DOCSLIB.ORG

Armenian Civil Society After Twenty Years of Transition: Still Post-Communist?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Armenian Civil Society After Twenty Years of Transition: Still Post-Communist? Armenian Civil Society after Twenty Years of Transition: Still Post-Communist? Yevgenya Jenny Paturyan Valentina Gevorgyan Yerevan 2014 Armenian Civil Society after Twenty Years of Transition: Still Post-Communist? Authors: Yevgenya Jenny Paturyan Valentina Gevorgyan Contributing team: Tatevik Badalyan Bella Baghdasaryan Anna Drnoyan Arman Gasparyan Angela Hassassian Nelly Minasyan Book cover: designed by authors using www.tagxedo.com Turpanjian Center for Policy Analysis American University of Armenia 2014 The present study was conducted with the support of the Academic Swiss Caucasus Net (ASCN). ASCN is a programme aimed at promoting the social sciences and humanities in the South Caucasus (primarily Georgia and Armenia). Its different activities foster the emergence of a new generation of talented scholars. Promising junior researchers receive support through research projects, capacity-building training and scholarships. The programme emphasizes the advancement of individuals who, thanks to their ASCN experience, become better integrated in international academic networks. The ASCN programme is coordinated and operated by the Interfaculty Institute for Central and Eastern Europe (IICEE) at the University of Fribourg (Switzerland). It was initiated and is supported by Gebert Rüf Stiftung. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent opinions of Gebert Rüf Stiftung and the University of Fribourg. Acknowledgements The production of this manuscript was supported by the Academic Swiss Caucasus Net (ASCN) research grant. We are very grateful to ASCN for providing us with an opportunity to conduct this study and for the exceptionally conducive working relations and additional support activities, such as methodology workshops, conferences, professional advice and so on. During the two years of implementation, the study has benefited greatly from the suggestions and feedback provided by Dr. Simone Baglioni, who served as an academic mentor to this project. We are thankful for his inquisitiveness, continued support, professional advice and encouragement, which have guided us through the study. Our special thanks go to the American University of Armenia and particularly to the Political Science and International Affairs (PSIA) graduate program, which has created a treasured environment for academic work. We are grateful to Dr. Douglas H. Shumavon. Many aspects of this research have been designed under his leadership in his capacity as the PSIA chair and Turpanjian Center for Policy Analysis director. We are also thankful to our colleagues, the PSIA faculty members for being ready to provide feedback on aspects of research whenever needed. The production of this book would not have been possible without an enormous support from the contributing team members, named above, who have been especially involved in the initial stages of the project, from numerous brainstorming sessions to data collection and analysis. We are also very grateful to people who have been involved in the implementation of this study from its inception to the very end, including PSIA work and study students, volunteers, visiting researchers and lecturers. Their contributions have been invaluable in the development of this study. While they are too many to name individually, we would particularly like to mention Armine Bagiyan, Amalya Fljyan and Mariella Falkenhain. We would like to acknowledge the contributions of the study participants, willing to share their time and insights, particularly those NGOs from the regions, who hosted our team, as their cooperative attitude made the study possible and valuable to the reader. Thanks to all the Armenian NGOs who were cooperative in providing a response to our questionnaire. Responsibility for all mistakes and omissions in the book remains authors’ alone. We are grateful to www.tagxedo.com for the free word cloud software used in the design of the cover page. Last but not least, our gratitude goes to our families and a few close friends, whose encouragement and interest in our work makes it an even more enjoyable journey of discovery. November, 2014 2 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 6 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter I: Theoretical Framework .............................................................................................................. 11 1.1. Defining Civil Society ............................................................................................................................ 12 1.2. Relevance of Civil Society ..................................................................................................................... 13 1.3. Communism and Post-Communism .................................................................................................... 15 1.4. Narrowing Down the Concept of Civil Society ..................................................................................... 17 1.4.1. Focus on NGOs as Typical Representatives of Civil Society Organisations ............................... 18 1.4.2. Focus on Individual Attitudes and Behaviours: Trust, Membership and Volunteering ............ 20 1.5. Generational Change and Young People ............................................................................................. 23 Chapter II: Armenian Civil Society ............................................................................................................... 25 2.1. Soviet Armenian Civil Society ............................................................................................................... 25 2.2. Post-Soviet Development: Rise of NGOs ............................................................................................. 26 2.3. Current Overall Assessment of Armenian Civil Society ....................................................................... 27 2.4. Specific Challenges of Civil Society ...................................................................................................... 29 2.4.1 Communist Legacy: Mistrust and Disengagement .................................................................... 29 2.4.2. Institutional Constraints: International Donors’ Impact on Civil Society .................................. 30 2.5. Number of NGOs Existing in Armenia: An Open Question .................................................................. 31 Chapter III: Methodology of the Study ....................................................................................................... 35 3.1. Three Levels of Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 35 3.2. Methods Used in the Analysis of Armenian Civil Society .................................................................... 35 3.2.1. Secondary Data Analysis ........................................................................................................... 36 3.2.2. The Organisational Survey ........................................................................................................ 38 3.2.3. Semi-structured Interviews with NGO Leaders and Volunteers ............................................... 42 Chapter IV: Secondary Data Analysis .......................................................................................................... 44 4.1. Membership in SCOs: Post-communist “Weakness” Then and Now .................................................. 44 4.1.1. World Values Survey, 1995-1998 .............................................................................................. 44 4.1.2. World Values Survey 2010-2014: Current State of Associational Membership ....................... 47 4.1.3. Comparing the Third and Sixth World Values Survey Waves ................................................... 50 3 4.2. Trust towards NGOs and Volunteering in Armenia and the South Caucasus ...................................... 51 4.2.1. Trust towards NGOs .................................................................................................................. 53 4.2.2. Volunteering ............................................................................................................................. 57 4.3. Narrowing the Focus to Armenia ......................................................................................................... 58 4.3.1. Membership in Associations ..................................................................................................... 58 4.3.2. Trust towards Civil Society and NGOs ....................................................................................... 61 4.3.3. Volunteering ............................................................................................................................. 65 4.3.4. The Generational Change in Armenia. ...................................................................................... 68 Chapter
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59 Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP for OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE's J
    UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59th Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP FOR OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE’S JOINT SUBMISSION TO THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE ON THE FOURTH PERIODIC REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OF PUNISHMENT October 17, 2016, Yerevan, Armenia Hereby, the Partnership for Open Society Initiative,1 representing more than 60 civil society organizations, presents a joint submission prepared by the following civil society organizations, public monitoring groups, human rights lawyers and attorneys: 1. Coalition to Stop Violence Against Women; 2. Center for Rights Development NGO; 3. Committee to Protect Freedom of Expression; 4. Foundation Against the Violation of Law NGO; 5. Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly–Vanadzor; 6. Helsinki Committee of Armenia Human Rights Defender NGO; 7. Journalists' Club Asparez; 8. Open Society Foundations – Armenia; 9. Protection of Rights without Borders NGO; 10. Rule of Law Human Rights NGO; 11. Group of Public Monitors Implementing Supervision over the Criminal-Executive Institutions and Bodies of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Armenia; 12. Public Monitoring Group at the Detention Facilities of the Police of the Republic of Armenia; 13. Davit Khachaturyan, Justice Group, Open Society-Foundations-Armenia, Expert, Ph.D; 14. Inessa Petrosyan, Attorney; 15. Tigran Hayrapetyan, Attorney; 16. Tigran Safaryan, Attorney; 17. Vahe Grigoryan, Attorney, Legal Consultant at EHRAC (Middlesex University). Contacts Persons David Amiryan Karine Ghazaryan Open Society Foundations-Armenia Open Society Foundations-Armenia Deputy Director for Programs Civil Society Program Coordinator E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 1 http://www.partnership.am/en/index 1 Contents INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia, Republic of | Grove
    Grove Art Online Armenia, Republic of [Hayasdan; Hayq; anc. Pers. Armina] Lucy Der Manuelian, Armen Zarian, Vrej Nersessian, Nonna S. Stepanyan, Murray L. Eiland and Dickran Kouymjian https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T004089 Published online: 2003 updated bibliography, 26 May 2010 Country in the southern part of the Transcaucasian region; its capital is Erevan. Present-day Armenia is bounded by Georgia to the north, Iran to the south-east, Azerbaijan to the east and Turkey to the west. From 1920 to 1991 Armenia was a Soviet Socialist Republic within the USSR, but historically its land encompassed a much greater area including parts of all present-day bordering countries (see fig.). At its greatest extent it occupied the plateau covering most of what is now central and eastern Turkey (c. 300,000 sq. km) bounded on the north by the Pontic Range and on the south by the Taurus and Kurdistan mountains. During the 11th century another Armenian state was formed to the west of Historic Armenia on the Cilician plain in south-east Asia Minor, bounded by the Taurus Mountains on the west and the Amanus (Nur) Mountains on the east. Its strategic location between East and West made Historic or Greater Armenia an important country to control, and for centuries it was a battlefield in the struggle for power between surrounding empires. Periods of domination and division have alternated with centuries of independence, during which the country was divided into one or more kingdoms. Page 1 of 47 PRINTED FROM Oxford Art Online. © Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treaty of Sevres As the Legal Basis for the Western Armenia’S Territorial Claims to Turkey ***
    Правова система України й міжнародне право, порівняльне правознавство DOI : 10.36695/2219-5521.2.2019.38 УДК 341.01 O.M. POlivAnOvA , A.A. AbrAAMiAn Olena Mykolayivna Polivanova , Ph .D. in Law, Asso - ciate professor of Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine * ORCID : 0000-0002-5670-8900 Anna Aramivna Abraamian , master student of Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine ** THE TREATY OF SEVRES AS THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE WESTERN ARMENIA’S TERRITORIAL CLAIMS TO TURKEY *** Problem statement . History of the Armenian statehood has more than a few thousands of years and it may even be regarded as the oldest in the history of human civilization 1. Armenian statehood took different forms: from Azzi-Hayasa confederation (1500 – 1290 BC) to the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, also known as the Cilician Armenia, Lesser Armenia, or New Armenia 2 (1198–1375). Sources vary on when Armenian statehood was lost. Some scientists suggest that its loss may be dated to 1375 when the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia was ceased to exist 3. Others state it was lost in 1045 with the fall of Bagratid Armenia, because Cilician Armenia was outside of the traditional Armenian homeland, while Bagratid Armenia was the last major Armenian state in the Armenian Highlands 4. Nevertheless, since the loss of Armenian statehood at that time, the First Armenian Republic (the Armenian National Council declared the independence of Armenia on 28 May 1918), officially known at the time of its existence as the Democratic Republic of Armenia, was the first mod - ern Armenian state.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 20820-AM Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 8.6 MILLION (US$ 11. 4 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FOR A JUDICIAL REFORM PROJECT August 21, 2000 Legal Department Public Disclosure Authorized Europe and Central Asia Region CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective August 21, 2000) Currency Unit = Dram Dram 1.0 = US$ 0.002 US$ 1.00 = 547 Drams FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 ABBREVIATIONSAND ACRONYMS ABA- CEELI American Bar Association's Central and Eastern European Law Institute CAS Country Assistance Strategy CCC Council of Court Chairmen EU-TACIS European Union - Technical Assistance Program for the Commonwealth of the Independent States ECU European Currency Unit FMS Financial Management System FSU Former Soviet Union IDA International Development Association JTC Judicial Training Center GOA Government of Armenia. GTZ Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit MOJ Ministry of Justice PAC Project Administration Council PIU Project Implementation Unit PMR Project Management Report POM Project Operational Manual SA Special Account SATAC I Structural Adjustment Technical Assistance Credit SATAC II Second Structural Adjustment Technical Assistance Credit SDR Special Drawing Rights SOE Statements of Expenditures USAID United States Agency for International Development WTO World Trade Organization YSU Yerevan State University Vice President: Johannes F. Linn Country Director: Judy O'Connor Sector Manager: Friedrich Peloschek Task Team Leader: Irina L. Kichigina ARMENIA JUDICIAL REFORM PROJECT CONTENTS A. ProjectDevelopment Objective Page 1. Project developmentobjective 2 2. Key performance indicators 2 B. Strategic Context 1. Sector-related Country Assistance Strategy (CAS) goal supported by the project 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services and Their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - a Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine
    UNDP/UNEP “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services” Technical Assistance Project The report is prepared for United Nations Development Programme in Armenia within the frame of the project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia”. The project is funded under umbrella of United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) joint global Poverty and Environment Initiative (PEI) and aims to contribute to poverty reduction and improved well-being of poor and vulnerable groups through mainstreaming the environment into national development processes Ecosystem Services and their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - A Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine Final Report February 2014 This report has been developed in the scope of UNDP/UNEP join joint TA Project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia” Implementing agency UNDP UNDP EG Portfolio Analyst Armen Marirosyan UNDP Programme Policy Adviser, EG portfolio, Project Georgi Arzumanyan coordinator UNDP Project Assistant Kristina Tereshchatova Project team: Project international consultant Camille Bann Project task leader Anastas Aghazaryan Project experts Davit Androyan Vram Tevosyan Lothar Guendling Georgi Fayvush Hrant Avetisyan Armen Amiryan Aida Tarloyan Armen Ghazaryan Arman Kandaryan Mikayel Avagyan Address: 14 Petros Adamyan str., 0010 Yerevan, Armenia UNDP Armenia Tel: (374 60) 530000; Fax: (+374 10) 543811 Web Site: http://www.am.undp.org E-mail: [email protected] 2 List of abbreviations EIE Environmental Impact Expertise
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN UNIVERSITY of ARMENIA College of Humanities
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA College of Humanities and Social Sciences Teaching English through Social Issues and Digital Storytelling A design project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Teaching English as a Foreign Language By Zhenya Yesayan Irshat Madyarov, Adviser Yerevan, Armenia 2016 2 We hereby approve that this design project By Zhenya Yesayan Entitled Social Issues through Digital Storytelling and Video Production Be accepted in partial fulfillment for the requirements of the degree Master of Arts in Teaching English as a Foreign Language ………..………………………… Dr. Irshat Madyarov, Adviser ………..………………………… Dr. Irshat Madyarov MA TEFL Program Chair Yerevan, Armenia 2016 3 Acknowledgements I want to express my gratitude to the MA TEFL faculty for their hard work and for the devotion to their work. My gratitude is great to the American University of Armenia for providing me the unique learning experience, which is incredible and vital. Special thanks to all instructors of the MA TEFL program for providing me with such amazing and useful learning experiences, for the theoretical and practical knowledge they gave us. I wish to express my greatest gratitude to Dr. Irshat Madyarov for his encouragement and support, for his thoughtful guidance and helpful suggestions. It was my pleasure working with him and growing professionally under his supervision. A special thank-you is reserved for my dear friend and classmate Tatevik Vardanyan who did not hesitate to offer a hand and support me whenever I needed a helping hand. I want to thank her for her friendship, reliable support and encouragement throughout these two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    JINISHIAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT 2005 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction …………………………………………………………………..... 3 2.0 Operations and Administration Activities ……………………………………. 3 3.0 Finance Department Activities ……………………………………….....…….. 4 4.0 Program Department Activities …………………………….……………..….. 5 4.1 Activities Related to Core Strategies ……………………………….………….….…... 5 4.1.1 Diversification of Funding Sources (Core Strategy I)….…………………………..….... 5 Continued Relief to Vulnerable Groups (Core Strategy II) and Increased Emphasis on 4.1.2 Development Programming (Core Strategy III)………………………………………… 5 4.1.3 Results Based Management (Core Strategy IV)………………………..…….…....….... 6 4.2 Activities Related to Strategic Objectives…………………………….…... 6 4.2.1 Organizational Restructure and Staffing………………………………………...………. 6 4.2.2 Organizational and Staff Capacity …………………………………………………….. 7 4.2.3 Funding Level for Development Programs …………………………………………….. 7 4.2.4 Community Based Development Projects …………………………………………… 7 4.2.5 Incorporate Results Based Approach to Project Cycles ………………………………. 7 4.2.6 More Proactive Program Methods………………………………………………………. 7 4.2.7 Increase Project Cost Effectiveness …………………………………………………… 8 4.2.8 Institutionalize JMF Lending Services ……………………………………………….. 8 4.2.9 Expand JMF Activities to Other Armenian Communities in the Caucasus ………….. 8 4.3 Program Areas…………………………………………………….……..….…. 8 4.3.1 Development Program Highlights…………………………………………….…...…… 8 4.3.2 Relief Program Highlights……………………………..………………………..……… 16 Annex I Consolidated Profit and Loss Statement and Balance Sheet Annex II Summary of JMF’s Projects in 2005 2 Jinishian Memorial Foundation 2005 Annual Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following report is developed on the bases of the JMF Strategic Plan (SP) and year 2005 Action Plan (AP), which serve as a guiding and underlying documents for organization’s activities and main operations. All the operations and achievements are tuned to the priorities, strategies and objectives indicated in the SP and are revised and presented correspondingly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia
    Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. GE JR Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. 12-181 Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Structure of Volume of Final Report Vol. Title Language Armenian I Summary English Japanese Armenian Main Report 1 II English Risk Assessment of Yerevan City Japanese Armenian Main Report 2 III English Yerevan Earthquake Disaster Management Plan Japanese Armenian IV Data Book English Exchange rate used in this report 1.00 US Dollar (US$) = 407.43 Armenia Drams (AMD) 1.00 Japanese Yen (JPY) = 5.19 Armenia Drams (AMD) (as of October 8, 2012) Outline of the Project Outline of the Project 1. Background Title: The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Counterpart Agency: Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) Project Period: August 2010 - December 2012 The goal of this project is “Reduction of Disasters due to a large scale earthquake which has a possibility of occurrence in Yerevan City”.
    [Show full text]
  • Belongings: People and Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations 1945
    Belongings: People and Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations 1945-49 LAYCOCK, Joanne <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-3303> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/16292/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version LAYCOCK, Joanne (2017). Belongings: People and Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations 1945-49. Kritika : Exploration in Russian and Eurasian History, 18 (3), 511-537. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Belongings: People and Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations 1945 - 1949 Jo Laycock Introduction On July 9th 1947 the Pobeda docked in Batumi carrying 2509 items of hand baggage and 2548 items of hold baggage. It was followed a few weeks later by the Chukotka, which carried another 2700 items of hand baggage and a further 3408 items of hold baggage.1 The owners of this cargo were diaspora Armenians from communities in Greece and the Middle East who had responded to a Soviet invitation to repatriate to their ‘homeland’, Soviet Armenia. By the time the scheme came to an abrupt end in 1949 almost 90,000 Armenians had gathered up their belongings and embarked on similar voyages toward the Republic. 2 The arrival of the Pobeda and the Chukotka in the USSR occurred against a backdrop of post-war population movement on a vast scale as prisoners of war, evacuees, forced laborers, conscript soldiers and many others sought ways and means to go home.3 Yet the Armenian repatriations were distinct from this context of movement in important ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey - Armenia Travel Grant & Fellowship Scheme HRANT DINK FOUNDATION
    Turkey - Armenia Travel Grant & Fellowship Scheme HRANT DINK FOUNDATION Hrant Dink Foundation was established after the assasination of Hrant Dink in front of his newspaper Agos on January 19, 2007, in order to avoid similar pains and to continue Hrant Dink’s legacy, his language and heart and his dream of a world that is more free and just. Democracy and human rights for everyone regardless of their ethnic, religious or cultural origin or gender is the Foundation’s main principle. The Foundation works for a Turkey and a world where freedom of expression is limitless and all differences are allowed, lived, appreciated, multiplied and conscience outweighs the way we look at today and the past. As the Hrant Dink Foundation ‘our cause worth living’ is a future where a culture of dialogue, peace and empathy prevails. BEYOND BORDERS TURKEY-ARMENIA TRAVEL GRANT & FELLOWSHIP SCHEME 2014-2015 www.armtr-beyondborders.org Turkey-Armenia Travel Grant & Fellowship Scheme are financed by the European Union within the framework of the programme Support to the Armenia-Turkey Normalisation Process. ISBN: 978-605-66011-8-7 PROJECT TEAM Anna Yeghoyan Anush Babajanyan Murat Gözoğlu Müge Yamanyılmaz Zeynep Sungur EDiToR Altuğ Yılmaz TRANSLATION Alin Ozinyan Ceylan Gürman Şahinkaya 2 PROOFREADING Burcu Becermen GRAPHIC DESIGN Sera Dink GRAPHICS APPLICATION Erge Yeksan PRINTING APA UniPrint bASiM SAn. vE tiC. A.Ş. Hadımköy Mahallesi, 434 Sokak, no:6 34555 Arnavutköy / istanbul t: +90 212 798 28 40 This publication has been produced with © Hrant Dink Foundation Publications the financial assistance of the European Union within the framework of the Anarad Hığutyun binası programme Support to the Armenia-Turkey Papa roncalli Sok.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Non Government Organizations' Shadow
    ARMENIA NON GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS’ SHADOW REPORT TO CEDAW ON THE 5TH AND 6TH PERIODIC REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATE PARTIES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN Submitted by the CEDAW Task Force Armenia which includes group of NGOs: Democracy Today NGO Disability Info NGO Sinjar Yezidi National Union Center for Gender and Leadership Studies Coalition to Stop Violence Against Women with support from the Advocates for Human Rights, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status with ECOSOC. The members of the Coalition are the following NGOs: Women's Support Center NGO Women's Rights Center NGO Women's Resource Center NGO Sexual Assault Crisis Center NGO Real World, Real People NGO Public Information and Need of Knowledge NGO Society Without Violence NGO Yerevan 2016 1 Table of Contents ARMENIA NON GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS’ SHADOW REPORT TO CEDAW ................................... 1 ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Article 1. Discrimination ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Article 2. Policy Measures ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interna Onal Organiza on for Migra On
    Internaonal Organizaon for Migraon International Organization for Ministry of Justice of the European Union Migration Republic of Armenia ANALYSIS OF ARMENIAN MIGRATION LEGISLATION AND PRACTICE AS COMPARED TO EU STANDARDS International Organization for Migration (IOM) 2013 1 UDC 341.215.43 The Analysis of Armenian Migration Legislation and Practice as Compared to EU Standards was conducted within the framework of the Project “Strengthening Evidence-Based Management of Labour Migration in Armenia” funded by the European Union and the IOM Development Fund. Expert Team: Mária Temesvári, Christina Vasala Kokkinaki Prepared for publication by IOM Project Development and Implementation Unit in Armenia. While IOM endeavours to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content of this Review, the views, findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of IOM and its Member States.IOM does not accept any liability for any loss, which may arise from the reliance on information contained in this paper. © Copyright: All rights reserved.No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means of electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior without the prior written permission of the publisher. Publisher: ISBN 978-9939-50-247-2 2 Contents FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]