Comparative Genomics of Clinical and Environmental Vibrio Mimicus
Comparative genomics of clinical and environmental Vibrio mimicus Nur A. Hasana, Christopher J. Grima,b,1, Bradd J. Haleya, Jongsik Chunc,d, Munirul Alame, Elisa Taviania, Mozammel Hoqf, A. Christine Munkg, Elizabeth Saundersg, Thomas S. Bretting, David C. Bruceg, Jean F. Challacombeg, J. Chris Detterg, Cliff S. Hang, Gary Xieg, G. Balakrish Nairh, Anwar Huqa, and Rita R. Colwella,b,2 aMaryland Pathogen Research Institute and bUniversity of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; cSchool of Biological Sciences and dInstitute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea; eInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, 151-818, Republic of Korea;eInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh; fDepartment of Microbiology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh; gGenome Science Group, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545; and hNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata 700 010, India Contributed by Rita R. Colwell, October 22, 2010 (sent for review March 1, 2010) Whether Vibrio mimicus is a variant of Vibrio cholerae or a separate toxin (12), hemolysin (13), protease (14), phospholipase (15), ary- species has been the subject of taxonomic controversy. A genomic lesterase (16), siderophore (aerobactin) (17), and hemagglutinin analysis was undertaken to resolve the issue. The genomes of (18), the mechanism of its pathogenesis remains unclear. V. mimicus MB451, a clinical isolate, and VM223, an environmental The objective of this study was to determine the genetic basis of isolate, comprise ca. 4,347,971 and 4,313,453 bp and encode 3,802 V. mimicus physiology, pathogenicity, and evolution and to clarify and 3,290 ORFs, respectively.
[Show full text]