DOCSLIB.ORG

SSBMD Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SSBMD Report Design Report Ballistic Missile Defense Submarine SSBMD Ocean Engineering Design Project AOE 4066 Spring 2008 Virginia Tech Team 1 . Christopher R. Blizzard – Team Leader _________________________________ 27537 Kyle Colantonio _________________________________ 27666 Van Jones _________________________________ 25922 Mike Toris _________________________________ 25654 David Riegel _________________________________ 27540 Matt Wichgers _________________________________ 13591 SSBMD(X) Design – VT Team 1 Page 2 Executive Summary This report describes the Concept Exploration and maneuverability, an axi-symmetric hullform for Development of a Diesel/ AIP Ballistic Missile producibility, and a sonar system capable of both active Defense Submarine (SSBMD) for the United States and passive sonar ASW missions. Navy. This concept design was completed in a two- The basic cost of construction of SSBMD is $1.575 semester ship design course at Virginia Polytechnic billion. This satisfies the goal of a lead ship BCC less Institute and State University. than $1.6 billion. The final concept design satisfies key The SSBMD requirement is based on the SSBMD performance requirements in the CDD within cost and Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) and Virginia risk constraints. The basic characteristics of SSBMD Tech SSBMD Acquisition Decision Memorandum are listed in the table below. (ADM). The submarine addresses the need to provide a sea-based ballistic missile defense launch Ship Characteristic Value capability to guard against rogue and hostile nation LOA 261.2 ft missile attack. The submarine platform allows for covert Beam 32 ft positioning near potential enemy launch sites and Diameter 32 ft provides a favorable launch angle for missile Submerged Displacement 3962 lton interception with guidance from surface or air 3 bourne assets. By utilizing a diesel-electric/AIP Submerged Displaced Volume 138027 ft design, a ballistic missile defense capability is Sprint Speed 22 knt achieved without endangering US nuclear assets or Snorkel Range @ 12 knt 5356 nm incurring the diplomatic risk inherent to nuclear submarine operations in or near foreign waters. The AIP Endurance @ 5 knt 24 days submarine is expected to operate in littoral and open AIP Sprint Endurance 56 minutes (21 nm) ocean environments. Open Cycle Diesel/AIP, The primary threats expected to be encountered 2xCAT 3512 V12 + 2x500kW Propulsion and Power include operating in areas of dense contact with high PEM; 5000kW-hr Zebra levels of civilian vessels present (near international batteries, Shrouded Propeller shipping lanes). 4 KEI in sail, Reconfigurable The primary missions carried out by the submarine torpedo room, 2x21” tubes, 8 Weapon Systems are Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), Intelligence, reloads; 24 Cell VLS (16 SM-3, Reconnaissance & Surveillance Operations, Inland 8TLAM), Missile Strike, as well as anti-submarine (ASW) and Sensors BSY-2 w/ CCSM EDO Arrays anti-surface ship (ASuW) capability (primarily for P for AIP 5knt 76 kW self defense). req SSBMD is a high effectiveness and moderate risk, Preq for Sprint Speed 6010 kW high end alternative selected from the non- Preq for Snorkel 1136 kW dominated frontier. This design was chosen to Battery Capacity 5000 kW-hr provide a ground-breaking, challenging project in which modern, innovative technologies such as PEM Diving Depth 570 ft fuel cells for air-independent propulsion, two five Total Officers 8 torpedo rotary launch systems, and four Kinetic Total Enlisted 47 Energy Interceptor (KEI) missiles contained in an advanced composite sail were utilized. SSBMD has Total Manning 55 many other attractive qualities including high Basic Cost of Construction $1.6 billion SSBMD(X) Design – VT Team 1 Page 3 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................................................................................................3 1 INTRODUCTION, DESIGN PROCESS AND PLAN..................................................................................................................................5 1.1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................5 1.2 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY, PROCESS, AND PLAN..................................................................................................6 1.3 WORK BREAKDOWN.....................................................................................................................................7 1.4 RESOURCES ..................................................................................................................................................7 2 MISSION DEFINITION ..................................................................................................................................................................................8 2.1 CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................................8 2.2 PROJECTED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT (POE) AND THREAT ..................................................................9 2.3 SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND MISSIONS ..........................................................................................................9 2.4 MISSION SCENARIOS ....................................................................................................................................9 2.5 REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES ......................................................................................................9 3 CONCEPT EXPLORATION ........................................................................................................................................................................11 3.1 TRADE-OFF STUDIES, TECHNOLOGIES, CONCEPTS AND DESIGN VARIABLES .............................................11 3.1.1 Hullform Alternatives......................................................................................................................11 3.1.2 Propulsion and Electrical Machinery Alternatives.........................................................................12 3.1.3 Automation and Manning................................................................................................................19 3.1.4 Combat System Alternatives............................................................................................................20 3.2 DESIGN SPACE............................................................................................................................................28 3.3 SHIP SYNTHESIS MODEL.............................................................................................................................31 3.4 OBJECTIVE ATTRIBUTES.............................................................................................................................33 3.4.1 Overall Measure of Effectiveness (OMOE) ....................................................................................33 3.4.2 Overall Measure of Risk (OMOR) ..................................................................................................34 3.4.3 Cost .................................................................................................................................................35 3.5 MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION .............................................................................................................36 3.6 OPTIMIZATION RESULTS.............................................................................................................................39 3.7 BASELINE CONCEPT DESIGN ......................................................................................................................39 4 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT (FEASIBILITY STUDY) ..........................................................................................................................40 4.1 HULL FORM................................................................................................................................................40 4.1.1 Final Hull Form Design..................................................................................................................40 4.2 INITIAL BALANCE AND TRIM ......................................................................................................................41 4.2.1 Displacing Volumes ........................................................................................................................44 4.2.2 Internal and External Tanks............................................................................................................45 4.2.3 Weights............................................................................................................................................46 4.2.4 Load Conditions..............................................................................................................................46 4.2.5 Initial Equilibrium Polygon ............................................................................................................47 4.2.6 Necessary Modifications and Baseline Equilibrium Polygon .........................................................47 4.2.7 Normal Surface Condition ..............................................................................................................48 4.3 STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................48
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Third Battle
    NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 16 The Third Battle Innovation in the U.S. Navy's Silent Cold War Struggle with Soviet Submarines N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI Owen R. Cote, Jr. Associate Director, MIT Security Studies Program The Third Battle Innovation in the U.S. Navy’s Silent Cold War Struggle with Soviet Submarines Owen R. Cote, Jr. Associate Director, MIT Security Studies Program NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, Rhode Island Naval War College The Newport Papers are extended research projects that the Newport, Rhode Island Editor, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the Center for Naval Warfare Studies President of the Naval War College consider of particular Newport Paper Number Sixteen interest to policy makers, scholars, and analysts. Candidates 2003 for publication are considered by an editorial board under the auspices of the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies. President, Naval War College Rear Admiral Rodney P. Rempt, U.S. Navy Published papers are those approved by the Editor of the Press, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the President Provost, Naval War College Professor James F. Giblin of the Naval War College. Dean of Naval Warfare Studies The views expressed in The Newport Papers are those of the Professor Alberto R. Coll authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Naval War College or the Department of the Navy. Naval War College Press Editor: Professor Catherine McArdle Kelleher Correspondence concerning The Newport Papers may be Managing Editor: Pelham G.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 1 Introduction
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 1: Introduction Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 1: Introduction. The other parts are: Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 - 2015
    60 Years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 - 2015 Peter Lobner August 2015 Foreword This rather lengthy presentation is my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the U.S. Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by the USS Nautilus, and then tracing the development and exploitation of nuclear propulsion over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have posted information on the internet on international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear vessels and naval weapons systems. My presentation contains a great deal of graphics from many internet sources. Throughout the presentation, I have made an effort to identify all of the sources for these graphics. If you have any comments or wish to identify errors in this presentation, please send me an e-mail to: [email protected]. I hope you find this presentation informative, useful, and different from any other single document on this subject. Best regards, Peter Lobner August 2015 60 Years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015 Organization of this presentation Part 1: Introduction Part 2: United States Part 3: Former Soviet Union & Russia Part 4: Other Nuclear Marine Nations UK, France, China, Germany, Japan & India Other nations with an interest in marine nuclear power technology: Brazil, Italy, Canada, Australia, North Korea,
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Smarter About Defense
    KNOW WHEN TO Hold ‘EM, KNOW WHEN to Fold ‘EM: A NEW TRANSFORMATION PLAN FOR THE NAvy’s SURfaCE BATTLE LINE Robert O. Work Thinking Center for Strategic and Budgetary Smarter Assessments About CSBA Defense csbaonline.org Know When to Hold ’Em, Know When to Fold ’Em: A New Transformation Plan for the Navy’s Surface Battle Line Robert O. Work Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ III I. THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD: RETRACING THE DEVELOPMENT OF POST-COLD WAR PLANS FOR THE NAVY’S FUTURE SURFACE BATTLE LINE .................................................................... 1 A Rapid Fall From Grace ...................................................................................... 1 Planning Under Conditions of Scarce Resources and Uncertainty .................... 3 Impact of the Gulf War ......................................................................................... 4 A “Defining Battle” ......................................................................................... 6 The Immediate Postwar Naval Priority: Land-Attack ........................................ 12 The “Requirements School” Takes Over ........................................................... 15 When Budgets and Requirements Collide: Coming to Terms With a “300-ship Navy” .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coldwarsubmarines.Pdf
    COLD WAR SUBMARINES The Project 941/Typhoon was the largest undersea craft ever built. These two—of six completed—are at their remote base of Nerpichya, about six miles from the entrance to Guba Zapadnaya Litsa on the Kola Peninsula, close to the borders with Finland and Norway. (Rubin CDB ME) Other Submarine-Related Books by Norman Polmar The American Submarine Atomic Submarines Death of the Thresher Guide to the Soviet Navy (4 editions) Rickover: Controversy and Genius with Thomas B. Allen Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet (7 editions) Submarines of the Imperial Japanese Navy with Dorr Carpenter Submarines of the Russian and Soviet Navies, 1718-1990 with Jurrien Noot POTOMAC BOOKS, INC. Copyright © 2004 by Norman Polmar. Published in the United States by Potomac Books Inc. (formerly Brassey’s, Inc.). All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Polmar, Norman Cold War submarines: U.S. and Soviet design and construction / Norman Polmar and Kenneth J. Moore—1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-57488-594-1 1. Submarines (Ships)—United States—History. 2. Submarines (Ships)—Soviet Union. 3. Cold War. I. Moore, Kenneth J., 1942– II. Title. V858.P63 2003 359.9'383'094709045—dc21 2003013123 ISBN 978-1–57488–530–9 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-57488-594-1 (hardcover) Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standards Institute Z39–48 Standard.
    [Show full text]