, like other specific fevers, has its and irritability, pain and stiffness in the back, special age and seasonal incidence; it is commonest accompanied sometimes by twitching of the in the late summer and early autumn, and the limbs or retraction of the head, may develop, and majority of its victims are children between the these indicate involvement of the meninges. ages of 1 and 5 years. The earliest symptoms are Hyperssthesia of skin and muscles may also be constitutional, malaise and fever, and in some prominent. Then if the grey matter of the central cases the involvement of the nervous system, to nervous system becomes infected, weakness, paresis, which it owes its name, never occurs. Such and paralysis of muscles develops. Paralyses cases are usually regarded as abortive, but in may appear to be dramatically sudden, but my opinion this view is not the correct one. -
SOS – Save Our Shoulders: a Guide for Polio Survivors
1 • Save Our Shoulders: A Guide for Polio Survivors A Guide for Polio Survivors S.O.S. Save Our Shoulders: A Guide for Polio Survivors by Jennifer Kuehl, MPT Roberta Costello, MSN, RN Janet Wechsler, PT Funding for the production of this manual was made possible by: The National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research Grant #H133A000101 and The U.S. Department of the Army Grant #DAMD17-00-1-0533 Investigators: Mary Klein, PhD Mary Ann Keenan, MD Alberto Esquenazi, MD Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the contributions and input provided from all of those who participated in our research. The time and effort of our participants was instrumental in the creation of this manual. Jennifer Kuehl, MPT Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia Roberta Costello, MSN, RN Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia Janet Wechsler, PT Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia Mary Klein, PhD Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia Mary Ann Keenan, MD University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Alberto Esquenazi, MD MossRehab Hospital, Philadelphia Cover and manual design by Ron Kalstein, MEd Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia Table of Contents 1. Introduction . .5 2. General Information About the Shoulder . .6 3. Facts About Shoulder Problems . .8 4. Treatment Options . .13 5. About Exercise . .16 6. Stretching Exercises . .19 7. Cane Stretches . .22 8. Strengthening Exercises . .25 9. Tips to Avoid Shoulder Problems . .29 10. Conclusion . .31 11. Resources . .31 The information contained within this manual is for reference only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Before beginning any exercise program consult your physician. Save Our Shoulders: A Guide for Polio Survivors • 4 Introduction Many polio survivors report new symptoms as they age. -
What Having Had Polio Causes, Might Cause and Does Not Cause Marny K
What Having Had Polio Causes, Might Cause and Does Not Cause Marny K. Eulberg, MD, Family Practice, Denver, Colorado Introduction: As time has elapsed since the major poliomyelitis epi- demics ended, following the widespread introduction of the polio vaccines, persons affected by polio, their families and their health- care providers seem to have less and less clear understanding about what symptoms are caused by polio, which are associated with polio and which are not. Many healthcare providers in practice today have had little experience or training in the care of polio survivors, and they studied the basic pathology that the poliovirus causes years ago. Organizations, such as Post-Polio Health International, which exist to provide information to polio survivors, are frequently asked questions Marny K. Eulberg, MD about various symptoms and the relationship to the acute polio. Post-polio groups and expert professionals have indicated that many individuals have been given incorrect or confusing information. Attributing symptoms or changes in symptoms and try to understand them. functioning to one’s previous polio Often a symptom can be caused by when the symptom is, in fact, due to many different mechanisms and a disease or condition that should be sometimes even by a combination treated by an entirely different medi- of factors. cal regime than polio/post-polio is not This article is not meant to be all- only not helpful but may be danger- inclusive and list every possible cause/ ous. Polio clinics can help with symp- disease but to discuss the most com- toms that are polio related and can mon and most frequent conditions. -
Remitting and Primary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Effectiveness and Value
Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing- Remitting and Primary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Effectiveness and Value Draft Evidence Report November 22, 2016 Prepared for ©Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, 2016 ICER Staff and Consultants University of Washington School of Pharmacy Modeling Group Jeffrey A. Tice, MD Marita Zimmermann, MPH, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine Research Fellow University of California, San Francisco Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy Rick Chapman, PhD, MS University of Washington Director of Health Economics Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Elizabeth Brouwer, MPH Graduate Student Varun Kumar, MBBS, MPH, MSc Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Health Economist Program, Department of Pharmacy Institute for Clinical and Economic Review University of Washington Anne M. Loos, MA Josh J. Carlson, PhD, MPH Senior Research Associate Associate Professor Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy Shanshan Liu, MS, MPH University of Washington Research Associate Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Matt Seidner, BS Program Manager The role of the University of Washington (UW) School of Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Pharmacy Modeling Group is limited to the development of the cost-effectiveness model, and the resulting ICER reports do not necessarily represent the views of the UW. Daniel A. Ollendorf, PhD Chief Scientific Officer Institute for Clinical and Economic Review David Rind, MD Chief Medical Officer Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc President Institute for Clinical and Economic Review DATE OF PUBLICATION: November 22, 2016 We would also like to thank Margaret Webb for her contributions to this report. -
Perspectives on Multiple Sclerosis
Review Article Perspectives on Multiple Sclerosis Robert I. Grossman and Joseph C. McGowan There is no question that MR imaging is presently the sensitivity of MR imaging, as the study does not best method for imaging multiple sclerosis (MS); yet, include state-of-the art spinal cord imaging. Com- even today, MS remains a clinical diagnosis, with the bined brain and spinal cord imaging can increase the relationship between clinical course and MR findings sensitivity to almost 100% (19). still problematic (1, 2). MR imaging appears to be the MS is a disease characterized by a variety of clinical most important test performed in the diagnostic courses. Terminology regarding clinical classification workup of MS; it has much greater impact than CSF can be confusing and even contradictory (20). Relaps- analysis and evoked potential testing (3). It is far ing-remitting MS is the most common course of the more sensitive than a clinical examination in revealing disease, initially occurring in up to 85% of patients. disease activity, as MR abnormalities are found five Exacerbations are, at the beginning, followed by re- to 10 times more often than clinical abnormalities missions, but over a period of years, additional exac- detected by standard neurologic examination (4–8). erbations result in incomplete recovery. Within 10 In this review, we briefly summarize the clinical and years, 50% (and within 25 years, 90%) of these pa- pathologic hallmarks of MS and discuss the MR find- tients enter a progressive phase, termed secondary- ings in this disease, examining the strengths and progressive (or relapsing-progressive) MS, in which weakness of conventional imaging protocols in rela- deficits are progressive without much remission in the tion to their clinical utility. -
Polio Fact Sheet
Polio Fact Sheet 1. What is Polio? - Polio is a disease caused by a virus that lives in the human throat and intestinal tract. It is spread by exposure to infected human stool: e.g. from poor sanitation practices. The 1952 Polio epidemic was the worst outbreak in the nation's history. Of nearly 58,000 cases reported that year, 3,145 people died and 21,269 were left with mild to disabling paralysis, with most of the victims being children. The "public reaction was to a plague", said historian William O'Neill. "Citizens of urban areas were to be terrified every summer when this frightful visitor returned.” A Polio vaccine first became available in 1955. 2. What are the symptoms of Polio? - Up to 95 % of people infected with Polio virus are not aware they are infected, but can still transmit it to others. While some develop just a fever, sore throat, upset stomach, and/or flu-like symptoms and have no paralysis or other serious symptoms, others get a stiffness of the back or legs, and experience increased sensitivity. However, a few develop life-threatening paralysis of muscles. The risk of developing serious symptoms increases with the age of the ill person. 3. Is Polio still a disease seen in the United States? - The last naturally occurring cases of Polio in the United States were in 1979, when an outbreak occurred among the Amish in several states including Pennsylvania. 4. What kinds of Polio vaccines are used in the United States? - There is now only one kind of Polio vaccine used in the United States: the Inactivated Polio vaccine (IPV) is given as an injection (shot). -
Solution for Injection, Pre-Filled Syringe>
Common Technical Document Glatiramer acetate 20 mg/mL Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe 1 NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT [Product name]<20 mg/mL><Solution for Injection, Pre-filled Syringe> 2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION 1 ml of solution for injection contains 20 mg glatiramer acetate*, equivalent to 18 mg of glatiramer base per pre-filled syringe. * The average molecular weight of glatiramer acetate is in the range of 5,000-9,000 daltons. Due to its compositional complexity, no specified polypeptide can be fully characterized in terms of amino acid sequence, although the final glatiramer acetate composition is not entirely random. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3 PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Solution for Injection, Pre-filled Syringe [Solution for Injection] Clear, colourless to slightly yellow/brownish solution free from visible particles. The solution for injection has a pH of 5.5 - 7.0 and an osmolarity of about 265 mOsmol/L. 4 CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Glatiramer acetate is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) (see Section 5.1 for important information on the population for which efficacy has been established). Glatiramer acetate is not indicated in primary or secondary progressive MS. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology The recommended dosage in adults is 20 mg of glatiramer acetate (one pre-filled syringe), administered as a subcutaneous injection once daily. At the present time, it is not known for how long the patient should be treated. A decision concerning long term treatment should be made on an individual basis by the treating physician. -
Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Brain (1997), 120, 1085–1096 REVIEW ARTICLE Primary progressive multiple sclerosis A. J. Thompson,1 C. H. Polman,2 D. H. Miller,1 W. I. McDonald,1 B. Brochet,3 M. Filippi,4 X. Montalban5 and J. De Sa´6 1Department of Clinical Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Correspondence to: Alan J. Thompson, The National London, UK, 2Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Hospital, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3Departement de Neurologie, Hoˆpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Bordeaux, France, 4Department of Neurology, Scientific Institute, Ospedale San Raffaele, University of Milan, Italy, 5Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain and 6Servic¸o de Neurologia, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal Summary Patients with multiple sclerosis who develop progressive disability and the role of MRI in monitoring disease activity disability from onset without relapses or remissions pose in this clinical subgroup require elucidation, particularly in difficulties in diagnosis, monitoring of disease activity and view of the lack of change on conventional imaging in the treatment. There is a need to define the diagnostic criteria presence of continuing clinical deterioration. The prognosis for this group more precisely and, in particular, to describe is poor and there are currently no treatment trials for this a comprehensive battery of investigations to exclude other form of the disease. conditions. The mechanisms underlying the development of Keywords: multiple sclerosis; primary progressive; diagnosis Abbreviation: HLA 5 human lymphocyte antigen Introduction Multiple sclerosis is classically characterized by a relapsing/ disease both immunologically and pathologically. Indeed the remitting course due to lesions in many parts of the CNS, question arises as to whether this may be a separate disease with the majority of patients developing progressive disability entity or part of the broad spectrum of multiple sclerosis.