DOCSLIB.ORG

BBC Trust Unit 180 Great Portland Street London W1W 5QZ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BBC Trust Unit 180 Great Portland Street London W1W 5QZ Editorial Standards Findings Appeals to the Trust and other editorial issues considered by the Editorial Standards Committee September 2010 issued October 2010 Getting the best out of the BBC for licence fee payers Editorial Standards Findings/Appeals to the Trust and other editorial issues considered byContents the Editorial Standards Committee Remit of the Editorial Standards Committee 1 Summary of findings 3 Findings 8 Newsnight, BBC Two, 19 January 2010 8 Newsnight, BBC Two, 19 January 2010 20 The World at One, BBC Radio 4, 8 December 2009 38 To Let, BBC Two, 20 December 2009 – Complaints Handling 44 The Culture Show, BBC Two, 4 February 2010 49 Rejected appeals 65 Fly Me To The Reverend Moon, BBC Radio 4, 19 April 2010 65 To Let, BBC Two, 29 December 2009 68 The Big Questions, BBC One (General complaint – bias against Muslims) 70 The Review Show, BBC Two, 26 February 2010 72 Scapegoat, BBC Northern Ireland, 26 October 2009 74 BBC News website reporting on Gaza conflict (2009) 77 Today, BBC Radio 4, 27 January 2010 80 Systemic bias on climate change 82 September 2010 issued October 2010 Editorial Standards Findings/Appeals to the Trust and other editorial issues considered by the Editorial Standards Committee Remit of the Editorial Standards Committee The Editorial Standards Committee (ESC) is responsible for assisting the Trust in securing editorial standards. It has a number of responsibilities, set out in its Terms of Reference at bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/about/meetings_and_minutes/bbc_trust_committees.html. The Committee comprises six Trustees: Richard Tait (Chairman), Chitra Bharucha, Mehmuda Mian, David Liddiment, Alison Hastings and Anthony Fry. It is advised and supported by the Trust Unit. In line with the ESC’s responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of handling editorial complaints by BBC management, the Committee considers appeals against the decisions and actions of the BBC’s Editorial Complaints Unit (ECU) or of a BBC Director with responsibility for the BBC’s output (if the editorial complaint falls outside the remit of the ECU). The Committee will consider appeals concerning complaints which allege that: • the complainant has suffered unfair treatment either in a transmitted programme or item, or in the process of making the programme or item • the complainant’s privacy has been unjustifiably infringed, either in a transmitted programme or item, or in the process of making the programme or item • there has otherwise been a failure to observe required editorial standards The Committee will aim to reach a final decision on an appeal within 16 weeks of accepting the request. The findings for all appeals accepted by the Committee are reported in this bulletin, Editorial Complaints: Appeals to the Trust. As set out in its Terms of Reference, the Committee can decline to consider an appeal which in its opinion: • is vexatious or trivial; • does not raise a matter of substance; • relates to the content of a programme or item which has not yet been broadcast; • concerns issues of bias by omission in BBC news programmes unless the Chairman believes that it is plausible that the omission of an item could have led to a breach of the guidelines on impartiality; • has not been made within four weeks of the final correspondence with the ECU or BBC Director on the original complaint; and • relates to matters which are the subject of or likely to be the subject of, or relevant to, legal proceedings. The Committee will not generally reconsider any aspects of complaints that have already been adjudicated upon or considered by a Court. Any appeals that the Committee has declined to consider under the above criteria are reported in the bulletin. September 2010 issued October 2010 1 Editorial Standards Findings/Appeals to the Trust and other editorial issues considered by the Editorial Standards Committee In line with its duty to consider topics of editorial concern to the Committee, whether or not such concern arises from a formal complaint, and to commission information requests from the Trust Unit or Executive to support such consideration, the Committee also from time to time requests the Executive to report to the Committee regarding breaches which have been accepted by the Executive and are therefore not subject to appeal to the Committee. The bulletin also may contain findings relating to such cases. The bulletin also includes any remedial action/s directed by the Committee. It is published at bbc.co.uk/bbctrust or is available from: The Secretary, Editorial Standards Committee BBC Trust Unit 180 Great Portland Street London W1W 5QZ September 2010 issued October 2010 2 Editorial Standards Findings/Appeals to the Trust and other editorial issues considered by the Editorial Standards Committee Summary of findings Newsnight, BBC Two, 19 January 2010 The complainant said that a report by Colonel Tim Collins on the first anniversary of the end of Operation Cast Lead was inaccurate and biased against the Palestinians. The Committee concluded: • that it considered Colonel Collins’ report to be the authored view of a military specialist, covering a controversial subject, as defined by the guidelines. • that, with regard to Colonel Collins’ comments on the possible storage of explosives in a mosque, it had been made very clear in the narrative – and the audience would have understood – that he was presenting a personal view, albeit one based on experience, rather than presenting forensically tested facts. • that no inaccuracy or bias had been introduced into the part of the report dealing with claims of weapons storage in a mosque. • that the scale of the disparity in the figures for Israeli and Palestinian deaths had been made very clear in Jeremy Paxman’s introduction to the report and no further elaboration was needed. • that the impartiality guidelines had not been breached with regard to the disparity in the figures for Palestinian and Israeli deaths. • that it was not necessary to provide fuller context on the events before Operation Cast Lead for this item to achieve due accuracy and impartiality. • that the Newsnight audience would have been likely to have had some understanding of the background and context of the conflict and would have had an appreciation of the Israeli army’s strength. • that, while Colonel Collins had not directly contrasted the differences between Palestinian and Israeli weaponry, the references to Israeli armaments and descriptions of the effects of the Israeli shelling and the damage it had caused would have provided sufficient information for the Newsnight audience to have had an understanding of the difference in the armaments being used by the two sides in the conflict. • that Colonel Collins had not, as the complainant suggested “seemed unmoved by the evidence in front of him”, but had shown clearly the damage caused by Israeli armaments. • that the report did not breach the impartiality guidelines with regard to setting out the relative military strengths of the Israeli and Palestinian forces. • that Colonel Collins’ comments regarding an Israeli tank attack on a block of flats had raised the questionability of the action of the tank crew as well as providing a reason for it from a military perspective and had not been in breach of the impartiality guidelines. • that, looking at the programme as a whole, the piece had been editorially justified and had been duly impartial when considering the issue from a uniquely personal perspective. The complaint was not upheld. September 2010 issued October 2010 3 Editorial Standards Findings/Appeals to the Trust and other editorial issues considered by the Editorial Standards Committee For the finding in full see pages 8 to 19. Newsnight, BBC Two, 19 January 2010 The complainant said that a Newsnight report by Colonel Tim Collins to mark the first anniversary of the end of the Israeli army’s Operation Cast Lead had been inaccurate and biased against the Palestinians. The complainant also objected to the Editorial Complaints Unit’s handling of the complaint. The Committee concluded: • that the figures given in the introduction to the report for Israeli and Palestinian deaths were duly accurate. • that the inaccuracy in the opening aerial sequence was not material to the substance of the piece and the accuracy guidelines had not been breached. • that, given the objectives of this film, it was not possible to examine the motivations of players and wider historical context of what was a complex and disputed situation. • that a Newsnight audience would be expected to have a broad understanding of the context of the report and thus would not require a specific narrative on the background to the conflict. • that the editorial guidelines had not been breached with regard to representing the Palestinian view. • that, with regard to the interview conducted with Palestinian rocketeers, the interviewees had not been disadvantaged by their standard of spoken English. • that, given the context of the report, it was perfectly reasonable for Colonel Collins to express a personal opinion of the Hamas posters. • that it had been made very clear in Jeremy Paxman’s introduction to the film that Israel had also been accused of war crimes. • that, taken as a whole, the report was impartial in relation to the accusations about war crimes. • that the Newsnight audience would have been likely to have had some understanding of the background and context of the conflict and would have had an appreciation of the Israeli army’s strength. • that, while Colonel Collins had not directly contrasted the differences between the Palestinian and Israeli weaponry, the references to Israeli armaments and descriptions of the effects of the Israeli shelling and the damage it had caused would have provided sufficient information for the Newsnight audience to have had an understanding of the difference in the armaments being used by the two sides in the conflict.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Graduation 2014. Monday 21 July 2014 the University of Sheffield
    Graduation 2014. Monday 21 July 2014 The University of Sheffield Your graduation day is a special day for you and your family, a day for celebrating your achievements and looking forward to a bright future. As a graduate of the University of Sheffield you have every reason to be proud. You are joining a long tradition of excellence stretching back more than 100 years. The University of Sheffield was founded with the amalgamation of the School of Medicine, Sheffield Technical School and Firth College. In 1905, we received a Royal Charter and Firth Court was officially opened by King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra. At that time, there were 363 students reading for degrees in arts, pure science, medicine and applied science. By the time of our centenary, there were over 25,000 students from more than 100 countries, across 70 academic departments. Today, a degree from Sheffield is recognised all over the world as a hallmark of academic excellence. We are proud of our graduates and we are confident that you will make a difference wherever you choose to build your future. With every generation of graduates, our university goes from strength to strength. This is the original fundraising poster from 1904/1905 which helped raise donations for the University of Sheffield. Over £50,000 (worth more than £15 million today) was donated by steelworkers, coal miners, factory workers and the people of Sheffield in penny donations to help found the University. A century on, the University is now rated as one of the top world universities – according to the Shanghai Jiao Tong Academic Ranking of World Universities.
    [Show full text]
  • FBU Firefighter Magazine • October/November 2916
    THE MAGAZINE OF THE FIRE BRIGADES UNION | WWW.FBU.ORG.UK OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2016 SAFETY FOR SALE TIMES HAVE CHANGED THE RISKS HAVE NOT SEE P14 Plus FBU AT THE LABOUR PARTY CONFERENCE SEE P10 FIREFIGHTER FATALITIES: MORE THAN JUST GUIDANCE NEEDED SEE P12 GENERAL SECRETARY’S COMMENT MATT WRACK CUTS, AND THOSE WHO FORCE THEM THROUGH, MUST BE RESISTED During September our BOX/REPORTDIGITAL.CO.UK PAUL current state of affairs where members in Greater response times are increasing, Manchester were facing a putting lives at risk. bleak future. We have campaigned More than 1,250 relentlessly over the past six firefighters faced the sack – years, warning politicians only those who agreed to sign that the scale of cuts to the up to worse conditions of fire and rescue service is service would be re-engaged. such that public safety is Greater Manchester seriously compromised. Fire and Rescue Service We now have fire authority has to find savings of more Rapid response – but continuing cuts will take effect members also publicly than £14m, but this is no expressing this fear, as the justification for threatening negotiating process was of mental ill health than the link between an increased such action. stopped, but our officials in rest of the population. response time and rising fire FBU officials mounted Greater Manchester are well We are proud that our deaths is inextricably linked. a vigorous campaign that aware that further battles lottery will see a higher But this government attracted a lot of public and lie ahead. They will get our percentage of the monies remains deaf to the political support.
    [Show full text]
  • English Is a Welsh Language
    ENGLISH IS A WELSH LANGUAGE Television’s crisis in Wales Edited by Geraint Talfan Davies Published in Wales by the Institute of Welsh Affairs. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means without the prior permission of the publishers. © Institute of Welsh Affairs, 2009 ISBN: 978 1 904773 42 9 English is a Welsh language Television’s crisis in Wales Edited by Geraint Talfan Davies The Institute of Welsh Affairs exists to promote quality research and informed debate affecting the cultural, social, political and economic well-being of Wales. IWA is an independent organisation owing no allegiance to any political or economic interest group. Our only interest is in seeing Wales flourish as a country in which to work and live. We are funded by a range of organisations and individuals. For more information about the Institute, its publications, and how to join, either as an individual or corporate supporter, contact: IWA - Institute of Welsh Affairs 4 Cathedral Road Cardiff CF11 9LJ tel 029 2066 0820 fax 029 2023 3741 email [email protected] web www.iwa.org.uk Contents 1 Preface 4 1/ English is a Welsh language, Geraint Talfan Davies 22 2/ Inventing Wales, Patrick Hannan 30 3/ The long goodbye, Kevin Williams 36 4/ Normal service, Dai Smith 44 5/ Small screen, big screen, Peter Edwards 50 6/ The drama of belonging, Catrin Clarke 54 7/ Convergent realities, John Geraint 62 8/ Standing up among the cogwheels, Colin Thomas 68 9/ Once upon a time, Trevor
    [Show full text]
  • Truth, Yes … but Justice?
    SUMMER 2016 TRUTH, YES … BUT JUSTICE? REMEMBER THE 96 2 FOODWORKER EDITOR’S SUMMER 2016 NOTES TRUTH, YES "… Jeremy Corbyn is … BUT the leader, get over JUSTICE? it and unite for the benefit of those you purport to represent" REMEMBER THE 96 "Ronnie Draper @ronniebfawu INSIDE THIS ISSUE: As we approach Annual Conference, We don’t want a return to the disloyalty of Editor’s Notes . 2 which will be held in Southport, the time to 1981 when the gang of four Roy Jenkins, reflect on where the political landscape has David Owen, Shirley Williams and Bill National President . 3 moved over the last year is upon us. If we Rogers left the party to form the SDP Dennis Nash presentation . .4 are honest the only significant political although if that is the only way that we are FastFood Day of Action . .5 change has been the landslide election of going to rid our party of the treachery that Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader and appears to abound then so be it. Trade Union Bill . 6 the massive increase in the number of Who is the common enemy? Thank You Pauls! . 6 grassroots members who have joined in the Working people and the disadvantaged in our Womens' TUC Conference . .7 hope that we will see a move to a more society are under constant attack from the socialist agenda. most heinous government in living memory. Signature Flatbreads . .8 Labour = Loyalty? We and all those that we elected to Poverty Wages make us Ill! . 8 Since that day we have seen a number of parliament should be concentrating all our efforts on defeating the common enemy We are Wakefield .
    [Show full text]
  • We Must Unite Behind Progressive Policies and Become the Force That the Party’S Talent Deserves to Be
    AUTUMN 2016 We must unite behind progressive policies and become the force that the party’s talent deserves to be THIS IS A DECISION FOR ALL MEMBERS – NOT JUST THE PLP! 2 FOODWORKER EDITOR’S AUTUMN 2016 We must we NOTES unite behind progressive policies and become the force that the party’s "Hammering terms talent deserves to be and conditions is not the way to get a productive, proactive workforce" THIS IS A DECISION FOR ALL MEMBERS – NOT JUST THE PLP! "Ronnie Draper @ronniebfawu INSIDE THIS ISSUE: If anyone was ever in doubt about the from Eastern Europe for the dramatic Editor’s Notes . 2 negative effect a Tory government would reduction in wage levels, housing shortages have on those at the bottom of the wage and lengthening waiting times within the National President . 3 pile, you need look no further than the so NHS. Again this is massively wide of the Kumaran Bose . 5 called 'living wage', brought in by former mark. Migrant labour does not reduce Conference Report . 6 Chancellor, George Osborne. wage rates but opportunist employers do, After years which have seen pay freezes, employers who exploit financial situations Bill Morris' Conference Diary .10 the bedroom tax, cuts to in-work benefits, abroad to create a myth that is propagated by the right wing press. HEALTH & SAFETY hikes in VAT and the repeal of protective legislation, we now have a joke living wage We are the 5th richest economy in the National Safety that has been a green light for unscrupulous world run by a government who create Committee Update .
    [Show full text]
  • As Used on the Famous Nelson Mandela: Underground Adventures in the Arms and Torture Trade Pdf
    FREE AS USED ON THE FAMOUS NELSON MANDELA: UNDERGROUND ADVENTURES IN THE ARMS AND TORTURE TRADE PDF Mark Thomas | 352 pages | 28 Sep 2007 | Ebury Publishing | 9780091909222 | English | London, United Kingdom As Used On the Famous Nelson Mandela by Mark Thomas - Penguin Books Australia Mark Clifford Thomas born 11 April is an English comedianpresenter, political satirist and journalist from south London. Thomas describes himself as a " libertarian anarchist ". Mark Thomas was born in South London. His mother was a midwife and his father a self-employed builder and ex- lay preacher. He then won a scholarship to attend the independent Christ's Hospital School, where he attained O-levels and A-levels in English, history, and politics and economics. During his time at Bretton Hall, he made his debut as a performer, co-writing and performing satirical sketches at Wakefield Labour Club. After graduating, Thomas subsequently embarked on his comedy career, initially supporting himself through working on building sites with his father. Thomas' early exposure to comedy was through watching and listening to Dave AllenSteptoe and SonThe Goon Show and Tony As Used on the Famous Nelson Mandela: Underground Adventures in the Arms and Torture Trade ; his biggest influence was hearing a recording of Alexei Sayle : "It was like someone had kicked the door in - just As Used on the Famous Nelson Mandela: Underground Adventures in the Arms and Torture Trade to that tape and thinking that As Used on the Famous Nelson Mandela: Underground Adventures in the Arms and Torture Trade could do this stuff". Prior to his most renowned vehicle, The Mark Thomas Comedy ProductThomas was a frequent guest comic on the BBC Radio 1 show The Mary Whitehouse Experiencewhere he would do a routine about a specific topic of the week and involve studio audience members in the discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hacked Off Briefing Trinity Mirror Covered up Its Phone Hacking And
    Hacked Off Briefing Trinity Mirror covered up its phone hacking and blagging from victims MGN deliberately covered up its unlawful activities, which by their nature were both illicit and covert. It concealed them from victims at the time for fear that – had it been discovered that these activities were an integral element of how MGN titles were misusing private information to publish intrusive articles - victims would have taken steps to prevent such unlawful activities and/or their product. MGN has also taken active and dishonest steps to conceal the fact that, and extent to which, such unlawful means had been used, even after the event. Until as late as August 2014 MGN and Trinity Mirror Group plc (“TMG”), its parent company, deliberately lied and/or seriously mislead the public, by falsely denying or giving the false impression that these activities never took place at its newspaper titles, and that thorough investigations had confirmed that there was no evidence to suggest they had, even though they were in possession of significant evidence that it had. This is what we know so far 1. The admissions made by Dan Evans that he was instructed by senior MGN executives to take steps to conceal the nature of his phone hacking legal from potential victims, the use of untraceable pay-as-you-go phones which purchased and then disposed of and/or his knowledge of and involvement of the use of ‘legitimate’ means to stand up stories which had involved voicemail interception or the use of blagging or private investigators. 2. The nature and extent of the unlawful activities which were directed by or carried out (and not just known about) at editorial and executive level at all three newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuelling the Arms Race in South Asia
    CAATnews Fuelling the arms race in South Asia Issue 197 11 Goodwin Street, London N4 3HQ August/September 2006 Tel: 020 7281 0297 Fax: 020 7281 4369 £1.00 Email: [email protected] Website: www.caat.org.uk CAATnews IN THIS ISSUE... Editor James O’Nions [email protected] Legal Consultant Glen Reynolds Proofreader John Moseley Design Richie Andrew Contributors Kathryn Busby, Helen Close, Beccie D'Cunha, Ann Feltham, Symon Hill, Anna Jones, Alun Morinan, Ian Prichard, Mark Thomas, Rob Thorburn. Thank you also to our dedicated team of CAATnews stuffers. Printed by Russell Press on 100% recycled paper using only post consumer de-inked waste. Copy deadline for the next issue is 18 September and we shall be posting it the week beginning 2 October. Content of most website references are also available in print – contact Sign of the times. See page 10 PATRICK DELANEY the CAAT office. Contributors to CAATnews express their own opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of CAAT as an organisation. Contributors retain Shut DESO Day of Action 3 copyright of all work used. CAAT was set up in 1974 and is a Arms Trade Shorts 4-5 broad coalition of groups and individuals working for the reduction and ultimate abolition of the Arms Trade Detectives 6 international arms trade, together with progressive demilitarisation within arms-producing countries. Local Campaigns 7 Campaign Against Arms Trade 11 Goodwin Street, London N4 3HQ Cover story: India and Pakistan 8-9 tel: 020 7281 0297 fax: 020 7281 4369 email: [email protected] Action in Farnborough 10 web: www.caat.org.uk If you use Charities Aid Foundation Mark Thomas writes 11 cheques and would like to help TREAT (Trust for Research and Education on Arms Trade), please send CAF Parliamentary 12 cheques, payable to TREAT, to the office.
    [Show full text]
  • Comedy and Distinction: the Cultural Currency of a ‘Good’ Sense of Humour
    Sam Friedman Comedy and distinction: the cultural currency of a ‘good’ sense of humour Book (Accepted Version) Original citation: Comedy and distinction: the cultural currency of a ‘good’ sense of humour, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014, 228 pages. © 2017 The Author This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59932/ Available in LSE Research Online: September 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Introduction: Funny to Whom? In January 2011, the scheduling plans of Britain’s biggest TV station, BBC 1, were leaked to the press. After the recent success of BBC comedies such as Outnumbered and My Family, BBC1 Controller Danny Cohen apparently told his team of producers that BBC Comedy was becoming ‘too middle class’, and failing in its responsibility to appeal to working class viewers (Gammell, 2011; Revoir, 2011; Leith, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Adjacent-Channel Interference Management, the Margin Between Median Signal Levels
    T-DAB in the UK T-DAB— overcoming the spectrum planning and interference issues Mark Thomas Director of Engineering, UK Radio Authority The roll-out of T-DAB in the UK is proceeding rapidly, with a large proportion of the population now within range of a wide choice of digital radio programme services. The main drivers for reaching this stage have been a mixture of industry resolve, consensus, long-term vision and investment – catalysed by well-constructed incentives. This article looks at the background to the UK’s frequency plan, then looks more closely at two areas of work undertaken by the UK Radio Authority to control interference between the transmissions of different multiplex operators. Another Christmas for DAB? What will St. Nicholas bring us this year? There is another set of DAB radios in the shops, but for the average consumer, there are still not that many and they are not that cheap. However this situation is starting to change more noticeably. The number of DAB receivers sold is not sending shock waves through the industry (although falling share values are) but, as the prices steadily if slowly fall, we can expect a steady if slow increase in penetration. The last week in November has seen a press release which promises a variety of “radio-inclusive” products from the British firm, Goodmans, starting at £100 (about 160 euros). Goodmans is a mass-market rather than a niche-market manufacturer. These receivers will be available in the latter part of 2002 and it is unlikely that Goodmans’ competitors will let them have it all their own way.
    [Show full text]
  • Churches Update Dec 2010.Pub
    Churches Update News from the Labour Party w: labour.org.uk/faith Issue 10, 2010 Standing up for fairness Labour pledges to work with Britain’s churches in the face of massive spending cuts Labour’s Shadow Chancellor, Alan Johnson, has pledged to work with churches who have concerns about the impact on the poorest of massive Government spending cuts. Chancellor George Osborne unveiled wide-ranging public service cuts in October. The measures extended earlier cuts that were announced in Osborne’s June Budget. Under the Government’s plans, Britain’s welfare budget will be particularly hard hit, with £18 billion of cuts per year by 2014-15. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, a respected think tank, has already described the impact of the cuts as “regressive”, as the poorest will be hit hardest. Alan Johnson added: “The Treasury’s own figures show the Other church leaders have criticised figures in the CSR poorest in society will pay more to reduce the deficit which they claim exaggerate the cost to the taxpayer than almost anyone else. This is a reckless gamble of welfare fraud. Graham Sparkes of the Baptist Union with people’s livelihoods and the case for it is of Great Britain, said : “There is already deep concern unravelling fast.” that the severe reductions in welfare provision will cause immense hardship to the most vulnerable. This “The Labour John Sentamu, the misuse of figures to exaggerate the scale of benefit Archbishop of York, echoed fraud only adds to the sense of injustice.” Party shares Mr Johnson’s concerns. He many of the said: “To cut investment to Simon Loveitt, from the United Reformed Church, churches’ vital public services, and to added: “The coalition government is very keen to talk concerns and will withdraw investment from about fairness and the false notion that ‘we are all in work with them communities, is madness.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Election Results: Revised September 2003 1992-97
    Factsheet M14 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised September 2003 1992-97 Contents Summary 2 This Factsheet has been archived so the Notes 3 Tables 3 content and web links may be out of Constituency results 10 date. Please visit our About Parliament Contact information 20 pages for current information. Feedback form 21 There were 18 by-elections in the 1992 Parliament. Of these by-elections, nine resulted in a change in winning party compared with the 1992 General Election. The Conservatives lost eight seats of which four went to the Liberal Democrats and three to Labour. Sixteen of the by-elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while the other two followed resignations. September 2003 FS No.M14 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-elections: 1992-97 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M14 Summary There were 18 by-elections in the 1992 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 8 summarise the results and pages 9 to 14 give results for each constituency. Nine seats changed hands at by- elections, with the Conservatives losing eight. Of these, the Liberal Democrats gained four, Labour gained three and the SNP gained one. The other seat to change hands was North Down which was won by a United Kingdom Unionist candidate.
    [Show full text]