DOCSLIB.ORG

Special Education Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Special Education Handbook SPECIAL EDUCATION HANDBOOK Oklahoma State Department of Special Education Services 405-521-3351 • http://ok.gov/sde/special-education Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................................................................................................................1 HOW-TO GUIDE ON USING THIS MANUAL ...................................................................................9 NAVIGATION .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 A. Option 1 ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 B. Option 2 ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 INTERACTIVE LEGAL CITATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 11 A. Accessing Federal Regulations .................................................................................................................................................... 12 B. Accessing Oklahoma Statute & Regulations (Oklahoma Administrative Code) ...................................................... 13 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. 14 GLOSSARY............................................................................................................................................ 17 CHAPTER 1: FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE) ........................................ 40 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE) ............................... 41 SECTION 2. PROVISION OF A FAPE ...................................................................................................................... 41 A. LEA Obligation .................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 B. LEA Provision of a FAPE ................................................................................................................................................................. 42 C. Limit to LEA Obligation .................................................................................................................................................................. 42 D. When LEA Obligation to Provide a FAPE Ends ..................................................................................................................... 42 SECTION 3. FAPE CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................... 43 A. Incarcerated Students ..................................................................................................................................................................... 43 B. Funding Sources and Insurance .................................................................................................................................................. 43 C. Accessible Instructional Materials (AIM) ................................................................................................................................ 44 D. Assistive Technology ....................................................................................................................................................................... 45 E. Physical Education ............................................................................................................................................................................ 45 F. Residential Placement ..................................................................................................................................................................... 45 G. Extended School Year ...................................................................................................................................................................... 45 H. Charter Schools and Virtual Charter Schools......................................................................................................................... 46 I. Medication ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 46 SECTION 4. CASE LAW INTERPRETATIONS OF A FAPE ................................................................................. 46 CHAPTER 2: CHILD FIND ................................................................................................................ 50 SECTION 1. LEA RESPONSIBILITY ....................................................................................................................... 51 SECTION 2. LOCATING STUDENTS ...................................................................................................................... 51 A. Coordination ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 B. Public Awareness .............................................................................................................................................................................. 51 SECTION 3. IDENTIFYING STUDENTS ................................................................................................................ 52 A. Screening .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 52 B. Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) .................................................................................................................... 52 SECTION 4. SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL .................................................................................................. 53 Page | 2 SECTION 5. EARLY CHILDHOOD CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................... 54 A. Transition Planning Conference (TPC) .................................................................................................................................... 54 B. Late Referrals to SoonerStart ....................................................................................................................................................... 55 C. Late Referrals to LEA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 55 CHAPTER 3: INITIAL EVALUATION & ELIGIBILITY ............................................................... 58 SECTION 1. REQUEST FOR INITIAL EVALUATION.......................................................................................... 60 SECTION 2. PARENT RIGHTS ................................................................................................................................. 60 SECTION 3. REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA (RED) ............................................................................................. 61 A. No Additional Data Needed ........................................................................................................................................................... 61 B. Additional Data Needed .................................................................................................................................................................. 61 SECTION 4. WRITTEN NOTICE/PARENTAL CONSENT .................................................................................. 61 A. Written Notice .................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 B. Request for Parental Consent....................................................................................................................................................... 62 C. Failure to Respond or Provide Consent ................................................................................................................................... 62 SECTION 5. EVALUATION ....................................................................................................................................... 63 A. Evaluation Group............................................................................................................................................................................... 63 B. Parent Participation ......................................................................................................................................................................... 63 C. Timeline ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 63 D. Evaluation Procedures ...................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read-My-Lips: a Multimedia Project for the Hearing
    JOAQUIN VILA and KATHLEEN M. AHLERS READ-MY -LIPS: A MULTIMEDIA PROJECT FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED Read-My-Lips is an interactive multimedia system designed to help instructors teach language and communication skills to the hearing-impaired. The system comprises three multimedia instructional modules. (1) Babel is an expert system that translates text to speech in any language that uses the Roman alphabet. This module depicts the process of speech by displaying a front view and a profIle cross view of a human face in synchronization with the output sounds of a speech synthesizer. (2) Read & See consists of a series of stories and games that are displayed with text and full video motion. Selected vocabulary within the story is signed and spoken using digitized video sequences. (3) Fingerspelling allows the student to request any word or number to be "fingerspelled." INTRODUCTION The computer has become a popular instructional tool available from the Alexander Graham Bell Association used in school programs for the hearing-impaired. l Many for the Deaf, use drill and practice methods for the computer programs are geared exclusively to the presen­ speech-reading of everyday utterances. tation and practice of academic content.2 Yet several As technology has improved, interactive video has software packages for the hearing-impaired focus on been used in designing speech-reading programs. A sys­ specific speech, speech-reading, and/or auditory skills. tem titled DAVID6 (dynamic audio video interactive de­ Hearing-impaired students have great difficulty master­ vice) was created in 1978. It requires students to view ing these skills because of their degree of hearing loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Poor Print Quality
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 476 841 FL 027 697 AUTHOR Kontra, Miklos TITLE British Aid for Hungarian Deaf Education from a Linguistic Human Rights Point of View. PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 9p.; An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Biennial Conference of the Hungarian Society for the Study of English (4th, Budapest, Hungary, January 28-30, 1999). Some parts contain light or broken text. PUB TYPE Journal Articles (080) Reports Descriptive (141) JOURNAL CIT Hungarian Journal of Applied Linguistics; vl n2 p63-68 2001 EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Deafness; Educational Discrimination; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; Higher Education; *Oral Communication Method; *Sign Language; Speech Communication; Teaching Methods IDENTIFIERS *Hungary; United Kingdom ABSTRACT This paper discusses the issue of oral versus sign language in educating people who are deaf, focusing on Hungary, which currently emphasizes oralism and discourages the use of Hungarian Sign Language. Teachers of people who are hearing impaired are trained to use the acoustic channel and view signing as an obstacle to the integration of deaf people into mainstream Hungarian society. A recent news report describes how the British. Council is giving children's books to a Hungarian college for teachers of handicapped students, because the college believes in encouraging hearing impaired students' speaking skills through picture books rather than allowing then to use sign language. One Hungarian researcher writes that the use of Hungarian Sign Language hinders the efficiency of teaching students who are hard of hearing, because they often prefer it to spoken Hungarian. This paper suggests that the research obscures the difference between medically deaf children, who will never learn to hear, and hearing impaired children, who may learn to hear and speak to some extent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition from Fingerspelling to English Print: Facilitating English Decoding
    The Transition From Fingerspelling to English Print: Facilitating English Decoding Tamara S. Haptonstall-Nykaza Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind Brenda Schick University of Colorado, Boulder Fingerspelling is an integral part of American Sign Lan- orthography available in most written systems. Re- guage (ASL) and it is also an important aspect of becoming search on hearing children’s development of reading bilingual in English and ASL. Even though fingerspelling is has found strong connections between children’s pho- based on English orthography, the development of finger- spelling does not parallel the development of reading in nological systems and awareness of phonological reg- hearing children. Research reveals that deaf children may ularities and their ability to read (see Snow, Burns, & initially treat fingerspelled words as lexical items rather than Griffin, 1998). Typically, reading is viewed, in large a series of letters that represent English orthography and part, as reflecting English skills, and deaf children’s only later begin to learn to link handshapes to English gra- longstanding difficulties with learning to read are con- phemes. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a training method that uses fingerspelling and phonological sidered to be a problem with English (King & Quigley, patterns that resemble those found in lexicalized finger- 1985; Paul, 1998). More recently, researchers have be- spelling to teach deaf students unknown English vocabulary gun to investigate how American Sign Language, or would increase their ability to learn the fingerspelled and ASL, can support and facilitate reading in English (see orthographic version of a word. There were 21 deaf students (aged 4–14 years) who participated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Hundred Years' War in Deaf Education
    THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS' WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy By A. Tellings PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/146075 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2020-04-15 and may be subject to change. THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS* WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy By A. Tellings THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS' WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy EEN WETENSCHAPPELIJKE PROEVE OP HET GEBIED VAN DE SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN PROEFSCHRIFT TER VERKRIJGING VAN DE GRAAD VAN DOCTOR AAN DE KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT NIJMEGEN, VOLGENS BESLUIT VAN HET COLLEGE VAN DECANEN IN HET OPENBAAR TE VERDEDIGEN OP 5 DECEMBER 1995 DES NAMIDDAGS TE 3.30 UUR PRECIES DOOR AGNES ELIZABETH JACOBA MARIA TELLINGS GEBOREN OP 9 APRIL 1954 TE ROOSENDAAL Dit onderzoek werd verricht met behulp van subsidie van de voormalige Stichting Pedon, NWO Mediagroep Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen PROMOTOR: Prof.Dr. A.W. van Haaften COPROMOTOR: Dr. G.L.M. Snik 1 PREFACE The methods controversy in deaf education has fascinated me since I visited the International Congress on Education of the Deaf in Hamburg (Germany) in 1980. There I was struck by the intemperate emotions by which the methods controversy is attended. This book is an attempt to understand what this controversy really is about I would like to thank first and foremost Prof.Wouter van Haaften and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Cued Speech in Teacher of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Preparation Programs Aaron Rose
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Program in Audiology and Communication Independent Studies and Capstones Sciences 2010 Representation of Cued Speech in teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing preparation programs Aaron Rose Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Rose, Aaron, "Representation of Cued Speech in teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing preparation programs" (2010). Independent Studies and Capstones. Paper 598. Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine. http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones/598 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences at Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Studies and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Representation of Cued Speech in Teacher of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Preparation Programs By Aaron Rose An Independent Study Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of: Masters of Science in Deaf Education Washington University School of Medicine Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences May 21, 2010 Approved by Heather Hayes, Ph.D., Independent Study Advisor Hilary Franklin, M.A., Secondary Reader Abstract This descriptive study investigates the representation of Cued Speech in teacher of the deaf preparation programs as well as attitudes towards inclusion of Cued Speech in those programs in the context of the 2004 reauthorization of IDEA. The issue of Cued Speech is discussed as a communication modality and implications for deaf education are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Teachers and Parents on Verbal Communication Among
    rde iso rs, D De on a ti f Lawal et al., Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing a S c t i u n d u i e Aids 2016, 4:2 m s Journal of Communication Disorders, & m o H C e DOI: 10.4172/2375-4427.1000159 f a o r l ISSN: 2375-4427i n a g n r A u i d o s J Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids Research Article Open Access Training Teachers and Parents on Verbal Communication among Children with Hearing Impairment: Preliminary Results from Schools in Kenya Luqman Lawal1*, Mathew Karia2, Chalese Buttars3, Jeffery Larsen3, Wakisa Mulwafu4 and Kaitesi Mukara5 1Division of Health Policy and management, University of Minnesota School of Public health, MN, USA 2Department of Special needs, Speech Language Pathology program, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya 3Department of Communicative disorders and deaf education, Utah State University, UT, USA 4Department of ENT, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi 5College of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of ENT, University of Rwanda, Rwanda *Corresponding author: Luqman Lawal, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public health, MN, USA, Tel: +16513075288; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: April 21, 2016; Accepted date: May 25, 2016; Published date: June 1, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Lawal L, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Purpose: We sought to assess the outcome of training parents and teachers on verbal communication with children that have hearing impairment in selected schools in Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Brief: the Importance of Fingerspelling for Reading
    VISUAL LANGUAGE & VISUAL LEARNING NSF supported Science of Learning Center on Visual Language and Visual Learning, SBE-0541953, RESEARCH BRIEF: Gallaudet University. THE IMPORTANCE OF FINGERSPELLING FOR READING JULY 2010 Key Findings on the Importance of Fingerspelling for Reading: LEARNING FROM RESEARCH • Deaf families fingerspell to their deaf children when they are very young. • Early exposure to fingerspelling helps these children become better # 1 readers. • Fingerspelling, reading, and writing are interrelated. • Fingerspelling facilitates English vocabulary growth, and larger the lexicon, the faster new vocabulary is learned. • Fingerspelling positively correlates with stronger reading skills. Deaf Written by: and hard of hearing children who are good fingerspellers are good Sharon Baker, Ed.D. readers, and vice versa. 1 of 8 NSF SCIENCE OF LEARNING CENTER ON VISUAL LANGUAGE AND VISUAL LEARNING RESEARCH BRIEF NO. 1: THE IMPORTANCE OF FINGERSPELLING FOR READING Fingerspelling and American Sign hearing children from deaf families tend to read at Language higher levels than deaf and hard of hearing children from hearing families.11 Fingerspelling likely On the most simplistic level, fingerspelling can be contributes to this success. Unfortunately, young defined as the use of handshapes to represent deaf and hard of hearing children from hearing letters of the alphabet. Indeed, before the families are not generally given the same early complexity of fingerspelling was documented, learning opportunity. Indeed, the absence of researchers thought fingerspelling was merely a fingerspelling is particularly evident in preschools manual representation of English orthography for deaf and hard of hearing children.9 To 1 (print). They believed fingerspelling was primarily understand the role of fingerspelling in language for representing proper nouns or for English words acquisition and later literacy, it is important to 2,3 without a sign equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Perception of the School Experiences of Five Generations of Deaf Students
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2015 Perception of the School Experiences of Five Generations of Deaf Students Charles DePew Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Educational Methods Commons Recommended Citation DePew, Charles, "Perception of the School Experiences of Five Generations of Deaf Students" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1292. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1292 This dissertation (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: PERCEPTION OF THE SCHOOL EXPERIENCES PERCEPTION OF THE SCHOOL EXPERIENCES OF FIVE GENERATIONS OF DEAF STUDENTS by CHARLES DEPEW (Under the Direction of Delores Liston) ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate deaf participants’ perspectives of their educational experiences within the last 50 years. The study was comprised of five deaf participants educated in the public school setting, and four deaf participants educated in the residential setting. The qualitative study utilized three in-depth interviews, a survey, and the researcher’s reflections/notes. The findings suggest deaf students’ educational experiences are impacted by low academic expectations. Sign language can be a powerful learning tool or a barrier for deaf students as deaf students depend on sign language and visuals to support their learning. Both spoken and written English are likely to be a struggle for deaf students.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting the Ability to Lip-Read in Children Who Have a Hearing Loss Jeanne Breitmayer Flowers
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Program in Audiology and Communication Independent Studies and Capstones Sciences 2006 Predicting the ability to lip-read in children who have a hearing loss Jeanne Breitmayer Flowers Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Flowers, Jeanne Breitmayer, "Predicting the ability to lip-read in children who have a hearing loss" (2006). Independent Studies and Capstones. Paper 428. Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine. http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones/428 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences at Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Studies and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Predicting the Ability to Lip-Read in Children who have a Hearing Loss by Jeanne Breitmayer Flowers An Independent Study submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree requirements for the degree of: Masters of Science in Deaf Education Washington University School of Medicine Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences May 19, 2006 Approved by: Nancy Tye-Murray, Ph.D., Independent Study Advisor Abstract: This study aims to discover if a variety of factors related to a child’s education and audiologic history predict a child’s ability to lip-read. 1 Introduction A variety of factors could potentially influence a child’s ability to lip-read, such as a child’s age, the child’s current school placement, or the child’s speech, language, and speech perception ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Language Policy and Planning to Deaf Education
    LPREN Brief Language Policy Research Network Brief March 2014 Applications of Language Policy and Planning to Deaf Education By Sarah E. Compton, University of Jyväskylä, and Francis M. Hult, Lund University Introduction spaces in curricula as subjects, and which language(s) Language policy and planning center on how multi­ are used in texts and teaching materials, among others lingualism is managed in society. Language­in­education (Reagan, 2010, pp. 50-52). planning is a specific type of language policy and plan­ ning that focuses on how decisions are made with re­ Acquisition Planning spect to which language(s) and modalities are used for Decisions are also made in relation to language users teaching and learning within education. Special atten­ and how they develop language skills. In education, this tion is paid to understanding how decisions are made would include how students are supported (or not) in about the language abilities students need (in various enhancing their current linguistic abilities for academic languages) in order to participate in society and, in turn, purposes as well as what opportunities they have for how they can achieve those abilities (Kaplan & Baldauf, learning additional languages (Reagan, 2010, p. 53). 1997). Corpus Planning All planning in deaf education is, in essence, related to Moreover, decisions are made with respect to the linguis­ language planning since issues of modality in instruc­ tic form of a language. In education, this would include tion are of central concern (Reagan, 2010). In this way, decisions about the development and standardization of principles of language planning and policy can inform specific linguistic forms such as orthography and lexical the work of all professionals involved in various aspects expansion, among others (Reagan, 2010, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Methods Debate Within Deaf Education in Historical Perspective
    Signs versus Whispers: The Methods debate within Deaf Education in Historical Perspective with the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind (FSDB) as a case study. Melissa Klatzkow Klatzkow 2 Table of Contents: Introduction: 3 Chapter One: Prelude to the oralist movement: 9 Chapter Two: The Changes In Sentiments: 16 Chapter Three: The “Rise” of Oralism: 23 Chapter Four: The Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind; St. Augustine: 33 Epilogue: 51 Conclusion: 57 Glossary: 63 Bibliography: 64 Klatzkow 3 Introduction Mr. and Mrs. Cole were like any couple, living in a typical town at the turn of the century. They lived in an average house and worked normal jobs. They attended church and were, for all intents and purposes, model citizens. Several years into their marriage, they had a daughter they named Susan. At first, the Coles’ were delighted—they had wanted a child for some time now—but soon they began noticing that their daughter was developmentally behind. Mrs. Cole noticed it first. She realized that, where her friend’s babies had begun to babble, her own was silent. At first, she brushed it off and decided to ignore it, but as Susan grew older and no speech became apparent, the Coles’ concern grew. Eventually, they took Susan to a doctor, only to have their worst fears confirmed—Susan was deaf. This shocked the Coles—neither had a deaf relative and Susan had always been very healthy. Their doctor began telling them about how their daughter would enter a residential school, where she would have little contact with them for most of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Experience Narratives in the Deaf Community: Identifying Deaf-World Typicality
    Personal Experience Narratives in the Deaf Community: Identifying Deaf-World Typicality by Lesley Davidson April 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of MA (by Research) at the University of Central Lancashire STUDENT DECLARATION FORM Concurrent registration for two or more academic awards *I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution ____________________________________________________________________ Material submitted for another award *I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work ____________________________________________________________________ Signature of Candidate ______________________________________________________ Type of Award MA by Research__________________________________________ School Humanities and Social Sciences____________________________ Abstract The Deaf community in Britain comprises people who use British Sign Language (BSL) to communicate and who share similar lived experiences. The storied lives of Deaf people, told in the community through personal experience narratives, provide insight into the issues that arise from being Deaf in a primarily hearing world. This thesis explores personal experience narratives told by 24 Deaf people from across the UK in an attempt to reveal the typicality embedded within signed personal experience narratives. As a study of human experiences, a qualitative approach is taken and this is reinforced with some numerical data that reveals the frequency of occurrence of patterns across the data sets. This qualitative research study explores signed narratives derived from two main sources: The British Sign Language Corpus and an additional data set collected through fieldwork.
    [Show full text]