DOCSLIB.ORG

Proyecto Arqueológico El Zotz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proyecto Arqueológico El Zotz PROYECTO ARQUEOLÓGICO EL ZOTZ INFORME FINAL 12va TEMPORADA DE CAMPO Entregado a Dirección General del Patrimonio Cultural y Natural Dr., Thomas Garrison y Licda., Yeny Myshell Gutiérrez Castillo Directores del PAEZ Editado por Yeny Myshell Gutiérrez Castillo Jose Luis Garrido López Thomas G. Garrison Stephen Houston Edwin Román Nueva Guatemala de la Asunción, marzo de 2018 Mascaron encontrado en El Palacio del Grupo El Diablo; dibujo por Danilo Hernández PROYECTO ARQUEOLÓGICO EL ZOTZ Directores Dr. Thomas Garrison y Licda., Yeny Myshell Gutiérrez Castillo Equipo de Investigación Danilo Hernández Rony E. Piedrasanta Kevin Mercy Anna Bishop Whitney Zannete Equipo de Universidad de San Diego California Dr. Albert Lin Dr. Curt Schurger Dr. Quentin Gautier Con la asesoría científica de: Dr. Stephen Houston Dr. Edwin R. Román Con el apoyo Logístico de: Adolfo Díaz William Corleto de La Cruz Anatolio López Con el Apoyo Financiero de: FUNDACIÓN PACUNAM Con el apoyo técnico de: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ITHACA COLLEGE UNIVERSIDAD DE BROWN CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS CONSERVACIONISTAS DE LA USAC –CECON- UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Equipo Técnico Grupo Este Alberto Heredia Felipe Quixchán Muzul Alexander Vásquez Roger Alvarado Federico Alvarado Edgar Servantes Grupo El Diablo Humberto Amador Darwin Darío Alejandro Ic Conservación/Restauración Héctor Cervantes Sitio El Palmar Alejandro Balona Marcelino Balona Donis Alvarado Alberto Rodriguez Reconocimiento Luis Ic Pan Oscar Cac Equipo de Campamento y Cocina Leticia de Jesús García María Coc Caal Humbelino Chávez Cristina Poc Choc Raúl Caal Pan ÍNDICE DE CONTENIDO CAPÍTULO 1. Introducción a la Temporada de Campo 2017 del PAEZ ..................................................................11 CAPÍTULO 2. Excavaciones en el Grupo El Diablo (Operación 19) ...........................................................................15 CAPÍTULO 3. Investigaciones en el sitio El Palmar (Operación 10) .........................................................................31 CAPÍTULO 4. Investigaciones en la Estructura M7-1 (Operación 21) .....................................................................41 CAPÍTULO 5. Conservación de estuco modelado del sitio arqueológico El Zotz ................................................57 CAPÍTULO 6. Análisis de los datos de LIDAR obtenidos en el Biotopo San Miguel La Palotada.................67 CAPÍTULO 7. Empleo de Tecnología Tridimensional en el sitio arqueológico El Zotz .................................. 125 CAPÍTULO 8. Análisis del material cerámico de la Temporada 2017.................................................................... 135 CAPÍTULO 9. Osteología De El Zotz: Entierros de la Temporada de Campo 2017 .......................................... 165 CAPÍTULO 10. Informe del análisis Malacológico de El Zotz ..................................................................................... 171 CAPÍTULO 11. Conclusiones de la Temporada de Campo 2017 del PAEZ .......................................................... 187 BIBLIOGRAFÍA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 193 ÍNDICE DE FÍGURAS Figura 2.1. Mapa de ubicación de túneles excavados en las temporadas 2016 y 2017....................................23 Figura 2.2. Mapa de ubicación de túneles excavados en las temporadas 2016 y 2017....................................23 Figura 2.3. Excavación realizada en el Templo del Sol Nocturno, 2017 .................................................................24 Figura 2.4. Mapa del Grupo El Diablo, señalando las estructuras investidas ........................................................25 Figura 2.5. Fragmentos de estuco modelado con pintura roja .....................................................................................25 Figura 2.6. Fachada Este de la Estructura F8-7 ...................................................................................................................26 Figura 2.7. Fragmentos de estuco asociados al mascarón de la Estructura F8-7 ................................................26 Figura 2.8. Mascarón en la esquina Sureste de la Estructura F8-7 ........................................................................... 27 Figura 2.9. Perfil de Fachada Norte F8-10 y Muro de F8-7 ............................................................................................27 Figura 2.10. Cuerpo de la estructura, en la fachada Sur de F8-10 ............................................................................. 28 Figura 2.11. Planta de Estructura F8-7 (Mascarón) y Fachada Sur de Estructura F8-10 ...............................29 Figura 3.1. Mapa mostrando el sitio arqueológico El Palmar ...................................................................................... 33 Figura 3.2. Mapa de El Palmar con fondo blanco, para mostrar la cantidad de edificaciones ......................34 Figura 3.3. Mapa de El Palmar (año 2016), mostrando la ubicación de las edificaciones principales .....35 Figura 3.4. Mapa mostrando el área ampliada de la ubicación de la Estructura D5-1 .................................... 36 Figura 3.5. Planta del túnel realizado entre 2016 y 2017, dentro de la Estructura D5-1-2da ......................37 Figura 3.6. Perfil Este, de la Estructura D5-1-2da, que muestras las unidades EP10 A-9 y EP 10 A-10 ..38 Figura 3.7. Perfil Sur de la Estructura D5-1, evidenciando la secuencia de pisos ...............................................39 Figura 4.1. Perfil de Túnel EZ-21L-1 .........................................................................................................................................46 Figura 4.2. Perfil de Túnel EZ-21N-1 ........................................................................................................................................46 Figura 4.3. Perfil de Túnel EZ-21O-1.........................................................................................................................................47 Figura 4.4. Perfiles de unidades EZ-21M-1 ............................................................................................................................47 Figura 4.5. Perfiles de unidades EZ-21M-2 ............................................................................................................................48 Figura 4.6. Planta de unidades EZ-21M-3 y 5, perfil de unidad EZ-21M-5 .............................................................48 Figura 4.7. Planta y perfil de unidad EZ-21M-4 ...................................................................................................................49 Figura 4.8. Piso Cortado en el Túnel EZ-21L-1 .....................................................................................................................49 Figura 4.9. Agujero en banca ubicada en el túnel EZ-21L-1 ..........................................................................................50 Figura 4.10. Inicio de la limpieza de saqueo de la unidad EZ-21M-1 ........................................................................50 Figura 4.11. Nótese el corte de piso para entrar a la cámara mortuoria .................................................................51 Figura 4.12. Ingreso a la cámara del entierro 33 ................................................................................................................51 Figura 4.13. Inicio de la Limpieza del saqueo EZ-21M-2 ............................................................................................... 52 Figura 4.14. Inicio de la Limpieza del saqueo EZ-21M-2 ................................................................................................52 Figura 4.15. Inicio de la Unidad EZ-21M-3.............................................................................................................................53 Figura 4.16. Inicio de unidad EZ-21M-5, ampliación al Oeste de la EZ-21M-3 .....................................................53 Figura 4.17. Hallazgo de ofrenda en unidad EZ-21M-5 ...................................................................................................54 Figura 4.18. Final de Unidades EZ-21M-3 Y EZ-21M-5 ....................................................................................................54 Figura 4.19. Final de unidad EZ-21M-4 ...................................................................................................................................55 Figura 4.20. Inicio de ampliación de túnel EZ-21N-1 .......................................................................................................55 Figura 4.21. Escalinata localizada en la unidad EZ-21O-1 de la Sub-estructura M7-1-3ª...............................55 Figura 5.1. Difracción de Rayos X del análisis de cal .........................................................................................................61 Figuras 5.2 y 5.3. Reactivación de fisura, derivado del crecimiento interno de raíz .........................................62 Figura 5.4. Ampliación de área de crecimiento de una raíz ...........................................................................................62 Figura 5.5. Trabajo realizado en la Estructura F8-7 de El Palacio, Grupo El Diablo ..........................................62 Figura 5.6. Áreas de riesgo del mascarón de la fachada
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canuto-Et-Al.-2018.Pdf
    RESEARCH ◥ shows field systems in the low-lying wetlands RESEARCH ARTICLE SUMMARY and terraces in the upland areas. The scale of wetland systems and their association with dense populations suggest centralized planning, ARCHAEOLOGY whereas upland terraces cluster around res- idences, implying local management. Analy- Ancient lowland Maya complexity as sis identified 362 km2 of deliberately modified ◥ agricultural terrain and ON OUR WEBSITE another 952 km2 of un- revealed by airborne laser scanning Read the full article modified uplands for at http://dx.doi. potential swidden use. of northern Guatemala org/10.1126/ Approximately 106 km science.aau0137 of causeways within and .................................................. Marcello A. Canuto*†, Francisco Estrada-Belli*†, Thomas G. Garrison*†, between sites constitute Stephen D. Houston‡, Mary Jane Acuña, Milan Kováč, Damien Marken, evidence of inter- and intracommunity con- Philippe Nondédéo, Luke Auld-Thomas‡, Cyril Castanet, David Chatelain, nectivity. In contrast, sizable defensive features Carlos R. Chiriboga, Tomáš Drápela, Tibor Lieskovský, Alexandre Tokovinine, point to societal disconnection and large-scale Antolín Velasquez, Juan C. Fernández-Díaz, Ramesh Shrestha conflict. 2 CONCLUSION: The 2144 km of lidar data Downloaded from INTRODUCTION: Lowland Maya civilization scholars has provided a unique regional perspec- acquired by the PLI alter interpretations of the flourished from 1000 BCE to 1500 CE in and tive revealing substantial ancient population as ancient Maya at a regional scale. An ancient around the Yucatan Peninsula. Known for its well as complex previously unrecognized land- population in the millions was unevenly distrib- sophistication in writing, art, architecture, as- scape modifications at a grand scale throughout uted across the central lowlands, with varying tronomy, and mathematics, this civilization is the central lowlands in the Yucatan peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terminal Classic Period at Ceibal and in the Maya Lowlands
    THE TERMINAL CLASSIC PERIOD AT CEIBAL AND IN THE MAYA LOWLANDS Takeshi Inomata and Daniela Triadan University of Arizona Ceibal is well known for the pioneering investigations conducted by Harvard University in the 1960s (Sabloff 1975; Smith 1982; Tourtellot 1988; Willey 1990). Since then, Ceibal has been considered to be a key site in the study of the Classic Maya collapse (Sabloff 1973a, 1973b; Sabloff and Willey 1967). The results of this project led scholars to hypothesize the following: 1) Ceibal survived substantially longer than other centers through the period of the Maya collapse; and 2) the new styles of monuments and new types of ceramics resulted from foreign invasions, which contributed to the Maya collapse. In 2005 we decided to revisit this important site to re-examine these questions in the light of recent developments in Maya archaeology and epigraphy. The results of the new research help us to shape a more refined understanding of the political process during the Terminal Classic period. The important points that we would like to emphasize in this paper are: 1) Ceibal did not simply survive through this turbulent period, but it also experienced political disruptions like many other centers; 2) this period of political disruptions was followed by a revival of Ceibal; and 3) our data support the more recent view that there were no foreign invasions; instead the residents of Ceibal were reorganizing and expanding their inter-regional networks of interaction. Ceibal is located on the Pasión River, and a comparison with the nearby Petexbatun centers, including Dos Pilas and Aguateca, is suggestive.
    [Show full text]
  • Central America
    Zone 1: Central America Martin Künne Ethnologisches Museum Berlin The paper consists of two different sections. The first part has a descriptive character and gives a general impression of Central American rock art. The second part collects all detailed information in tables and registers. I. The first section is organized as follows: 1. Profile of the Zone: environments, culture areas and chronologies 2. Known Sites: modes of iconographic representation and geographic context 3. Chronological sequences and stylistic analyses 4. Documentation and Known Sites: national inventories, systematic documentation and most prominent rock art sites 5. Legislation and institutional frameworks 6. Rock art and indigenous groups 7. Active site management 8. Conclusion II. The second section includes: table 1 Archaeological chronologies table 2 Periods, wares, horizons and traditions table 3 Legislation and National Archaeological Commissions table 4 Rock art sites, National Parks and National Monuments table 5 World Heritage Sites table 6 World Heritage Tentative List (2005) table 7 Indigenous territories including rock art sites appendix: Archaeological regions and rock art Recommended literature References Illustrations 1 Profile of the Zone: environments, culture areas and chronologies: Central America, as treated in this report, runs from Guatemala and Belize in the north-west to Panama in the south-east (the northern Bridge of Tehuantepec and the Yucatan peninsula are described by Mr William Breen Murray in Zone 1: Mexico (including Baja California)). The whole region is characterized by common geomorphologic features, constituting three different natural environments. In the Atlantic east predominates extensive lowlands cut by a multitude of branched rivers. They cover a karstic underground formed by unfolded limestone.
    [Show full text]
  • Zachary Nelson
    FAMSI © 2008: Zachary Nelson Satellite Survey of El Zotz, Guatemala Research Year: 2007 Culture: Maya Chronology: Pre-Classic through Terminal Classic Location: Petén, Guatemala Sites: El Zotz, El Diablo, Las Palmitas, El Palmar Table of Contents Abstract Resumen Introduction Objectives Methods and Findings El Zotz Mapping Las Palmitas El Diablo El Palmar Conclusions Acknowledgments List of Figures Sources Cited Zachary Nelson Brigham Young University [email protected] -1- Abstract IKONOS satellite imagery is not a cure-all for effective canopy penetration in Petén, Guatemala. It failed to distinguish between sites and natural features at El Zotz, Guatemala. Various types of data manipulation failed to provide sufficient penetrating power. This suggests that micro-environmental factors may be at work, and a pan- Petén process is still in the future. Ground survey of the El Zotz region included mapping at subsidiary sites. Las Palmitas (North Group) has a pyramid with a standing room complete with ancient and modern graffiti. El Diablo (West Group) was mapped. El Palmar, near a cival or residual lake, is configured in an “E-Group” pattern similar to astronomical features identified at Uaxactún. Resumen Las imágenes de satélite de tipo IKONOS todavía no sirven en todo el Petén para penetrar la selva. En El Zotz, las imágenes no pudieron distinguir entre edificios y selva aun con manipulación digital. Eso quiere decir que éxito puede ser un resultado de factores micro-ambiental y todavía no hemos logrado un sistema que siempre funciona. Mapeo de pie en la región alrededor de El Zotz incluyó elaboración de mapas de sitios pequeños.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Künne Y Matthias Strecker INTRODUCCION De Todas Las Manifestaciones Culturales Que Han Dejado Los Indígenas De México
    Martin Künne y Matthias Strecker INTRODUCCION De todas las manifestaciones culturales que han dejado los indígenas de México y de América Central, los grabados y pinturas rupestres han recibido la menor atención. Aunque las representaciones rupestres pertenecen a los monumentos arqueológicos más visibles, solo raras veces se las incluyó en investigaciones sistemáticas. Desde los primeros informes y noticias de la mitad del siglo XIX se dejó su documentación a menudo a aficionados e investigadores autodidactas. De la misma manera se nota que tampoco la literatura especializada actual toma en cuenta las representaciones rupestres de la región. A pesar de que el recién editado "Handbook of Rock Art Research" (Whitley 2001) comprende cuatro regiones americanas, faltan completamente Mesoamérica y América Central. Por otro lado podemos constatar que muchas documentaciones e informes sobre el arte rupestre centroamericano han sido parciales y hacen difícil una visión del conjunto. Sus enfoques se limitan normalmente a perspectivas descriptivas. Solamente algunas tienen también carácter analítico (A. Stone 1995). Entre los pocos compendios que mencionan representaciones rupestres de México y de América Central están las publicaciones "Rock Art Studies: News of the World I" (Bahn y Fossati 1996) y "Arte Prehistórico de América" (Schobinger 1997). Nuestro libro tiene carácter bibliográfico. Su propósito es ser una guía para la búsqueda de fuentes de información y ofrecer una introducción al estudio sistemático del arte rupestre en el oriente de México y en Centroamérica; ampliando y actualizando la publicación anterior "Rock Art of East Mexico and Central America" (Strecker 1979). Se dirige tanto a especialistas, estudiantes y aficionados como a propietarios o indígenas quienes asuman el rol de "custodios naturales" de sitios con representaciones rupestres.
    [Show full text]
  • Maya Civilization Was Much Vaster Than Known, Thousands of Newly Discovered Structures Reveal
    The Washington Post Speaking of Science Maya civilization was much vaster than known, thousands of newly discovered structures reveal By Cleve R. Wootson Jr. February 3 Archaeologists have spent more than a century traipsing through the Guatemalan jungle, Indiana Jones-style, searching through dense vegetation to learn what they could about the Maya civilization that was one of the dominant societies in Mesoamerica for centuries. But the latest discovery — one archaeologists are calling a “game changer” — didn't even require a can of bug spray. Scientists using high-tech, airplane-based lidar mapping tools have discovered tens of thousands of structures constructed by the Maya: defense works, houses, buildings, industrial-size agricultural fields, even new pyramids. The findings, announced Thursday, are already reshaping long-held views about the size and scope of the Maya civilization. “This world, which was lost to this jungle, is all of a sudden revealed in the data,” said Albert Yu-Min Lin, an engineer and National Geographic explorer who worked on a television special about the new find. “And what you thought was this massively understood, studied civilization is all of a sudden brand new again,” he told the New York Times Thomas Garrison, an archaeologist at Ithaca College who led the project, called it monumental: “This is a game changer,” he told NPR. It changes “the base level at which we do Maya archaeology.” The findings were announced by Guatemala's Fundación Patrimonio Cultural y Natural Maya (Mayan Heritage and Nature Foundation), also known as PACUNAM, which has been working with the lidar system alongside a group of European and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Reading Proposal for the Water Scroll Sign T579 As YAM
    Glyph Dwellers Report 63 November 2019 A New Reading Proposal for the Water Scroll Sign T579 as YAM Jens Rohark Cancún, Mexico The hieroglyph listed as T579 (Fig. 1a) in the Thompson (1962) catalog and ZUP in the catalog of Macri and Looper ( 2003), is only seldom attested in Maya hieroglyphic writing. Basically, it occurs in only few secure contexts: 1) as part of the emblem glyph of Altun Ha and its place name (Fig. 1b-d); 2) as part of the emblem glyph of Topoxte (Fig. 1.f), 3) in context of a female nominal phrase with the logogram EK' (Fig. 1g), 4) designating the name of a mountain, SAK-T579-wi-WITZ, (Fig. 1h), and 5) as part of the nominal phrase of a wahy being formerly known as "water-jaguar" (Fig. 1i). There are also some examples of T579 in fragmentary inscriptions, where the contexts are, however, not clear (Fig. 1j, k). So far, the most comprehensive study about the glyph T579, which is also known as the 'Water Scroll' Sign, has been published by Helmke, Guenter, and Wanyerka (2018). Their excellent article focuses on the appearances of the Water Scroll emblem glyph, which is associated with the Altun Ha royal family, and, as they argue, stresses the importance of Altun Ha despite of the seemingly small size of that site. The authors briefly mention the possible phonetic reading of the glyph as follows: "... in the absence of a fuller understanding of the semantics of this sign, we are not yet closer to proposing a decipherment. Yet, the iconography does, however, make it clear that the sign marks bodies of water, perhaps specifically freshwater, and may, in fact, represent a wave" (Helmke, Guenter and Wanyerka 2018: 115).
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations at Holmul, Petén, Guatemala Preliminary Results of the Third Season, 2002
    FAMSI © 2003: Francisco Estrada-Belli Archaeological Investigations at Holmul, Petén, Guatemala Preliminary Results of the Third Season, 2002 With contributions by Britta Watters, John Tomasic (Vanderbilt U.) Katie South (S. Illinois U.), Chris Hewitson (English Heritage), Marc Wolf (T.A.M.S.), Kristen Gardella (U. Penn.), Justin Ebersole, James Doyle, David Bell, Andie Gehlhausen (Vanderbilt U.), Kristen Klein (Florida State U.), Collin Watters (Western Illinois, U.), Claudio Lozano Guerra-Librero (Anphorae), Jena DeJuilio, Shoshuanna Parks (Boston U.), Raul Archila, Luis Salazar, Mynor Silvestre, Mario Penados, Angel Chavez, Enrique Monterroso (USAC, CUDEP). Research Year: 2002 Culture: Maya Chronology: Late Pre-Classic to Classic Location: Petén, Guatemala Sites: Holmul, Cival, Hahakab and La Sufricaya Table of Contents Introduction Methodology Synopsis of the 2002 season results Discovery of Hahakab Other Explorations in the Holmul area Mapping at Holmul Excavations within Holmul site center Group 13 Group III, Court A Group III, Court B South Group 1 Salvage excavations at K’o Investigations at La Sufricaya Summary of excavations in Str. 1 Imaging of the La Sufricaya Murals 1-3 Conservation of Murals Summary of excavations in Stelae 4, 5, 6, 8 Residential buildings at La Sufricaya Investigations at Cival Conclusions and future research directions Acknowledgements List of Figures Sources Cited Appendix A. Ceramics Appendix B. Drawings Appendix C. Epigraphy Introduction The present report summarizes the results of the 2002 field season of the Holmul Archaeological Project at Holmul, Petén and at the sites of Cival, Hahakab and La Sufricaya in its vicinity (Figure 1). This field season was made possible thanks to funding from the National Geographic Society, Vanderbilt University, the Ahau Foundation, FAMSI, Interco, as well as permits extended by IDAEH of Guatemala.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Classic Maya Political Structure, Polity Size, and Warfare Arenas
    LATE CLASSIC MAYA POLITICAL STRUCTURE, POLITY SIZE, AND WARFARE ARENAS Arlen F. CHASE and Diane Z. CHASE Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Central Florida Studies of the ancient Maya have moved forward at an exceedingly rapid rate. New sites have been discovered and long-term excavations in a series of sites and regions have provided a substantial data base for interpreting ancient Maya civili- zation. New hieroglyphic texts have been found and greater numbers of texts can be read. These data have amplified our understanding of the relationships among subsistence systems, economy, and settlement to such an extent that ancient Maya social and political organization can no longer be viewed as a simple dichoto- mous priest-peasant (elite-commoner) model. Likewise, monumental Maya archi- tecture is no longer viewed as being indicative of an unoccupied ceremonial center, but rather is seen as the locus of substantial economic and political activity. In spite of these advances, substantial discussion still exists concerning the size of Maya polities, whether these polities were centralized or uncentralized, and over the kinds of secular interactions that existed among them. This is espe- cially evident in studies of aggression among Maya political units. The Maya are no longer considered a peaceful people; however, among some modern Maya scholars, the idea still exists that the Maya did not practice real war, that there was little destruction associated with military activity, and that there were no spoils of economic consequence. Instead, the Maya elite are portrayed as engaging predo- minantly in raids or ritual battles (Freidel 1986; Schele and Mathews 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation for Maya Cultural and Natural Heritage
    Our mission is to coordinate efforts Foundation for Maya Cultural and provide resources to identify, and Natural Heritage lead, and promote projects that protect and maintain the cultural Fundación Patrimonio Cultural y Natural Maya and natural heritage of Guatemala. 2 # nombre de sección “What is in play is immense” HSH Prince Albert II of Monaco he Maya Biosphere Reserve is located in the heart of the Selva Maya, the Maya Jungle. It is an ecological treasure that covers one fifth of Guatemala’s landmass (21,602 Tsquare kilometers). Much of the area remains intact. It was established to preserve—for present and future generations— one of the most spectacular areas of natural and cultural heritage in the world. The Maya Biosphere Reserve is Guatemala’s last stronghold for large-bodied, wide-ranging endangered species, including the jaguar, puma, tapir, and black howler monkey. It also holds the highest concentration of Maya ruins. Clockwise from bottomleft José Pivaral (President of Pacunam), Prince Albert II of Monaco (sponsor), Mel Gibson (sponsor), Richard Hansen (Director of Mirador The year 2012 marks the emblematic change of an era in the ancient calendar of the Maya. This Archaeological Project) at El Mirador momentous event has sparked global interest in environmental and cultural issues in Guatemala. After decades of hard work by archaeologists, environmentalists, biologists, epigraphers, and other scientists dedicated to understanding the ancient Maya civilization, the eyes of the whole Pacunam Overview and Objectives 2 world are now focused on our country. Maya Biosphere Reserve 4 This provides us with an unprecedented opportunity to share with the world our pressing cause: Why is it important? the Maya Biosphere Reserve is in great danger.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Precision Radiocarbon Dating of Political Collapse and Dynastic Origins at the Maya Site of Ceibal, Guatemala
    High-precision radiocarbon dating of political collapse and dynastic origins at the Maya site of Ceibal, Guatemala Takeshi Inomata (猪俣 健)a,1, Daniela Triadana, Jessica MacLellana, Melissa Burhama, Kazuo Aoyama (青山 和夫)b, Juan Manuel Palomoa, Hitoshi Yonenobu (米延 仁志)c, Flory Pinzónd, and Hiroo Nasu (那須 浩郎)e aSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030; bFaculty of Humanities, Ibaraki University, Mito, 310-8512, Japan; cGraduate School of Education, Naruto University of Education, Naruto, 772-8502, Japan; dCeibal-Petexbatun Archaeological Project, Guatemala City, 01005, Guatemala; and eSchool of Advanced Sciences, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, 240-0193, Japan Edited by Jeremy A. Sabloff, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, and approved December 19, 2016 (received for review October 30, 2016) The lowland Maya site of Ceibal, Guatemala, had a long history of resolution chronology may reveal a sequence of rapid transformations occupation, spanning from the Middle Preclassic period through that are comprised within what appears to be a slow, gradual transi- the Terminal Classic (1000 BC to AD 950). The Ceibal-Petexbatun tion. Such a detailed understanding can provide critical insights into Archaeological Project has been conducting archaeological inves- the nature of the social changes. Our intensive archaeological inves- tigations at this site since 2005 and has obtained 154 radiocarbon tigations at the center of Ceibal, Guatemala, have produced 154 ra- dates, which represent the largest collection of radiocarbon assays diocarbon dates, which represent the largest set of radiocarbon assays from a single Maya site. The Bayesian analysis of these dates, ever collected at a Maya site.
    [Show full text]
  • Aproximación a La Conservación Arqueológica En Guatemala: La Historia De Un Dilema
    86. AP RO X IMACIÓN A LA CON S ERVACIÓN a r qu e o l ó g i c a e n gU a t e m a l a : LA HI S TORIA DE U N DILEMA Erick M. Ponciano XXVIII SIMPO S IO DE IN V E S TIGACIONE S AR QUEOLÓGICA S EN GUATEMALA MU S EO NACIONAL DE AR QUEOLOGÍA Y ETNOLOGÍA 14 AL 18 DE JULIO DE 2014 EDITOR E S Bá r B a r a ar r o y o LUI S MÉNDEZ SALINA S LO R ENA PAIZ REFE R ENCIA : Ponciano, Erick M. 2015 Aproximación a la conservación arqueológica en Guatemala: la historia de un dilema. En XXVIII Simpo- sio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, 2014 (editado por B. Arroyo, L. Méndez Salinas y L. Paiz), pp. 1053-1064. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala. APROXIM A CIÓN A L A CONSERV A CIÓN A RQUEOLÓGIC A EN GU A TEM A L A : L A HISTORI A DE UN DILEM A Erick M. Ponciano PALABRAS CLAVE Guatemala, recursos culturales, conservación, época prehispánica. ABSTRACT Guatemala has many archaeological sites from pre-colombian times. This characteristic creates a paradoji- cal and complex situation to Guatemala as a society. On one side, there exists a feeling of proud when sites like Tikal, Mirador or Yaxha are mentioned, but on the other side, also exits uncertainty on private lands due to the fear for expropriation from the State when archaeological sites occur in their terrain. Different forms for cultural preservation are presented and how this has developed through time in Guatemala.
    [Show full text]