February 2002 FASEB Federal Funding Consensus Conference Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

February 2002 FASEB Federal Funding Consensus Conference Executive Summary A Publication of The American Physiological Society Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism THE Volume 45, Number 1 Physiologist February 2002 FASEB Federal Funding Consensus Conference Executive Summary Our investment in scientific research proposals. search program. This effort should has contributed substantially to our FASEB advocates a return to the com- include an increase in the number of health and quality of life. We have made mitment to double the NSF budget and meritorious proposals funded, the addi- tremendous progress in the battle recommends that the NSF budget for FY tion of a second annual review cycle, against disease and now enjoy longer, 2003 be increased by at least 15 percent, expansion of the ground-based research healthier lives. With the power of the new to $5.5 billion. program to support the OBPR flight pro- discoveries in genetics, we stand on the United States Department gram and to prepare for utilization of the threshold of even more profound under- of Agriculture (USDA) International Space Station and expan- standing of basic biological processes FASEB supports increasing funding sion of outreach activities to enlist, train which will, in turn, dramatically enhance for the National Research Initiative and retain outstanding investigators. our abilities to prevent, treat and cure Competitive Grants Program to at least FASEB recommends an annual disease. $200 million. This amount would be a sig- increase of $100 million for OBPR s bio- The past year has also seen the rise of nificant step toward bringing the pro- logical research programs to be used to new threats to our security. Protection gram closer to its authorized level of $500 enhance investigator-initiated, peer- against bioterrorism has become a major million. reviewed life sciences research opportu- national priority. Due to our previous FASEB recommends that funding for nities. investments in research, the scientific the National Needs Fellowship Grants be (continued on page 3) community was able to immediately con- increased to $5 million and the Higher tribute to the nation s response to this Education Challenge Grants increased to new threat. Much more remains to be $6 million. done, and we stand ready to do our part. FASEB supports development of mech- Inside this issue... Scientific research must be an essential anisms that would enable the Initiative component in our plans to meet the chal- for Future Agriculture and Food Systems APS Council Holds Fall Meeting lenges of the 21st century. to become a stable source of research in Virginia In this report, the Federation of funds. p. 5 American Societies for Experimental Department of Energy (DOE) Biology (FASEB), on behalf of its 21 FASEB recommends a budget of $3,668 Blaustein Receives ACDP member societies representing more than million for DOE s Office of Science in FY Distinguished Service Award 60,000 scientists, offers its view of imme- 2003 for work that addresses important diate research opportunities for scientific national needs in basic energy sciences p. 7 and medical advancement and provides and to augment important core pro- fiscal year 2003 funding recommenda- grams, enhance utilization of major Ohio Physiological Society tions for the biomedical and life sciences research facilities, develop the next gen- Annual Meeting Report portfolios of seven federal agencies. eration of scientific tools and strengthen p. 8 National Institutes of Health (NIH) research and education at US universi- FASEB recommends an appropriation ties. NIH Issues New Graduate Student of $27.3 billion for NIH in FY 2003. This FASEB supports the establishment of Compensation Policy will achieve the goal of doubling the NIH the position of Under Secretary of p. 17 budget within five years. Science and Energy Research. National Science Foundation (NSF) National Aeronautics and Space FASEB supports a major increase in Administration (NASA) Experimental Biology the average size and duration of NSF FASEB recommends that the Office of 2002 Program grants. Biological and Physical Research (OBPR) p. 20 FASEB supports funding more of the give the highest priority to expanding its most meritorious yet currently unfunded investigator-initiated, peer-reviewed re- 1 Published bimonthly and distributed by THE The American Physiological Society 9650 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20814-3991 PhysiologistVolume 45 Number 1 ISSN 0031-9376 February 2002 John E. Hall President Gerald F.DiBona Past President Contents Barbara A. Horwitz President-Elect Martin Frank FASEB Federal Funding 107th Congress Tackles Editor and Executive Director Consensus Conference Domestic Terrorism 18 Councillors Executive Summary 1 Senate Abandons Farm Relief Kim E. Barrett, Hannah V.Carey, Effort; Puppy Protection Douglas C. Eaton, Joseph R. Haywood, Creating a Better Mousetrap! Amendment Waits in Wings 18 Steven C. Hebert, Jo Rae Wright A Matter of Opinion 3 Experimental Biology 2002 Ex Officio APS News Distinguished Lectureships 20 Dale J. Benos, Mordecai P.Blaustein, APS Council Holds Fall Meeting 5 Schedule of Sessions 22 Robert G. Carroll, APS and International Outreach 6 Poster Sessions 27 Curt Sigmund, Celia D. Sladek Blaustein Receives ACDP Sections Special Functions 29 Distinguished Service Award 7 Committee Meetings 30 Publications Committee: Chairman:Dale Publications Special Functions 31 J. Benos; Members: David H.Alpers, Hershel Chapter News Raff, Richard A. Murphy, James A. Schafer. Ohio Physiological Society Positions Available 32 Director of Publications:Margaret Reich. Annual Meeting Report 8 Design and Copy Editor:Joelle R. News From Senior Grossnickle. Membership Physiologists 38 Subscriptions: Distributed to members as New Regular Members 9 part of their membership. Nonmembers in the USA: individuals $50.00; institutions New Student Members 10 Book Reviews 41 $75.00. Nonmembers in Canada and New Affiliate Members 11 Mexico: individuals $55.00; institutions Books Received 42 $80.00. Nonmembers elsewhere: individu- Publications als $60.00; institutions $85.00.Single copies APS s Legacy to Science 12 People & Places and back issues when available, $15.00 Fellows Steps Down, Campbell each; single copies and back issues of APS Web News Named Interim Head of Abstracts issues when available, $25.00. Subscribers to The Physiologist also receive The Popularity of the APS Physiology, Biophysics 43 abstracts of the Conferences of the Website Continues to Grow 12 American Physiological Society. Announcements The American Physiological Society Education New APS Membership Benefit: assumes no responsibility for the state- APS Undergraduate Fellow Free Access to All APS Online ments and opinions advanced by contribu- Receives Rhodes Scholarship 13 Journals 45 tors to The Physiologist. Lake Cumberland Biological Deadline for submission of material for Public Affairs Transport Group Meeting 45 publication: Jan. 10, February issue; March Rats, Mice and Birds Rule 10, April issue; May 10, June issue; July 10, Delayed Further 14 Scientific Meetings August issue; Sept. 10, October issue; Nov. Activists Funding Remains and Congresses 46 10, December issue. Strong; PCRM, PETA Hide Please notify the central office as soon as Fundraising Costs 15 APS Membership possible if you change your address or telephone number. Congress Finalizes 2002 Budgets 16 Application 47 AAHRPP Forming Human Headquarters phone: 301-530-7164 Accreditation Site Visit Teams 17 APS Conference Program 49 Fax: 301-571-8305 Email: [email protected] NIH Issues New Graduate Physiological Genomics of http://www.the-aps.org Student Compensation Policy 17 Cardiovascular Disease: Printed in the USA From Technology to Physiology 2 The Physiologist Executive Summary Vol. 45, No. 1, 2002 (continued from page 1) Environmental Protection Agency the EPA to perform. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (EPA) FASEB recommends that funding FASEB recommends that $404 mil- FASEB encourages the EPAs Office for the Science to Achieve Results lion be appropriated in FY 2003 for VA of Research and Development to attract (STAR) program be increased by $25 biomedical research, $33.5 million (a and retain talented scientists through million. nine-percent increase) over FY 2002. an expanded pre-doctoral, post-doctor- FASEB recommends that funding This should be the beginning of a sus- al and faculty exchange program. for the EPAs Office of Research and tained, multi-year investment. FASEB urges Congress to provide Development budget be increased to new funds for projects that it directs $664 million for FY 2003. ❖ A Matter of Opinion Creating a Better Mousetrap! On January 11th, HighWire Press, publishers that the content should be the development of the HighWire the producer of APS online journal given away. As a result of the discon- Public Library of the Sciences and sites, announced the launch of a new nect between the desires of PLoS and Medicine. The new site offers users and better mousetrap for the scientific the financial realities of publishing seamless, full-text access to nearly 300 community. Named the HighWire scientific journals online, very few highly cited journals, plus simultane- Library of the Sciences and Medicine publishers took PubMed Central up on ous, searchable access to all of [from http://highwire.stanford.edu, their offer. To date, only five estab- Medline. In addition, the portal pro- click on the link to try the beta ver- lished journals have content posted on vides access to the world s largest sion ], the site is designed to address PubMed
Recommended publications
  • Capital Credit Unclaimed ADAMS HENRY AIKEN WAYNE
    Capital Credit Unclaimed ADAMS HENRY AIKEN WAYNE A J WALKER CONST CO ADAMS HOWARD L AIKMAN RUTH ABBOTT BENNIE O ADAMS JACK AIRCALL COMM INC ABBOTT DONALD E ADAMS JESSIE AIRHART FRANK D ABBOTT DONNA ADAMS JOHN F AIRPORT STEAKHOUSE ABBOTT E H ADAMS KEN AKERS EVERETT L ABBOTT GLADYS ADAMS KENNETH R AKERS MARY E ABBOTT GUS ADAMS LARRY K AKERS PETE ABBOTT J H ADAMS LEMMA L AKERS R H ABBOTT PAUL ADAMS ROBERT E AKERS ROBERT JR ABBOTT TED ADAMS ROBERT S AKERS RUBY ABBOTT VETA ADAMS RONALD AKERS STEPHEN G ABBY DEBBIE ADAMS THOMAS W AKERS THORNTO J R ABEGGLEN JAMES S ADAMS VERONICA AKIN PAULINE ABEL DOROTHY ADAMS ZOLA AKINS & HOOD PARTNERS ABELL D F ADCOCK KENNETH L ALBERT DAVID ABELL WILLIAM E ADCOCK M C ALBERT STEVEN E ABERNATHY LAUREL ADDAE MAX ALDERSON ROBERT W ABSHER GREG C ADDIS DEAN ALDRIDGE LEO J ABSTON ARTHUR ADEN HARM H ALESHIRE DELPHIA ACKERET EDWARD A ADKINS C G ALESHIRE DORIS ACKERMAN ALVIN H ADKINS GARY L ALESHIRE EDNA ACS GARDEN CENTER ADKINS HELEN J ALESHIRE OWEN C ADAIR MADONNA F ADKINS JOE L ALESHIRE RALPH ADAIR RANDALL E ADKINS MARK ALEXANDER ALICE S ADAIR SARA ADKINS NORMAN ALEXANDER BARRY ADAMS CHARLES J ADKINS WILLIAM M ALEXANDER CARSON T ADAMS DARRELL L ADRIAN ROY ALEXANDER DENNIS ADAMS DORIS M ADRIAN WILLIAM ALEXANDER HAROLD ADAMS F M AGERS CLARE A ALEXANDER HELEN B ADAMS H L AGERS IDA ALEXANDER JOHN R ADAMS HARRY AGNEW JAMES C ALEXANDER R C ADAMS HARRY J AGRICO CHEMICAL CO ALEY BILL E AHRENDTS DONALD ALFACORN CORP ALFORD HASTON ALLING TIM ANDERSON DEBORAH ALHASSAN MICHAEL ALLISON CHARLES W ANDERSON DENNIS ALI MOHAMMEY ALLISON
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategy of Radical Environmentalism
    Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, Summer 2008, Vol. 10, Issue 4. THROWING A WRENCH INTO THINGS: THE STRATEGY OF RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM Teale Phelps Bondaroff, University of Calgary Introduction: The current focus on Islamic terrorism has resulted in a lack of awareness of other forms of terrorism. Similarly, the focus on external non-conventional threats to security has meant that domestic threats are being overlooked. One such instance is that of the threat posed by radical environmentalist organizations, such as Earth First! (EF!)1, the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), and the Sea Shepherds Society. These organizations, which premise themselves upon the assertion of “No compromise in the Defense of Mother Earth!” have declared themselves Mother Nature’s armies and navies and represent the militarization of the environmental movement.2 The operations in which they engage, of which there have been more than 600 in the United States and Canada since 1996, have been responsible for an estimated $100 million in damages.3 Though the impact of these operations pale in comparison to those of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon in 2001, they represent a growing trend in environmental organizations, and a growing non-conventional societal threat. The threat is especially real in Canada where many groups find their origins in Canadian-born organizations such as Greenpeace. 1 The name of the ‘Earth First!’ includes the exclamation mark, which places emphasis on their commitment to action. 2 Jonathan I. Lange, “Refusal to Compromise: The Case of Earth First!” Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54 (Fall 1990), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles on Animal and Earth Liberation Struggles from “Green Anarchist
    Articles on Animal and Earth Liberation Struggles from “Green Anarchist Various Authors 2003 Contents Words of Liberation from inside the Complex. An Interview With U.S. animal liberation ex-prisoner Petey Schnell 3 War & Peace. Iraq and the continuing war against life by Jim Jones 10 I Find You Guilty. New Statement from Rob ‘Los Ricos’ Thaxton 12 Josh Harper Statement on Home Raid 14 Beyond the E.L.F. Craig Rosebraugh on creating a new direct action movement against capitalism and industrialization. 16 Evolution of the Offensive. Final statement of Leslie James Pickering as spokesperson for the north american earth liberation front press office 19 Solidarity Means Attack 26 The Inseparable Earth and Animal Liberation Movement by Craig ‘Critter’ Marshall 28 The Elf and the Spectacle by ASAN 32 Perpetuating the Spectacle by Craig Marshall 35 2 Words of Liberation from inside the Complex. An Interview With U.S. animal liberation ex-prisoner Petey Schnell How did you get involved in the animal rights movement? Well, after choosing vegetarianism, my earth and animal consciousness seemed to be ever growing, while becoming interested in looking into animal agriculture and the horrors behind such an industry was growing as well. After discovering and then bringing myself from a vegetarian lifestyle to a vegan one, I knew that a lifestyle change only was not enough. Along with others, I organized to try and get the high school that I attended to choose more humane, alternative ways of studying the anatomy of a cat rather than dissecting the dead animal in this biology class.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoterrorism: Environmental and Animal-Rights Militants in the United States
    UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 07 May 2008 UNIVERSAL ADVERSARY DYNAMIC THREAT ASSESSMENT Ecoterrorism: Environmental and Animal-Rights Militants in the United States EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The term ecological terrorists,1 or ecoterrorists, refers to those individuals who independently and/or in concert with others engage in acts of violence and employ tactics commonly associated with terrorism to further their sociopolitical agenda aimed at animal and/or environmental protection. The ecoterrorist movement is a highly decentralized transnational network bound and driven by common ideological constructs that provide philosophical and moral justification for acts of violence against what it perceives to be the destructive encroachment of modern society on the planet’s habitat and its living organisms.2 The ecoterrorist movement represents the fringe element of the broader ecological and animal- rights community that argues that the traditional methods of conserving and preserving the Earth are insufficient, and is willing to use violence as the principal method of the planet’s defense against anyone “guilty” of exploiting and destroying the Earth. (U//FOUO) The overall strength of the movement is impossible to determine given that individuals who take part in ecoterrorist activities generally lack a common profile and exercise a high level of operational security. Nonetheless, ecoterrorists are known to have a global presence and are particularly active in the industrialized West (North America and Western Europe). In the continental United States (CONUS), militant ecological and animal-rights activists are geographically dispersed and operate in both urban and rural settings. The movement has demonstrated a great deal of tactical and strategic sophistication.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes from Briana Waters Trial Day 2
    Notes from Briana Waters Trial Day 2 U.S. District Court of Western Washington (Tacoma) Judge Burgess presiding (scribe’s note: All remarks are paraphrased, not verbatim as spoken. Because of the sheer volume of information and the desire to make it public as soon as possible, punctuation and grammar protocol may be ignored outright.) Some abbreviations will be used throughout this text. The scribe does not guarantee correct spellings or transcriptions of names and other proper nouns. DEF: Defense The defendant, Briana waters is represented by attorneys Neal Fox and Robert Bloom US: Prosecution The plaintiff in this case is the United States government, represented by federal prosecutors Andrew Friedman and Mark Barlett. Mr. Bartlett, in my observation, did not present remarks, evidence or make motions, so US in this text refers to words and actions of Mr. Friedman. Sitting with the prosecuting attorneys was also FBI agent Ted Halla. The proceedings began before the jury was brought in. US: Yesterday we heard for the first time that Mr. Fox anticipates going into the area that the FBI might have changed or tailored witness testimony if the agents were concerned about the OPR Office of Professional Responsibility or a civil lawsuit. The defense needs to be aware that if this issue is raised, it is the government’s strong position that this would open up the door to airing in court what agents knew - especially Agent Halla – which overwhelmingly leads to guilt, but may not be admissible. For instance, Chelsea Gerlach says that she and the defendant cooperated on writing a communiqué, and that Briana obtained a car for one of the Oregon actions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earth Liberation Front and Environmental Terrorism
    THE EARTH LIBERATION FRONT AND ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM Stefan H. Leader* Peter Probst Introduction In the wake of September 11, 2001, Americans can be forgiven for thinking that terrorist threats come from abroad and have a distinctly Islamic character. In fact, homegrown terrorists of all kinds continue to flourish in the US. Case in point: The Earth Liberation Front (ELF). ELF has become the most active and the most destructive environmental terrorist group in the United States. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Earth Liberation Front, together with its sister organization, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), in the past 6 years has committed more than 600 criminal acts that have resulted in more than $43 million in damages.1 Moreover, attacks have been perpetrated in virtually every region of the US against a wide variety of targets. Origins The Earth Liberation Front was established in 1992 in Brighton, England and dedicated to saving the environment. It was founded by the more radical members of the activist environmental group,” Earth First!” who believed criminal acts would better advance their environmentalist agenda than would legal protest. The American branch announced its creation in October 1996 with an arson attack on a US Forest Service truck in Oregon’s Willamette National Forest. The decoupling of ELF from Earth First enabled the two organizations to focus on their respective constituencies. Earth First recruits those who believe in peaceful, non-violent protest. The ELF, in contrast, draws those who favor direct action and revolutionary violence. The goals of the two groups are similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Earth Liberation Front
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE RHETORIC OF ECO-REVOLUTIONARY ACTIVISM: CONSTRUCTING THE EARTH LIBERATION FRONT Jade Olson, Doctor of Philosophy, 2017 Directed by: Professor James F. Klumpp and Professor Shawn J. Parry-Giles Department of Communication In the mid-1990s, a new voice of environmental protest emerged in the United States. Frustrated by the failures of both mainstream and radical environmental activism to protect the Earth from the catastrophic effects of industrial capitalism, a small group of clandestine activists identifying as the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) utilized vandalism, arson, and other means of property destruction to articulate a rhetoric of revolutionary environmental resistance. An unlikely coalition of voices from industry, government, and the established environmental movement emerged to oppose ELF, painting the activists as dangerous eco-terrorists. This study examines the dialectical contest to provide the dominant public account of ELF’s enigmatic protest rhetoric. This rhetoric is referred to in the study as eco-revolutionary activism, for it rejected even the radical discourses of its ideological predecessors such as Earth First!, embracing instead a holistic critique of capitalism, the state, and contemporary civilization. The study traces the dialectic that unfolded through a series of key moments in the rise and fall of ELF in the public imaginary. ELF made national headlines in 1998 when affiliated activists set fire to seven buildings at a Colorado ski resort as a protest against the resort’s planned expansion into ecologically fragile habitat. In the years that followed, ELF activists went on to commit more than 100 protest actions, causing millions of dollars in economic damage and prompting foundational questions about the meaning of violence, the limits of protest, and the responsibility of individuals to combat harmful systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism 2000 2001 Fbi Publication #0308 TerrRism 2000/2001
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation TERRORISM 2000 2001 FBI PUBLICATION #0308 TERRRISM 2000/2001 FORWARD EXPANDING FOCUS As the events of September 11, 2001, demonstrated with brutal clarity, the terror- ist threats facing the United States are formidable. Between 1991 and 2001, 74 terrorist incidents were recorded in the United States. During this same time frame, an additional 62 terrorist acts being plotted in the United States were pre- vented by U.S. law enforcement. As troubling as these statistics are, they only hint at the full scope of the terrorist threat confronting U.S. interests. For every successful terrorist attack mounted in the United States, nearly 20 (19.83) anti- U.S. attacks are carried out around the world. Between 1996 and 2001, these overseas attacks killed 75 Americans and wounded an additional 606. During the past two decades, the U.S. Government has expanded the FBI’s authority to investigate terrorist activities against U.S. interests overseas. Specifically, the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorist Act of 1986, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, and Presidential Decision Directive 39 have served to extend FBI investigative authority beyond U.S. borders when U.S. interests are harmed or TERRORISM threatened. Since 1984 the FBI has carried out over 300 extraterritorial investigations, in close cooperation with the U.S. Department of State and with the assistance of host 2000 governments. These investigations include some of the FBI’s /2001 most complex and high-profile cases, including investigations into the September 11 attacks, as well as the bombings of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996, two U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Management Guide
    Crisis Management Guide 2013 Edition Prepare. Prevent. Protect. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH 8181100 Connecticut Vermont Avenue Avenue NW, NW, Suite Suite 1100 900 Washington, DC 2000520006 Telephone: 202-857-0540, Fax: 202-659-1902 Internet: www.nabr.org E-mail: [email protected] 2 Crisis Management Guide Prepare. Prevent. Protect. TABLE of CONTENTS Introduction Animal Activists Pose a Real Threat to Biomedical Research..........................................................................7 Be Prepared – This Guide is a Roadmap to Readiness......................................................................................9 Seize the Opportunity – Take the Lead Now....................................................................................................10 Assess Section One: Assess..............................................................................................................................................13 Step One: Assemble a Crisis Management Team...........................................................................................13 Step Two: Organize the Team...........................................................................................................................13 Step Three: Mobilize the Team...........................................................................................................................13 Management/Administration.......................................................................................................14 Human Resources................................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Terrorism Specifically Examining the Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front
    S. HRG. 109–947 ECO-TERRORISM SPECIFICALLY EXAMINING THE EARTH LIBERATION FRONT AND THE ANIMAL LIBERATION FRONT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 18, 2005 Printed for the use of the Committee on Environment and Public Works ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress.senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 32–209 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma, Chairman JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia JAMES M. JEFFORDS, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri MAX BAUCUS, Montana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut LINCOLN CHAFEE, Rhode Island BARBARA BOXER, California LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware JOHN THUNE, South Dakota HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York JIM DEMINT, South Carolina FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia BARACK OBAMA, Illinois DAVID VITTER, Louisiana ANDREW WHEELER, Majority Staff Director KEN CONNOLLY, Minority Staff Director (II) CONTENTS Page MAY 18, 2005 OPENING STATEMENTS Inhofe, Hon. James M., U.S. Senator from the State of Oklahoma .................... 1 Jeffords, Hon. James M., U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont .................... 3 Lautenberg, Hon. Frank, U.S. Senator from the State of New Jersey ............... 5 Obama, Hon. Barack, U.S. Senator from the State of Illinois, prepared state- ment .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Journal
    Journal of History Utah Valley University 2015 UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY Journal of History Volume XII 2015 Crescat Scientia is an annual publication of Utah Valley University’s Department of History and Political Science. Issues are available for distribution during the spring semester of each academic year. To obtain subscription information or back copies of Crescat Scientia, please contact the history department: Utah Valley University Department of History and Political Science 800 West University Parkway CB 203A Orem, Utah 84058 Phone: (801) 863-8487 Fax: (801) 863-7013 ©2015 Utah Valley University, Department of History and Political Science. All rights revert to the authors upon publication. We invite all current students to submit thier manuscripts for review and possible publication. Works submitted must be thematically relat- ed to history and political science. To submit a manuscript, deliver a complete version of the manuscript with cover sheet to the UVU His- tory Department Office (CB 203A). Submissions should be written in accordance with the notes and bibliography documentation style form teh Chicago style of citation. Submissions should be written in accordance with teh notes and bibliography documentation style from teh Chicago style of citation.Submissions must be between five (5) and twenty-five (25) pages in length.The manuscript should also be provided in digital form via email or be dropped off to our main office. Please note that any desired alterations should be made prior to submission. Editors will check for spelling errors and layout prob- lems, not for substantial revision opportunities. All papers are chosen through a double blind selection process by student editors.
    [Show full text]