D-branes and Closed String Field Theory
N. Ishibashi (University of Tsukuba)
In collaboration with Y. Baba(Tsukuba) and K. Murakami(KEK)
JHEP 05(2006):029 JHEP 05(2007):020 JHEP 10(2007):008
理研シンポジウム「弦の場の理論07」 Oct. 7, 2007 1 §1 Introduction
D-branes in string field theory
• D-branes can be realized as soliton solutions in open string field theory
• D-branes in closed string field theory?
Hashimoto and Hata
HIKKO
♦A BRS invariant source term ♦tension of the brane cannot be fixed 2 Tensions of D-branes
=
Can one fix the normalization of the boundary states without using open strings?
For noncritical strings, the answer is yes. Fukuma and Yahikozawa
Let us describe their construction using SFT 3 for noncritical strings. c=0 noncritical strings
+ + double scaling limit
String Field l
Describing the matrix model in terms of this field, we obtain the string field theory for c=0 noncritical strings Kawai, N.I. 4 Stochastic quantization of the matrix model
Jevicki and Rodrigues
joining-splitting interactions 5 correlation functions
Virasoro constraints FKN, DVV
Virasoro constraints Schwinger-Dyson equations for the correlation functions
~ various vacua
6 Solitonic operators Fukuma and Yahikozawa Hanada, Hayakawa, Kawai, Kuroki, Matsuo, Tada and N.I.
These coefficients are chosen so that
From one solution to the Virasoro constraint, one can generate another by the solitonic operator. 7 These solitonic operators correspond to D-branes
amplitudes with ZZ-branes
state with D(-1)-brane = ghost D-brane 8 Okuda,Takayanagi critical strings?
noncritical case is simple
idempotency equation Kishimoto, Matsuo, Watanabe
For boundary states, things may not be so complicated 9 If we have ・SFT with length variable ・nonlinear equation like the Virasoro constraint for critical strings, similar construction will be possible.
We will show that ・ for OSp invariant SFT for the critical bosonic strings ・ we can construct BRS invariant observables using the boundary states for D-branes imitating the construction of the solitonic operators for the noncritical string case.
♦the BRS invariant observables →BRS invariant source terms~D-branes ♦the tensions of the branes are fixed
10 Plan of the talk
§2 OSp Invariant String Field Theory
§3 Observables and Correlation Functions
§4 D-brane States
§5 Disk Amplitudes
§6 Conclusion and Discussion
11 §2 OSp Invariant String Field Theory
light-cone gauge SFT
O(25,1) symmetry
OSp invariant SFT =light-cone SFT with Grassmann Siegel, Uehara, Neveu, West, Zwiebach, Kugo, Kawano,…. OSp(27,1|2) symmetry
12 variables
13 action
14 15 OSp theory 〜 covariant string theory with extra time and length
HIKKO
・no ・extra variables
16 The “action” cannot be considered as the usual action
looks like the action for stochastic quantization
BRS symmetry
the string field Hamiltonian is BRS exact 17 18 OSp invariant SFT 〜stochastic formulation of string theory ?
Green’s functions of BRS invariant observables ∥
Green’s functions in 26D ▪Wick rotation
▪1 particle pole
S-matrix elements in 26D ∥ ? S-matrix elements derived from the light-cone gauge SFT
19 §3 Observables and Correlation Functions
observables
ignoring the multi-string contribution
if
we need the cohomology of 20 cohomology of
(on-shell)
This state corresponds to a particle with mass 21 Observables
22 Free propagator
two point function
We would like to show that the lowest order contribution to this two point function coincides with the free propagator of the particle corresponding to this state.
23 light-cone quantization
24 25 the Hamiltonian is BRS exact a representative of the class
26 N point functions
we would like to look for the singularity
light-cone diagram
27 the singularity comes from
28 Repeating this for we get
29 Rem. higher order corrections
・two point function
・N point function
can also be treated in the same way at least formally 30 Wick rotation
・LHS is an analytic function of
・Wick rotation + OSp(27,1|2) trans.
・
reproduces the light-cone gauge result 31 §3 D-brane States Let us construct off-shell BRS invariant states, imitating the construction of the solitonic operator in the noncritical case.
Boundary states in OSp theory
boundary state for a flat Dp-brane
32 BRS invariant regularization
states with one soliton
will be fixed by requiring
33 creation
34 shorthand notation
35 Using these, we obtain
We need the idempotency equation.
36 Idempotency equations
leading order in
corrections 37 Derivation of the idempotency equations
38 39 ・ : quadratic in can be evaluated from the Neumann function
・ can also be evaluated from the Neumann function
・
40 we can fix the normalization in the limit
can be evaluated in the same way
41 Using these relations we obtain
if
Later we will show 42 States with N solitons
Imposing the BRS invariance, we obtain
looks like the matrix model 43 can be identified with the open string tachyon
may be identified with the eigenvalues of the matrix valued tachyon
open string tachyon
44 More generally we obtain
・we can also construct
45 §4 Disk Amplitudes
BRS invariant source term
Let us calculate amplitudes in the presence of
such a source term. 46 saddle point approximation
generate boundaries on the worldsheet
47 correlation functions
= ++…
+ +…
Let us calculate the disk amplitude 48 Rem.
In our first paper, we calculated the vacuum amplitude
▪we implicitly introduced two D-branes by taking the bra and ket
→ states with even number of D-branes
but ▪vacuum amplitude is problematic in light-cone type formulations
▪we overlooked a factor of 2 49 disk two point function
50 tachyon-tachyon
coincides with the disk amplitude up to normalization
・more general disk amplitudes can be calculated in the same way
51 low-energy effective action
Comparing this with the action for D-branes
52 §5 Conclusion and Discussion
♦D-brane BRS invariant source term
♦other amplitudes
♦similar construction for superstrings
we need to construct OSp SFT for superstrings
♦more fundamental formulation?
53