DOCSLIB.ORG

Newborn Screening: Toward a Uniform Screening Panel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Newborn Screening: Toward a Uniform Screening Panel NNEWBORN SSCREENING:: TTOWARD A UUNIFORM SSCREENING PPANEL AND SSYSTEM 1 Newborn Screening Steering Committee Jose Cordero, MD, MPH Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear, MD, PhD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Health Resources and Services Administration E. Steven Edwards, MD Marie Y. Mann, MD, MPH (Project Officer) Past President Maternal and Child Health Bureau American Academy of Pediatrics Health Resources and Services Administration R. Rodney Howell, MD Tricia Mullaley American College of Medical Genetics Genetic Alliance University of Miami School of Medicine Peter van Dyck, MD, MPH Jennifer L. Howse, PhD Maternal and Child Health Bureau President Health Resources and Services Administration March of Dimes Birth Defects Organization Michael S. Watson, PhD (Project Director) American College of Medical Genetics Newborn Screening Expert Group R. Rodney Howell, MD (Chair) Fernando Guerra, MD, MPH American College of Medical Genetics San Antonio Metropolitan Health District University of Miami School of Medicine W. Harry Hannon, PhD (ex officio) William Becker, DO Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Association of Public Health Laboratories Ohio State Department of Health James Hanson, MD (ex officio) Ohio State University National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Coleen Boyle, PhD (ex officio) National Institutes of Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cecilia Larson, MD George C. Cunningham, MD, MPH New England Newborn Screening Program Genetics Disease Branch California Department of Health Services Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear, MD, PhD (ex officio) Maternal and Child Health Bureau Michael R. DeBaun, MD, MPH Health Resources and Services Administration Washington University School of Medicine Marie Y. Mann, MD, MPH (ex officio) (Project Stephen M. Downs, MD Officer) Indiana University School of Medicine Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Edward Goldman, JD University of Michigan Hospitals Scott McLean, MD, LTC, MC (ex officio) and Health System United States Army Stephen I. Goodman, MD Gurvaneet Randhawa, MD, MPH (ex officio) University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2 Piero Rinaldo, MD, PhD Bradford Therrell, PhD Mayo Clinic College of Medicine National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center Derek Robertson, MBA, JD University of Texas Health Science Center Healthcare Consultant/Family Representative at San Antonio Mark Rothstein, JD Thomas Tonniges, MD University of Louisville American Academy of Pediatrics Robert D. Steiner, MD Wanda Yazzie, RN, MPH Oregon Health & Science University New Mexico Department of Health Sonia Suter, MS, JD Michael S. Watson, PhD (Project Director) George Washington University Law School American College of Medical Genetics Newborn Screening Conditions and Criteria Work Group Piero Rinaldo, MD, PhD (Chair) Kenneth Pass, PhD Mayo Clinic College of Medicine New York State Department of Health Association of Public Health Laboratories Donald Bailey, PhD (Family Representative) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Jennifer M. Puck, MD National Human Genome Research Institute Celia I. Kaye, PhD, MD National Institutes of Health University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Bradford Therrell, PhD National Newborn Screening Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH and Genetics Resource Center University of Michigan Health System University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear, MD, PhD Maternal and Child Health Bureau Michael S. Watson, PhD (Project Director) Health Resources and Services Administration American College of Medical Genetics Marie Y. Mann, MD, MPH (Project Officer) Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Newborn Screening External Review Group Franklin Desposito, MD Arnold Strauss, MD University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Jersey Tracy Trotter, MD Gary Hoffman Private pediatric practice, California Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene Anne M. Willey, PhD, JD Kathy Stagni Association of Public Health Laboratories Organic Acidemia Association New York State Department of Health 3 Newborn Screening Diagnosis and Follow-up Work Group Harvey L. Levy, MD (Chair) Danielle Laraque, MD Children’s Hospital Boston Mt. Sinai School of Medicine Harvard Medical School Kelly R. Leight, JD (Family Representative) James R. Eckman, MD CARES Foundation Emory University School of Medicine Derek Robertson, MBA, JD Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear, MD, PhD Healthcare Consultant/Family Representative Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Bradford Therrell, PhD National Newborn Screening Fred Lorey, PhD and Genetics Resource Center California Department of Health Services University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Marie Y. Mann, MD, MPH (Project Officer) Maternal and Child Health Bureau Michael S. Watson, PhD (Project Director) Health Resources and Services Administration American College of Medical Genetics Deborah L. Marsden, MBBS Barbara Yawn, MD Children’s Hospital Boston American Academy of Family Physicians Harvard Medical School Julie Miller, BS Nebraska Department of Health Newborn Screening HIPAA Work Group Edward B. Goldman, JD (Chair) Lynn D. Fleisher, PhD, JD University of Michigan Hospitals Sidley, Austin, Brown and Wood and Health System Mark Rothstein, JD Coleen Boyle, PhD University of Louisville Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health Resources and Services Administration Sonia Suter, MS, JD George Washington University Law School Beverly Dozier Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health Resources and Services Administration 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................7 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................12 SECTION I: DEVELOPING A UNIFORM SCREENING PANEL.............................................14 A. Background.......................................................................................................................14 B. Methods Used for Assessing Conditions...........................................................................25 C. Results...............................................................................................................................49 D. Discussion.........................................................................................................................54 E. Summary ...........................................................................................................................76 SECTION II: THE NEWBORN SCREENING SYSTEM: PROGRAM EVALUATION, COST- EFFECTIVENESS, INFORMATION NEEDS, AND FUTURE NEEDS.......................78 A. The Newborn Screening System........................................................................................78 B. Program Evaluation..........................................................................................................89 C. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ..............................................................................................94 D. Information Gaps and a Research Agenda ......................................................................95 E. Future Needs.....................................................................................................................98 F. Summary .........................................................................................................................100 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................102 FIGURES, APPENDICES AND BOX FIGURES Figure 1: Raw Data For Mcad Deficiency (16 Of 90 Total Respondents)..................................109 Figure 2: Raw Data For Pku (16 Of 120 Total Respondents).....................................................110 Figures 3a – 3e: Side-By-Side Comparison Of Mcad And Pku for the Criteria Used................111 Figure 4: Final Scores (Sum Of Mean Scores) For All Conditions ............................................116 Figure 5: Survey Scores Sorted By Testing Platforms................................................................117 Figure 6: Scores By Test Availability (Test/No Test).................................................................118 Figure 7: Scores For All Conditions Distinguished By Screening Panel Category....................119 Figure 8: Distribution Of Conditions Into Screening Panel Categories......................................119 Figure 9: Survey Scores Sorted By Testing Platforms................................................................121 Figure 10: National State Quality Assurance And Oversight For Newborn Screening Program Components.....................................................................................................................122 5 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Newborn Screening Fact Sheet Validation & Fact Sheets .....................................123 Appendix 2: Condition Evaluation Tool .....................................................................................308 Appendix 3: Condition ACT(ion) Sheets....................................................................................309 Appendix 4: Program
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hyperammonemia in Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
    Pediatr Nephrol DOI 10.1007/s00467-011-1838-5 EDUCATIONAL REVIEW Hyperammonemia in review: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment Ari Auron & Patrick D. Brophy Received: 23 September 2010 /Revised: 9 January 2011 /Accepted: 12 January 2011 # IPNA 2011 Abstract Ammonia is an important source of nitrogen and is the breakdown and catabolism of dietary and bodily proteins, required for amino acid synthesis. It is also necessary for respectively. In healthy individuals, amino acids that are not normal acid-base balance. When present in high concentra- needed for protein synthesis are metabolized in various tions, ammonia is toxic. Endogenous ammonia intoxication chemical pathways, with the rest of the nitrogen waste being can occur when there is impaired capacity of the body to converted to urea. Ammonia is important for normal animal excrete nitrogenous waste, as seen with congenital enzymatic acid-base balance. During exercise, ammonia is produced in deficiencies. A variety of environmental causes and medica- skeletal muscle from deamination of adenosine monophos- tions may also lead to ammonia toxicity. Hyperammonemia phate and amino acid catabolism. In the brain, the latter refers to a clinical condition associated with elevated processes plus the activity of glutamate dehydrogenase ammonia levels manifested by a variety of symptoms and mediate ammonia production. After formation of ammonium signs, including significant central nervous system (CNS) from glutamine, α-ketoglutarate, a byproduct, may be abnormalities. Appropriate and timely management requires a degraded to produce two molecules of bicarbonate, which solid understanding of the fundamental pathophysiology, are then available to buffer acids produced by dietary sources. differential diagnosis, and treatment approaches available.
    [Show full text]
  • Propionic Acidemia Information for Health Professionals
    Propionic Acidemia Information for Health Professionals Propionic acidemia is an organic acid disorder in which individuals are lacking or have reduced activity of the enzyme propionyl-CoA carboxylase, leading to propionic acidemia. Clinical Symptoms Symptoms generally begin in the first few days following birth. Metabolic crisis can occur, particularly after fasting, periods of illness/infection, high protein intake, or during periods of stress on the body. Symptoms of a metabolic crisis include lethargy, behavior changes, feeding problems, hypotonia, and vomiting. If untreated, metabolic crises can lead to tachypnea, brain swelling, cardiomyopathy, seizures, coma, basal ganglia stroke, and death. Many babies die within the first year of life. Lab findings during a metabolic crisis commonly include urine ketones, hyperammonemia, metabolic acidosis, low platelets, low white blood cells, and high blood ammonia and glycine levels. Long term effects may occur despite treatment and include developmental delay, brain damage, dystonia, failure to thrive, short stature, spasticity, pancreatitis, osteoporosis, and skin lesions. Incidence Propionic acidemia occurs in greater than 1 in 75,000 live births and is more common in Saudi Arabians and the Inuit population of Greenland. Genetics of propionic acidemia Mutations in the PCCA and PCCB genes cause propionic acidemia. Mutations prevent the production of or reduce the activity of propionyl-CoA carboxylase, which converts propionyl-CoA to methylmalonyl-CoA. This causes the body to be unable to correctly process isoleucine, valine, methionine, and threonine, resulting in an accumulation of glycine and propionic acid, which causes the symptoms seen in this condition. How do people inherit propionic acidemia? Propionic acidemia is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Newborn Screening Laboratory Manual of Services
    Newborn Screening Laboratory Manual of Services Test Panel: Please see the following links for a detailed description of testing in the Newborn Screening section. Information about the Newborn Screening program is available here. Endocrine Disorders Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) Congenital hypothyroidism (TSH) Hemoglobinopathies Sickle cell disease (FS) Alpha (Barts) Sickle βeta Thalassemia (FSA) Other sickling hemoglobinopathies such as: FAS FAC FAD FAE Homozygous conditions such as: FC FD FE Metabolic Disorders Biotinidase deficiency Galactosemia Cystic fibrosis (CF) first tier screening for elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) Cystic fibrosis second tier genetic mutation analysis on the top 4% IRT concentrations. Current alleles detected : F508del, I507del, G542X, G85E, R117H, 621+1G->T, 711+1G->T, R334W, R347P, A455E, 1717-1G->A, R560T, R553X, G551D, 1898+1G->A, 2184delA, 2789+5G->A, 3120+1G->A, R1162X, 3659delC, 3849+10kbC->T, W1282X, N1303K, IVS polyT T5/T7/T9 *Currently validating a mutation panel that includes the above alleles in addition to the following: 1078delT, Y122X, 394delTT, R347H, M1101K, S1255X, 1898+5G->T, 2183AA->G, 2307insA, Y1092X, 3876delA, 3905insT, S549N, S549R_1645A->C, S549R-1647T->G, S549R-1647T->G, V520F, A559T, 1677delTA, 2055del9->A, 2143delT, 3199del6, 406-1G->A, 935delA, D1152H, CFTRdele2, E60X, G178R, G330X, K710X, L206W, Q493X, Q890X, R1066C, R1158X, R75X, S1196X, W1089X, G1244E, G1349D, G551S, R560KT, S1251N, S1255P Amino acid disorders Phenylketonuria (PKU) / Hyperphenylalaninemia Maple
    [Show full text]
  • Disorders Included in the Newborn Screening Panel Disorders
    Disorders Included in the Newborn Screening Panel Disorders Detected by Tandem Mass Spectrometry Acylcarnitine Profile Amino Acid Profile Fatty Acid Oxidation Disorders Amino Acid Disorders Carnitine/Acylcarnitine Translocase Deficiency Argininemia 1 Carnitine Palmitoyl Transferase Deficiency Type I Argininosuccinic Aciduria 1 3-Hydroxy Long Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase 5-Oxoprolinuria 1 Deficiency Carbamoylphosphate Synthetase Deficiency 1 2,4-Dienoyl-CoA Reductase Deficiency Citrullinemia Medium Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency Homocystinuria Multiple Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency Hypermethioninemia Neonatal Carnitine Palmitoyl Transferase Deficiency Hyperammonemia, Hyperornithinemia, Homocitrullinuria Type II Syndrome1 1 Short Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency Hyperornithinemia with Gyral Atrophy Short Chain Hydroxy Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Maple Syrup Urine Disease Deficiency Phenylketonuria Trifunctional Protein Deficiency Classical/Hyperphenylalaninemia Very Long Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency Biopterin Cofactor Deficiencies Tyrosinemia Organic Acid Disorders Transient Neonatal Tyrosinemia 2 Tyrosinemia Type I 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-CoA Lyase Deficiency Tyrosinemia Type II Glutaric Acidemia Type I Tyrosinemia Type III Isobutyryl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency Isovaleric Acidemia 2-Methylbutyryl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency 3-Methylcrotonyl-CoA Carboxylase Deficiency Other Observations 3-Methylglutaconyl-CoA Hydratase Deficiency Methylmalonic Acidemias Hyperalimentation Methylmalonyl-CoA Mutase Deficiency
    [Show full text]
  • Arginine-Provider-Fact-Sheet.Pdf
    Arginine (Urea Cycle Disorder) Screening Fact Sheet for Health Care Providers Newborn Screening Program of the Oklahoma State Department of Health What is the differential diagnosis? Argininemia (arginase deficiency, hyperargininemia) What are the characteristics of argininemia? Disorders of arginine metabolism are included in a larger group of disorders, known as urea cycle disorders. Argininemia is an autosomal recessive inborn error of metabolism caused by a defect in the final step in the urea cycle. Most infants are born to parents who are both unknowingly asymptomatic carriers and have NO known history of a urea cycle disorder in their family. The incidence of all urea cycle disorders is estimated to be about 1:8,000 live births. The true incidence of argininemia is not known, but has been estimated between 1:350,000 and 1:1,000,000. Argininemia is usually asymptomatic in the neonatal period, although it can present with mild to moderate hyperammonemia. Untreated, argininemia usually progresses to severe spasticity, loss of ambulation, severe cognitive and intellectual disabilities and seizures Lifelong treatment includes a special diet, and special care during times of illness or stress. What is the screening methodology for argininemia? 1. An amino acid profile by Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) is performed on each filter paper. 2. Arginine is the primary analyte. What is an in-range (normal) screen result for arginine? Arginine less than 100 mol/L is NOT consistent with argininemia. See Table 1. TABLE 1. In-range Arginine Newborn Screening Results What is an out-of-range (abnormal) screen for arginine? Arginine > 100 mol/L requires further testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Current Practices Report
    18/10/2011 EU Tender “Evaluation of population newborn screening practices for rare disorders in Member States of the European Union” Short Executive Summary of the Report on the practices of newborn screening for rare disorders implemented in Member States of the European Union, Candidate, Potential Candidate and EFTA Countries Authors: Peter Burgard1, Martina Cornel2, Francesco Di Filippo4, Gisela Haege1, Georg F. Hoffmann1, Martin Lindner1, J. Gerard Loeber3, Tessel Rigter2, Kathrin Rupp1, 4 Domenica Taruscio4,Luciano Vittozzi , Stephanie Weinreich2 1 Department of Pediatrics , University Hospital - Heidelberg (DE) 2 VU University Medical Centre - Amsterdam (NL) 3 RIVM - Bilthoven (NL) 4 National Centre for Rare Diseases - Rome (IT) The opinions expressed in this document are those of the Contractor only and do not represent the official position of the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers. This work is funded by the European Union with a grant of Euro 399755 (Contract number 2009 62 06 of the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers) 1 18/10/2011 Abbreviations 3hmg 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaric aciduria 3mcc 3-Methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency/3-Methylglutacon aciduria/2-methyl-3-OH- butyric aciduria AAD Disorders of amino acid metabolism arg Argininemia asa Argininosuccinic aciduria bio Biotinidase deficiency bkt Beta-ketothiolase deficiency btha S, beta 0-thalassemia cah Congenital adrenal hyperplasia cf Cystic fibrosis ch Primary congenital hypothyroidism citI Citrullinemia type I citII Citrullinemia type II cpt I Carnitin
    [Show full text]
  • What Disorders Are Screened for by the Newborn Screen?
    What disorders are screened for by the newborn screen? Endocrine Disorders The endocrine system is important to regulate the hormones in our bodies. Hormones are special signals sent to various parts of the body. They control many things such as growth and development. The goal of newborn screening is to identify these babies early so that treatment can be started to keep them healthy. To learn more about these specific disorders please click on the name of the disorder below: English: Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Esapnol Hiperplasia Suprarrenal Congenital - - http://www.newbornscreening.info/Parents/otherdisorders/CAH.html - http://www.newbornscreening.info/spanish/parent/Other_disorder/CAH.html - Congenital Hypothyroidism (Hipotiroidismo Congénito) - http://www.newbornscreening.info/Parents/otherdisorders/CH.html - http://www.newbornscreening.info/spanish/parent/Other_disorder/CH.html Hematologic Conditions Hemoglobin is a special part of our red blood cells. It is important for carrying oxygen to the parts of the body where it is needed. When people have problems with their hemoglobin they can have intense pain, and they often get sick more than other children. Over time, the lack of oxygen to the body can cause damage to the organs. The goal of newborn screening is to identify babies with these conditions so that they can get early treatment to help keep them healthy. To learn more about these specific disorders click here (XXX). - Sickle Cell Anemia (Anemia de Célula Falciforme) - http://www.newbornscreening.info/Parents/otherdisorders/SCD.html - http://www.newbornscreening.info/spanish/parent/Other_disorder/SCD.html - SC Disease (See Previous Link) - Sickle Beta Thalassemia (See Previous Link) Enzyme Deficiencies Enzymes are special proteins in our body that allow for chemical reactions to take place.
    [Show full text]
  • Newborn Screening & Genetics
    NEWBORN SCREENING ® 2 0 1 9 & GENETICS UNMET NEEDS • Funding for equipment, qualified staff and infrastructure changes to accommodate new testing • Funding for test development and validation • Quality assurance materials that reflect increased complexity of disease markers and address state’s expanding needs • Coordinated efforts nationwide in leading novel advances (e.g., next generation sequencing, electronic data exchange, etc.) in public health laboratories for newborn screening BACKGROUND NEWBORN SCREENING SAVES LIVES ACT Newborn screening (NBS) saves lives. Each year, over Recognizing the need for federal guidance and resources 12,000 newborn lives are changed because of the early to assist states in improving their NBS programs, detection and intervention NBS makes possible. NBS Congress enacted the Newborn Screening Saves Lives is one of the largest and most effective public health Act (P.L. 110-204) in 2008 and its reauthorization in interventions in the US, saving and improving the lives of 2014 (P.L. 113-240), ensuring: children, families and communities. • Enhanced state programs to provide screening, NBS is not a diagnostic test, but rather it determines counseling and healthcare services to newborns and a baby’s risk for certain genetic, metabolic, congenital children. and/or functional disorders. Abnormal screening results • Assistance in educating healthcare professionals cue healthcare providers to pursue additional diagnostic about screening and training in relevant new testing to determine if the baby has the disorder in technologies. question. If diagnosed early, these heritable conditions • Development and delivery of educational programs can be cured or successfully treated. about NBS counseling, testing, follow-up, treatment Almost all infants born in the US (about 98%) undergo and specialty services to parents, families and patient NBS, however, the number and types of disorders for advocacy and support groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Citrulline Amino Aciduria/Urea Cycle Disorder
    Newborn Screening ACT Sheet Increased Citrulline Amino Aciduria/Urea Cycle Disorder Differential Diagnosis: Citrullinemia I, argininosuccinic acidemia; citrullinemia II (citrin deficiency), pyruvate carboxylase deficiency. Condition Description: The urea cycle is the enzyme cycle whereby ammonia is converted to urea. In citrullinemia and in argininosuccinic acidemia, defects in ASA synthetase and lyase, respectively, in the urea cycle result in hyperammonemia and elevated citrulline. Medical Emergency: Take the Following IMMEDIATE Actions Contact family to inform them of the newborn screening result and ascertain clinical status (poor feeding, vomiting, lethargy, tachypnea). Immediately consult with pediatric metabolic specialist. (See attached list.) Evaluate the newborn (poor feeding, vomiting, lethargy, hypotonia, tachypnea, seizures and signs of liver disease). Measure blood ammonia. If any sign is present or infant is ill, initiate emergency treatment for hyperammonemia in consultation with metabolic specialist. Transport to hospital for further treatment in consultation with metabolic specialist. Initiate timely confirmatory/diagnostic testing and management, as recommended by specialist. Initial testing: Immediate plasma ammonia, plasma quantitative amino acids. Repeat newborn screen if second screen has not been done. Provide family with basic information about hyperammonemia. Report findings to newborn screening program. Diagnostic Evaluation: Plasma ammonia to determine presence of hyperammonemia. In citrullinemia, plasma amino
    [Show full text]
  • Newborn Screening for X-ALD Can Happen Along with Routine Newborn Screening for Other Conditions in the First Few Days of Life
    Newborn Screening for X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy A Summary of the Evidence and Advisory Committee Decision Report Date: 14 October 2015 This summary was prepared under a contract to Duke University from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the Health and Resources and Services Administration (Contract Number: HHSH250201500002I/HHSH25034003T). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This summary reviews the information the federal advisory committee used when deciding whether to recommend adding X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in 2015. About the condition X-ALD is a rare disorder caused by a change in a single human gene. Studies of patients with symptoms suggest that about 2-3 out of every 100,000 people have X-ALD. People with X-ALD do not have enough of a protein that helps the body break down certain types of fats. Babies with X-ALD look normal. There are different types of X-ALD that can cause problems with the adrenal glands, brain, and spinal cord. Without treatment, these problems can worsen quickly and cause death during childhood. X-ALD usually affects boys more severely than girls. Treatment for X-ALD There is no cure for X-ALD. Early diagnosis allows early monitoring and treatment for babies with X-ALD. Available treatments include cortisol replacement and human stem cell transplant. The treatment a patient needs depends on many factors, like the type of X-ALD. Detecting X-ALD in newborns Newborn screening for X-ALD can happen along with routine newborn screening for other conditions in the first few days of life.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY of PEDIATRICS Reimbursement For
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS POLICY STATEMENT Organizational Principles to Guide and Define the Child Health Care System and/or Improve the Health of All Children Committee on Nutrition Reimbursement for Foods for Special Dietary Use ABSTRACT. Foods for special dietary use are recom- DEFINITION OF FOODS FOR SPECIAL mended by physicians for chronic diseases or conditions DIETARY USE of childhood, including inherited metabolic diseases. Al- The US Food and Drug Administration, in the though many states have created legislation requiring Code of Federal Regulations,2 defines special dietary reimbursement for foods for special dietary use, legisla- use of foods as the following: tion is now needed to mandate consistent coverage and reimbursement for foods for special dietary use and re- a. Uses for supplying particular dietary needs that lated support services with accepted medical benefit for exist by reason of a physical, physiologic, patho- children with designated medical conditions. logic, or other condition, including but not limited to the conditions of diseases, convalescence, preg- ABBREVIATION. AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics. nancy, lactation, allergic hypersensitivity to food, [and being] underweight and overweight; b. Uses for supplying particular dietary needs which BACKGROUND exist by reason of age, including but not limited to pecial foods are recommended by physicians to the ages of infancy and childhood; foster normal growth and development in some c. Uses for supplementing or fortifying the ordinary or usual diet with any vitamin, mineral, or other children and to prevent serious disability and S dietary property. Any such particular use of a even death in others. Many of these special foods are food is a special dietary use, regardless of whether technically specialized formulas for which there may such food also purports to be or is represented for be a relatively small market, which makes them more general use.
    [Show full text]
  • American Academy of Pediatrics Newborn Screening Task Force Recommendations: How Far Have We Come?
    SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE American Academy of Pediatrics Newborn Screening Task Force Recommendations: How Far Have We Come? Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear, MD, PhDa, Thomas Tonniges, MD, FAAPb, Peter C. van Dyck, MD, MPH, FAAPa, Marie Y. Mann, MD, MPH, FAAPa, Amy Brin, MAb, Kay Johnson, MPHc, Merle McPherson, MD, FAAPa aHealth Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland; bAmerican Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois; cJohnson Consulting Group, Hinesburg, Vermont The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. ABSTRACT The partnership of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)/ Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and the American Academy of Pedi- atrics (AAP) for improving health care for all children has long been recognized. In www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/ peds.2005-2633B 1998, the establishment of the Newborn Screening Task Force marked a major doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2633B initiative in addressing the needs of the newborn screening system. At the request Dr Tonniges’ current affiliation is Boystown of HRSA/MCHB, the AAP convened the task force to ensure that pediatric clini- Institute for Child Health Improvement, cians assumed a leadership role in examining the totality of the newborn screening Omaha, NE; Ms Brin is currently enrolled in the School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University system, including the necessary linkage to medical homes. The task force’s report, Key Words published in 2000, outlined major recommendations for federal, state, and other newborn screening, medical home, system national partners in addressing the identified barriers and needed enhancements integration, federal initiatives, newborn of the care delivery system.
    [Show full text]