DOCSLIB.ORG

PV PENINSULA WATER RELIABILITY PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PV PENINSULA WATER RELIABILITY PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Public Review Draft PV PENINSULA WATER RELIABILITY PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for November 2017 City of Rolling Hills Estates Public Review Draft PV PENINSULA WATER RELIABILITY PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for November 2017 City of Rolling Hills Estates 4045 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Contact: Jeannie Naughton, AICP 2121 Alton Parkway Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92606 949.753.7001 www.pcrnet.com Irvine Sacramento Los Angeles San Diego Oakland San Francisco Orlando Santa Monica Pasadena Seattle Petaluma Tampa Portland Woodland Hills DPCIB03.EP Table of Contents Page CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST ......................................................................... IS‐1 ATTACHMENT A ‐ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................ A‐1 A. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ A‐1 B. Project Location and Surrounding Uses .................................................................................................................. A‐1 C. Environmental Setting .................................................................................................................................................... A‐1 D. Land Use and Zoning Designations............................................................................................................................ A‐6 E. Description of the Proposed Project ......................................................................................................................... A‐6 F. Construction Approach and Schedule ................................................................................................................... A‐14 G. Necessary Approvals .................................................................................................................................................... A‐17 ATTACHMENT B ‐ EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST DETERMINATIONS ............................................................. B‐1 I. Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................................................................. B‐1 II. Agriculture and forestry Resources .......................................................................................................................... B‐8 III. Air Quality ......................................................................................................................................................................... B‐10 IV. Biological Resources ..................................................................................................................................................... B‐21 V. Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................................................ B‐57 VI. Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................................................................... B‐63 VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................................................................ B‐68 VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .......................................................................................................................... B‐73 IX. Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................................................................... B‐78 X. Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................................................................ B‐82 XI. Mineral Resources ......................................................................................................................................................... B‐84 XII. Noise .................................................................................................................................................................................... B‐85 XIII. Population and Housing ........................................................................................................................................... B‐106 XIV. Public Services ............................................................................................................................................................. B‐107 XV. Recreation ...................................................................................................................................................................... B‐111 XVI. Transportation/Traffic ............................................................................................................................................. B‐112 XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................................ B‐116 XVIII. Utilities and Service Systems ................................................................................................................................. B‐117 XIX. Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................................................................... B‐119 Appendices Appendix A – Air Quality Data Appendix B – Biological Resources Assessment Appendix C – Cultural Resources Assessment City of Rolling Hills Estates PV Peninsula Water Reliability Project ESA i Table of Contents (Continued) Page Appendix D – Preliminary Geotechnical Report Appendix E – Greenhouse Gas Data Appendix F‐1 – Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix F‐2 – Envirostor Database Search Results Appendix G‐1 – Construction Noise Data Appendix G‐2 – Generator Noise Technical Memorandum Appendix H – Native American Consultation Materials Appendix I – Related Projects Data List of Figures Figure Page A‐1 Regional Location and Project Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................ A‐2 A‐2 Proposed Alignment and Surrounding Uses ........................................................................................................ A‐3 A‐3 Existing Water Distribution Facilities ..................................................................................................................... A‐5 A‐4 Proposed Water System Components .................................................................................................................... A‐7 A‐5 Typical Pipeline Segment ............................................................................................................................................. A‐8 A‐6 Pipeline Alignment ‐ Montecillo Drive to Ball Fields ........................................................................................ A‐9 A‐7 Pipeline Alignment ‐ SCBG to Crenshaw Boulevard ....................................................................................... A‐10 A‐8 Pipeline Alignment ‐ Crenshaw Boulevard to Crest Road ............................................................................ A‐11 A‐9 Pump Station Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................ A‐13 B‐1 Simulation 1 ‐ View Southwest from Crenshaw Boulevard ........................................................................... B‐4 B‐2 Simulation 2 ‐ View Northwest from Sunnyridge Road .................................................................................. B‐5 B‐3 Simulation 3 – View North from Southbound Crenshaw Boulevard ......................................................... B‐6 B‐4 USFWS Critical Habitat ................................................................................................................................................ B‐35 B‐5 Impacts to USFWS Critical Habitat ......................................................................................................................... B‐41 B‐6A Impacts to Plant Communities ................................................................................................................................. B‐45 B‐6B Impacts to Plant Communities ................................................................................................................................. B‐46 B‐7A Impacts to Jurisdictional Features ......................................................................................................................... B‐48 B‐7B Impacts to Jurisdictional Features ......................................................................................................................... B‐49 B‐7C Impacts to Jurisdictional Features ......................................................................................................................... B‐50 B‐7D Impacts to Jurisdictional Features ......................................................................................................................... B‐51 B‐8 Noise Measurement Location and Noise Sensitive Receivers .................................................................... B‐93 B‐9 Generator Noise
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nature Walks
    nature walks2017 nd 2 Saturdays january 14, 9 am White Point Nature Education Center & Preserve 1600 W Paseo Del Mar | San Pedro, CA 90731 | Tel: 310.561.0917 vicente bluffs reserve Hours: Wed, Sat & Sun 10 am - 4 pm Follow the bluff top from Family Nature Exploration: Every second Saturday (Free) 10 am Point Vicente to Oceanfront Third Wednesday Bird Walks: (Free-provided by Wild Birds Unlimited) 8:30 am Estates, an area containing Nature Walks with Naturalist: Every fourth Saturday (Free) 9 am restored coastal sage scrub Native Plant Sale: Every fourth Saturday 12 noon - 2 pm habitat. Great location for Workshops & Presentations: Different topic each month - For dates and to RSVP: pvplc.org sighting whales. Easy. RPV february 11, 3 pm George F Canyon Nature Center & Preserve 27305 Palos Verdes Drive East | Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 | Tel: 310.547.0862 sacred cove Hours: Fri 1- 4 pm; Sat & Sun 10 am - 4 pm Situated between First Saturday Family Hikes: Guided hikes through the canyon (Free) 9 am Portuguese Point and Fourth Wednesday Bird Walks: (Free-provided by Wild Birds Unlimited) 8:30 am Inspiration Point, this small Full Moon Hikes: Jan 13, Feb 10, Mar 12, Apr 9, May 7, June 9, July 8, Aug 6, Sep 3, Oct 6, cove features wonderful Nov 7, Dec 2. Must be age 9 and up ($12 person). For times and to RSVP: pvplc.org rock formations edged with tide pools and a channel into a sea cave. Strenuous. RPV june 10, 9 am october 14, 9 am Artists march 11, 2 pm alta vicente reserve lunada canyon white point/royal Explore 15-acre restoration Walk the trail in this quiet Plein air artists will be palms site with cactus wren neighborhood canyon in the painting on the preserves for the indicated walks.
    [Show full text]
  • RECORD PACKET COPY 180Th Day: Sept
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST AREA 245 W. BROADWAY, STE. 380 Filed: March 28, 1996 P.O. BOX 1450 49th Day: HAlVED LONG BEACH, CA 90802·4416 RECORD PACKET COPY 180th Day: Sept. 24, 1996 {310) 590·5071 Staff: JLR-LOB Staff Report: Sept. 9, 1996 Hearing Date: Oct. 8-11 , 1996 STAFF REPQRT AND RECQMMENQATIQN ON APPEAL APPEAL SUBSTANTIAL ISSUE STAFF REPORT LOCAL GOVERNMENT: City of Rancho Palos Verdes LOCAL DECISION: Approval with Conditions APPEAL NO.: AS-RPV-96-061 APPLICANT: Portuguese Bend Beach Club Homeowners Association and City of Rancho Palos Verdes PROJECT LOCATION: 4100 Palos Verdes Drive South (Portuguese Bend Area) City of Rancho Palos Verdes PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Appeal by Lois Larue from decision of City of Rancho Palos Verdes granting permit with conditions to Portuguese Bend Beach Club Homeowners Association to permit continual remedial grading according to a specific 11 tontour grading plan" in order to prevent the toe of the Portuguese Bend Landslide from damaging the adjacent homes and Yacht Harbor Drive. APPELLANT: Lois Larue SUBSTANTIVE FILE DOCUMENTS: 1. City Coastal Permit No. 77 dated March 11, 1996 2. City Council Resolution No. 96-14 dated March 11, 1996 SUMMARY OF STAFF RECQMMENQATION: The staff recommends that the Commission find that the appeal raises tiQ Substantial Issue because the project. as conditionally approved by the City is consistent with Coastal Act policies regarding public access and the City's certified LCP policies regarding natural hazards and sensitive environmental habitat. Page 2 ,., AS-RPV-96-061 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft General Plan Document with Track Changes (PDF)
    DRAFT INTRODUCTION comparison to current General Plan Introduction 4/26/2018 version Note: This document compares the proposed Draft Introduction with the current General Plan Introduction. Changes are shown as follows: bold underline text for new text proposed to be added, strikethrough text for existing text proposed to be removed, and normal text for existing text to remain. 1 Palos Verdes Peninsula The City of Rancho Palos Verdes s located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula in the southwest tip of Los Angeles County. The City includes 12.3 square miles of land and 7-1/2 miles of coastline. One-third of the total land is vacant, with more than three-fourths of the immediate coastline land vacant. The Peninsula has a unique physiography, formed over millions of years of submerging and lifting from the Pacific Ocean. The residents of the Palos Verdes Peninsula are the beneficiaries of a unique geography, formed from millions of years of volcanic activity, plate tectonics and terracing from changing sea levels. The nine-mile wide Peninsula, once an island, the Peninsula, none miles wide by four miles deep, now rises above the Los Angeles Basin with a highest elevation at to a maximum of 1,480 feet, with uniquely terraced configurations and steep, rocky cliffs jutting upward 50 to 300 feet from the ocean. The forming of the Peninsula has resulted in the unique terrace configurations readily observable today and the steep, rocky cliffs at the ocean’s edge which rise from fifty to three hundred feet. Erosion has created contributed to the creation of numerous steep-walled canyons.
    [Show full text]
  • Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy
    Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy January -- December 2010 PALOS VERDES NATURE PRESERVE REPORT FOR THE RANCHO PALOS VERDES PO Box 3427 Palos Verdes Peninsula, NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN California 90274 T 310-541-7613 F 310-541-7623 www.pvplc.org May 2011 Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy 2010 PVNP Report for the Rancho Palos Verdes NCCP TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Site Description ................................................................................................................................ 2 Management Plan .............................................................................................................................. 5 HABITAT RESTORATION AND MONITORING ............................................................................ 5 Habitat Restoration ......................................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Management Plan ....................................................................................................... 6 Additional Restoration .......................................................................................................... 11 Habitat Monitoring .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • O-11 Ken H. Osborne
    Ken H. Osborne 6675 Avenue Juan Diaz, Riverside, CA, 92509 May 22, 2015 Mr. Dennis Campbell County of San Diego Planning and Development Services 5510 Overland Avenue, Suite 110 San Diego, California 92123 Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, and Specific Plan Amendment for Otay Ranch Village 13/Resort Village Impacts on the Federally Endangered Quino Checkerspot Butterfly. Dear Mr. Campbell Endangered Habitats League has asked that I review the proposed Otay Ranch Village 13/Resort Village project in its various alternative forms as described in the March 2015 draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), in light of any potential impacts that it (they) may have on the resident population of federally endangered Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Quino) on the project site. I am a known biologist with some depth of understanding in the biology, ecology, and conservation of this endangered species (Appendix). To this end, I will begin by providing my overall prognosis of implications for Quino with this project and evidence supporting my prognosis including detailed explanation of mechanisms of impact and illustration of example populations extirpated in the wake of similar developments. Although briefed in my introductory comments, a detailed description of Quino biology and ecology will be provided in the appendix as foundational material. After reviewing the DEIR, I have quickly and easily come to the conclusion that this project is not compatible with Quino conservation. Although I can’t go so far to say that this development would, by itself, cause the global extinction of Quino, it would certainly significantly contribute to that end. Even with Alternative G, it’s apparently minimal development footprint gives me concern.
    [Show full text]
  • ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT March 17, 2021 Page 2
    MARCH 17, 2021 (REPORT NO. 21-11) TABLE OF CONTENTS CITY MANAGER – PAGE 4 • Annual Budget Workshop March 30 • Emergency Preparedness Committee Recruitment • DDT Dumping Letter Update • SB 10 Letter • Reminder: West Basin Water is Life Student Art Contest Submissions Due March 19 • West Basin Launches Free Rain Barrel Contactless Home Delivery Program • PVPLC Invites You to a Virtual Docent Orientation • SBCCOG Presents Home Share South Bay • L.A. County Moves into Red Tier, Allowing Reopening of Grades 7-12, Indoor Dining, Movie Theaters, and Other Sectors with Safety Measures in Place • COVID-19 Vaccine Eligibility Expands to People with High-Risk Underlying Conditions • COVID-19 Community Updates o COVID-19 Cases o Vaccinations • Emergency Preparedness o Tips for Finding Residential Fire Insurance o Monthly Disaster Preparedness Messaging - Courtesy of the RPV Emergency Preparedness Committee o Emergency Preparedness Tips ▪ Earthquake Preparedness • Public Safety o Weekly Crime Report Summaries o Security Camera Grant Program Extended o Tips to Prevent Vehicle Burglaries o Safe Drug Drop-off Locations 1 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT March 17, 2021 Page 2 FINANCE – PAGE 22 • Congratulations, Sovanna! • FAC Meeting • Business License Renewal 2021 PUBLIC WORKS – PAGE 24 • Altamira Canyon Drainage Study Extension • Rattlesnake Trailhead Gate Update • Traffic Signal at Hawthorne Boulevard and Via Rivera Project Update • Maintenance Activities • OSHA 10 Safety Training Course COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT – PAGE 28 • South Bay Cities Council of Governments
    [Show full text]
  • Conservancy Timeline
    PALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY TIMELINE 1988 Bill Ailor founds the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy as a 50 l (c)3 nonprofit corporation. Eleven local residents gathered together as the first Board of Directors of a nonpolitical group dedicated to the preservation of open space on the Palos Verdes Peninsula. 1989 Conservancy begins effort to create a 1,000-acre "Portuguese Bend Nature Preserve," to preserve the 53-acre Shoreline Park, and to dedicate the Lunada Canyon parcel. The first newsletter "Open Spaces" is published. 1990 Conservancy places $12.5 million for PV land preservation in County-wide measure. The measure fails, but brings recognition of PV open space issues. 1991 First Conservancy-presented Guided Nature Walk with over 300 people attended first monthly walk. First Executive Director is hired. 1992 20-acre Lunada Canyon is preserved with a major donation by the E.K. Zuckerman family. L.A County voters approve over $7 million for Peninsula open space preservation through the Conservancy-led L.A. County Measure A. 1993 28.5-acre Chandler Trust property preserved using I992 Measure A funds. First Conservancy-sponsored Children's Walk with over 100 children attending. Conservancy gathers nearly 10,000 signatures favoring CalPAW 94, which included a $4 million allocation for Peninsula open space. Measure did not pass, but put the Peninsula on the map as a critical area for land preservation. 1994 Chandler Trust lands dedicated as Linden H. Chandler Preserve. Conservancy spearheads first survey of community on open space preservation issues of over 600 residents shows over 60% would tax themselves to save land.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Foxpro
    Appendix F Biological Resources Berths 302-306 [APL] Container Terminal Project ADP# 081203-131 December 2011 SCH# 2009071021 This page left intentionally blank Appendix F1 CNNDB Full Report Berths 302-306 [APL] Container Terminal Project ADP# 081203-131 December 2011 SCH# 2009071021 This page left intentionally blank California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database Full Report with Sources for Selected Elements Aphanisma blitoides aphanisma Element Code: PDCHE02010 Status NDDB Element Ranks Other Lists Federal: None Global: G2 CNPS List: 1B.2 State: None State: S1.1 Habitat Associations General: COASTAL BLUFF SCRUB, COASTAL DUNES, COASTAL SCRUB. Micro: ON BLUFFS AND SLOPES NEAR THE OCEAN IN SANDY OR CLAY SOILS. IN STEEP DECLINE ON THE ISLANDS AND THE MAINLAND. 1-305M. Occurrence No. 1 Map Index: 37104 EO Index: 12882 Dates Last Seen Occ Rank: Fair Element: 2001-05-30 Origin: Natural/Native occurrence Site: 2001-05-30 Presence: Presumed Extant Trend: Unknown Record Last Updated: 2009-06-12 Quad Summary: San Pedro (3311863/073A) County Summary: Los Angeles Lat/Long: 33.72714º / -118.34703º Township: 05S UTM: Zone-11 N3732717 E375203 Range: 14W Mapping Precision: SPECIFIC Section: 21 Qtr: XX Symbol Type: POLYGON Meridian: S Area: 52.3 acres Elevation: 150 ft Location: PALOS VERDES PENINSULA; FROM NEAR PORTUGUESE BEND SOUTHWARD TO NEAR ROYAL PALMS BEACH PARK. Location Detail: SCATTERED COLONIES ALONG BLUFFS. MAPPED AS FIVE POLYGONS AT THE CNDDB. Ecological: STEEP TALUSED SLOPE WITH CISTANTHE MARITIMA, LYCIUM CALIFORNICUM, RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA, CALANDRINIA MARITIMA, DUDLEYA VIRENS, OPUNTIA LITTORALIS, O. POROLIFERA, AND MIRABILIS CALIFORNICA. Threat: GOLF COURSE AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, DIRT RD TO BEACH, EXOTIC PLANTS, AND DEWATERING FOR LANDSLIDE CONTROL THREATEN.
    [Show full text]
  • The Butterfly Project at America’S the Palos Verdes Blue Butterfly Was Listed As an Butterflyteaching Zoo Provides a Endangered Species in 1980
    THE PROJECT The Butterfly Project at America’s The Palos Verdes blue butterfly was listed as an ButterflyTeaching Zoo provides a endangered species in 1980. eclosion secondary captive rearing The Palos Verdes blue thrives on two host plants, site for the endangered locoweed and deerweed. This butterfly goes through Palos Verdes blue butterfly. one generation per year, with the adults emerging in The primary site is in San early spring, synchronously with the flowering of its foodplants. In the wild, the adults will live around 10 Pedro on federal land. Both days, during which time they will mate and lay eggs. sites are funded through The The eggs are oviposited mostly on Urban Wildlands Group by the the flowers of the foodplant US Defense Logistics Agency which is the preferred wings larval diet. The larvae (USDLA), and the US Navy hatch within 10 days expanding (USN). and eat for around a month, molting A recent shift in the care and several times. handling of the butterfly at The larvae will then seek out the primary site resulted in a sheltered a quadrupling of the captive space in which population. This provided to pupate. The an opportunity to open a adult males and mating females may be secondary site at America’s distinguished Teaching Zoo. by a difference in wing color, the males’ Students and staff of upper wing surface Moorpark College, including being iridescent blue and the the Exotic Animal Training females’ a darker charcoal gray. and Management Program at The butterfly’s coastal scrub habitat on the Palos America’s Teaching Zoo, joina Verdes Peninsula has been shrinking under pressure distinguished team of partners from urban development.
    [Show full text]
  • Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy, a Partner in the Palos Verdes Blue Butterfly Recovery Program
    Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy, A Partner in the Palos Verdes Blue Butterfly Recovery Program The Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy is dedicated to maintaining open space on the Peninsula for the education and enjoyment of all. When the Palos Verdes blue butterfly was rediscovered on the Peninsula in March 1994, the Conservancy played a significant role in the recovery efforts to bring the butterfly back from near extinction. The Conservancy worked with a coalition of concerned entities including The Defense Energy Support Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Moorpark College, and The Urban Wildlands Group to establish an on-site captive rearing program. Together we worked to nurture this endangered species through open space preservation, habitat restoration, and culturing support. As a partner in the Palos Verdes blue butterfly program, the Conservancy: • Manages a nursery to grow plants for the captive rearing program • Manages and monitors current Palos Verdes blue butterfly habitat at Chandler Preserve in Rolling Hills Estates and the Defense Fuel Supply Point in San Pedro, CA. • Collects local native seed for propagation of nursery stock • Leads in native habitat restoration for the butterfly elsewhere on the Palos Verdes Peninsula • Involves community volunteers to help with nursery operations and habitat restoration • Promotes scientific research supporting the Palos Verdes blue butterfly recovery program Today, we are delighted with the announcement of the release of the butterflies at Friendship Park in San Pedro. With our continued efforts throughout the Peninsula, we are confident that the PV blue butterfly will thrive on the Palos Verdes Peninsula. Students observe Palos Verdes Jana Johnson working with a high A high school student at a potential blue butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Biological Resources: Habitat Assessment
    Appendix C Biological Resources: Habitat Assessment Rancho Palos Verdes Portuguese Bend Habitat Assessment City of Rancho Palos Verdes, California Prepared for: City of Rancho Palos Verdes Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 Prepared by: Rincon Consultants, Inc. 180 N. Ashwood Avenue Ventura, California 93003 Revised January 2011 This report produced on 50% recycled paper with 10% post-consumer content. Rancho Palos Verdes Portuguese Bend Habitat Assessment RANCHO PALOS VERDES PORTUGUESE BEND HABITAT ASSESSMENT CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................ 1 Habitat Types .......................................................................................................................... 5 Wildlife ..................................................................................................................................... 6 SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES ........................................................................................................ 6 Special-Status Species Definitions .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NCCP Response2nd
    City of RPV NCCP/HCP Nelson Public Comment Robert Nelson 6612 Channelview Court Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service eMailed: May 4, 2019 c/o Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Mailed: May 4, 2019 2177 Salk Avenue Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 90008 Attn: Karen Goebel, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Public Comment on: Recirculation of Draft of Rancho Palos Verdes (RPV) Natural Community Conservation Plan / Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) and Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Los Angeles County, California, 90275 The view(s), opinion(s) and content expressed/contained in this email do not necessarily reflect the view(s), opinion(s), official positions or policies of the Rancho Palos Verdes City Council, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes or any of its employees, agents, contractors, Commissions or Committees (the “City”). It should be interpreted solely as the view(s), opinion(s) and/or work product of the individual author and should not be relied upon as the official position, direction or decision of the City. Requested Action: If asked now, my vote would be to do nothing, vote to stop our NCCP/HCP/EA effort. My reasoning: readers should know RPV was founded as a ‘low tax’ city. For our 42,000 residents and 14,000 parcels this million dollar expense will be on top of significant, on- coming multi-millions city expenses for underfunded pensions, new large civic center, stopping the landslide, building a new Ladera Linda facility including maybe buying soccer fields for parking and, very important, whatever new major items come up over project’s 40 - 50 year period.
    [Show full text]