DOCSLIB.ORG

County in Touch 05 June 2014 Layout 1.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County in Touch 05 June 2014 Layout 1.Qxd Nottinghamshire inin For hard working people touch June 2014 Comment There’s going to be a by- election they said when Winning is sweet Patrick Mercer resigned his seat. And what a by-election! Robert Jenrick swept to victory Never has Newark seen so much political activity and never have so many Tory members of Parliament de- scended on the town with such frequency that it all bacame quite bewildering to not only the electorate but to the many volunteer workers who also found their way into the con- stituency from all parts of the country to make sure that Robert Jenrick re- tained the seat. Volunteers found them- selves sitting next to Theresa May as she stuffed leaflets into envelo- ples at campaign head- quarters whilst Defence Secretary Philip Hammond spent a morning doing the same at the Party shop in Robert Jenrick swept aside all Newark’s Stodman Street. the competition to win the by- David Cameron came to election with 17,435 votes and Newark on four occasions, a comfortable margin of 7,407 Two for Europe George Osborne and over second placed Ukip with William Hague were close 10,028. Labour came a poor behind him, the latter fitting third with 6,842 votes and the in a coffee morning out in Lib Dems were forced into 6th the sticks at Fiskerton. place with 1,004. Boris Johnson wooed the In his victory speech Robert crowd in the Market Place, commented that not for the first Michael Gove was present time in its history the eyes of and Kenneth Clarke added the nation have fallen on his weight to the proceed- Newark. ings. He said the by-election had It would take up far too wider national significance be- much space to list the cause the Conservatives had names of all Cabinet Minis- not won a by-election in Gov- ters and MP’s who came to ernment since William Hague lend their hand at leaflet some 25 years ago. dropping, canvassing and even giving out baloons to He continued; "The people of children. Prospective can- Newark have voted to back this didates were put on trial Government and its economic pounding the streets in plan to secure the future of this towns and villages constituency and of this great country. We have fought this by The excitement of the election on the issues that mat- chase was upon everyone ter to the people of Newark." and Newark’s local activists rubbed shoulders with their Robert Jenrick said that he opposite numbers from al- would now work to deliver on most every Association in the key issues including im- the country. proving transport infrastructure We saw the outragious and securing the future of candidates as well as the Newark Hospital. more serious ones and it Ukip’s Roger Helmer proved to Emma McClarkin has retained her seat as an East Mid- was all down to by-election be a poor loser and used his lands member of the European Parliament and has been fever. thankyou speech to criticise joined by fellow Conservative Andrew Lewer to equal the We knew who was going to the Conservative campaign. two MEP’s elected for the previous session. This despite win and win he did with a Labour’s Chris Bryant said they the big efforts by Ukip which saw the Liberal Democrat lose clear mandate too. (Conservatives) still haven't got Any of the views expressed in this a winning streak with them. So his seat and leaving Labour with only one representative column are not necessarily those of where has he been? for the East Midlands. the Conservative Party. Promoted and edited by Philip Ingall on behalf of Nottinghamshire Conservatives, both at King Edward Court, King Edward Street Nottingham NG1 1EW Balloons, rosettes and people power The area team Area Chairman Debbie Mason Deputy Political James Spencer Deputy Membership Treasurer Francis Purdue-Horan Communications Philip Ingall Promoted and edited by Philip Ingall for Nottinghamshire Conservatives, both at King Edward Court, King Edward Street Nottingham NG1 1EW.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copy of 2008122008-Cwells-Regulated
    1 donation information continues on reverse Late reported donation by regulated donees 15 February 2001 - 31 January 2008 (where data is available) Regulated donee Donor organisation Donor forename Donor surname Donor status Address 1 Address 2 Jimmy Hood MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Keith Simpson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Cheryl Gillan MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Elfyn Llwyd MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John Gummer MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Christopher Beazles BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Chris Smith MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mike Weir MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tony Worthington MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Davidson MP BAA plc Company 130 Wilton Road Paul Tyler BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Matthew Taylor MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Menzies Campbell MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Archy Kirkwood BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Hanson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Colin Breed MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Marshall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mark Oaten MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Diana Wallis MEP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall Christopher Ruane MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tim Loughton MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John McFall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Bar, Closing the Gap
    Opportunity Agenda: Giving people more opportunity and power over their lives Contents Foreword by David Cameron ..............................................................................................................page 1 The new world of freedom ....................................................................................................................pages 2–3 Old politics isn’t working ..........................................................................................................................pages 4–5 Change required: public policy in the post-bureaucratic age ...................pages 6–7 Our Opportunity Agenda ......................................................................................................................page 8 Our school reform plan: summary ..............................................................................................page 9 Our school reform plan in detail Overview ................................................................................................................................................................pages 10–16 Immediate action driving urgent improvement: summary ...................page 17 The supply-side revolution: summary .............................................................................page 18 A revolution in opportunity for the next generation .....................................page 19 1. Immediate action driving urgent improvement 1.1 Tackling discipline, preventing failure ..................................................................pages
    [Show full text]
  • A Surveillance Society?
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee A Surveillance Society? Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 May 2008 HC 58-II [Incorporating HC 508-i–iv, Session 2006–07] Published on 8 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £24.50 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chairman) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Charshalton and Wallington) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the inquiry: Rt Hon John Denham MP (Labour, Southampton Itchen) Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton) Mr Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Rough Transcript, Check Against Delivery
    1 MICHAEL GOVE MP THE ANDREW MARR SHOW 12TH JULY 2020 MICHAEL GOVE MP Minister for the Cabinet Office (Rough transcript, check against delivery) AM: Mr Gove, welcome. Should face masks be mandatory in shops in England? MG: I don’t think mandatory, no. But I would encourage people to wear face masks when they’re inside in an environment where they’re likely to be mixing with others and where the ventilation may not be as good as it might. So I think that it is basic good manners, courtesy, consideration to wear a face mask if you are, for example, in a shop. AM: But we don’t need the law to do that? MG: Well, I trust people’s good sense. Of course the government at all times does look at the emerging evidence about what the best way to control the disease is. If necessary and if tough measures are required, as we’ve seen in Leicester – obviously a very different situation – then tough measures will be taken. But on the whole my view is that it’s always better to trust to people’s common sense to give them their sense of what is wise, and I think that individuals and businesses are responding well to that lead. AM: You’re talking about borders today. Are Britain’s borders going to be ready and secure by the end of this year? MG: Yes, I think they will be. AM: Because your colleague, Liz Truss, as we know, as expressed some real worries about this. She said in her letter that she wanted assurances ‘that we’ll be able to deliver full control at ports by July 2021 and that plans are in place from January to 2 MICHAEL GOVE MP mitigate the risk of goods being circumvented from ports intercepting port controls.’ In other words, the whole thing is tight by then.
    [Show full text]
  • BIA Briefing on the Conservative Party Leadership Candidates
    BIA briefing on the Conservative Party leadership candidates June 2019 Contents The candidates...................................................................................................................................................... 2 The election process ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Biographies ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Michael Gove ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Matt Hancock ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Mark Harper ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Jeremy Hunt ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Sajid Javid ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Boris Johnson .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Andrea Leadsom .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Things We Learned from the Tory Leadership Debate
    6 things we learned from the Tory Leadership Debate By Bethan Tolley, Communications Officer at the Centre for Brexit Studies Five men, one job. Last night BBC One played host to their very first Tory Leadership Debate. ‘Our Next Prime Minister’ saw all five remaining contenders – Boris Johnson, Jeremy Hunt, Michael Gove, Sajid Javid and Rory Stewart – battle it out on live TV with a series of questions on various topics from the great British public. Here’s the six things we learned from the debate… Where do they really stand on Brexit? Of course, a huge amount of the debate was all about Brexit and if we really will be leaving on the 31st October. Boris Johnson stated on several occasions that the UK will absolutely leave the EU by the 31st October, because otherwise the Conservative party face a “catastrophic loss of confidence in politics.” On the other hand, Jeremy Hunt stated that he would have the UK leave the EU on that date if there was no option of another deal, however, if there was a prospect that we were nearly there, then I would take a bit longer.”. Michael Gove stated that as he started this (leave campaign) “I will finish it – I will make sure that we leave the European Union in good order”. However, he also agreed with Jeremy Hunt that he would extend if he needed to – but only by a couple of days. Sajid Javid stated that it is fundamental that we leave the EU by the 31st October: “We’ve got to learn from our mistakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Committee Membership Lists
    Cabinet December Committee Membership 2014 Lists 1 Contents Coalition Committee ................................................................................................... 3 Devolution Committee ................................................................................................ 4 Economic Affairs Committee ...................................................................................... 5 Economic Affairs (Infrastructure) sub-Committee ................................................... 6 Economic Affairs (Reducing Regulation) sub-Committee ....................................... 7 European Affairs Committee ...................................................................................... 8 European Affairs sub-Committee ............................................................................ 9 Flooding Committee ................................................................................................. 10 Growth and Enterprise Committee ........................................................................... 11 Home Affairs Committee .......................................................................................... 12 Home Affairs (Armed Forces Covenant) sub-Committee ...................................... 14 Home Affairs (Greening Government Commitments) sub-Committee .................. 15 Local Growth Committee .......................................................................................... 16 Local Growth sub-Committee ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Update
    Coalition Update: 28 June-4 July The Civil Service Watchdog to audit political appointments (Guardian, 28 June) Sir David Normington, the civil service commissioner, is to audit appointments made since the election after allegations that the coalition has exploited loopholes that allow ministers to recruit people on short-term contracts without advertising first. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jun/28/civil-service-political-appointments-audit In this era of capitulation, the log-rollers are rampant (Guardian, 28 June) Simon Jenkins claims "Whitehall is no longer a partnership between ministers and officials", the result of "a decade of process". http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/28/defence-civil-service Policy Differences Immigration review will examine controversial human rights law (Telegraph, 2 July) Immigration has divided the Cabinet, with Nick Clegg and Michael Gove joining forces to block Home Office's plan for a cap on foreign students allowed to stay once studies are completed. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/8612917/Immigration-review-will- examine-controversial-human-rights-law.html Will David Cameron win the battle to control immigration? (Telegraph, 2 July) Tim Montgomerie on coalition infighting on immigration and Tory backbench concern that Liam Fox and IDS are too focused on their departments and not pulling coalition toward their end of the political spectrum, as Lib Dem ministers are doing. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/8612889/Will-David-Cameron-win- the-battle-to-control-our-borders.html Demand to curb casino banking risks splitting the coalition (Guardian, 2 July) Senior Lib Dems have called for ring-fenced retail banks.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ministers' Interests
    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2015 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Prime Minister 3 Attorney General’s Office 5 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 6 Cabinet Office 8 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 12 Ministry of Defence 14 Department for Education 16 Department of Energy and Climate Change 18 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 19 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20 Department of Health 22 Home Office 24 Department for International Development 26 Ministry of Justice 27 Northern Ireland Office 30 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 31 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 32 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 33 Scotland Office 34 Department for Transport 35 HM Treasury 37 Wales Office 39 Department for Work and Pensions 40 Government Whips – Commons 42 Government Whips – Lords 46 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list in writing of all relevant interests known to them which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Party's Leadership Election
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Essex Research Repository THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY’S LEADERSHIP ELECTION OF 2016: CHOOSING A LEADER IN GOVERNMENT Corresponding author: Thomas Quinn Department of Government University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester CO4 3SQ Email: [email protected] This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in British Politics. DOI: 10.1057/s41293-018-0071-2 Accepted for publication: 2 January 2018 The Conservative Party’s Leadership Election of 2016: Choosing a Leader in Government Abstract This paper examines the British Conservative Party’s leadership election of 2016, held in the aftermath of the UK’s referendum vote to leave the European Union. The paper analyses the contest using Stark’s theoretical framework, which assumes that leaders are chosen according to a hierarchy of criteria: acceptability, electability and competence, in that order. The eventual victor, Theresa May, was indeed the strongest candidate on all three criteria. However, electability appeared subordinate to competence during the contest. Electability is usually regarded as more basic than competence because parties must first win elections before they can start governing. However, governing parties are already in office and new leaders chosen mid-term must begin governing immediately. Current competence in office may be a prerequisite for future electability. The paper reviews other post-war leadership elections in Britain and finds that competence normally superseded electability as a selection criterion in governing parties. This finding implies a modification of Stark’s framework. Key words: Conservative Party; EU referendum; leadership elections; prime ministers; Theresa May 1 Britain’s historic referendum vote in June 2016 to leave the European Union (EU) unleashed an immediate wave of political instability in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Truss Must Decide How to Proceed with Gove Reforms
    Truss must decide how to proceed with Gove reforms Liz Truss, the first female lord chancellor in more than 1,000 years of the role, arrives at the Ministry of Justice at a time of upheaval in the courts and crisis in jails. The new justice secretary’s in-tray will be dominated by prisons including the immediate issues of safety and drugs along with the future of Michael Gove’s ambitious reform proposals. Ms Truss, who was a member of the justice select committee in her first years in parliament, will want to look at Mr Gove’s programme, which had yet to produce anything of substance. She will need to scrutinise his proposals to devolve power to governors to allow them to run their jails with more freedom, which were intended for a white paper in October followed by legislation next year. The ministry has secured cash to build new jails which would enable Victorian prisons to be closed, but decisions will be needed soon if Mr Gove’s promise to build five new prisons by 2020 is to be met. One immediate issue for Ms Truss is how to deal with the growing threat from Islamic extremists in jails in England and Wales. Mr Gove said he was “very sympathetic” to a recommendation from a review that purpose-built units be created to hold a hard core of extremists. However, he admitted it would need the support of the new home secretary. Plans are well advanced for a £700 million computerisation of the courts service, which depends on £300 million being raised from the merger and closure of court buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameron's Conservatives and Immigration Bale, T; Hampshire, J; Partos, R
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Having One's Cake and Eating It Too: Cameron's Conservatives and Immigration Bale, T; Hampshire, J; Partos, R For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/2739 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] Having one’s cake and eating it too: Cameron’s Conservatives and Immigration Tim Bale, James Hampshire and Rebecca Partos, University of Sussex1 The May 2010 general election represented a change in tone on immigration and asylum policy for the Conservative Party. Although its manifesto still contained a promise to limit numbers and expressed concern about the abuse of student visas, the Party’s previous fixation with asylum seekers had disappeared. This paper considers the rationale for these developments in the light of David Cameron’s election as leader in late 2005 and his efforts from then on to reposition his party. Cameron’s initial silence on this issue and his appointment of a moderate as immigration spokesman were part of an attempt both to shift the focus onto the economic impact of migration and, more broadly, to ‘decontaminate the Tory brand’ in order to gain ‘permission to be heard’ by small-l liberals who were critical to the Party’s electoral recovery but alienated by hard-line stances.
    [Show full text]